Prolongation of lung xenograft survival in rats with a short course of deoxyspergualin and cyclosporin A

Lung xenotransplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes the most recent progress in xeno lung transplantation (XLTx) to date. It describes the potential mechanisms of early xeno lung graft loss, as well as the latest therapeutic strategies to overcome them.

RECENT FINDINGS

Using ex-vivo perfusion models of porcine lungs with human blood, the use of genetically modified pig lungs along with novel pharmaceutical approaches has recently been studied. Strategies that have demonstrated improved lung survival include the knockout of known xenoantigens (GalTKO and N-glycolylneuraminic acid-KO), genes that regulate complement activation (hCD46 and hCD55), as well as the inflammation/coagulation cascade (human leukocyte antigen-E, human thrombomodulin, human endothelial protein C receptor, hCD47, hCD39, hCD73 and heme oxygenase-1). Furthermore, pharmacologic interventions including the depletion of pulmonary intravascular macrophages or von Willebrand factor, inhibition of thromboxane synthase and blockade of histamine receptors have also demonstrated protective effects on xeno lung grafts. Using in-vivo pig to nonhuman primate lung transplant models, these approaches have been shown to extend pulmonary xenograft survival to 5 days.

SUMMARY

The development of new multitransgenic GalTKO pigs has demonstrated prolongation of porcine xenograft survival; however, advancement in XLTx has remained frustratingly limited. Further intensive and innovative strategies including genetic manipulation of donors, as well as inflammation/coagulation dysregulation, are required to make XLTx a clinical possibility.

Immune cells in a heterotopic lamb-to-pig bronchial xenograft model

We developed our porcine model to elucidate the cellular rejection mechanisms of xenografts. Bronchial segments from a donor lamb were implanted into domestic pigs. The immunosuppressive regimens consisted of no immusuppression, or of daily oral cyclosporine A (CsA) 15 mg/kg, or of everolimus, 1.5 mg/kg, or of both. Implants were serially harvested during 17 days. Epithelial damage and obliteration were graded histologically, followed by a count of CD4+, CD8+, MHC class II-expressing cells, and macrophages. Furthermore, we studied the pharmocokinetics of everolismus. Epithelial damage preceded luminal obliteration, which was eventually total, except when both drugs had been given. In xenografts, an influx of cells with CD8+ cells dominating peaked on day 9, thereafter declining, except in the combination drug group. There, the immunological reaction was delayed and blunted, with CD4+ cells dominating. More macrophages appeared in xenografts than in allografts except with the combination CsA and everolimus. A dose of 1.5 mg/kg everolimus yields adequate blood concentrations for porcine studies. In this xenograft model, chronic rejection appears to be caused by an immune response to the graft, but it is more short-lived than the response in allografts. The combination of CsA and everolimus was able to blunt the response and delay the subsequent obliteration.