Ocular dominance and disparity-sensitivity: why there are cells in the visual cortex driven unequally by the two eyes

A role for ocular dominance in binocular integration

Neurons in the primate primary visual cortex (V1) combine left- and right-eye information to form a binocular output. Controversy surrounds whether ocular dominance, the preference of these neurons for one eye over the other, is functionally relevant. Here, we demonstrate that ocular dominance impacts gain control during binocular combination. We recorded V1 spiking activity while monkeys passively viewed grating stimuli. Gratings were either presented to one eye (monocular), both eyes with the same contrasts (binocular balanced), or both eyes with different contrasts (binocular imbalanced). We found that contrast placed in a neuron's dominant eye was weighted more strongly than contrast placed in a neuron's non-dominant eye. This asymmetry covaried with neurons' ocular dominance. We then tested whether accounting for ocular dominance within divisive normalization improves the fit to neural data. We found that ocular dominance significantly improved model performance, with interocular normalization providing the best fits. These findings suggest that V1 ocular dominance is relevant for response normalization during binocular stimulation.

An Alternative Theory of Binocularity

The fact that seeing with two eyes is universal among vertebrates raises a problem that has long challenged vision scientists: how do animals with overlapping visual fields combine non-identical right and left eye images to achieve fusion and the perception of depth that follows? Most theories address this problem in terms of matching corresponding images on the right and left retinas. Here we suggest an alternative theory of binocular vision based on anatomical correspondence that circumvents the correspondence problem and provides a rationale for ocular dominance.

Binocular neurons in parastriate cortex: interocular 'matching' of receptive field properties, eye dominance and strength of silent suppression

Spike-responses of single binocular neurons were recorded from a distinct part of primary visual cortex, the parastriate cortex (cytoarchitectonic area 18) of anaesthetized and immobilized domestic cats. Functional identification of neurons was based on the ratios of phase-variant (F1) component to the mean firing rate (F0) of their spike-responses to optimized (orientation, direction, spatial and temporal frequencies and size) sine-wave-luminance-modulated drifting grating patches presented separately via each eye. In over 95% of neurons, the interocular differences in the phase-sensitivities (differences in F1/F0 spike-response ratios) were small (≤0.3) and in over 80% of neurons, the interocular differences in preferred orientations were ≤10°. The interocular correlations of the direction selectivity indices and optimal spatial frequencies, like those of the phase sensitivies and optimal orientations, were also strong (coefficients of correlation r ≥0.7005). By contrast, the interocular correlations of the optimal temporal frequencies, the diameters of summation areas of the excitatory responses and suppression indices were weak (coefficients of correlation r ≤0.4585). In cells with high eye dominance indices (HEDI cells), the mean magnitudes of suppressions evoked by stimulation of silent, extra-classical receptive fields via the non-dominant eyes, were significantly greater than those when the stimuli were presented via the dominant eyes. We argue that the well documented ‘eye-origin specific’ segregation of the lateral geniculate inputs underpinning distinct eye dominance columns in primary visual cortices of mammals with frontally positioned eyes (distinct eye dominance columns), combined with significant interocular differences in the strength of silent suppressive fields, putatively contribute to binocular stereoscopic vision.

A reaction-diffusion model to capture disparity selectivity in primary visual cortex

Decades of experimental studies are available on disparity selective cells in visual cortex of macaque and cat. Recently, local disparity map for iso-orientation sites for near-vertical edge preference is reported in area 18 of cat visual cortex. No experiment is yet reported on complete disparity map in V1. Disparity map for layer IV in V1 can provide insight into how disparity selective complex cell receptive field is organized from simple cell subunits. Though substantial amounts of experimental data on disparity selective cells is available, no model on receptive field development of such cells or disparity map development exists in literature. We model disparity selectivity in layer IV of cat V1 using a reaction-diffusion two-eye paradigm. In this model, the wiring between LGN and cortical layer IV is determined by resource an LGN cell has for supporting connections to cortical cells and competition for target space in layer IV. While competing for target space, the same type of LGN cells, irrespective of whether it belongs to left-eye-specific or right-eye-specific LGN layer, cooperate with each other while trying to push off the other type. Our model captures realistic 2D disparity selective simple cell receptive fields, their response properties and disparity map along with orientation and ocular dominance maps. There is lack of correlation between ocular dominance and disparity selectivity at the cell population level. At the map level, disparity selectivity topography is not random but weakly clustered for similar preferred disparities. This is similar to the experimental result reported for macaque. The details of weakly clustered disparity selectivity map in V1 indicate two types of complex cell receptive field organization.

A micro-architecture for binocular disparity and ocular dominance in visual cortex

In invertebrate predators like the praying mantis and vertebrate predators such as wild cats, the ability to detect small differences in inter-ocular retinal disparities is a critical means for accurately determining the depth of moving objects such as prey1. In mammals, the first neurons along the visual pathway that encode binocular disparities are found in the visual cortex. However, a precise functional architecture for binocular disparity has never been demonstrated in any species, and coarse maps for disparity have been found in only one primate species2,3. Moreover, the dominant approach for assaying the developmental plasticity of binocular cortical neurons employed monocular tests of ocular dominance to infer binocular function4. The few studies that examined the relationship between ocular dominance and binocular disparity of individual cells used single-unit recordings and have provided conflicting results as to whether ocular dominance can predict the selectivity or sensitivity to binocular disparity5–9. Here we use two-photon calcium imaging to sample the response to monocular and binocular visual stimuli from nearly every adjacent neuron in a small region of the cat visual cortex, area 18. We show that local circuits for ocular dominance always have smooth and graded transitions from one apparently monocular functional domain to an adjacent binocular region. Most unexpectedly, we discovered a new map in the cat visual cortex that had a precise functional micro-architecture for binocular disparity selectivity. At the level of single cells, ocular dominance was unrelated to binocular disparity selectivity or sensitivity. When the local maps for ocular dominance and binocular disparity both had measurable gradients at a given cortical site, the two gradient directions were orthogonal to each other. Together, these results suggest that from the perspective of the spiking activity of individual neurons, ocular dominance cannot predict binocular disparity tuning. However, the precise local arrangement of ocular dominance and binocular disparity maps provide new clues on how monocular and binocular depth cues may be combined and decoded.

The cortical column: a structure without a function

This year, the field of neuroscience celebrates the 50th anniversary of Mountcastle's discovery of the cortical column. In this review, we summarize half a century of research and come to the disappointing realization that the column may have no function. Originally, it was described as a discrete structure, spanning the layers of the somatosensory cortex, which contains cells responsive to only a single modality, such as deep joint receptors or cutaneous receptors. Subsequently, examples of columns have been uncovered in numerous cortical areas, expanding the original concept to embrace a variety of different structures and principles. A "column" now refers to cells in any vertical cluster that share the same tuning for any given receptive field attribute. In striate cortex, for example, cells with the same eye preference are grouped into ocular dominance columns. Unaccountably, ocular dominance columns are present in some species, but not others. In principle, it should be possible to determine their function by searching for species differences in visual performance that correlate with their presence or absence. Unfortunately, this approach has been to no avail; no visual faculty has emerged that appears to require ocular dominance columns. Moreover, recent evidence has shown that the expression of ocular dominance columns can be highly variable among members of the same species, or even in different portions of the visual cortex in the same individual. These observations deal a fatal blow to the idea that ocular dominance columns serve a purpose. More broadly, the term "column" also denotes the periodic termination of anatomical projections within or between cortical areas. In many instances, periodic projections have a consistent relationship with some architectural feature, such as the cytochrome oxidase patches in V1 or the stripes in V2. These tissue compartments appear to divide cells with different receptive field properties into distinct processing streams. However, it is unclear what advantage, if any, is conveyed by this form of columnar segregation. Although the column is an attractive concept, it has failed as a unifying principle for understanding cortical function. Unravelling the organization of the cerebral cortex will require a painstaking description of the circuits, projections and response properties peculiar to cells in each of its various areas.

Ocular dominance predicts neither strength nor class of disparity selectivity with random-dot stimuli in primate V1

We address two unresolved issues concerning the coding of binocular disparity in primary visual cortex. Experimental studies and theoretical models have suggested a relationship between a cell's ocular dominance, assessed with monocular stimuli, and its tuning to binocular disparity. First, the disparity energy model of disparity selectivity suggests that there should be a correlation between ocular dominance and the strength of disparity tuning. Second, several studies have reported a relationship between ocular dominance and the shape of the disparity tuning curve, with cells dominated by one eye more likely to have disparity tuning of the tuned-inhibitory type. We investigated both of these relationships in single neurons recorded from the primary visual cortex of awake fixating macaques, using dynamic random-dot patterns as a stimulus. To classify disparity tuning curves quantitatively, we develop a new measure of symmetry, which can be applied to any function. We find no evidence for any correlation between ocular dominance and the nature of disparity tuning. This places constraints on the circuitry underlying disparity tuning.

Binocular interaction and sensitivity to horizontal disparity in visual cortex in the awake monkey

We evaluated the binocular interaction and horizontal disparity sensitivity in neurons recorded from macaque visual cortex. Neurons from V1 of three awake Macaca mulatta monkeys were isolated by means of extracellular recording and tested for disparity sensitivity with dynamic random dot stereograms. Neurons sensitive to horizontal disparities were stimulated both monocularly and binocularly with flashing bars and their responses quantified. ANOVA and regression tests were used for data analysis. Sixty-six cells out of 185 (66/185, 36%) showed sensitivity to horizontal disparity. Disparity sensitive cells were grouped into near (25/66, 38%), tuned inhibitory (16/66, 24%), far (13/66, 20%) and tuned excitatory (12/66, 18%). Receptive fields of tuned cells were located more centrally in the visual field than those of near and far cells. The binocular interaction in tuned inhibitory cells increased linearly along with ocular unbalance. Most of tuned excitatory cells (10/12, 83%) showed facilitatory binocular interaction, characterized by a stronger response to binocular stimulation than to the stimulation of the dominant eye. On the contrary, most of tuned inhibitory cells (14/16, 88%) showed suppressory binocular interaction, characterized by a weaker response to binocular stimulation than to the stimulation of the dominant eye. Near and far cells showed both types of interaction in similar percentages. The binocular response showed a linear relationship with the sum of both monocular responses in tuned excitatory, tuned inhibitory and near cells, but not in far cells. Sensitivity to horizontal disparity may be a result of facilitatory and suppressive interactions between left and right inputs.

Interocular temporal delay sensitivity in the visual cortex of the awake monkey

Due to the separation of the eyes, temporal retinal disparities are created during binocular stimulation and they have been proposed to be the basis of several stereo-visual effects. This paper studies the sensitivity of cortical neurons from area V1 to interocular temporal delay in the awake monkey (Macaca mulatta). Forty-four cells were included in this study. Temporal delay sensitivity was observed in 59% of them. About half of these temporal-delay-sensitive cells were also sensitive to the stimulation sequence of the eyes. The cells that preferred one eye to be stimulated first were termed asymmetrical (46%); those which were not sensitive to the eye sequence of stimulation were termed symmetrical (54%). No clear differences were observed in the distribution of delay-sensitive cells according to their eye dominance. Fifty-six percent of balanced cells and 65% of unbalanced cells were sensitive to interocular delay. These data underline the importance of temporal cues for depth perception.

Neural mechanisms underlying stereoscopic vision

The progressive frontalization of both eyes in mammals causes overlap of the left and right visual fields, having as a consequence a region of binocular field with single vision and stereopsis. The horizontal separation of the eyes makes the retinal images of the objects lying in this binocular field have slight horizontal and vertical differences, termed disparities. Horizontal disparities are the main cue for stereopsis. In the past decades numerous physiological studies made on monkeys, which have in many aspects a similar visual system to humans, showed that a population of visual cells are capable of encoding the amplitude and sign of horizontal disparity. Such disparity detectors were found in cortical visual areas V1, V2, V3, V3A, VP, MT (V5) and MST of monkeys and in the superior colliculus of the cat and opossum. According to their disparity tuning function, these cells were first grouped into tuned excitatory, tuned inhibitory, near and far sub-groups. Subsequent studies added two more categories, tuned near and tuned far cells. Asymmetries between left and right receptive field position, on and off regions, and intra-receptive field wiring are believed to be the neural mechanisms of disparity detection. Because horizontal disparity alone is insufficient to compute reliable stereopsis, additional information about fixation distance and angle of gaze is required. Thus, while there is unequivocal evidence of cells capable of detecting horizontal disparities, it is not known how horizontal disparity is calibrated. Sensitivity to vertical disparity and information about the vergence angle or eye position may be the source of this additional information.

Binocular combination of contrast signals by striate cortical neurons in the monkey

With the use of microelectrode recording techniques, we investigated how the contrast signals from the two eyes are combined in individual cortical neurons in the striate cortex of anesthetized and paralyzed macaque monkeys. For a given neuron, the optimal spatial frequency, orientation, and direction of drift for sine wave grating stimuli were determined for each eye. The cell's disparity tuning characteristics were determined by measuring responses as a function of the relative interocular spatial phase of dichoptic stimuli that consisted of the optimal monocular gratings. Binocular contrast summation was then investigated by measuring contrast response functions for optimal dichoptic grating pairs that had left- to right-eye interocular contrast ratios that varied from 0.1 to 10. The goal was to determine the left- and right-eye contrast components required to produce a criterion threshold response. For all functional classes of cortical neurons and for both cooperative and antagonistic binocular interactions, there was a linear relationship between the left- and right-eye contrast components required to produce a threshold response. Thus, for example for cooperative binocular interactions, a reduction in contrast to one eye was counterbalanced by an equivalent increase in contrast to the other eye. These results showed that in simple cells and phase-specific complex cells, the contrast signals from the two eyes were linearly combined at the subunit level before nonlinear rectification. In non-phase-specific complex cells, the linear binocular convergence of contrast signals could have taken place either before or after the rectification process, but before spike generation. In addition, for simple cells, vector analysis of spatial summation showed that the inputs from the two eyes were also combined in a linear manner before nonlinear spike-generating mechanisms. Thus simple cells showed linear spatial summation not only within and between subregions in a given receptive field, but also between the left- and right-eye receptive fields. Overall, the results show that the effectiveness of a stimulus in producing a response reflects interocular differences in the relative balance of inputs to a given cell, however, the eye of origin of a light-evoked signal has no specific consequence.

A correlational model for the development of disparity selectivity in visual cortex that depends on prenatal and postnatal phases

Neurons in the visual cortex require correlated binocular activity during a critical period early in life to develop normal response properties. We present a model for how the disparity selectivity of cortical neurons might arise during development. The model is based on Hebbian mechanisms for plasticity at synapses between geniculocortical neurons and cortical cells. The model is driven by correlated activity in retinal ganglion cells within each eye before birth and additionally between eyes after birth. With no correlations present between the eyes, the cortical model developed only monocular cells. Adding a small amount of correlation between eyes at the beginning of development produced cortical neurons that were entirely binocular and tuned to zero disparity. However, if an initial phase of purely same-eye correlations was followed by a second phase of development that included correlations between eyes, the cortical model became populated with both monocular and binocular cells. Moreover, in the two-phase model, binocular cells tended to be selective for zero disparity, whereas the more monocular cells tended to have nonzero disparity. This relationship between ocular dominance and disparity has been observed in the visual cortex of the cat by other workers. Differences in the relative timing of the two developmental phases could account for the higher proportion of monocular cells found in the visual cortices of other animals.

Binocular interaction and disparity coding in area 19 of visual cortex in normal and split-chiasm cats

Binocular disparity, resulting from the projection of a three-dimensional object on the two spatially separated retinae, constitutes one of the principal cues for stereoscopic perception. The binocularity of cells in one hemisphere stems from two sources: (1) the ganglion cells in the homonymous temporal and nasal hemiretinae and (2) the contralateral hemisphere via the corpus callosum (CC). The objectives of this study were, on one hand, to determine whether disparity-sensitive cells are present in a "higher order" area, namely area 19 of the visual cortex, of the cat and, on the other hand, to ascertain whether the CC contributes to the formation of these cells. As in areas 17-18, two types of disparity-sensitive neurons were found: one type, showing maximal interactive effects around zero disparity, responded with strong excitation or inhibition when the stimuli presented independently to the two eyes were in register. These neurons are presumed to signal stimuli situated about the fixation plane. The other type, also made up of two subtypes of opposed valencies, gave maximum responses at one set of disparities and inhibitory responses to the other set. These are presumed to signal stimuli situated in front of or behind the fixation plane. Unlike areas 17-18, however, disparity-sensitive cells in area 19 of the normal cat were less finely tuned and their proportion was lower. In the split-chiasm animal, very few cells were sensitive to disparity. These results, when coupled with behavioral data obtained with destriate animals, indicate that (1) area 19 is probably less involved in the analysis of disparity information than area 17, (2) the disparity-sensitive neurons that are sensitive to disparity are not involved in the resolution of very fine three-dimensional spatial detail, and (3) the CC only determines a limited number of these cells in the absence of normal binocular input.

Properties of area 17/18 border neurons contributing to the visual transcallosal pathway in the cat

In a series of physiological experiments, a total of 203 neurons at the Area 17/18 border were recorded with a callosal link either demonstrated by antidromic or transsynaptic activation from stimulating electrodes located in the homotopic contralateral hemisphere (CH), or in the splenial segment of the corpus callosum (CC). Forty-four percent of the transcallosal cells could also be driven from stimulating electrodes in or just above the lateral geniculate nucleus (OR1). The majority (69%) of transcallosal neurons were classifiable as belonging to the complex family (B and C cells) and most of these were found in the supragranular laminae and in lamina 4A. The ocular dominance distribution of transcallosal cells was trimodal, consisting of roughly equal numbers of monocularly dominated and binocularly balanced neurons. Estimates of conduction time and synaptic delay were obtained for neurons driven from CH, CC, and from OR1, and in most instances the response latency was short enough to suggest a monosynaptic input from either the ipsi- or contra-lateral hemisphere. The distribution of transcallosal conduction times showed that S cells, as a class, had significantly faster conduction than cells of the complex family but otherwise there was no obvious signs of multimodality in the distribution curve. An analysis of the synaptic delays in transcallosal activation produced a mean of 0.6 to 0.7 ms but some were too short to be consistent with a transsynaptic drive, suggesting that some cells with an antidromic drive may have been included in the transsynaptic category. Results are interpreted in terms of the contribution made by the corpus callosum to stereoscopic vision.

Cyclopean tilt aftereffects can be induced monocularly: is there a purely binocular process?

A series of experiments have been reported by Wolfe and Held which they have taken as evidence for the existence of more than one binocular process in human vision, specifically a simple binocular process (OR-gate) and a purely binocular process (AND-gate). In one of their studies, it was shown that tilt aftereffects induced with cyclopean stimuli produced measurable effects only when testing was binocular, which suggested that cyclopean adaptation affects only the AND-gate mechanism. If the two alleged mechanisms (AND or OR) are independent, monocular adaptation with luminance contrast stimuli should produce aftereffects which can only be measured with luminance contrast test stimuli. Cyclopean test displays would probe only the unadapted AND-mechanism. Results to the contrary are reported, casting doubt upon the functional independence, perhaps even the existence, of the so-called purely binocular process.

The influence of transcortical relationships on visual responses in rats

Visual responses of the 17/18 border of one hemisphere in anesthetized rats were studied while the opposite cortex was depressed. The depression of the opposite cortex was achieved by a cryoblockade of the homotopic area or by bleaching the unstimulated eye. In the first series of experiments field potentials were recorded, whereas in the second experimental series tests were carried out on single units. Bleaching the unstimulated eye produced mostly an enhancement of long latency potentials recorded in deeper layers. Cryoblockade of the contralateral cortex depressed the responses in a more uniform fashion. Most units typically presented a weaker evoked firing after cryoblockade. However, in some neurons the reaction to the treatment depended upon the nature of the stimulus and other units lost their orientation specificity. A single explanation such as a tonic excitatory transcortical influence is insufficient to account for these results.

A physiological correlate of the Pulfrich effect in cortical neurons of the cat

When a swinging pendulum is viewed with a light-attenuating filter before one eye, the pendulum bob is perceived to move in an elliptical path in depth. It is believed that the filter causes this illusion, the Pulfrich effect, by delaying processing of the image in the filtered eye relative to that of the unfiltered eye. We sought a physiological correlate of this effect by studying binocular integration in cortical neurons of cats while they viewed moving stimuli. Special attention was focused on single unit disparity tuning because it is widely believed that depth perception is related to the responses of disparity selective neurons in visual cortex. We found that placing a filter before one of the cat's eyes produced a temporal delay in the cortical response. The temporal delay was always associated with a shift in the neuron's spatial disparity tuning. The observed temporal delays and disparity shifts are comparable with the magnitude of the Pulfrich effect in humans.

Development of the kitten visual cortex depends on the relationship between the plane of eye movements and visual inputs

1. Previous experiments have demonstrated that eye movements, acting through the extraocular muscle (EOM) proprioceptive afferents, are necessary for the development of orientation selectivity in the cells of the kitten visual cortex. New experiments were carried out to study the effect of the plane of eye movements on the preferred orientation acquired by the visual cortical cells. 2. Dark-reared (DR) kittens were operated on at 5-6 weeks of age. In the first series of experiments, 4 out of the 6 EOMs were removed bilaterally in such a way that both eyes could only move in a single plane, either vertical or horizontal. In the second series of experiments, the same operation was performed on one eye which was also sutured shut and, on the other side, the EOM were deafferented by intracranial section of the ophthalmic branch of Vth nerve and the eye left open. 3. 1-4 days after surgery the kittens were given 6 h of visual experience and 12 h later were prepared for visual cell recording in Area 17. 4. In kittens of the first series: orientation selectivity developed in the majority (60-65%) of visual cells, most of which encoded horizontal orientations when the eyes had moved in the vertical plane and vertical orientations when the eyes had moved in the horizontal plane. These results show that the plane of eye movements during early visual experience influences the distribution of preferred orientations with an orthogonal relation. Ocular dominance histograms were "strabismic like". 5. In kittens of the second series: orientation selectivity developed in 40-50% of cells, about half of which were tuned for the orientation orthogonal to the direction of movement of the occluded eye, as in experiment I. The seeing, deafferented eye, presumably would have sent normal visual inputs centrally, corresponding to displacements on the retina in every direction since the ocular motility of that eye had not been disturbed. However, proprioceptive information about its movements was suppressed. As only some of the EOMs of the occluded eye were still present and connected, the conclusion is that the observed influence of the plane of eye movements acts through the proprioceptive afferents.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex

The orientation selectivity, ocular dominance, and binocular disparity tuning of 272 cells in areas 17 and 18 of barbiturate-anesthetized, paralyzed cats were studied with automated, quantitative techniques. Disparity was varied along the axis orthogonal to each cell's best orientation. Binocular correspondence was established by means of a reference electrode positioned at the boundary of lamina A and A1 in the area centralis representation of the lateral geniculate nucleus. Measures were derived that expressed each cell's disparity sensitivity and best disparity and the shape and slope of its tuning curve. Cells were found that corresponded to categories described by previous authors ("disparity-insensitive," "tuned excitatory," "near," and "far" cells), but many others had intermediate response patterns, or patterns that were difficult to categorize. Quantitative analysis suggested that the various types belong to a continuum. No relationship could be established between a cell's best orientation and its ocular dominance or any aspect of its disparity tuning. There was no relationship between a cell's ocular dominance and its sensitivity to disparity. Ocular dominance and best disparity were related. As reported by others, cells with best disparities close to zero (the fixation plane) tended to have balanced ocularity, while cells with best disparities in the near or far range had a broad distribution of ocular dominance. Among cells with receptive fields near the vertical meridian, those preferring far disparities tended to be dominated by the contralateral eye, and those preferring near disparities by the ipsilateral eye. It is suggested that this relationship follows from the geometry of near and far images and the pattern of decussation in the visual pathway. There was a significant grouping of cells with similar best disparities along tangential electrode tracks. We believe that this grouping is due to the columnar organization for ocular dominance and the relationship between ocular dominance and best disparity. No evidence was found for a columnar segregation of disparity-sensitive and disparity-insensitive cells.

Mechanisms for binocular depth sensitivity along the vertical meridian of the visual field

By removing the visual cortex unilaterally, and recording along the intact 17/18 border, we have investigated the influence of the corpus callosum on the tuning curves for stimulus disparity of cat cortical neurons. Responses to binocular stimulation were examined to movement in the same (in-phase) and in the opposite direction (antiphase) across the two retinae. In lesioned cats, as in normal cats, units were encountered which showed high sensitivity and narrow tuning for stimulus disparity. In contrast to normal cats, however, lesioned cats showed a reduced proportion of units displaying moderate binocular interactions, as well as a substantial increase in disparity-insensitive cells. The loss of disparity sensitivity after decortication was associated with a reduced incidence of both selectivity for the direction of stimulus motion and binocular activation. No large differences between the preparations were seen, however, in the ocular dominance of the total populations of cells. Differences between the normal and lesioned cats were found in binocular responses to in-phase but not to antiphase stimulation motion. Tuning curves in lesioned cats showed reduced binocular inhibition but no changes in binocular facilitation. Our findings indicate that callosal input contributes to unit disparity sensitivity by enhancing direction-selective binocular inhibition. The corpus callosum generates disparity sensitivity in a population of units in the superficial cortical layers which may play a particular role in the perception of stereoscopic depth.