Delayed emesis following anticancer chemotherapy

Diazepam diminishes temozolomide efficacy in the treatment of U87 glioblastoma cell line

AIMS

Many patients with glioblastoma (GBM) suffer from comorbid neurological/psychiatric disorders and, therefore, are treated with psychopharmacological agents. Diazepam (DIA) is widely adopted to treat status epilepticus, alleviate anxiety, and inhibit chemotherapy-associated delayed emesis in GBM patients. Even though temozolomide (TMZ) and DIA could be found as possible combination therapy in clinical practice, there are no reports of their combined effects in GBM. Hence, it may be of interest to investigate whether DIA enhances the antitumor efficacy of TMZ in GBM cells.

METHODS

U87 human GBM was used to examine the effects of combined TMZ and DIA on cell viability, and the oxygen consumption within the cells, in order to evaluate mitochondrial bioenergetic response upon the treatment.

RESULTS

The cooperative index showed the presence of antagonism between TMZ and DIA, which was confirmed on long-term observation. Moreover, the level of apoptosis after the TMZ treatment was significantly decreased when administered with DIA (p < 0.001). Concomitant use of TMZ and DIA increased the basal cell respiration rate, the oxidative phosphorylation rate, and maximal capacity of mitochondrial electron transport chain, as well as the activities of complexes I and II, vs. TMZ alone (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Comparing our results with data reported that DIA elicits cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase and favors senescence reveals that DIA diminishes TMZ efficacy in concomitant use in the treatment of GBM. However, due to its great potency to hinder GBM proliferation and metabolism, it could be considered using DIA as maintenance therapy after TMZ cycles.

[A clinical analysis of 10 cases with cardiac lymphoma]

目的

分析心脏淋巴瘤的发病情况、临床特征、治疗效果及预后。

方法

收集2000年1月至2016年6月期间确诊并有心脏累及的10例淋巴瘤患者的资料，对患者的一般资料、临床表现、病理诊断、实验室检查、心脏累及方式、心脏并发症、治疗方式、疗效及预后进行分析。

结果

3 918例淋巴瘤患者中，心脏累及者10例，其中原发性心脏淋巴瘤（PCL）1例（主要累及左右心房，以心肌内多发结节包块为主），继发性心脏淋巴瘤（SCL）9例（主要为心包包块，其中出现心包积液5例，心肌肿块2例）。男性6例，女性4例，中位年龄55（19~88）岁，主要临床表现为呼吸困难7例，胸痛5例，乏力、水肿各2例。病理类型包括弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤（DLBCL）7例，T淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤、霍奇金淋巴瘤、Burkitt淋巴瘤各1例。心脏并发症包括充血性心力衰竭7例，心律失常4例（主要为窦性心动过速、心房颤动和房室传导阻滞）。除1例高龄、一般状况差未接受治疗外，其余9例患者均接受治疗（单纯化疗4例，化疗联合放疗5例）。中位随访时间为9（1~28）个月。1例PCL患者化疗后获部分缓解（PR），无进展生存（PFS）期为6个月，总生存（OS）期为21个月。SCL患者中6例起病累及心脏者，治疗后1例获完全缓解，5例获PR，中位PFS期为5个月，中位OS期为19个月；3例病情进展累及心脏者，2例治疗后获PR，1例未治疗者死亡，中位PFS期为4个月，OS因数据截尾，未能获得。

结论

心脏淋巴瘤为少见类型，DLBCL为最常见类型，呼吸困难、胸痛为最常见临床表现，并易出现充血性心力衰竭和心律失常，治疗以系统化疗为主，总体预后差。

WITHDRAWN: Serotonin receptor antagonists for highly emetogenic chemotherapy in adults

This review is now out of date although it is correct as of the date of publication. The latest version of this review (available in ‘Other versions’ tab on The Cochrane Library) may still be useful to readers.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Consensus recommendations for the prevention of vomiting and nausea following high-emetic-risk chemotherapy

In this update of our 2005 document, we used an evidence-based approach whenever possible to formulate recommendations, emphasizing the results of controlled trials concerning the best use of antiemetic agents for the prevention of emesis and nausea following anticancer chemotherapies of high emetic risk. A three-drug combination of a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor (5-HT(3)) receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and aprepitant beginning before chemotherapy and continuing for up to 4 days remains the standard of care. We address issues of dose, schedule, and route of administration of five selective 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists. We conclude that, for each of these five drugs, there is a plateau in therapeutic efficacy above which further dose escalation does not improve outcome. In trials designed to prove the equivalence of palonosetron to ondansetron and granisetron, palonosetron proved superior in emesis prevention, while adverse effects were comparable. Furthermore, for all classes of antiemetic agents, a single dose is as effective as multiple doses or a continuous infusion. The oral route is as efficacious as the intravenous route of administration.

Serotonin receptor antagonists for highly emetogenic chemotherapy in adults

BACKGROUND

Serotonin receptor antagonists (5-HT(3) RAs) are used to control chemotherapy-induced emesis. Although they have the same general mechanism of action (blockade of serotonin receptors), they have different chemical structures and may have different effects.

OBJECTIVES

To compare efficacy of different serotonin receptor antagonists (5-HT(3) RAs) in the control of acute and delayed emesis induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, the Specialised Register of the Cochrane PaPaS Group, PubMed, EMBASE, and LILACS databases. Our most recent search was in March 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing 5-HT(3) RAs in an adult cancer population.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted information from the included studies on the control of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting, either as a single or a combined outcome. Where appropriate, we combined the results of similar trials. We carried out sensitivity and subgroup analyses to test the robustness of our findings.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 randomised trials (7808 participants). Nine of the trials compared granisetron versus ondansetron. No other drug comparison was studied in more than one trial. The meta-analyses of the granisetron versus ondansetron trials found similar results for the two drugs on acute vomiting (eight trials, 4256 participants, odds ratio (OR) 0.89; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.02), acute nausea (seven trials, 4160 participants, OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.10), delayed vomiting (three trials, 1119 participants, OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.34) and delayed nausea (two trials, 1024 participants, OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.24). Granisetron and ondansetron showed similar effects on headache and diarrhoea, with the possible exception of less constipation associated with ondansetron.One study of 1114 participants comparing palonosetron plus dexamethasone versus granisetron plus dexamethasone showed superiority of palonosetron in controlling delayed vomiting (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.85) and delayed nausea (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.10). Complete response for delayed nausea and vomiting was also in favour of the combination palonosetron and dexamethasone (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.07).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Ondansetron and granisetron appear to be equivalent drugs for the prevention of acute and delayed emesis following the use of highly emetogenic chemotherapy.According to one single trial the combination of palonosetron and dexamethasone was superior to granisetron and dexamethasone in controlling delayed emesis. However, more evidence is needed before palonosetron could become the candidate 5-HT(3) RA for the control of delayed emesis induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

Action of cyclooxygenase inhibitors and a leukotriene biosynthesis inhibitor on cisplatin-induced acute and delayed emesis in the ferret

Cisplatin at 5 mg/kg, i.p. induced an acute (day 1) and delayed (days 2 and 3) emetic response in the ferret that was used to investigate the anti-emetic activity of the non-selective cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (3 - 30 mg/kg, i.p., three times per day) and two cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, DFU [5,5-dimethyl-3-(3-fluorophenyl)-4-(4-methylsulphonyl)phenyl-2(5H)-furanone; 1 - 10 mg/kg, i.p. administered at 40 and 48 h] and L-745,337 [5-methanesulphonamido-6-(2,4-diflurothiophenyl)-1-indanone; 10 mg/kg, i.p., administered at 40 and 48 h]. Only indomethacin potentiated significantly cisplatin-induced retching + vomiting (P<0.05); DFU antagonized delayed emesis (P<0.05) but the action was not dose-related and L-745,337 was inactive (P>0.05). However, indomethacin alone (30 mg/kg) also induced emesis (P<0.05). The leukotriene biosynthesis inhibitor, MK-886 {3-[1-(p-chlorobenzyl)-5-(isopropyl)-3-tert-butylthioindol-2-yl]-2,2-dimethylpropanoic acid; 1 - 10 mg/kg, i.p., three times per day} had no action to modify cisplatin-induced emesis (P>0.05). The combination treatment of indomethacin (10 mg/kg, i.p., three times per day) with MK-886 (10 mg/kg, i.p., three times per day) did not antagonize cisplatin-induced acute delayed retching + vomiting and had a different profile compared to the action of dexamethasone (1 mg/kg, i.p., three times per day; P<0.05). Inhibition of the cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase pathways does not account for the anti-emetic of dexamethasone.

American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: update 2006

PURPOSE

To update the 1999 American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology.

UPDATE METHODOLOGY

The Update Committee completed a review and analysis of data published from 1998 thru February 2006. The literature review focused on published randomized controlled trials, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses of published phase II and phase III randomized controlled trials.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The three-drug combination of a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT(3)) serotonin receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and aprepitant is recommended before chemotherapy of high emetic risk. For persons receiving chemotherapy of high emetic risk, there is no group of patients for whom agents of lower therapeutic index are appropriate first-choice antiemetics. These agents should be reserved for patients intolerant of or refractory to 5-HT3 serotonin receptor antagonists, neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists, and dexamethasone. The three-drug combination of a 5-HT3 receptor serotonin antagonist, dexamethasone, and aprepitant is recommended for patients receiving an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide. For patients receiving other chemotherapy of moderate emetic risk, the Update Committee continues to recommend the two-drug combination of a 5-HT3 receptor serotonin antagonist and dexamethasone. In all patients receiving cisplatin and all other agents of high emetic risk, the two-drug combination of dexamethasone and aprepitant is recommended for the prevention of delayed emesis. The Update Committee no longer recommends the combination of a 5-HT3 serotonin receptor antagonist and dexamethasone for the prevention of delayed emesis after chemotherapeutic agents of high emetic risk. CONCLUSION The Update Committee recommends that clinicians administer antiemetics while considering patients' emetic risk categories and other characteristics.

Acute and delayed nausea and emesis control in pediatric oncology patients

BACKGROUND

To the authors' knowledge there is little information available regarding the effectiveness of standard antiemetic therapy among cancer patients who receive emetogenic chemotherapy in clinical practice, especially in the pediatric population. The current study was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of standard antiemetic interventions among children receiving emetogenic chemotherapy.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of antiemetic surveys for children who received emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients and/or their parents were surveyed for acute and delayed nausea and emesis after each course of emetogenic chemotherapy. The survey consisted of validated measures of the severity of nausea and emesis. Complete protection (CP) rates were calculated for each chemotherapy regimen during both the acute and delayed phases and also by gender and age group (ages birth-3 yrs, 4-11 yrs, and 12-20 yrs). Antiemetic therapy consisted of intravenous ondansetron administered once daily during chemotherapy either alone (for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy) or in combination with dexamethasone (for severely emetogenic chemotherapy).

RESULTS

In total, 224 different patients completed 1256 surveys. CP from both acute and delayed nausea and emesis was more likely in the children ages birth-3 years than in older children. For moderately emetogenic regimens, nausea and emesis in the acute and delayed phases were controlled well. Among severely emetogenic chemotherapy regimens, 7 of 12 different regimen types had CP rates < 50% in either the acute phase or the delayed phase. CP rates were particularly low for cisplatin-based and cyclophosphamide-based regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Nausea and emesis remain significant problems among children who receive emetogenic chemotherapy. CP rates were associated significantly with patient age, and higher rates were observed among very young children.

The antiemetic effect of a novel tropisetron patch in anticancer agents-induced kaolin pica model using rats

The efficacy of a novel transdermal patch containing tropisetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT(3)) receptor antagonist, against emesis induced by anticancer agents were evaluated, in comparison with the effect of traditional tropisetron injection, in rats. The antiemetic effects were assessed via the inhibitory activity on the anticancer agent-induced kaolin-consuming behavior, a pica model representing vomiting in emesis-resistant rodents. The tropisetron patch (10mg/patch, 3.5cm(2)) was attached on the shaved back area of rats. Eight h later, each anticancer agent, cisplatin (10mg/kg, i.v.), cyclophosphamide (200mg/kg, i.p.) or doxorubicin (8mg/kg, i.v.), was administered, and thereafter, daily kaolin consumption was measured for 3 days. In comparison, the effect of daily injection of tropisetron (2mg/kg, i.v.), given 10min, 24 and 48h after the anticancer agent administration, was also evaluated. Kaolin intake greatly increased to 21, 17 and 10 folds of control ingestion on the first day after administration with the anticancer agents, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, respectively, and then gradually decreased to near control level on day 3. Such anticancer agent-induced increases in the kaolin consumption were remarkably attenuated by the attachment of tropisetron patch, resulting in the reduction to half levels, which is comparable to the efficacy of daily tropisetron injection. In particular, the blood concentration of tropisetron following patch attachment reached a maximum level of 30-40ng/ml in 12h and exhibited a plateau until detachment of the patch, in contrast to a rapid elimination with a half-life of 2.21h after injection of the drug. Taken together, it is suggested that the novel tropisetron patch could be a promising regimen for the relief of emesis, based on the long-term antiemetic effects on the diverse anticancer agents and the convenience to use the transdermal delivery system for the cancer patients who have difficulty in taking drugs due to surgical operation or gastrointestinal dysfunction.

Effect of chemotherapy on circulating gastrointestinal hormone levels in ovarian cancer patients: relationship to nausea and vomiting

OBJECTIVE

The introduction of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists greatly reduced the problems associated with nausea and vomiting immediately after cancer chemotherapy. However, delayed nausea and vomiting is still a major problem and the underlying mechanism is obscure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied the effect of cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy in 14 ovarian cancer patients on the levels of gastrin and a panel of other hormones as well as glucose and prostaglandin F2a. Blood samples were obtained once daily in the morning before chemotherapy and for 4 days after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Concentrations of many hormones including gastrin were generally high. A pronounced increase in plasma insulin levels occurred on the day after chemotherapy accompanied by a modest increase in plasma glucose concentrations. Minor increases were observed for gastrin, oxytocin and prostaglandin F2a. In contrast, a transient decrease after chemotherapy was observed for motilin. Plasma cortisol decreased markedly after chemotherapy as expected since betamethasone was given as an antiemetic prophylaxis. Certain trends concerning the relationship between some hormones and nausea and vomiting were noted. A high plasma gastrin concentration before chemotherapy was related to delayed vomiting. Relative day-to-day variability of cholecystokinin tended to correlate positively with delayed nausea, whereas an inverse relationship was observed for gastrin variability.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in hormone plasma levels were found but only few could be distinguished as possible mediators of delayed nausea and vomiting.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in routine practice: a European perspective

GOALS OF WORK

The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and its effect on patients' ability to carry out daily life activities following moderately to highly emetogenic, first-cycle chemotherapy in routine practice in cancer centers of four different European countries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, cross-sectional, nonrandomized, self-assessment study in 249 patients enrolled from cancer centers in Spain, Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. The study population consisted of 78% women, with a mean age of 54. Breast, lung, and ovarian cancers made up 75% of all cancers in the study. Patients received a mean of 2.0 chemotherapy agents and 2.5 antiemetic drugs.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 450 emetic episodes experienced by 243 patients was recorded over 5 days following chemotherapy, with an average of 1.8 episodes per patient (range: 0-28). A higher percentage of patients (38%) suffered from delayed compared to acute emesis (13%). Between 42% and 52% of all patients suffered from nausea (visual analogue scale > or = 5 mm) on any one day, peaking at day 3. Using the Functional Living Index for Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire, 75% of patients with nausea and 50% with vomiting reported a negative impact of these conditions on performance of daily living.

CONCLUSIONS

CINV remains a significant problem in routine practice, particularly in the delayed phase posttreatment. Overall, CINV had a negative impact on patients' daily life.

Oral granisetron for the prevention of acute late onset nausea and vomiting in patients treated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the efficacy of oral granisetron 1 mg twice daily for the prevention of late onset nausea and vomiting after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy that includes cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, or doxorubicin.

METHODS

Prior to chemotherapy, patients were stratified by gender and randomized to receive oral granisetron (1 mg tablet twice daily) or prochlorperazine (10 mg sustained release capsule twice daily). Study agents were administered 1 h prior to and 12 h after chemotherapy. Antiemetics were administered for seven consecutive days. Efficacy variables were assessed 48 and 72 h after administration of chemotherapy, and included no emesis, no nausea, no moderate or severe nausea, and no antiemetic rescue. Safety analysis included all patients who received medication.

RESULTS

A total of 230 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis; 119 patients received granisetron and 111 patients received prochlorperazine. Females, and all patients combined, who received granisetron had significantly higher no-emesis rates at 48 h (p =.010 and p =.016, respectively) than patients who received prochlorperazine. No-nausea rates at 48 h were numerically higher for all patients combined and females who received granisetron rather than prochlorperazine. Response rates for no nausea or mild nausea were also numerically higher in females treated with granisetron, compared to prochlorperazine, at 48 h. Significantly more patients (p <.001) and females (p <.001) in the granisetron group than in the prochlorperazine group did not require rescue antiemetics at 48 h. At 72 h, efficacy results were comparable for granisetron and prochlorperazine.

CONCLUSION

Oral granisetron is well tolerated and more effective than prochlorperazine in preventing nausea and vomiting for up to 48 h following treatment with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Cisplatin-induced emesis in the cat: effect of granisetron and dexamethasone

The emetic action of cisplatin was investigated in the cat using a closed circuit video recording system. In initial investigations, cisplatin 3 and 5 mg/kg, i.v. induced emesis over a 2-day period following a latency of 17.6+/-9.6 and 15.6+/-7.8 h, respectively. The anti-emetic efficacy of granisetron and dexamethasone was investigated in the cisplatin 5 mg/kg, i.v.-induced emesis model. In these experiments, cisplatin induced 47.0+/-14.0 and 20.0+/-9.0 retches+vomits on days 1 and 2, respectively, following a latency of 2.4+/-0.4 h. Granisetron (1 mg/kg, i.m.) administered three times per day reduced significantly the retching+vomiting response induced by cisplatin on days 1 and 2 by 100.0% (P<0.05) and 75.0% (P<0.05), respectively; dexamethasone (0.01-1 mg/kg, i.m.) administered three times per day reduced significantly the retching+vomiting response by 68.8-100.0% (P<0.05) and 33.3-100.0% (P<0.05) on days 1 and 2, respectively. The emetic action of cisplatin 7.5 mg/kg, i.v. was also investigated. This dose of cisplatin-induced emesis following a latency of 1.2+/-0.2 h and comprised 119.0+/-20.8 retches+vomits over a 24-h period. Granisetron and dexamethasone antagonized the emesis occurring in the first 3-h period (P<0.05) but were less effective to antagonize the subsequent emetic response (P0.05). The pharmacological sensitivity of low dose cisplatin-induced emesis in the cat is variable but unique and not representative of the clinical situation.

Effects of psychotropic drugs on cell proliferation and differentiation

Some of the psychotropic agents widely used for the amelioration of anxiety, depression, and psychosis also show an effect at the cellular proliferation level. Surprisingly little research, however, has been directed to the antitumoral potential of these drugs, alone or in combination with established cancer treatments. Our review of the literature to date has yielded some promising early findings. Ligands active at the benzodiazepine (BZ) receptors have been studied the most extensively and were found to have differential, concentration-dependent effects on the growth and proliferation of both normal and cancer cells. Of the phenothiazines tested, chlorpromazine (CPZ) and perphenazine (PPZ) had the most potent cytotoxic action on fibroblasts and glioma cells. Antiproliferative effects also were noted by these and other agents in leukemic and breast cancer cell lines. Additional psychotropic drugs studied include the atypical antipsychotics, antidepressants, and mood stabilizers, especially lithium. Most of the reported activities were observed in in vitro studies and were achieved at high pharmacological concentrations. Further in vivo studies in well-designed animal models are warranted to determine whether these well-tolerated, relatively inexpensive, and widely available drugs or their derivatives may be added in the future to the armamentarium of cancer pharmacotherapy.

Antiemetic efficacy of granisetron: a randomized crossover study in patients receiving cisplatin-containing intraarterial chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin (CDDP) is one of the most active chemotherapeutic agents but is among the most emetogenic drugs. The emetic side-effects of CDDP-containing intraarterial chemotherapy have not been evaluated in a prospective randomized trial and the efficacy of serotonin antagonists in preventing the emesis associated with this method of CDDP administration has not been assessed.

METHODS

CDDP 50 mg/m2 and methotrexate 30 mg/m2 were administered every 3 weeks through intraarterial catheters placed in the bilateral internal iliac arteries. Patients were classified into two groups: granisetron treatment group (group G) and no treatment group (group NG) with the first course of chemotherapy, crossing over with the second course. The patients in group G received granisetron 40 micrograms/kg by intravenous infusion.

RESULTS

Although intraarterial CDDP administration produced less emesis than intravenous CDDP administration, at the same concentration, gastrointestinal toxicity is still the most unpleasant side-effect for patients. Granisetron administration significantly reduced nausea and vomiting during the acute emetic phase (an evaluation of treatment as very effective and effective was made in 89% in group G and 33% in group NG (P < 0.001). Complete control of emesis was achieved in 68 and 18% of patients in groups G and NG, respectively (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

A single prophylactic infusion of granisetron was effective in preventing the nausea and vomiting associated with intraarterial CDDP-containing therapy.

Randomized phase II study of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist CJ-11,974 in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of the neurokinin type 1 receptor antagonist CJ-11,974 for the control of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, phase II design with a group sequential stopping rule was used in this study. Sixty-one patients with cancer who were receiving cisplatin at a dose of at least 100 mg/m2 for the first time were enrolled. All patients received granisetron 10 microg/kg and dexamethasone 20 mg intravenously 30 minutes before they were given cisplatin. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 received CJ-11,974 100 mg, and group 2 received placebo orally 30 minutes before and 12 hours after cisplatin and then twice daily on days 2 through 5 after cisplatin. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who developed delayed emesis (emesis on the second to fifth days after cisplatin).

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled in group 1, and 31 patients were enrolled in group 2. Fifty-eight patients were assessable for efficacy. Complete control of emesis (expressed as the percentage of patients who had no emesis) was as follows: day 1, 85.7% (group 1) and 66.7% (group 2) (P = .090); days 2 through 5, 67.8% (group 1) and 36.6% (group 2) (P = .0425, adjusted); days 1 through 5, 64.3% (group 1) and 30% (group 2) (P = .009). Patients in group 1 experienced significantly less nausea than patients in group 2 on day 1 (P = .024). Treatment was well tolerated in both groups.

CONCLUSION

We conclude from this exploratory phase II trial that CJ-11,974 is superior to placebo in controlling cisplatin-induced delayed emesis and may provide additive benefit in acute emesis and nausea control when combined with a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone. Additional larger trials are indicated to confirm the clinical value of CJ-11,974.

5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. A comparison of their pharmacology and clinical efficacy

In the mid-1980s it was discovered that serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) was at least partially responsible for producing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. It was therefore realised that serotonin receptor blockade with serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists could inhibit chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. 5-HT3 antagonists have different chemical structures and receptor binding affinity. Granisetron, dolasetron and its major metabolite are pure 5-HT3 antagonists, while ondansetron and tropisetron are weak antagonists at the 5-HT4 receptor. Ondansetron has also been demonstrated to bind at other serotonin receptors and to the opioid mu receptor. The half-lives of granisetron, tropisetron and the active metabolite of dolasetron are 2 to 3 times longer than that of ondansetron. These observations initially suggested that more frequent ondansetron administration would be required; however, it has now been shown that receptor blockade does not correlate with elimination half-life and all 5-HT3 antagonists can be effectively administered once daily. Clinical trials have been conducted that directly compare the 5-HT3 antagonists. To compare these studies, it is necessary to assess trial design, including known risk factors for the development of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and response criteria. Stratification for risk factors, use of strict efficacy criteria and randomisation to a blinded trial using an appropriate comparative regimen are essential for a well designed antiemetic trial. Comparative clinical trials using various doses, routes and regimens of administration have been conducted with 5-HT3 antagonists. Despite some trial design shortcomings, most of the studies show equal efficacy between the agents, especially in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and mild, infrequently occurring adverse effects. The addition of steroids also appears to improve outcome. However, since many doses and regimens of ondansetron were used, further study is needed to determine the optimal regimen. The efficacy of 5-HT3 antagonists in controlling delayed nausea and vomiting from chemotherapy is less well studied. Further, there is no good scientific rationale for the use of 5-HT3 antagonists in controlling delayed nausea and vomiting since serotonin has not been shown to be released during the delayed phase. In fact, most studies show no benefit or modest benefit of 5-HT3 antagonists over placebo. Because the 5-HT3 antagonists perform similarly in the clinical setting, pharmacological differences do not seem to translate into therapeutic differences. There is also no appreciable difference in the incidence or severity of adverse effects among the 5-HT3 antagonists. Determination of clinical use may then be driven by cost.

Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) excretion during multiple-day high-dose chemotherapy

Highly emetogenic drugs such as cisplatin induce an increase in the urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) level, the main metabolite of serotonin (5-HT), within the first 24 h following a single infusion, thus providing a possible cause for acute emesis and an explanation for the action of 5-HT3 antagonists. No further excretion peaks have been observed, suggesting that additional or serotonin-independent mechanisms cause delayed emesis. Our aim was to study the mechanisms behind emesis seen during a highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimen given as a continuous infusion over several days. Seven women treated with a 4-day high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) regimen for breast cancer entered the study. Pooled urine samples were collected prior to and during chemotherapy for determining 5-HIAA excretion. An excretion peak in the urinary 5-HIAA level was observed within the first 24 h with no further peaks thereafter. Thus, the mechanisms behind the emesis experienced during this highly emetogenic multiple-day chemotherapy regimen from days 2-3 onwards would appear to be at least partially serotonin independent and would not be expected to be completely relieved by 5-HT3 antagonists alone.

Effects of a 5-HT1A receptor agonist on acute and delayed cyclophosphamide-induced vomiting

LY228729 [(-)-4(dipropylamino)-1,3,4,5-tetrahydrobenz-[c,d]indole-6-carboxa mide]], an agonist at the 5-HT1A subtype of 5-HT receptor, was studied as an antiemetic in pigeons dosed with a highly emetic oncolytic agent, cyclophosphamide. An intramuscular injection of 0.32 mg/kg of LY228729 administered 15 min prior to the intravenous injection of 200 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide totally prevented the acute emetic response induced by cyclophosphamide. When used as a rescue therapy in a separate group of pigeons, LY228729 (0.32 mg/kg, i.m.) prevented further emetic episodes when it was administered after vomiting had already been induced by cyclophosphamide. Injections of LY228729 given at intervals over the next 2 d also attenuated the delayed emetic response induced by cyclophosphamide. LY228729 appears to be a broad spectrum antiemetic agent that is effective against the anticipatory, the acute and the delayed stages of emesis induced by oncolytic agents.

Prolonged nausea and vomiting after high dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation in the treatment of high risk breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Nausea and vomiting immediately after chemotherapy is a well recognized complication of cancer drug treatment; it is usually short-lived and controllable by modem antiemetics. The authors report a high incidence of prolonged nausea and vomiting after high dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation (PSCT) in the treatment of high risk breast carcinoma patients.

METHODS

Patients with high risk breast carcinoma were conditioned with high dose carmustine, cisplatin, and cyclophosphamide followed by autologous PSCT. In Part I of the study, patients who received PSCT at UCLA Medical Center were identified if they were either readmitted with dehydration secondary to nausea and vomiting or referred to a gastroenterology specialist for the treatment of intractable nausea and vomiting. In Part II of the study, the authors examined a series of 38 women treated at UCLA Medical Center in 1993 for high risk breast carcinoma to determine the incidence of prolonged postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting (PPNV) after PSCT. These women were followed at 2-week intervals with a quality of life evaluation that included questions about nausea and vomiting.

RESULTS

In Part I of the study, the authors identified 9 women with more than 1 month of significant nausea and vomiting after PSCT without evidence of obstruction or mucositis. Hospitalization was frequently required for hydration. Gastroparesis was found in all four patients who underwent gastric emptying studies. The nausea and vomiting responded to the promotility drug cisapride and high dose corticosteroids. In Part II of the study, the authors found that PPNV was frequent; 24% of patients had significant nausea and 18% had significant vomiting 6 weeks after PSCT, despite treatment with standard antiemetics.

CONCLUSIONS

PPNV is a frequent complication of high dose chemotherapy with the aforementioned regimen. It may be due to gastroparesis and represents a form of gastrointestinal toxicity to chemotherapy not previously reported.

Phase II study of high-dose dexamethasone-based association in acute and delayed high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis--JCOG study 9413

Thirty-three patients with lung cancer receiving 80 mg m(-2) cisplatin were treated with high-dose dexamethasone (32 mg m(-2) on days 1-3, 16 mg m(-2) on day 4 and 8 mg m(-2) on day 5) combined with granisetron on day 1 and metoclopramide on days 2-5. Twenty-eight (85%) patients had no nausea or vomiting on day 1, and 16 (48%) achieved total control on days 1-5 with acceptable toxicity. High-dose dexamethasone for cisplatin-induced delayed emesis should be further evaluated in a phase III trial.

Methodology of trials with antiemetics

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting can today be controlled with the "new" antiemetics or with their various combinations in a high percentage of patients. Despite this, for some subgroups of patients, certain chemotherapy regimens and some aspects of the phenomenon (delayed presentation), emesis remains a critical problem. Hence, there is the necessity for a continuous effort in the search for new drugs or better treatment modalities and the absolute requisite that these efforts be carried out according to a sound and verified trial methodology. Nausea and vomiting induced by antineoplastic agents are extremely variable phenomena, depending not only on the characteristics of chemotherapy regimens and of the patient population, but also on a subjective feeling generated by the impact of the care system on the patient's individual situation. Therefore, precisely because of this high variability, large comparative trials should be carried out to ensure that the sample is sufficiently representative for the most efficacious antiemetic regimen to be detected. In this field, some of the main problems arising in all clinical trials have their own specificity, particularly the study design, whether completely randomized or cross-over, the follow-up and the importance of prognostic factors. Among these, age, gender and previous chemotherapy with experience of nausea and vomiting have been confirmed as important. In addition, some topics must clearly be highlighted: the definition of the response variables and the assessment of variability of the results obtained with the same antiemetic regimen from one cycle of chemotherapy to the next (i.e. persistence). The greater attention devoted today to delayed emesis raises some methodological questions: this paper suggests some possible solutions for a better evaluation of this phenomenon.