Serum IgE and lung function in workers exposed to phthalic anhydride

Phthalic anhydride: Illustrating a conundrum in chemical allergy

Although a substantial number of chemicals has the ability to bind covalently to proteins and thereby, given sufficient exposure, induce a state of sensitization, only a small minority appear to be able to cause allergic hypersensitivity of the respiratory tract; the great majority being exclusively skin sensitizers. The key mechanistic drivers for the differentiation between skin and respiratory sensitization are already well characterized at the cellular/cytokine level. However, at both the chemical level and in terms of predictive toxicology, matters are much less clear. In the present article, phthalic anhydride is used as an exemplar, since it displays a particularly differentiated profile as a chemical allergen. Whereas most respiratory sensitizers are known also to give rise to delayed skin reactions, evidence for phthalic anhydride suggests that it only causes immediate type allergy. Chemically, phthalic anhydride can be presumed to react similar to other respiratory sensitizing anhydrides; in predictive tests for skin sensitization, phthalic anhydride is clearly positive, a property it has in common with all other chemical respiratory allergens. Thus, in the context of interpreting predictive toxicology tests for skin sensitization, the inference is that negative results demonstrate an absence of both skin- and respiratory-sensitizing capacity.

Occupational airway sensitizers: an overview on the respective literature

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, there is rigorous scientific activity concerning the further development of work safety regulations involving airway-sensitizing substances. Technical directives on hazardous substances are enforced in several countries and are being continuously updated. The European Union has established a code for several occupational substances, now labeled R 42 ("may cause sensitization by inhalation").

METHODS

We present an overview of the literature dealing with allergic occupational asthma. The literature was selected according to criteria of study design and diagnostic test methods. Approximately 300 publications were reviewed including both epidemiological studies and individual case reports.

RESULTS

Airway sensitizers are systematically arranged and separately listed according to chemicals and their origin from animals, plants, and microorganisms. The clinical data as well as threshold limit values (TLV) and R 42 labeling of 250 airway-sensitizing substances are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common sensitizing substances causing occupational asthma were dust of cereal flours, enzymes, natural rubber latex, laboratory animals as well as low molecular substances such as isocyanates and acid anhydrides.

Total serum IgE in trimellitic anhydride-induced asthma

The objective of this study was to determine whether total serum IgE levels are elevated in workers with trimellitic anhydride-induced asthma as compared with anhydride-exposed workers without an occupational immunologic syndrome. Sera from 12 highly exposed workers with trimellitic anhydride-induced asthma, and from 31 similarly exposed workers without occupational immunologic disease, were assayed for total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels by Total IgE II FAST analysis. The mean total IgE levels were 176.74 ng/mL and 34.55 ng/mL respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant, but considerable overlap of IgE levels between groups was seen. In conclusion, although mean total IgE levels are significantly different between TMA-exposed workers with or without occupational asthma, the significant amount of overlap and poor sensitivity of the test preclude the use of this assay in the individual evaluation of these workers.

A clinical and immunological study on 92 workers occupationally exposed to anhydrides

This study aimed at investigating sensitizing and hazardous effects of a new acid anhydride, pyromellitic dianhydride (PMDA), in addition to those of phthalic anhydride, maleic anhydride and trimellitic anhydride, in a group of 92 exposed workers in two German chemical plants. Of the 92 workers, 56 reported work-related complaints with a predominance of phlegm and dyspnoea in those exposed to anhydride dust for less than 1 year. Haemorrhagic rhinitis occurred only after a prolonged exposure of more than 15 years. Specific IgE antibodies to anhydride-HSA conjugates could be detected in 15 exposed subjects, 12 of whom had work-related symptoms. The IgE-positive group had significantly more impaired lung function parameters than the IgE-negative group. The proportion of IgE-positive subjects was highest in the groups with dyspnoea (5/18), cough (6/24) and rhinitis (11/44) whereas only 1 of 11 workers with haemorrhagic rhinitis had such antibodies. A follow-up study of 23 affected workers was performed after 10 months to assess clinical symptoms, lung function and IgE antibody levels. This follow-up study showed the absence of obstructive ventilation patterns in three out of six subjects in addition to cessation of symptoms in most initially affected workers who were no longer exposed. On the other hand, 14 workers under continuous exposure had comparable pathological findings on re-examination. Our results confirm that anhydrides including the lesser known PMDA, behave as respiratory irritants and as immediate-type sensitizers. They predominantly induced reversible symptoms in workers whose exposure stopped after a working period of about 0.7 years. Abnormal lung function parameters normalized in nearly 50% of these subjects.