The "turn-over" technique for selective cerebral angiography

Optimal guiding catheter position during advancement of the guiding catheter into the carotid artery from the aortic arch via transfemoral approach

BACKGROUND

Guiding catheter (GC) advancement into the target carotid artery is a crucial step in neuroendovascular therapy. In difficult anatomies, alternative methods have been reported to overcome difficult carotid access for swift GC advancement. However, studies focusing on the positional relationship between the GC and inner catheter (IC) at the aortic arch are lacking.

METHODS

We evaluated the impact of the positional relationship between the GC and IC on whether the GC position affects catheter support or system straightening. We retrospectively reviewed 89 patients who underwent neuroendovascular therapy. We assessed the time to carotid access across difficult arch anatomies. The GC position was divided into Position 1, descending aorta level; Position 2, aortic arch level; and Position 3, origin of the left common carotid artery or innominate artery. We also evaluated the GC support and straightening effects in an in vitro vascular model study.

RESULTS

The coaxial catheter flexion angle at the aortic arch was significantly larger when the GC was set to Position 3 (p < 0.0001). A significantly shorter time to carotid access was observed with Positions 2 and 3 than with Position 1 in the difficult arch anatomy group. In the in vitro vascular model evaluation, the catheter support effect significantly increased as the GC position became closer to the IC tip (p < 0.0001) and straightening effect significantly increased as the GC moved to Position 2 from Position 1 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

During GC advancement, the GC positional relationship changed the support of the coaxial system with system straightening. The optimal GC position, Position 3, facilitated swift GC advancement.

Efficacy of the Insertion-support Guiding Catheter in Approaching Intracranial or Craniocervical Lesions in Patients with the Difficulty of Extracranial Trans-arterial Access

Objective

We aimed to investigate the efficacy of the insertion-support guiding catheter (ISGC) for approaching target lesions during endovascular therapy in patients with severe atherosclerotic or tortuous arteries.

Case Presentations

The ISGC is an 8 Fr, JB2 shape, stiff-type, short guiding catheter. We used ISGC for 52 patients between April 2007 and March 2018, microcatheters or therapeutic devices were delivered to target lesions via ISGC in 46 (88.4%) of the 52 patients, and none of them developed associated complications. Herein, we present three representative cases.

Conclusions

An ISGC is useful for vascular intervention in patients with atherosclerotic or tortuous arteries.

Parent and Child Balloon Technique for Navigating Guide Catheters During Neurointerventions

BACKGROUND

The stabilization of a guide catheter is an important factor for performing successful neurointerventional procedures. We present our technique for navigating guide catheters using parent and child balloons.

METHODS

In 9 patients with severe atherosclerosis or anatomic variations such as a bovine arch, 8-9-F balloon-mounted guide catheters were navigated using balloon-attached guidewires. Both balloons were used complementarily for flow navigation and vessel fixation at the appropriate positions and times.

RESULTS

In all cases, the balloon guide catheter could be inserted up to the required positions, and the procedures were completed without any complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The parent and child balloon technique is useful for inserting guide catheters in hostile vascular anatomies.

The transradial approach for selective carotid and vertebral angiography

PURPOSE

The transradial approach is not so popular in cerebral angiography. The purpose of this study was therefore to present our experience of success rate and safety of this method.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From December 1998 to June 2001, 526 carotid and vertebral angiographies with DSA were performed via the radial artery. A 1.4-mm catheter was used through a 1.4-mm introducer sheath. We evaluated the procedure as successful if sufficient images for diagnosis were obtained of the bilateral carotid arteries and unilateral vertebral artery. Each patient was reassessed for any complications, occurring until the next morning. The length of time needed for an examination was measured in the last 10 cases.

RESULTS

In all but 5 cases, the procedures were evaluated as successful (99.0%). Unsuccessful cases manifested severe pain at the radial puncture, angiospasm at the radial artery, loop formation at the radial artery, occlusion at the subclavian artery, and an aberrant right subclavian artery. No severe complications including neurological ones were encountered. Minor complications were noted in 17 cases (3.2%): 4 cases of thrombus at the ulnar artery, 1 angiospasm at the radial artery, and 12 cases of small hematoma at the puncture site. The radial approach took 14 min less in the common carotid study and 3 min 30 s less in the internal carotid study than by the femoral approach.

CONCLUSION

The transradial approach enabled selective studies for carotid and vertebral angiography with a high success rate and safety with few complications.