Pharmacokinetics of verapamil in patients with hypertension

Verapamil and aspirin modulate platelet-mediated vasomotion in arterial segments with intact or disrupted endothelium

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to examine the effects of verapamil and aspirin, which decrease thromboxane A2 and serotonin release, on the modulation of vascular tone by platelets.

BACKGROUND

Aggregating platelets cause constriction of de-endothelialized arterial segments through thromboxane A2 and serotonin release. These cells cause relaxation of arterial segments with intact endothelium through release of the endothelium-derived relaxing factor.

METHODS

Healthy subjects were given either no drug, verapamil or aspirin for > or = 5 days before their platelets were obtained. The effects of platelets obtained from subjects before and after treatment with aspirin or verapamil on the tone of rat aortic rings were determined.

RESULTS

As expected, control platelets (before verapamil or aspirin treatment) induced concentration-dependent relaxation of rat aortic rings with intact endothelium and a concentration-dependent contraction of de-endothelialized rings. Verapamil treatment enhanced (p < 0.02) the platelet-mediated relaxation in rings with intact endothelium and abolished platelet-mediated constriction (p < 0.01) in the de-endothelialized rings. Aspirin treatment also abolished (p < 0.05) platelet-mediated constriction of the de-endothelialized rings. The de-endothelialized rings contracted normally in response to the synthetic thromboxane A2 analogue U46,619, as well as to serotonin, indicating that the vascular smooth muscle response to thromboxane A2 and serotonin was intact.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence for the modulation of platelet-mediated vasoconstriction of de-endothelialized arterial segments by prior treatment of subjects with verapamil or aspirin. In clinical syndromes characterized by endothelial dysfunction or disruption, treatment with verapamil or aspirin may modify platelet-vessel wall interactions.

Verapamil induces increased bone volume and osteopenia in female rats but has the opposite effect in male rats

Verapamil inhibits the intestinal absorption of calcium (Ca) and increases serum parathyroid hormone in rats. The effects of verapamil on bone tissue after long-term treatment is, however, not well described. Adult female and male Sprague-Dawley rats received verapamil in their drinking water at a dosage of 0.075 mg/ml (low dose) or 0.75 mg/ml (high dose) for 12 weeks; control rats received only drinking water. All rats were fed a diet containing 0.1% Ca and 0.5% P. In female rats, the amount of bone ash per volume was significantly reduced from 0.742 g/ml in controls to 0.713 g/ml after low-dose treatment of verapamil, and to 0.667 g/ml following high-dose treatment (P less than 0.01). The tibial length was increased from 39.7 mm in controls to 40.3 mm or to 40.7 mm after low or high doses (P less than 0.01). The tibial volume increased from 0.385 ml in controls to 0.397 ml after low doses and to 0.429 ml after high doses (P less than 0.01). In contrast, in male rats the amount of bone ash per volume was significantly increased from 0.578 g/ml in controls to 0.580 g/ml after low doses and to 0.620 g/ml after high doses of verapamil (P less than 0.01). The tibial bone volume in males as decreased from 0.633 ml in controls to 0.641 ml after low doses and to 0.583 ml after high doses (P less than 0.05). The tibial length in the males was not changed by verapamil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Verapamil increases serum ionized calcium and serum phosphate in patients with post-surgical hypoparathyroidism

The calcium homeostasis in eight patients with postoperative hypoparathyroidism was examined before and after 2 weeks of administration of verapamil in an oral dose of 80 mg three times daily. Serum ionized calcium increased during verapamil treatment (from mean +/- SD of 1.10 +/- 0.06 to 1.24 +/- 0.38 mmol l-1; P less than 0.05), as well as total serum calcium corrected for protein (from 2.11 +/- 0.13 to 2.18 +/- 0.13 mmol l-1; P less than 0.05). During treatment with verapamil there was an increase in serum phosphate (from 1.08 +/- 0.15 to 1.19 +/- 0.20 mmol l-1 P less than or equal to 0.05) and in the urinary excretion of phosphate (P/creatinine ratio from 1.22 +/- 0.69 to 1.83 +/- 0.97; P less than or equal to 0.05). The serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin-D3 and serum parathyroid hormone were below the detection limits both before and after verapamil treatment. There were no significant changes either of the intestinal absorption of calcium or of the urinary calcium excretion. Serum osteocalcin was insignificantly reduced after treatment (1.60 +/- 0.70 before treatment and 1.25 +/- 0.71 micrograms l-1 after treatment). Thus in patients with post-surgical hypoparathyroidism verapamil has effects on calcium and phosphorous homeostasis. Since calcium absorption was not influenced by verapamil, it is suggested that verapamil affects bone mineral metabolism.

Evaluation of potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between verapamil and propranolol in normal subjects

1. Potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between verapamil and propranolol were evaluated in two double-blind, randomised, balanced, crossover studies employing the same six healthy males. 2. The first study examined the effect of repeated propranolol administration on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of verapamil after single oral and intravenous doses. The second explored the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of verapamil and propranolol alone and in combination after single and repeated oral doses. 3. The magnitude of the prolongation of PR interval induced by oral and intravenous verapamil was not affected by pre-treatment with propranolol. When verapamil and propranolol were co-administered as single doses, effects on PR interval were additive but, following repeated doses, a trend towards greater than additive prolongation was seen. The arithmetic sum of the effects of the two drugs was 23% (95% C.I. 8-38%) but the measured increase after the combination was 40% (95% C.I. 26-54%). 4. The extent of reduction in heart rate and blood pressure at rest and after exercise following repeated doses of propranolol was not influenced by single oral or intravenous doses of verapamil. The heart rate and blood pressure responses to single and repeated oral doses of verapamil and propranolol in combination were significantly greater than those after either drug alone and approximated to the arithmetic sum of the individual responses. 5. Although repeated administration of propranolol reduced hepatic blood flow as assessed by indocyanine green clearance, there was no evidence of an interaction between the drugs at this level. 6. The pharmacokinetics of verapamil and norverapamil were not significantly affected by prior propranolol. After single doses of verapamil and propranolol in combination, the maximum plasma concentration of propranolol was increased and the oral clearance of verapamil reduced. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed after repeated doses. 7. These findings provide little evidence of a pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic interaction between verapamil and propranolol in normal subjects. Most of the haemodynamic responses to these drugs in combination can be explained by additive drug effects but an interaction affecting AV conduction after repeated doses cannot be excluded. The minor pharmacokinetic interaction between the drugs is unlikely to be relevant to the pharmacodynamic changes.

Verapamil increases serum alkaline phosphatase in hypertensive patients

In rats, verapamil decreases intestinal absorption of calcium, increases serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), and induces osteopenia. In this prospective study, verapamil 80-120 mg three times daily was given for 2 months to 20 patients with hypertension, and the effects on calcium homeostasis were recorded. This dose of verapamil significantly reduced supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure (+/- SD) from 158/100 +/- 9/8 mmHg to 146/89 +/- 14/8 mmHg (P = 0.001). Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased significantly from 2.77 +/- 1.06 mu kat l-1 to 3.19 +/- 1.22 mu kat l-1 (P = 0.004), and isoenzymes of ALP of skeletal origin appeared after verapamil treatment. The excretion of sodium in the urine increased (Na/creatinine ratio 8.95 +/- 6.01 before and 13.16 +/- 8.26 after verapamil; P = 0.04), while the excretion of calcium, phosphate and potassium was not changed. PTH was slightly increased at the end of verapamil treatment (1.09 +/- 0.54 vs. 0.98 +/- 0.74 microgram l-1; P = 0.07), and s-1,25(OH)2D3 was also somewhat increased (22.3 +/- 14.4 vs. 17.6 +/- 4.9 ng l-1; P = 0.26). Serum Ca was not affected by verapamil (before verapamil 2.43 +/- 0.11 mmol l-1, after verapamil 2.40 +/- 0.12 mmol l-1; P = 0.28). The increase in serum ALP demonstrates that verapamil affects bone cell metabolism in man. This effect could be secondary to the enhancement of PTH secretion.

Requirements for drug monitoring of verapamil: experience from an unselected group of patients with cardiovascular disease

Serum verapamil and metabolite concentrations were determined by HPLC in 29 patients in routine treatment with verapamil, and 23 were in steady state. Dosage levels and corresponding mean trough levels (+/- S.D.) were as follows: 120 mg daily: 79.1 (+/- 77) nmol/l, 240 mg daily: 173.3 (+/- 200.1) nmol/l, 360 mg daily: 204 (+/- 110.2) nmol/l and 480 mg daily: 361.0 (+/- 231.4) nmol/l. The variation coefficients were 97.3, 115.4, 54.0, and 62.1, respectively, thus showing considerable interpatient variation. Repeated determination of trough levels showed, in contrast, only small intrapatient variation (variation coefficient 35.8, 1.9, and 7.4, at the dosage levels 120, 240 and 340 mg per day). No significant correlation was found between serum verapamil levels age, sex, or weight. No significant effect of digoxin on the concentration of serum verapamil was found. No relation was observed between serum verapamil concentrations and desired effect or side-effects. Two patients showed no measurable serum verapamil, but one of these had detectable levels of metabolites. Such patients may represent subgroups of fast metabolizers or non-absorbers. Measurements of the metabolites nor-verapamil, D 620 and D 617 indicated saturation of the first-pass metabolism. In conclusion, therapeutic drug monitoring is not indicated during routine verapamil treatment, whereas single measurements of verapamil may be warranted in patients not responding to treatment in order to identify fast metabolizers or non-absorbers.

Differences in oral verapamil absorption as a function of time of day

As part of a multiple dose bioavailability study, 80-mg verapamil hydrochloride tablets were administered to healthy subjects every 8 hours for 15 doses. Statistically significant successive decreases in verapamil maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values were observed corresponding to dosing at 8 AM, 4 PM, and 12 AM. Mean Cmax and AUC values from the 12 AM dose were decreased 36% and 30%, respectively, relative to those from the 8 AM dose. Similar effects on norverapamil pharmacokinetics were observed. Decreased Cmax and AUC values show that verapamil absorption is influenced by the time of day when doses are administered. Pharmacokinetic simulation results suggest that the rate of absorption is reduced approximately by one half and two thirds during the 4 PM and 12 AM dosing intervals, respectively, relative to the 8 AM dosing interval. The reductions in verapamil absorption as a function of time of administration observed in this study may in part explain previous reports of reduced antihypertensive effect during evening and night hours as compared to daytime hours.

Verapamil. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension

Although verapamil is a well-established treatment for angina, cardiac arrhythmias and cardiomyopathies, this review reflects current interest in calcium antagonists as anti-hypertensive agents by focusing on the role of verapamil in hypertension. Verapamil is a phenylalkylamine derivative which antagonises calcium influx through the slow channels of vascular smooth muscle and cardiac cell membranes. By reducing intracellular free calcium concentrations, verapamil causes coronary and peripheral vasodilation and depresses myocardial contractility and electrical activity in the atrioventricular and sinoatrial nodes. Verapamil is well suited for the management of essential hypertension since it produces generalised systemic vasodilation resulting in a marked reduction in systemic vascular resistance and, consequently, blood pressure. Evidence from clinical studies supports the role of oral verapamil as an effective and well-tolerated first-line treatment for the management of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Clinical studies have shown that verapamil is more effective the higher the pretreatment blood pressure and some authors have found a more pronounced antihypertensive effect in older patients or in patients with low plasma renin activity. Sustained release verapamil formulations are available for oral administration which, as a single daily dose, are as effective in lowering blood pressure over 24 hours as equivalent doses of conventional verapamil formulations given 3 times daily. As a first-line antihypertensive agent, oral verapamil is equivalent to several other calcium antagonists, beta-blockers, diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and other vasodilators, and is not associated with many of the common adverse effects of these treatments. Verapamil may be preferred as an alternative first-line antihypertensive treatment to diuretics in elderly patients because it has similar efficacy in these patients without causing the adverse effects commonly linked with diuretic treatment. Furthermore, because verapamil does not cause bronchoconstriction, it may be used in preference to beta-blockers in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive airway disease. Reflex tachycardia, orthostatic hypotension or development of tolerance is not evident following verapamil administration. As a second- or third-line treatment for patients refractory to established antihypertensive regimens, verapamil produces marked blood pressure reductions when combined with diuretics and/or ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers and vasodilators such as prazosin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Verapamil disposition and cardiovascular effects in elderly patients after single intravenous and oral doses

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of verapamil were studied in 11 elderly subjects (age = 79.67 +/- 4.74 years) and in 11 middle-aged subjects (age = 45 +/- 11.37 years) following intravenous (IV), single oral, and long-term oral administration. Plasma verapamil concentrations were determined using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Twenty-four hour dynamic Holter electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings were employed to study heart rate (HR) and P-R interval. No difference in plasma half-life, distribution volume, body clearance, and area under the curve (AUC) was observed between the two groups after IV and oral verapamil administration. Blood pressure (BP) and HR were significantly reduced after verapamil IV administration in the elderly group only (p less than 0.05, p less than 0.01, respectively). After single and long-term oral administration, variable HR and BP responses were observed in both groups. The P-R prolongation following both IV and single oral doses exhibited a delay with respect to the peak plasma concentration, inducing a definite hysteresis loop. The slope of P-R variations (using a linear pharmacodynamic model) was greater in the elderly both after IV and single oral verapamil administration, but statistical significance was obtained only after the single oral dose (p less than 0.05). In the elderly group, after long-term oral administration, there was a significant prolongation of the P-R interval (p less than 0.0001) with respect to the corresponding time point of the 24-hour predrug period. Such variations in pharmacodynamic parameters in the elderly did not, however, cause any clinical problem.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics of verapamil and norverapamil in patients with hypertension: a comparison of oral conventional and sustained release formulations

A double blind, double dummy, randomized cross-over pharmacokinetic study comparing verapamil 120 mg, conventional tablets administered twice daily and verapamil 240 mg sustained release tablets once daily was performed in 12 patients with essential hypertension. After frequent blood sampling, analyses of verapamil and norverapamil were made with high pressure liquid chromatography. The absorption rate of the sustained release formulation was significantly slower than for the conventional formulation. Also the mean residence time was significantly longer for the sustained release tablet. It can be concluded that verapamil sustained release tablets meet with the following requirements for these formulations: (1) a slower absorption with an acceptable bioavailability relative to conventional tablets (89%); (2) no initial high peak concentration; (3) little fluctuation in the plasma concentration compared to the conventional formulation; (4) no differences in the elimination half lives for the two formulations; (5) maintenance of a therapeutic plasma level for a longer period of time than for the conventional formulation; (6) no increase in unwanted side effects.

Calcium absorption and excretion in patients treated with verapamil

1. The effect of verapamil on the intestinal absorption of calcium was studied using a single isotope technique. Serum calcium and urinary excretion of calcium in the urine were followed in nine patients during treatment with verapamil for 2 months. 2. A dose of 80-120 mg (three times daily) resulted in a significant reduction of systolic and diastolic blood pressure. 3. There was no change in the intestinal calcium absorption (alpha) expressed as the fraction of given activity absorbed per hour (alpha = 0.82 +/- 0.19 vs alpha = 0.83 +/- 0.25; +/- s.d., NS) or of the excretion of calcium in urine (Ca/creatinine ratio 0.35 +/- 0.20 vs 0.31 +/- 0.33; NS). 4. Serum calcium was not significantly different before and during treatment (2.43 mmol l-1 +/- 0.10 vs 2.47 mmol l-1 +/- 0.14; NS). 5. This study demonstrates that verapamil, at doses recommended for clinical use, does not seem to affect the intestinal absorption of calcium, the serum calcium concentration or the excretion of calcium in urine.