Effects of josamycin on carbamazepine kinetics

Factors contributing to carbamazepine-macrolide interactions

Certain macrolides (e.g. clarithromycin or erythromycin) are known to interact with the carbamazepine antiepileptic drug. Carbamazepine-macrolide interaction leads to an increase in the level of carbamazepine in the blood, so inducing carbamazepine toxicity. The aim of this paper is to compare the extent of the interaction for each macrolide and to study the effects of age, gender, weight, the carbamazepine and macrolide dosages and the use of other antiepileptic drugs on the extent of the carbamazepine-macrolide interaction. Case reports published in the literature were reviewed and analysed to this end. The results show that three macrolides (erythromycin, troleandomycin and, to a lesser extent, clarithromycin) may induce carbamazepine toxicity in clinical practice. Furthermore, it was observed that high dosages of carbamazepine or macrolides and the use of concurrent anticonvulsivant drugs in the case of patients below 60 years of age are associated with the highest carbamazepine levels in carbamazepine-macrolide interactions. This study should help physicians choose a macrolide that does not interact with carbamazepine and evaluate the risk of an interaction between carbamazepine and macrolides.

The emerging role of cytochrome P450 3A in psychopharmacology

Recent advances in molecular pharmacology have allowed the characterization of the specific isoforms that mediate the metabolism of various medications. This information can be integrated with older clinical observations to begin to develop specific mechanistic and predictive models of psychotropic drug interactions. The polymorphic cytochrome P450 2D6 has gained much attention, because competition for this isoform is responsible for serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced increases in tricyclic antidepressant concentrations in plasma. However, the cytochrome P450 3A subfamily and the 3A3 and 3A4 isoforms (CYP3A3/4) in particular are becoming increasingly important in psychopharmacology as a result of their central involvement in the metabolism of a wide range of steroids and medications, including antidepressants, benzodiazepines, calcium channel blockers, and carbamazepine. The inhibition of CYP3A3/4 by medications such as certain newer antidepressants, calcium channel blockers, and antibiotics can increase the concentrations of CYP3A3/4 substrates, yielding toxicity. The induction of CYP3A3/4 by medications such as carbamazepine can decrease the concentrations of CYP3A3/4 substrates, yielding inefficiency. Thus, knowledge of the substrates, inhibitors, and inducers of CYP3A3/ and other cytochrome P450 isoforms may help clinicians to anticipate and avoid pharmacokinetic drug interactions and improve rational prescribing practices.

Macrolides versus azalides: a drug interaction update

OBJECTIVE

To describe the current drug interaction profiles for all approved and investigational macrolide and azalide antimicrobials, and to comment on the clinical impact of these interactions when appropriate.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE was searched to identify all pertinent studies, review articles, and case reports from 1975 to 1995. When appropriate information was not available in the literature, data were obtained from the product manufacturers.

STUDY SELECTION

All available data were reviewed to give an unbiased account of possible drug interactions.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data for some of the interactions were not available from the literature, but were available from abstracts or from company-supplied materials. Although the data were not always entirely explicative, the best attempt was made to deliver the pertinent information that clinical practitioners would need to formulate practice opinions. When more in-depth information was supplied in the form of a review or study report, a thorough explanation of pertinent methodology was supplied.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Since the introduction of erythromycin into clinical practice, there have been several clinically significant drug interactions identified throughout the literature associated with this drug. These interactions have been caused mostly by inhibition of the CYP3A subclass of hepatic enzymes, thereby decreasing the metabolism of any other agent given concurrently that is also cleared through this mechanism. With the development and marketing of several new macrolides, it was hoped that the drug interaction profile associated with this class would improve. This has been met with variable success. Although some of the extensions of the 14-membered ring macrolides have shown an incidence of interactions equal to that of erythromycin, others have shown improved profiles. In contrast, the 16-membered ring macrolides have demonstrated a much improved, though not absent, interaction profile. The most success in avoiding drug interactions through structure modification has been accomplished with the development of the azalide class, of which azithromycin is the first to be approved for marketing. This agent has to date produced none of the classic drug interactions that most macrolides have demonstrated in patient care.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of new 14- and 16-membered ring macrolides appears to have had a variable effect in modifying the incidence of drug interactions associated with this class. Azithromycin, a member of the new azalide class, has to date produced fewer clinically significant interactions than other azalides with any agent that is cleared through the CYP3A system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Macrolide antibacterials. Drug interactions of clinical significance

Macrolide antibiotics can interact adversely with commonly used drugs, usually by altering metabolism due to complex formation and inhibition of cytochrome P-450 IIIA4 (CYP3A4) in the liver and enterocytes. In addition, pharmacokinetic drug interactions with macrolides can result from their antibiotic effect on microorganisms of the enteric flora, and through enhanced gastric emptying due to a motilin-like effect. Macrolides may be classified into 3 different groups according to their affinity for CYP3A4, and thus their propensity to cause pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Troleandomycin, erythromycin and its prodrugs decrease drug metabolism and may produce drug interactions (group 1). Others, including clarithromycin, flurithromycin, midecamycin, midecamycin acetate (miocamycin; ponsinomycin), josamycin and roxithromycin (group 2) rarely cause interactions. Azithromycin, dirithromycin, rikamycin and spiramycin (group 3) do not inactivate CYP3A4 and do not engender these adverse effects. Drug interactions with carbamazepine, cyclosporin, terfenadine, astemizole and theophylline represent the most frequently encountered interactions with macrolide antibiotics. If the combination of a macrolide and one of these compounds cannot be avoided, serum concentrations of concurrently administered drugs should be monitored and patients observed for signs of toxicity. Rare interactions and those of dubious clinical importance are those with alfentanil and sufentanil, antacids and cimetidine, oral anticoagulants, bromocriptine, clozapine, oral contraceptive steroids, digoxin, disopyramide, ergot alkaloids, felodipine, glibenclamide (glyburide), levodopa/carbidopa, lovastatin, methylprednisolone, phenazone (antipyrine), phenytoin, rifabutin and rifampicin (rifampin), triazolam and midazolam, valproic acid (sodium valproate) and zidovudine.

Antiepileptic drugs. A review of clinically significant drug interactions

Approximately 20 to 30% of patients with active intractable epilepsy are commonly treated with polytherapy antiepileptic drug regimens, and these patients may experience complicated drug interactions. Furthermore, because of the long term nature of treatment, the possibility of drug interactions with drugs used for the treatment of concomitant disease is high. Classically, clinically significant drug interactions, both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic, have been considered to be detrimental to the patient, necessitating dosage adjustment. However, this need not always be the case. With the introduction of new drugs (e.g. vigabatrin and lamotrigine) with known mechanisms of action, the possibility exists that these can be used synergistically. The most commonly observed clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions can be attributed to interactions at the metabolic and serum protein binding levels. The best known examples relate to induction (e.g. phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine and primidone) or inhibition [e.g. valproic acid (sodium valproate)] of hepatic monoxygenase enzymes. The extent and direction of interactions between the different antiepileptic drugs are varied and unpredictable. Interactions in which the metabolism of phenobarbital, phenytoin or carbamazepine is inhibited are particularly important since these are commonly associated with toxicity. Some inhibitory drugs include macrolide antibiotics, chloramphenicol, cimetidine, isoniazid and numerous sulphonamides. A reduction in efficacy of antibiotic, cardiovascular, corticosteroid, oral anticoagulant and oral contraceptive drugs occurs during combination therapy with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs. Discontinuation of the enzyme inducer or inhibitor will influence the concentrations of the remaining drug(s) and may necessitate dosage readjustment.

Clarithromycin-carbamazepine interaction: a case report

We report a clinically relevant interaction between a new macrolide antibiotic, clarithromycin, and carbamazepine (CBZ). In a patient receiving CBZ monotherapy, 10-day antibiotic treatment increased CBZ concentration despite concomitant CBZ dose reduction and doubled the CBZ concentration/dose ratio. Concentration of the CBZ epoxide (CBZ-E) metabolite was reduced, suggesting that the interaction occurs at a metabolic level.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of macrolides

The macrolide antibiotics include natural members, prodrugs and semisynthetic derivatives. These drugs are indicated in a variety of infections and are often combined with other drug therapies, thus creating the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions. Macrolides can both inhibit drug metabolism in the liver by complex formation and inactivation of microsomal drug oxidising enzymes and also interfere with microorganisms of the enteric flora through their antibiotic effects. Over the past 20 years, a number of reports have incriminated macrolides as a potential source of clinically severe drug interactions. However, differences have been found between the various macrolides in this regard and not all macrolides are responsible for drug interactions. With the recent advent of many semisynthetic macrolide antibiotics it is now evident that they may be classified into 3 different groups in causing drug interactions. The first group (e.g. troleandomycin, erythromycins) are those prone to forming nitrosoalkanes and the consequent formation of inactive cytochrome P450-metabolite complexes. The second group (e.g. josamycin, flurithromycin, roxithromycin, clarithromycin, miocamycin and midecamycin) form complexes to a lesser extent and rarely produce drug interactions. The last group (e.g. spiramycin, rokitamycin, dirithromycin and azithromycin) do not inactivate cytochrome P450 and are unable to modify the pharmacokinetics of other compounds. It appears that 2 structural factors are important for a macrolide antibiotic to lead to the induction of cytochrome P450 and the formation in vivo or in vitro of an inhibitory cytochrome P450-iron-nitrosoalkane metabolite complex: the presence in the macrolide molecules of a non-hindered readily accessible N-dimethylamino group and the hydrophobic character of the drug. Troleandomycin ranks first as a potent inhibitor of microsomal liver enzymes, causing a significant decrease of the metabolism of methylprednisolone, theophylline, carbamazepine, phenazone (antipyrine) and triazolam. Troleandomycin can cause ergotism in patients receiving ergot alkaloids and cholestatic jaundice in those taking oral contraceptives. Erythromycin and its different prodrugs appear to be less potent inhibitors of drug metabolism. Case reports and controlled studies have, however, shown that erythromycins may interact with theophylline, carbamazepine, methylprednisolone, warfarin, cyclosporin, triazolam, midazolam, alfentanil, disopyramide and bromocriptine, decreasing drug clearance. The bioavailability of digoxin appears also to be increased by erythromycin in patients excreting high amounts of reduced digoxin metabolites, probably due to destruction of enteric flora responsible for the formation of these compounds. These incriminated macrolide antibiotics should not be administered concomitantly with other drugs known to be affected metabolically by them, or at the very least, combined administration should be carried out only with careful patient monitoring.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Clinically relevant anti-epileptic drug interactions

Anti-epileptic drugs frequently interact due to pharmacokinetic features (induction or inhibition of metabolism, production of active metabolites, low therapeutic indices) and the need for prolonged treatment with possible addition of other drugs to treat concomitant diseases. The most important pharmacokinetic interactions are those that inhibit phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbitone metabolism and thus increase their toxicity. Drugs inhibiting metabolism include antibiotic macrolides, chloramphenicol, isoniazide, some sulphonamides, propoxyphene, cimetidine, valproic acid and sulthiame. Anti-epileptic drugs can induce hepatic microsomal enzymes and, therefore, may increase metabolism of corticosteroids, oral contraceptives, oral anticoagulants, cardiovascular agents, antibiotics, chemotherapeutic agents, psychotropic drugs and non-opiate analgesics, thereby reducing their efficacy. Advantageous pharmacodynamic interactions include synergism of ethosuximide plus valproic acid and of carbamazepine plus valproic acid. A pharmacodynamic mechanism may be responsible for the reduced sensitivity of chronically treated epileptics to some neuromuscular blockers.