The electrical light response of theLimulus ventral nerve photoreceptor, a superposition of distinct components ? Observable by variation of the state of light adaptation

The Limulus ventral photoreceptor: light response and the role of calcium in a classic preparation

The ventral nerve photoreceptor of the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus has been used for many years to investigate basic mechanisms of invertebrate phototransduction. The activation of rhodopsin leads in visual cells of invertebrates to an enzyme cascade at the end of which ion channels in the plasma membrane are transiently opened. This allows an influx of cations resulting in a depolarization of the photoreceptor cell. The receptor current of the Limulus ventral photoreceptor consists of three components which differ in several aspects, such as the time course of activation, the time course of recovery from light adaptation, and the reversal potential. Each component is influenced in a different, characteristic way by various pharmacological manipulations. In addition, at least two types of single photon-evoked events (bumps) and three elementary channel conductances are observed in this photoreceptor cell. These findings suggest that the receptor current components are controlled by three different light-activated enzymatic pathways using three different ligands to increase membrane conductance. Probably one of these ligands is cyclic GMP, another one is activated via the IP3-cascade and calcium, the third one might be cyclic AMP. Calcium ions are very important for the excitation and adaptation of visual cells in invertebrates. The extracellular and intracellular calcium concentrations determine the functional state of the visual cell. A rise in the cytosolic calcium concentration appears to be an essential step in the excitatory transduction cascade. Cytosolic calcium is the major intracellular mediator of adaptation. If the cytosolic calcium level exceeds a certain threshold value after exposure to light it causes the desensitization of the visual cell. On the other hand, from a slight rise in cytosolic calcium facilitation results, i.e. increased sensitivity of the photoreceptor.

Cyclic nucleotides and inositol trisphosphate activate different components of the receptor current in Limulus ventral nerve photoreceptors

Receptor currents activated by short flashes were measured in ventral nerve photoreceptors of Limulus before and after injection of neomycin or phosphodiesterase (PDE). Neomycin inhibits the inositol cascade and PDE hydrolyses cyclic nucleotides. The effect of these substances was studied on the three current components, which were suggested to be activated by distinct transduction mechanisms. The second component of the current was selectively blocked by neomycin and the third component by PDE. The first component was inhibited by both substances. Thus, two transduction mechanisms for two current components could be unequivocally identified. Results support the previous assumption that light activates distinct mechanisms and transmitters in Limulus photoreceptors.

The light-induced rise in cytosolic calcium starts later than the receptor current of the Limulus ventral photoreceptor

The intracellular arsenazo signal indicating the transient light-evoked change in cytosolic Ca2+ (or Sr2+) concentration was measured in Limulus ventral photoreceptors simultaneously with the receptor current under voltage clamp conditions at 15 degrees C. The latency of the light-evoked arsenazo response was consistently more than 25 msec longer than the latency of the electrical light response (receptor current or -potential). Replacing calcium by strontium in the superfusate caused, within 30-40 min, reversible changes: an enlargement of the arsenazo response and a considerable prolongation of both latencies, that of the electrical and that of the arsenazo response; the difference between the two latencies, however, stayed essentially constant.

Biophysical processes in invertebrate photoreceptors: recent progress and a critical overview based on Limulus photoreceptors

Limulus ventral nerve photoreceptor, a classical preparation for the study the phototransduction in invertebrate eyes, seems to have a very complex mechanism to transform light energy into a physiological signal. Although the main function of the photoreceptor is to change the membrane conductance according to the illumination, the cell has voltage-activated conductances as well. The voltage-gated conductances are matched to the light-activated ones in the sense that they make the function of the cell more efficient. The complex mechanism of phototransduction and the presence of four different voltage-gated conductance in Limulus ventral nerve photoreceptors indicate that these cells are far less differentiated than the photoreceptor cells of vertebrates. Indications accumulated in recent years support the view that the ventral photoreceptor of Limulus has different light-activated macroscopic current components, ion channels and terminal transmitters. After conclusions from macroscopic current measurements (Payne, 1986; Payne et al. 1986 a, b), direct evidence was presented by single-channel (Nagy & Stieve, 1990 a, b; Nagy, 1990 a, b) and macroscopic current measurements (Deckert et al. 1991 a, b) for three different light-activated conductances. It has been shown that two of these conductances are stimulated by two different excitation mechanisms. The two mechanisms, having different kinetics, release probably two different transmitters. One of them might be the cGMP (Johnson et al. 1986), the other one the calcium ion (Payne et al. 1986 a, b). However, the biochemical processes which link the rhodopsin molecules and the ion channels are not known. The unknown chemical details of the phototransduction result in a delay for the mathematical description of the biophysical mechanisms. More biochemical details are known about the adaptation mechanism. It was found that inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate is a messenger for the release of calcium ions from the intracellular stores and that calcium ions are the messengers for adaptation (Payne et al. 1986 b; Payne & Fein, 1987). Concerning the mechanism of calcium release, it was revealed that a negative feedback acts on the enzyme cascade to regulate the internal calcium level and to protect the stores against complete emptying (Payne et al. 1988, 1990). Calcium ions also play an important role in the excitation mechanism. (a) In [Ca2+]i-depleted cells the light-induced current was increased after intracellular Ca2+ injection, suggesting that calcium is necessary for the transduction mechanism (Bolsover & Brown, 1985).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Phototransduction: different mechanisms in vertebrates and invertebrates

The photoreceptor cells of invertebrate animals differ from those of vertebrates in morphology and physiology. Our present knowledge of the different structures and transduction mechanisms of the two animal groups is described. In invertebrates, rhodopsin is converted by light into a meta-rhodopsin which is thermally stable and is usually re-isomerized by light. In contrast, photoisomerization in vertebrates leads to dissociation of the chromophore from opsin, and a metabolic process is necessary to regenerate rhodopsin. The electrical signals of visual excitation have opposite character in vertebrates and invertebrates: the vertebrate photoreceptor cell is hyperpolarized because of a decrease in conductance and invertebrate photoreceptors are depolarized owing to an increase in conductance. Single-photon-evoked excitatory events, which are believed to be a result of concerted action (the opening in invertebrates and the closing in vertebrates) of many light-modulated cation channels, are very different in terms of size and time course of photoreceptors for invertebrates and vertebrates. In invertebrates, the single-photon events (bumps) produced under identical conditions vary greatly in delay (latency), time course and size. The multiphoton response to brighter stimuli is several times as long as a response evoked by a single photon. The single-photon response of vertebrates has a standard size, a standard latency and a standard time course, all three parameters showing relatively small variations. Responses to flashes containing several photons have a shape and time scale that are similar to the single-photon-evoked events, varying only by an amplitude scaling factor, but not in latency and time course. In both vertebrate and invertebrate photoreceptors the single-photon-evoked events become smaller (in size) and faster owing to light adaptation. Calcium is mainly involved in these adaptation phenomena. All light adaptation in vertebrates is primarily, or perhaps exclusively, attributable to calcium feedback. In invertebrates, cyclic AMP (cAMP) is apparently another controller of sensitivity in dark adaptation. The interaction of photoexcited rhodopsin with a G-protein is similar in both vertebrate and invertebrate photoreceptors. However, these G-proteins activate different photoreceptor enzymes (phosphodiesterases): phospholipase C in invertebrates and cGMP phosphodiesterase in vertebrates. In the photoreceptors of vertebrates light leads to a rapid hydrolysis of cGMP which results in closing of cation channels. At present, the identity of the internal terminal messenger in invertebrate photoreceptors is still unsolved.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Temporal relationships of latency and magnitudes of Limulus ventral photoreceptor potentials elicited by two light pulses

As the dark interval between two stimulating light pulses increases, the latent period of the ensuing receptor potential increases to an asymptote reached about midway during the latency and is, thereafter, constant. The latent period is thus divisible into two segments, the first of which is light sensitive and the second not. The possible significance of these segments has been explored [12]. During the time the latent period is increasing toward its limiting value, the magnitudes of both components of the receptor potential are constant and maximal. The magnitude of the first component of the receptor potential begins to decline at a pulse interval of 15 msec, signify that the contribution of photons incident on the photoreceptor from the second pulse is diminishing. The magnitude of the second component of the receptor potential begins to decline at a pulse interval of 20 msec, suggesting that the contribution of photons delivered by the first pulse is diminishing. These results demonstrate that the two pulse stimulating paradigm reveals two segments of the receptor potential latent period and the ability of the photoreceptor to integrate radiant energy incident during the latent period, as measured by receptor potential magnitude.

Light-evoked depolarizations in the retina of Strombus: role of sodium and potassium ions

Light-evoked depolarizations (LED's) in retinal cells of Strombus luhuanus can exhibit an early phase of depolarization (DE), a brief repolarizing phase (RE), and a later depolarizing phase (DL). Lowering external Na+ by substitution with choline, tetramethylammonium or sucrose, reduced the amplitude of the entire LED, but DL was reduced more than DE. Replacement of Na+ with Li+ reduced DE more than DL. Lowering pH reduced DL more than DE, while raising it increased DL but not DE. K+ channel blocking agents, tetraethylammonium and 4-aminopyridine, increased RE. During the LED, cell membrane conductance increased in two phases, corresponding to DE and DL. The results suggest LED generation by two separable conductance increases to Na+, corresponding to DE and DL, and another to K+ during RE.

Two latent period processes in Limulus ventral photoreceptors

The latent period of Limulus ventral photoreceptor potentials consists of two contiguous time segments, S1 and S2, which exhibit the following properties: (1) the duration of S1 is inversely dependent on the incident energy provided by the first stimulating light flash; (2) the duration of S1 is prolonged in the presence of GTP-gamma-S [guanosine-5'-0- (3-thiotriphosphate)] or papaverine; (3) the duration of S1 is abbreviated in the presence of sodium vanadate or chlorobutanol; (4) the duration of S2 is abbreviated by light adaptation; and (5) the duration of S2 is prolonged more than S1 in a low temperature environment. The existence of these two components of the Limulus ventral photoreceptor potential latent period is demonstrable both in dark adapted photoreceptors, using single constant intensity light pulses of varying duration, or in partially light adapted photoreceptors, using a stimulating conditioning pulse-test pulse sequence. On the basis of these results it is tentatively concluded that the two segments of the latent period of Limulus ventral photoreceptor potentials are occupied by different processes. The first process, occupying the S1 segment, generates a critical concentration of a photoproduct which, directly or indirectly, eventually alters the conductance of the active photoreceptor membrane. The second process, occupying the S2 segment, is concerned with the initiation of the SPFs which sum to produce the receptor potential. It is possible that the hydrolysis of GTP actively participates in the first process.

Apparent delay between light-induced receptor current and receptor potential in the Limulus ventral nerve photoreceptor

We measured receptor potential (ReP) and receptor current (ReC) under voltage-clamp conditions alternatingly evoked by successive identical 10 ms light flashes in the ventral nerve photoreceptor of Limulus. At high stimulus intensities the apparent latency of the ReP is 4-15 ms shorter than that of the ReC. At lower light intensities the difference is even larger. High amplification reveals that the light response starts with two phases corresponding to two current components. The initial first current component rises linearly, is much smaller than the second one and therefore is not detected with standard amplification. This first component, which is more pronounced at low light stimulus intensities, is caused either by a displacement or by a weak ionic current.