Antipyretic analgesics in patients on antiepileptic drug therapy

Management of COVID-19 in patients with seizures: Mechanisms of action of potential COVID-19 drug treatments and consideration for potential drug-drug interactions with anti-seizure medications

In regard to the global pandemic of COVID-19, it seems that persons with epilepsy (PWE) are not more vulnerable to get infected by SARS-CoV-2, nor are they more susceptible to a critical course of the disease. However, management of acute seizures in patients with COVID-19 as well as management of PWE and COVID-19 needs to consider potential drug-drug interactions between antiseizure drugs and candidate drugs currently assessed as therapeutic options for COVID-19. Repurposing of several licensed and investigational drugs is discussed for therapeutic management of COVID-19. While for none of these approaches, efficacy and tolerability has been confirmed yet in sufficiently powered and controlled clinical studies, testing is ongoing with multiple clinical trials worldwide. Here, we have summarized the possible mechanisms of action of drugs currently considered as potential therapeutic options for COVID-19 management along with possible and confirmed drug-drug interactions that should be considered for a combination of antiseizure drugs and COVID-19 candidate drugs. Our review suggests that potential drug-drug interactions should be taken into account with drugs such as chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir while remdesivir and tocilizumab may be less prone to clinically relevant interactions with ASMs.

Interpretation of drug levels: relevance of plasma protein binding

Many centrally acting drugs bind extensively to plasma proteins, particularly albumin. It is generally the free concentration rather than the total concentration which determines the intensity of pharmacological action and the distribution and rate of elimination of a drug. Measurement of the total plasma concentration may therefore give a false idea of the amount of active drug available. Furthermore, variation in the degree of binding from one subject to another, and displacement of drug molecules by a second drug, may complicate the interpretation of serum levels when both bound and free drug are measured together. The strict use of therapeutic ranges of serum levels may therefore be harmful when a larger than normal proportion of the drug is free. In theory, monitoring the free concentration would have advantages, but on a routine basis this is not practical at present for technical reasons. Cerebrospinal fluid is an ultrafiltrate of plasma but lumbar puncture for routine monitoring purposes cannot be justified. Monitoring salivary concentrations is a practical alternative but for some drugs variation in the degree of ionization of the compound may make salivary levels unreliable.

Protein binding of aspirin and salicylate measured by in vivo ultrafiltration

OBJECTIVE

Methods for measuring protein binding of drugs generally require direct measurement of the concentration of unbound drug and thus may require a highly sensitive assay. In vivo ultrafiltration has been used to determine protein binding of endogenous substances. We have examined its value for measuring protein binding of drugs because it requires measurement of only the concentration of total drug, not unbound drug, in plasma.

METHODS

The protein binding of aspirin and its metabolite salicylate was measured in 29 healthy subjects 20 minutes after a single oral dose of 600 mg soluble aspirin, by the new method, in vivo ultrafiltration, as well as by a standard method, in vitro ultracentrifugation.

RESULTS

The data for salicylate were examined systematically to determine the optimal method of determining estimates of protein binding by in vivo ultrafiltration. Estimates of protein binding of salicylate were 81.7% +/- 10.1% (mean +/- SD) by the in vivo method and 81.6% +/- 11.3% by in vitro ultracentrifugation. Bland-Altman analysis of agreement showed that within-individual differences in percentage of protein binding determined by the two methods did not differ significantly from zero (mean difference, 0.07%; 95% confidence interval, -2.33 to +2.46). There was a highly significant correlation between estimates of protein binding by the two methods (r = 0.82; p = 0.001). Protein binding of aspirin was estimated of protein binding by the two methods (r = 0.82; p = 0.001). Protein binding of aspirin was estimated at 58.3% +/- 9.6% by in vivo ultrafiltration and could not be estimated by in vitro ultracentrifugation because the concentration of unbound aspirin in plasma was below the limit of detection for the assay.

CONCLUSION

In vivo ultrafiltration can be used to measure protein binding of drugs and has potential advantages over conventional methods. A sensitive assay may not be required because the unbound drug need not be measured, measurement in vivo may maintain more physiologic conditions, and it may be useful in measuring protein binding of drugs that are degraded rapidly in vitro.

Antiepileptic drugs. A review of clinically significant drug interactions

Approximately 20 to 30% of patients with active intractable epilepsy are commonly treated with polytherapy antiepileptic drug regimens, and these patients may experience complicated drug interactions. Furthermore, because of the long term nature of treatment, the possibility of drug interactions with drugs used for the treatment of concomitant disease is high. Classically, clinically significant drug interactions, both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic, have been considered to be detrimental to the patient, necessitating dosage adjustment. However, this need not always be the case. With the introduction of new drugs (e.g. vigabatrin and lamotrigine) with known mechanisms of action, the possibility exists that these can be used synergistically. The most commonly observed clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions can be attributed to interactions at the metabolic and serum protein binding levels. The best known examples relate to induction (e.g. phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine and primidone) or inhibition [e.g. valproic acid (sodium valproate)] of hepatic monoxygenase enzymes. The extent and direction of interactions between the different antiepileptic drugs are varied and unpredictable. Interactions in which the metabolism of phenobarbital, phenytoin or carbamazepine is inhibited are particularly important since these are commonly associated with toxicity. Some inhibitory drugs include macrolide antibiotics, chloramphenicol, cimetidine, isoniazid and numerous sulphonamides. A reduction in efficacy of antibiotic, cardiovascular, corticosteroid, oral anticoagulant and oral contraceptive drugs occurs during combination therapy with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs. Discontinuation of the enzyme inducer or inhibitor will influence the concentrations of the remaining drug(s) and may necessitate dosage readjustment.

The problems and pitfalls of NSAID therapy in the elderly (Part II)

The elderly are most susceptible to pharmacokinetic drug interactions between various NSAIDs and anticoagulants, sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents, certain anticonvulsants, methotrexate, digoxin, aminoglycosides and lithium. Pharmacodynamic interactions between some NSAIDs and antihypertensive drugs, anticoagulants, sulphonylurea agents and other NSAIDs are also potentially significant in the elderly. Despite the finding that mean therapeutic responses of large groups of patients have been generally equivalent for the wide range of NSAIDs studied thus far, it is also apparent that marked variability exists in the response of individual patients to different NSAIDs. Subsequent dosage increments may predispose 'nonresponders' and some less sensitive 'responders' to toxicity from NSAIDs. This interindividual variability in response to NSAIDs may be contributed to by the differing physicochemical properties of NSAIDs, physician prescribing habits and patient expectations, variations in NSAID pharmacokinetics, and the differing effects of NSAIDs other than their common ability to inhibit prostaglandin synthesis. The principles for drug prescribing in the elderly are no different from those that should be applied to the prescribing of medication in any patient. The clinician should strive to make a diagnosis and should avoid treating symptoms in isolation. Critical assessment of the indication for prescribing NSAID therapy must include consideration of the available effective and safe alternatives. If an NSAID is commenced the lowest effective dose should be the desired goal, but after an appropriate trial it is acceptable clinical practice to employ an alternative NSAID. There is no justification for combination NSAID therapy. The progress of each patient must be carefully monitored, particularly during the first few months of treatment, while periodic review of the ongoing need for the NSAID is essential.

Clinically relevant anti-epileptic drug interactions

Anti-epileptic drugs frequently interact due to pharmacokinetic features (induction or inhibition of metabolism, production of active metabolites, low therapeutic indices) and the need for prolonged treatment with possible addition of other drugs to treat concomitant diseases. The most important pharmacokinetic interactions are those that inhibit phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbitone metabolism and thus increase their toxicity. Drugs inhibiting metabolism include antibiotic macrolides, chloramphenicol, isoniazide, some sulphonamides, propoxyphene, cimetidine, valproic acid and sulthiame. Anti-epileptic drugs can induce hepatic microsomal enzymes and, therefore, may increase metabolism of corticosteroids, oral contraceptives, oral anticoagulants, cardiovascular agents, antibiotics, chemotherapeutic agents, psychotropic drugs and non-opiate analgesics, thereby reducing their efficacy. Advantageous pharmacodynamic interactions include synergism of ethosuximide plus valproic acid and of carbamazepine plus valproic acid. A pharmacodynamic mechanism may be responsible for the reduced sensitivity of chronically treated epileptics to some neuromuscular blockers.

Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations in the elderly. An update

There are numerous studies of drug handling in the elderly, but it is difficult to assess the significance of changes seen in vitro, or after single-dose administration, because they are often compensated by other mechanisms at steady-state. However, a knowledge of these studies is important as the results alert the investigator to possible treatment problems. The high incidence of adverse drug reaction in the elderly population leaves no doubt that improvements in therapy are needed. Research has been directed at seeking patterns of abnormality in the elderly on which to base recommendations for alterations in dosage regimens. The major shortcoming of this approach has been the failure to distinguish between the effect of chronological age on drug pharmacokinetics, and drug kinetics in elderly people with multiple pathology. The latter concern appreciates the variety of factors involved and the importance of treating each patient as an individual: presentation of mean data is confusing and misleading. The objective of drug treatment in any age group, but particularly in the elderly, is to administer the smallest possible dose which gives adequate therapeutic benefit throughout the entire dosage interval with the minimum of side effects. For most drugs the safe starting dose in the elderly is one-third to half that recommended in the young. Vigilance for potential side effects with plasma concentration monitoring, if available, should help keep toxicity to a minimum. When other medications are added or changed, the possibility of interaction should be anticipated. Methods for individualisation of dosage regimens and the use of sustained-release formulations in the elderly are discussed. Dosage alteration in the elderly in terms of reduced dose frequency, rather than dose size, may help improve compliance. A knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of a drug helps determine which approach will be most beneficial.

Changes in serum anticonvulsant levels with febrile illness in children with epilepsy

Changes in anticonvulsant serum levels during intercurrent illness may cause toxicity or decreased seizure control in children with epilepsy. We studied prospectively the effect of intercurrent illness and its treatment in 111 children being treated with AC monotherapy. Free fraction and total serum AC levels were determined when the child was well, on the fifth day of any illness with fever and one month after recovery. There were 55 episodes of febrile illness in 39 children during the study period. Twelve illnesses were associated with significant increases or decreases in serum AC levels; 7 children became clinically toxic; 1 child had increased seizures during illness. The mechanisms of AC level changes appeared to include interaction with antibiotics, with antipyretics or with viral illness. Amoxycillin and acetaminophen did not appear to interact with the AC's used. Physicians caring for children with epilepsy should be aware of the frequency and complexity of potential interactions between intercurrent febrile illness and anticonvulsant medication.

Interactions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

As NSAIDs are commonly used in patients receiving concomitant drug therapy, there is a risk of clinically significant drug interactions. Important interactions with NSAIDs involve one or both of two major mechanisms: pharmacokinetic (e.g. lithium, phenytoin and barbiturates) and pharmacodynamic (e.g. antihypertensive agents, diuretics). Prescription of a NSAID should be preceded by a careful evaluation of any coexisting pathology (such as renal dysfunction or hypertension) or concurrent drug therapy (such as anticonvulsant or anticoagulant agents) which may predispose a patient to the development of an interaction with potentially severe effects.

Drug-drug and drug-disease interactions with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may cause a number of drug interactions. They can displace other drugs from serum proteins, and some can affect the metabolism or decrease the renal elimination of other drugs. In addition, they can attenuate the pharmacologic effect of other drugs, such as diuretic and antihypertensive agents, without affecting their disposition. Lastly, many disease states and aging can affect the handling of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, mandating dose adjustment of some of these agents in certain clinical conditions. Some drugs may require more of these adjustments than others.

Free level monitoring of antiepileptic drugs. Clinical usefulness and case studies

The free fraction of phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid shows considerable interindividual variability, especially in the presence of associated disease or drug interactions. When binding is altered, the total concentration no longer reflects the amount of pharmacologically active drug in the plasma: this may mislead the clinician into making inappropriate dosage adjustments. Measuring the free drug concentration eliminates a potential source of interpretative errors and may be preferentially used to monitor therapy in selected patients.

Pharmacokinetic investigation of the interaction of azapropazone with phenytoin

We have investigated the interaction of azapropazone with phenytoin in five healthy volunteers. From steady-state plasma phenytoin concentrations of about 17 mumol/l there was at least a two-fold increase following the introduction of azapropazone. The main mechanism of the interaction was a decrease in phenytoin clearance, attributable to competitive inhibition by azapropazone of phenytoin p-hydroxylation. Protein-binding of phenytoin in the plasma (as assessed by salivary phenytoin concentrations) was significantly reduced from 92 to 90% by azapropazone and similar changes occurred in in vitro studies of [3H]-phenytoin protein binding.

Pharmacokinetic interactions with antiepileptic drugs

A large number of pharmacokinetic interactions with antiepileptic drugs have been reported in recent years. Among the interactions affecting the disposition of anticonvulsants, the most important are probably those resulting in inhibition of the metabolism of phenytoin, phenobarbitone and carbamazepine. Drugs which have been shown to inhibit the metabolism of these anticonvulsants and to precipitate clinical signs of intoxication in epileptic patients include sulthiame, valproic acid, chloramphenicol, certain sulphonamides, phenylbutazone, isoniazid and propoxyphene. Interactions affecting the plasma protein binding of antiepileptic drugs are less likely to cause long-lasting alterations in response, but they are important because they change the relationship between serum drug concentrations and clinical effect. Anticonvulsant agents may induce important alterations in the pharmacokinetics of other drugs. Phenytoin and phenobarbitone may decrease the gastrointestinal absorption of frusemide and griseofulvin, respectively. Many of the drugs used in the treatment of the adult epilepsies, including phenytoin, phenobarbitone, primidone and carbamazepine, are potent inducers of the hepatic microsomal enzymes. This results in an increased rate of metabolism and decreased clinical efficacy of a number of drugs, including dicoumarol, steroid oral contraceptives, metyrapone, glucocorticoid agents, doxycycline, quinidine and vitamin D.

Drug interactions with phenytoin

Drug interactions with phenytoin are a frequent occurrence, although their clinical relevance has often been overemphasised. Probably the most important of such interactions are those resulting in inhibition of phenytoin metabolism: due to the saturable nature of phenytoin biotransformation even minor degrees of inhibition can produce disproportionate changes in both steady-state serum concentration and the magnitude of pharmacological effect. Phenytoin has marked enzyme-inducing properties and can stimulate the metabolism of many concurrently administered drugs, thereby reducing their therapeutic efficacy. Clinically important examples of such interactions include a reduction of the anticoagulant effect of dicoumarol, a decrease in the prophylactic efficacy of the contraceptive pill and failure of response to various corticosteroid agents when administered therapeutically or diagnostically. Unless complicated by additional mechanisms, plasma protein binding interactions with phenytoin are seldom of clinical significance. However, they may alter considerably the relationship between serum drug concentration and clinical response, a possibility which needs to be taken into account when interpreting serum phenytoin levels in clinical practice.

Cimetidine-phenytoin interaction: effect on serum phenytoin concentration and antipyrine test

In a prospective study in nine patients the effects of phenytoin and of cimetidine (1000 mg/day) + phenytoin on the antipyrine test and serum phenytoin concentrations were studied. Serum phenytoin increased from the steady state level of 5.7 +1.3 mg/l to 9.1 +1.4 mg/l after three weeks on cimetidine (p less than 0.01), and fell to 5.8 +1.2 mg/l within two weeks after withdrawal of cimetidine. The protein binding of phenytoin was not changed by cimetidine. After use of phenytoin for 2-4 months, antipyrine clearance increased from 0.67 +0.06 ml/min/kg to 1.61 +0.22 ml/min/kg, and antipyrine half-live fell from 10.9 +1.3 h to 4.5 +0.6 h as compared to the values before phenytoin treatment (p less than 0.01). After three weeks combined use of cimetidine and phenytoin, antipyrine clearance was decreased to 1.01 +0.07 ml/min/kg and antipyrine half-life was prolonged to 6.1 +0.5 h, (p less than 0.01) compared to the values on phenytoin alone. The distribution volume of antipyrine was not affected by phenytoin nor by cimetidine + phenytoin. The half-life of cimetidine was 2.8 +0.3 h in the patients in the longterm phenytoin treatment. There was a significant positive correlation (p less than 0.001) between the increase in serum phenytoin concentration and the prolongation of antipyrine half-life caused by cimetidine. Thus, cimetidine increases serum phenytoin concentration, very probably by inhibiting its metabolism. Care should be taken in the concomitant use of cimetidine ad phenytoin, and the dose of phenytoin should be modified according to the clinical symptoms and serum phenytoin concentrations.

Influence of dextropropoxyphene on steady state serum levels and protein binding of three anti-epileptic drugs in man

Interactions between analgesics and anti-epileptic drugs may sometimes present a serious clinical problem. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of usually applied doses of dextropropoxyphene (DPX) on the steady state levels of carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (DPH) and phenobarbital (PB). Sixteen patients in monotherapy completed the trial, while four patients dropped out. In patients on CBZ serum levels increased (mean appr. 66%) after 6 days on DPX. In three of the patients a further increase was seen after an additional week on DPX. One patient discontinued the DPX intake because of clinical signs of toxicity, but the remainder were clinically unaffected. CBZ-epoxide levels declined simultaneously. For DPH only a doubtful increase was observed after 1-2 weeks on DPX. For PB an average increase of 20% in serum level was noted after 1 week. The protein binding of CBZ and DPH was not affected. It is concluded that patients on CBZ should be treated only with DPX if monitored properly. Patients on DPH or PB should be followed carefully until further evidence has been produced.