Experience with transplantation in the treatment of liver cancer

Pediatric liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma

Hepatoblastoma is the most common pediatric liver tumor and is usually diagnosed before five years of age. Treatment consists of a combination of chemotherapy and surgery, with the goal being attainment of complete local control by surgical resection and eradication of any extrahepatic disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is utilized and is often beneficial in rendering tumors resectable; however, prolonged chemotherapy administration attempting to render tumors resectable by conventional resection should be avoided. For patients whose tumors are too extensive to be conventionally resected, liver transplantation can be curative and remains the treatment of choice for eligible patients otherwise incurable by conventional resection.

Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Transplantation versus Resection: The Case for Liver Resection

The optimal surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma on well-compensated cirrhosis is controversial. Advocates of liver transplantation cite better long-term survival, lower risk of recurrence, and the ability of transplantation to treat both the HCC and the underlying liver cirrhosis. Transplantation, however, is not universally available to all appropriate-risk candidates because of a lack of sufficient organ donors and in addition suffers from the disadvantages of requiring a more complex pre- and postoperative management associated with risks of inaccessibility, noncompliance, and late complications. Resection, by contrast, is much more easily and widely available, avoids many of those risks, is by many accounts as effective at achieving similar long-term survival, and still allows for safe, subsequent liver transplantation in cases of recurrence. Here, arguments are made in favor of resection being easier, safer, simpler, and comparably effective in the treatment of HCC relative to transplantation, and therefore being the optimal initial treatment in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma on well-compensated cirrhosis.

Safety of minimal immunosuppression in liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma

BACKGROUND

Despite aggressive chemotherapy, recurrence of disease remains the leading cause of death after liver transplantation (LTx) for hepatoblastoma (HB). Unfortunately, little is known about the effects of immunosuppression on recurrence and posttransplant outcomes. We hypothesized that minimal immunosuppression can be safely used in these recipients.

METHODS

In 2004, we adopted a minimal immunosuppression regimen using daclizumab induction and tacrolimus monotherapy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2006, 6 children underwent primary LTx for HB with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Patient survival was 100% at 12 months and at 24 months, without graft loss. One patient died 28 months after transplantation. Recurrence-free survival was 83% at 12 months and at 24 months. Despite minimal immunosuppression (IS), 4 of 6 HB recipients remained rejection-free. When compared to other LTx recipients receiving minimal IS, HB recipients trended to have better rejection-free survival (HB, 83% at 12 months and 62.5% at 24 months vs all others, 36% and 36%, respectively; P = .19).

CONCLUSION

Our short-term patient and graft survival rates are comparable to those reported for all HB recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Although not statistically significant, our rejection-free survival data suggest that HB recipients may be less likely to reject than other recipients.

Liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma: results from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) study SIOPEL-1 and review of the world experience

BACKGROUND

For hepatoblastoma (HB) that remains unresectable by partial hepatectomy after chemotherapy, total hepatectomy with orthotopic liver transplantation (LTX) has been advocated as the best treatment option. The role of LTX in the overall management of HB is still, however, unclear.

PROCEDURE

The results of LTX from the first study of HB by the International Society of Pediatric Oncology, SIOPEL-1, were analyzed. In addition, the world experience of LTX for HB was extensively reviewed. Twelve patients in the SIOPEL-1 study underwent a LTX. Median (range) follow-up at Dec. 31, 2001 was 117 months (52-125) since LTX.

RESULTS

Overall survival at 10 years post-LTX was 85% for the seven children who received a "primary LTX" and 40% for the 5 children who underwent a "rescue LTX" after previous partial hepatectomy. In the world experience (147 cases), the overall survival rate at 6 year post-LTX was 82% for 106 patients who received a "primary LTX" and 30% for 41 patients who underwent a "rescue LTX." Multivariate analysis of patients undergoing primary LTX showed that only macroscopic venous invasion had a significant impact (P-value: 0.045 with a hazard ratio of 2.96) on overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthotopic LTX has added a new dimension to the treatment of HB unresectable by partial hepatectomy. Because of the rarity of the disease and to optimize results, children with extensive HB should be treated in centers with surgical expertise in pediatric major liver resection and LTX, in close collaboration with pediatric oncologists, radiologists, and histopathologists.

Indications and limitations of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cause of cancer-related death worldwide, yet remains difficult to treat, with dismal overall long-term survival rates. Recent strategies using liver transplantation for carefully selected patients with stage I and II HCC and cirrhosis have shown promising results, with 5-year survival rates comparable to survival rates for transplantation patients without malignancy. Currently, however, limited resources and a severe organ shortage make liver transplantation an option for only a limited number of patients with HCC in the United States. Future studies must document the long-term success of this therapy and improve methods for disease control before and after transplantation.

Liver transplantation in association with hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of the International Tumor Registry

Hepatocellular carcinoma is an epithelial tumor derived from hepatocytes that accounts for more than 80% of all primary hepatic tumors. The severity of the underlying disease is almost always the key factor in deciding whether to consider liver resection or transplantation as its treatment. Data in our registry corresponding to almost 800 patients from transplant centers throughout the world showed that patient survival after liver transplantation was significantly affected by histologic grade, tumor size >5 cm, and the presence of positive nodes. Recurrence-free survival showed a correlation with tumor size >5 cm, positive nodes, bilobar spread, and vascular invasion. At the present time, 59% of patients in our registry are alive, 84% of whom are free of tumor. Of those who died, half did so without evidence of tumor.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a registry report of the impact of tumor characteristics on outcome

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study from the International Registry of Hepatic Tumors in Liver Transplantation is to analyze the impact of tumor characteristics on tumor recurrence and patient survival.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Many attempts have been made to identify patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who can be treated successfully with liver transplantation. Studies presented to date lack enough patients to make reported findings universally accepted. In lieu of a prospective, randomized multicenter trial, in 1992 an International Registry of Hepatic Tumors in Liver Transplantation was established to collect data on these patients, their tumors, and their treatment.

METHODS

The registry mails out new patient registration forms and patient follow-up forms twice yearly to all known liver transplant programs. Fifty-three programs in 21 countries have supplied information on 553 patients with tumors. Four hundred ten patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 12 had the fibrolamellar variant of HCC (FLL-HCC). These 422 patients were investigated for this study. One hundred sixty-nine of these (40.0%) were classified as "incidental tumors." For the remaining patients, the tumor was known before the transplant. Twenty-six and eight tenths percent of the patients had a history of hepatitis B and 32.7% had a history of hepatitis C.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety patients (46.7%) have died, 99 free of tumor and 91 with tumor. Death was tumor related in 90 patients. Of the 232 patients now living, 215 are free of tumor and 17 have tumor. The most common sites for recurrence are the transplanted liver (41.7%) and the lungs (28.7%). The overall patient survival was 72.2% at 1 year, 63.4% at 2 years, 47.4% at 4 years, and 44.4% at 5 years. Using univariate analysis, incidental tumors (p = 0.3107), FLL-HCC (p = 0.0704), multifocal tumor (p = 0.5464), and bilobar tumor (p = 0.1024) were not found to have an influence on patient survival. Four factors, tumor size greater than 5 cm (p = 0.0221), vascular invasion (p = 0.0005), positive nodes (p = 0.0014), and histologic grade (p = 0.0001) had a profound impact on patient survival. Using Cox multiple regression analysis, only histologic grade had a negative impact on overall patient survival (p = 0.0009) and for patients with known tumors (p = 0.0003). For incidental tumors, patient survival was negatively influenced by multifocality (p = 0.0021) and an age older than 60 years (p = 0.0008). Tumor histologic grade (p = 0.0134) and size (>5 cm) (p = 0.0133) were significantly linked to recurrence-free patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis has documented three tumor characteristics that strongly impact patient survival after transplantation for HCC. In addition to tumor size greater than 5 cm and the presence of vascular invasion (which confirm several, single-center studies), this registry notes that a poorly differentiated HCC may be a contraindication for transplantation. A liver tumor's histologic grade may be important information to have when these patients are considered for liver transplantation.

Current and future treatment modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma

This article reviews recent innovations in the treatment of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which, although a common malignancy, has often proved difficult to diagnose and treat effectively. The epidemiology and natural history of HCC are discussed, as well as treatments such as hepatic resection, liver transplantation, and cryosurgery, among others.

Results of liver transplantation in children with unresectable liver tumors

Liver cancer is an uncommon indication for liver transplantation in children. Between 1986 and 1995, five children with hepatocellular cancer (HCC), three with hepatoblastoma (HEP), and one with sarcoma were referred to the transplant service. All nine tumors were considered unresectable. Four of the five children with HCC had underlying predisposing conditions (2 hepatitis B, 1 biliary atresia, 1 tyrosinemia). Preoperative evaluation of all patients included careful radiological screening and pretransplantation laparotomy for staging. Two patients with HCC were excluded from further consideration because of intraabdominal spread. Three patients had transplantation (mean age, 6.0 +/- 7.1 years), and all have survived for 1 to 5 years with no evidence of recurrence. Three patients with HEP were assessed (mean age 2.0 +/- 1 years); two had stage 4 disease and one had stage 3. All three received preoperative chemotherapy. The two with stage 4 had thoracotomies as part of their assessment. Two of three patients had a significant decrease in the size of the primary tumor during the waiting period. These two patients and one with stage 4 disease have survived more than 2 years since transplantation, with no recurrence. The third patient had recurrence within 2 months of transplantation. In summary, liver transplantation should be considered for all children who have unresectable hepatic malignancies, given the 83% survival rate and no evidence of tumor recurrence. Stage 4 disease in HEP does not necessarily exclude patients from transplantation. Early referral is encouraged so that tumor spread beyond the liver is minimized.

Orthotopic liver transplantation for preoperative early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience with orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for highly selected patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed the demographic, clinical, pathologic, and survival data on 21 patients with HCC who underwent OLT at the Mayo Clinic between 1985 and 1993.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The 21 patients were categorized into three groups: (1) those with incidental HCC (no evidence of HCC preoperatively), (2) those with a unicentric hepatic lesion without vascular invasion, and (3) those with an increased serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration but no detectable mass lesion in the liver.

RESULTS

For the seven patients with incidental HCC, the 2-year disease-free survival was 68.5%. For the eight patients with a mass lesion, the 2-year disease-free survival was only 50%. Operative staging revealed more advanced stage disease than had been found on preoperative assessment in five of these eight patients. For the six patients with an increased serum AFP value but no mass lesion, the 2-year disease-free survival was 80%. Tumor recurrence was the major cause of all deaths in this series.

CONCLUSION

Disease-free survival for patients with radiographic early-stage HCC was suboptimal because of understaging of the disease preoperatively. In contrast, our initial experience with OLT for patients with an increased serum AFP value in the absence of a mass lesion in the liver was favorable.

Current treatment modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the currently available treatment modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

One of the most common tumors worldwide, HCC has several known risk factors. Untreated HCC typically has a dismal prognosis. Early detection remains the key to successful treatment of this malignancy. Surgical resection has been the mainstay of treatment for HCC, but newer modalities have been recently introduced.

METHODS

The authors evaluated the treatment modalities for HCC.

RESULTS

Surgical resection affords 5-year survival rates as high as 45% with more favorable subgroups having 1) small tumors, 2) well-differentiated tumors, 3) unifocal tumors, 4) lack of vascular invasion, 5) absence of cirrhosis, and 6) the fibrolamellar variant (FL-HCC). Resection has been limited primarily by low resectability rates and recurrent disease. Newer therapeutic modalities that appear the most promising are transarterial chemoembolization and percutaneous ethanol injection. Neither therapy has been evaluated in a prospective randomized manner. Combination chemotherapy and surgical intervention may provide the best results, but randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed. As single-treatment modalities, radiation therapy, intravenous chemotherapy, intra-arterial chemotherapy, and immunotherapy play limited palliative roles.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection in the form of partial or total hepatectomy is the preferred treatment for HCC. The early detection of tumors by screening high-risk populations is crucial. Randomized trials of combinations of chemotherapy and surgical resection are needed to demonstrate their potential utility for treatment.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot study in 20 patients

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma yields disappointing results. Most cases recur within 2 years, often in the transplanted liver.

METHODS

A combination of neoadjuvant doxorubicin and orthotopic liver transplantation was used in 20 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma confined to the liver. Seventeen patients had tumors > 5 cm in greatest diameter, and 11 cases were stage IVA by the TNM classification. Doxorubicin was administered preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively at a dose of 10 mg/m2 weekly, totaling 200 mg/m2.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy was well tolerated although leukopenia was observed in 70% of patients. Eight patients died, five of recurrent tumor and three of hepatitis B. Three others remain alive 8-22 months after tumor recurrence. One patient had initial tumor recurrence in the allograft. Actuarial survival is 59% and tumor-free survival is 54% at 3 years. For the 17 patients with tumors > 5 cm, overall survival is 63% and tumor-free survival is 49% at 3 years.

CONCLUSION

The results of this pilot study suggest that neoadjuvant doxorubicin chemotherapy favorably alters the post-transplant survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Reappraisal of the role of liver transplantation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma arising in cirrhosis

Several retrospective analyses have recently shown the advantage of liver transplantation (OLT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at early tumor stages. Preliminary results of a prospective series of OLT for unresectable small HCC arising in cirrhosis are reported. Eighteen out of 22 patients (82%) are alive without evidence of HCC recurrence after a median follow-up of 11 months.

Liver transplantation in malignant primary hepatic neoplasms

Between April 1986 and August 1990, 151 liver transplantations were performed at our institution, 16 (11%) of them in 14 patients with primary hepatic tumors. There were 12 hepatocellular carcinomas, 1 angiosarcoma, and 1 Klatskin tumor. None of the tumors was resectable, and there was no preoperative evidence of extrahepatic tumoral extension. Exploratory laparotomy was performed prior to transplantation in three patients and selective embolization of the tumor in six patients. There was no difference in the intraoperative requirements for blood or plasma in the patients with hepatic tumors when compared with other transplant recipients (28.6 +/- 23.6 units packed red blood cells [PRBC] versus 20.1 +/- 17.8 units PRBC, and 17.9 +/- 12.2 units plasma versus 17.1 +/- 10.5 units plasma, respectively). Extracorporeal venovenous bypass was used in all but one patient. There was no significant differences in the incidence of acute rejection or in the length of hospitalization in these patients when compared with other transplant recipients. All patients received triple immunosuppressive therapy (corticosteroids, azathioprine, and cyclosporin A). Intraoperative mortality was zero. At a mean of 13.3 months' follow-up (range: 1 to 47 months), 2 of 14 patients had died of sepsis and 1 of terminal cirrhosis (autopsies revealed no evidence of tumor recurrence); 3 patients (21%) had recurrences of the tumor (1 in the central nervous system and liver, and the other 2 in the lung). One of the three patients with a recurrent tumor is still alive after 16 months. The remaining nine patients (64%) are still alive.

Percutaneous ethanol injection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. A study on 207 patients

In 207 cirrhotic patient carriers of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) was administered with ultrasound guidance. The patients were classified as Child's Class A, 136; B, 54; and C, 17. Their mean age was 63.5 years, and the male-female ratio was 3.5:1. There was a single HCC less than 5 cm in diameter in 162 patients; 45 had more than one HCC. The follow-up ranged from 5 to 71 months (mean, 25 months). No noteworthy complications occurred during or after 2485 treatments. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival percentages (by the Kaplan-Meier method) for the patients with one HCC were 90%, 80%, and 63%, respectively. The corresponding percentages by Child's class were 97%, 92%, and 76% for Class A; 88%, 68%, and 42% for B; and 40%, 0%, and 0% for C. The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates for patients with more than one HCC were 90%, 67%, and 31% respectively. These results were similar to those found by others and showed that PEI was a safe, reproducible, easy-to-do, and low-cost therapeutic technique. In terms of survival, these PEI results were better than the published results of no treatment and equivalent to those of surgery. In uncontrolled series, bias can play an important role. Therefore, additional trials would be useful.

Percutaneous ethanol injection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. A study on 207 patients

In 207 cirrhotic patient carriers of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) was administered with ultrasound guidance. The patients were classified as Child's Class A, 136; B, 54; and C, 17. Their mean age was 63.5 years, and the male-female ratio was 3.5:1. There was a single HCC less than 5 cm in diameter in 162 patients; 45 had more than one HCC. The follow-up ranged from 5 to 71 months (mean, 25 months). No noteworthy complications occurred during or after 2485 treatments. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival percentages (by the Kaplan-Meier method) for the patients with one HCC were 90%, 80%, and 63%, respectively. The corresponding percentages by Child's class were 97%, 92%, and 76% for Class A; 88%, 68%, and 42% for B; and 40%, 0%, and 0% for C. The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates for patients with more than one HCC were 90%, 67%, and 31% respectively. These results were similar to those found by others and showed that PEI was a safe, reproducible, easy-to-do, and low-cost therapeutic technique. In terms of survival, these PEI results were better than the published results of no treatment and equivalent to those of surgery. In uncontrolled series, bias can play an important role. Therefore, additional trials would be useful.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical results and future aspects

The treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by liver transplantation remains controversial. In our series, the 5-year survival value for 87 patients who underwent transplantations between 1972 and 1990 was 19.6%. There was no difference in the long-term survival of patients who had underlying cirrhosis and those who did not. In patients with early-stage tumors the long-term prognosis was improved, the 5-year survival in stage II disease being 55.6% according to UICC criteria. Even in some cases of more advanced tumour stage, good long-term results were obtained. In a review of the recent literature, we evaluated prognostic factors to work out criteria for a more differentiated indication for liver transplantation. Resection of increased radicality--which will keep its place as the therapy of choice--and transplantation should be performed complementarily. Further developments will reveal the value of multimodal therapeutic strategies, including chemo-embolisation, chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Initial two-year results of the Oregon Liver Transplantation Program

During the first 24 months of the Oregon Liver Transplantation Program, which began in October 1988, 94 patients were formally evaluated and 47 adults underwent 54 liver transplantations. Thirty-four percent of patients were veterans. The recipient operation lasted a mean of 7.4 hours (range: 4 to 16 hours). Veno-venous bypass was used routinely at first but selectively later (7 of the last 26 cases), resulting in reduced operating time. Hepatic artery reconstruction was end-to-end anastomosis in 52 cases and iliac conduit in 2. No arterial thrombosis occurred. Biliary reconstruction was choledochocholedochostomy in 83% and choledochojejunostomy in 17%. Biliary complications occurred in 28%. Operative mortality was 2%, and 1-year actual survival was 80%. Patients with hepatitis B fared worse, with four of six dying at a mean of 7.6 months. Overall, the median hospital stay was 30 days. Patients surviving more than 3 months had a mean Karnofsky score of 82%. No significant difference in outcome was noted in patients receiving prophylactic OKT3 monoclonal antibody (used in 45%) versus conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Overall, allograft rejection occurred in 55% of patients. Retransplantation was required in seven patients, three for primary graft nonfunction, two for uncontrolled rejection during induction therapy with OKT3, and two for graft failure secondary to recurrent hepatitis B.