High-dose cisplatin in disseminated melanoma: a comparison of two schedules

A phase II study of oxaliplatin, docetaxel, and GM-CSF in patients with previously treated advanced melanoma

PURPOSE

Although much focus has been placed on immunotherapy for melanoma, further development of chemotherapy approaches is needed. Melanoma is responsive to platinum compounds and taxanes, but there is limited experience with combinations of these agents. Oxaliplatin has been reported to have detectable activity in melanoma, and a phase I study has identified a tolerable dose and schedule of oxaliplatin in combination with docetaxel and hematopoietic growth factor support. GM-CSF has a theoretical advantage of immune potentiation. These considerations supported the study of oxaliplatin, docetaxel, and GM-CSF in patients with advanced melanoma.

METHODS

Eligibility included adequate organ function, PS<or=2, at most one prior chemotherapy and one prior immunotherapy, no prior treatment with oxaliplatin or taxanes and no chremophor allergy. After premedication, docetaxel was administered day 1 at 75 mg/m2, then oxaliplatin on day 2 at 85 mg/m2. GM-CSF (250 mcg/m2) was administered s.c. days 3-12. Cycles were 21 days in length, and disease reevaluation was performed every two cycles by RECIST criteria.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients received at least one cycle, eight with one prior systemic therapy, five with two prior systemic therapies. Five patients did not complete two cycles and were not formally evaluable for response. Five patients had stable disease (SD), including one who failed two prior therapies and went on to receive ten cycles. The remaining nine patients displayed progressive disease (PD) after two cycles. Notable toxicities included seven cases (37%) of grade III/IV neutropenia and two (11%) hypersensitivity reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination of oxaliplatin, docetaxel, and GM-CSF has limited clinical activity in previously treated patients with advanced melanoma. Exploration in treatment-naïve patients may still be warranted.

Retreatment with dose-dense weekly cisplatin after previous cisplatin chemotherapy is not complicated by significant neuro-toxicity

Cisplatin induces a cumulative dose-dependent axonal sensory neuropathy. With a cumulative dose over 600 mg/m2, a significant percentage of patients will develop a moderate or severe neuropathy. We retreated patients with progressive or recurrent ovarian cancer after previous platinum-containing chemotherapy with weekly 50-70 mg/m2 cisplatin for six cycles. This group was prospectively followed for the development of neuropathy. Patients received six weekly cycles of either 50 or 70 mg/m2 cisplatin, combined with oral etoposide. Responding patients continued treatment with daily oral etoposide for nine months. Neurological toxicity was assessed with a sensory sum score, the sensory neuropathy common toxicity criteria (CTC) and quantitated sensory analysis of the vibration perception threshold (VPT). Neurological assessment was scheduled at baseline, after three cycles, at the end of cisplatin chemotherapy and at 3 monthly intervals until 1 year after the discontinuation of chemotherapy. The first evaluation carried out in the interval of 1-4 months after the end of weekly cisplatin therapy was taken as the principle evaluation for neurotoxicity because during this time interval the nadir of cisplatin neurotoxicity is to be expected. Of 89 patients evaluated for neurological toxicity, 80 patients were fully evaluable. Forty-nine had received prior cisplatin (median cumulative dosage 450 mg/m2); the others had received prior treatment with carboplatin. Cisplatin pretreated patients had slightly higher neuropathy scores at the start of weekly cisplatin. Almost all cisplatin pretreated patients received six cycles of cisplatin, 29 at 50 mg/m2 and 20 at 70 mg/m2 per cycle. Despite treatment up to an overall cumulative dose of 750-900 mg/m2 cisplatin, only 1 patient discontinued treatment due to neurotoxicity. One other patient developed a grade 3 neuropathy during follow-up. Only a marginal increase of neuropathic signs and symptoms were observed in all the other patients. In multiple regression analysis, the increase in VPT or the sensory sum score was not related to prior treatment (cisplatin or carboplatin). Patients with mild signs of neuropathy after prior treatment with cisplatin to a cumulative dose level of 400-450 mg/m2 can be retreated with weekly cisplatin to a cumulative dose of 420 mg/m2 (overall cumulative dose up to 800-900 mg/m2) with only a minimal risk of significant neurotoxicity.

A phase II study of carboplatin, cisplatin, interferon-alpha, and tamoxifen for patients with metastatic melanoma

The purpose of this trial was to determine the toxicity and antineoplastic activity of cisplatin, carboplatin, tamoxifen, and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in patients with advanced melanoma. Eleven patients with metastatic melanoma were enrolled. The patients received carboplatin 400 mg/m2 i.v. on day 0; cisplatin 25 mg/m2 i.v. on days 7, 14, and 21; tamoxifen 20 mg p.o. b.i.d. on days 0-27; and interferon-alpha 5 million units/m2 subcutaneously 3 times per week. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Patients were assessed for tumor response at the end of 2 cycles. Toxicity was severe, with 14 of 24 cycles given requiring some form of dose reduction. Carboplatin dose reductions were related to bone-marrow toxicity, whereas IFN-alpha caused fatigue, arthralgias, myalgias, and fever. The overall response rate was 18% (2 partial responses [PRs]). The combination of cisplatin, carboplatin, tamoxifen, and IFN-alpha is active in advanced melanoma; however, the toxicity is unacceptable.

Gender and other survival predictors in patients with metastatic melanoma on Southwest Oncology Group trials

BACKGROUND

Some studies have suggested that women with metastatic malignant melanoma have a better survival rate than men. However, little is known about the effect of gender on survival in combination with other clinical variables and treatment variables. Thus, an analysis of 813 eligible patients from 15 consecutive Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) Phase II or III trials evaluating chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy for metastatic melanoma was performed.

METHODS

A multivariate Cox regression model was used.

RESULTS

Poor performance status (P < 0.001), more organ sites with metastases (OSM) (P < 0.001), liver involvement (P < 0.001), and nonliver visceral involvement (P = 0.01) were highly significant predictors of worse survival, whereas the disease free interval (P = 0.08) had borderline significance. After adjustment for all factors, there was no difference in overall survival between men and women (P = 0.19). Women had a longer disease free interval (P = 0.003) and fewer OSM (P = 0.004) at study registration than men.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study found that performance status, OSM, and type of visceral involvement were independent predictors of survival in patients with metastic malignant melanoma and should be used as stratification factors in future Phase III trials. However, the current study also found that gender did not appear to be a significant independent predictor of survival for this stage of disease. A longer disease free interval from initial diagnosis and fewer OSMs may partly explain the improved outcome reported for women in selected trials. The study concluded that further investigation of the biologic differences at early stage diagnosis should be undertaken to determine whether women truly have a different pace of disease progression and a different metastatic pattern.

Phase II trial of tirapazamine combined with cisplatin in chemotherapy of advanced malignant melanoma

PURPOSE

A phase II study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of tirapazamine (TPZ) combined with cisplatin (cDDP) in patients with metastatic melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 1994 and November 1995, 48 patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with TPZ (260 mg/m2, administered intravenously over two hours) followed in one-hour by cDDP (75 mg/m2 over one hour) every 21 days. Sixteen patients had received prior chemotherapy, and 13 of these had failed to respond to prior cDDP. None of the patients had symptomatic brain metastasis.

RESULTS

Nine patients had partial responses, with an overall response rate of 19% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 9%-33%). The median duration of response was six months. None of the responders had received prior chemotherapy. Responses were seen in 8 (33%, confidence interval of 16%-55%) of 24 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who had received no prior chemotherapy and in the only patient with previously untreated conjunctival melanoma. There were no responders among the seven patients with choroidal melanoma and 16 patients with previously treated cutaneous melanoma. Two patients with partial responses were rendered free of gross disease surgically three months after completing eight courses of TPZ-cDDP; they remain free of tumor recurrence. Responses were seen in lymph nodes (27%), lung (26%), skin (20%), adrenal gland (20%), soft tissues (17%) and liver (17%). Common toxicities included muscle cramps, fatigue, gastrointestinal effects and peripheral neuropathy. Fatigue, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and muscle cramps were grade 3 or 4 in less than 10% of the courses. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were rare.

CONCLUSION

The TPZ-cDDP combination has definite activity against chemotherapy-naïve patients with cutaneous melanoma and warrant further studies in combination with other cytotoxic agents.

Phase II study of a closely spaced ifosfamide--cisplatin schedule with the addition of G-CSF in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND

Ifosfamide and cisplatin are frequently combined cytotoxic agents. Both have a dose-response relationship. In view of this it appears attractive to study regimens with a higher dose intensity than usual. One way to increase the dose intensity is to shorten intervals between chemotherapy cycles. As bone marrow toxicity is dose limiting in ifosfamide-cisplatin combinations we started a phase II study with both drugs administered every 2 weeks in combination with G-CSF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer or malignant melanoma were eligible for the study. The treatment consisted of ifosfamide 2 gram/m2/day days 1-3 combined with mesna, and cisplatin 33 mg/m2/day days 1-3, administered in hypertonic saline (3% NaCl). G-CSF was started on day 4 at a dose of 5 micrograms/kg/day and was continued until day 12. The cycles were to be repeated every 2 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were entered in the study; 30 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Neutropenia (grade 4 in 16 patients) and thrombocytopenia (grade 4 in 15 patients) were the most common toxicities. Thrombocytopenia incidence and -duration increased per cycle and was the main cause of treatment delays especially after the third cycle. Only 4 patients were able to complete the planned treatment without any delay or dose reduction and reached the intended dose intensity of 3 gram/m2/week of ifosfamide and 50 mg/m2/week of cisplatin. Non haematologic toxicities were generally mild. Out of 22 evaluable patients with non-small cell lung cancer 6 responded (27%; 95% CI: 10%-48%) while only one out of 8 patients with melanoma responded. The median response duration was 26 weeks (range 16-36 weeks).

CONCLUSION

The planned high-dose intensity of ifosfamide and cisplatin could be reached only for the first 2-3 cycles. Haematologic toxicity, especially cumulative thrombocytopenia, necessitated treatment delays jeopardizing the dose intensity. The response rate in non-small-cell lung cancer and melanoma was not superior to what can be expected from more conventional regimens.

Neurotoxicity is not enhanced by increased dose intensities of cisplatin administration

It is uncertain whether intensive dosing schedules of cisplatin, intended to attain a higher anti-tumour efficacy, alter the severity of cisplatin-induced neuropathy. We assessed the development of neuropathy in three groups of patients treated with cisplatin in different dosing schedules. The severity of neuropathy was determined by measurement of the vibration perception threshold (VPT) before treatment and during follow-up for 2-12 months after the last cycle. 66 patients were treated with an intensive weekly regimen of doses varying from 70 to 85 mg/m2 in 1 day (trial A), 21 patients with a 3-weekly combination chemotherapy containing cisplatin 75 mg/m2 in 1 day (trial B) and 20 patients with a 3-weekly regimen containing cisplatin 20 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days (trial C). The mean dose intensity achieved was 59 mg/m2/week in trial A, 21 mg/m2/week in trial B and 33 mg/m2/week in trial C. The maximum post-treatment VPT correlated significantly with pretreatment VPT (P < 0.001) and with the cumulative dose of cisplatin (P < 0.001). Following correction for these two variables, the maximum posttreatment VPT did not show a statistically significant association with dose intensity. These results suggest that neuropathy is not related to dose intensity of cisplatin. This implies that treatment with more intensive dosing schedules, employing equal cumulative doses of cisplatin, does not result in a concomitant increase in neurotoxicity within a cumulative dose range of 280-675 mg/m2.

Phase I study of high-dose cisplatin, ifosfamide, and etoposide

To test the feasibility of a regimen of high-dose cisplatin, ifosfamide, and etoposide (VP-16; VIPP regimen), we registered 15 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in a phase I trial of the Northern California Oncology Group. One cycle of treatment consisted of high-dose cisplatin given at 100 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8, VP-16 given at 60-75 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1-3, plus ifosfamide given at 1.0-1.2 g/m2 i.v. on days 1-3; cycles were repeated every 28 days. There were 13 men and 2 women; the median age was 59 years (range, 47-72 years). The median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 90 (range, 70-100). All patients were assessable for toxicity and response. The median number of cycles delivered per patient was two (range, one to four). Hematologic toxicity was dose-limiting and required de-escalation of the ifosfamide and VP-16 doses. Ten patients developed a white blood count of < 1000/mm3 and seven patients developed a platelet count of < 50,000/mm3. The duration of cytopenia increased progressively with each subsequent cycle of therapy. Two patients required antibiotics for neutropenic fever with documented infections (pneumonia, bacteremia). Seven patients received red blood cell transfusions for a hemoglobin level of < 8 gm/dl. Grade III or IV non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon and involved one patient each with grade 3 ototoxicity and grade 3 neurotoxicity. Five patients developed laboratory evidence of renal salt wasting. The overall response rate was 33% (5/15) with a complete response being achieved by two patients (13%) and a partial response being attained by three (20%). The overall median survival was 44 weeks. We conclude that although this regimen demonstrated activity, hematologic toxicity limited its use in the palliative treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Using hemopoietic growth-factor support to permit dose escalation, this schedule of VIPP may be of interest in a number of different chemotherapy-sensitive tumor types.

Phase I/II study of a short course of weekly cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours

Twenty-five patients with advanced solid tumours were entered in a phase I/II study of six, weekly cycles of cisplatin. Nineteen patients were chemonaive and six were previously treated. The starting dose was 50 mg m-2 week-1. This dose could be escalated without major toxicity to 70 mg m-2 week-1. At a dose of 80 mg m-2 myelosuppression grade 3 occurred as well as grade 1 nephro- and neurotoxicity. The maximum tolerated dose was 85 mg m-2 with dose limiting thrombocytopenia. Hypertonic saline was effective in preventing nephrotoxicity. Ondansetron was a very effective antiemetic in the first weeks of treatment but its efficacy waned later on. Responses were observed in head and neck cancer, melanoma and mesothelioma. At the dose level of 80 mg m-2 the optimal dose intensity was reached. This schedule will be tested further in phase II studies.

Pilot study of a rapid etoposide-cisplatin regimen in paediatric soft tissue sarcomas

10 patients with refractory or relapsed soft tissue sarcoma were treated with weekly etoposide (150 mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 2). Toxicity was mainly myelosuppression which resulted in deviation from planned weekly chemotherapy scheduling. With this rapid dose-delivery schedule the tolerated median dose intensities were 161 mg/m2 per week for etoposide and 49 mg/m2 per week for cisplatin. In 9 evaluable patients there were 7 responses, 2 complete and 5 partial, giving a response rate of 78% (confidence interval 51-100%). The combination of etoposide and cisplatin in this schedule produced a higher response rate than reported with previous schedules and is worthy of further evaluation.