The epidemiology of shoulder dislocations

Arthroscopic Repair versus Conservative Treatment for first-time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

To systematically compare the clinical efficacy of conservative treatment and arthroscopic one-stage repair for patients with first-time anterior dislocation of the shoulder. A retrieval and systematic review of randomized controlled studies of primary anterior shoulder dislocation with conservative versus arthroscopic repair was conducted and further pooled analysis was performed to compare the overall difference in clinical outcomes, including redislocation and revision surgery rates, shoulder function scores and related complications. Preliminary meta-analysis showed that the risk of anterior shoulder redislocation was 4.73-fold higher in patients treated conservatively than those undergoing arthroscopic repair (RR:4.73 [2.95-7.58], p < 0.000; I2 = 0 %, p = 0.920),and that the revision surgery rate was 5.91 times higher in the conservative group than in the arthroscopic repair group (RR:5.91 [2.82-12.39], p < 0.000; I2 = 0 %, p = 0.560).Early arthroscopic repair can significantly reduce the redislocation and revision surgery rates and also improve the shoulder joint function score, without serious complications. However, it is necessary to recognize the subset of patients with a higher risk of redislocation in young patients through a high quality, blinded, prospective cohort study when early arthroscopic repair intervention in this subset of high-risk patients will be of significant clinical value.

Impact of an educational intervention utilising a three-dimensional-printed model for ultrasound-guided intra-articular injections of the dislocated shoulder

OBJECTIVE

Intra-articular injection of local anaesthetic provides safe and effective analgesia for patients with shoulder dislocation. We designed a three-dimensional-printed ultrasound model of the shoulder to educate ED clinicians on use of this technique. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a 1-h training session using this model on participants' knowledge, skills and clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of the clinicians working at two EDs in New Zealand. Participants (n = 20) took part in a 1-h educational session. We tested participants' performance before the session, afterwards and at 3 months using a 10-point objective structured clinical examination. We reviewed clinical records to determine whether there was increased utilisation of this technique among ED patients before and after the training.

RESULTS

There was improvement in participants' OCSE performance (median pre-training score = 4.00, median 3-month post-training score = 7.00, P = 0.044) and self-reported competence and knowledge, which were sustained to the end of the study. There was increased use of intra-articular injection among ED patients with shoulder dislocation: 2 of 68 patients (3%) before and 11 of 76 patients (14.5%) after the study. Notably, most were performed by clinicians who did not take part in the study (n = 9).

CONCLUSION

A 1-h training session using a three-dimensional-printed model improved participants objective structured clinical examination performance in ultrasound-guided injection of the shoulder joint. Although there was minimal change in the practice of participating clinicians, overall use of the procedure increased.

Management of the in-season athlete with an anterior shoulder dislocation

BACKGROUND

Management of the in-season athlete presenting with an anterior shoulder dislocation is a nuanced process that continues to be refined. Options and pathways between nonoperative and operative treatment have undergone many iterations over a century of orthopedic research and advancement. It requires an understanding of sport-specific demands and the individual athlete's goals. The orthopedic surgeon must have mastery of the natural history, treatment options, and outcomes of anterior shoulder dislocations. Balance of these factors is delicate and highly individualized for each athlete, and is why management of the in-season athlete with an anterior shoulder dislocation remains an art for the orthopedic surgeon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A narrative review of the literature regarding the in-season athlete with anterior shoulder dislocation was conducted of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The findings are summarized in this article.

RESULTS

Multiple studies have investigated management of the in-season athlete with anterior shoulder dislocation. Treatment is highly individualized for each athlete and their respective circumstances. Nonoperative treatment remains the only option for athletes that seek to return to play in the same season, however with a high risk of recurrence. Operative treatment has a track record of success in terms of returning to high level of play and lower recurrence, but would preclude a return to competition in the same season.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of the in-season athlete with anterior shoulder dislocation remains a challenging issue without consensus recommendation among shoulder surgeons. Much has been done to understand the pathology and delineate indications for nonoperative treatment and surgical management. Although recurrence and return to play rates have improved with each iteration, recurrent instability and revision surgery continue to occur at high rates. Therefore, additional work remains to optimize return to play as well as long-term outcomes for athletes.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Show No Relevant Change Between 1-Year and 2-Year Follow-Up After Treatment for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 1-year and 2-year follow-up after treatment for anterior shoulder instability.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials and prospective studies that evaluated and reported PROMs after a capsulolabral repair (with or without remplissage), bone augmentation, or nonoperative treatment to treat anterior shoulder instability at both 1-year and 2-year follow-up were included. PROMs were compared between 1-year and 2-year follow-up; forest plots with mean difference were created to compare baseline, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up; and scatterplots were created to visualize clinical improvement over time.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies, comprising 923 patients, with levels of evidence Level I and II were included. Nine PROMs, of which predominantly were the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI; 11 studies; 79%), were evaluated. Minimal to no statistically significant change in WOSI, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Subjective Shoulder Value, Simple Shoulder Test, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Quick DASH, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, or visual analog scale was observed between 1-year and 2-year follow-up. Pooling of the WOSI, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, ASES, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation demonstrated improvement from baseline to 1-year follow-up and minimal to no change between 1-year and 2-year follow-up. Scatterplots of the WOSI and ASES demonstrated the most improvement within 6 months and no clear improvement after 1-year follow-up. Recurrence rates increased with time but varied between studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to recurrence rates, which have been shown to increase with time, minimal to no statistically significant change was observed for any of the included PROMs between 1-year and 2-year follow-up. This finding raises the question as to whether it is necessary to evaluate PROMs in long-term follow-up of patients after shoulder stabilization treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, systematic review of Level I and II studies.

Anterior Labrum Periosteal Sleeve Avulsion Lesions of the Shoulder: A Scoping Review

Background

Anterior labrum periosteal sleeve avulsion (ALPSA) lesion of the shoulder is defined as a labral avulsion with an intact periosteum of the glenoid neck resulting in medial malattachment of the labrum, which is both nonanatomic and nonfunctional. It is relatively rare compared with Bankart lesions, and its results are usually reported in combination with other anterior labroligamentous lesions in the literature.

Purpose

To (1) assess the size and scope of the literature on ALPSA lesions, (2) highlight the importance of this lesion, and (3) distinguish between ALPSA and Bankart lesions in diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Study Design

Scoping review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched with the keywords "ALPSA,""anterior labrum periosteal sleeve avulsion,""anterior labral periosteal sleeve avulsion," and "anterior labroligamentous periosteal sleeve avulsion" lesion. Duplicate articles and those that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded, resulting in the identification of 42 relevant articles. Their references were analyzed for further data curation.

Results

This scoping review demonstrated that ALPSA lesions are difficult to clinically identify. Magnetic resonance angiography in the adduction internal rotation position is the most sensitive and specific imaging modality for identification. Optimal views are the anterosuperior portal for accurate identification and the anteroinferior portal for surgical repair during arthroscopy. Treatment begins with correctly identifying the labrum, in contradistinction to dense reactive fibrous tissue, and reattaching the labrum to the correct anatomic glenoid footprint. Chronic lesions with bone loss require either bone block or soft tissue augmentation procedures.

Conclusion

There is paucity of exclusive literature on ALPSA lesions. It is important to distinguish this lesion from the Bankart lesion as it is associated with worse outcomes. The higher failure rates of ALPSA lesion repair indicate that the current repair techniques require further refinement to improve the outcomes to the standard of Bankart lesions.

Bilateral combined fracture of the greater tuberosity with anterior internal shoulder dislocation

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Bilateral combined fractures of the greater tuberosity with anterior internal shoulder dislocation are extremely rare, presenting challenges in treatment due to their uncommon occurrence and lack of standardized management protocols.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a 22-year-old patient who experienced bilateral anterior shoulder dislocations with associated fractures of the greater tuberosities following a seizure-induced fall. Clinical Discussion: The unique aspect of our case is the unusual mechanism of injury. Unlike typical convulsive seizures, which often result in bilateral posterior dislocations, our patient suffered bilateral anterior dislocations and fractures of the greater tuberosities. Therapeutic management of greater tuberosity fractures lacks a standardized approach, but surgical intervention is warranted if displacement exceeds 0.5 cm. Treatment options include open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), percutaneous screw fixation, arthroscopic procedures with suture anchors for double-row repair, or a combination of arthroscopic techniques and screw fixation. ORIF with plate osteosynthesis may be recommended for comminuted fractures with large fragments. To assess functional outcomes, commonly used scoring systems include the UCLA Shoulder Score, ASES Score, and Constant-Murley Score.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral anterior shoulder dislocation associated with combined fractures of the greater tuberosity is an extremely rare occurrence. Given its anatomopathological significance and impact on functional recovery, careful and individualized management of greater tuberosity fractures is crucial, considering its role as a point of insertion for the rotator cuff tendons.

Open Bankart Repair with Subscapularis Split

Background

Anterior shoulder dislocations are a common injury, especially in the young, active, male population1. Soft-tissue treatment options for shoulder instability include arthroscopic or open Bankart repair, with open Bankart repair historically having lower rates of recurrence and reoperation, faster return to activity2-4, and a similar quality of life compared with arthroscopic repair5. More recent literature has suggested similar recurrence rates between arthroscopic and open procedures6. However, open Bankart repair may be indicated in cases of recurrent instability, especially if the patient participates in high-risk sports, because open repair can provide more capsular shift through the use of extra-capsular knots7. Performing a subscapularis split decreases the likelihood of subscapularis tendon avulsion following subscapularis tendon tenotomy and subsequent repair, as has been described in the literature8.

Description

Indications for open Bankart repair include failure of arthroscopic Bankart repair, multiple dislocations, with subcritical bone loss. This surgical technique is performed via the deltopectoral approach. The subscapularis tendon is exposed and "spared" by splitting the fibers with use of a longitudinal incision between the upper 2/3 and lower 1/3 of the subscapularis. We begin the split medially near the myotendinous junction. Because the subscapularis becomes increasingly difficult to separate from the capsule as it tracks laterally, a RAY-TEC sponge is utilized to bluntly dissect. A T-shaped laterally based capsulotomy is made to expose the glenohumeral joint. The vertical aspect is made first, followed by the horizontal aspect from lateral to medial, extending to the labrum. A Fukuda retractor is placed through the split to hold the humeral head laterally. The labrum is elevated, and the glenoid is prepared with rasp. Then labrum is repaired with knotted suture anchors until it is secure. One anchor is utilized for each "hour" of the clock face, with a minimum of 3 anchors. The anchors are placed on the articular margin of the glenoid. Sutures are passed from the anchor through the capsule and tied outside the capsule. The capsulotomy is then repaired with use of a suture. The suture is utilized to pull the inferior portion superiorly. The inferior portion is taken superiorly, and the superior leaflet is imbricated over the top. Finally, an examination is performed to ensure that the humeral head can be translated to but not over the anterior and posterior glenoid rims. No repair of the subscapularis tendon insertion is required. The incision is closed with deep dermal and subcuticular suture.

Alternatives

Nonoperative treatment options include rotator cuff and periscapular strengthening or immobilization. Operative treatment options include open Bankart repair with subscapularis tenotomy and repair, arthroscopic Bankart repair, or bone block augmentation procedures.

Rationale

This procedure is different from the alternative treatments in that it is an open procedure, which allows for a more robust repair because the capsule can be shifted and doubled over, leading to the described decreased recurrence and reoperation rates. Open Bankart repair is better suited for large lesions that would be difficult to repair via arthroscopy. This procedure differs from other open Bankart techniques because the subscapularis is split rather than tenotomized, which removes the need to repair the tendon and decreases the rate of avulsion of the subscapularis tendon repair. Finally, this procedure is less invasive than the Latarjet procedure because it does not require osseous osteotomies and fixation.

Expected Outcomes

This procedure provides adequate capsular shift and visualization of the Bankart lesion without the increased risk of postoperative subscapularis tendon injury.

Important Tips

If the subscapularis split alone does not provide adequate visualization, portions of the subscapularis tendon can be released from the lesser tuberosity.The location and origin of the upper and lower subscapular nerves can have variable courses, which could theoretically put them at risk for iatrogenic injury; however, studies have shown this subscapularis split technique to be safe from and prevent denervation of the muscle.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

GBL = glenoid bone lossEUA = examination under anesthesiaMRI = magnetic resonance imagingHSL = Hill-Sachs lesionAHCA = anterior humeral circumflex artery.

F, Meisterhans M, Borbas P, Wieser K, Grubhofer F. Anterior shoulder dislocation with avulsion fracture of the greater tuberosity results in reliable good outcomes after closed reduction

Background

Avulsion of the greater tuberosity (GT) due to traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (ASD) is a commonly observed fracture pattern. After closed reduction of the dislocated humerus, the GT typically reduces itself into its anatomic position enabling the patient to undergo conservative treatment. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review a consecutive series of patients with conservatively treated GT avulsion fractures after closed reduction of an ASD and analyze radiographic outcome, shoulder function and glenohumeral stability and the conversion rate to surgical treatment.

Methods

All patients who underwent closed reduction of a GT avulsion fracture after ASD with the primary intention of conservative treatment between 2017 and 2022 were included. Complications (i.e. conversion to surgical treatment), shoulder function assessed with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and subjective shoulder value, instability assessed with the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score, radiological impingement (greater tuberosity index = GTI and impingement index = II) and GT fracture pattern were assessed as outcome measurements.

Results

A total of 29 patients (mean age 44 years, 27% female) with a mean follow-up of 32.6 (range, 8-96) months were enrolled. Seven patients (24%) underwent surgery due to secondary displacement (n = 4, 14%) or impingement symptoms (n = 3, 10%). All patients who underwent secondary surgery showed a multifragmentary fracture pattern of the GT. Shoulder stiffness (n = 7) and neuropraxia of the axillary nerve (n = 3) were observed temporarily and resolved during the follow-up period. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and subjective shoulder value of the conservatively treated patients at the last follow-up was 89.2 ± 19.1 respectively 86 ± 18.2%. No recurrent glenohumeral dislocation was documented. The mean Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score at last follow-up was 8(0-71). The mean GTI decreased from 1.2 ± 0.1 after ASD to 1.1 ± 0.1 at the last follow-up (P = .002). The mean II decreased from 0.6 ± 0.5 after ASD to 0.4 ± 0.3 at the last follow-up (P = .110).

Conclusion

The GT avulsion fragment reduces typically into a close to anatomic position after closed reduction and the GTI even improves with further conservative treatment over time. Close radiological follow-up is necessary to rule out secondary displacement which occurs typically in a multifragmentary fracture pattern. Patients without the need for surgery showed good clinical outcomes without recurrence of glenohumeral instability.

Exploring temporal trends and burden of traumatic shoulder dislocation: a global perspective

Objective

To explore the geographical and temporal trends of traumatic shoulder dislocation, describe the association between the social and demographic factors and the health burden due to traumatic shoulder dislocation, and further investigate its causes.

Methods

Data on traumatic shoulder dislocation was collected from the Global Burden of Disease 2019, spanning the years 1990 to 2019. The epidemiology and disease burden were examined at global, regional, and national levels. Additionally, the age and gender patterns were analyzed, followed by an investigation into the primary causes. Lastly, the study studied the correlation between age-standardized rates and the socio-demographic index (SDI).

Results

Over a span of 30 years, both the crude and age-standardized rates of incidence and years lived with disability (YLDs) rates for all genders displayed a slight fluctuating downward trend. The incidence and YLDs rates in males were consistently higher than those in females. The study analyzed both incidence and YLDs rates of the global, regional, and national of traumatic shoulder dislocations from 1990 to 2019, as well as the temporal trends. Among males, the highest incidence rate was observed in young adulthood, while females exhibited the highest incidence rate in old age. This pattern was mirrored in the YLDs rate. Falls were identified as the main cause contributing to the disease burden related to traumatic shoulder dislocations. Moreover, a positive correlation was found between the age-standardized rates and SDI.

Conclusion

The disease burden of traumatic shoulder dislocation has not significantly decreased from 1990 to 2019. The incidence and YLD rates are associated with age, gender, and SDI. A thorough examination of the disease burden contributes to the efficient allocation and utilization of resources, as well as the development of targeted and effective intervention strategies.

Bulk osteochondral allograft for massive Hill-Sachs defect combined with Latarjet procedure for bipolar bone loss in anterior instability

A proportion of patients with anterior glenohumeral instability present with bipolar bone loss comprising large Hill-Sachs lesions and substantial glenoid defect. These are surgically difficult cases to treat. We describe a novel surgical procedure of bulk size-matched osteochondral allograft reconstruction for massive Hill-Sachs lesions combined with the Latarjet procedure for these challenging cases.

Fast treatment of anterior shoulder dislocations with two sedation-free methods: The Davos self-reduction method and Arlt method

Background

Various reduction techniques exist to treat traumatic shoulder dislocation, but best management remains unclear.

Aims

To investigate the reduction rate of traumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocations using two sedation-free techniques and success rates of subgroups.

Methods

A single-center study was performed analysing shoulder dislocations in a two-year period. Adult patients with anteroinferior shoulder dislocation were included. Two sedation-free reduction techniques were used: the Davos self-reduction technique and the Arlt-chair technique. Two attempts were performed before sedation. All patients gave informed consent to study participation.

Results

The investigated 106 patients (106 shoulder dislocations) had a mean age of 48 ± 18 years (74% male patients). The majority occurred during winter sports (76%). The overall success rate for both sedation-free reduction techniques was 82% (87 reduced shoulders, two attempts). A significantly increased success rate was found in patients without greater tuberosity fracture (86% without vs. 68% with fracture, p = 0.002) and for patients with repeated dislocation (93% vs. 80% for primary dislocation, p = 0.004). Time for reduction was 5 minutes (Davos technique) and 1 minute (Arlt-chair-technique). Associated injuries were mostly Hill Sachs lesions (78%). There was no major complication and no new-onset sensory deficit.

Conclusion

Davos and Arlt reduction techniques allowed sedation-free and fast treatment for anteroinferior shoulder dislocation during winter sports.

Neglected Superior Dislocation of the Shoulder Joint: A Case Report

The anterior subtype of shoulder dislocations constitutes the vast majority that either reduces instantly or is reduced at the point of care with no serious complexities. The posterior ones are infrequent and inferior and superior dislocations are even more rare. Rupture of the deltoid is considered to be linked with superior dislocation; regardless, very few articles are available pertaining to the mechanism of onset and the management of a superior shoulder dislocation. In the line of traumatic shoulder dislocations, we present a one-year-old neglected case of a 23-year-old male who sustained an open injury over the right outstretched upper arm, abducted at an angle of approximately 45° due to a fall from a height of approximately 18 feet. This unique report outlines the various surgical modalities available, given the patient's late presentation due to neglect.

Performance of the Fresno-Quebec Rule in identifying patients with concomitant fractures not requiring a radiograph before shoulder dislocation reduction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Although shoulder dislocation diagnosis is often solely based on clinical examination, physicians may order a radiograph to rule out a concomitant shoulder fracture before performing reduction. The Fresno-Québec decision rule aims to identify patients requiring a radiograph before reduction to avoid unnecessary systematic imaging. However, this novel approach needs further validation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of the Fresno-Québec rule in identifying patients who do not require a prereduction radiograph and assess the variables associated with a clinically significant fracture.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS

A multicenter, retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2021. Data were extracted from three ED university-affiliated tertiary-care centers. Patients aged ≥18 years with a final diagnosis of anterior glenohumeral dislocation were included.

OUTCOMES MEASURE AND ANALYSIS

Accuracy metrics [sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR)] of the Fresno-Québec rule were measured. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify variables associated with the presence of a concomitant clinically significant fracture.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 2129 patients were included, among whom 9.7% had a concomitant fracture. The performance metrics of the Fresno-Québec rule were as follows: Se 0.96 95% confidence interval (0.92-0.98), Sp 0.36 (0.34-0.38), PPV 0.14 (0.12-0.16), NPV 0.99 (0.98-0.99), PLR 1.49 (1.42-1.55) and NLR 0.12 (0.06-0.23). A total of 678 radiographs could have been avoided, corresponding to a reduction of 35.2%. Age ≥40 years, first dislocation episode [odds ratio (OR) = 3.18 (1.95-5.38); P  < 0.001], the following mechanisms: road collision [OR = 6.26 (2.65-16.1)], low-level fall [OR = 3.49 (1.66-8.28)], high-level fall [OR = 3.95 (1.62-10.4)], and seizure/electric shock [OR = 10.6 (4.09-29.2)] were associated with the presence of a concomitant fracture.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the Fresno-Québec rule has excellent Se in identifying concomitant clinically significant fractures in patients with an anterior glenohumeral dislocation. The use of this clinical decision rule may be associated with a reduction of approximately a third of unnecessary prereduction radiographs.

Arthroscopic capsular shift surgery in patients with atraumatic shoulder joint instability: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of arthroscopic capsular shift surgery on pain and functional impairment for people with atraumatic shoulder (glenohumeral) joint instability.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial in a specialist secondary care facility. Patients aged 18 years and over who reported insecurity (apprehension) in their shoulder joint and had evidence of capsulolabral damage on arthroscopic examination were included. Patients were excluded if their shoulder apprehension symptoms were precipitated by a high velocity shoulder injury, they had bony or neural damage, a rotator cuff or labral tear, or previous surgery on the symptomatic shoulder. Sixty-eight participants were randomised and received diagnostic arthroscopy, followed by arthroscopic capsular shift or diagnostic arthroscopy alone. All participants received the same postoperative clinical care. The primary outcome was pain and functional impairment measured with the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. The prespecified minimum clinically important effect was a reduction in pain and disability of 10.4 points.

RESULTS

Mean reductions in pain and functional impairment for both groups were similar. Compared with diagnostic arthroscopy, arthroscopic capsular shift increased pain and functional impairment by means of 5 points (95% CI -6 to 16 points) at 6 months, 1 point (95% CI -11 to 13 points) at 12 months and 2 points (95% CI -12 to 17 points) at 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with diagnostic arthroscopy alone, arthroscopic capsular shift confers, at best, only minimal clinically important benefit in the medium term.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01751490.

Anterior-posterior glenohumeral translation in shoulders with traumatic anterior instability: a systematic review of the literature

Background

Reports of glenohumeral translation in shoulders with traumatic anterior instability have been presented. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate anterior-posterior translation in shoulders with traumatic anterior instability.

Methods

This systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies including patients aged ≥15 years with previous traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation or subluxation were included. The outcome was anterior-posterior glenohumeral translation. A search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library was performed on July 17, 2022. Two reviewers individually screened titles and abstracts, reviewed full text, extracted data, and performed quality assessment.

Results

Twenty studies (582 unstable shoulders in total) of varying quality were included. There was a lack of standardization and unity across studies. Radiography, ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, motion tracking, instrumentation, and manual testing were used to assess the glenohumeral translation. The glenohumeral translation in unstable shoulders ranged from 0.0 ± 0.8 mm to 11.6 ± 3.7 mm, as measured during various motion tasks, arm positions, and application of external force. The glenohumeral translation was larger or more anteriorly directed in unstable shoulders than in stable when contralateral healthy shoulders or a healthy control group were included in the studies. Several studies found that the humeral head was more anteriorly located on the glenoid in the unstable shoulders.

Conclusion

This systematic review provides an overview of the current literature on glenohumeral translation in traumatic anterior shoulder instability. It was not able to identify a threshold for abnormal translation in unstable shoulders, due to the heterogeneity of data. The review supports that not only the range of translation but also the direction hereof as well as the location of the humeral head on the glenoid seem to be part of the pathophysiology. Technical development and increased attention to research methodology in recent years may provide more knowledge and clarity on this topic in the future.

Diagnosis of Posterior and Combined-Type Shoulder Instability: A 10-Year Cross-sectional Study From a Single Military Base

Background

Large variations exist in the reported frequency and etiology of posterior and combined shoulder instability in the active-duty military population.

Purpose

To compare imaging and clinical examination findings as well as reoperation rates between active-duty military patients who underwent surgery for anterior, posterior, and combined-type shoulder instability.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on patients treated surgically for shoulder instability from a single military base from January 2010 to December 2019. Each case was characterized as isolated anterior, isolated posterior, or combined, according to arthroscopic findings. Information was collected on patient characteristics, history of trauma, time to surgery, associated pathological findings, and survivorship at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Results

Overall, 416 patients (n = 394 men; n = 22 women), with a mean age of 29.1 years, underwent primary shoulder stabilization surgery during the study period. There were 158 patients (38%) with isolated anterior instability, 139 (33%) with isolated posterior instability, and 119 (29%) with combined instability. A history of trauma was more prevalent with isolated anterior instability (129 [81.7%]) than with either isolated posterior (95 [68.4%]) or combined instability (73 [61.3%]) (P = .047 and P = .001, respectively). Patients with anterior instability were significantly more likely to be diagnosed on the preoperative physical examination when compared with patients with posterior instability (93% vs 79.1%; P < .001) or combined instability (93% vs 75.6%; P < .001) and were also more likely to have a discrete labral tear detected on a preoperative magnetic resonance arthrogram than patients with posterior instability (82.9% vs 63.3%; P < .001). There was no significant difference in the rate of medical discharge or recurrent instability requiring reoperation between groups.

Conclusion

The study findings indicated that young, active-duty military patients are at increased risk for isolated posterior and combined-type shoulder instability, with posterior and combined instability collectively accounting for over 60% of instability cases in this cohort. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of instability when evaluating and treating young, active-duty military patients with shoulder pain, even in the absence of diagnostic physical examinations or imaging findings.

A Systematic Review With Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Closed Reduction Methods for Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To review closed reduction methods for anterior shoulder dislocation and perform the first comprehensive comparison of the individual methods in terms of success rate, pain, and reduction time.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials registered until December 31, 2020. We performed a pairwise and network meta-analysis using a Bayesian random-effects model. Two authors independently performed screening and risk-of-bias assessment.

RESULTS

We found 14 studies with 1,189 patients. In a pairwise meta-analysis, no significant difference was found in the only comparable pair, namely, the Kocher method versus the Hippocratic method (success rate: odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53, 2.75: pain during reduction [visual analog scale]: standard mean difference, -0.33; 95% CI, -0.69, 0.02; reduction time [minutes]: mean difference, 0.19, 95% CI, -1.77, 2.15). In network meta-analysis, FARES (Fast, Reliable, and Safe) was the only method significantly less painful than the Kocher method (mean difference, -4.0; 95% credible interval, -7.6, -0.40). In the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) plot of success rate, FARES, and the Boss-Holzach-Matter/Davos method showed high values. For pain during reduction, FARES had the highest SUCRA value in the overall analysis. In the SUCRA plot of reduction time, modified external rotation and FARES had high values. The only complication was 1 case of fracture with the Kocher method.

CONCLUSION

Overall, Boss-Holzach-Matter/Davos, and FARES demonstrated the most favorable value for success rates, whereas both FARES and modified external rotation were more favorable in reduction times. FARES had the most favorable SUCRA for pain during reduction. Future work directly comparing techniques is needed to better understand the difference in reduction success and complications.

"Champagne Fracture": A Superior Fracture-Dislocation of the Proximal Humerus: A Case Report

A 79-year-old right-handed woman presented with an indirect trauma to her left shoulder after a fall down the stairs. X-rays and computed tomography showed a four-part glenohumeral fracture-dislocation with a subcutaneous ectopic location of the humeral head in the retroclavicular space. A reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was performed using a deltopectoral approach with direct superior extraction of the humeral head. The result at 2 years was a subjective shoulder value of 80%, an absolute Constant score of 59, and a relative Constant score of 92/100. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description in the literature of such a lesion of superior glenohumeral fracture-dislocation and its treatment.

Management of Shoulder Instability in Patients with Underlying Hyperlaxity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Shoulder instability in patients with underlying joint hyperlaxity can be challenging to treat. Poorly defined terminology, heterogeneous treatments, and sparse reports on clinical outcomes impair the development of best practices in this patient population. This article provides a review of the current literature regarding optimal management of patients suffering from shoulder instability with concomitant hyperlaxity of the shoulder, from isolated shoulder joint hyperlaxity to congenital hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Current research shows specialized physiotherapy protocols focused on strengthening of periscapular muscles and improvement of sensorimotor control are a promising non-surgical therapeutic avenue in certain patients, which can be augmented by device-based intervention in select cases. If surgical treatment is warranted, arthroscopic techniques such as pancapsular shift or plication continue to demonstrate favorable outcomes and are currently considered the benchmark for success. The long-term success of more recent innovations such as coracoid process transfers, conjoint tendon transfers, subscapularis tendon augmentation, and capsular reconstruction remains unproven. For patients affected by connective tissue disorders, treatment success is generally less predictable, and the entire array of non-operative and operative interventions needs to be considered to achieve the best patient-specific treatment results. In the treatment of shoulder instability and concomitant hyperlaxity, specialized physiotherapy protocols augmented by device-based interventions have emerged as powerful, non-operative treatment options for select patients. Successful surgical approaches have been demonstrated to comprehensively address capsular redundancy, labral lesions, and incompetence of additional passive stabilizers in a patient-specific fashion, respective of the underlying connective tissue constitution.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair: how many knotless anchors do we need for anatomic reconstruction of the shoulder?-a prospective randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

The optimal strategy for surgical repair of traumatic anterior shoulder instability remains controversial. While several study groups have reported that the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic procedures performed with two anchors are not fully adequate, these conclusions are not supported by the findings published in other studies. A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare the structural and clinical outcomes of surgical procedures involving two vs. three anchors.

METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair were randomly assigned to either Group I, which underwent procedures involving two double-loaded 3.5-mm knotless anchors, or Group II, which underwent procedures involving three single-loaded 2.9-mm knotless anchors. All patients underwent bilateral MRI assessments at a minimum of 12 months and clinical assessment at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively. To evaluate the reconstruction of the labral capsular ligamentous complex (LCLC), the labrum-glenoid height index (LGHI), restored labral height (LH), and labral slope (LS) were measured for both shoulders. For clinical assessment, the redislocation rate and functional outcome scores (Constant score (CS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score (ASES), Walch Duplay score (WDS), and Rowe score (RS)) were evaluated at follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Bankart repair with two knotless anchors showed lower values for anterior reconstruction of the LCLC compared to the uninjured contralateral shoulder. Likewise, significant differences were noted when comparing these measurements to those from patients who underwent reconstruction with three anchors. No differences were demonstrated with regard to the reconstruction of the inferior LCLC. Clinical assessment showed good to excellent results in both groups. In total, three patients experienced redislocation of the shoulder: two in group I and one in group II. No significant differences were found with respect to clinical outcomes and redislocation rates.

CONCLUSION

Bankart repair with both two and three knotless anchors results in effective anatomical reconstruction of the labral capsular ligamentous complex. Although the two-anchor technique yields significantly lower values for the anterior portion compared with the contralateral side, none of these differences reach clinical relevance as per our original definition.

Arthroscopic Repair Versus Conservative Treatment for First-time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

To systematically compare the clinical efficacy of conservative treatment and arthroscopic one-stage repair for patients with first-time anterior dislocation of the shoulder. A retrieval and systematic review of randomized controlled studies of primary anterior shoulder dislocation with conservative versus arthroscopic repair was conducted and further pooled analysis was performed to compare the overall difference in clinical outcomes, including redislocation and revision surgery rates, shoulder function scores and related complications. Preliminary meta-analysis showed that the risk of anterior shoulder redislocation was 4.73-fold higher in patients treated conservatively than those undergoing arthroscopic repair (RR:4.73 [2.95-7.58], p<0.000; I²=0%, p=0.920),and that the revision surgery rate was 5.91 times higher in the conservative group than in the arthroscopic repair group (RR:5.91 [2.82-12.39], p<0.000; I²⁼0%, p=0.560).Early arthroscopic repair can significantly reduce the redislocation and revision surgery rates and also improve the shoulder joint function score, without serious complications. However, it is necessary to recognize the subset of patients with a higher risk of redislocation in young patients through a high quality, blinded, prospective cohort study when early arthroscopic repair intervention in this subset of high-risk patients will be of significant clinical value.

The effect of shoulder muscle succinylcholine injection on the foreleg raising power: Sion's local paralysis

Objective

We examined the change in foreleg raising power after Sion's local paralysis (SLP) with succinylcholine in the shoulder muscle.

Methods

A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, porcine study was designed and performed at a research institution. Ten male Korean native pigs were randomized into an intervention group (n = 5) and a control group (n = 5). The injection points were in the middle of the left trapezius muscle and the middle of the left deltoid muscle. The control group received 2 ml normal saline (NS), 1 ml injected in each point. The intervention group received 0.4 mg/kg succinylcholine diluted to 2 ml in NS, and 1 ml was injected in each point. To represent the foreleg raising power, the height of the left forelegs from baseline (experiment table) was measured. We measured the foreleg height and oxygen saturation at -4, -2, 0, +2, +4, +6, +8, +10, +20, +30, and +60 min.

Results

After SLP, foreleg height immediately declined in the intervention group. It recovered slightly for a few minutes and declined from 4 to 8 min. In the control group, foreleg height was relatively similar throughout the study period. A repeated-measure analysis of variance revealed a significant group × time interaction (F_10,80 = 2.37, P = 0.017), a significant main effect for group (F_1,8 = 6.25, P = 0.037), and a significant main effect for time (F_10,80 = 4.41, P < 0.001). Post hoc analysis demonstrated that the intervention group showed significantly less foreleg raising power than the control group at 0, 4, 6, 8, 20, and 30 min (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with the control group, the foreleg raising power in the intervention group immediately decreased significantly and persisted for a period after SLP, without hypoxia, in a pig model.

Is lesser tuberosity morphology related to subscapularis tears and anterior shoulder instability?

PURPOSE

Although the morphological relationship of the scapula and the humeral head has been claimed to be related to shoulder pathologies, few studies examined the relationship between subscapularis (Ssc) tears and lesser tuberosity (LT)-humeral head (HH) and between Ssc tears and HH-glenoid. This study aims to evaluate the relationship of LT with HH and glenoid in patients with Ssc tears and anterior shoulder instability (ASI). We hypothesized that the glenoid, HH, and their combined relationship with LT may impact Ssc tears and ASI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 34 patients with ASI, 28 patients with isolated Ssc tears, and 40 patients as the control group. The radius of HH (Hr), the distance between the center of HH and LT (LTr), and the glenoid radius (Gr) were measured in shoulder magnetic resonance (MR) images. The LTr to Hr (LTr/Hr) ratio was defined as the lesser tuberosity-humeral head index (LTHHI), whereas the LTr to Gr (LTr/Gr) ratio was defined as the lesser tuberosity-glenoid index (LTGI). The three groups were compared regarding LTHHI, LTGI, LTr, Hr, and Gr.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between each group concerning LTGI (p < 0.001). LTGI values below 1.99 showed 93.1% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity for Ssc tears, while values above 2.24 showed 86.7% sensitivity and 86.2% specificity for ASI. Also, there was a significant difference when the groups were compared for LTHHI (p < 0.001). This rate was lowest for Ssc tears, and LTHHI values below 1.17 showed 82.8% sensitivity and 80.1% specificity.

CONCLUSION

LTGI may be a new predictive factor showing 93.1% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity for Ssc tears and 86.7% sensitivity and 86.2% specificity for ASI. In addition, LTHHI may be a new predictive factor showing 82.8% sensitivity and 80.1% specificity for Ssc tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III retrospective comparative study.

Treatment and outcomes of chronic locked posterior shoulder dislocations: a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Posterior shoulder dislocations are rare injuries that are often missed on initial presentation. Cases left untreated for more than three weeks are considered chronic, cannot be reduced closely (they become locked) and are usually associated with a significant reverse Hill-Sachs defect. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of chronic locked posterior shoulder dislocations treated with the McLaughlin procedure (classic or modified).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 12 patients with chronic locked posterior shoulder dislocation operated on between 2000 and 2021 by two surgeons in two institutions. Patients received a thorough clinical examination and radiological assessment before and after surgery. Shoulders were repaired with the McLaughlin or modified McLaughlin procedure. Outcomes were assessed by comparing pre- and postoperative values of clinical variables.

RESULTS

Most of the dislocations were of traumatic origin. The average delay between dislocation and surgical reduction was 13.5 ± 9.7 weeks. Postoperative clinical outcomes were favourable, with an average subjective shoulder value of 86.4 ± 11.1 and a normalized Constant -Murley score of 90 ± 8.3. None of the patients had a recurrence of shoulder dislocation, but one patient developed avascular necrosis of the humeral head and two patients developed glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this group of patients with chronic locked posterior shoulder dislocation, the clinical outcomes of McLaughlin and modified McLaughlin procedures were satisfactory, even when surgery was significantly delayed.

Patterns of Nerve Injury and Recovery Rates of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Lesions Following Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

PURPOSE

We reviewed our cases of infraclavicular brachial plexus injuries associated with anterior shoulder dislocation to determine patterns of injury, recovery rates, and factors associated with a poor motor outcome.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who had sustained a concomitant nerve injury following dislocation of the glenohumeral joint treated with closed manipulation. The data collected included patient demographics, injury factors, and patterns of neurological deficits. The Medical Research Council (MRC) grade for motor power was the primary outcome measure, where a grade of 4 or 5 was regarded as achieving good motor recovery. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify factors associated with persistent motor weakness (MRC grades 0-3) at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2019, 61 patients were assessed. There were 36 males and 25 females, with a median age of 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 53-73 years). Four patterns of injury were identified: (1) isolated axillary nerve lesions; (2) single cord lesions; (3) combined lesions involving the medial and posterior cords; and (4) diffuse lesions affecting all 3 cords. Of 28 patients with isolated axillary nerve injuries, 22 recovered. All lateral cord injuries (11/11) and 20 of 24 posterior cord injuries recovered spontaneously. Recovery of hand intrinsic function from medial cord injuries had the worst outcome, with 14 of 27 patients not recovering beyond MRC grades 0 to 3. The median duration of dislocation before reduction was 6 hours (IQR, 3-12 hours). A multivariate analysis showed an association between the duration of shoulder dislocation and the likelihood of persistent motor weakness.

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder dislocations with motor deficits should be regarded as orthopedic emergencies and reduced expediently. Persistent motor weakness may be associated with a prolonged duration of dislocation prior to glenohumeral relocation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

The association between number of shoulder diagnoses and positive clinical tests with self-reported function and pain: A cross-sectional study of patients with hypermobile joints and shoulder complaints

BACKGROUND

Patients with hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD) and shoulder complaints may suffer from symptoms related to shoulder instability, laxity, and hypermobility. It is currently unknown whether having a more complex clinical status with several diagnoses (i.e., anterior instability (AI), multidirectional instability (MDI), and/or symptomatic localised shoulder hypermobility (LSH), relates to higher functional impairments and pain.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the associations between either ≤1, 2, or 3 clinical shoulder diagnoses (AI, MDI, and LSH) or the number (0-10) of positive clinical shoulder tests with shoulder function using the western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI, 0-2100, 0 = best) and pain intensity using numerical pain rating scale (NPRS, 0-10, 10 = worse).

DESIGN

Exploratory cross-sectional study.

METHOD

From a randomised controlled trial, baseline data from 100 participants with HSD and shoulder complaints for at least three months were included. Associations were investigated using linear regression models, adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and hand dominance.

RESULTS

Compared with having ≤1 diagnosis, neither participants with two (WOSI 76.9, 95% CI -136.3, 290.0; NPRS 0.3, 95% CI -0.9, 1.5) nor three (WOSI 35.5, 95% CI -178.5, 249.6; NPRS 0.1, 95% CI -1.1, 1.3) clinical shoulder diagnoses had significantly worse shoulder function or pain. Likewise, the number of positive clinical shoulder tests was not associated with function (WOSI -20.8 95%CI (-55.3, 13.7)) or pain (NPRS -0.1 95%CI (-0.2, 0.1)).

CONCLUSIONS

In participants with HSD and shoulder complaints, having more additional shoulder diagnoses or increased number of positive shoulder tests were not related to functional impairments or pain intensities.

Epidemiology of primary shoulder dislocations requiring surgery: A cohort study from a major trauma center during 7 years

PURPOSE

The epidemiology of shoulder instability in the general population is lacking. The aim of the current study was to determine the incidence rate of primary shoulder dislocations requiring surgical interventions in a major trauma center within a large maintenance organization.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of electronic health records database from 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2020 was conducted in major rural trauma center. This study included all patients aged 10 years or older with a primary shoulder dislocation that were treated with closed reduction in the emergency room department. An overall incidence density rates (IDR) (per 100,000 person-years) of primary shoulder dislocations and stabilization surgeries were determined for the entire cohort. The data was used to evaluate the age-specific and gender-specific epidemiology.

RESULTS

During the study period of 7 years there were 1,302 patients who underwent closed reduction after a primary shoulder dislocation (mean age 45 years). Of those, a total of 106 shoulder stabilization surgeries (8%) were performed. The IDR of primary shoulder dislocations was 179 per 100,000 person-years. The IDR of primary shoulder stabilizations was 15 per 100,000 person-years. The peak in number of dislocations was observed in the age groups of 20-29 years and over 60 years. In the age groups under 59 years dislocations were more common in men while in ages over 60 years dislocations were more common in women. The vast majority of shoulder stabilization surgeries were performed in young patients (age under 39 years).

CONCLUSION

The IDR of primary shoulder dislocations calculated from a major trauma center of the largest health maintenance organization in Israel was 179 per 100,000 person-years. Shoulder dislocations had bimodal age distribution. Overall, eight percent of the patients (mainly young) with shoulder dislocations underwent shoulder stabilization surgery during the study period.

The incidence of musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather epidemiological information on selected musculoskeletal injuries and to provide pooled injury-specific incidence rates.

Methods

PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and Scopus (Elsevier) databases were searched. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported incidence rate (or count with population at risk), contained data on adult population, and were written in English language. The number of cases and population at risk were collected, and the pooled incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using either a fixed or random effects model.

Results

The screening of titles yielded 206 articles eligible for inclusion in the study. Of these, 173 (84%) articles provided sufficient information to be included in the pooled incidence rates. Incidences of fractures were investigated in 154 studies, and the most common fractures in the whole adult population based on the pooled incidence rates were distal radius fractures (212.0, 95% CI 178.1 to 252.4 per 100,000 person-years), finger fractures (117.1, 95% CI 105.3 to 130.2 per 100,000 person-years), and hip fractures (112.9, 95% CI 82.2 to 154.9 per 100,000 person-years). The most common sprains and dislocations were ankle sprains (429.4, 95% CI 243.0 to 759.0 per 100,000 person-years) and first-time patellar dislocations (32.8, 95% CI 21.6 to 49.7 per 100,000 person-years). The most common injuries were anterior cruciate ligament (17.5, 95% CI 6.0 to 50.2 per 100,000 person-years) and Achilles (13.7, 95% CI 9.6 to 19.5 per 100,000 person-years) ruptures.

Conclusion

The presented pooled incidence estimates serve as important references in assessing the global economic and social burden of musculoskeletal injuries. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(11):814–825.

Risk for recurrent instability and reoperation following arthroscopic and open shoulder stabilization in a large cross-sectional population

Background

Recurrent shoulder instability is an orthopedic problem with potentially long-term functional ramifications. Although arthroscopic stabilization has become increasingly utilized over open stabilization, optimal surgical intervention to minimize recurrent instability remains controversial.

Methods

The PearlDiver Mariner database was queried for all cases of open and arthroscopic shoulder stabilization from 2010 to 2019. Utilization trends were aggregated after identifying cohorts of 107,210 and 13,217 patients who respectively underwent arthroscopic or open stabilization using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Subsets from those cohorts with laterality-specific International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for shoulder instability were used to evaluate 2-year rates of recurrent instability (presence of shoulder dislocation or revision open or arthroscopic stabilization). Linear regression and chi-squared analysis were used to analyze utilization trends and to compare recurrent instability.

Results

Arthroscopic stabilization comprised 90% of all stabilization procedures with annual utilization continuing to increase into 2019. Latarjet utilization increased from 15% to 42% of all open stabilization procedures while open Bankart repair utilization decreased from 56% to 35%. The rate of recurrent instability was 10.2% after arthroscopic stabilization and 12.3% after open stabilization (P = .01). Rates of redislocation (4.0% vs. 2.6%, P < .01), conversion to shoulder arthroplasty (1.2% vs. 0.4%, P < .01), and revision open stabilization (6.8% vs. 2.3%, P < .01) after index open stabilization were significantly higher than after index arthroscopic stabilization. There was no difference in revision stabilization or dislocation rates between open procedures.

Conclusion

Despite increasing utilization of coracoid transfer, arthroscopic stabilization is still the dominant modality used for surgical treatment of shoulder instability and in our analysis, showed lower 2-year rates of dislocation, revision open stabilization, and conversion to shoulder arthroplasty.

Short- and long-term outcomes in Bankart repair vs. conservative treatment for first-time anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

First-time anterior shoulder dislocations are associated with a high rate of residual instability. Therefore, many surgeons support initial Bankart repair surgery over conservative management to address this issue. However, the optimal treatment remains controversial because of uncertainty regarding long-term surgical outcomes. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the short- and long-term rates of residual instability following Bankart repair or conservative management after a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, and ScienceDirect databases were accessed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Bankart repair to conservative management. RoB (Risk of Bias) 2 was used to check study quality. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines were followed in assessing primary outcomes. The inverse-variance method for continuous variables and the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables was used.

RESULTS

A total of 348 patients from 6 RCTs published across 8 articles, with a mean age of 23.7 years, were included. Bias was graded low in 3 studies, some concerns in 3 studies, and high in 2 studies. In the short term (2-3 years), surgery lowered recurrent instability (risk ratio [RR] 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08, 0.27; I² = 0%; P < .0001). Similar findings were seen in the long term (5-12 years) (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.14, 0.39; I² = 0%; P < .0001). No difference was observed in return to sport (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.91, 1.52; I² = 78%; P = .21). Initial surgery lowered subsequent stabilization surgery in the short (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.09, 0.43; I² = 0%; P < .0001) and long term (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07, 0.39; I² = 25%; P < .0001). Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) scores did not differ in the short term (MD, 2.54, 95% CI -0.51, 5.59; I² = 48%; P = .1) but were higher in the surgical group at long-term follow-up. Patient satisfaction was also higher with surgery (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.4, 2.2; I² = 88%; P < .0001). Certainty of evidence was low for only 1 long-term outcome measure.

CONCLUSION

Bankart repair surgery for first-time anterior shoulder dislocation results in a large reduction in the risk of recurrent shoulder instability and subsequent stabilization surgery in both short- (2-3 years) and long-term (5-12 years) follow-up intervals. Additionally, slight improvements in overall patient satisfaction and WOSI score can be seen at long-term follow-up. However, surgical intervention failed to significantly improve the rate of return to sport when compared with conservative management.

Han's technique: a new reduction technique for acute anterior shoulder dislocation

INTRODUCTION

Acute anterior shoulder dislocation (AASD) is the most common joint dislocation. Here, we introduced a new reduction technique for AASD, named "Han's technique" (or "Touch overhead technique").

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with AASD were treated with "Han's technique" in the orthopaedic department of our hospital from October 2018 to November 2020. An orthopedic surgeon performed the reduction maneuver without any anesthesia or sedation throughout the reduction process. The fundamental information and related data were recorded, including patients' age, sex, dislocation side, previous dislocations history, reduction time, number of attempts at reduction, success rate of the reduction, intensity of pain during reduction using the 10-point visual analogue scale score (VAS), any complications, with or without the fracture and neurovascular examination results.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients with AASD were involved in our study. Thirty-nine cases (95%) were primary dislocation. Eleven patients (27%) were complicated with large tubercle fracture and one patient (2%) complicated with inferior glenoid fractures. All patients were successfully reduced by Han's technique with mean reduction time was 138 s. The pain score during the reduction operation is only1.83 ± 0.83 points. No neurovascular injury or iatrogenic fracture was found after reduction in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Han's technique (or Touch overhead technique) is a simple, safe, effective, mild and easy to master which can be operated by one surgeon without anesthesia or sedation for AASD.

High Incidence of Combined and Posterior Labral Tears in Military Patients With Operative Shoulder Instability

BACKGROUND

Anterior shoulder instability is the pattern most commonly reported in the civilian population, but military servicemembers may represent a unique population. At 1.7 per 1000 person-years, servicemembers not only have a higher incidence of instability events compared with civilians (reported rate of 0.2-0.8), but the distribution of labral tears in the military may differ significantly as well.

HYPOTHESIS

The incidence of combined and posterior labral tears in the military population will be greater than numbers previously reported.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The Wounded, Ill, and Injured Registry, a Department of Defense patient reported outcomes data collection platform that includes all military branches, was queried retrospectively for all patients who had undergone a primary arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilization procedure (Current Procedural Terminology codes 29806, 23455, 23462) between October 2016 and January 2019. Demographic information was obtained through intake forms completed by patients at the time of enrollment into the Military Orthopaedics Tracking Injuries and Outcomes Network. Tear location was determined arthroscopically and labeled as anterior, inferior, posterior, superior, or any combination thereof. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the percentage of patients with isolated anterior, isolated posterior, isolated inferior, or combined labral tears in the current study cohort with those in a previously reported cohort of patients with operative shoulder instability at a single military treatment facility.

RESULTS

A total of 311 patients were included who had undergone primary shoulder stabilization during the study period. Of these patients, 94 (30.2%) had isolated anterior tears, 76 (24.4%) had isolated posterior tears, and 136 (43.7%) had combined tears. We observed a higher percentage of combined tears in our data set than in a data set from a single military treatment facility (χ²(2) = 48.2; P < .00001). Chi-square analysis demonstrated that significantly more female patients had an isolated anterior labral tear (51.2%) compared with male patients (27.1%; χ²(2) = 9.4; P = .009).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of combined and posterior labral tears in the military population is greater than numbers previously reported in both military and civilian populations.

Analysis of Athletes Who Did Not Return to Play After Open Latarjet

Background:

The Latarjet procedure is indicated in patients with risk factors for postoperative recurrence, including collision and competitive athletes. However, the factors that prevent athletes from being able return to play (RTP) after the open Latarjet procedure are still unclear and have not been fully elucidated in the literature.

Purpose:

To evaluate patient-reported outcomes and psychological and psychosocial factors associated with athletes who did not RTP after the open Latarjet procedure compared with patients who did RTP.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective review of athletes who underwent the open Latarjet procedure and subsequently did not RTP after a minimum of 12 months. These patients were pair matched in a 2:1 ratio for age, sex, sport, and level of preoperative play with a control group who returned to play. Patients were evaluated for their psychological readiness to return to sport using the Shoulder Instability–Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI); other measures included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). Multivariate regression models were used to evaluate factors affecting RTP.

Results:

Included were 35 patients in the no-RTP group and 70 patients in the RTP group. In the no-RTP group, 7 patients (20%) passed the SIRSI benchmark of 56, with a mean overall score of 41.5 ± 21.9; in the RTP group, 57 patients (81.4%) passed the SIRSI benchmark, with a mean overall score of 74.5 ± 19.8 (P < .0001 for both). Patients in the RTP group had better SSV (88.0 vs 75.7; P <.0001) and VAS pain (1.7 vs 2.9; P = .0046) scores. Of the athletes who did not return, 18 felt persistent pain/apprehension and 17 felt that it was a natural end to their career or that their lifestyle had changed. Multiple logistic regression revealed that thoughts of having to go through surgery and rehabilitation again was significantly associated with lower RTP (P < .05).

Conclusion:

Patients who did not RTP after open Latarjet exhibited poor psychological readiness to RTP and worse pain VAS and SSV scores compared with patients who did RTP.

Nonoperative management of anterior shoulder instability can result in high rates of recurrent instability and pain at long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Data on the long-term outcomes of nonoperative treatment of anterior shoulder instability are lacking, particularly for the US population. The purpose was to (1) describe the characteristics of patients with anterior shoulder instability treated nonoperatively, (2) assess the long-term outcomes of nonoperative management in a US population, and (3) identify risk factors for poor outcomes following nonoperative management.

METHODS

A geographic cohort of >500,000 subjects was used to identify patients treated nonoperatively for anterior shoulder instability. Only patients aged <40 years at the time of initial instability with minimum 10-year follow-up were included. Medical records were reviewed to obtain demographic characteristics, physical examination findings, clinical history data, imaging results, treatment details, and clinical and/or radiographic progression. Recurrent pain, recurrent instability, and the development of symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) were the primary outcomes evaluated.

RESULTS

The study included 254 patients (73% male) with a median age of 19 years (range, 16-26 years) at the time of initial instability. At median 17-year follow-up, 37.5% experienced recurrent instability, 58.4% had recurrent pain, and 12.2% had symptomatic OA development. Factors associated with recurrent pain at final follow-up were multiple instability events prior to presentation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.43; P < .01) and increased pain at the initial visit (HRs of 0.79 for mild, 1.74 for moderate, and 1.39 for severe; P < .01); patients with multiple instability events prior to presentation also had an increased risk of recurrence (P < .01). Factors increasing the risk of the development of symptomatic OA included increased pain at the initial visit (P = .05), seizure disorder (HR, 27.01; P < .01), and smoking (HR, 5.15; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

At long-term follow-up of 17 years, a high rate of poor outcomes was observed following nonoperative management of anterior shoulder instability. Overall, 37.5% of patients experienced recurrent shoulder instability, 58.4% had recurrent shoulder pain, and 12.2% had symptomatic OA development. Risk factors associated with adverse clinical outcomes included increased pain at the initial visit, recurrent instability prior to presentation, seizure disorder, and smoking.

CT estimation of glenoid bone loss in anterior glenohumeral instability

Aims

Recurrent dislocation is both a cause and consequence of glenoid bone loss, and the extent of the bony defect is an indicator guiding operative intervention. Literature suggests that loss greater than 25% requires glenoid reconstruction. Measuring bone loss is controversial; studies use different methods to determine this, with no clear evidence of reproducibility. A systematic review was performed to identify existing CT-based methods of quantifying glenoid bone loss and establish their reliability and reproducibility

Methods

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review of conventional and grey literature was performed.

Results

A total of 25 studies were initially eligible. Following screening, nine papers were included for review. Main themes identified compared 2D and 3D imaging, as well as linear- compared with area-based techniques. Heterogenous data were acquired, and therefore no meta-analysis was performed.

Conclusion

No ideal CT-based method is demonstrated in the current literature, however evidence suggests that surface area methods are more reproducible and lead to fewer over-estimations of bone loss, provided the views used are standardized. A prospective imaging trial is required to provide a more definitive answer to this research question. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(2):114–122.

Mid-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and remplissage for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in patients with a history of seizures

Background

Seizure predisposes patients to shoulder dislocation. However, there is no consensus regarding the best management approach for recurrent shoulder dislocation in patients who have a history of seizures. In this study, we report the outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair augmented by Remplissage for the recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation in a series of patients with a history of seizures.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 27 patients with 29 recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations who were treated with the arthroscopic Bankart repair were included. All cases had deep Hill-Sachs lesions according to Hardy classification that was managed with a Remplissage technique. Patients with a glenoid defect of more than 20% in the CT scan were excluded. Twenty-two patients had an epileptic seizure, while the remaining five patients had convulsions due to other causes. The mean age of the patients was 28.3 ± 6.2 years. The mean follow-up of the patients was 3.1 ± 1.2 years. Outcome measures included the shoulder range of motion that was compared with the non-injured side in the unilateral subjects and the shoulder function that was evaluated by the Rowe score and the Walch-Duplay score.

Results

The mean forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation were not significantly different between injured and non-injured shoulder (p = 0.34, p = 0.41, p = 0.11, p = 0.23). The mean Rowe score was 49.1 ± 7.8 before the surgery and 92.1 ± 6.4 at the last visit (p < 0.001). According to the Walch-Duplay score, the shoulders were categorized as excellent, good, and fair in 17 (58.7%), 11 (37.9%), and 1 (3.4%) shoulder, respectively. The overall rate of instability recurrence was 17.2% (n = 5).

Conclusion

In patients with a history of seizures, arthroscopic Bankart repair augmented by Remplissage could be regarded as a safe and efficient method for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with glenoid defect < 20%.

Evaluation of Davos self-assisted technique for reduction of anterior glenohumeral dislocations: a comparative study with traction/counter-traction technique

Background

Few studies have compared conventional and self-assisted shoulder reduction maneuvers. The goal of this study was to evaluate the results of self-assisted Davos vs. traction/countertraction (T/Ct) techniques in the treatment of acute anterior shoulder dislocations.

Methods

This was a single-center, prospective study carried out at a tertiary hospital emergency department. Patients aged 18-69 years old, with radiographic confirmation of anterior glenohumeral dislocations, were consecutively allocated to treatment groups. Recorded data included pain at admission (visual analog scale [VAS] score at admission), analgesia before reduction, maximum pain during reduction (maximum VAS score), demographic characteristics, lesion mechanism, laterality, prior dislocation, and immediate complications. The primary outcomes were reduction success rate and pain.

Results

Eighty individuals were included (40/group). Regarding the success rate, no statistically significant differences were found between Davos or T/Ct (87.5% vs. 85%; P = .058). The maximum VAS score was significantly lower in Davos than that in T/Ct (4.18 ± 2.00 vs. 6.30 ± 2.13; P < .001). The effect of analgesia in the maximum VAS score was more evident among Davos patients, with significantly lower pain in the subgroup who were provided analgesia (3.63 ± 2.02 vs. 5.31 ± 2.01; P = .01).

Discussion

Davos was as effective as T/Ct for reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations (highest reported success rate: 87.5%) and conditioned a less traumatic experience, with significantly lower pain during reduction (the maximum VAS score was more than 2 points lower in the Davos group; P < .001). Analgesia had a synergistic effect among patients submitted to the Davos technique, suggesting that T/Ct is inherently more painful.

Conclusion

The Davos is a patient-controlled, atraumatic, and safe technique, allowing successful, gentle, and less painful glenohumeral reduction. These findings favor Davos as an easy-to-teach and effective first-line treatment for first-time and recurrent shoulder dislocations.

Differences in Patients' and Surgeons' Expectations before Shoulder Stabilization Surgery

Purpose: The primary goal of shoulder stabilization procedures is to re-establish stability and many surgeons measure the success after shoulder stabilization surgery only by the absence of re-dislocation. However, patients might also suffer from pain, loss of range of motion and strength as well as anxiety and stigmatization and therefore have other expectations from a stabilization surgery than just a stable shoulder. Purpose of this study was to analyze if surgeons know what their patients typically expect from a shoulder stabilization surgery. Furthermore, the aim was to analyze the influence of various factors on patients’ expectations. Materials and Methods: 204 patients with a diagnosis of shoulder instability scheduled for surgical treatment were included in this prospective multicentric study. Preoperatively, objective and subjective scores were obtained and patients were asked about their postoperative expectations. Additionally, 25 surgeons were interviewed with regard to what they think their patients expect from the surgery using standardized questions. Results: With regard to postoperative expectations surveyed by the Hospital for Special Surgery questionnaire (HSS), the most important goal to achieve for the patients was ‘stopping the shoulder from dislocation’, followed by ‘to improve the ability to exercise or participate in sports’ and ‘being the shoulder to be back the way it was before the issue started’. The ranking of factors for patients was ‘stability’ as the most important to achieve, followed by ‘movement’, ‘strength’, ‘pain’ and ‘cosmetics’. For surgeons, the order was ‘stability’ (p = 0.004 **), ‘movement’ (p = 0.225), ‘pain’ (p = 0.509), ‘strength’ (p = 0.007 **) and ‘cosmetics’ (p = 0.181). There was a significant difference between patients and surgeons with regard to gaining stability at the cost of movement (p = 0.001 **). Conclusion: Patients and surgeons expectations regarding outcome after surgical shoulder stabilization procedures are quite similar with limited topics of disagreement. Generally, surgeons tend to overrate the importance of stability at the costs of other factors.

Development of a single-session physiotherapy and self-management intervention for the treatment of primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation for the 'Acute Rehabilitation following Traumatic anterior shoulder dISlocAtioN (ARTISAN)' multi centre RCT

Objective

Optimum physiotherapy management for people with a conservatively managed primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation is not known. The purpose of the ARTISAN trial is to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a course of usual care physiotherapy with a single session of physiotherapy and self-management, the ARTISAN intervention. ARTISAN is a UK multi-centre, two-arm, parallel group, randomised controlled trial with 1:1 treatment allocation.

Design

The intervention was developed following the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions and will be reported in line with the template for intervention description and replication checklist (TIDieR) and the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT). It was informed by published research, national clinical guidelines, current clinical practice and patient and public involvement.

Results

The ARTISAN intervention comprises education (Phase 1), progressive exercise (Phase 2 and Phase 3) and an optional return to sport component (Phase 4). Behaviour change strategies are embedded throughout intervention. The single session of physiotherapy is delivered by a chartered physiotherapist, within the first six weeks of injury, in an NHS outpatient setting. At the end of the initial session, paper-based booklets and/or a patient website with the same content are provided to participants to aid self-management and progression though the four phases of the trial intervention.

Conclusion

The ARTISAN intervention was successfully implemented throughout the internal pilot and is suitable for testing in the subsequent definitive RCT ARTISAN trial.



Trial Registration Number ISRCTN63184243

Management of atraumatic shoulder instability in physiotherapy (MASIP): a survey of physiotherapy practice

BACKGROUND

The impact of atraumatic shoulder instability (ASI) on patients can be extensive, its management complex, with a biopsychosocial approach recommended. Currently how physiotherapists manage ASI is unknown or the extent to which current clinical practice aligns with existing evidence. At the time of this study no national guidelines or consensus to direct practice existed.

METHODS

A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed between July-September 2018, targeting UK-based physiotherapists managing shoulder pathology. Respondents were invited to describe their management of ASI, and rate their awareness and utilisation of various treatment techniques on a Likert-scale; median and interquartile ranges were calculated. Free text survey items were analysed using quantitative content analysis (QCA) to identify codes and categories. Means and percentages were calculated to summarise QCA and descriptive data.

RESULTS

Valid survey responses were analysed (n = 135). Respondents had between 2 and 39 years of physiotherapy experience (mean = 13.9 years); the majority (71.1 %) reported that ASI made up < 10 % of their caseload. Only 22.9 % (n = 31/135) of respondents reported feeling 'very confident' in managing ASI; the majority feeling 'somewhat confident' (70.4 %, n = 95/135) or 'not confident' (6.7 %, n = 9/135). The majority of respondents (59.3 %) used an ASI classification system, > 90 % citing the Stanmore Classification. Physiotherapists adapted their management according to clinical presentation, responding to differing biopsychosocial needs of the patient scenario. Most respondents (> 80 %) did not use a protocol to guide their management. Exercise was the most utilised management approach for ASI, followed by education; novel treatment strategies, including cortical rehabilitation, were also reported.

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate physiotherapists utilise a wide range of treatment strategies and respond to biopsychosocial cues when managing patients with ASI. The majority reported not being very confident in managing this condition, however only a minority use rehabilitation protocols to support their management. Some interventions that respondents reported using lacked evidence to support their use in ASI management and further research regarding effectiveness is required. Guidelines have been published since this survey; the impact of these will need evaluating to determine their effectiveness in the future.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet for Recurrent Shoulder Instability in Athletes

Background:

In athletes with recurrent shoulder instability, arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) and the open Latarjet procedure (OL) are commonly indicated to restore stability and allow them to return to play (RTP).

Purpose:

To compare the outcomes of ABR and OL in athletes with recurrent shoulder instability.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective review of patients with recurrent shoulder instability who underwent ABR and OL and had a minimum 24-month follow-up. Indications for OL over ABR in this population were those considered at high risk for recurrence, including patients with glenohumeral bone loss. The patients were pair-matched in a 1:1 ratio (OL and ABR) by age, sex, sport, and level of preoperative play. We evaluated the rate, level, and timing of RTP, and the Shoulder Instability–Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI) score between procedures. Additionally we compared the recurrence rate, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Rowe score, satisfaction, and whether patients would undergo the same surgery again.

Results:

Participants included 62 athletes who underwent ABR and 62 who underwent OL, with a mean follow-up of 47.7 months. There was no significant difference between ABR and OL in rate of RTP, return to preinjury level, time to return, SIRSI score, VAS score, SSV, or patient satisfaction. OL resulted in a significantly lower recurrence rate (1.6% vs 16.1% for ABR; P = .009) and a significantly higher Rowe score (mean ± SD, 90.5 ± 12.2 vs 82.2 ± 20.8 for ABR; P = .008). In collision athletes, there was no significant difference between ABR and OL regarding RTP rate (89.1% vs 94.5%; P = .489) or SIRSI score (70.4 ± 24.8 vs 73.8 ± 19.6; P = .426), but OL resulted in a lower recurrence rate (14.5% vs 1.8%; P = .031).

Conclusion:

ABR and OL resulted in excellent clinical outcomes, with high rates of RTP in athletes. However, lower recurrence rates were seen with OL.

Thread-Embedding Acupuncture for the Treatment of Shoulder Instability: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Patient-Assessor Blinded Pilot Study

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine the feasibility of thread-embedding acupuncture (TEA) for the treatment of shoulder instability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a patient-assessor blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial with two parallel arms. A total of 40 patients with shoulder instability aged between 13 and 43 years will be recruited and screened using set inclusion and exclusion criteria. After screening, they will be randomly allocated to the TEA or sham TEA group. Patients in both groups will then receive TEA or sham TEA treatment on six acupoints once a week for 8 weeks, which will be followed by additional follow-up assessments at 4 and 8 weeks after the end of treatment. Changes in shoulder pain and disability will be assessed as the primary outcome, whereas 100-mm pain visual analogue scale, shoulder range of motion, rotator cuff quality of life index, EuroQol 5-dimension 5-levels, treatment satisfaction, economic evaluation, and safety will all be measured as secondary outcomes of the study. Outcome assessment will be conducted at baseline and at 4, 8, and 16 weeks after screening.

CONCLUSION

The results from this trial will help to design further clinical trials on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of performing TEA for shoulder instability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

KCT0005921 (Clinical Research Information Service of the Republic of Korea).

Functional deficits as a result of brachial plexus injury in anterior shoulder dislocation

The incidence of brachial plexus injuries in anterior shoulder dislocation remains relatively uncommon. A retrospective study was conducted to observe the natural neurological recovery of patients following these injuries over a 2-year period. Muscle power according to the Medical Research Council scale and sensation were measured from presentation to discharge. In 28 patients, the power grade of proximal muscles supplied by nine injured nerves failed to improve over a median follow-up of 5 months. There was no statistically significant improvement in sensation over a median follow-up of 6 months. Poorer recovery in muscle power score was related to advancing age, whereby every decade increased the risk by approximately 30%. Anterior shoulder dislocation with a plexus injury carries a risk of permanent nerve injury. Patients should be referred for specialist nerve assessment leading to rehabilitation and timely early nerve reconstruction, if indicated.Level of evidence: IV.

Analysis of patients unable to return to play following arthroscopic Bankart repair

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze patients that did not return to play (RTP) following arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) compared to those who did RTP, and analyze factors associated with not returning to play.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent ABR, and subsequently did not RTP after a minimum of 24-month follow-up was performed. Additionally, these were pair matched in a 3:1 ratio for age, gender, sport and level of pre-operative play with a control group who RTP. Patients were evaluated for their psychological readiness to return to sport using the SIRSI score. Multivariate regression models were used to evaluate factors affecting RTP.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 52 patients who were unable to RTP and 156 who returned to play. Ten patients (19.2 %) who did not RTP passed the SIRSI benchmark of 56 with a mean overall score of 39.8 ± 24.6, in those who returned 73.0 % passed the SIRSI benchmark of 56 with a mean overall score of 68.9 ± 22.0 (p < 0.0001 for both). The most common primary reasons for not returning were 27 felt physically unable to return, whilst 21 felt it was a natural end to their career or their lifestyle had changed. Multi-logistic regression revealed that 4 of the 12 components of the SIRSI score (p < 0.05 for all) and SSV (p = 0.0049), were the factors that were associated with RTP.

CONCLUSION

Following ABR, those that do not return to play exhibit poor psychological readiness to return to play, with multi-linear regression revealing the SIRSI questions associated with fear of re-injury were associated with a lower rate of RTP. Additionally, functional limitations were found to be associated with a lower rate of RTP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet for First-Time Dislocators in Athletes

BACKGROUND

In athletes with a first-time shoulder dislocation, arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) and the open Latarjet procedure (OL) are the most commonly utilized surgical procedures to restore stability and allow them to return to play (RTP).

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of ABR and OL in athletes with a first-time shoulder dislocation.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients with first-time shoulder dislocation who underwent primary ABR and OL and had a minimum 24-month follow-up. Indications for OL over ABR in this population were those considered at high risk for recurrence, including patients with glenohumeral bone loss. Patients who underwent ABR were pair-matched in a 2:1 ratio with patients who underwent OL by age, sex, sport, and level of preoperative play. The rate, level, and timing of RTP, as well as the Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI) score were evaluated. Additionally, we compared recurrence, visual analog scale pain score, Subjective Shoulder Value, Rowe score, satisfaction, and whether patients would undergo the surgery again.

RESULTS

Overall, 80 athletes who underwent ABR and 40 who underwent OL were included, with a mean follow-up of 50.3 months. There was no significant difference between ABR and OL in rate of RTP, return to preinjury level, time to return, or recurrent dislocation rate. There were also no differences between ABR and OL in patient-reported outcome scores or patient satisfaction. When collision athletes were compared between ABR and OL, there were no differences in RTP, SIRSI score, or redislocation rate.

CONCLUSION

ABR and OL resulted in excellent clinical outcomes, with high rates of RTP and low recurrence rates. Additionally, there were no differences between the procedures in athletes participating in collision sports.

Type V superior labral anterior-posterior tears results in lower rates of return to play

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of return to play (RTP) in patients who underwent Type V superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) repair compared to patients who underwent isolated Bankart repair in the setting of traumatic anterior shoulder instability.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair and SLAP repair by a single surgeon between 2012 and 2017 was performed. Additionally, these were pair-matched in a 1:2 ratio for age, sex, sport and level of pre-operative play, with those undergoing isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair alone as a control group. RTP, level of RTP and the timing of RTP were assessed.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 96 patients, with 32 in the study group and 64 in the control group, and a mean follow-up of 59 months. Overall, there was no significant difference in the overall rate of return to play (26/32 (81.3%) vs 56/64 (87.5%), n.s), but there was a significantly higher rate of RTP at the same/higher level in the control group (14/32 (43.6%) vs 43/64 (67.2%), p = 0.0463). There was no significant difference in timing of RTP between the groups (n.s). There was no significant difference in recurrent instability (6/32 (18.8%) vs 5/64 (7.8%), n.s) but there was a significant difference in revision rates (5/32 (15.6%) vs. 2/64 (3.1%), p = 0.0392) between the Type V SLAP repair group and the control group.

CONCLUSION

Following arthroscopic repair, patients with Type V SLAP tears had a similar overall rate of RTP when compared directly to a control group of patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair alone. However, those who underwent Type V SLAP repair reported significantly lower rates of RTP at the same or higher level compared to the control group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Traumatische posteriore Luxation als seltene Ursache einer multidirektionalen Schulterinstabilität im Profisport

Die multidirektionale Instabilität der Schulter als Folge einer traumatischen posterioren Luxation ist selten und in der Literatur nur unzureichend beschrieben. Hier präsentiert wird der Fall eines 28-jährigen Anschiebers aus dem deutschen Bob-Olympia-Kader, der eine weichteilige multidirektionale Instabilität in Folge einer traumatischen posterioren Luxation beim Mountainbiken erlitt. Die Stabilisierung des Schultergelenks erfolgte arthroskopisch mittels kombinierter anteriorer und posteriorer Labrumrefixation.

Evolving Concepts in the Management of Shoulder Instability

BACKGROUND

Shoulder instability exists on a spectrum ranging from subtle subluxation and pain to dislocation and can be the result of a traumatic event or repetitive microtrauma. Shoulder instability can result in significant disability and often requires surgical intervention, especially amongst younger, active patient populations. The optimal treatment of shoulder instability depends on the degree of instability and concomitant pathology involving the labrum, capsule, and bony anatomy of the glenoid and humeral head. Even with surgical intervention, recurrent instability remains a relatively common and difficult problem to address.

PURPOSE

With a focus on anterior instability, the purpose of this review article is to discuss the current assessment and treatment of shoulder instability, and highlight current and future treatment modalities, as well as to identify current trends and deficiencies in our current management. We also provide an algorithm for the surgical treatment of anterior shoulder instability.

METHODS

Literature databases were extensively searched for recent articles related to the mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment of shoulder instability to comprise a comprehensive review.

CONCLUSION

Although there are multiple treatment modalities available for shoulder instability, such as nonoperative management, open and arthroscopic Bankart repair, Latarjet procedures, and remplissage, orthopaedic surgeons continue to learn about the most appropriate method of management as increasing long-term outcomes become available.

Closed reduction techniques for acute anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anterior shoulder dislocations are the most common type of joint dislocation with the majority treated with closed reduction. Reduction methods can be grouped into their principle mode of action: traction-countertraction, leverage and scapular manipulation. The best method has yet to be identified and our aim was to find the most effective, safe and least painful method of closed reduction for acute anterior shoulder dislocations.

METHODS

A search of the online databases of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase was performed to identify randomised control trials (RCTs) comparing closed reduction methods for anterior shoulder dislocations. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Twelve eligible RCTs were included with a total of 1055 patients. Our meta-analysis showed traction-countertraction methods are marginally less painful than leverage methods by 0.86 points on the VAS scale but leverage methods are quicker by 20 s. Amongst traction-countertraction methods, the Spaso technique was the least painful and quickest, albeit with no difference in overall success rate. A meta-analysis was not possible for comparisons involving scapular manipulation due to the paucity of studies, but within two studies, scapular manipulation was significantly less painful than both leverage and traction-countertraction methods by 1.5 and 2.3 points (VAS), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Traction-countertraction methods are less painful but slower than leverage methods with no difference in complication rates. However, there was no difference in overall reduction success rate between any of the groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.