Pretreatment of waste paper for increased ethanol yields

Synergy of municipal solid waste co-processing with lignocellulosic waste for improved biobutanol production

Co-processing of lignocellulosic wastes, e.g., garden and paper wastes, and the organic matters fraction of municipal solid waste (OMSW) in an integrated bioprocess is a possible approach to realize the potential of wastes for biobutanol production. Dilute acid pretreatment is a multi-functional stage for breaking the recalcitrant lignocellulose's structure, hydrolyzing hemicellulose, and hydrolyzing/solubilizing starch, leading to a pretreated solid and a rich hydrolysate. In this study, dilute-acid pretreatment of the combination of wastepaper and OMSW, composite I, as well as garden waste and OMSW, composite II, at severe conditions resulted in "pretreatment hydrolysates" containing 33.7 and 19.4 g/L sugar along with 18.9 and 33.2 g/L soluble starch, respectively. In addition, the hydrolysis of solid remained after the pretreatment of composite I and II resulted in "enzymatic hydrolysates" comprising 19.4 and 33 g/L sugar, respectively. The fermentation of the pretreatment hydrolysates and enzymatic hydrolysates resulted in 3.5 and 6.4 g/L ABE from composite I and 15 and 5.2 g/L ABE from composite II, respectively. In this process, 148 and 173 g ABE (60 and 100 g gasoline equivalent/kg) was obtained from each kg composite I and composite II, respectively, where co-processing of OMSW with lignocellulosic wastes resulted in 10 and 49% higher ABE than that produced from the individual substrates.

A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) comparison of three management options for waste papers: bioethanol production, recycling and incineration with energy recovery

This study uses Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to assess the environmental profiles and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for bioethanol production from waste papers and to compare them with the alternative waste management options of recycling or incineration with energy recovery. Bioethanol production scenarios both with and without pre-treatments were conducted. It was found that an oxidative lime pre-treatment reduced GHG emissions and overall environmental burdens for a newspaper-to-bioethanol process whereas a dilute acid pre-treatment raised GHG emissions and overall environmental impacts for an office paper-to-bioethanol process. In the comparison of bioethanol production systems with alternative management of waste papers by different technologies, it was found that the environmental profiles of each system vary significantly and this variation affects the outcomes of the specific comparisons made. Overall, a number of configurations of bioethanol production from waste papers offer environmentally favourable or neutral profiles when compared with recycling or incineration.