Value of serum determinations for prediction of increased ursodeoxycholic and chenodeoxycholic levels in bile

Bioequivalence of a new liquid formulation of ursodeoxycholic acid (Ursofalk suspension) and Ursofalk capsules measured by plasma pharmacokinetics and biliary enrichment

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid is an approved therapy for hepatobiliary disorders but in infants and children compliance is compromised because it is formulated exclusively as capsules, or tablets.

AIM

To determine the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of a new liquid formulation of ursodeoxycholic acid (Ursofalk suspension) with a standard capsule (Ursofalk) in a randomized, unblinded, crossover designed study of 24 healthy adults.

METHODS

Equivalence was based on single bolus oral plasma pharmacokinetics and biliary ursodeoxycholic acid enrichments after repeat doses. Biliary bile acid composition and hydrophobicity index were also compared. Ursodeoxycholic acid was measured in duodenal bile by high-performance liquid chromatography and in plasma by mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

The mean percentage biliary ursodeoxycholic acid enrichment after administration of the suspension was not significantly different from that obtained with capsules (44.2 +/- 11.7% vs. 46.9 +/- 10.2%, respectively). The equivalence ratio was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.8-1.1), establishing bioequivalence between suspension and capsules. Both formulations reduced the biliary hydrophobicity index and no differences in bile acid composition were observed between formulations. The plasma pharmacokinetics of both formulations was similar and the tolerability of the suspension was excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

A new liquid formulation of ursodeoxycholic acid suitable for paediatric patients is pharmacologically bioequivalent to capsules when given as single, or repeated oral doses.

Colonic transit influences deoxycholic acid kinetics

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Prolonged large bowel transit, and an increase in the proportion of deoxycholic acid (DCA), have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstones-including those developing in acromegalics treated with octreotide. However, there are few data on the effects of intestinal transit on bile acid kinetics.

METHODS

We therefore measured the kinetics of DCA and cholic acid (CA) using stable isotopes, serum sampling, and mass spectrometry. The results were related to mouth-to-caecum (MCTT) and large bowel transit times (LBTTs) in 4 groups of 8 individuals: (1) non-acromegalic controls, (2) acromegalics untreated with octreotide, (3) acromegalics on long-term octreotide, and (4) patients with constipation. Paired, before and during octreotide, studies were performed in 5 acromegalics.

RESULTS

In the unpaired and paired studies, octreotide significantly prolonged MCTT and LBTT. In the paired studies, the octreotide-induced prolongation of LBTT caused an increase in the DCA input rate (6.4 +/- 2.8 to 12 +/- 2.6 micromol. kg. d, P < 0.05) and pool size (18 +/- 12 to 40 +/- 13 micromol/kg, P < 0.05), and a decrease in CA pool size (45 +/- 15 to 25 +/- 11 micromol/kg, P < 0.05). Furthermore, during octreotide treatment, the mean conversion of 13C-CA to 13C-DCA (micromoles) was greater (P < 0.05) on study days 3, 4, and 5. There were also positive linear relationships between LBTT and DCA input rate (r = 0.78), pool size (r = 0.82, P < 0.001), and a weak (r = -0.49) negative linear relationship between LBTT and CA pool size (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the hypothesis that, by increasing DCA formation and absorption, prolongation of large bowel transit is a pathogenic factor in the formation of octreotide-induced gallstones.

Bioavailability of four ursodeoxycholic acid preparations

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the drug of choice for treating primary biliary cirrhosis and dissolving cholesterol gallstones.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the bioavailability of four commercially available ursodeoxycholic acid formulations in standardized doses.

METHODS

Twenty-four healthy subjects were studied in groups of four, and received each of the different UDCA preparations in random order, with a 1-week washout or more in-between. Serum UDCA levels were determined for a 6-h period. The mean area under the curve (AUC), Cmax and Tmax were determined for each drug formulation, and the results compared. Dose proportionality was determined using the Canadian Ursofalk tablet using either 250 mg, 500 mg or 750 mg dosing. The intraparticipant variability was assessed by asking each participant to repeat the last drug that they took the second time, 1 week later.

RESULTS

The mean AUC was 68.99 micromol/1.6 h-1 for the USA UDCA tablet, 59.34 micromol/1.6 h-1 for the Canadian UDCA tablet, 55.55 micromol/1.6 h-1 for Ursolvan capsules, and 46.66 micromol/1.6 h-1 for Actigall capsules. The mean Cmax values were 24.29, 17.85, 16.63 and 413.32 nmol/mL, respectively. The mean Tmax was 1.82, 2.3, 2.79 and 3.39 h, respectively. Linear aggression analysis assessing the direct proportionality of AUC on the dose for the Canadian UDCA tablet gave an estimate of 0.063 + 0.0164 (standard error, P-value=0.0117), e.g. if the dose increases from 250 mg to 500 mg, the serum ursodeoxycholic acid increases by 250 x 0.063=15.75. There was excellent reproducibility for the AUC for the North American tablets (0.97, 0.88) compared to the two capsules (0.32, 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The significantly higher AUC and Cmax and shorter Tmax for the Canadian Ursofalk tablets compared to the UDCA capsule preparations supports better bioavailability.

Relationship between biliary and serum bile acids and response to ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) improves liver biochemistries and enriches the bile with UDCA in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to determine whether the degree of enrichment of bile correlated with that of serum and whether either of these measures correlated with improvement in measures of liver disease.

METHODS

In a randomized study, biliary and serum bile acid analyses were performed at entry and after 2 yr of UDCA or placebo.

RESULTS

The percentage of ursodeoxycholic acid in bile increased by 42% in the UDCA group (n = 61) compared with 8% in the placebo group (n = 57) (p < 0.0001). Measurement of serum bile acids in 32 patients (18 ursodeoxycholic acid, 14 placebo) indicated that at 2 yr, ursodeoxycholic acid comprised 65% of serum bile acids in the treated group and 7% in the placebo group. Agreement between bile and serum was fair (r = 0.75, p < or = 0.00002) because in some patients, plasma but not biliary bile acids were enriched with UDCA. Changes in biliary ursodeoxycholic acid correlated significantly but weakly with the changes in serum alkaline phosphatase, AST, bilirubin, and in Mayo risk score. Correlations between changes in serum bile acid composition and biochemical measures of disease activity were even weaker.

CONCLUSION

The measurement of biliary bile acids is superior to that of serum bile acids for assessing the compliance and changes in the circulating bile acids in patients receiving ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis. Furthermore, measures to further increase the proportion of ursodeoxycholic acid in circulating bile acids should be explored.

Biotransformation of orally administered ursodeoxycholic acid in man as observed in gallbladder bile, serum and urine

The aim of this study was to evaluate the biotransformation of orally administered ursodeoxycholic acid in man. The distribution of ursodeoxycholic acid and its metabolites in gallbladder bile, in serum and in urine with emphasis on separation of their unconjugated, amidated and sulfated species in particular, was investigated. Seven gallstone patients were given 750 mg of ursodeoxycholic acid daily for 2-3 weeks. Six gallstone patients who did not receive ursodeoxycholic acid served as controls. Ursodeoxycholic acid became the major bile acid in gallbladder bile contributing 43% to total bile acids. 2% of biliary ursodeoxycholic acids were in the unconjugated form, 87% in the amidated form and 11% in the sulfated form. Iso-ursodeoxycholic acid was found in bile in small amounts and was present only as the sulfated species and not as the amidated one. Other metabolites of ursodeoxycholic acid tentatively identified in bile were 1 beta, 12 beta, 6 alpha- and 21,22-hydroxylated derivatives of ursodeoxycholic acid. Lithocholic acid in bile tended to increase under ursodeoxycholic acid treatment and was positively correlated to ursodeoxycholic acid. The concentration of cholic acid in bile decreased significantly whereas the levels of deoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid did not change. Total bile acid concentration in serum and excretion of bile acids in urine increased from 5.4 +/- 1.1 to 18.4 +/- 9.5 mumol l-1 (mean +/- SD, P < 0.005) and from 5.6 +/- 1.3 to 13.1 +/- 7.9 mumol g-1 creatinine (mean +/- SD, P < 0.05) after ursodeoxycholic acid ingestion mainly due to spillover and excretion of ursodeoxycholic acid.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy in cystic fibrosis-associated liver disease: a dose-response study

Previous studies from our groups have demonstrated improvements in biochemical markers of liver function when cystic fibrosis patients with associated liver disease were administered oral ursodeoxycholic acid. The magnitude of the response was somewhat less than that found when comparable doses (10 to 15 mg/kg body wt/day) of ursodeoxycholic acid are given to other liver disease patients; this may be explained by the bile acid malabsorption that is characteristic of the disease. For this reason a dose-response study was carried out in nine cystic fibrosis patients with liver disease to establish whether improved efficacy could be obtained with higher doses. Ursodeoxycholic acid in doses of 5, 10 and 15 mg/kg body wt/day was given orally for consecutive 2-mo periods in a replicated Latin-square design. After this, all patients received 20 mg/kg body wt/day. Liver function, individual serum bile acids and biliary bile acid composition were determined at entry and at the end of each treatment period. Our data demonstrate that the magnitude of the biochemical improvement in serum liver enzymes was significantly greater with higher doses of ursodeoxycholic acid; at 20 mg/kg body wt/day it was similar to that reported for patients with other liver diseases administered lower doses. Biliary ursodeoxycholic acid enrichment increased with increasing doses, attaining 42% +/- 6% of the total biliary bile acids with the highest dose. Fasting serum ursodeoxycholic acid concentrations increased during ursodeoxycholic acid administration but were variable and correlated poorly with the dose of ursodeoxycholic acid administered, whereas no correlation was found between serum ursodeoxycholic acid concentration and the proportion of ursodeoxycholic acid in bile.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)