A ring electrode to record extraocular muscle activities during skull base surgery

Intraoperative lateral rectus electromyographic recordings optimized by deep intraorbital needle electrodes

OBJECTIVE

We demonstrate the advantages and safety of long, intraorbitally-placed needle electrodes, compared to standard-length subdermal electrodes, when recording lateral rectus electromyography (EMG) during intracranial surgeries.

METHODS

Insulated 25 mm and uninsulated 13 mm needle electrodes, aimed at the lateral rectus muscle, were placed in parallel during 10 intracranial surgeries, examining spontaneous and stimulation-induced EMG activities. Postoperative complications in these patients were reviewed, alongside additional patients who underwent long electrode placement in the lateral rectus.

RESULTS

In 40 stimulation-induced recordings from 10 patients, the 25 mm electrodes recorded 6- to 26-fold greater amplitude EMG waveforms than the 13 mm electrodes. The 13 mm electrodes detected greater unwanted volume conduction upon facial nerve stimulation, typically exceeding the amplitude of abducens nerve stimulation. Except for one case with lateral canthus ecchymosis, no clinical or radiographic complications occurred in 36 patients (41 lateral rectus muscles) following needle placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramuscular recordings from long electrode in the lateral rectus offers more reliable EMG monitoring than 13 mm needles, with excellent discrimination between abducens and facial nerve stimulations, and without significant complications from needle placement.

SIGNIFICANCE

Long intramuscular electrode within the orbit for lateral rectus EMG recording is practical and reliable for abducens nerve monitoring.

Resection of Oculomotor Nerve Lesions Using Continuous Stimulation of the Oculomotor Nerve Proximal to the Lesion: A Technical Report

BACKGROUND

We describe a continuous monitoring method aimed at preserving nerve function during biopsy of lesions on the oculomotor nerve using stimulation of the oculomotor nerve proximal to the lesion.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 5-year-old girl with a recurrent left oculomotor nerve palsy and contrast-enhancing left oculomotor nerve mass on magnetic resonance imaging underwent a biopsy of the lesion to aid in its diagnosis. At the time of surgery, needle electrodes were inserted into the superior and inferior rectus muscles percutaneously, and cotton-covered electrodes were implanted into the oculomotor nerve proximal to the lesion. Compound muscle action potentials of the oculomotor nerve were measured continuously by monopolar stimulation. The lesion was mapped by direct stimulation, and the unresponsive area was excised. The amplitude of the compound muscle action potentials decreased during the resection but recovered postoperatively. After resection of the lesion, the compound muscle action potentials remained the same as they were preoperatively. No obvious postoperative oculomotor nerve palsy was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This method of continuous monitoring of the function of the oculomotor nerve is simple to use and is suitable for lesions in close proximity to the oculomotor nerve.

Cranial nerve monitoring in endoscopic endonasal surgery of skull base tumors (observing of 23 cases)

Background

Preservation of anatomic integrity and function of the cranial nerves during the removal of skull base tumors is one of the most challenging procedures in endoscopic endonasal surgery. It is possible to use intraoperative mapping and identification of the cranial nerves in order to facilitate their preservation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative trigger electromyography in prevention of iatrogenic damage to the cranial nerves.

Methods

Twenty three patients with various skull base tumors (chordomas, neuromas, pituitary adenomas, meningiomas, cholesteatomas) underwent mapping and identification of cranial nerves during tumor removal using the endoscopic endonasal approach in Department of Neurooncology of Federal State Autonomous Institution “N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation from 2013 to 2018. During the surgical interventions, mapping and identification of the cranial nerves were carried out using electromyography in triggered mode. The effectiveness of the method was evaluated based on a comparison with a control group (41 patients).

Results

In the main group of patients, 44 nerves were examined during surgery using triggered electromyography. During the study, the III, V, VI, VII, and XII cranial nerves were identified intraoperatively. Postoperative cranial nerve deficiency was observed in 5 patients in the study group and in 13 patients in the control group. The average length of hospitalization was 9 days.

Conclusion

We did not receive statistically significant data supporting the fact that intraoperative identification of cranial nerves using trigger electromyography reduces the incidence of postoperative complications in the form of cranial nerve deficits (p = 0.56), but the odds ratio (0.6) suggests a less frequent occurrence of complications in the study group.

Based on our experience, the trigger electromyography methodology appears quite promising and requires further research.

Novel method of intraoperative ocular movement monitoring using a piezoelectric device: experimental study of ocular motor nerve activating piezoelectric potentials (OMNAPP) and clinical application for skull base surgeries

Intraoperative monitoring systems that utilize various evoked potentials for the detection and/or preservation of cranial nerves have become increasingly common due to recent technical and commercial developments, particularly during skull base surgeries. We established a novel system for the intraoperative monitoring of the extraocular motor nerves (eOMNs) using a piezoelectric device capable of detecting imperceptible vibrations induced by ocular movement, with sensors placed on the eyelids alone. We first evaluated the efficacy and reliability of this device for the intraoperative monitoring of eOMNs in two Beagle dogs. Based on the results, we then determined the appropriate stimulation parameters for use in human surgical cases involving removal of various skull base tumors. Animal experiments revealed that a 0.4 mA monopolar electrical stimulation was required to elicit significant responses and that these responses were not inferior to those obtained via the electrooculogram/electromyogram. Significant responses were also detected in preliminary clinical investigations in human patients, following both direct and indirect monopolar electrical stimulation of the oculomotor and abducens nerves, although obtaining responses from the trochlear nerve was difficult. Intraoperative monitoring using a piezoelectric device provides a simple and reliable method for detecting eOMNs, especially the oculomotor and abducens nerves. This monitoring system can be adapted to various surgeries for skull base tumor.

Electrophysiology of Extraocular Cranial Nerves: Oculomotor, Trochlear, and Abducens Nerve

The utility of extraocular cranial nerve electrophysiologic recordings lies primarily in the operating room during skull base surgeries. Surgical manipulation during skull base surgeries poses a risk of injury to multiple cranial nerves, including those innervating extraocular muscles. Because tumors distort normal anatomic relationships, it becomes particularly challenging to identify cranial nerve structures. Studies have reported the benefits of using intraoperative spontaneous electromyographic recordings and compound muscle action potentials evoked by electrical stimulation in preventing postoperative neurologic deficits. Apart from surgical applications, electromyography of extraocular muscles has also been used to guide botulinum toxin injections in patients with strabismus and as an adjuvant diagnostic test in myasthenia gravis. In this article, we briefly review the rationale, current available techniques to monitor extraocular cranial nerves, technical difficulties, clinical and surgical applications, as well as future directions for research.

Usefulness of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of oculomotor and abducens nerves during skull base surgery

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of the extraocular cranial nerve (EOCN) is not commonly performed because of technical difficulty and risk, reliability of the result and predictability of the postoperative function of the EOCN.

METHODS

We performed oculomotor nerve (CN III) and abducens nerve (CN VI) intraoperative monitoring in patients with skull base surgery by recording the spontaneous muscle activity (SMA) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP). Two types of needle electrodes of different length were percutaneously inserted into the extraocular muscles with the free-hand technique. We studied the relationships between the SMA and CMAP and postoperative function of CN III and CN VI.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were included. Nineteen oculomotor nerves and 22 abducens nerves were monitored during surgery, respectively. Neurotonic discharge had a positive predictive value of less than 50% and negative predictive value of more than 80% for postoperative CN III and CN VI dysfunction. The latency of patients with postoperative CN III dysfunction was 2.79 ± 0.13 ms, longer than that with intact CN III function (1.73 ± 0.11 ms). One patient had transient CN VI dysfunction, whose CMAP latency (2.54 ms) was longer than that of intact CN VI function (2.11 ± 0.38 ms). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with paresis and with intact function.

CONCLUSIONS

The method of intraoperative monitoring of EOCNs described here is safe and useful to record responses of SMA and CMAP. Neurotonic discharge seems to have limited value in predicting the postoperative function of CN III and CN VI. The onset latency of CMAP longer than 2.5 ms after tumor removal is probably relevant to postoperative CN III and CN VI dysfunction. However, a definite quantitative relationship has not been found between the amplitude and stimulation intensity of CMAP and the postoperative outcome of CN III and CN VI.

Intra-operative electrooculographic monitoring to prevent post-operative extraocular motor nerve dysfunction during skull base surgeries

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Intra-operative identification and preservation of extraocular motor nerves is one of the main goals of surgeries for skull base tumours and this is done by monitoring the extraocular movement (EOM). Intra-operative electromyographic monitoring has been reported, but it is a complex and skilful process. Electrooculography (EOG) is a simple and reliable technique for monitoring EOMs. We aimed to assess the utility of EOG monitoring in preventing extraocular motor nerve dysfunction during skull base surgeries.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, intra-operative EOG recordings were obtained using disposable needle electrodes placed on the periorbital skin and the polarity of the waves noted for interpretation. Triggered as well as continuous EOG responses were recorded after monopolar electrode stimulation of cranial nerve (CN) during tumour removal which helped the surgeon with careful dissection and avoiding potential nerve injuries.

RESULTS

Of the 11 cases monitored, oculomotor and abducent nerves were identified in all cases, but the trochlear nerve could not be definitively identified. Six patients had no pre- or post-operative extraocular motor nerve dysfunction. The other five patients had pre-existing deficits before surgery, which recovered completely in two, significantly in one, and did not improve in two patients at 3-6 months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

EOG was found to be a simple and reliable method of monitoring extraocular motor nerves (CNs III and VI) intraoperatively.

Value of Free-Run Electromyographic Monitoring of Extraocular Cranial Nerves during Expanded Endonasal Surgery (EES) of the Skull Base

Objective To evaluate the value of free-run electromyography (f-EMG) monitoring of extraocular cranial nerves (EOCN) III, IV, and VI during expanded endonasal surgery (EES) of the skull base in reducing iatrogenic cranial nerve (CN) deficits.

Design We retrospectively identified 200 patients out of 990 who had at least one EOCN monitored during EES. We further separated patients into groups according to the specific CN monitored. In each CN group, we classified patients who had significant (SG) f-EMG activity as Group I and those who did not as Group II.

Results A total of 696 EOCNs were monitored. The number of muscles supplied by EOCNs that had SG f-EMG activity was 88, including CN III = 46, CN IV = 21, and CN VI = 21. There were two deficits involving CN VI in patients who had SG f-EMG activity during surgery. There were 14 deficits observed, including CN III = 3, CN IV = 2, and CN VI = 9 in patients who did not have SG f-EMG activity during surgery.

Conclusions f-EMG monitoring of EOCN during EES can be useful in identifying the location of the nerve. It seems to have limited value in predicting postoperative neurological deficits. Future studies to evaluate the EMG of EOCN during EES need to be done with both f-EMG and triggered EMG.

Intraoperative electro-oculographic Monitoring for Skull Base Surgery

During surgery on the skull base, preservation of the integrity of the ocular motor nerves is vitally important. Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring methods for protecting such functions have been reported by several investigators. However, these methods so far have not been popularized sufficiently, due to the difficulty and complexity of the procedures involved. The authors have developed an extremely simple but far more reliable method using electro-oculography under total intravenous anesthesia with propofol to preserve the integrity of the ocular motor nerves. The ocular motor nerves were stimulated with a monopolar electrode intracranially, and the polarity of the waves was recorded using surface electrodes placed around the eyeball, yielding precise information concerning the locations of the oculomotor nerve and/or abducent nerve. In addition, by performing continuous monitoring, invasive procedures affecting the ocular motor nerves could be detected as spontaneous ocular movements. In practice at our department, this method has been applied in 12 cases with tumors close to the ocular motor nerves, and has produced excellent results.

Origins of surface potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of oculomotor nerves: are they related to electrooculographic or electromyographic events?

OBJECT

Evoked potentials elicited by electrical stimulation of the oculomotor nerve and recorded from surface electrodes placed on the skin around the eyeball reportedly originate in the eye and are represented on electrooculograms. Because evoked potentials recorded from surface electrodes are extremely similar to those of extraocular muscles, which are represented on electromyograms, the authors investigated the true origin of these potentials.

METHODS

Evoked potentials elicited by electrical stimulation of the canine oculomotor nerve were recorded from surface electrodes placed on the skin around the eyeball. A thread sutured to the center of the cornea was pulled and the potentials that were evoked during the resultant eye movement were recorded. These potentials were confirmed to originate in the eye and to be represented on electrooculograms because their waveforms were unaffected by the administration of muscle relaxant. To eliminate the influence of this source, the retina, a main origin of standing potentials of the eyeball, was removed. This resulted in the disappearance of electrooculography (EOG) waves elicited by eye movement. Surface potentials elicited by oculomotor nerve stimulation were the same before and after removal of the retina. Again the oculomotor nerve was electrically stimulated and electromyography (EMG) response of the extraocular muscles was recorded at the same time that potentials were recorded from the surface electrodes. In their peak latencies, amplitudes, and waveforms, the evoked potentials obtained from surface electrodes were almost identical to EMG responses of extraocular muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

Evoked potentials elicited by electrical stimulation of the oculomotor nerves and obtained from surface electrodes originated from EMG responses of extraocular muscles. These evoked potentials do not derive from the eye.

Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring of oculomotor nuclei and their intramedullary tracts during midbrain tumor surgery

OBJECTIVE

During surgery for intrinsic midbrain lesions, we intraoperatively recorded evoked compound muscle action potentials (ECMAPs) from the extraocular muscles and evaluated how this type of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring could minimize postoperative oculomotor nerve palsy (ptosis and/or diplopia).

METHODS

The ECMAPs were recorded through a spring electrode applied to the extraocular muscle (Method 1, seven cases) or a needle electrode inserted into the superior intraorbital space (Method 2, five cases). The surgeon repeated electrical stimulations whenever tissue of unknown origin was encountered intraoperatively, and this information was used to safely guide surgical resection of the tumors.

RESULTS

Using these monitoring techniques, the response-free areas were resected and the areas from which ECMAP responses were recorded were avoided. For all 12 patients, ECMAPs were successfully recorded from the extraocular muscles. Ten patients did not exhibit any postoperative deterioration of oculomotor nerve function. Two patients exhibited deterioration of oculomotor nerve function immediately after surgery, which resolved within 1 month. Equally robust ECMAPs could be recorded with Method 2, compared with Method 1.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative ECMAP recordings from the extraocular muscles precisely indicated the locations of the oculomotor nuclei and/or intramedullary oculomotor tracts. Although Method 2 is a more indirect method for recording ECMAPs than is Method 1, Method 2 was equally useful in recording ECMAPs, which seemed to be the summed potentials from the superior rectus muscle and the levator palpebrae superioris muscle. These monitoring techniques are valuable in guiding surgeons to avoid causing inadvertent harm to the oculomotor nuclei and tracts during midbrain surgery, particularly when the neuroanatomic features are distorted by the presence of tumor.

Intraoperative electrooculographic monitoring of oculomotor nerve function during skull base surgery. Technical note

Intraoperative monitoring techniques for protecting the integrity of the oculomotor nerves during skull base surgery have been reported by several investigators, all of which involved the use of electromyographic responses to extraocular muscles. However, these techniques have not yet become popular because of the complexity of the procedures. The authors report an extremely simple and far more reliable technique in which electrooculographic (EOG) monitoring is used. The oculomotor nerves were stimulated with a monopolar electrode during skull base exposure. The polarity of the EOG responses recorded with surface electrodes placed on the skin around the eyeball yielded precise information concerning the location and function of the oculomotor and abducent nerves. In addition, with the aid of continuous EOG monitoring that detected transient changes in the background waves, surgical procedures that might impinge on oculomotor nerve function could be avoided. The present technique has been used in eight patients with skull base tumors and with it, the authors have achieved excellent results.

Intraoperative recordings of evoked extraocular muscle activities to monitor ocular motor nerve function

During 22 operations in 18 patients, we stimulated the ocular motor nerves electrically, intracranially, and recorded compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) directly from the extraocular muscles with a ring electrode that we developed. Recording electrodes were applied in 52 instances to the superior rectus, medial rectus, superior oblique, or lateral rectus muscle and to the levator palpebrae superioris in 2 instances; CMAP were recorded successfully from 22 muscles. Evoked CMAP were not recorded in 2 instances because of problems with recording equipment; in the remaining 30 instances, no evoked CMAP were recorded because 1) the oculomotor or abducens nerve was not exposed during the operation; or 2) the recording electrode on the superior oblique muscle had not been properly placed to record trochlear nerve CMAP. Placement of this electrode is difficult. Ocular motor nerve function was analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively to evaluate the usefulness of this intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring method in preventing damage to ocular motor nerves. The results of this study showed that monitoring enables surgeons to locate precisely ocular motor nerves that would otherwise have been overlooked and thus possibly injured during surgery. Monitoring results also confirmed the surgeons' visual findings, thus helping the surgeons operate with greater confidence. Further, intraoperative monitoring provided us with some insights into the pathophysiology of ocular motor nerve dysfunction caused by skull base lesions; we documented electrophysiologically the occurrence of the slowing of conduction in the ocular motor nerves. We conclude that monitoring ocular motor nerve CMAP can reduce the incidence of surgical complications such as functional blindness due to inadvertent sectioning of one of these nerves and that it would be worthwhile to conduct studies of this technique in many more cases to validate our findings.