Long term monitoring of ventricular fluid pressure in patients with head injury problems and indications

Resolution of brain edema in severe brain injury at controlled high and low intracranial pressures

A series of 87 patients with severe brain injury were studied. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and external ventricular drainage were used to control ICP at high and low levels. Clearance of ytterbium-169-labeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (169Yb-DTPA), Evans blue dye, and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid protein was measured at the two ICP levels over consecutive periods of 4 hours to confirm clearance of brain edema. The results support the hypothesis that brain edema is in part absorbed in the cerebrospinal fluid via transventricular flow.

CSF withdrawal for the treatment of intracranial hypertension in acute head injuries

Long-term ICP recording was carried out in 151 acute head injury patients- 131 comatose patients admitted to ICU, and 20 non-comatose patients harbouring intracerebral mass lesions (lacerations or haematomas) in whom a decision to operate was doubtful. CSF withdrawal was used in 39 cases: by intermittent subtraction in 23 patients, and by continuous ventricular drainage (VD) in the remainder. In the acute stage, within 72 hours or injury, CSF subtraction proved of little use in influencing ICP or clinical time course. Conversely, at a latter stage, CSF withdrawal either by repeated intermittent subtraction or by continuous VD could very often control raised ICP. However, some patients had to undergo permanent shunting eventually. Elevated ICP was also safely controlled in four out of eight patients with intracerebral mass lesions and stationary symptoms. Such patients recovered quickly, and operation was avoided.

Predicting lethal outcome after severe head injury -- a computer-assisted analysis of neurological symptoms and laboratory values

A total number of 58 parameters (laboratory values, neurological symptoms, and vegetative parameters) were evaluated in 150 patients during the first seven days after severe head injury. The patients were divided into two groups, "survivors" and "non-survivors". Eight easily evaluable routine parameters with the most significant differences between the two groups of patients were used for statistical evaluation of a "no survival chance score". These highly indicative parameters are serum osmolarity and urea, blood glucose, total bilirubin, motor reaction to stimuli, body temperature, respiratory activity, and pupil reaction. A "low survival chance limit" was evaluated from each of these parameters by computer analysis. None of the patients in the series survived when three or more of these eight parameters had climbed beyond the limit. So far, the system is able to predict "no survival chances" in 50.8% of the non-survivors some six days prior to death; 80% of these predictions could be made by the fourth day after injury.