In vitro activity of clarithromycin and its 14-hydroxy-metabolite against 203 strains of Haemophilus influenzae

In vitro activity and pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic parameters of clarithromycin and azithromycin: why they matter in the treatment of respiratory tract infections

Clarithromycin and azithromycin are second-generation macrolides established and widely used for treating a range of upper and lower respiratory tract infections. Extensive clinical trials data indicate that these drugs are highly effective in these applications and broadly comparable in their clinical and microbiological effectiveness. However, consideration of pharmacokinetic, metabolic, and tissue-penetration data, including the significant antibacterial activity of the metabolite 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin, plus the findings of pharmacodynamic modeling, provide evidence that the long half-life and lower potency of azithromycin predispose this agent to select for resistant isolates. Comparison of the "mutant-prevention concentrations" of clarithromycin and azithromycin, and examination of large-scale epidemiological data from Canada, also support the view that these drugs differ materially in their propensity to promote resistance among bacterial strains implicated in common respiratory infections, and that clarithromycin may offer important advantages over azithromycin that should be considered when choosing a macrolide to treat these conditions.

Clarithromycin Extended-Release Tablet

Clarithromycin is an orally active, advanced-generation macrolide that has been reformulated as an extended-release tablet (Biaxin) XL Filmtab allowing convenient once-daily administration. The reformulation is intended to improve patient compliance and the tolerability of the drug. Although maximum plasma clarithromycin concentrations are lower and reached later with the extended-release tablets than with the immediate-release tablets, the two formulations are bioequivalent with respect to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve. Bioequivalence is also achieved between the formulations for the microbiologically active metabolite, 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin. Two randomized trials in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) showed that a 7-day course of clarithromycin extended-release 1000 mg once daily produced clinical cure rates of 83% and 85% and bacteriologic cure rates of 86% and 92% at the test-of-cure study visit. Similar rates of cure were achieved with a 7-day course of twice-daily clarithromycin immediate-release and with a 10-day course of twice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.A 7-day course of clarithromycin extended-release 1000 mg once daily produced clinical and bacteriologic cure rates of 88% and 86%, respectively, in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Similar cure rates were achieved in recipients of once-daily levofloxacin in the same trial. In patients with acute maxillary sinusitis, a 14-day course of either once-daily clarithromycin extended-release or twice-daily clarithromycin immediate-release produced statistically equivalent clinical cure rates of 85% and 79%, respectively. Both treatment groups achieved similar rates of radiographic success and resolution of sinusitis. Recent results indicate that clarithromycin extended-release 500 mg once daily for 5 days is also effective in the treatment of patients with streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis and in the treatment of AECB. The most frequently reported drug-related events with clarithromycin extended-release were abnormal taste (7% incidence), diarrhea (6%) and nausea (3%). Most adverse drug reactions were of a mild and transient nature. In comparative clinical trials, clarithromycin extended-release had an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with the immediate-release formulation. In addition, clarithromycin extended-release was better tolerated than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and as well tolerated as levofloxacin. Further studies are required to assess the cost-effectiveness ratio of clarithromycin relative to comparator antibacterial agents.

CONCLUSION

Clarithromycin extended-release is an effective treatment for AECB, CAP, acute maxillary sinusitis, and pharyngitis (although not approved for the latter in the US), and is administered in a convenient dosage regimen that has the potential to encourage good compliance. The reformulation modulates clarithromycin absorption kinetics thereby improving tolerability. Therefore, clarithromycin extended-release provides a useful option for the treatment of specific respiratory tract infections.

Clarithromycin in 2003: sustained efficacy and safety in an era of rising antibiotic resistance

Data from surveillance studies show increasing prevalence of respiratory pathogens resistant to commonly used antibiotics. Thus, a Medline search was conducted to identify studies of clarithromycin, especially those addressing macrolide resistance. Changing trends of in vitro susceptibility have not affected clinical efficacy with clarithromycin. Over the last 12 years, clarithromycin study results have shown consistent rates of clinical cure and bacteriological eradication, which are similar to those observed with comparator agents. The incidence of clarithromycin treatment failure in patients infected with Streptococcus pneumoniae is substantially less than that predicted by macrolide resistance rates from surveillance programmes. In summary, despite widespread use since its introduction, clarithromycin remains active both in vitro and in vivo against clinically relevant respiratory tract pathogens.

Comparison of once- and twice-daily clarithromycin in the treatment of adults with severe acute lower respiratory tract infections

BACKGROUND

Although the modified-release (MR) formulation of clarithromycin has demonstrated bioequivalence to the immediate-release (IR) formulation and thus can be prescribed for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs), a MEDLINE search from 1995 through 1998 and information on file with the manufacturer indicate that no data are available on the effectiveness of this new formulation in the treatment of severe LRTIs such as community-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to compare clinical success rates (percentage of patients with clinical cure or improvement) with once- and twice-daily regimens of clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with severe, acute LRTIs requiring oral antibiotic therapy.

METHODS

In this multicenter, investigator-blinded, randomized, parallel-group study, adult patients with clinical evidence suggesting severe, acute LRTI were recruited from 22 general practices in the United Kingdom. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either clarithromycin 500 mg BID (IR tablets) or clarithromycin 1 g OD (two 500-mg MR tablets) for 7 to 14 days. The outcome measures were resolution of or improvement in clinical signs and symptoms (including resolution of cough), unscheduled visits for the same symptom, days to resumption of normal activities, and improvements in quality of life (assessed using the EQ-5D version of the EuroQoL questionnaire). Clinical, microbiologic, and serologic assessments were performed before, during, and after treatment. Efficacy and safety data were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty men (n = 83) and women (n = 77) between the ages of 19 and 88 years took part in the study, 78 receiving clarithromycin 500 mg BID and 82 receiving clarithromycin 1 g OD. At 4 weeks after the start of treatment, the high clinical success rates were comparable between groups: 84.6% with clarithromycin 500 mg BID and 90.2% with clarithromycin 1 g OD. No significant differences in outcome measures were noted between the 2 regimens. Both treatments were well tolerated, with taste disturbance being the most commonly reported adverse event (10.6% vs 6.1% with clarithromycin 500 mg BID and 1 g OD, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2 clarithromycin regimens were equally efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of severe, acute LRTIs. However, caution should be exercised in applying these results to the general population, because the study excluded certain categories of patients who would normally be treated. In addition, the small sample size may have obscured clinically significant differences between the 2 regimens.

Suspicion of quinolone active metabolite following discrepancy between predicted and experimental urine bactericidal activities

The prediction of urine antibacterial activity from pharmacological and microbiological parameters was assessed by using experimental urine levels and urine bactericidal titers determined up to 72 h after a 400-mg single dose of two quinolones in a phase I study. The area under the bactericidal curve (AUBC) was accurately predicted for norfloxacin but significantly (P < 0.001) underestimated for rufloxacin (actual value was four times higher than the predicted value against Escherichia coli and two times higher against Staphylococcus aureus). In vitro susceptibility differences between the two strains predicted the ex vivo AUBC differences for norfloxacin but not for rufloxacin, where ex vivo differences were greater than expected. Urine bactericidal titers for up to 72 h were accurately predicted for norfloxacin against E. coli and S. aureus and for rufloxacin against S. aureus, but experimental activity for up to 48 h was four times higher (P < 0.001) than the predicted activity for rufloxacin against E. coli. In the case of norfloxacin, the duration of adequate urine antibacterial activity against S. aureus was overestimated. Inaccurate estimations of ex vivo antibacterial activity of a suspected active metabolite (as with rufloxacin) when an adequate cutoff is not established may have dosing implications.

A comparative study of clarithromycin and amoxycillin suspensions in the treatment of pediatric patients with acute otitis media

This phase III, single-blind, randomized, multicentre clinical trial compared the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and amoxycillin in the treatment of otitis media in pediatric patients. Two hundred and fifty-nine patients aged 1-12 were prescribed suspensions of clarithromycin (132 patients) or amoxycillin (127 patients). Both suspensions were prescribed at a dose of 125 mg for children weighing less that 25 kg or at 250 mg for children weighing more than 25 kg, but three doses of amoxycillin per day were given, while only two doses clarithromycin per day were required. Each drug was administered for approximately 5 days. Clinical evaluations were performed pre-treatment (Study Day 1), at the end of treatment (Study Days 6-9), and post-treatment (Study Days 28-32). At the end of treatment, 91 out of 114 evaluable patients (80%) had clinical cures with clarithromycin, while 71 out of 105 evaluable patients (68%) had clinical cures with amoxycillin (p = 0.057). Clinical success rates were 96% for both treatments (110/114, clarithromycin; 101/105 amoxycillin). Adverse events related to the study medications occurred in four of 132 patients receiving clarithromycin (3%) and eight out of 127 subjects receiving amoxycillin (6%). Three patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events, all three receiving amoxycillin. At the doses administered, clarithromycin given twice-daily was as safe and effective as given three-times-daily in the treatment of acute otitis media in pediatric patients.

Clarithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential

Clarithromycin is an acid-stable orally administered macrolide antimicrobial drug, structurally related to erythromycin. It has a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, similar to that of erythromycin and inhibits a range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, atypical pathogens and some anaerobes. Significantly, clarithromycin demonstrates greater in vitro activity than erythromycin against certain pathogens including Bacteroides melaninogenicus, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycobacterium chelonae subspecies--chelonae and--abscessus, Mycobacterium leprae, Mycobacterium marinum, Mycobacterium avium complex, Legionella spp. and, when combined with its 14-hydroxy metabolite, against Haemophilus influenzae. However, bacterial strains resistant to erythromycin are also generally resistant to clarithromycin. The antimicrobial activity of clarithromycin appears to be enhanced by the formation in vivo of the microbiologically active 14-hydroxy metabolite. In combination, additive or synergistic activity against a variety of pathogens including Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Legionella species (principally Legionella pneumophila) and various staphylococci and streptococci has been demonstrated. Clarithromycin has a superior pharmacokinetic profile to that of erythromycin, allowing the benefits of twice daily administration with the potential for increased compliance among outpatients where a more frequent regimen for erythromycin might otherwise be indicated. The clinical efficacy of clarithromycin has been confirmed in the treatment of infections of the lower and upper respiratory tracts (including those associated with atypical pathogens), skin/soft tissues, and in paediatrics. Clarithromycin was as effective as erythromycin and other appropriate drugs including beta-lactams (penicillins and cephalosporins) in some of the above infections. A most promising indication for clarithromycin appears to be in the treatment of immunocompromised patients infected with M. avium complex, M. chelonae sp. and Toxoplasma sp. Small initial trials in this setting reveal clarithromycin alone or in combination with other antimicrobials to be effective in the eradication or amelioration of these infections. Noncomparative studies have provided preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of clarithromycin in the treatment of infections of the urogenital tract, oromaxillofacial and ophthalmic areas. However, the promising in vitro and preliminary in vivo activity of clarithromycin against Mycobacterium leprae and Helicobacter pylori warrant further clinical trials to assess its efficacy in patients with these infections. Despite the improved pharmacokinetic profile and in vitro antimicrobial activity of clarithromycin over erythromycin, comparative studies of patients with community-acquired infections reveal the 2 drugs to be of equivalent efficacy. However, clarithromycin demonstrates greater tolerability, principally by inducing fewer gastrointestinal disturbances.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)