Current status and future directions of research on multidrug resistance. The impact of contemporary biotechnology

Investigation of multidrug resistance in cultured human renal cell carcinoma cells by 31P-NMR spectroscopy and treatment survival assays

KTCTL-26 and KTCTL-2 are renal cell carcinoma (RCC) lines with high and low expression of P-170 glycoprotein, respectively. Inherent differences between the two cell lines in terms of phosphate metabolites and growth characteristics in culture were examined for possible association with multidrug resistance (MDR). Differences in response to drug treatment were investigated for 40 h incubations with various doses of vinblastine (VBL) alone or as cotreatments with various concentrations of the calcium antagonist diltiazem (DIL) and/or interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha). Treatment effects were quantitated using the MTT survival assay and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to determine phosphate metabolite profiles in intact cells. KTCTL-2 and KTCTL-26 cells exhibited significant inherent differences in phosphocholine, glycerophosphocholine, glycerophosphoethanolamine, and phosphocreatine levels. KTCTL-26 cells were more sensitive than KTCTL-2 to 0.011 mircroM VBL alone (87% vs. 102% survival) or to 0.011 microM BL + 10 microM DIL (55% vs. 80% survival). The latter treatment resulted in a significant decrease in the ratio of phosphocholine to glycerophosphocholine in KTCTL-26 cells but no significant changes in phosphate metabolites in KTCTL-2 cells. Metabolomic 31P MRS detects different metabolite profiles for RCC cell lines with different MDR phenotypes and may be useful for noninvasive characterization of tumors in a clinical setting.

Chemoresistance of renal cell carcinoma: 1986-1994

Multidrug resistance (MDR) in a variety of human tumors such as renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is thought to be caused by expression of the mdr1 gene and may be reversed by applying chemosensitizers such as Dexverapamil that inhibit the mdr1 gene product P-glycoprotein. On the basis of our preclinical analysis, we initiated a clinical (GCP) study with vinblastine (VBL), the most effective--if at all--chemotherapeutic agent; dexverapamil; and dexamethasone in patients with RCC. All patients had histologically proven RCC that was metastatic and progressive at study entry. The statistical design featured a preliminary study of two cycles of VBL alone followed by tumor evaluation. If no response was documented, with all patients thus serving as their own control, dexverapamil and dexamethasone were added for a minimum of three cycles of combination therapy. Having obtained institutional permission by the ethical review committee (MEC 124, 106-1993/12), we enrolled 24 patients on this protocol starting on May 3, 1993. In the preliminary study, 1 complete response (CR) was achieved with VBL alone, and myelotoxicity led to an adequate dose reduction from 2 mg/m2 VBL per day given as a 5-day continuous infusion (days 1-5) in 6/10 yet evaluable patients to 1.4 mg/m2 per day. In 8/11 yet evaluable patients, dexverapamil doses reached > or = 3000 mg/day by 7-day oral uptake (days 0-6, supported by 20 mg dexamethasone given twice daily), which is significantly higher than those previously reported. The combination of VBL given at 1.4 mg/m2 per day plus, dexverapamil given at 3000 mg per day was felt to be safe and well tolerated. Nine patients were yet evaluable for response. One partial response and three minor responses were noted in this heavily pretreated study population. It appears that this innovative approach may have some activity in RCC and may eventually lead to a rational treatment modality. Careful evaluation in ongoing studies is warranted.