Intra-articular steroids in pauciarticular juvenile chronic arthritis, type 1

Outcomes of intraarticular triamcinolone acetonide injection in children with non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to explore the response to intraarticular triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injection in children with non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and factors associated with time to arthritis flare.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of children with non-systemic JIA who received intraarticular TA injections at a tertiary care hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. Response to intraarticular TA injection was defined as absence of arthritis at 6 months after procedure. Time from joint injection to arthritis flare was recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with logarithmic rank test and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used for outcome analyses.

RESULTS

Intraarticular TA injection was performed in 177 joints among 45 children with non-systemic JIA, most common in the knees (57 joints, 32.2%). Response to intraarticular TA injection at 6 months was observed in 118 joints (66.7%). Ninety-seven joints (54.8%) had arthritis flare following injection. The median time to arthritis flare was 12.65 months (95%CI 8.20-17.10 months). The significant risk factor associated with arthritis flare was the JIA subtypes other than persistent oligoarthritis (HR 2.62, 95%CI 1.085-6.325, p = 0.032); the significant protective factor was concomitant sulfasalazine use (HR 0.326, 95%CI 0.109-0.971, p = 0.044). Adverse effects included pigmentary changes (3, 1.7%) and skin atrophy (2, 1.1%).

CONCLUSION

Intraarticular TA injection in children with non-systemic JIA had favorable response in two thirds of injected joints at 6 months. The JIA subtypes other than persistent oligoarthritis was a predictor of arthritis flare following intraarticular TA injection. Key Points • Intraarticular TA injection in children with non-systemic JIA had a favorable response in two-thirds of injected joints at 6 months. • The median time from intraarticular TA injection to arthritis flare was 12.65 months. • The risk factor predicting arthritis flare was the JIA subtypes other than persistent oligoarthritis (extended oligoarthritis, polyarthritis, ERA, and undifferentiated JIA), while the concomitant use of sulfasalazine was a protective factor. • Local adverse reactions from intraarticular TA injection were less than 2% of injected joints.

Response to treatment with intra-articular triamcinolone hexacetonide and triamcinolone acetonide in oligo articular juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Oligo-articular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (Oligo JIA) is the most common subtype of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Intra-articular corticosteroid (IAC) injection is a mainstay treatment of oligo JIA providing pain relief, improving mobility and preventing further joint destruction in the majority of patients. In 2015, production of triamcinolone hexacetonide (TH) an intra-articular corticosteroid was discontinued in the United States leading to use of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) as an alternative. In this study, we compared response to treatment in children with oligo JIA who underwent therapy with intra-articular TA and TH injection.

METHODS

Our study is a retrospective chart review of children with oligo JIA who were treated with IAC injections with TH between January 2012 and June 2015 and TA between J uly 2015 and December 2018. The two groups were followed at John R. Oishei Children's Hospital of Buffalo and were evaluated for response to treatment, side effects and predictors of response including duration of disease before treatment, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and c-reactive protein (CRP). Response to treatment was defined as at least 6 months follow up without evidence of active arthritis in injected joints. Patients were considered to be non-responders if they continued to show active arthritis during their first follow up after joint injection. The primary objective was to evaluate whether there was a significant difference in rate of response between TH and TA.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients, 38 female and 11 male with oligo JIA were included in the study. The average age was 6.7 years. A total of 111 joints were injected includin g 78 knees, 13 ankles, 9 wrists, 4 hips, 4 elbows, 2 TMJ and one subtalar joint. In the TA group, 49% (29/59) did not show response to injection compared to 27% (14/52) in the TH group. After 6 months, response rates were better for individuals injected with TH compared to TA (73% vs. 51%). In general, response to intra-articular TH was superior to TA with P = .016 using chi-square test of independence. This difference in outcome was not influenced by other variables such as duration of illness before treatment (P value 0.784) or elevated ESR and CRP. No difference in side effects between the two groups were noted.

CONCLUSION

Our results in conjunction with prior published data suggests that TH intra-articular joint injection in oligo JIA is superior to TA, although future controlled trials are necessary for confirmation. An effective, long lasting treatment can have a great impact on the outcome of these children.

Retrospective review of immobilization vs. immediate resumption of activity in patients with Oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis following knee injections

BACKGROUND

Intraarticular corticosteroid injection (IACI) is one of the most common treatments in oligoarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). Activity recommendations following injection vary, as there are no published studies on splinting JIA patients post-IACI (splinting is a form of rest). Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children (TSRH) splints patients post-IACI for 24 h while The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) does not. The aim of this study was to compare the number of cases of recurrent arthritis following IACI between these two post-injection practices.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected at CHOP and TSRH. Patients diagnosed with oligoarticular JIA according to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria (2nd revision, 2001) between 2008 and 2010 were included. Bivariate analysis (Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, chi-squared tests) was run to assess differences in outcomes by site. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox regression was employed to adjust for site differences.

RESULTS

The population at TSRH was younger than at CHOP (p < 0.05) and had more whites (p = 0.03). Disease duration was significantly longer at TSRH than at CHOP (0.40 vs. 0.74 years, p = 0.014). More children were on biologics at the time of injection at CHOP (p < 0.05). The baseline physician global (p < 0.001) was higher at CHOP, as was the joint disease severity (p < 0.001). CHOP had fewer reoccurrences of knee arthritis compared to TSRH: 26% vs 38% (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

The baseline populations were different in that the TSRH group had more whites and Hispanics, were younger and, perhaps, had less severe disease than CHOP. Patients treated with post-injection splinting had a trend toward more arthritis reoccurrence (38% vs. 26%, p = 0.14). Splinting is not clearly beneficial post-injection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This is an observational study, so it is not applicable.

Glucocorticoids in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Glucocorticoid (GC) drugs are a potent and rapidly effective therapeutic option for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). These medications are mainly used for the management of the extra-articular features of systemic-onset disease. A course of low-dose prednisone may be considered for achieving a rapid disease control in patients with severe polyarthritis refractory to other therapies or while awaiting the full therapeutic effect of a recently initiated disease-modifying antirheumatic drug or biologic agent. Short-term systemic GC administration may also be indicated for chronic iridocyclitis unresponsive to topical therapy. The general objective of GC therapy is to limit the maximum dose and exposure to the highest doses to what is needed to achieve disease control, and then to gradually taper the dose until the minimum level sufficient to maintain disease quiescence over time is reached. High-dose intravenous 'pulse' methylprednisolone administration is sometimes chosen to treat the most severe or acute disease manifestations of systemic JIA, particularly macrophage activation syndrome. Intra-articular GC injection is a safe and rapidly effective treatment for synovitis in children with chronic arthritis. Triamcinolone hexacetonide is the optimal GC preparation for pediatric patients. Local injection therapy is used most frequently to treat oligoarthritis, but the strategy of performing multiple injections to induce disease remission, while simultaneously initiating therapy with second-line or biologic agents, has also been proposed for children with polyarticular JIA. Administration of GCs is associated with potentially deleterious adverse effects, some of which can be irreversible. This highlights the need of a judicious use of these medications and careful monitoring of their toxicity. The recently published recommendations for the management of JIA provide useful guidance to the clinicians for the administration of GCs in children with chronic arthritis.

The clinical effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroids for arthritis of the lower limb in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) commonly affects joints of the lower limb including the knee, ankle, subtalar and other foot joints. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACIs) are considered to be effective for short-term relief of synovitis, however, there appears to be a significant lack of published evidence from comparative effectiveness studies. The aim of this study was to identify and critically appraise the evidence for the efficacy of lower limb IACIs in children/adolescents with JIA.

METHODS

Studies were identified in databases Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, PEDro, the Cochrane Library and TRIP, with no date restrictions. The primary search terms 'juvenile idiopathic arthritis', 'lower limb', 'knee'; 'ankle', 'foot' and 'intra-articular steroid injections' and related synonyms were used to develop a comprehensive pragmatic literature search strategy. Included studies were quantitative longitudinal design such as randomised controlled trials, pseudo-randomised and non-randomised experimental studies, cohort studies, and case-control studies. All outcomes measures were subject to analysis. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration criteria with additional criteria for sample population representativeness, quality of statistical analysis and compliant intervention use and presence of co-interventions. Qualitative data synthesis was conducted for the outcome domains. Meta-analyses were not possible as multiple randomised controlled trials for outcome measures were not available. Levels of evidence were assigned to each outcome measure.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by twenty-one studies. One study had high quality for internal validity and nine studies had high quality for external validity. No studies had high quality for both internal and external validity. Four outcome domains were identified. There was weak evidence for IACIs decreasing clinical signs and symptoms in the lower leg, improving joint range of motion, decreasing leg length discrepancy, and for imaging techniques detecting the effects of IACIs.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some weak evidence for the efficacy of IACIs improving certain outcome measures. However, there is also some inconclusive evidence due to a lack of quality studies. More high quality evidence is necessary to definitely determine the efficacy of IACIs for JIA in the lower leg.

2011 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: initiation and safety monitoring of therapeutic agents for the treatment of arthritis and systemic features

Guidelines and recommendations developed and/or endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) are intended to provide guidance for particular patterns of practice and not to dictate the care of a particular patient. The ACR considers adherence to these guidelines and recommendations to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in light of each patient’s individual circumstances. Guidelines and recommendations are intended to promote beneficial or desirable outcomes but cannot guarantee any specific outcome. Guidelines and recommendations developed or endorsed by the ACR are subject to periodic revision as warranted by the evolution of medical knowledge, technology, and practice.

Intra-articular corticosteroid therapy for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: report of an experiential cohort and literature review

The objective of the study to review an experiential cohort of patients receiving IACS and review the associated literature. Review of 121 IACS in 61 patients with JIA. At 3-month intervals, injected joints were evaluated for swelling and range of motion, and the patient and parent were questioned regarding associated pain and morning stiffness. Data were analyzed by log-rank analysis according to injected corticosteroid preparation and its dosage. Adverse events were also recorded. A thorough literature search was done for the literature review. Mean duration of response was 12.5 months (52% of joints in remission at 1 year, 20% after 2 years, and 7% after 3 years). Response was longer with at least 1 mg/kg of corticosteroid, with the longest responses seen with triamcinolone hexacetonide (THA)>triamcinolone acetonide>methylprednisolone. Adverse events were cutaneous atrophy at three injections sites (2.5%), and transient Cushingoid habitus and increased appetite in two patients (3%). Review of the literature generated similar responses to those included herein. Thus, there have been several recommendations for IACS to be a major JIA treatment, and surveys now demonstrate a high level of usage by pediatric rheumatologists. In conclusion the use of IACS in JIA substantiated. THA at a dose of 1-1.5 mg/kg is ideal.

Local effects of intra-articular corticosteroids

Intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IACI) is a very popular procedure. In this review, we wanted to review all that had been published about local effects of IACIs. English literature search was made through PubMed using the terms intra-articular and local effect. Effects on subjective, functional, structural, cellular, humoral, molecular, and imaging aspects were included. Also, all local adverse effects were documented. The main beneficial effect of IACI is pain relief. The duration of this effect is variable and depends on underlying disease, type of disease, amount of structural damage, type of IACI, dose of IACI, presence of joint effusion, level of inflammatory mediators, emptiness of joint effusion, availability of imaging, and others. At large, inflammatory problems had higher rate of favorable response in terms of pain and function. IACI at the knee joint in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients resulted in remission for >6 months in >80% of the patients with a mean duration of approximately 1.2 years, while in the osteoarthritic knee there was a pain relief for 3 weeks only and in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) knee for 8 weeks. There was no joint space loss at the knee joint following multiple IACI in osteoarthritis and also no increase in cartilage or bone erosions in RA following a single IACI. IACI guide imaging is important in achieving better results in particular joints. Joint infection rate is very low. Other adverse effects included intra-articular and periarticular calcifications, cutaneous atrophy, cutaneous depigmentation, avascular necrosis, rapid destruction of the femoral head, acute synovitis, Charcot's arthropathy, tendinopathy, Nicolau's syndrome, and joint dislocation. IACI is associated with a wide range of local effects. Subjective and functional favorable response is prominent mainly in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients. Adverse effects are either rare or insignificant.

Intra-articular corticosteroids in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Safety, efficacy, and features affecting outcome. A comprehensive review of the literature

Intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IACI) has been used in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis in adults for over fifty years. Over the last two decades, IACI has become an important tool in the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), particularly in the oligoarthritis subset of JIA. Many factors may affect the efficacy of this treatment modality, although the majority of evidence on this topic is anecdotal, nonconvincing, or conflicting. The review examines the rationale, efficacy, safety, and application of the use of IACI in the treatment of JIA, focusing on factors that affect the outcome following IACI.

Optimal treatment of knee monarthritis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a decision analysis

OBJECTIVE

To identify the optimal initial treatment strategy for knee monarthritis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) using a decision model and parents' preferences.

METHODS

We utilized a decision analysis model with Markov states and a 6-month multi-attribute outcome with 7 dimensions pertinent to the treatment decision. The 3 most common treatment strategies for knee monarthritis were compared: nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) only, NSAID trial followed by intraarticular corticosteroid injection (IACI) if arthritis was not resolved after 2 months, and initial IACI. Probability estimates for the efficacy and adverse effects of NSAIDs and IACIs were derived from a systematic review of the literature. Parents' preferences for the 7 dimensions of the multi-attribute outcome were elicited by a unique hybrid of the time tradeoff and magnitude estimation techniques. These preferences were then combined with the outcomes of the decision analysis to determine an individual's preferred treatment.

RESULTS

The NSAID trial strategy may avert IACIs in some patients, but at a cost of continued active arthritis. The number of patients that need to be treated with the NSAID trial strategy to avoid a single IACI compared with the initial IACI strategy is 3.8 with an expected additional cost of 6.7 months of active arthritis. Of the 12 parent subjects, 11 (92%) preferred the initial IACI strategy and 1 preferred the NSAID-only strategy. These preferences were not sensitive to model assumptions or probability estimates.

CONCLUSION

Initial IACI appears to be the optimal treatment strategy for knee monarthritis in JIA.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: current and future treatment options

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is the most common rheumatic disease in children. The management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis has improved in recent decades, and morbidity due to the disease is significantly decreased. In particular, the use of more effective drugs and their combination has changed the course of the disease in many patients. The increasing knowledge of inflammation mechanisms has lead to the development of new agents that target specific cytokines interfering with the inflammatory cascade. In particular, anti-TNF agents seem effective: etanercept is the only one licensed for juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and Phase III trials on two other anti-TNF agents, infliximab and adalimumab, are ongoing. This review discusses the current practice in the medical management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and potential new agents are discussed.

Intra-articular steroids and splints/rest for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adults with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Resting or immobilizing a joint to enhance outcomes following intra-articular (IA) steroid injection is generally advocated. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy of IA steroid injections and the influence of post-injection rest.

OBJECTIVES

1. Compare IA steroid injections versus no treatment or placebo. 2. Determine the effects of rest following IA steroid injection in rheumatoid or juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL- Issue 4, 2003), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR - Issue 4, 2003), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE - searched 8.1.04), MEDLINE (1966 to August Week 2 2004), EMBASE (1980 to August Week 2 2004) , CINAHL (1982 to December Week 2 2003), Clinical Trials site of the National Institute of Health, (USA - searched 8.1.04), OTseeker (Occupational Therapy Systematic Evaluation of Evidence - searched 8.1.04) and PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database - searched 8.1.04) were searched. Journals and reference lists were hand searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible were randomised controlled trials of IA steroid injections or of rest following IA steroid injections in rheumatoid or juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Potentially relevant references were evaluated and all data extracted by two independent reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

Five trials (n=346) examining IA steroid injection in the knee joint were included. It was not possible to pool data as outcome measures, timing of follow up and the methods of data reporting differed between trials. There was inconclusive conflicting evidence from two trials that walking time was reduced. There was evidence from one moderate quality trial that pain was reduced at 1-day post-injection (0-100 VAS from 28.33 to 13.46; McGill Pain Scale from 8.89 to 3.96) but not at 1 week or 7-12 weeks post-injection. There is some evidence that IA injections improved knee flexion (by 14 degrees) and reduced knee extension lag (by 20 degrees), knee circumference (median reduction = 0.3 cm) and morning stiffness (reduced from 60 mins to 7.6 mins). One trial (n=91) examined the effects of rest following injection in the knee. The rested group achieved significant improvement in pain, stiffness, knee circumference, and walking time when compared with the non-rested group (no point estimates provided). One trial evaluated rest following injection of the wrist (n=117). Relapse rate was higher in the rested group (rest relapse rate = 24/58, no-rest group = 14/59); but there were no differences between the rested and non-rested groups on pain, joint circumference, wrist function, grip strength or ROM.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence to support the use of IA steroid injections and resting a knee following injections but that wrists should not be rested following injections. The included studies involved adult participants so any conclusions can only cautiously applied to children. Further research is required to examine the use and type of rest and the differential responses of different joints following injections.

Intra-articular corticosteroid injections in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Therapeutic intervention with intra-articular steroid injections in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has evolved from experience with adults with inflammatory joint disease, with the earliest report being published in 1951. The technique has subsequently been introduced into paediatric rheumatology practice, although much of the evidence supporting its use remains anecdotal or based on open, non-controlled studies. This review examines the body of evidence relating to many aspects of treating children with JIA with intra-articular steroids, and is approached from both a medical and a physiotherapy perspective. Where appropriate, important areas for future research are identified and discussed.

The efficacy and safety of intraarticular corticosteroid therapy for coxitis in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy and safety of intraarticular triamcinolone hexacetonide (IATH) for the treatment of coxitis in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA).

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients with JRA and coxitis were studied prospectively. Forty-eight children received IATH in 67 arthritic hips. The remaining 2 children exhibited 3 cases of femoral head necrosis (FHN) at the initial assessment and were only followed up; both were receiving long-term systemic steroids. After a minimum of 2 years, the study was concluded with a final evaluation that included magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

In 39 of 67 hip joints (58%), remission of the coxitis for a period of 2 years was obtained through a single administration of IATH, while another 12 hip joints showed remission of coxitis after repeated TH injections (total remission rate 76%). We observed 2 patients with FHN following IATH. Both of these children were receiving long-term systemic steroids. During the period between onset of JRA and screening assessment for this study, the children exhibited 2.4 cases of FHN per 100 patient-years, while 1.5 cases of FHN per 100 patient-years were observed between IATH treatment and final followup. All 5 observed cases of FHN occurred among the 20 children who received long-term systemic steroids, while no necrosis occurred in the 30 children who did not receive systemic corticosteroids (P = 0.009 by Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSION

IATH for juvenile rheumatoid coxitis was an effective treatment that did not increase the rate of FHN. Systemic steroids, however (or their covariable, severity of JRA), may increase the risk of FHN in JRA.

Etanercept in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To review the classification, pathophysiology, safety, and efficacy of treatment options for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). Etanercept, the agent most recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in JRA, is featured.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were identified from a search of the MEDLINE database (1966 to January 2000) and through secondary sources. Meeting abstracts and posters were also evaluated.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Articles identified and retrieved from data sources were evaluated and, if determined to be relevant, were included in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

JRA represents a major cause of functional disability in children. In contrast to traditional therapeutic agents for JRA, which act through generalized antiinflammatory activity or generalized immunosuppression, new therapeutic modalities have been developed that target specific molecules involved in the pathophysiology of JRA. Etanercept inhibits the activity of tumor necrosis factor and lymphotoxin-alpha. In a clinical trial of patients with polyarticular-course JRA, etanercept-treated patients experienced less pain and swelling in their joints, decreased incidence of disease activity, less frequent flare, and a longer time to flare than patients receiving placebo. Treatment with etanercept was generally well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Etanercept represents an exciting new therapeutic option for the treatment of JRA. The positioning of etanercept among other therapeutic options for JRA will be more clearly established as additional safety and efficacy data are made available.

Prevention of leg length discrepancy in young children with pauciarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis by treatment with intraarticular steroids

OBJECTIVE

To determine if intraarticular (i.a.) injection of triamcinolone hexacetonide (steroids) used early in the course of pauciarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (pauci JRA) is associated with less leg length discrepancy (LLD) or thigh circumference discrepancy (TCD).

METHODS

Children with pauci JRA who had asymmetric lower-extremity arthritis diagnosed before age 7 years in Seattle, Washington (WA; n = 16) and in Chapel Hill and Durham, North Carolina (NC; n = 14) were retrospectively identified. WA children were given i.a. steroids within 2 months of diagnosis; the injections were repeated if synovitis recurred in the same joint or in a different joint. These children were compared with NC children who were not treated with i.a. steroids. Thigh circumference was measured at 10 cm above the patella, and leg length was measured from the anterior superior iliac spine to the mid-medial malleolus, by a single observer. LLD and TCD are reported as the percentage of difference between leg measurements in each subject.

RESULTS

The WA and NC subjects had comparable disease severity and duration of followup (in months). Twelve WA children had subsequent i.a. steroid injections (mean 3.25 injections per child over mean +/- SD 42 +/- 11 months). The WA subjects had significantly less LLD (P = 0.005, by Student's 2-sided t-test) and prescriptions for shoe lifts (P = 0.002, by Fisher's 2-sided exact test). There was not a significant difference in TCD between the 2 groups (P = 0.139, by Student's 2-sided t-test). Similar findings were obtained when the analysis was limited to children with monarticular knee arthritis.

CONCLUSION

Early and continued use of i.a. steroids may be associated with less LLD in young children with pauci JRA. This may indicate decreased duration of synovitis.

Intraarticular corticosteroid injection in the management of children with chronic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Intraarticular (IA) corticosteroid injection is a common therapeutic approach in the management of adult rheumatoid arthritis. This study examined the safety and efficacy of IA corticosteroid injection in 71 patients with juvenile arthritis who were being seen at the Sheba Medical Center during the years 1991-1996.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the diagnosis of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA), 6 patients had reactive arthritis, and 4 patients had various other arthritic conditions. The mean +/- SD age was 9.4 +/- 5.6 years (range 0.5-18 years); 47 were female (mean age 8.1 +/- 5.5 years) and 24 were male (mean age 10.8 +/- 5.4 years). A total of 300 joints were injected with triamcinolone hexacetonide. The most common sites of injection were the knees (124 injections), ankles (71 injections), wrists (46 injections), shoulders (10 injections), and elbows (7 injections). Children under the age of 6 (n = 17), or older children who received more than 4 joint injections at one time (n = 10) were sedated with either ketamine HCI or propofol. All other children received their joint injections under local anesthesia.

RESULTS

Full remission of the joint inflammation lasting >6 months following injection was achieved in 246 of the 300 injections (82.0%). In 54 (18.0%) of the injected joints, the inflammation recurred within 6 months of injection. In patients with pauciarticular arthritis, 115 of 141 injections (81.6%) resulted in full remission. Discontinuation of all oral medications was accomplished in 43 patients (60.6%) of the total group of 71 patients and in 32 of the 43 patients with pauciarticular disease (74.4%). Correction of joint contraction was achieved in 42 children (55 joints). In all 11 patients with Baker's cyst and in 12 patients with tenosynovitis, complete remission was achieved following injection. No infection or other serious complications occurred in any of the patients following the procedure.

CONCLUSION

IA corticosteroid joint injection in children with juvenile arthritis is a safe and effective mode of therapy. It may be the only therapy needed in patients with pauciarticular JRA, obviating the need for prolonged oral medications, and is effective in correcting joint contractions and deformities.

Juvenile arthritis with oligoarticular onset

Patients with oligoarticular onset of juvenile arthritis form a large group that is heterogeneous with regard to clinical presentation, further evolution and outcome. The three established subgroups do not cover the whole patient population and are not always easily distinguishable at onset. Therefore, the outcome of children with oligoarticular onset is still, on the whole, unpredictable. Treatment has been very conservative, but, as part of it, the use of intra-articular corticosteroids is increasing and should be encouraged. The question of whether to give slow-acting anti-rheumatic drugs is a difficult one, as these have neither been studied nor recommended for use in persistently oligoarticular patients.

Intra-articular corticosteroids. Guide to selection and indications for use

Physicians have used intra- and periarticular corticosteroids for treating a variety of rheumatic diseases for nearly 50 years. Yet publications that have carefully examined the mechanisms of action, the pharmacokinetics and the comparative safety and efficacy of the available agents are sparse. This limits our ability to choose a drug scientifically. Similarly, we know little about the long term outcomes of joints infected with corticosteroids versus those not injected. Highly branched esters of methylprednisolone or triamcinolone are the preferred agents used by American rheumatologists. Pharmacokinetic studies reveal that triamcinolone hexacetonide, the least soluble of all the corticosteroid esters, is retained in the joint for 2 to 3 weeks. Intra-articular corticosteroids may implement their anti-inflammatory effect by down-regulating genetic expression of several pro-inflammatory proteins. A literature review suggests that judicious use of intra- and periarticular corticosteroids is very helpful in temporarily reducing pain and inflammation in musculoskeletal structures and may facilitate increased motion and function in selected cases. Their use in juvenile arthritis also appears to be safe and beneficial. Infection in or about the joint in the chief contraindication to use. Adverse effects are very few but the number of injections per joint should probably be limited to 4 or less per year.

Drug treatment in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Past, present, and future

Rheumatology made its debut as a legitimate subspecialty of pediatrics sometime in the 1940s in Europe, and in the 1970s in North America. Therapy of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis has evolved from salicylates and gold injections to newer, less toxic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and methotrexate. Corticosteroids remain as important drugs when life-threatening complications or blinding iridocyclitis develop. Immune response modifiers and gene therapies offer considerable potential for eventually halting or curing the disease but have yet to make a substantial impact on therapy. Methods for the correct conduct and interpretation of data from clinical trials are discussed.

Teenager with an irritable hip, anaemia and malaise

We have described a boy with a juvenile spondyloarthropathy who also showed inflammatory changes in the gut. Gastrointestinal symptoms initially indicated the presence of an inflammatory bowel disease, but this was excluded histopathologically.

Intraarticular corticosteroids for chronic arthritis in children: efficacy and effects on cartilage and growth

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and effects on cartilage and statural growth of intraarticular corticosteroid (IAS) therapy for chronic arthritis in children and adolescents.

METHODS

We examined 21 children and adolescents with chronic arthritis (median duration, 8 months) that did not respond to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. The 21 joints injected with triamcinolone-hexacetonide were examined before and 7 weeks after IAS therapy by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; 14 joints were also examined 13 months after IAS therapy.

RESULTS

All joints treated with IAS had improvement. Magnetic resonance imaging showed long-lasting suppression of inflammation and pannus without evidence of toxic effects on cartilage. Statural growth was not affected.

CONCLUSION

In experienced hands, IAS therapy may be a safe and effective tool in the treatment of chronic arthritis in childhood. Long-term follow-up is mandatory.

Pediatric rheumatic diseases

The rheumatic diseases of childhood are a relatively common and extraordinarily diverse group of illnesses; nevertheless, they are at least distantly related by similarities of immunodysregulation. These pathophysiologic relationships are reflected in affected children in similarities of historical, physical, and laboratory data as well as therapeutic intervention.