Early regression of left ventricular diastolic abnormalities in hypertensive patients treated with nifedipine

Physical performance is preserved after regression of left ventricular hypertrophy

Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy has been shown to improve left ventricular diastolic function in elderly patients with hypertension, but little is known about whether this affects physical performance. Left ventricular mass, cardiac function at rest and during submaximal exercise, and physical performance were assessed in 38 elderly patients with hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy and normal systolic function before and after 8 and 14 months of therapy with amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide or both. Blood pressure control was achieved with amlodipine in 18 patients, with hydrochlorothiazide in seven, and with the combination of these drugs in 13. Left ventricular mass index was similarly reduced from approximately 150 to approximately 100 g/m2 at 14 months' in each treatment group. Systolic function was maintained with the three treatment regimens, whereas similar decreases in time to peak filling rate and increases in first-third filling fraction occurred both at rest and during submaximal exercise after 8 months and further after 14 months of therapy. Exercise capacity did not significantly change in the group as a whole, but individual changes in peak oxygen uptake at the end of treatment correlated significantly with the decrease in time to peak filling rate during submaximal exercise (r = -0.49; p < 0.01). It is concluded that long-term blood pressure control with amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide or both is associated with significant reductions in left ventricular mass and improved diastolic function in elderly patients with hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy. Despite this reduction in left ventricular mass, left ventricular systolic function and physical performance are well preserved during submaximal exercise.

Left ventricular diastolic function during adrenergic stress in essential hypertension: acute and chronic effects of ACE inhibition

We studied the changes in left ventricular (LV) diastolic function induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition at rest and during adrenergic stimulation and their relation to blood pressure (BP) variations to determine whether reductions in the renin-angiotensin system may improve diastolic function irrespective of BP reduction. Echocardiographic indices of systolic and diastolic function, plasma catecholamines as estimated by high-pressure liquid chromatography, and BP variations (Dynamap) were determined at rest and during the cold pressor test (CPT) before and 6 hours and 20 days after ACE inhibition (lisinopril), 20 mg/day by mouth in 10 subjects with uncomplicated essential hypertension. Blood Pressure was significantly reduced after both 6 hours and 20 days of therapy. The cold pressor test induced similar increases in BP in both basal conditions and after acute and chronic treatment. Catecholamine levels were unchanged by the therapy. Systolic function, evaluated by fractional shortening, ejection fraction, and systolic dV/dt, was normal and unchanged during CPT and after treatment. Diastolic function, assessed by volume curve analysis, showed a reduced percentage contribution of rapid filling to total diastolic filling, an increase in the contribution of the atrial systole, and an increase in the isovolumetric relaxation time. During CPT these parameters deteriorated further in response to increased afterload. Lisinopril therapy induced significant increases in end-diastolic volume (p < 0.005) with a progressive increase in the rapid filling dV/dt (p < 0.005 at rest; p < 0.001 during CPT) and a reduction in isovolumetric relaxation (p < 0.0001 at rest and p < 0.01 during CPT). The correlation between systolic BP (afterload) and the rapid filling dV/dt, both at rest and during CPT, was modified by treatment with the ACE inhibitor, with significantly higher rapid filling dV/dt values, and with the pressure loads equal (reduction of the slope and rightward shift of the correlation line). The improvement in diastolic function achieved by ACE inhibition at rest and during CPT appears unrelated to plasma catecholamines and only partly ascribable to the reduced pressure load. The tissue angiotensin II reduction might by itself improve the myocardial response to the pressure load and adrenergic stimulation.

Normalization of cardiac structure and function after regression of cardiac hypertrophy

Previous studies have shown regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after pharmacologic treatment of hypertensive patients; however, the impact of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy on systolic function and on left and right ventricular diastolic function remains controversial and is difficult to assess because previous studies have not included concurrently studied age-matched control groups. Left ventricular mass, systolic function, and left and right ventricular diastolic function were assessed in 27 hypertensive patients, aged 43 +/- 6 years, by echocardiographic and Doppler studies before and 1, 3, 5, and 7 months after treatment. Left ventricular mass and ventricular function were concurrently evaluated in 27 age-matched normotensive subjects. Treatment with antihypertensive agents resulted in a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in diastolic blood pressure of 15 mmHg, measured at 1 month and sustained throughout the study. In response to hemodynamic unloading, left ventricular mass index decreased from 129 +/- 30 gm/m2 at baseline to 105 +/- 26 (p < 0.05) and 88 +/- 14 gm/m2 (p < 0.05) at 1 and 3 months of treatment, respectively, and remained unchanged over the subsequent 4 months. After 3 months of treatment, left ventricular mass index was similar in treated hypertensive and control subjects. Systolic function, assessed in terms of the relationship between shortening fraction and end-systolic wall stress, was unchanged throughout the treatment period and was no different from that in control subjects. However, patients with an initially depressed shortening fraction experienced a greater increase in shortening fraction during treatment compared to those with an initially normal shortening fraction (11% +/- 4% vs 5% +/- 5%, p < 0.01) and showed an improvement in the relationship between shortening fraction and end-systolic wall stress during treatment. Ventricular filling dynamics improved during the first 3 months of treatment, after which they were unchanged. Ventricular filling dynamics were similar in treated hypertensive patients and control subjects. In conclusion, sustained hemodynamic unloading of the left ventricle results in normalization of left ventricular mass, systolic function, and left and right ventricular diastolic filling dynamics, compared to those in age-matched control subjects.

Effects of long-term treatment with sustained-release nicardipine on left ventricular hypertrophy and function in patients with essential hypertension

The effects of long-term treatment with sustained-release nicardipine (nicardipine SR) on left ventricular hypertrophy and function were studied. Ten uncomplicated essential hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, aged 61 +/- 7.6 years old, were treated with nicardipine SR alone for an average of 20 months (range: 12-26 months). All patients underwent echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular diameters and function before and after the treatment. At the end of the treatment, systolic and diastolic blood pressures significantly decreased from 176.0 +/- 13.9 to 140.0 +/- 14.3 mm Hg and from 97.0 +/- 5.3 to 77.4 +/- 7.2 mm Hg, respectively (each P < 0.01), while heart rate did not change (73.8 +/- 14.6 vs. 69.9 +/- 13.5 beats/min). The left ventricular mass index significantly decreased from 132.1 +/- 14.4 to 114.4 +/- 15.7 g/m2 (P < 0.01) due to significant reductions in both interventricular septal thickness (P < 0.01) and left ventricular posterior wall thickness (P < 0.05). The ejection fraction (EF), fractional shortening (FS), peak shortening rate (PSR), and peak lengthening rate (PLR) were also improved significantly by the treatment (EF and FS, P < 0.05; PSR and PLR, P < 0.01). Significant inverse relationships existed between end-systolic wall stress and peak shortening or lengthening rate before the treatment (r = 0.80, P < 0.05; r = 0.86, P < 0.05, respectively). These relationships were unchanged after the treatment. Nicardipine SR reduced left ventricular hypertrophy and improved both left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions without causing any consistent augmentation of intrinsic left ventricular function in essential hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.

Hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: is drug therapy beneficial?

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a consequence of long-standing hypertension and is considered to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Several antihypertensive agents are capable of inducing regression of LVH, but it is not known which class of drugs is most effective. The impact of drug-induced reversal of hypertrophy on ventricular function remains a controversial issue. Furthermore, the long-term clinical benefits of LVH regression have yet to be documented. Controversies also exist regarding the clinical outcomes associated with drug-induced LVH regression.

Efficacy and safety of calcium channel blockers in hypertensive patients with concomitant left ventricular dysfunction

The use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in the treatment of hypertension and concomitant left ventricular dysfunction is reviewed. Some CCBs, particularly second-generation dihydropyridine agents such as felodipine, isradipine, nicardipine, nimodipine, and nitrendipine, have properties that enhance their usefulness in these patients. All CCBs have a similar mechanism of action. Differences in their selective action at various tissue sites determine which are most appropriate for patients with concomitant hypertension and left ventricular dysfunction. Most CCBs do not produce reflex stimulation of the heart or induce intravascular expansion. While all CCBs produce arteriolar dilation, all local beds and regional circulations in target organs are not affected equally. Most CCBs can decrease cardiac mass, and second-generation CCBs tend to have little or no negative inotropic effects at therapeutic dosages. In addition, they increase blood flow and reduce myocardial oxygen requirements. Because of differences in functional and electrophysiologic effects, specific CCBs may not be appropriate for all patients. Since second-generation dihydropyridine CCBs lack clinically relevant negative inotropic effects, and have been shown to improve exercise tolerance and coronary artery perfusion, they are appropriate for hypertensive patients with left ventricular dysfunction, angina, and coronary heart disease. Second-generation CCBs tend to lack cardiodepressant side effects and are less likely to react with digoxin than are first-generation CCBs.