Chasing the elusive animal model of late-phase bronchoconstriction: studies in dogs, guinea pigs and rats

Optimisation of the sensitisation conditions for an ovalbumin challenge model of asthma

Antigen inhalation in patients with atopic asthma results in an early asthmatic response (EAR), accompanied by a late asthmatic response (LAR) in 60% of patients, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and inflammatory cell infiltration to the lungs. An ideal animal model of asthma should, therefore, provide at least these 4 features consistently and reproducibly. The aim of this study was to optimise the ovalbumin (OA) sensitisation conditions, for achieving EAR, LAR, AHR and cell influx, in a guinea-pig model of asthma. Animals were sensitised with 10 micro g or 100 micro g OA, as either a single or booster (day 1 and day 5) injection. Airway responses to inhaled OA (10 micro g, 1 h) of actively sensitised, conscious guinea pigs were determined by whole body plethysmography as the change in specific airways conductance (sG(aw)) over a 12 h period and at 24 h. Bronchoconstriction by inhaled histamine (1 mM) was used to investigate AHR, and inflammatory cell influx was determined by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), both at 24 h post-challenge. A single sensitisation with 10 micro g OA did not reveal an EAR, LAR or AHR following exposure to OA. However, total and differential cell counts (eosinophils and macrophages) were significantly greater 24 h post-challenge, when compared to saline-challenged sensitised animals. The addition of a booster injection of 10 micro g revealed an EAR, but no LAR or AHR after ovalbumin inhalation. However, there was a significant cell influx. Sensitisation with 100 micro g OA (single and booster injections) revealed all four parameters of the asthmatic response (EAR, LAR, AHR and cell influx). The incorporation of the booster sensitisation injection resulted in a prolongation of the LAR, and the AHR was more pronounced and cell influx increased significantly, when compared to all other sensitisation protocols. Thus, sensitisation with 100 micro g OA (with a booster injection) can reveal an EAR, LAR, AHR and cell influx following inhalation exposure to OA (10 micro g). Cellular infiltration to the lung may be a poor marker of the asthmatic response, as a threshold level of cell influx (eosinophils) appears to be required in order to elicit the LAR and AHR. There was an association between the LAR and AHR.

Effect of dexamethasone and endogenous corticosterone on airway hyperresponsiveness and eosinophilia in the mouse

1. Mice were sensitized by 7 intraperitoneal injections of ovalbumin without adjuvant (10 micrograms in 0.5 ml of sterile saline) on alternate days and after 3 weeks exposed to either ovalbumin (2 mg ml-1 in sterile saline) or saline aerosol for 5 min on 8 consecutive days. One day before the first challenge, animals were injected intraperitoneally on a daily basis with vehicle (0.25 ml sterile saline), dexamethasone (0.5 mg kg-1) or metyrapone (30 mg kg-1). 2. In vehicle-treated ovalbumin-sensitized animals ovalbumin challenge induced a significant increase of airway responsiveness to metacholine both in vitro (27%, P < 0.05) and in vivo (40%, P < 0.05) compared to saline-challenged mice. Virtually no eosinophils could be detected after saline challenge, whereas the numbers of eosinophils were significantly increased (P < 0.01) at both 3 and 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge (5.48 +/- 3.8 x 10(3) and 9.13 +/- 1.7 x 10(3) cells, respectively). Furthermore, a significant increase in ovalbumin-specific immunoglobulin E level (583 +/- 103 units ml-1, P < 0.05) was observed after ovalbumin challenge compared to saline challenge (201 +/- 38 units ml-1). 3. Plasma corticosterone level was significantly reduced (-92%, P < 0.001) after treatment with metyrapone. Treatment with metyrapone significantly increased eosinophil infiltration (17.4 +/- 9.93 x 10(3) and 18.7 +/- 2.57 x 10(3) cells, P < 0.05 at 3 h and 24 h, respectively) and potentiated airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine compared to vehicle-treated ovalbumin-challenged animals. Dexamethasone inhibited both in vitro and in vivo hyperresponsiveness as well as antigen-induced infiltration of eosinophils (0, P < 0.05 and 0.7 +/- 0.33 x 10(3) cells, P < 0.05 at 3 h and 24 h, respectively). Metyrapone as well as dexamethasone did not affect the increase in ovalbumin-specific immunoglobulin E levels after ovalbumin challenge (565 +/- 70 units/ml-1; P < 0.05; 552 +/- 48 units ml-1, P < 0.05 respectively). 4. From these data it can be concluded that exogenously applied corticosteroids can inhibit eosinophil infiltration as well as airway hyperresponsiveness. Vise versa, endogenously produced corticosteroids play a down-regulating role on the induction of both eosinophil infiltration and airway hyperresponsiveness.

Early and late phase bronchoconstrictions in conscious sensitized guinea-pigs after macro- and microshock inhalation of allergen and associated airway accumulation of leukocytes

Guinea-pigs were sensitized by i.p. injection of 10 micrograms OA and 100 mg aluminium hydroxide in 1 ml normal saline. Fourteen to twenty-one days after sensitization, animals were exposed to macroshock (1% OA for 2 min) or microshock (0.01% for 60 min) inhalation challenges with OA. Animals were protected against fatal anaphylaxis in the case of macroshocks with mepyramine (30mg/kg i.p.) 30 min before exposure. Specific airway conductance (sGaw) was measured in conscious animals by whole body plethysmography at intervals up to 72 h after challenge. An early phase bronchoconstriction peaked significantly (P < 0.05) at 15 min after both macroshock and microshock OA exposures, with maximum falls in sGaw of 70.8 +/- 3.8 and -40.0 +/- 5.9%, respectively. These had resolved after 5 h. A late phase bronchoconstriction peaked variably between 17 and 24 h: the mean peak falls in sGaw after the macro- and microshock challenges were significantly different from baseline (P < 0.05), at -21.6 +/- 3.7 and -38.0 +/- 3.9%, respectively. Control exposures of OA-sensitized guinea-pigs to saline for either 2 or 60 min, in place of OA, produced no significant variation in sGaw values over the predicted early and late phases. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) performed at 5 or 24 h after OA challenge revealed significant increases in total cell numbers (P < 0.05) at 5 and 24 h after the OA macroshock challenge and at 24 h after the microshock, compared with saline challenges. Differential cell counts showed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in the proportion of neutrophils at 5 h and of neutrophils and eosinophils at 24 h after the macroshock exposure to OA, compared with saline controls. A significant (P < 0.05) increase in the proportion of eosinophils also occurred in BAL fluid at 24 h after microshock OA challenge. Neutrophils, however, did not alter at 24 h, yet a late phase bronchoconstriction was recorded. Thus, macroshock (with mepyramine cover) and microshock (without mepyramine cover) OA challenges result in both early and late phase bronchoconstrictions. The late phase is associated with influx of eosinophils in both models but neutrophils only appear after the macroshock, indicating that late phase responses may not involve neutrophil infiltration to the airways.