Improved stabilization of conventional (Brooke) ileostomies with the stapler technique

Surgical management of ostomy complications: a MISSTO-WSES mapping review

BACKGROUND

The creation of an ileostomy or colostomy is a common surgical event, both in elective and in emergency context. The main aim of stoma creation is to prevent postoperative complications, such as the anastomotic leak. However, stoma-related complications can also occur and their morbidity is not negligible, with a rate from 20 to 70%. Most stomal complications are managed conservatively, but, when this approach is not resolutive, surgical treatment becomes necessary. The aim of this mapping review is to get a comprehensive overview on the incidence, the risk factors, and the management of the main early and late ostomy complications: stoma necrosis, mucocutaneous separation, stoma retraction, stoma prolapse, parastomal hernia, stoma stenosis, and stoma bleeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A complete literature research in principal databases (PUBMED, EMBASE, SCOPUS and COCHRANE) was performed by Multidisciplinary Italian Study group for STOmas (MISSTO) for each topic, with no language restriction and limited to the years 2011-2021. An international expert panel, from MISSTO and World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), subsequently reviewed the different issues, endorsed the project, and approved the final manuscript.

CONCLUSION

Stoma-related complications are common and require a step-up management, from conservative stoma care to surgical stoma revision. A study of literature evidence in clinical practice for stoma creation and an improved management of stoma-related complications could significantly increase the quality of life of patients with ostomy. Solid evidence from the literature about the correct management is lacking, and an international consensus is needed to draw up new guidelines on this subject.

Three-point stapled fixation technique to manage ileostomy spout retraction

This paper details a technique to manage non-fixed stomal retraction using a using a non-cutting linear stapler.

Peritonitis following stapling of a flush ileostomy

Peritonitis following staple stabilization of a flush ileostomy has not yet been reported in the literature. We report a case of iatrogenic injury to a loop of the ileum in an unrecognized parastomal hernia which caused peritonitis after stapling of a flush ileostomy.

Ileostomy revision using noncutting linear stapler

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate the outcome of ileostomy revision for retraction and prolapse using noncutting linear stapler.

METHOD

Forty five patients undergoing a total of 94 stapled revisions between 1.1.1995 and 31.12.2005 were identified by the unique code for stomal revision. Medical records for all patients were examined.

RESULTS

Thirty-five (77.8%) of the 45 patients were women. In 43 (95.6%), the indication was stomal retraction. Median follow-up was 28 months (2-122). One or more stapling procedures resulted in a normal stoma at follow-up in 18 (41.9%) of 43 patients treated for stomal retraction. When other types of repair were included, a normal stoma was achieved in 30 (69.8%) of 43 patients. Patients with a low BMI had the lowest success rate (44%), but none of the possible factors analysed for influence on success had a statistically significant impact. Two patients were treated for prolapse, and both needed other types of revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Stapled ileostomy revision is easy to perform and has a low morbidity. Less than half the patients achieve a satisfactory long-term result after one or more stapling procedures. Many patients still benefit from other types of revision when stapling has failed.