A 2-year follow up of babies enrolled in a European multicentre trial of porcine surfactant replacement for severe neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Collaborative European Multicentre Study Group

A unique story in neonatal research: the development of a porcine surfactant

Surfactant deficiency was identified as the cause of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) as long ago as 1959. Trials of surfactant replacement in the 1960s were unsuccessful because the preparations used contained only phospholipids and they were administered inefficiently by nebulization. In the 1970s Bengt Robertson and Göran Enhörning showed that natural surfactant, containing both phospholipids and proteins, could ameliorate the signs of RDS in immature rabbits. In the 1980s Bengt Robertson and Tore Curstedt developed a porcine surfactant, Curosurf (named after their surnames), which was effective in immature animals and was used in a pilot clinical trial beginning in 1983. Subsequent randomized clinical trials were planned a year later by Bengt Robertson, Tore Curstedt and Henry Halliday, and the first trial was begun in 1985. This showed that Curosurf reduced pulmonary air leaks and neonatal mortality in preterm infants with severe RDS. A second trial, coordinated by Christian Speer, demonstrated that multiple doses of Curosurf were more effective than a single dose. Subsequent trials conducted by the Collaborative European Multicenter Study Group, which included among others Guilio Bevilacqua, Janna Koppe, Ola Saugstad, Nils Svenningsen and Jean-Pierre Relier, showed that early treatment was more effective than later administration and that infants treated at birth had similar neurodevelopmental status to untreated controls at a corrected age of 2 years. Members of the Collaborative European Multicenter Study Group in Denmark and Sweden performed studies to demonstrate the benefits of a combination of surfactant treatment and early continuous positive airway pressure. Curosurf has also been compared with several synthetic and natural surfactants, and at a dose of 200 mg/kg Curosurf has been shown to be superior to either Survanta or Curosurf used at a dose of 100 mg/kg. Recently, new-generation synthetic surfactants containing both phospholipids and proteins have been developed. After preclinical testing, CHF5633 (developed by Tore Curstedt and Jan Johansson in collaboration with Chiesi Farmaceutici) has undergone a preliminary first study in humans under the guidance of Christian Speer. If effective, this new surfactant preparation could revolutionize the treatment of preterm infants worldwide as it could be made consistently and safely in almost unlimited quantities. This story of a porcine surfactant preparation has been truly remarkable, and many thousands of preterm babies worldwide are now alive and well because of it.

Surfactant

Exogenous pulmonary surfactant, widely used in neonatal care, is one of the best-studied treatments in neonatology, and its introduction in the 1990s led to a significant improvement in neonatal outcomes in preterm infants, including a decrease in mortality. This chapter provides an overview of surfactant composition and function in health and disease and summarizes the evidence for its clinical use.

Animal derived surfactant extract for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is caused by a deficiency or dysfunction of pulmonary surfactant. A wide variety of surfactant products have been formulated and studied in clinical trials. These include synthetic surfactants and animal derived surfactant extracts. Trials of surfactant replacement have either tried to prevent the development of respiratory distress in high-risk premature infants or treat established respiratory distress in premature infants.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of administration of animal derived surfactant extract on mortality, chronic lung disease and other morbidities associated with prematurity in preterm infants with established respiratory distress syndrome. Subgroup analysis were planned according to the specific surfactant product, the degree of prematurity, and the severity of disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from 1975 through December 2008. In addition, searches were made of previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants and journal hand searching in the English language.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized or quazi-randomized controlled trials that compared the effect of animal derived surfactant extract treatment administered to infants with established respiratory distress syndrome in order to prevent complications of prematurity and mortality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data regarding clinical outcomes were excerpted from the reports of the clinical trials by the review authors. Data analysis was done in accordance with the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. The studies demonstrated an initial improvement in respiratory status (improved oxygenation and decreased need for ventilator support). The meta-analysis supports a significant decrease in the risk of any air leak (typical relative risk 0.47, 95% CI 0.39, 0.58; typical risk difference -0.16, 95% CI -0.21, -0.12), pneumothorax (typical relative risk 0.42, 95% CI 0.34, 0.52; typical risk difference -0.17, 95% CI -0.21, -0.13), and a significant decrease in the risk of pulmonary interstitial emphysema (typical relative risk 0.45, 95% CI 0.37, 0.55; typical risk difference -0.20, 95% CI -0.25, -0.15). There is a significant decrease in the risk of neonatal mortality (typical relative risk 0.68, 95% CI 0.57, 0.82; typical risk difference -0.09, 95% CI -0.13, -0.05), a significant decrease in the risk of mortality prior to hospital discharge (typical relative risk 0.63, 95% CI 0.44, 0.90; typical risk difference -0.10, 95% CI -0.18, -0.03) and a significant decrease in the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) or death at 28 days of age (typical relative risk 0.83, 95% CI 0.77, 0.90; typical risk difference -0.11, 95 CI -0.16, -0.06). No differences are reported in the risk of patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, BPD or retinopathy of prematurity.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Infants with established respiratory distress syndrome who receive animal derived surfactant extract treatment have a decreased risk of pneumothorax, a decreased risk of pulmonary interstitial emphysema, a decreased risk of mortality, and a decreased risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death.

Surfactant-replacement therapy for respiratory distress in the preterm and term neonate

Respiratory failure secondary to surfactant deficiency is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Surfactant therapy substantially reduces mortality and respiratory morbidity for this population. Secondary surfactant deficiency also contributes to acute respiratory morbidity in late-preterm and term neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome, pneumonia/sepsis, and perhaps pulmonary hemorrhage; surfactant replacement may be beneficial for these infants. This statement summarizes indications, administration, formulations, and outcomes for surfactant-replacement therapy. The impact of antenatal steroids and continuous positive airway pressure on outcomes and surfactant use in preterm infants is reviewed. Because respiratory insufficiency may be a component of multiorgan dysfunction, preterm and term infants receiving surfactant-replacement therapy should be managed in facilities with technical and clinical expertise to administer surfactant and provide multisystem support.

One-year follow-up of very preterm infants who received lucinactant for prevention of respiratory distress syndrome: results from 2 multicenter randomized, controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The benefits of exogenous surfactants for prevention or treatment of respiratory distress syndrome are well established, but there is a paucity of long-term follow-up data from surfactant-comparison trials.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine and compare survival and pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcomes through 1 year corrected age of preterm infants who received lucinactant and other surfactants in the SELECT (Safety and Effectiveness of Lucinactant Versus Exosurf in a Clinical Trial) and STAR (Surfaxin Therapy Against Respiratory Distress Syndrome) trials individually and, secondarily, from analysis using combined data from these 2 trials.

METHODS

All infants from both trials who were randomly assigned to administration of lucinactant (175 mg/kg), colfosceril palmitate (67.5 mg/kg), beractant (100 mg/kg), or poractant alfa (175 mg/kg) were prospectively followed through 1 year corrected age, at which point masked assessment of outcomes was performed for surviving infants. One-year survival was a key outcome of interest. Other parameters assessed included rates of rehospitalization and respiratory morbidity and gross neurologic status. Data were analyzed by comparing the different surfactants within each trial and, in secondary analysis, combining data from both trials to compare lucinactant versus the animal-derived surfactants (beractant and poractant) used in these trials. Survival rates over time were compared by using the Wilcoxon test for survival through 1 year corrected age and logistic regression for comparison of fixed time points. The latter analyses were performed by using the prespecified approach, where loss to follow-up or withdrawal of consent was imputed as a death, and also using raw data. Other outcomes were analyzed by using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test or logistic regression for categorical data, and analysis of variance on ranks was used for continuous data.

RESULTS

Very few cases were lost to follow-up in either trial (29 of 1546 enrolled in both trials [1.9%]). In the primary analysis of the SELECT trial comparing lucinactant to either colfosceril or beractant, there were no significant differences in the proportion of infants who were alive through 1 year corrected age. Fixed-time-point estimates of mortality at 1 year corrected age imputing loss to follow-up as a death were 28.1% for lucinactant, 31.0% for colfosceril, and 31.0% for beractant. By using raw data without imputing loss to follow-up as a death, mortality estimates at 1 year corrected age were computed to be 26.6%, 29.1%, and 28.3%, respectively. In the primary analysis of the STAR trial, significantly more infants treated with lucinactant were alive through 1 year corrected age compared with those who received poractant alfa. Fixed time estimates of mortality at 1 year corrected age imputing loss to follow-up as a death were 19.4% for lucinactant and 24.2% for poractant. These estimates using raw data that did not impute loss to follow-up as a death were 18.6% and 21.9%, respectively. In the combined analysis, survival through 1 year corrected age was higher for infants in the lucinactant group versus that of the infants in the animal-derived surfactants (beractant and poractant) group. The fixed-time-point estimates of mortality at 1 year corrected age imputing loss to follow-up as a death for lucinactant and animal-derived surfactants were 26.0% and 29.4%, respectively. However, the 1-year-corrected-age estimates using combined raw data were 24.6% for the lucinactant group and 26.7% for the animal-derived surfactant group. The incidence of postdischarge rehospitalizations, total number of rehospitalizations, incidence of respiratory illnesses, and total number of respiratory illnesses were generally similar among those in the treatment groups. Neurologic status at 1 year corrected age was essentially similar between infants who received lucinactant and those who received all other surfactants used in these 2 trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this 1-year follow-up of both lucinactant trials indicate that this new peptide-based synthetic surfactant is at least as good, if not superior, to animal-derived surfactants for prevention of respiratory distress syndrome and may be a viable alternative to animal-derived products.

Acute and sustained effects of lucinactant versus poractant-alpha on pulmonary gas exchange and mechanics in premature lambs with respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Animal-derived, protein-containing surfactants seem to be superior to protein-free surfactants. Lucinactant, a synthetic surfactant containing a surfactant protein-B peptide analog, has been shown to be effective in animal models and phase II clinical trials. To date, lucinactant has not been compared with an animal-derived surfactant in a premature animal model.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to compare the acute and sustained effects of lucinactant among premature lambs with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) with the effects of a natural porcine surfactant (poractant-alpha).

METHODS

After 5 minutes of mechanical ventilation twin premature lambs were assigned randomly to the lucinactant group (30 mg/mL, 5.8 mL/kg) or the poractant-alpha group (80 mg/mL, 2.2 mL/kg). Heart rate, systemic arterial pressure, arterial pH, blood gas values, and lung mechanics were recorded for 12 hours.

RESULTS

Baseline fetal pH values were similar for the 2 groups (pH 7.27). After 5 minutes of mechanical ventilation, severe RDS developed (pH: <7.08; Paco2: >80 mm Hg; Pao2: <40 mm Hg; dynamic compliance: <0.08 mL/cm H2O per kg). After surfactant instillation, similar improvements in gas exchange and lung mechanics were observed for the lucinactant and poractant-alpha groups at 1 hour (pH: 7.3 +/- 0.1 vs 7.4 +/- 0.1; Paco2: 8 +/- 18 mm Hg vs 40 +/- 8 mm Hg; Pao2: 167 +/- 52 mm Hg vs 259 +/- 51 mm Hg; dynamic compliance: 0.3 +/- 0.1 mL/cm H2O per kg vs 0.3 +/- 0.1 mL/cm H2O per kg). The improvements in lung function were sustained, with no differences between groups. Cardiovascular profiles remained stable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among preterm lambs with severe RDS, lucinactant produced improvements in gas exchange and lung mechanics similar to those observed with a porcine-derived surfactant.

Overview of surfactant replacement trials

Clinical trials have evaluated the overall efficacy of surfactant therapy, as well as the relative efficacy of different surfactant preparations, the optimal timing of administration and the optimal dosage. Surfactant therapy leads to significant clinical improvement in infants at risk for, or having, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Clinical trials that compared the effects of synthetic or animal-derived surfactant preparations to placebo or no therapy demonstrate that surfactant therapy lead to rapid improvement in oxygenation, decreased ventilator support, decreased risk of pneumothorax, and mortality. Earlier treatment, prophylactic treatment of infants at high risk of developing RDS, and selective re-treatment leads to improved clinical outcome as well. Currently available animal-derived surfactants are superior to non-protein-containing synthetic surfactants. Ongoing evaluation will determine if important differences in animal-derived products are noted. Future trials will evaluate third-generation surfactant products and further refine what constitutes optimal use of surfactant.

Developmental outcome of preterm infants after surfactant therapy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To review neuro-developmental outcome at 1 and 2 years of age following randomized controlled trials (RCT) of neonatal surfactant therapy.

METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Controlled Trial Register databases, searching for RCT of surfactant replacement therapy with follow-up outcomes, was carried out. The main outcome measures were severe and mild disability at 1 and 2 years plus composite adverse outcome of death and/or severe disability.

RESULTS

A meta-analysis using odds ratios was carried out on 13 RCT. There were a total of 2218 treated and 2090 control infants who underwent follow up at 1 year of age. There were 303 treated and 292 control infants with follow up at between 18 months and 2 years of age. Surfactant therapy was associated with a lower rate of mild disability at 1 year (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.95). There was a reduction in the combined adverse outcome (death or severe disability rate) at 1 year (OR 0.8; 95% CI 0.72-0.89). Neither the 1 year nor the 2 year follow-up examination showed a statistical difference in the severe disability rate between the control and treated group.

CONCLUSION

Surfactant therapy increases survival without an increase in subsequent morbidity at 1 and 2 years of age.

Lung surfactants for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: animal-derived or synthetic agents?

Exogenous surfactant therapy is widely used in the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Two types of surfactants are available: synthetic surfactants, and those derived from animal sources ("natural" surfactants). Both of these surfactants have been shown to be effective. In this article, we review the evidence to compare the two types of surfactants in terms of their physical properties, physiologic effects, and clinical outcomes. Natural surfactants have been shown to have advantages over synthetic surfactants in their physical properties and physiologic effects in animals, as well as in humans. A systematic review of 11 randomized clinical trials comparing natural and synthetic surfactants demonstrated that the use of natural surfactant preparations results in greater clinical benefits compared with synthetic surfactants. These benefits include a more rapid improvement in oxygenation and lung compliance after surfactant therapy, a decrease in the risk of mortality (typical relative risk 0.87; typical risk difference -0.02), and a decrease in the risk of pneumothorax (typical relative risk 0.63; typical risk difference -0.04). Although the use of natural surfactants results in a slightly increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage (typical relative risk 1.09; typical risk difference 0.03), there is no increase in the risk of grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage. There are theoretical but unproven risks of natural surfactants, such as transmission of infectious agents, immunogenicity and impurities in composition. The use of natural surfactants is preferred in most situations. In addition, clinicians should determine the costs of different types of surfactants in their individual practice settings and use this information in decision-making.

Current surfactant use in premature infants

Exogenous surfactant therapy has been a significant advance in the management of preterm infants with RDS. It has become established as a standard part of the management of such infants. Both natural and synthetic surfactants lead to clinical improvement and decreased mortality, with natural surfactants having additional advantages over currently available synthetic surfactants. The use of prophylactic surfactant administered after initial stabilization at birth to infants at risk for RDS has benefits compared with rescue surfactant given to treat infants with established RDS. In infants who do not receive prophylaxis, earlier treatment (before 2 hours) has benefits over later treatment. The use of multiple doses of surfactant is a superior strategy to the use of a single dose, whereas the use of a higher threshold for retreatment seems to be as effective as a low threshold. Adverse effects of surfactant therapy are infrequent and usually not serious. Long-term follow-up of infants treated with surfactant in the neonatal period is reassuring. In the future we are likely to see the development of new types of surfactants. Further research is required to determine the optimal use of surfactant in conjunction with other respiratory interventions.

A risk-benefit assessment of natural and synthetic exogenous surfactants in the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

Alveolar surfactant is central to pulmonary physiology. Quantitative and qualitative surfactant abnormalities appear to be the primary aetiological factors in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and exogenous replacement of surfactant is a rational treatment. Available exogenous surfactants have a natural (mammal-derived lung surfactants) or synthetic origin. Pharmacodynamic and clinical studies have demonstrated that exogenous surfactants immediately improve pulmonary distensibility and gas exchange; however, this is achieved more slowly and with more failures with synthetic surfactants. The ensuing advantageous haemodynamic effects are not so striking and they include an inconvenient increased left to right ductal shunt. Two strategies of administration have been used: prophylactic or rescue therapy to treat declared RDS. All methods of instillation require intubation. In addition to the early benefits (improved gas exchange and reduced ventilatory support) the incidence of classical complications of RDS, especially air leak events, is decreased except for the uncommon problem of pulmonary haemorrhage. The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia is neither uniformly nor significantly reduced although the severity appears to be lessened. The overall incidence of peri-intraventricular haemorrhages is not diminished although separate trials have shown a decreased rate. The most striking beneficial effect of exogenous surfactants is the increased survival (of about 40%) of treated very low birthweight neonates. A small number of adverse effects has been described. The long term outcome of survivor neonates with RDS treated with surfactants versus control neonates with RDS not treated with surfactants is similar in terms of physical growth, at least as good in terms of respiratory status, with a similar or slightly better neurodevelopmental outcome. There is not clear benefit of exogenous surfactant therapy in extremely premature infants (< 26 weeks gestational age, birthweight < 750 g). The potential risks of contamination, inflammatory and immunogenic reaction and the inhalation of platelet activating factor remain a theoretical concern of surfactant therapy which has not been confirmed in clinical practice. The optimal timing of treatment favours prophylaxis over rescue treatment and early rescue treatment rather than delayed therapy. Meta-analyses suggest the clinical superiority of natural surfactant extracts over a synthetic one (colfosceril palmitate). The economic impact of surfactant therapy is favourable and the costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for surviving surfactant treated infants are low. In conclusion, the mid and long term benefit/risk ratio clearly favours the use of exogenous surfactants to prevent or to treat RDS in neonates who have a gestational age of > 26 weeks or a birthweight of > 750 g, especially with the prophylactic strategy using natural surfactant extracts.

[Modification of C-reactive protein after instillation of natural exogenous surfactants]

BACKGROUND

Blood C-reactive protein levels have been frequently found to be increased after Curosurf instillation. These variations have been compared to the values after Surfexo therapy and after absence of surfactant therapy.

POPULATION AND METHODS

The files of not infected premature babies, aged 25 to 36 weeks of gestational age, under mechanical ventilation for a hyaline membrane disease (HMD), admitted in our unit between January 1990 to June 1995, have been retrospectively studied. They were separated into three groups: A: 67 infants ventilated for more than 5 days for HMD without surfactant therapy; B: 23 infants treated by Surfexo; C: 60 infants treated by Curosurf. CRP was measured daily between day 0 (DO) and D5. Means and standard deviations were calculated for each day and each group. The mean values of CRP at D1 to D5 in group C were compared to DO. The daily CRP values were compared in the three groups. For group C, the results were studied daily according to the gestational age, dosage and age of the neonate at the first instillation. The statistical results have been given according to the Student t test.

RESULTS

After Curosurf, the mean CRP value rose significantly from D1 to D4 compared to D0. There was no difference of CRP between groups A and B from D0 to D5, Group C had higher values in comparison to group A (between D1 to D5) and to group B (between D1 and D3). There was no significant difference of the CRP values in group C according to the number of instillations or the amount instilled, but CRP was lower in early treated infants (< H6).

DISCUSSION

Curosurf instillation is followed by a significant increase in CRP, maximum at D2. This is not seen after Surfexo. This increase seems less important at D2-D3 when Curosurf is administered early. The CRP increase after Curosurf therapy could be due to an inflammatory reaction to the heterologous proteins it contains.

[Natural or artificial surfactants? Arguments in favour of natural surfactants]

The use of exogenous surfactant (ES) is an essential component for prevention and treatment of hyaline membrane disease (HMD). The ES available for clinical use are of two therapeutic classes: natural surfactants prepared from mammalian lung and artificial surfactants. The choice between these two classes of ES is controversial. In this overview, we present the arguments in favour of the preferential use of natural ES. The presence of hydrophobic specific proteins (SP-B and SP-C) provides to natural ES better surface tension properties than artificial ES. The in vitro greater efficacy of natural ES has been confirmed in vivo in experimental models of surfactant deficiency, human pharmacodynamic studies, and comparative clinical trials. Furthermore, the excellent clinical tolerance and harmlessness of natural ES has been firmly established. A meta-analysis of the comparative clinical trials between natural ES and one artificial ES (enrolling as many as 4400 babies treated for HMD) suggests that the use of natural ES compared to this artificial ES significantly reduces the neonatal mortality by 20%. In conclusion, all these arguments are in favor of the preferential use of natural ES for prevention and treatment of HMD.

Controversies: synthetic or natural surfactant. The case for natural surfactant

Surfactant replacement therapy for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is not new, the first trials having been performed over 30 years ago. These early trials used synthetic protein-free surfactants administered as aerosols and were unsuccessful. Since 1980 a variety of natural and synthetic surfactant preparations have been used to treat or prevent RDS, and both demonstrate clinical effects. I have used evidence derived from 3 areas to demonstrate the superiority of natural surfactants: in vitro physical properties, in vivo physiological effects and the results of comparative clinical trials. using the pulsating bubble surfactometer, the surface tension at maximum and minimum bubble size are significantly lower for natural compared to synthetic surfactants (31 and 0 mN/m versus 53 and 29 mN/m respectively). Physiological effects of surfactants have been compared in immature rabbits and lambs and both models demonstrate the superiority of natural surfactants. For example in immature rabbits lung compliance values after 60 minutes of ventilation are 0.60 ml/cmH2O in natural surfactant treated animals, 0.44 ml/cmH2O in synthetic surfactant treated animals and 0.34 ml/cmH2O in controls (p < 0.01). The technique of meta-analysis was used to analyse the outcome of 6 comparative clinical trials of natural and synthetic surfactants. These 6 studies included 3536 babies and 5 of them compared Survanta (a bovine natural surfactant) and Exosurf (a synthetic protein-free surfactant). One study compared Infasurf (another bovine natural surfactant with Exosurf). Meta-analysis shows a 19% reduction in the odds of neonatal death for natural compared to synthetic surfactant treated babies (OR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.66-0.98). For bronchopulmonary dysplasia there was a non-significant reduction in risk for Survanta-treated babies (OR, 0.93; 95% CO 0.78-1.10). In summary, there is now clear evidence of physiological and clinical superiority of natural compared to synthetic surfactants. Surfactant proteins B and C are needed to facilitate rapid adsorption and spreading of phospholipids. They also account for the more rapid clinical action allowing oxygen and ventilator pressures to be lowered soon after administration. The odds of neonatal mortality are reduced by about 20% if natural surfactants are preferred to their synthetic protein-free counterparts. Long-term follow-up studies of babies treated with both types of surfactant should be a top priority.

One-year follow-up of 66 premature infants weighing 500 to 699 grams treated with a single dose of synthetic surfactant or air placebo at birth: results of a double-blind trial. American Exosurf Neonatal Study Group I

In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that enrolled 215 premature infants with birth weights of 500 to 699 gm, 106 infants were treated prophylactically with a single 5 ml/kg dose of synthetic surfactant and 109 infants were given an equivalent dose of air placebo shortly after birth. In each group, 40 children survived infancy: 36 children in the air placebo group and 30 children in the synthetic surfactant group were available for follow-up. Weight, height, and head circumference measurements were similar for both groups at 1-year adjusted age. Infants who received synthetic surfactant at birth had statistically similar Bayley Scales of Infant Development scores (mental developmental index, 92 vs 83; psychomotor developmental index, 87 vs 82) compared with controls. Mild to moderate impairments in the synthetic surfactant group were 7% versus 29% in the control group; these differences were not statistically significant. The incidence of retinopathy of prematurity, the number of hospital readmissions, the need for surgery after day 28, evidence of chronic lung disease, the need for respiratory support at 1-year adjusted age, and the incidence of allergies were also not different between the two groups. However, the proportion of infants surviving without impairment was modestly higher in the synthetic surfactant group (8%, air placebo group; 23%, synthetic surfactant group). The findings from this small study indicate that infants weighing 500 to 699 gm who receive a single prophylactic dose of synthetic surfactant at birth have neurodevelopmental outcomes at least equivalent to those of infants given air placebo at 1-year follow-up.

Double-blind evaluation of developmental and health status to age 2 years of infants weighing 700 to 1350 grams treated prophylactically at birth with a single dose of synthetic surfactant or air placebo

In a previously published article, we reported results of a two-center study of outcome to 28 days of 385 infants with birth weights from 700 to 1350 gm who were assigned randomly to receive a single 5 ml/kg intratracheal dose of either synthetic surfactant or air placebo. Infants treated with surfactant had a higher rate of survival to 28 days without bronchopulmonary dysplasia than did control subjects given an air placebo. The present study assessed survivors in early childhood to determine neurodevelopmental outcome and late morbidity. Two hundred fifty-eight surviving infants from both centers were evaluated at 1-year adjusted age; medical histories were obtained, standard physical and neurologic examinations were performed, and Bayley Scales of Infant Development were administered. Ophthalmologic examinations were performed at various times between 28 days and 1-year adjusted age. At 2-years adjusted age, 118 infants from one center were reevaluated with the same procedures and also had hearing and speech evaluations. Neither the 1-year assessment of the entire population nor the 2-year assessment of the one center's cohort revealed physical or neurodevelopmental differences between treatment groups. We conclude that administration of a single prophylactic dose of synthetic surfactant to premature infants with birth weights from 700 to 1350 grams results in improved survival rates to 28 days without bronchopulmonary dysplasia and is not associated with adverse health or neurodevelopmental effects at 1-year or 2-years adjusted age.

One-year follow-up evaluation of 260 premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome and birth weights of 700 to 1350 grams randomized to two rescue doses of synthetic surfactant or air placebo. American Exosurf Neonatal Study Group I

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of synthetic surfactant therapy for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and birth weights of 700 to 1350 gm demonstrated a reduction in severity of RDS, morbidity, and neonatal and 1-year mortality. Of the 419 infants who were entered in the study, 80% of the surviving infants in both the air placebo group (122) and the synthetic surfactant group (138) returned for the follow-up evaluation at 1-year adjusted age. The only significant difference observed at follow-up was a reduction in the incidence of mild cerebral palsy in the synthetic surfactant group (air placebo group, 8 of 122 (7%); synthetic surfactant group, 3 of 138 (2%); relative risk 0.306; 95% confidence interval 0.094, 0.999). No differences were observed between the air placebo and synthetic surfactant treatment groups with respect to health status of the infants, including the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity and neurodevelopmental delays. The difference in the overall incidence of impairment among the 1-year survivors in the air placebo group (43 of 122 (35%)) and in the synthetic surfactant group (40 of 138 (29%)) was not statistically significant. The results of this 1-year follow-up study show that rescue treatment with synthetic surfactant in infants weighing 700 to 1300 gm is not associated with adverse developmental consequences despite the improvement in survival.

One-year follow-up of 273 infants with birth weights of 700 to 1100 grams after prophylactic treatment of respiratory distress syndrome with synthetic surfactant or air placebo. American Exosurf Neonatal Study Group I

A single dose of synthetic surfactant was administered prophylactically to premature neonates with birth weights between 700 and 1100 gm. The effects of this treatment on neurodevelopmental, neurologic, and ophthalmologic outcomes, impairments, and general health status were examined during a follow-up evaluation at 1-year adjusted age. The study was a multicenter, parallel, randomized, double-blind comparison of 446 infants who received either air placebo (n = 222) or synthetic surfactant (n = 224). Follow-up evaluations were completed for 82% of surviving infants in both treatment groups. Neurodevelopmental outcome and growth were equivalent in the infants treated with synthetic surfactant and in the infants given air placebo. Impairments occurred in 38% of the infants treated with air placebo compared with 31% of those given synthetic surfactant; the difference was not statistically significant (relative risk 0.809, 95% confidence interval 0.585, 1.119). The incidence of asthma was significantly higher in the group of infants given air placebo (4% vs 10% for surfactant and air placebo, respectively, relative risk 0.391, 95% confidence intervals 0.157, 0.972). Other outcomes, including retinopathy of prematurity, hospital readmissions, surgery, and evidence of chronic lung disease, were not different. Administration of a single prophylactic dose of synthetic surfactant increases survival in infants with birth weights between 700 and 110 gm without increasing the number or proportion of impaired survivors.

One-year outcome in 232 premature infants with birth weights of 750 to 1249 grams and respiratory distress syndrome randomized to rescue treatment with two doses of synthetic surfactant or air placebo. Canadian Exosurf Neonatal Study Group

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed in 13 hospitals in Canada to assess whether two rescue doses of a synthetic surfactant (Exosurf Neonatal) would reduce mortality and morbidity rates in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome who weighed from 750 to 1249 gm. As part of the original trial design, double-blind follow-up evaluations were performed at 1-year adjusted age. A total of 118 patients who received air placebo and 114 patients who received synthetic surfactant were evaluated at 1 year. Growth and development in the two groups were equivalent. Scores on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development were within the normal range for both groups (mental development index, 90 +/- 22 vs 92 +/- 22; psychomotor development index, 81 +/- 19 vs 87 +/- 22 for the air placebo and synthetic surfactant groups, respectively). However, in both groups the proportion of infants with any impairment (air placebo group, 43 of 118 (36%); synthetic surfactant group, 41 of 114 (36%) and severe impairment (air placebo group, 29 of 118 (25%); synthetic surfactant group, 21 of 114 (18%)) was substantial. We conclude that two rescue doses of synthetic surfactant in infants with RDS who weighed 750 to 1249 gm had no detrimental effect on developmental outcome or late morbidity. No long-term benefits to 12-months corrected age were observed with the use of surfactant in this weight class. Larger studies or meta-analyses of existing trials will be required to determine if there are any late outcome advantages associated with rescue use of synthetic surfactant in infants weighing 700 to 1249 gm.

Double-blind 1-year follow-up of 1540 infants with respiratory distress syndrome randomized to rescue treatment with two doses of synthetic surfactant or air in four clinical trials. American and Canadian Exosurf Neonatal Study Groups

Synthetic surfactant has been shown to reduce neonatal and 1-year mortality and neonatal morbidity in infants with respiratory distress syndrome. However, less is known about the effects of synthetic surfactant on developmental outcome and long-term morbidity. Four multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of synthetic surfactant administered as rescue therapy were conducted in the United States and Canada, with a total enrollment of 2224 patients. Double-blind developmental evaluations of survivors were conducted at 1 year of age (adjusted for prematurity) in all four trials. Of the 1802 patients enrolled in the placebo-controlled rescue trials who survived to 1 year, 1540 (85%) completed the 1-year follow-up evaluation. Height, weight, and head circumference measurements were not different in the treatment and control groups. Mean and median Bayley Scores of Infant Development for both the Mental Development Index and the Psychomotor Development Index were also equivalent. The incidence of impairments was not different in the two groups (mild to moderate impairment, 12% (92 of 745) for the air placebo group vs 11% (86 of 771) for the synthetic surfactant group; severe impairment, 15% (114 of 745) for the air placebo group vs 13% (102 of 771) for the synthetic surfactant group). No differences in rates of retinopathy of prematurity or hearing impairment were found in the treatment groups. The need for surgery after day 28 of life (relative risk, 0.779; 95% confidence interval, 0.665, 0.927) and the need for respiratory support at 1 year (relative risk, 0.525; 95% confidence intervals, 0.303, 0.911) were both reduced in the synthetic surfactant group. These results indicate that developmental outcome at 1 year of age is at least as good among infants with respiratory distress syndrome who received rescue therapy with synthetic surfactant as it is in infants who received air placebo; the results also indicate that the incidence of long-term morbidity is reduced.

One-year follow-up of 89 infants with birth weights of 500 to 749 grams and respiratory distress syndrome randomized to two rescue doses of synthetic surfactant or air placebo. Canadian Exosurf Neonatal Study Group. Canadian Exosurf Neonatal Follow-Up Group

Double-blind neurodevelopmental and physical evaluations were conducted at 1-year adjusted age in 89 infants with birth weights of 500 to 749 gm who had respiratory distress syndrome in the neonatal period and were randomized to receive two rescue doses of a synthetic surfactant (Exosurf Neonatal, Burroughs Wellcome Co., Research Triangle Park, N.C.) or air placebo. The trial used a common protocol and was conducted at 13 hospitals; patients were entered in the trial between February 1988 and September 1990. Ninety-five percent of surviving infants were assessed. Growth and development in the two groups were equivalent. Mean Bayley Scales of Infant Development scores were comparable (mental development index, 79 +/- 22 vs 87 +/- 20; psychomotor development index, 73 +/- 18 vs 81 +/- 19 for air placebo and synthetic surfactant, respectively). The incidence of severe retinopathy of prematurity was significantly decreased in the surfactant group compared with the air placebo group (15% vs 34%; relative risk 0.428; 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.9). Overall, administration of surfactant appeared to increase the probability of a favorable outcome. Confirmation of the trends observed in this study would provide a strong rationale for the rescue use of synthetic surfactant in extremely low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome even if overall mortality is not reduced.

Intracerebral haemorrhages in surfactant treated neonates with severe respiratory distress syndrome: age at diagnosis, severity and risk factors

Within a randomized European multicentre trial the time of onset, severity and progression of intracerebral haemorrhages (ICH) were investigated prospectively by serial cranial ultrasonography in 343 ventilated infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) following instillation of single or multiple doses of a natural porcine surfactant (Curosurf). In 148/343 infants (43%) ICH was diagnosed (grade I or II: 22%, grade III or IV: 21%). In 26 cases (8%) ICH was present on the ultrasound scan prior to surfactant instillation at a median age of 6 h. Incidence and severity of ICH was similar after single- or multiple-dose surfactant treatment. Using a logistic regression model the following risk factors predictive of ICH were defined: low birth weight, allocation to certain hospitals, vaginal delivery, Apgar score < or = 6, rectal temperature on admission < or = 36 degrees C, primary anaemia, acidosis prior to treatment, RDS grade IV in pre-treatment chest films and poor response to surfactant treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides supportive evidence that multiple doses of Curosurf do not increase the risk for ICH as compared to single-dose administration.

Porcine-derived lung surfactant. A review of the therapeutic efficacy and clinical tolerability of a natural surfactant preparation (Curosurf) in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

Porcine-derived lung surfactant (PLS; Curosurf) has shown efficacy in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. PLS consists of phospholipids, mainly dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine, the primary surface-active agent of natural lung surfactant, and pulmonary surfactant-associated proteins which facilitate spreading and adsorption of the surface-active agent at the air-alveolar interface. Intratracheal administration of a single dose of PLS 200 mg/kg significantly improves the survival rate and reduces the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days in premature infants (birthweight 700 to 2000g) with severe respiratory distress syndrome (fraction of inspired oxygen > or = 0.60). PLS also reduces the incidence of air leak events such as pulmonary interstitial emphysema and pneumothorax. The response rate may be further improved by administration of additional 100 mg/kg doses at 12-hour intervals to infants showing a poor response or relapse after a single dose. PLS prophylaxis reduces the incidence and severity of respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants at high risk of developing the disease; however, it remains unclear whether the eventual clinical outcome is similar or superior to that observed in infants who receive rescue treatment. PLS is well tolerated and does not appear to increase the incidence of complications of prematurity or respiratory distress syndrome, including patent ductus arteriosus and intraventricular haemorrhage. Although its effect on long term development require further investigation, early indications are that PLS is not associated with any long term adverse sequelae. Comparative trials are clearly warranted to determine the efficacy and tolerability of PLS relative to that of other available surfactant preparations, particularly to explore preliminary indications that a more rapid effect of natural surfactants such as PLS (compared with synthetic products) may correlate with improved clinical outcomes, and that PLS may result in fewer complications than synthetic preparations. Thus, available data show PLS to be a very effective agent for the treatment and prophylaxis of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and that it may have some advantages over synthetic preparations.

Two-year follow-up of infants treated for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome with bovine surfactant. Survanta Multidose Study Group

In 1988 and 1989, a total of 1228 infants were studied in four double-blind, controlled, multidose clinical trials establishing the safety and efficacy of beractant (Survanta intratracheal suspension, Ross Products Division of Abbott Laboratories), a modified bovine lung extract, in prevention and treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Data on clinical status were collected for surviving infants at hospital discharge and at 6, 12, and 24 months of adjusted age. Significantly fewer beractant-treated infants required supplemental oxygen at discharge (p = 0.036). At 6 months of adjusted age, beractant-treated infants had more wheezing (p = 0.023) than control infants, a reduced need for supplemental oxygen (p = 0.019), and a lower incidence of cerebral palsy (p = 0.020). At 12 months of adjusted age, beractant-treated infants had less wheezing than control infants (p = 0.005), and this finding persisted at 24 months of adjusted age (p = 0.008). No circulating antibodies to the proteins present in beractant were found in serum samples at 6 and 12 months of age. These results suggest that the increased survival rate associated with beractant treatment is followed through 2 years of adjusted age by outcomes equivalent to those of untreated control infants.