Stereotest artifacts and the strabismus patient

Binocular non-stereoscopic cues can deceive clinical tests of stereopsis

Stereoscopic vision plays a critical role in visual perception; however, it is difficult to assess. In clinical settings, stereoacuity is assessed with clinical stereotests. Observers can use monocular cues to deceive some of the most common stereotests, such as the Titmus test. The Randot test has been found free of monocular cues, and here we confirm that result by testing observers under monocular viewing. However, there is a common misconception that only monocular cues can be used to deceive stereotests. Here we demonstrate that binocular non-stereoscopic cues can also be used to pass the Randot, by testing participants with the test rotated, a condition that abolishes stereopsis, and comparing the performance to a monocular viewing condition. We also assessed the Random Dot Butterfly test and discovered considerable amounts of non-stereoscopic cues, including binocular cues in the Circles that can be used to deceive the test. Participants with amblyopia had more difficulty using non-stereoscopic cues than neurotypical observers. We gathered normal-viewing Randot stereoacuities for 110 participants (90 neurotypical and 20 with amblyopia) and compared them to psychophysical stereoacuities (our gold standard). The Randot test showed low positive normalized predictive values for detecting stereoblindness. It could perfectly detect stereo-impairment but with a low sensitivity.

The prevalence and diagnosis of 'stereoblindness' in adults less than 60 years of age: a best evidence synthesis

PURPOSE

Stereoscopic vision (or stereopsis) is the ability to perceive depth from binocular disparity - the difference of viewpoints between the two eyes. Interestingly, there are large individual differences as to how well one can appreciate depth from such a cue. The total absence of stereoscopic vision, called 'stereoblindness', has been associated with negative behavioural outcomes such as poor distance estimation. Surprisingly, the prevalence of stereoblindness remains unclear, as it appears highly dependent on the way in which stereopsis is measured.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review highlights the fact that stereopsis is not a unitary construct, but rather implies different systems. The optimal conditions for measuring these varieties of stereoscopic information processing are discussed given the goal of detecting stereoblindness, using either psychophysical or clinical stereotests. In that light, we then discuss the estimates of stereoblindness prevalence of past studies.

SUMMARY

We identify four different approaches that all converge toward a prevalence of stereoblindness of 7% (median approach: 7%; unambiguous-stereoblindness-criteria approach: 7%; visual-defect-included approach: 7%; multiple-criteria approach: 7%). We note that these estimates were derived considering adults of age <60 years old. Older adults may have a higher prevalence. Finally, we make recommendations for a new ecological definition of stereoblindness and for efficient clinical methods for determining stereoblindness by adapting existing tools.

Modified Test Protocol Improves Sensitivity of the Stereo Fly Test

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereoacuity measurement is a common element of pediatric ophthalmic examinations. Although the Stereo Fly Test is routinely used to establish the presence of coarse stereopsis (3000 arcsecs), it often yields a false negative "pass" due to learned responses and non-stereoscopic cues. We developed and evaluated a modified Stereo Fly Test protocol aimed at increasing sensitivity, thus reducing false negatives.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Stereo Fly Test was administered according to manufacturer instructions to 321 children aged 3-12 years. Children with a "pass" outcome (n = 147) were re-tested wearing glasses fitted with polarizers of matching orientation for both eyes to verify that they were responding to stereoscopic cues (modified protocol). The response to the standard Stereo Fly Test was considered a false negative (pass) if the child still pinched above the plate after disparity cues were eliminated. Randot® Preschool Stereoacuity and Butterfly Tests were used as gold standards.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Sensitivity was 81% (95% CI: 0.75 - 0.86) for standard administration of the Stereo Fly Test (19% false negative "pass"). The modified protocol increased sensitivity to 90% (95% CI: 0.85 - 0.94). The modified two-step protocol is a simple and convenient way to administer the Stereo Fly Test with increased sensitivity in a clinical setting.

Modification of the titmus fly test to improve accuracy

INTRODUCTION

In spite of its well-known flaws, the Titmus test is still the most commonly available and frequently utilized stereotest worldwide. Detecting stereopsis in the patient with small-angle strabismus is an important part of the sensorimotor exam. Because these patients often have only gross stereopsis, stereoacuity may have to be evaluated with the House Fly plate alone. This study evaluates an alternative method of presentation designed to decrease the false positive rate of the Titmus Fly test.

METHODS

A group of orthotropic volunteers with normal binocular vision, a group of patients with small angle strabismus, and a group of patients whose angle of strabismus was large enough to preclude stereopsis were tested with the Titmus Fly using two different presentations and compared.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of the Titmus Fly test was 79%, but specificity was only 26% due to the large number of false positive responses detected with the modified presentation. Patients with childhood-onset strabismus who have been repeatedly exposed to this test over many visits were particularly vulnerable to overestimation of stereoacuity.

CONCLUSION

If the Titmus fly test is the only stereoacuity measure that can be used due to the presence of manifest strabismus, modifying the presentation of the test plate with this method will improve accuracy and precision of results.

Stereopsis results at 4.5 years of age in the infant aphakia treatment study

PURPOSE

To determine whether stereopsis of infants treated for monocular cataracts varies with the type of optical correction used.

DESIGN

Randomized prospective clinical trial.

METHODS

The Infant Aphakia Treatment Study randomized 114 patients with unilateral cataracts at age 1-7 months to either primary intraocular lens (IOL) or contact lens correction. At 4.5 years of age a masked examiner assessed stereopsis on these patients using 3 different tests: (1) Frisby; (2) Randot Preschool; and (3) Titmus Fly.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (25%) had a positive response to at least 1 of the stereopsis tests. There was no statistically significant difference in stereopsis between the 2 treatment groups: Frisby (contact lens, 6 [11%]; IOL, 7 [13%]; P = .99), Randot (contact lens, 3 [6%]; IOL, 1 [2%]; P = .62), or Titmus (contact lens, 8 [15%]; IOL, 13 [23%]; P = .34). The median age at surgery for patients with stereopsis was younger than for those without stereopsis (1.2 vs 2.4 months; P = .002). The median visual acuity for patients with stereopsis was better than for those without stereopsis (20/40 vs 20/252; P = .0003).

CONCLUSION

The type of optical correction did not influence stereopsis outcomes. However, 2 other factors did: age at surgery and visual acuity in the treated eye at age 4.5 years. Early surgery for unilateral congenital cataract and the presence of visual acuity better than or equal to 20/40 appear to be more important than the type of initial optical correction used for the development of stereopsis.

Maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis

BACKGROUND

We prospectively evaluated the performance of three stereoacuity tests in patients with a wide range of strabismus angles to determine the maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis as well as the extent of false-positive results.

METHODS

Subjects age > or = 5 years old (n = 186) with constant horizontal strabismus were prospectively studied. Stereoacuity was measured using the Titmus Fly, Animals, and Circles tests; the original Preschool Randot test; and the Frisby test. We defined a false-positive result as any positive response to a stereoacuity test when a patient had > 20 prism diopters (PD) of deviation. Based on the results from our previous study of monocularly patched adults, we then defined a true-positive result as Titmus circles five to nine, at least 400" on the original Preschool Randot test, or a pass on the Frisby test. Data were then analyzed to determine a maximum deviation consistent with true stereopsis.

RESULTS

False-positive results occurred with Titmus Fly (6%), Titmus Animals (10%), Titmus Circles (35%), and the 800 seconds of arc (") level of the original Preschool Randot test (10%). No false-positive results were seen with the Frisby test. Applying the criteria for a true-positive result, we found that no patient with > 10 PD of deviation had true stereopsis. The two patients with 10 PD and 6 PD deviations could not subsequently pass the Frisby test and were therefore deemed not to have true stereopsis. We concluded that the threshold for true stereopsis may be as low as 4 PD of horizontal deviation.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the Titmus Fly, Titmus Animals, and Titmus Circles (the first four circles) tests possess monocular clues that limit their usefulness for clinical testing. The Frisby test is particularly useful for rapid assessment of whether stereopsis is present or absent. The new Preschool Randot test is valuable for quantifying stereopsis in both children and adults. True stereopsis may be rare when a patient has a horizontal deviation > 4 PD.

Early binocular visual experience may improve binocular sensory outcomes in children after surgery for congenital unilateral cataract

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of intensive and reduced occlusion therapy regimens on binocular sensory outcomes, visual acuity, and the prevalence of strabismus in children after surgery for congenital unilateral cataract.

METHODS

Two nonrandomized groups of patients were studied prospectively: (1) an intensive occlusion group (n = 29) patched 80% of waking hours were followed for a median 6.9 years and (2) a reduced occlusion group (n = 8) patched 25% to 50% of waking hours were followed for a median 4.3 years. Six subjects in the intensive group and 4 in the reduced occlusion group had secondary intraocular lenses. Two subjects in the intensive group had epikeratophakia surgery. Binocular sensory function was assessed with random dot and contour stereoacuity tests and the Worth 4-dot test. The prevalence and age at onset of strabismus were determined from the patients' charts.

RESULTS

A higher proportion of subjects in the reduced occlusion group (50%) had stereoacuity or fusion compared with the intensive occlusion group (14%), a borderline significant difference (P =.08). No significant difference (P =.55) was found in median visual acuity between the intensive (20/50) and the reduced occlusion (20/55) groups. The 90% prevalence of strabismus in the intensive occlusion group was slightly higher than the 63% prevalence in the reduced occlusion group, although this difference was not significant (P =.18).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that a reduced occlusion protocol may be associated with better binocular sensory outcomes and a reduced prevalence of strabismus without compromising good visual acuity in children treated for congenital unilateral cataract.