Multiple primary melanomas: implications for screening and follow-up programs for melanoma

Synchronous Melanoma: Definition, Prognosis, and Implications. A Comprehensive Review of Literature

Background

Although multiple primary melanomas (MPMs) have been reported in the literature, the subgroup of synchronous melanomas (SMs) remains understudied.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of the English literature from 1972 to 2023 to characterize SM. Our objective was to clarify the definition, determine incidence and prognosis, and present recommendations.

Results

We found 18 case series articles and six case reports that met our criteria. Twelve of eighteen studies defined SM as a second primary melanoma identified within 1 month. The total number of SM patients reported was 1083. The cumulative percentage of MPM in total melanoma patients was 2.9 %, and the cumulative percentage of SM patients in MPM patients was 31.3%. SM patients trended toward higher body anatomical concordance, older age, and male sex. Despite limited data, SMs do not show a worse prognosis for patients compared with single melanomas.

Conclusions

Despite a lack of consensus in the past, we recommend that SM be defined as a second primary melanoma detected within 1 month of the initial diagnosis. SMs comprise almost one-third of MPM cases and do not seem to carry any worse prognosis than the patients presenting with single melanoma. We believe older age and male sex may be more prone to SM. We recommend patient education, self-skin evaluations and TSE at initial and follow-up visits. Neither randomized controlled trials nor meta-analyses on SM exist. Ideally, further studies with a large cohort of patients are needed to accurately define SM.

Risk Factors Associated With First and Second Primary Melanomas in a High-Incidence Population

Importance

An increasing number of people develop more than 1 primary melanoma, yet to date, no population-based prospective cohort studies have reported on risk factors for developing first vs second primary melanomas.

Objective

To compare the clinical characteristics of first and second melanomas and then to estimate the relative risks of developing 1 vs multiple melanomas associated with demographic, phenotypic, sun exposure, and genetic factors.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based prospective cohort study included men and women aged 40 to 69 years recruited in 2011 and followed up until December 2018 in Queensland, Australia. Data analysis was performed from February to July 2022.

Exposures

Self-reported information about demographic, phenotypic, and sun exposure measures captured using a survey completed at baseline, and polygenic risk score for melanoma.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Incident first or second primary melanoma diagnosis, and histologic and clinical characteristics thereof. The Wei-Lin-Weissfeld model for recurrent events was used to estimate the association of each factor with the risks of first and second primary melanoma.

Results

A total of 38 845 patients (mean [SD] age at baseline, 56.1 [8.2] years; 17 775 men and 21 070 women) were included in the study. During a median follow-up period of 7.4 years, 1212 (3.1%) participants had a single primary melanoma diagnosis, and 245 (0.6%) had a second primary melanoma diagnosis. Second melanomas were more likely than first melanomas to be in situ; for invasive tumors, second melanomas were more likely to be thin (ie, ≤1 mm) than first melanomas. Having many moles at age 21 years (self-reported using visual scoring tool) was more strongly associated with second (hazard ratio [HR], 6.36; 95% CI, 3.77-10.75) than first primary melanoma (HR, 3.46; 95% CI, 2.72-4.40) (P value for difference between the HRs = .01). A high genetic predisposition (ie, polygenic risk score in tertile 3) was also more strongly associated with second (HR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.06-5.23) than first melanoma (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.71-2.49; P = .03). Second melanomas were more strongly associated with a history of multiple skin cancer excisions (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.80-3.83) than first melanomas (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.61-2.16; P = .05). For all other phenotypic characteristics and sun exposure measures, similarly elevated associations with first vs second melanomas were observed.

Conclusions and Relevance

Findings of this cohort study suggest that within the general population, the presence of many nevi and having a high genetic predisposition to melanoma were associated with the highest risks of developing second primary melanomas.

Multiple Primary Melanomas: Retrospective Review in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Multiple primary melanomas (MPM) refer to the occurrence of more than one synchronous or metachronous melanoma in the same individual. The aim of this study was to identify the frequency of MPM and describe the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of patients with MPM. An observational single-center retrospective study was designed based on a cohort of melanoma patients followed in a tertiary care hospital. Fifty-eight (8.9%) patients developed MPM. Most patients were men (65.5%) and the median age at the time of diagnosis of the first melanoma was 71 years old. The median time of diagnosis of the second melanoma from the first melanoma was 10.9 months, and 77.6% of second melanomas were diagnosed within the first 5 years. In total, 29 (50%) and 28 (48.3%) first and second melanomas were located in the trunk, respectively. Concordance of anatomic site between primary and subsequent melanoma was found in 46.6% of the patients. Proportion of in situ melanomas was increasingly higher in subsequent melanomas (from 36.21% of first melanomas to 100% of fifth melanomas). An increasing rate of melanomas with histological regression was observed within subsequent melanomas (from 60.3% of first melanomas to 80% of third melanomas). Our results support the importance of careful long-term follow-up with total body examination in melanoma patients.

The experience of outdoor physical activity for skin cancer survivors: understanding the importance of the built and natural environments

PURPOSE

Cancer patients are encouraged to do more physical activity (PA). Exercising in outdoor settings, however, may expose people to UV radiation, which is the main risk factor of melanoma. This study aimed to understand how melanoma diagnoses affect people's perception of the outdoor environment for PA.

METHOD

In-depth interviews were conducted among 19 individuals (20-85 years) with a history of melanoma at a skin cancer clinic in the Denver metropolitan area. Transcribed interviews were coded for emergent themes. The coding framework included topics related to PA behavior, sun protection, and perceptions of outdoor environment.

RESULTS

Respondents reported no change in their level of outdoor activity after the melanoma diagnosis; they tried to reduce the risk of sun exposure by using sunscreen and sun-protective clothing. They also reported seeking shade, trees, and groundcover along urban corridors, in order to avoid sun exposure, reflective surfaces, and heat while being active outdoors.

CONCLUSION

Given the public health significance of UV exposure and extreme heat, further investments should be made to craft streetscape design guidelines and implement sun-proof spaces across public facilities, including parks, schools, and sport fields in order to ameliorate environmental risks for skin cancer survivors, to prevent future cancers among those that are vulnerable to the hazards of excessive UV exposure and extreme heat, and to promote outdoor PA.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Skin cancer survivors and other vulnerable population subgroups will benefit from discussions around neighborhood-based design interventions that promote PA while accounting for sun safety.

Comparison of Survival Between Patients With Single vs Multiple Primary Cutaneous Melanomas

Importance

Melanoma is one of the most rapidly increasing forms of cancer worldwide. Most studies about survival among patients with melanoma consider only the primary tumor and disregard the potential effect of multiple primary tumors. A better understanding of the prognosis of patients with multiple primary melanoma is important for patient counselling and follow-up strategies.

Objective

To describe the epidemiologic features of multiple primary melanoma in patients from the Netherlands.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective, population-based cohort study included adults with histologically proven, primary, invasive cutaneous melanoma in the Netherlands between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2014, with a median follow-up of 75.1 months, using data from PALGA, the Dutch Nationwide Network and Registry of Histopathology and Cytopathology. Follow-up data were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Statistical analysis was performed from August 1, 2018, to September 3, 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

A multivariable Cox model with a time-varying covariate was performed to assess overall survival between patients with a single primary melanoma vs those with multiple primary melanomas. Secondary outcomes included incidence of multiple primary melanoma, differences in Breslow thickness, and time between first and second multiple primary melanoma.

Results

Of the 56 929 study patients, 31 916 (56.1%) were female, with a mean (SD) age of 56.4 (16.2) years. A total of 54 645 single primary melanomas and 4967 multiple primary melanomas in 2284 patients were included. The median Breslow thickness decreased from 0.90 mm (interquartile range, 0.55-1.70 mm) for the first melanoma to 0.65 mm (interquartile range, 0.45-1.10 mm) for the second melanoma (P < .001). For their second melanoma, 370 patients (16.2%) had a higher T stage, 1112 (48.7%) had the same T stage, and 802 (35.1%) had a lower T stage. In addition, 841 of 2284 second melanomas (36.8%) in patients with multiple primary melanomas were found during the first year of follow-up, whereas 624 of 2284 (27.3%) were found after 5 years of follow-up. These proportions did not vary when stratified for melanoma stage. Worse overall survival was seen among patients with multiple primary melanomas compared with patients with a single primary melanoma (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.20-1.42; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

A significant decrease in Breslow thickness between the first and second multiple primary melanoma was found, and overall survival among patients with multiple primary melanomas was significantly worse than that among patients with a single primary melanoma. These findings suggest that more strict follow-up strategies may be warranted for patients with multiple primary melanomas.

Surveillance imaging for metastasis in high-risk melanoma: importance in individualized patient care and survivorship

Most patients newly diagnosed with melanoma have early-stage disease considered of good prognosis. However, with a risk of recurrence, appropriate follow-up may include surveillance imaging for early relapse detection. Previously, surveillance imaging to detect recurrences was considered unjustified, given the lack of effective treatments. Now, systemic therapies have improved, and patients with low tumor burden may derive benefit from surveillance imaging. Despite this, controversy exists regarding the role of surveillance imaging in early-stage melanoma survivorship, in part reflected by the lack of consensus on specific imaging protocols and broad guidelines. This review discusses published evidence on surveillance imaging to detect metastasis in high-risk melanoma, the need for early recurrence detection and implications for value-based clinical decision-making, survivorship care and multidisciplinary patient management.

Various Dermatoses What the Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma Had Anxiety for the Recurrence during Postoperative Surveillance

BACKGROUND

The incidence and mortality rates associated with cutaneous melanoma (CM) have steadily increased over the last 20 years. Even with successful treatment, melanoma patients usually experience substantial anxiety regarding the development of terrible recurrence. To date, few studies have investigated various dermatoses what the patients with CM had anxiety for the recurrence during postoperative surveillance (Dw).

OBJECTIVE

To describe various Dw and to evaluate the risk of subsequent malignant skin disease in patients with CM.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study between August 2002 and August 2015.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients presented with a total of 68 Dw. Among them, melanocytic nevus was the most common (n=27), followed by seborrheic keratosis (n=9) and CM recurrence (n=7). Approximately 5.6% of the lesions were diagnosed as malignant skin diseases. This was a single-center study, so the prevalence of malignant skin diseases following primary melanoma may not represent that of all patients with CM.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study can be referred by dermatologists dealing with melanoma especially when CM patients have too excessive or unrealistic anxiety for melanoma recurrence during postoperative surveillance of CM. However, the importance of postoperative surveillance must still be emphasized because of real risk of melanoma recurrence and other malignant skin.

Impact of Melanoma Diagnosis on Sun-Awareness and Protection: Efficacy of Education Campaigns in a High-Risk Population

Background:

Malignant melanoma is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Sun-awareness campaigns increase public knowledge but may not translate into behavioral changes in practice, which is particularly alarming when reported for individuals in high-risk groups. In particular, patients diagnosed with melanoma are at increased risk of developing subsequent primary melanomas compared with the general population.

Objectives:

The study was undertaken (1) to assess whether patients with known risk factors for developing melanoma had been exposed to preventative campaign messages prior to their diagnosis, (2) to quantify whether the diagnosis of melanoma changed sun-related attitudes and behavior, and (3) to assess the adequacy of sun-related advice given to patients with melanoma, as well as their compliance with the advice.

Methods:

Using an anonymous questionnaire, 217 patients previously diagnosed with melanoma were interviewed on the source and frequency of received sun-related advice, as well as on their knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward sun protection before and after the diagnosis.

Results:

The number of patients who reported receiving sun-related advice after being diagnosed with melanoma increased by 36% (52% pre-vs. 88% postDiagnosis), with advice being given more frequently and more often by a physician (19% pre- vs. 49% postdiagnosis). Furthermore, sun-related attitudes and behavioral practices were positively altered. Yet, patients with known risk factors were not preferentially targeted for advice before their diagnosis.

Conclusions:

The diagnosis of melanoma leads to increased sunwareness and protection. While dermatologists should continue their efforts to promote and reinforce sun-awareness in patients with melanoma, additional emphasis on preventative targeting of high-risk individuals would be of marked benefit in decreasing the overall incidence of melanoma. Non-dermatologists, such as family physicians, can be key players in this preventative campign, and can be educated to recognize and educate patients at risk, as well as direct them to be followed under dermatology care.

Multiple primary melanoma in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Few data exist regarding surveillance for multiple primary melanoma (MPM) in elderly patients or whether the incidence and risk factors are the same as for younger patients. Thus, we studied the frequency and characteristics of MPM in the elderly melanoma patients.

METHODS

From our prospective melanoma registry, we studied 222 consecutive patients aged 65 years or older at their initial melanoma diagnosis. Mean follow-up was 65 ± 3 months.

RESULTS

Median age was 76 years. Twenty-two patients (10%) developed a second primary melanoma and 8 (4%) of 3 or more primaries. 82% of second primaries (18 of 22) were the same or thinner than the index melanoma, yet 50% of third primary melanomas (4 out of 8) were thicker. Only prior dysplastic nevi (P <. 0001) were a significant risk factor for MPM.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest elderly melanoma patients have a significant risk of MPM that warrants careful surveillance to facilitate prompt detection and treatment. Patients with dysplastic nevi merit special scrutiny.

Risk of subsequent melanoma after melanoma in situ and invasive melanoma: a population-based study from 1973 to 2011

BACKGROUND

Patients with melanoma in situ are at an increased risk of subsequent melanoma compared with the general population, but the risk of subsequent melanoma after initial melanoma in situ versus after initial invasive melanoma is not known.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the risk of subsequent melanoma in the cohort whose first cancer was melanoma in situ to the risk in the cohort whose first cancer was invasive melanoma.

METHODS

In this cohort study, we identified individuals whose first cancer was either melanoma in situ or invasive melanoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program between 1973 and 2011 and used Cox proportional hazards models for comparison.

RESULTS

Compared with the invasive melanoma cohort, the melanoma in situ cohort was more likely to develop subsequent melanoma of any stage after 2 years, subsequent invasive melanoma after 10 years, and subsequent melanoma in situ at all the time points (P < .001, P = .003, P < .001, respectively).

LIMITATIONS

Underreporting of melanomas, particularly melanoma in situ cases, and missing cases of subsequent melanomas as a result of patient migration from the SEER registry areas could affect results.

CONCLUSION

Given the increased long-term risk of subsequent melanoma in the melanoma in situ cohort, the patients with melanoma in situ diagnosis may benefit from a long-term surveillance for subsequent melanomas.

Follow-up in patients with low-risk cutaneous melanoma: is it worth it?

Follow-up examinations in melanoma aim to detect recurrences or secondary melanomas in an early phase of development. Follow-up guidelines that have been developed in many European countries, the USA and Australia show varying recommendations and are controversial, especially in patients with melanomas of 1.0 mm tumor thickness or less. This group contains 50-70% of all melanoma patients and the majority is unlikely to develop recurrences. On the other hand, within this entity, subgroups at higher risk for recurrences can be defined who require a more intense follow-up. This article discusses recommendations for the frequency, duration and costs of follow-up in low-risk melanoma patients. Patient preferences are addressed and a risk-adapted follow-up scheme is proposed.

Variability in melanoma post-treatment surveillance practices by country and physician specialty: a systematic review

There are no evidence-based guidelines for the surveillance of patients with melanoma following surgical treatment. We carried out a systematic review to identify by country and physician specialty the current stage-specific surveillance practices for patients with melanoma. Three major medical indices, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library database, and Scopus, were reviewed to identify articles published from January 1970 to October 2011 that included detailed information about the surveillance of patients with melanoma after the initial surgical treatment. Data on surveillance intervals and recommended evaluation were extracted and categorized by country and, when reported, physician specialty. One hundred and four articles from 10 countries and four physician specialties (dermatology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, and general practice) fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 43 providing specific patient-level data. The articles showed a wide variation with respect to the surveillance intervals and recommended evaluations. The variation was greatest for patients with stage I disease, for whom the follow-up frequency ranged from one to six visits per year during years 1 and 2 after treatment. All four physician specialties agreed that for years 1-3, the follow-up frequency should be four times per year for all patients. For years 4 and 5, surgical oncologists recommended two follow-up visits per year, whereas general practitioners, dermatologists, and medical oncologists recommended four visits per year. Recommended imaging and laboratory evaluations were most intense in the UK and most minimalist in the Netherlands. Although general practitioners did not recommend routine laboratory or imaging tests for surveillance, all other specialties utilized both in their surveillance practice. Self skin-examination was recommended for surveillance in all countries and by all practitioner specialties. There are significant intercountry and interspecialty variations in the surveillance of patients with melanoma. As the number of melanoma survivors increases, it will be critical to examine the benefits and costs of various follow-up strategies to establish consensus guidelines for melanoma post-treatment surveillance.

Single versus multiple primary melanomas: old questions and new answers

BACKGROUND

In patients with multiple primary melanomas (MPM), mean tumor thickness tends to decrease from the first melanoma to the second melanoma, and prognosis may be improved compared with the prognosis for patients who have a single primary melanoma (SPM). In this study, the authors compared the clinicopathologic features of patients with MPM and SPM to better characterize the differences between these 2 groups and to determine whether or not there is an inherent difference in tumor aggression.

METHODS

In total, 788 patients with melanoma who were enrolled prospectively in the Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group database from 2002 to 2008 were studied. Patients with SPM and with MPM were compared with regard to clinical and primary melanoma characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 788 patients with melanoma, 61 patients (7.7%) had 2 or more primary melanomas. The incidence of developing a second primary melanoma 1 year and 5 years after initial melanoma diagnosis was 4.1% and 8.7%, respectively, and most of the risk accumulated within the first year. The incidence of MPM was greater in patients aged ≥60 years than in those aged ≤60 years. The absence or presence of mitosis and other tumor characteristics did not differ significantly between patients with SPM and patients with MPM (P = .61).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was observed in the presence or absence of mitoses, a marker of tumor proliferation, in SPM and MPM. Because it has been demonstrated that the presence of mitosis is a powerful prognostic marker, the current findings suggested that the tumors behave similarly in patients with SPM and patients with MPM. The authors concluded that differences in tumor thickness and prognosis between SPM and MPM more likely are caused by factors other than tumor biology, such as increased surveillance.

Clinicopathologic features of incident and subsequent tumors in patients with multiple primary cutaneous melanomas

BACKGROUND

0.6-12.7% of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma will develop additional melanomas. Pathologic features of tumors in patients with multiple primary cutaneous melanomas have not been well described. In this large, international, multicenter, case-control study, we compared the clinicopathologic features of a subsequent melanoma with the preceding (usually the first) melanoma in patients with multiple primary cutaneous melanomas, and with those of melanomas in patients with single primary cutaneous melanomas.

METHODS

Multiple primary melanoma (cases) and single primary invasive melanoma (controls) patients from the Genes, Environment and Melanoma (GEM) study were included if their tumors were available for pathologic review and confirmed as melanoma. Clinicopathologic characteristics of invasive subsequent and first melanomas in cases and invasive single melanomas in controls were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 473 pairs comprising a subsequent and a first melanoma and 1,989 single melanomas were reviewed. Forward stepwise regression modeling in 395 pairs with complete data showed that, compared with first melanomas, subsequent melanomas were more commonly contiguous with a dysplastic nevus, more prevalent on the head/neck and legs than other sites, and thinner. Compared with single primary melanomas, subsequent melanomas were more likely to be associated with a contiguous dysplastic nevus, more prevalent on the head/neck and legs, and thinner. The same differences were observed when subsequent melanomas were compared with single melanomas. First melanomas were more likely than single melanomas to have associated solar elastosis and no observed mitoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Thinner subsequent than first melanomas suggest earlier diagnosis, perhaps due to closer clinical scrutiny. The association of subsequent melanomas with dysplastic nevi is consistent with the latter being risk factors or risk markers for melanoma.

Review of diagnostic imaging modalities for the surveillance of melanoma patients

As melanoma survival rates continue to increase, optimal surveillance strategies for recurrences are needed, as are effective imaging modalities. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the current state of imaging modalities for surveillance of melanoma in the published medical literature to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values of ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and CT-PET combined. Ultrasonography was found to be the most sensitive and specific for detecting lymph node metastases, and PET-CT was the most sensitive and specific for detecting distant metastases. In addition to identifying appropriate surveillance methods, future studies should focus on the most effective and cost-effective intervals for performing these tests. In addition, the results from the meta-analysis related to sensitivity and specificity of the tests should be made available to doctors in community practice.

Primary bilateral malignant melanoma of the lower limbs

Malignant melanoma is the eighth most common cancer in European women. Its incidence is increasing rapidly and it has been demonstrated that this is related to sun exposure. Although few cases of bilateral uveal or choroidal melanoma are described in literature, there are no cases reporting bilateral cutaneous malignant melanoma. We report a singular case of a 43-year-old woman with two primary bilateral melanomas localized on the flexural surface of both legs.

Hazard rates for recurrent and secondary cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of 33,384 patients in the German Central Malignant Melanoma Registry

BACKGROUND

Knowledge about the risk for recurrence and secondary cutaneous melanoma (CM) is an important basis for patient counseling and planning of follow-up examinations.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze stage- and time-dependent hazard rates (HR) and discusses current surveillance recommendations.

METHODS

Follow-up data of 33,384 patients with incident CM in stages I to III (American Joint Committee on Cancer 2002) were recorded by the German Central Malignant Melanoma Registry in 1976 through 2007. Survival was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates and HRs were calculated.

RESULTS

Recurrences were recorded in 4999 patients (stage I, 7.1%; stage II, 32.8%; and stage III, 51.0%). Ten-year recurrence-free survival was 78.9% (95% confidence interval 73.1-90.5); in stage I, 89.0%; stage II, 56.9%; and stage III, 36.0%. Whereas HR for recurrent CM showed a constantly low level less than or equal to 1:125 per year for stage IA, clearly higher HRs of greater than or equal to 1:40 were recorded in stage IB for the first 3 years and generally in stages II to III. Of all patients 2.3% developed secondary melanomas, with a consistently low HR of less than 1:220 per year.

LIMITATIONS

As German recommendations discontinued regular follow-up examinations after 10 years, no information can be given beyond this time point. Follow-up data of longer than 5 years were available in 41.4% of patients.

CONCLUSION

For patients at stage IA with thin melanoma and low HR for recurrent CM the need for surveillance remains questionable. For patients with higher HR greater than 1:40 per year, intensified surveillance strategies should be taken into account.

Multiple primary melanoma: the impact of atypical naevi and follow up

BACKGROUND

Patients with melanoma are especially encouraged to have regular follow- up visits with their dermatologist and to perform total-body skin examination on a routine basis to identify new pigmented lesions or detect significant changes in existing naevi.

OBJECTIVES

To identify main risk factors (sex, age, number of common and atypical naevi, family history, phototype) associated with multiple primary melanomas (MPM) and to investigate the association between regular follow up and tumour thickness of a second primary melanoma.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with MPM in order to evaluate risk factors for developing a second primary melanoma. Medical records of patients with melanoma who developed a second primary melanoma were selected from a database of all patients with histopathologically confirmed melanoma treated at the dermatology clinic of the University of Florence, Italy, from 2000 to 2004. Medical data culled from the patient records were as follows: medical history, number of typical naevi, presence of atypical naevi, Breslow thickness, Clark level and histotype of the melanomas, site of the melanomas and patient adherence to 6-month follow-up examinations.

RESULTS

The presence of atypical naevi was associated with a higher risk of developing MPM (adjusted odds ratio 3·28, 95% confidence interval 1·35–7·44). Moreover, in the subjects who did not attend follow up, we noted that the thickness of the second melanoma was significantly higher, with a mean thickness of 1·22 mm, in comparison with patients with a careful adherence to follow up in whom the mean thickness was 0·36 mm (P = 0·0189).

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, the validity of this clinical approach has been supported by real comparison of thickness levels of second melanoma in patients with or without periodical follow up. Results obtained from this analysis show that follow up is an effective method for early detection of melanoma.

Detection of melanoma nodal metastases; differences in detection between elderly and younger patients do not affect survival

BACKGROUND

Melanoma lymph nodes metastases may be detected by patients or by physicians. Understanding the outcomes of self-detection or physician detection is essential for the design of follow-up studies. We evaluated the role of the method of detection in nodal disease in the prognosis of melanoma patients who underwent therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All melanoma patients with palpable lymph nodes were included in a prospective database (n = 98), and the method of detection was recorded. Detection of lymph node metastases compared with pathological findings in the TLND was assessed by multivariate logistic regression. Disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis.

RESULTS

Nodal metastases were detected by physicians in 45% and by patients in 55% (P < 0.001). Age was significantly associated with method of detection. Patients ≤60 years detected 69% their lymph node metastases as opposed to 32% of patients >60 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.3; P = 0.007). However, this was not associated with prognostic findings in TLND, number of positive nodes, tumor size, or extranodal spread. Method of detection or age at the time of nodal metastases was not significantly associated with 2-year DFS or DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

45% of all lymph node metastases in stage I-II melanoma patients are physician detected. Younger patients detect their own lymph node metastases significantly more often than elderly patients. However, neither the method of detection nor age correlates with DSS. More frequent follow-up would not alter DFS and DSS significantly.

Second Primary Melanomas: Incidence and Outcome

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of multiple primary melanomas (MPM) and other cancers types among patients with melanoma. Factors associated with development of MPM were assessed in a post hoc analysis of the database from a multi-institutional prospective randomized trial of patients with melanoma aged 18 to 70 years with Breslow thickness 1 mm or greater. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Forty-eight (1.9%) of 2506 patients with melanoma developed additional primary melanomas. Median follow-up was 66 months. Except in one patient, the subsequent melanomas were thinner (median, 0.32 mm vs 1.50 mm; P < 0.0001). Compared with patients without MPM, patients with MPM were more likely to be older (median age, 54.5 vs 51.0 years; P = 0.048), to have superficially spreading melanomas (SSM) ( P = 0.025), to have negative sentinel lymph nodes ( P = 0.021), or to lack lymphovascular invasion (LVI) ( P = 0.008) with the initial tumor. On multivariate analysis, age ( P = 0.028), LVI ( P = 0.010), and SSM subtype of the original melanoma ( P = 0.024) were associated with MPM. Patients with MPM and patients with single primary melanoma had similar DFS (5-year DFS 88.7 vs 81.3%, P = 0.380), but patients with MPM had better OS (5-year OS 95.3 vs 80.0%, P = 0.005). Nonmelanoma malignancies occurred in 152 patients (6.1%). Ongoing surveillance of patients with melanoma is important given that a significant number will develop additional melanoma and nonmelanoma tumors. With close follow-up, second primary melanomas are usually detected at an early stage.

Increased risk of second primary cancers after a diagnosis of melanoma

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the risk of subsequent primary cancers among patients with primary cutaneous malignant melanoma.

DESIGN

Population-based registry study.

SETTING

We evaluated data from 9 cancer registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program from 1973-2006.

PARTICIPANTS

We included 89 515 patients who survived at least 2 months after their initial melanoma diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of the patients with melanoma, 10 857 (12.1%) developed 1 or more subsequent primary cancers. The overall risk of a subsequent primary cancer increased by 28% (observed to expected [O:E] ratio = 1.28). One quarter of the cancers were subsequent primary melanomas (O:E = 8.61). Women with head and neck melanoma and patients younger than 30 had markedly increased risks (O:E = 13.22 and 13.40, respectively) of developing a subsequent melanoma. Second melanomas were more likely to be thin than were the first of multiple primary melanomas (thickness at diagnosis <1.00 mm, 77.9% vs 70.3%, respectively; P < .001). Melanoma survivors had increased risk of developing several cancers; the most common cancers with elevated risks were breast, prostate, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (O:E = 1.10, 1.15, and 1.25, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Melanoma survivors have an approximately 9-fold increased risk of developing subsequent melanoma compared with the general population. The risk remains elevated more than 20 years after the initial melanoma diagnosis. This increased risk may be owing to behavioral factors, genetic susceptibility, or medical surveillance. Although the percentage of subsequent primary melanomas thicker than 1 mm is lower than for the first of multiple primary melanomas, it is still substantial. Melanoma survivors should remain under surveillance not only for recurrence but also for future primary melanomas and other cancers.

[Detection of melanoma relapse: a retrospective study of 100 patients]

BACKGROUND

There is no international consensus on practical methods of monitoring melanoma following surgical removal of a primary tumour. The chief aim of such monitoring is to ensure detection of relapse where early diagnosis is crucial for survival (i.e. in-transit and lymph node metastases amenable to surgical removal) and the emergence of any first recurrence of primary melanoma.

AIM

The aim of our study was to identify the role of various agents and diagnostic tools both in first recurrence of primary melanoma and in clinical relapse of melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study covering all patients with in-transit or regional lymph node metastasis seen between January 2005 and December 2007. The type of recurrence and method of detection were studied.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients presented recurrence, with 66% of relapses comprising regional lymph node metastasis and 34% consisting of in-transit metastases. Thirty-three percent of cases of recurrence were detected by patients themselves, 21% by our department, 22% by a private dermatologist, 18% by a radiologist and 6% by a general practitioner. Fifty-four percent of recurrences among patients aged under 50 years were self-detected compared to 18% among patients aged over 70 years. A second melanoma was detected in six patients.

DISCUSSION

This study underscores the great importance of self-examination in melanoma follow-up with over one third of recurrences being self-detected by patients. Self-examination was more effective for younger patients, emphasizing the need to increase awareness among older patients. This study also demonstrates the essential part played by dermatologists in terms of regular follow-up of melanoma.

Detection of second primary cutaneous melanomas

AIMS

There have been few studies investigating the value of follow-up in the detection of second primary melanomas (SPMs) and there is scant information on the role of self-surveillance by the patient. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of patient detection of both first primary melanomas (FPMs) and SPMs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were interviewed to determine who detected their FPM and SPM (in situ or invasive). The associations between clinical and pathological factors and the person who identified the FPM and SPM were examined using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve patients with a recently diagnosed SPM were treated at the Sydney Melanoma Unit (July 2001 to March 2003). Patients detected 59% of the FPMs as compared with 46% of the SPMs. Female gender, greater Breslow tumour thickness and younger age were significant predictors for a patient-detected FPM (Odds Ratio: 4.9 (Confidence Interval 1.5-16.0), 3.2 (1.65-6.04), and 0.9 (0.9-1.0), respectively). Greater tumour thickness and ready visibility of the lesion to the patient were predicting factors for patient detection of a SPM (Odds Ratio: 1.9 (Confidence Interval 1.1-3.3) and 3.6 (1.4-9.1), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A history of melanoma does not increase the ability of patients to detect new or thinner primary melanomas themselves. Therefore, patients may benefit from regular clinical review by clinicians, who play an important role in the detection of new melanomas.

The importance of self-examination in the earliest diagnosis of multiple primary cutaneous melanomas: a report of 47 cases

BACKGROUND

Development of more than one primary melanoma in a patient is a relatively uncommon but well-recognized phenomenon. Its frequency has ranged from 1.2% to 8.2% in several series. This subgroup of patients with multiple primary lesions has not been characterized sufficiently. We report the experience of the Melanoma Unit of University Hospital Spedali Civili of Brescia, Italy.

METHOD

Study subjects were drawn from 1240 patients with histologically confirmed melanoma, including melanoma in situ. From this group, multiple melanomas developed in 47 patients (3.79%). Every one of our patients has been taught to perform self-examination of the skin to detect suspicious pigmented lesions.

RESULTS

Of the 47 patients described in this study, 38 had two primary melanomas, 7 had three melanomas and 2 had 5 and 10 melanomas, respectively. Mean age at first diagnosis was 46.2 years. The majority of subsequent melanomas (74.5%) were removed within 5 years of the initial operation. Synchronous lesions were found in 10 patients. In male patients, the lesion appeared most frequently on the trunk; in female patients, melanoma appeared mostly on the lower extremities. The second primary melanomas developed in the same anatomic region from the first in 53.2% of our patients. The proportion of in situ to invasive melanomas was greater for the second melanomas compared with the first melanomas. Regarding invasive melanomas, the mean thickness of the first melanomas was 1.31 mm compared with 0.66 mm for the second ones. Dividing patients into two groups, of more and less than 50, it is highlighted that in older patients synchronous lesions appear more frequently (36.4% vs. 8.0%); the median time interval between sequential melanomas is longer (84 vs. 63.7 months); and the ratio between the primary and secondary melanoma mean thickness is lower (1.21 : 1.08 vs. 1.43 : 0.63 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms that second primary melanoma is usually thinner than the first lesion, and it is more common in the same region of the body as the initial melanoma. The highest risk for a second melanoma is during the first 5 years, but a much longer time interval of 28 years is possible. Continued medical follow-up with complete skin examinations seems prudent, but it is very important to promote self-skin evaluation in patients to detect not only metastases but also subsequent primary melanomas in their earliest phases.

Screening and early detection of skin cancer

Skin cancer is the most common type of cancer in the United States. US incidence of malignant melanoma is increasing faster than any other type of cancer. To minimize increasing morbidity and mortality rates, it is imperative that appropriate screening and early detection of skin cancer become more widespread. All physicians who see patients clinically have the potential for detecting skin cancers. The scope of skin cancer as a health-care problem is discussed. Evidence for the effectiveness and necessity of skin cancer screening and early detection is presented. Costs of screening and detection are discussed in relation to impact on treatment costs and overall costs of skin cancer burden. Current methods and recommendations for skin cancer screening and detection are reviewed, especially with regard to individuals and populations that may require more specialized or intensive screening and follow-up. Newer approaches involving instrument-assisted screening and detection of skin cancer are under intense development, and these exciting emerging technologies are reviewed.

Detection of First Relapse in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients: Implications for the Formulation of Evidence-Based Follow-up Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The value of follow-up surveillance for patients with cutaneous melanoma remains uncertain. In this prospective study the frequency of detection of first melanoma recurrence (FMR) by patient or doctor was analyzed to assist in the future design of evidence-based follow-up guidelines.

METHODS

Patients who had a recurrence of a previously treated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I-III primary melanoma (PM) were interviewed to ascertain how their PM and FMR were detected. Factors predicting the detection of PM and FMR were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 211 patients. In 168 patients, information on detection of their PM was available; 102 PMs (61%) were detected by the patient and 18 (11%) by their partner. Higher AJCC stage, visible location for the patient, and female sex were independent predictive factors for patient-detected PM (P = .03, .002, and .02 respectively). The FMR type was local in 28 (13%), in transit in 35 (17%), in regional lymph nodes in 97 (46%), and distant in 51 (24%). Seventy-three percent of all FMRs were detected by the patient. The presence of a symptom was the only independent predictor of a patient-detected FMR (P < .0001). There was no statistically significant survival difference between the patient-detected and doctor-detected FMRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-quarters of FMRs were detected by patients or their partners, and it should be possible to improve this rate even further by better education. More frequent follow-up visits are thus unlikely to be valuable. Reductions in follow-up frequency may therefore be safe and economically responsible.

Prevalence and correlates of sun protection and skin self-examination practices among cutaneous malignant melanoma survivors

Little is known about the level of engagement and correlates of sun protection and skin self-exam among individuals diagnosed with melanoma. Participants (N = 229) completed measures of skin self-exam and sun protection practice and knowledge and attitudes. Approximately eighty-four percent of patients reported engaging in skin self-examination at least once in the past year. Engagement in sun protection practices was moderate. Self-exam practice was associated with gender, physician recommendation about self-exam, and perceived benefits and barriers of self-exam. Sun protection was associated with gender, age, medical status and health care access, physician recommendation, knowledge, and a number of psychological factors. Behavioral interventions to improve skin surveillance and sun protection may benefit from an emphasis on physician education regarding self-exam and sun protection, education regarding the efficacy of sunscreen and the risks associated with sunbathing, reducing perceived barriers to self-exam and sun protection, and reducing reliance on social influences on sun protection practices.

Breslow depth of cutaneous melanoma: impact of factors related to surveillance of the skin, including prior skin biopsies and family history of melanoma

BACKGROUND

Because the early detection of cutaneous melanoma can dramatically improve survival, identification and surveillance of persons at risk have received much attention.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to examine the influences of personal or family history, patterns of detection, and prior skin biopsies (considered to be a measurement of surveillance by medical personnel) on the Breslow depth of cutaneous melanomas.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of 218 patients with a history of at least one invasive cutaneous melanoma who visited the Yale Pigmented Lesion Clinic between January 1995 and January 1996 was performed. Data on patterns of detection, melanocytic nevi, and skin biopsies before and after the initial diagnosis of melanoma were collected, and patients with a family history of melanoma were compared with sporadic patients.

RESULTS

Initial melanomas discovered by dermatologists were more likely to be 0.75 mm or less in depth than those found by other physicians (P = .03). Although patients detected 45% of the initial primary melanomas (98/218), dermatologists discovered 80% of the second primary tumors (33/41; P = .001). A personal history of melanoma was predictive of a thinner Breslow depth (P = .01), but a family history of melanoma was not. Having a biopsy of any type or combination of types of skin lesion(s) performed in the 5 years, 2 years, or 1 year before the first diagnosis of melanoma did not predict a melanoma of thinner Breslow depth among either familial or sporadic patients. The mean number of skin biopsies performed per patient was 8 times higher in the 5-year period after (5.6) versus the 5-year period before (0.7) the initial diagnosis of melanoma, with a peak in the first year after the diagnosis (2.3 vs 0.25 in the prior year). In 27 patients, one or more skin biopsies were performed in the year before the initial diagnosis of melanoma; 41% of these biopsies (23/56) were of lesions in normally exposed sites (eg, the face, neck, and forearms) compared with 22% of the melanomas (6/27).

LIMITATIONS

Since an invasive melanoma (with the possible exception of a nodular melanoma) would likely have been present for at least a year, plausible explanations for why evidence of previous dermatologic care did not appear to result in earlier detection include performance of a limited rather than a total body skin examination as well as subtle clinical features of early melanomas. However, this study cannot give weight to these explanations because at the time new Pigmented Lesion Clinic patients were not routinely asked about previous total body skin examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

The disappointing trends seen in this study, with neither the well-established risk factor of a family history of melanoma nor previously having a skin biopsy predicting thinner melanomas, highlight the need to establish criteria defining the subset of patients for whom appropriate management requires periodic total body skin examination.

Follow-up in patients with localised primary cutaneous melanoma

Follow-up services for patients with localised cutaneous melanoma are widely discussed but there is no international consensus. Our aim was to discuss frequency and duration of follow-up, type of health professional involved, optimum intensity of routine investigation, and patients' satisfaction with follow-up. Searches of the published work were directed at publications between January, 1985, and February, 2004 on recurrences, subsequent primary melanoma, routine tests, and patients' satisfaction. In a selection of 72 articles, 2142 (6.6%) recurrences were reported, 62% of which were detected by the patients themselves. 2.6% of patients developed a subsequent primary melanoma. Most investigators do not support high-intensity routine follow-up investigations. Of the various follow-up investigations requested by physicians, only medical history and physical examination seem to be cost effective. Lymph-node sonography seems to be a promising method for detection, although survival benefit remains to be proven. Patients were found to be anxious about follow-up visits, although other research showed that provision of information to patients was much appreciated. Published work on the follow-up of patients with cutaneous melanoma has mainly been retrospective and descriptive. Recommendations can be given with only a low grade of evidence. For meaningful guidelines to be developed, prospective, high-quality methodological research is needed.

Impact of Melanoma Diagnosis on Sun-Awareness and Protection: Efficacy of Education Campaigns in a High-Risk Population

BACKGROUND

Malignant melanoma is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Sun-awareness campaigns increase public knowledge but may not translate into behavioral changes in practice, which is particularly alarming when reported for individuals in high-risk groups. In particular, patients diagnosed with melanoma are at increased risk of developing subsequent primary melanomas compared with the general population.

OBJECTIVES

The study was undertaken (1) to assess whether patients with known risk factors for developing melanoma had been exposed to preventative campaign messages prior to their diagnosis, (2) to quantify whether the diagnosis of melanoma changed sun-related attitudes and behavior, and (3) to assess the adequacy of sun-related advice given to patients with melanoma, as well as their compliance with the advice.

METHODS

Using an anonymous questionnaire, 217 patients previously diagnosed with melanoma were interviewed on the source and frequency of received sun-related advice, as well as on their knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward sun protection before and after the diagnosis.

RESULTS

The number of patients who reported receiving sun-related advice after being diagnosed with melanoma increased by 36% (52% pre-vs. 88% postDiagnosis), with advice being given more frequently and more often by a physician (19% pre- vs. 49% postdiagnosis). Furthermore, sun-related attitudes and behavioral practices were positively altered. Yet, patients with known risk factors were not preferentially targeted for advice before their diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of melanoma leads to increased sun-awareness and protection. While dermatologists should continue their efforts to promote and reinforce sun-awareness in patients with melanoma, additional emphasis on preventative targeting of high-risk individuals would be of marked benefit in decreasing the overall incidence of melanoma. Non-dermatologists, such as family physicians, can be key players in this preventative campaign, and can be educated to recognize and educate patients at risk, as well as direct them to be followed under dermatology care.

Geographic and Patient Variation in Receipt of Surveillance Procedures After Local Excision of Cutaneous Melanoma11Tables 4, 6, and appendix can be found at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/products/journals/suppmat/jid/jid22238/jid22238sm.htm

Little is known about variation in surveillance practices following the diagnosis of invasive melanoma. The objective of this study was to characterize geographic, patient, and tumor variation in the use of follow-up surveillance testing in patients with local or regional stage melanoma. A cohort of Medicare beneficiaries > or =65 y diagnosed with invasive melanoma during 1992 to 1996 living in a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry area was studied. Outpatient and inpatient Medicare claims 3 mo following diagnosis were examined for up to 2 y for surveillance procedures of interest. Use of chest X-ray, chest computed tomography scan, abdominal and/or pelvic computed tomography scan, abdominal ultrasound, head computed tomography scan, head magnetic resonance imaging, laboratory testing, and skin examinations were compared between patient groups and geographic regions. A total of 3389 patients were identified for the analysis. Surveillance testing was relatively common, ranging from 13% for abdominal ultrasound to 80% for laboratory testing. Follow-up skin examinations were performed in 70% to 90% of patients. The use of most surveillance procedures was associated (p<0.01) with younger age, male gender, regional stage tumors, and geographical area, with up to 2-fold differences observed. In contrast, there was much less variability in the receipt of skin examinations. Further studies are needed to determine the etiology and impact of such disparities, and the influence of surveillance procedures on morbidity and mortality.

Risk of second primary cancers, other than melanoma, in an Italian population-based cohort of cutaneous malignant melanoma patients

A population-based study has been carried out in central Italy to investigate the risk of further non-melanoma primary cancers in a cohort of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) patients. We considered 1835 invasive CMM cases (93.4% histologically verified) diagnosed between 1985 and 1999 by the Tuscany Cancer Registry, central Italy (1 200000 inhabitants) and actively followed up to the end of 1999 for vital status and for the occurrence of a second primary. Only cases diagnosed after 2 months (metachronous) from CMM diagnosis were considered. During 7758 person-years of observation, 94 cancers were observed (93.6% histologically verified) versus 73.8 expected, corresponding to a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 1.27 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.56). The risk was similarly increased in both sexes, males SIR=1.31 and females SIR=1.23, and it was statistically significant among subjects younger than 60 years (SIR=1.76) but not among those of 60 years and older (SIR=1.14). Significant increased risks were observed for non-melanoma skin cancers (SIR=3.26) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (SIR=2.74). Physicians should be aware of the higher risk for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and clinical follow-up should include lymph node palpation. However, the risk for extranodal lymphomas should also be kept in mind.

Close monitoring and lifetime follow-up is optimal for patients with a history of melanoma

Malignant melanoma, a potentially lethal form of skin cancer, is becoming more common each year in the United States and worldwide. The cure rate, however, is also increasing due to better education, earlier detection, and more effective treatment. Thus, there are more melanoma survivors who are at risk for recurrence of melanoma and also a second primary. Because there are few prospective screening and surveillance results in the medical literature, recommendations for follow-up of melanoma survivors have been based on the natural history of the disease, physical examinations, laboratory tests, and radiologic evaluations.

Biomarkers in melanoma: staging, prognosis and detection of early metastases

Currently, melanoma remains a surgical disease since early detection and excision of thin melanomas offers the best chance of a cure. Despite intensive clinical investigation, no effective systemic therapies exist for metastatic melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has greatly aided the staging and prognostic evaluation of primary cutaneous melanoma, however, approximately a third of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanomas present without prior regional lymph node involvement. Additional prognostic biomarkers exist which help determine the risk of advanced melanoma but the accuracy for each current marker is less than 100%. A greater understanding of the biology of melanomas and the development of new methods to identify patients with early (subclinical) metastatic disease may allow for selective and more effective therapy for patients at-risk for advanced disease. In this paper, current and novel potentially more accurate biomarkers for the staging and prognostic evaluation of melanoma patients, and for the detection of subclinical metastases are reviewed.

Current concepts in the management of patients with melanoma

Melanoma is a significant health problem. Despite public education and free cancer screenings, the incidence and mortality of melanoma continues to rise; however, many currently diagnosed melanomas are thin lesions, suggesting that education and awareness is having an impact. In addition, there are still subsets of patients who need increased surveillance in order to increase their survival. Although large congenital nevi may be precursors of melanoma, small and medium congenital nevi have an insignificant risk for melanoma development. Large congenital nevi, which are axial in location, appear to be more likely to develop melanoma and are associated with melanocytosis and melanoma of the CNS, both of which portend a poor prognosis. Recently, the recommended margins of excision have become more conservative so that many of the surgical defects can be closed primarily. Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy have replaced elective node dissections, thus decreasing the morbidity associated with the surgical management of melanoma. Although controversy still exists as to whether or not sentinel lymph node biopsy alters a patient's prognosis, it has been shown to be a powerful prognostic indicator. Although most melanomas are managed by routine surgical excision, other modalities are sometimes employed. For example, cryosurgery or radiation therapy may be indicated in the frail, elderly individual with a large facial lentigo maligna. Mohs surgery is the treatment of choice for head and neck melanomas and those located in areas where maximum preservation of tissue is required and for desmoplastic and acral lentiginous melanomas. Much more work remains in the area of adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Dacarbazine remains the drug of choice in disseminated melanoma, but remissions are usually short lived. Interleukin and biochemotherapy has yielded good results but the percentage benefiting is small. Although high dose interferon increases disease-free and overall survival in some patients, it remains a controversial drug which is not easily tolerated. In the new staging system for melanoma, ulceration is second only to Breslow's thickness. In transit (satellite) lesions have also been included in this new system. The new system also recognizes that patients with only microscopic metastatic nodal disease fare better than patients with clinically enlarged metastatic nodes and that it is the number of nodes involved with metastases, not their size, that determines the patient's prognosis. Except for lesions <1mm thick, the Clark's level of invasion has been de-emphasized.

Multiple synchronous cutaneous melanomas: implications for prevention

BACKGROUND

A subset of about 3-5% of melanoma patients present a second primary melanoma.

OBSERVATIONS

We describe two cases of primary multiple synchronous melanomas consecutively observed in the last 6 months in our department in two male patients presenting multiple atypical nevi. In both patients, the second melanoma was diagnosed by the clinician who had identified the first one, but at the time of the first follow-up consultation, 3 months later. The delayed discovery of the second melanoma required another referral for surgery with additional discomfort for the patients. Concern about the first lesion (the thickest in both cases) probably rendered the second one less evident to both patients and clinician, until the first follow-up examination after excision of the first lesion.

CONCLUSION

We stress the need for careful and thorough examination of the whole body surface at the time of detection of a cutaneous melanoma in subjects with multiple atypical moles because the finding of synchronous multiple melanomas is not uncommon.

Earlier diagnosis of second primary melanoma confirms the benefits of patient education and routine postoperative follow-up

BACKGROUND

Rising health care costs have caused providers to question the benefit of regular follow-up after treatment for patients with early stage cutaneous melanoma. The authors hypothesized that routine reassessment and careful education of these patients would facilitate earlier diagnosis of a subsequent second primary melanoma, as reflected by reduced thickness of that lesion.

METHODS

A prospective melanoma data base was used to identify patients who developed a second primary melanoma after treatment for American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage I or II cutaneous melanoma. After excision of the initial primary melanoma, all patients underwent routine biannual follow-up for new primary lesions. Follow-up consisted of a questionnaire and a complete skin examination by a physician. In addition, patients were regularly educated regarding the increased risk of developing a second melanoma. A paired t test was used to examine AJCC stage, thickness, and level of invasion of the initial melanoma compared with the second primary melanoma.

RESULTS

Of 3310 patients with AJCC Stage I or II melanoma, 114 patients (3.4%) developed a second primary melanoma. AJCC staging of both first and second melanomas was available in 82 patients (72%). When the AJCC stages of first and second melanomas were compared, 39 of 82 patients (48%) had lower stage second primary lesions, and 41 (50%) had same-stage second primary lesions. The mean tumor thickness was 1.32 +/- 1.02 mm for the initial melanoma, decreasing to 0.63 +/- 0.52 mm for the second melanoma; in fact, tumor thickness increased in only 4 of 51 patients (8%) whose records contained data for both first and second melanomas. Similarly, the level of invasion decreased in 60% of patients, remained the same in 27% of patients, and increased in only 13% of patients. By paired t test, the differences in AJCC stage, tumor thickness, and level of invasion between first and second melanomas were each highly significant (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the second primary melanoma in patients with a prior cutaneous melanoma was significantly thinner than the initial primary lesion. This is evidence that careful follow-up and patient education allow earlier diagnosis. All patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma should be counseled regarding the risks of second melanoma and should undergo lifelong follow-up at biannual intervals.

Multiple primary melanomas

BACKGROUND

Patients with clinically diagnosed dysplastic nevi or a family history of melanoma with or without histologically diagnosed dysplastic nevi seem to be at higher risk for the development of multiple melanomas.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine which factors increased the risk for the development of subsequent melanomas.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study in 56 patients with 157 melanomas.

RESULTS

Early age at onset (58.9%), clinically diagnosed dysplastic nevi (82.0%), a histologically diagnosed dysplastic nevus (64%), family history of clinically diagnosed dysplastic nevi (70.8%) or melanoma (64.7%) and a histologically diagnosed dysplastic nevus in combination with a family history of melanoma (48%) were found in a high percentage of patients. The mean age at diagnosis was 38.2 years. The mean interval between the first and second melanoma was 34.3 months. Of the second melanomas, 76.8% developed in a different anatomic region from the first melanomas. The mean tumor thickness (Breslow) decreased from 1.11 mm for the first melanomas to 0.90 mm for the second melanomas.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that genetic factors might be involved in a certain subset of patients in whom melanomas develop early and successively.

High frequency of multiple melanomas and breast and pancreas carcinomas in CDKN2A mutation-positive melanoma families

BACKGROUND

: Inherited mutations in the CDKN2A tumor suppressor gene, which encodes the p16(INK4a) protein, and in the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) gene confer susceptibility to cutaneous malignant melanoma. We analyzed families with two or more cases of melanoma for germline mutations in CDKN2A and CDK4 to elucidate the contribution of these gene defects to familial malignant melanoma and to the occurrence of other cancer types.

METHODS

: The entire CDKN2A coding region and exon 2 of the CDK4 gene of an affected member of each of 52 families from southern Sweden with at least two cases of melanoma in first- or second-degree relatives were screened for mutations by use of polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

: CDKN2A mutations were found in 10 (19%) of the 52 families. Nine families carried an identical alteration consisting of the insertion of arginine at position 113 of p16(INK4a), and one carried a missense mutation, in which the valine at position 115 was replaced with a glycine. The 113insArg mutant p16(INK4a) was unable to bind cdk4 and cdk6 in an in vitro binding assay. Six of the 113insArg families had at least one member with multiple primary melanomas; the 113insArg families also had a high frequency of other malignancies-in particular, breast cancer (a total of eight cases compared with the expected 2.1; P =.0014) and pancreatic cancer (a total of six cases compared with the expected 0.16; P<.0001). Families with breast cancer also had a propensity for multiple melanomas in females, suggesting that a sex-dependent factor may modify the phenotypic expression of CDKN2A alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

: Our findings confirm that the majority of CDKN2A-associated melanoma families in Sweden are due to a single founder mutation. They also show that families with the CDKN2A 113insArg mutation have an increased risk not only of multiple melanomas and pancreatic carcinoma but also of breast cancer.