An evaluation of malignancy and prognostic factors based on mode of lymph node metastasis in esophageal carcinoma

The Prognostic Impact of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The role of extracapsular lymph node involvement (ELNI) in esophageal cancer has not been fully investigated. We aim to assess its incidence and prognostic significance in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with and without neoadjuvant treatments.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent esophagectomy for ESCC in a single medical center was retrospectively reviewed. Patients with positive lymph node involvement were classified as either with ELNI or without ELNI (intracapsular lymph node involvement, ILNI). The impact of ELNI on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease recurrence was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 336 patients, including 179 without (NCRT -) and 157 with (NCRT +) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, were included. Seventy-two of 179 (40.2%) patients in NCRT - group were with positive lymph node, of whom 19 (26.4%) had ELNI, whereas 49 (31.2%) patients in NCRT + group had positive lymph node, of whom 25 (51.0%) had ELNI. In NCRT + group, patients with ELNI had worse outcome compared to those with ILNI in 5-year OS (10.4 vs. 13.8%, p = 0.008), and DFS (5.3 vs. 17.5%, p = 0.008). The presence of ELNI was also associated with more distant recurrence (p = 0.03). In contrast, there was no survival difference between patients with ELNI and ILNI in NCRT - group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ILNI, ELNI is a significant poor prognostic factor in patients with ESCC treated with neoadjuvant treatments, but not in those with primary surgery.

Prognostic Impact of Extracapsular Lymph Node Invasion on Survival in Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The extracapsular tumor extension (ECE) of nodal metastasis is an important prognostic factor in different types of malignancies. However, there is a lack of recent data in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition, the TNM staging system does not include ECE status as a prognostic factor. This systematic review and meta-analysis has been conducted to summarize and pool existing data to determine the prognostic role of ECE in patients with lymph node-positive NSCLC. Two authors performed an independent search in PubMed using a predefined keyword list, without language restrictions with publication date since 1990. Prospective or retrospective studies reporting data on prognostic parameters in subjects with NSCLC with positive ECE or with only intracapsular lymph node metastasis were retrieved. Data were summarized using risk ratios (RR) for the survival with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The data was analyzed using Mix 2 (ref: Bax L: MIX 2.0 - Professional software for meta-analysis in Excel. Version 2.015. BiostatXL, 2016. https://www.meta-analysis-made-easy.com ). There 2,105 studies were reviewed. Five studies covering a total of 828 subjects met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Two hundred and ninety-eight (35.9%) patients were categorized as ECE+, of whom 54 (18.1%) survived at the end of follow-up. In the ECE-negative group, 257 patients (48.4%) survived by the end of follow-up. Thus, ECE status is associated with a significantly decreased survival rate: pooled RR 0.45 (95% CI 0.35-0.59), Q ₍₄₎ = 4.06, P _value = 0.39, and I ² = 68.00% (95 CI 0.00-79.55%). In conclusion, ECE has a significant impact on survival in NSCLC patients and should be considered in diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in addition to the current TNM staging. Postoperative radiotherapy may be an option in ECE-positive pN1 NSCLC patients.

Extranodal extension of lymph node metastasis is a marker of poor prognosis in oesophageal cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis

The extranodal extension (ENE) of nodal metastasis is the extension of neoplastic cells through the nodal capsule into the perinodal adipose tissue. This histological feature has recently been indicated as an important prognostic factor in different types of malignancies; in this manuscript, we aim at defining its role in the prognosis of oesophageal cancer with the tool of meta-analysis. Two independent authors searched SCOPUS and PubMed until 31 August 2015 without language restrictions. The studies with available data about prognostic parameters in subjects with oesophageal cancer, comparing patients with the presence of ENE (ENE+) versus only intranodal extension (ENE-), were considered as eligible. Data were summarised using risk ratios (RRs) for number of deaths/recurrences and HRs together with 95% CIs for time-dependent risk related to ENE+, adjusted for potential confounders. Fourteen studies were selected; they followed-up 1437 patients with oesophageal cancer for a median follow-up of 39.4 months. The presence of ENE was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR=1.33; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.50, p<0.0001, I²=49%; HR=2.72, 95% CI 2.03 to 3.64, p<0.0001, I²=0%), cancer-specific mortality (RR=1.35; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.59, p=0.001, I²=57%; HR=1.97, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.75, p<0.0001, I²=41%) and of risk of recurrence (RR=1.50, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.88, p<0.0001, I²=9%; HR=2.27, 95% CI 1.72 to 2.90, p<0.0001, I²=0%). On the basis of these results, in oesophageal cancer, ENE should be considered from the gross sampling to the pathology report, and in future oncological staging system.

Expression of cytokeratin 34βE12 is a good indicator of tumor progression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is considered one of the most aggressive cancers with poor prognosis. The high molecular weight cytokeratin 34βE12 (CK34βE12) is recognized by the antibody, that is expressed in the cytoplasm of epithelial basal cells, and has been considered as a potential marker for prostate cancer, breast cancer, and basaloid carcinoma of the lung. However, there are no clinicopathological studies investigating CK34βE12 expression at the invasive front of ESCC. In this study, we examined 170 surgically resected cases of ESCC to clarify the clinicopathological significance of CK34βE12 expression. CK34βE12 expression was found in 85.3% (145/170) of ESCC cases and was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (66.2% [96/145], P = 0.034), depth of tumor invasion (57.9% [84/145], P = 0.042), and differentiation (82.1% [119/145], P = 0.013). These results indicated that CK34βE12 expression is a good indicator of lymph node metastasis, depth of tumor invasion, and differentiation in case of ESCC.

Lymph node metastases and prognosis in oesophageal carcinoma--a systematic review

Oesophageal cancer is the 7th most common cause of cancer-related death in the developed world and the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma is now the fastest growing of any gastrointestinal cancer. Lymph node involvement is the single most important prognostic factor in oesophageal cancer. Imaging to determine the extent of lymph node involvement and plan treatment often requires a combination of modalities to avoid under-staging. The 7th edition of the staging system released by the International Union Against Cancer (IUCC) has stratified lymph node involvement according to the number of lymph nodes involved and redefined its groupings for location of metastatic lymph node involvement. This review discusses the prognostic and treatment implications of these modifications and explores micrometastatic lymph node involvement, capsular infiltration and lymph node ratio as possible additions to the staging system.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: Impact on extracapsular lymph node involvement

AIM: To assess the effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on the presence of extracapsular lymph node involvement (LNI) and its prognostic value in patients with resected esophageal cancer.

METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-eight patients with advanced esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy between 1997 and 2006. One hundred and ninety patients (63.8%) were treated with neoadjuvant CRT prior to resection. A total of 986 metastatic LNs were examined. Survival of the patients was analyzed according to intra- and extra-capsular LNI.

RESULTS: Five-year survival rate was 22.5% for the entire patient population. Patients with extracapsular LNI had a 5-year survival rate of 16.7%, which was comparable to the 15.8% in patients with infiltrated nodes of the celiac trunk (pM1lymph). In contrast to patients treated with surgery alone, neoadjuvant therapy resulted in significantly (P = 0.001) more patients with pN0/M0 (51.6% vs 25.0%). In 17.6% of the patients with surgery alone vs 16.8% with neoadjuvant CRT, extracapsular LNI was detected. Neoadjuvant therapy does not reduce the occurrence of extracapsular LNI.

CONCLUSION: Extracapsular LNI is an independent negative prognostic factor not influenced by neoadjuvant CRT. In a revised staging system for esophageal cancer, extracapsular LNI should be considered.

A systematic review on the significance of extracapsular lymph node involvement in gastrointestinal malignancies

AIMS

The impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement (LNI) has been studied for several malignancies, including gastrointestinal malignancies. Aim of this study was to assess the current evidence on extracapsular LNI as a prognostic factor for recurrence in gastrointestinal malignancies.

METHODS

The Cochrane Database of systematic reviews, the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, and MEDLINE databases were searched using a combination of keywords relating to extracapsular LNI in gastrointestinal malignancies. Primary outcome parameters were incidence of extracapsular LNI and overall five-year survival rates.

FINDINGS

Fourteen manuscripts were included, concerning seven oesophageal, three gastric, one colorectal, and three rectal cancer series with a total of 1528 node positive patients. The pooled incidence of extracapsular LNI was 57% (95% CI: 53-61%) for oesophageal cancer, 41% (95% CI: 36-47%) for gastric cancer, and 35% (95% CI: 31-40%) for rectal cancer. In nine of the 14 studies a multivariate analysis was performed. In eight of these nine studies extracapsular LNI was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Extracapsular LNI is a common phenomenon in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. It identifies a subgroup of patients with a significantly worse long-term survival. This systematic review highlights the importance of assessing extracapsular LNI as a valuable prognostic factor. Pathologists and clinicians should be aware of this important feature.

Extracapsular lymph node involvement in node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction

In adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction, little attention has been paid to the biologic significance of extracapsular lymph node involvement (LNI). In the present study, a consecutive series of 251 patients with lymph node dissemination were reviewed. All patients underwent esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma and were prospectively followed. A total of 1562 positive lymph nodes were reexamined. Extracapsular LNI was identified in 456 lymph nodes (29%) in 166 patients (66%). Extracapsular LNI was confined to one lymph node in 63 patients (38%). The occurrence of extracapsular LNI increased significantly with the depth of invasion, presence of positive resectable truncal nodes, number of resected nodes, number of positive nodes, and lymph node ratio. The median potential follow-up period was 58 months (range, 12-143 months). In this period, 178 patients died of recurrent disease. The pattern of recurrence was comparable between patients with and without extracapsular LNI (P = 0.938). The median survival in patients with extracapsular LNI was 15 months (95% confidence interval, 12-18 months) compared with 41 months (95% confidence interval, 19-64 months) in those without extracapsular LNI (P < 0.001). Median survival of patients with 2 or more lymph nodes was 12 months (95% confidence interval, 8-15 months). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that T-stage, extracapsular LNI, and lymph node ratio were independent prognostic factors. The presence of extracapsular LNI identifies a subgroup with a significantly worse long-term survival. Together with the T-stage and the lymph node ratio, extracapsular LNI reflects a particularly aggressive biologic behavior and has significant prognostic potential.

Evaluation of prognostic significance in extracapsular spread of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Extracapsular spread of lymph node metastasis has been shown as a negative prognostic factor in cancers of several other organs. This study was performed to clarify the prognostic significance of extracapsular spread in patients receiving curative resection for gastric cancer.

METHODS

Extracapsular spread was defined as infiltration of cancer cells beyond the capsule of the metastatic lymph node. Four hundred and two patients who underwent curative gastrectomy were evaluated. Eight potential prognostic factors, including the International Union Against Cancer (Union International Contra la Cancrum; [UICC]) N stage and nodal status classified by the presence of lymph node metastasis or extracapsular spread, were examined.

RESULTS

Three survival curves grouped by nodal status differed significantly, and prognosis of patients with extracapsular spread was significantly worse than for the other groups. Both UICC N stage ( P < .001) and nodal status ( P < .001) were significant prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. UICC N stages were subcategorized by nodal status, and survival was shown to be significantly worse in patients with extracapsular spread in the UICC N1 group ( P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Extracapsular spread was a significant negative prognostic indicator on multivariate analysis, and may be useful in combination with UICC N stage. Extracapsular spread was regarded as an important indicator to refine the nodal staging system in gastric cancer.

Extracapsular lymph node involvement is a negative prognostic factor in T3 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

OBJECTIVE

To assess prognosis according to whether lymph node involvement is intracapsular or with extracapsular breakthrough in adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Materials and methods One hundred ninety-five consecutive patients with T3 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction between 1990 and 1999 were studied. All patients underwent primary R0 esophagectomy. The mean number of resected nodes per patient was 36.9. Survival was analyzed according to intracapsular and extracapsular involvement.

RESULTS

In N0 patients 5-year survival was 57% and 9-year survival was 38.7%. In patients with positive nodes these figures were 26.2% and 18.1%, respectively (P =.0069). Intracapsular and extracapsular node involvement showed 5- and 10-year survival of 40.9% and 21.7% versus 18% and 15.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5- and 10-year survival between N0 and intracapsular node involvement (P =.43). However, there was a significant difference in survival between N0 and extracapsular node involvement (P =.002) and between intracapsular and extracapsular node involvement (P =.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a significant difference in survival according to whether lymph node involvement was intracapsular or extracapsular. Patients with intracapsular lymph node involvement have similar survival rates as N0 patients. Extracapsular lymph node involvement is a bad prognostic factor, independent of the number of involved lymph nodes. The number of involved lymph nodes has an additive negative effect. These data may have an impact on treatment strategies.

Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy

OBJECTIVES

To examine the safety of transthoracic esophagogastrectomy (TTE) in a multidisciplinary cancer center and to determine which clinical parameters influenced survival and the rates of death and complications.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although the incidence of cancer at the gastroesophageal junction has been rising rapidly in the United States, controversy still exists about the safety of surgical procedures designed to remove the distal esophagus and proximal stomach. Alternatives to TTE have been proposed because of the reportedly high rates of death and complications associated with the procedure.

METHODS

Data from 143 patients treated by TTE by one author (1989-1999) were entered into a computerized database. Preoperative clinical parameters were tested for effect on death, complications, and survival.

RESULTS

The patient population consisted of 127 men and 16 women. One hundred twenty-one patients had a history of tobacco abuse, and 118 reported the regular ingestion of alcohol. One hundred fifteen patients had adenocarcinoma, 16 had squamous cell cancer, 6 had another form of esophageal tumor, and 6 had high-grade dysplasia associated with Barrett epithelia. Fifty-six patients had adenocarcinomas arising in Barrett epithelium. Twenty-eight patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation before surgery. Three patients died within 30 days of surgery (mortality rate 2.1%). Five patients (3.5%) had a documented anastomotic leak; three died). Overall, 42 patients had complications (29%). Twenty-six had pulmonary complications (19%). The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 3.35 days; the mean hospital length of stay was 13.54 days. The overall 3-year survival rate was 29.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

A high ASA score and the development of complications predicted an increased length of stay. The presence of diabetes predicted the development of complication and an increased length of stay. None of the other parameters tested predicted perioperative death or complications. Only disease stage, diabetes, and blood transfusion affected overall survival. From these results with a large series of patients with gastroesophageal junction cancers, TTE can be performed with a low death rate (2.1%), a low leak rate (3. 5%), and an acceptable complication rate (29%).