Gangrene and spontaneous perforation of the cecum as a complication of pseudo-obstruction of the colon: report of three cases and speculation as to etiology

Colonic perforation following major burns: Experience from a burns center and a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Major burns complicated by stress ulceration and perforation of the stomach or duodenum is a recognized clinical phenomenon. Colonic perforation in burns patients is not common, and the overall incidence, diagnosis, intervention undertaken and mortality is incompletely described in the literature.

METHOD

We performed a systematic review of the literature on severe burns resulting in colonic perforation during the initial admission period. Relevant studies from January 1975 to June 2020 were retrieved from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Patient demographics, co-morbidities, total body surface area (TBSA) and anatomical region of burn, site of colonic perforation and management, nutrition, sepsis and microbiology, length of stay and overall outcome were extracted. We present a case series of five burns patients who had colonic perforations in our Specialist Burns Center.

RESULTS

We identified 54 studies, of which nine (two case series and seven case reports) met the inclusion criteria. Colonic perforation following burns was most common in middle-aged male patients with a proportion of patients having a history of mental health issues. In most cases, the TBSA associated with a colonic perforation was ≥30% (11/16 patients, 69%). Perforations mainly affected the right side of the colon (12/16 patients, 75%), usually occurring after the second week of admission (13/16 patients, 81%). Right-sided colonic perforations were associated with an increased mortality rate compared to left-sided perforations (42% vs 25%).

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature is mainly limited to case series and case reports and confirms that colonic perforations in burns patients are rare. Colonic perforations are related to the systemic effect of burn injuries including sepsis and gastrointestinal stasis. We have identified patients who are at higher risk of developing colonic perforations and have described the common findings in these patients. Through greater awareness early diagnosis and prompt intervention may be achieved to improve outcomes and reduce associated morbidity and mortality.

Disruption of the network between Onuf's nucleus and myenteric ganglia, and developing Hirschsprung-like disease following spinal subarachnoid haemorrhage: an experimental study

Purpose/Aim of the study: Auerbach/Meissner network of lower abdominopelvic organs managed by parasympathetic nerve fibres of lumbosacral roots arising from Onuf's nucleus located in conus medullaris. Aim of this study is to evaluate if there is any relationship between Onuf's nucleus ischemia and Auerbach/Meissner network degeneration following spinal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Materials and Methods: Study was conducted on 24 male rabbits included control (Group I, n = 5), serum saline-SHAM (Group II, n = 5), and spinal SAH (Group III, n = 14) groups. Spinal SAH performed by injecting homologous blood into subarachnoid space at Th₁₂-L₄ level and followed three weeks. Live and degenerated neuron densities of Onuf's nucleus, Auerbach and Meissner ganglia (n/mm³) were determined by Stereological methods. Results: The mean degenerated neuron density of Onuf's nucleus was significantly higher in Group III than in Groups I-II (152 ± 26, 2 ± 1 and 5 ± 2/mm³ respectively, p < 0.005). The degenerated neuron density of Auerbach's ganglia was significantly higher in Group III than in Groups I-II (365 ± 112, 3 ± 1 and 9 ± 3/mm³ respectively, p < 0.005). The degenerated neuron density of Meissner's ganglia was significantly higher in Group III than in Groups I-II (413 ± 132, 2 ± 1 and 11 ± 4/mm³ respectively, p < 0.005). Conclusions: Onuf's nucleus pathologies should be considered as Auerbach/Meissner ganglia degeneration and also related Hirschsprung-like diseases in the future.

Ogilvie's syndrome

Four cases of Ogilvie's syndrome (acute colonic pseudo-obstruction) are reported. All occurred in the early puerperium following cesarean section and cesarean hysterectomy. In three of the patients, the diameter of the distended cecum was less than 9.0 cm and so management was conservative while in the fourth patient it was more than 9.0 cm, and so surgical intervention was carried out. A cecal diameter of 9.0 cm or above is an indication for surgical intervention to prevent possible colonic perforation. Other indications for surgery include established cecal perforation and failed conservative management. It is important that an early diagnosis is made and management instituted in order to prevent complications and associated high mortality.

Cecal perforation in thermal injury: case report and review of the literature

Gastrointestinal complications in burn patients include ileus, constipation, hemorrhage from ulcerations, ischemic bowel, and rarely, perforations. Patients with hypotensive episodes and sepsis are at risk for developing ischemic bowel disease. There have been three reports in the literature of cecal perforation in burn patients. We present an additional case and review of the literature.

Colonic pseudo-obstruction in burns patients

Acute pseudo-obstruction is a rare complication in burns patients. An awareness of the factors implicated in its pathogenesis such as prolonged bed rest, narcotic medications, hypokalaemia, sepsis and surgery (all commonly associated with burns patients) is essential if this condition is to be avoided. Early diagnosis, prokinetic and cathartic agents, and aggressive endoscopic intervention are essential to halt the progression of caecal dilatation. Excisional surgery and stoma formation are necessary for salvage of complicated colonic pseudo-obstruction.

Endoscopic decompression for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction

BACKGROUND

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction is often treated by colonoscopic decompression. Efficacy, safety, and outcome of endoscopic decompression was assessed.

METHODS

Colonoscopic decompressions from 1988 to 1994 were reviewed. Resolution without further endoscopic intervention was defined as clinical success.

RESULTS

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction was diagnosed in 50 patients. Thirty-three cases followed surgery or trauma and 17 developed during severe medical illness. Orthopedic joint surgery was most common. Nineteen of 50 patients (38%) had severe underlying medical disease. Forty-one patients (82%) had one colonoscopic decompression with clinical success in 39 (95%). Nine patients (18%) required multiple (2 to 4) colonoscopic decompressions with clinical success in 5 (56%). A decompression tube positioned in the right colon (57%) and in the transverse colon (33%) had similar clinical success. In 8 procedures a decompression tube was not placed, with poor clinical success (25%). The overall clinical success of colonoscopic decompression was 88% (44 of 50). An endoscopic perforation occurred in 1 patient (2%). Overall hospital mortality was 30%.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonoscopic decompression is effective and safe for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction that does not respond to conservative therapy. Most patients will respond to one colonoscopic decompression with decompression tube placement. Complete colonoscopy and cecal tube placement is unnecessary.

Long-term gastrointestinal problems in burns patients

Paralytic ileus occurs commonly in patients with over 20 per cent TBSA burns in the first few days after the burn. In the absence of sepsis, it is unusual for abdominal problems to develop later. We present an example of acute abdominal pseudo-obstruction occurring 5 weeks after a burn and review the management of this condition.

Ogilvie's syndrome: a potential complication of vaginal surgery

Ogilvie's syndrome is a well described disorder of the gastrointestinal tract and is characterized by marked dilatation of the distal colon without mechanical obstruction. There are numerous proposed etiologies for this syndrome, which include an association with certain medical conditions, medications and major abdominal surgery. The occurrence of Ogilvie's syndrome, however, is not widely reported following vaginal operations. We present 3 cases in which procedures on the bladder neck performed through the vagina resulted in the development of postoperative Ogilvie's syndrome. Early diagnosis and treatment of this syndrome are important to avoid significant morbidity and mortality.

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction

The syndrome of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction is well delineated but its aetiology remains poorly understood and patients are still treated inappropriately. This article reviews the pathogenesis and surgical management of this condition. Early diagnosis is stressed as a pivotal factor in reducing morbidity and mortality.

Ogilvie's syndrome of colonic pseudo-obstruction: a complication of radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy

Ogilvie's syndrome of colonic pseudo-obstruction has been reported in a wide variety of systemic disorders including blunt and surgical trauma but apparently not as a complication of radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Its occurrence following extensive paraaortic dissection in this case but no report so far of its occurrence after routine radical hysterectomy supports the most commonly proposed etiology of disturbed splanchnic nerve supply to the colon as a cause. Colonic pseudo-obstruction following radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy is reported and the etiology, diagnosis, and management are discussed to highlight the condition so that possible associated morbidity/mortality may be avoided.

Ogilvie's syndrome in the postcesarean section patient

Two cases of colonic pseudo-obstruction (the so-called Ogilvie's syndrome) are reported. Both patients were in the immediate postcesarean section puerperium. The importance of early diagnosis in these cases is stressed, because this complication has a high mortality rate, frequently in relation to delayed diagnosis and treatment. One patient was successfully treated with conservative measures because diagnosis was made early. A plain X-ray abdominal film which shows cecum dilatation, with or without ascending and transverse colon dilatation, and no distal air, makes the diagnosis. A cecum diameter of 9 cm or more is a surgical indication, because the possibility of wall perforation is high. Surgical techniques are: puncture decompression or cecostomy. When cecum diameter is less than 9 cm, non-surgical measures (nasogastric suction, correction of any fluid and electrolytic imbalance, and maybe a flatus tube) are indicated. Observation through repeated X-ray abdominal films shows when the surgical indication appears: (1) failure of the conservative treatment (cecal distension continues or increases); or (2) cecal perforation is documented.

Ogilvie's syndrome. Successful management without colonoscopy

We reviewed the clinical presentation, management, and outcome of 25 patients with Ogilvie's syndrome (acute colonic pseudoobstruction) at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1982 through 1985. All patients had cancer and severe associated medical problems. Abdominal x-rays uniformly showed cecal distension ranging between 9 and 18 cm. Twenty-four of the 25 patients were treated with conservative nonendoscopic management. One patient had an exploratory laparotomy for prophylactic cecostomy after only one day of conservative therapy. Of the 24 patients treated conservatively, 23 (96%) improved by both clinical and radiologic criteria in a mean of 3.0 days. The remaining patient died of multisystem failure not related to the acute colonic pseudoobstruction. Colonoscopic decompression was not attempted in any of the 25 patients. There were no colonic perforations, and there were no pseudoobstruction-related deaths. This study questions the need for early endoscopic or surgical treatment in cancer patients with acute colonic pseudoobstruction.

Treatment of acute nontoxic megacolon during colonoscopy: tube placement versus simple decompression

The study compares the efficacy of colonoscopic decompression versus decompression and tube placement in the treatment of Ogilvie's syndrome. Nine patients were treated with a single colonoscopic decompression which resulted in four recurrences. In contrast, there were no recurrences observed in 11 patients who underwent decompression and subsequent tube placement (p less than 0.05). There was no morbidity observed from either decompression or tube placement. Tube placement added less than 10 min of additional procedure time to the colonoscopy. The tube utilized in this study was an enteroclysis tube with sideholes cut in the distal 20 cm. The tube was easily inserted over a Teflon-coated flexible guide wire inserted through the colonoscope into the cecum following decompression. This study demonstrates that colonoscopic decompression followed by tube placement is the preferred treatment modality for acute nontoxic megacolon.

Acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon in a kidney-transplanted patient (Ogilvie's syndrome)

Ogilvie's syndrome is an acute massive dilation of the large bowel without organic obstruction. It can occur from a variety of causes and organ failures. We report on the first patient who has developed this syndrome twice, in both cases after kidney transplantation. The world literature concerning the subject is also reviewed.

Massive colonic dilatation as initial presentation of mesenteric vein thrombosis

The case of a patient with primary mesenteric venous thrombosis presenting with massive dilatation of almost the entire colon is described. The differential diagnosis suggested by this presentation is briefly discussed with special attention to the diagnosis of acute colonic pseudoobstruction. Possible reasons for the atypical presentation of acute mesenteric venous thrombosis should, therefore, be considered in the differential diagnosis of all patients presenting with colonic distention and pseudoobstruction.

Acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon (Ogilvie's syndrome). An analysis of 400 cases

This study analyzes 400 cases of acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon (Ogilvie's syndrome). Seven cases were reported at St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical Center between October 1982 and February 1985; 393 cases were reported in the literature from 1970-1985. Ogilvie's syndrome is most commonly reported in patients in the sixth decade, and is more predominant in men. It is caused by an unknown disturbance to the autonomic innervation of the distal colon, and is associated with different conditions. Plain abdominal roentgenogram is the most useful diagnostic test. If the cecal diameter is 12 cm or greater, or conservative management is unsuccessful, colonoscopic or operative decompression is needed. The mode of treatment, age, cecal diameter, delay in decompression, and status of the bowel significantly influence the mortality rate, which is approximately 15 percent with early appropriate management, compared with 36 to 44 percent in perforated or ischemic bowel.

Pseudoobstruction of the colon complicating choriocarcinoma

Colonic pseudoobstruction is an enigmatic condition which can mimic mechanical obstruction clinically and lead to spontaneous cecal perforation. A patient who was treated for choriocarcinoma developed colonic pseudoobstruction and appropriate evaluation permitted nonsurgical management. The etiologies, diagnosis, and management of colonic pseudoobstruction are discussed.

Colonic pseudo-obstruction in surgical patients

Colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome) may occur in surgical patients, particularly those who have had orthopedic or blunt trauma, have uremia or diabetes, have complex metabolic or cardiac failure, have metastatic cancer involving the lymph nodes and neural tissue, or are addicted to narcotics. Although a single true cause has not been identified by fulfilling Koch's postulates, the clinical pattern has been recognized in a variety of surgical patients, and this pattern must be distinguished from true obstruction of the colon. Tumor or internal hernia may constitute an obstruction, but the important differential diagnosis of cecal volvulus must be excluded. Ischemic colitis may be confused with Ogilvie's syndrome or may follow it. Gangrene, infarction, and perforation may ensue as colon diameter increases and particularly if cecal distention reaches above 14 cm. This arbitrary number for cecal dilatation should not be awaited before treatment is instituted if signs of devitalization of the gut or peritoneal signs have developed in the patient. Treatment has changed recently with the widespread application of colonoscopy. Endoscopy is helpful in relieving distention but may also be dangerous in the patient with a massively distended colon, particularly at the level of the thin-walled cecum. Colonoscopy also appears to be associated with a high rate of treatment failure and recurrence. Surgical decompression may take the form of cecostomy or may require exteriorization or resection of the colon if infarction has occurred. A series of 12 patients has been presented. The patients were all referred to a single surgeon in a university medical center over a 4 1/2 year period with clinical patterns not suggestive of a common cause but a similar clinical evolution of Ogilvie's syndrome. The prognosis for such patients in whom the complication is recognized early and in whom decompression is performed endoscopically or surgically is encouraging. If recognition is late and particularly if perforation and gangrene result, mortality is nearly 50 percent.

Ogilvie's syndrome (acute colonic pseudo-obstruction): review of the literature (October 1948 to March 1980) and report of four additional cases

Four additional cases of Ogilvie's syndrome (acute colonic pseudo-obstruction), representing the first cases described in Italy, are reported. The medical literature concerning the subject is also thoroughly reviewed. Ogilvie's syndrome is an acute massive dilatation of the large bowel without organic obstruction of the distal colon. Three hundred and fifty-one cases have been described in the literature to date. Eighty-eight per cent of the cases were associated with various extracolonic affections (metabolic and organ dysfunctions, postoperative and posttraumatic states, etc.). Twelve per cent of cases were not associated with known disorders and were defined as idiopathic. The pathophysiology of the syndrome is still unknown. Ogilvie, who first described the syndrome in 1948, suggested an imbalance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of the colon: this neurogenic hypothesis has been shared by other authors, although explanations may differ slightly. The clinical and radiologic picture closely resembles mechanical obstruction of the large bowel. The most marked dilatation usually takes place in the right colon and cecum: if the distended cecum reaches a diameter larger than 9 to 12 cm, perforation is likely to occur; if perforation occurs, the mortality rate increases from 25 to 31 per cent to about 43 to 46 per cent. If conservative management fails to control the dilatation and cecal rupture is impending or suspected emergency surgery is indicated, the surgical procedure of choice is dictated by the general conditions of the patient as well as by the intestinal findings: operation may consist of cecostomy, colostomy, or right hemicolectomy or simply emptying the bowel.