Simultaneous extensive resection of the liver and the pancreas in dogs

Right portal vein ligation is still relevant for left hemi-liver hypertrophy: results of a comparative study using a propensity score between right portal vein ligation and embolization

BACKGROUND

In two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer, future liver remnant (FLR) growth can be achieved using several techniques, such as right portal vein ligation (RPVL) or right portal vein embolization (RPVE). A few heterogeneous studies have compared these two techniques with contradictory results concerning FLR growth. The objective of this study was to compare FLR hypertrophy of the left hemi-liver after RPVL and RPVE.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective comparative study using a propensity score of patients who underwent RPVL or RPVE prior to major hepatectomy between January 2010 and December 2020. The endpoints were FLR growth (%) after weighting using the propensity score, which included FLR prior to surgery and the number of chemotherapy cycles. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of patients undergoing simultaneous procedures, the morbidity and mortality, the recourse to other liver hypertrophy procedures, and the number of invasive procedures for the entire oncologic program in intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-four consecutive patients were retrospectively included and analyzed, 18 in the RPVL group, and 36 in the RPVE group. The demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. After weighting, there was no significant difference between the RPVL and RPVE groups for FLR growth (%), respectively 32.5% [19.3-56.0%] and 34.5% [20.5-47.3%] (p = 0.221). There was no significant difference regarding the secondary outcomes except for the lower number of invasive procedures in RPVL group (median of 2 [2.0, 3.0] in RPVL group and 3 [3.0, 3.0] in RPVE group, p = 0.001)).

CONCLUSION

RPVL and RPVE are both effective to provide required left hemi-liver hypertrophy before right hepatectomy. RPVL should be considered for the simultaneous treatment of liver metastases and the primary tumor.

Radiological Simultaneous Portohepatic Vein Embolization (RASPE) Before Major Hepatectomy: A Better Way to Optimize Liver Hypertrophy Compared to Portal Vein Embolization

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare portal vein embolization (PVE) and radiologica simultaneous portohepatic vein embolization (RASPE) for future liver remnant (FLR) growth in terms of feasibility, safety, and efficacy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

After portal vein embolization (PVE), 15% of patients remain ineligible for hepatic resection due to insufficient hypertrophy of the FLR. RASPE has been proposed to induce FLR growth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2016 and 2018, 73 patients were included in the study. RASPE was proposed for patients with a ratio of FLR to total liver volume (FLR/TLV) of <25% (RASPE group). This group was compared to patients who underwent PVE for a FLR/TLV <30% (PVE group). Patients in the 2 groups were matched for age, sex, type of tumor, and number of chemotherapy treatments. FLR was assessed by computed tomography before and 4 weeks after the procedure.

RESULTS

The technical success rate in both groups was 100%. Morbidity post-embolization, and the time between embolization and surgery were similar between the groups. In the PVE group, the FLR/TLV ratio before embolization was 31.03% (range: 18.33%-38.95%) versus 22.91% (range: 16.55-32.15) in the RASPE group (P < 0.0001). Four weeks after the procedure, the liver volume increased by 28.98% (range: 9.31%-61.23%) in the PVE group and by 61.18% (range: 23.18%-201.56%) in the RASPE group (P < 0.0001). Seven patients in the PVE group, but none in the RASPE group, had postoperative liver failure (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

RASPE can be considered as "radiological associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy." RASPE induced safe and profound growth of the FLR and was more efficient than PVE. RASPE also allowed for extended hepatectomy with less risk of post-operative liver failure.

Liver hypertrophy: Underlying mechanisms and promoting procedures before major hepatectomy

Various procedures can promote hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) before major hepatectomy to prevent postoperative liver failure. The pathophysiological situation following portal vein embolization (PVE), hepatic artery ligation/embolization or hepatectomy remains unclear. On one hand, the main mechanisms of hepatic regeneration appear to be driven by hepatic hypoxia (involving the hepatic arterial buffer response), an increased portal blood flow inducing shear stress and the involvement of several mediators (inflammatory cytokines, vasoregulators, growth factors, eicosanoids and several hormones). On the other hand, several factors are associated with impaired liver regeneration, such as biliary obstruction, malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, male gender, age, ethanol and viral infection. All these mechanisms may explain the varying degrees of hypertrophy observed following a surgical or radiological procedure promoting hypertrophy the FLR. Radiological procedures include left and right portal vein embolization (extended or not to segment 4), sequential PVE and hepatic vein embolization (HVE), and more recently combined PVE and HVE. Surgical procedures include associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, and more recently the combined portal embolization and arterial ligation procedure. This review aimed to clarify the pathophysiology of liver regeneration; it also describes radiological or surgical procedures employed to improve liver regeneration in terms of volumetric changes, the feasibility of the second step and the benefits and drawbacks of each procedure.

Percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization: rationale, technique, and outcomes

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is used to induce preoperative liver hypertrophy in patients with anticipated marginal future liver remnant (FLR) volumes who are otherwise potential candidates for resection. PVE can be performed utilizing the transhepatic contralateral and ipsilateral approaches. The transhepatic contralateral approach is the most commonly used technique worldwide, largely owing to its technical ease. However, the contralateral approach risks injuring the FLR, thereby compromising the planned surgical resection. The transhepatic ipsilateral approach offers a potentially safer alternative because the complications associated with this approach affect only the hepatic lobe that will be resected and are usually not serious enough to preclude surgery. This article discusses PVE using the transhepatic ipsilateral and contralateral approaches, including patient selection criteria, anatomical and technical considerations, and patient complications and outcomes.

Portal vein embolization: rationale, outcomes, controversies and future directions

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is now considered the standard of care to improve safety for patients undergoing extensive hepatectomy with an anticipated small future liver remnant (FLR). PVE is used to induce contralateral liver hypertrophy in preparation for major liver resection. Optimal patient selection is essential to maximize the clinical benefits of PVE. Computed tomography volumetry is used to calculate a standardized FLR and determine the need for preoperative PVE. Percutaneous PVE can be performed via the transhepatic ipsilateral or contralateral approaches, depending on operator preference. Several different embolic agents are available to the interventional radiologist, all with similar effectiveness in inducing hypertrophy. When an extended hepatectomy is planned, right PVE should include segment 4, in order to maximize FLR hypertrophy. Multiple studies have demonstrated the beneficial outcomes of PVE in both patients with healthy livers and with underlying liver diseases. Novel improvements to PVE should expand its scope to patients who were previously not candidates for the procedure.

Animal models in pancreatic surgery: a plea for pork

There has been resurgence in the utilization of larger animal models in medicine over the last decade, particularly in the field of pancreatic research. With increasing pressures to more accurately replicate the human model prior to clinical application, an ideal animal model is necessary. Previous work in larger species (dog, pig) in pancreatic surgery research has identified several key anatomical differences that have led us to conclude that perhaps the swine is a model better fit for more accurate human representation.

Mechanisms of hepatic regeneration following portal vein embolization and partial hepatectomy: a review

BACKGROUND

Portal vein embolization (PVE) improves outcome following major hepatectomy, and basic studies have presented evidence related to the mechanisms responsible for hepatic regeneration. Hemodynamic changes following PVE are similar to, but slightly different from, those of partial hepatectomy (PH) because arterial flow to the embolized lobe is preserved. However, the process of hepatic regeneration is essentially the same after both PVE and PH. A number of mediators are involved in PVE or PH-induced hepatic regeneration. These include inflammatory cytokines, vasoregulators, growth factors, eicosanoids, and various hormones. These mediators activate a complex network of signal transduction that promotes hepatic regeneration. A variety of conditions have been shown to modulate the function of these mediators and inhibit regeneration. These include biliary obstruction, diabetes, chronic ethanol consumption, malnutrition, gender, aging, and infection.

CONCLUSION

Optimizing these factors, where possible, before PVE or PH, is essential to maximize hypertrophy of the liver. A fuller understanding of hepatic physiology and pathophysiology following PVE or PH may lead to greater functional capacity of the remaining liver and extend the indications for hepatectomy in patients who require large liver volume resection.

Vacuolar hepatocyte degeneration induced by infusion of 20% glucose solution with insulin after hepatopancreatectomy in rats

To investigate the causes of hepatic dysfunction after extensive resection of the liver together with pancreatectomy, rats were subjected to sham operation, to 68% hepatectomy alone, to 90% pancreatectomy alone, or to 68% hepatectomy combined with 90% pancreatectomy (hepatopancreatectomy). Solutions of 5% or 20% glucose were infused post-operatively for 48 h at a constant rate (250 ml/kg body weight/day) under fasting conditions. To improve the survival rates of pancreatectomized and hepatopancreatectomized rats given 20% glucose, it was necessary to use insulin. In hepatopancreatectomized rats, infusion of 20% glucose with insulin (1 U/5 g glucose) induced prominent hepatocyte vacuolar degeneration and mitochondrial swelling, associated with reduced hepatic protein content. The severity of histological changes was proportional to the insulin dose and the activity of hepatic glucokinase, a key glycolytic enzyme. were observed in These histological changes pancreatectomized rats albeit in a milder form, but not in sham-operated or hepatectomized rats given 20% glucose nor in any rats given 5% glucose. Our results suggest that hepatopancreatectomy followed post-operatively by a high glucose load and exogenously administered insulin enhances the development of hepatocyte swelling.

Hepatic protein synthesis in the regenerating rat liver after hepatopancreatectomy

To evaluate the effects of hepatopancreatectomy on the regenerative process of the liver, the serum protein changes, hepatic protein synthesis (HPS), and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling index were measured in rats. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups according to the type of resection: A simple laparotomy was performed in the sham group; 68% of the liver was excised in the Hx group; 45% of the pancreas was excised in the Px group; and 45% of the pancreas and 68% of the liver were excised simultaneously in the HPx group. Serum total protein and albumin levels were significantly lower in the HPx group compared to the other three groups on postoperative day (POD) 3 (P < 0.05). HPS was markedly increased in the Hx and HPx groups. In the Hx group, it was significantly higher, peaking on POD 2, compared to the HPx group (P < 0.05), while in the HPx group, it was significantly higher compared to the Hx group (P < 0.05), peaking on POD 3. The BrdU labeling index, as a marker of DNA synthesis, was significantly suppressed in the HPx group on POD 1 compared to the Hx group (P < 0.05). Thus, compared to hepatectomy alone, hepatopancreatectomy suppresses DNA synthesis, causing a delay in the increase of protein synthesis in the regenerating liver, resulting in a more marked decrease in the serum protein level.