Complications requiring reoperation following pancreatectomy

One hundred most cited article related to pancreaticoduodenectomy surgery: A bibliometric analysis

BACKGROUND

In light of the challenges associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and recent key improvements, this bibliometric analysis aimed to analyze the 100 top-cited (T100) articles related to PD surgery to widen the awareness of relevant research on this procedure.

METHODS

The term "pancreaticoduodenectomy" was used to retrieve articles from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The 100 most cited manuscripts in the English language were identified and further analyzed by their countries of origin, publication journals, authors, and themes.

RESULTS

A thorough literature search was performed on the Web of Science until April 2020. The total number of citations for the T100 articles ranged from 227 to 3029. The T100 articles came from 18 different countries, with the USA accounting for the plurality (n = 72). Professor J.L. Cameron from Johns Hopkins Medicine USA published the most articles (n = 22), including one as the first author and two as a co-author. Furthermore, Johns Hopkins Medicine, USA, published the most articles on PD surgery (n = 24), with a total citation count of 14,151. The journal Annals of Surgery published 40 of the T100 articles, with 15,847 citations and an average citation count of 396. Among the T100 articles, the citation frequency following the year of publication showed a parabolic trend, with citations peaking in the 9th year following publication.

CONCLUSION

Our study identified and analyzed the T100 articles in PD surgery. The USA was the dominant country regarding articles, researchers, and institutions. The citations of the articles peaked in the 9th year after publication.

Drain or No Drain Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Unsolved Dilemma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is no consensus regarding the routine placement of intra-abdominal drains after pancreaticoduodenectomy. We aim to determine the effects of intraperitoneal drain placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy on 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic tumors were identified from the 2014-2015 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Univariate and multivariate analyses adjusting for known prognostic variables were performed. A subgroup analysis was performed based on the risk for development of postoperative pancreatic leak determined by the pancreatic duct caliber, parenchymal texture, and body mass index.

RESULTS

A total of 6858 patients with pancreatic tumors who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were identified in the 2014-2015 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database dataset. In all, 87.4% of patients had intraperitoneal drains placed. A 30-day mortality rate was higher in the no-drain group (2.9% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.003). Patients in the drain group had a higher incidence of overall morbidity (49.5% vs. 41.2%, P = 0.0008), delayed gastric emptying (18.1% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.004), pancreatic fistulae (19.4% vs. 9.9%, P ⩽ 0.0001), and prolonged length of hospital stay over 10 days (43.7% vs. 34.9%, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis based on risk categories revealed a higher 30-day mortality rate in the no-drain group among patients with high-risk features (3.1% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.02). Delayed gastric emptying and pancreatic fistula development remained significantly higher in the drain group only in the high-risk category. Prolonged length of hospital stay and composite morbidity remained higher in the drain group regardless of the risk category.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date that aims at clarifying the pros and cons of the intraperitoneal drain placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic tumors. We showed a higher 30-day mortality rate if drain insertion was omitted during pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with softer pancreatic textures, smaller pancreatic duct caliber, and body mass index over 25. Postoperative 30-day morbidity rate was higher if a drain was inserted regardless of the risk category. Further randomized controlled trials with prospective evaluation of stratification factors for fistula risk are needed to establish a clear recommendation.

[External pancreatic fistulas management]

The main principles of treatment of external postoperative pancreatic fistulas are viewed in the article. Pancreatic trauma was the reason of pancreatic fistula in 38.7% of the cases, operations because of acute pancreatitis - in 25.8%, and pancreatic pseudocyst drainage - in 35.5%. 93 patients recovered after the treatment. Complex conservative treatment of EPF allowed to close fistulas in 74.2% of the patients with normal patency of the main pancreatic duct (MPD). The usage of octreotide 600-900 mcg daily for at least 5 days to decrease pancreatic secretion was an important part of the conservative treatment. Endoscopic papillotomy was performed in patients with major duodenal papilla obstruction and interruption of transporting of pancreatic secretion to duodenum. Stent of the main pancreatic duct was indicated in patients with extended pancreatic duct stenosis to normalize transport of pancreatic secretion to duodenum. Surgical formation of anastomosis between distal part of the main pancreatic duct and gastro-intestinal tract was carried out when it was impossible to fulfill endoscopic stenting of pancreatic duct either because of its interruption and diastasis between its ends, or in the cases of unsuccessful conservative treatment of external pancreatic fistula caused by drainage of pseudocyst.

Risk Factors of Reoperation After Pancreatic Resection

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic resection is associated with a high incidence of postoperative complications, some of which require reoperation.

AIMS

To analyze the incidence of and risk factors for reoperation following pancreatectomy.

METHODS

Pre- and postoperative information and procedure characteristics of 15,549 patients having undergone pancreatectomy in 435 hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2011 to 2014 were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 773 (5.0%) patients required reoperation within 30 days of their index pancreatectomy. Patients requiring reoperation were more likely to be younger (mean ± standard deviation, 62.6 ± 13.2 vs. 64.1 ± 12.2 years, p < 0.001), male (60 vs. 49%, p < 0.001), to have respiratory comorbidities, lower preoperative serum albumin (3.7 ± 0.68 vs. 3.8 ± 0.62 mg/dl, p < 0.001), higher total bilirubin (1.7 ± 2.7 vs. 1.5 ± 2.4 mg/dl, p = 0.02), and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class than those who did not undergo reoperation. Other factors associated with increased incidence of reoperation included longer mean operative duration at the index procedure, postoperative transfusion requirement, wound complications, and cardiorespiratory, renal, thromboembolic, and infectious events. Multivariate regression analysis identified male sex, preoperative serum albumin <3.5 mg/dl, ASA class of 3 or 4, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and total pancreatectomy as the strongest predictors for reoperation after index pancreatic resection. Complication and readmission rates were significantly higher for those undergoing reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Patient characteristics and procedural factors contribute to reoperation after pancreatectomy in this largest and most diverse sample to date. Further investigation to identify perioperative strategies for mitigating this risk is required to improve the safety of pancreatic resection.

Remnant closure after distal pancreatectomy: current state and future perspectives

Remnant closure after distal pancreatectomy remains a surgical challenge and is still associated with a fistula rate of about 30%. Despite numerous technical modifications including the use of stapling devices, artificial patches and glue components, no important progress has been made concerning this topic within the last decade. Although tissue texture, co-morbidities and the type of resection may influence fistula rate, substantial improvement can probably be reached by further technical modifications. In addition to the avoidance of fistula development, the recognition and management of this complication is essential to achieve good postoperative outcome. The present review summarizes the currently available data on technical approaches, incidence and risk factors for failure of remnant closure, fistula-associated complications and management as well as the future perspectives in this field of surgery.

Postoperative pancreatic fistula

Postoperative pancreatic fistula is an important complication after pancreatic resection. The frequency of its incidence varies between 3% after pancreatic head resections and up to 30% following distal pancreatectomy. In recent years, the international definition of pancreatic fistula has been standardised according to the approach of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF). Consequently, results from different studies have become comparable and the historically reported fistula rates can be evaluated more critically. The present review summarises the currently available data on incidence, risk factors, fistula-associated complications and management of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

An ongoing dispute in the management of severe pancreatic fistula: Pancreatospleenectomy or not?

The aim of this manuscript is to review controversies in managing severe pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. Significant progress in surgical technique and perioperative care has reduced the mortality rate of pancreatic surgery. However, leakage of the pancreatic stump still accounts for the majority of surgical complications after pancreatic resection. Various strategies have been employed in order to manage pancreatic fistula. Nonetheless high grade pancreatic fistula evokes controversy in relation to the choice of treatment. A Medline search was performed, with regard to conservative treatment options versus completion pancreatectomy for the management of pancreatic fistula grade C. Pancreatic fistula rates remain unchanged with an incidence ranging from 5%-20% and this is considered as the most important cause of postoperative death. Many authors claim that completion pancreatectomy has probably lost its role in favour of interventional radiology procedures, while others believe that completion pancreatectomy continues to have a place in the management of patients with severe clinical deterioration after pancreatic fistula who do not respond to non-surgical interventions. There is no agreement on the best clinical management of severe pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. Completion pancreatectomy is reserved for patients not improving with conventional measures.

Braun enteroenterostomy is associated with reduced delayed gastric emptying and early resumption of oral feeding following pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Morbidity rates following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remain high with delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and slow resumption of oral diet contributing to increased postoperative length of stay. A Braun enteroenterostomy has been shown to decrease bile reflux following gastric resection. We hypothesize that addition of Braun enteroenterostomy during PD would reduce the sequelae of DGE.

METHODS

From our PD database, patients were identified that underwent classic PD with partial gastrectomy from 2001 to 2006. All patients with reconstruction utilizing a single loop of jejunum at the University of Florida Shands Hospital were reviewed. Demographics, presenting signs and symptoms, pathologic diagnoses, and postoperative morbidity were compared in those patients undergoing reconstruction with an additional Braun enteroenterostomy (n = 70) to those not undergoing a Braun enteroenterostomy (n = 35).

RESULTS

Patients undergoing a Braun had NG tubes removed earlier (Braun: 2 days, no Braun: 3 days, P = 0.002) and no significant change in postoperative vomiting (Braun: 27%, no Braun: 37%, P = 0.37) or NG tube reinsertion rates (Braun: 17%, no Braun: 29%, P = 0.21). Median postoperative day with tolerance of oral liquids (Braun: 5, no Braun: 6, P = 0.01) and solid diets (Braun: 7, no Braun: 9, P = 0.01) were significantly sooner in the Braun group. DGE defined by two criteria including the inability to have oral intake by postoperative day 10 (Braun: 10%, no Braun: 26%, P < 0.05) and the international grading criteria (grades B and C, Braun: 7% vs. no Braun: 31%, P = 0.003) were significantly reduced in those undergoing the Braun procedure. In addition, the median length of stay (Braun: 10 days, no Braun: 12 days, P < 0.05) was significantly reduced in those undergoing the Braun procedure. The rate of pancreatic anastomotic failure was similar in the two groups (Braun: 17% vs. no Braun: 14%, P = 0.79). Median bile reflux was 0% in those undergoing a Braun.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that Braun enteroenterostomy can be safely performed in patients undergoing PD and may reduce the indicence of DGE and its sequelae. Further studies of Braun enteroenterostomy in larger randomized trials of patients undergoing PD are warranted.

Persisting elevation of C-reactive protein after pancreatic resections can indicate developing inflammatory complications

BACKGROUND

Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) is an established discriminating factor for necrotizing pancreatitis. In this study, the CRP response with respect to inflammatory postoperative complications was examined in a large, homogeneous series of pancreatic resections in order to define a relevant clinical parameter for early detection of inflammatory postoperative complications.

METHODS

688 consecutive pancreatic resections with jejunal anastomosis were screened for inflammatory postoperative complications based on a prospective database. Ninety-one patients had at least one inflammatory postoperative complication and were compared to a subgroup of 60 consecutive patients with uneventful postoperative courses.

RESULTS

In the postoperative setting after pancreatic resection, CRP peaked on postoperative day (POD) 3 with a median serum CRP of 132 mg/L, and gradually decreased thereafter in patients with an uncomplicated postoperative course. In complicated cases (with the exception of cholangitis), increase in CRP was significantly greater, peaked on POD 3 (median CRP 173 mg/L), and persisted thereafter, whereas white blood cell count and body temperature did not differ significantly from uneventful courses until POD 6. The median day of diagnosis of inflammatory postoperative complications was POD 9. A cutoff CRP value of 140 mg/dL on POD 4 yielded a positive predictive value of 89.1% (adjusted to the prevalence of inflammatory postoperative complications: 48.7%) with a specificity of 87.1% and a sensitivity of 69.5% for inflammatory postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Persistence of CRP elevation above 140 mg/dL on POD 4 is predictive of inflammatory postoperative complications and should prompt an intense clinical search for major septic processes (e.g. pancreatic fistula or abscess) if pneumonia and wound infection are unlikely or excluded.

Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1,507 patients: a report from the Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak Study Group

Several definitions for pancreatic leakage after pancreaticodoudenectomy exist, and the reported range of 2-50% underscores this variation. The goal was to determine if drain data alone was predictive of a leak and validate International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) leak criteria. Participating surgeons entered de-identified data into a web-based database designed to collect Whipple-related data. Definitions used were the ISGPF definition, > or = 3 days, amylase 3x normal; and Sarr's definition, > or = 5 days, amylase 5x normal, > 30 ml. We compared how well these two definitions were at detecting a leak and its complications. There were 1,507 cases submitted from 16 international institutions. A pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) was performed in 76.2%. Drain placement occurred in 98.0%. Using the ISGPF definition, the pancreatic leak rate was 26.7 and 14.3% with the Sarr definition. There were more grades A and B leaks detected by the ISGPF definition. Both determined grade C leaks equally. Both definitions correlated with an increased length of stay (LOS), need for percutaneous drains, reoperation, and delayed gastric emptying (DGE). Neither was associated with an increased risk of intensive care unit (ICU) stay or 30-day mortality. The ISGPF was able to capture more patients with clinically relevant leaks than Sarr's criteria; however, the ability to detect a leak by drain data alone is imperfect.

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition

BACKGROUND

Postoperative hemorrhage is one of the most severe complications after pancreatic surgery. Due to the lack of an internationally accepted, universal definition of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), the incidences reported in the literature vary considerably, even in reports from randomized controlled trials. Because of these variations in the definition of what constitutes a PPH, the incidences of its occurrence are not comparable.

METHODS

The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) developed an objective, generally applicable definition of PPH based on a literature review and consensus clinical experience.

RESULTS

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage is defined by 3 parameters: onset, location, and severity. The onset is either early (< or =24 hours after the end of the index operation) or late (>24 hours). The location is either intraluminal or extraluminal. The severity of bleeding may be either mild or severe. Three different grades of PPH (grades A, B, and C) are defined according to the time of onset, site of bleeding, severity, and clinical impact.

CONCLUSIONS

An objective, universally accepted definition and clinical grading of PPH is important for the appropriate management and use of interventions in PPH. Such a definition also would allow comparisons of results from future clinical trials. Such standardized definitions are necessary to compare, in a nonpartisan manner, the outcomes of studies and the evaluation of novel operative treatment modalities in pancreatic surgery.

Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Pancreaticoduodenectomy remains the most formidable operative procedure for the surgical treatment of gastrointestinal malignancy. Improved outcomes after the Whipple procedure have been attributed to better preoperative patient selection, advances in three-dimensional radiographic imaging, and regionalization of referrals to high-volume, tertiary care centers. Despite these advances, morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy are not insignificant and the overall prognosis following resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas remains poor. Improvements in endoscopic decompression of malignant biliary obstruction have decreased the need for palliative bypass operations and have focused current surgical issues on ways to improve clinical outcomes following potentially curative resections. Controversies such as whether or not to perform extended lymph node dissections, and standard versus pylorus-preserving resections have been addressed by randomized, prospective clinical trials. Major venous resections secondary to local tumor extension are now performed without an increase in morbidity or mortality and with survival rates comparable to standard resections. This has led to even more aggressive resections following neoadjuvant therapy for lesions previously considered unresectable and now perhaps better categorized as borderline resectable. The impact of surgical specialization and regionalization of referrals to tertiary care centers is evident in markedly improved perioperative mortality rates. This article will attempt to describe current guidelines for the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management of patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature

OBJECTIVE

To identify 10 critical elements of accurate and comprehensive reports of surgical complications.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Despite a venerable tradition of weekly morbidity and mortality conferences, inconsistent complication reporting is common in the surgical literature.

METHODS

An analysis of articles reporting short-term outcomes after pancreatectomy, esophagectomy, and hepatectomy was performed. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published from 1975 to 2001 and retrospective series of more than 100 patients published from 1990 to 2001 were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 119 articles reporting outcomes in 22,530 patients were analyzed. This included 42 RCTs and 77 retrospective series. Of the 10 criteria developed, no articles met all criteria; 2% met 9 criteria, 38% 7 or 8, 34% 5 or 6, 40% 3 or 4, and 12% 1 or 2. Outpatient information (22% of articles), definitions of complications provided (34% of articles), severity grade used (20% of articles), and risk factors included in analysis (29% of articles) were the most commonly unmet quality reporting criteria. Type of study (RCT vs. retrospective), site of institution (U.S. vs. non-U.S.) and journal (U.S. vs. non-U.S.) did not influence the quality of complication reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term surgical outcomes are routinely included in the data reported in the surgical literature. This is often used to show improvements over time or to assess the impact of therapeutic changes on patient outcome. The inconsistency of reporting and the lack of accepted principles of accrual, display, and analysis of complication data argue strongly for the creation and generalized use of standards for reporting this information.