Diagnostic value of tumor markers for differentiating malignant and benign pleural effusions of Iranian patients

Diagnostic Utility of Combined CEA, CA15-3 and CA125 Biomarkers and Cytomorphology in Suspicious and Malignant Serosal Fluid

Background & Objective:

Early detection of malignancies in the serous fluids has been remained an issue. A classic diagnostic tool for the ascites and pleural effusions is cytologic study (morphology) with approximately 98% specificity for the detection of cancer cells. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of three complementary markers in the serosal fluids of patients with malignant cytology and suspected cases.

Methods:

Seventy two patients with serosal effusion treated in three teaching hospitals were studied. The cases underwent a diagnostic workup to determine the pleural effusion malignancy and etiologies. Complementary markers, including CEA, CA15-3, and CA125 were measured in serosal fluids of three categories of benign, suspicious, and malignant. The study was carried out by Chemiluminescence immunoalayzer. The morphologies were re-evaluated by a consulting Cytopathologist.

Results:

Of 72 serosal fluid specimens, 41 (56.9%) were related to pleural effusion and 31 (43.1%) were related to ascites. The sensitivity of CEA, CA125, and CA15-3 biomarkers were 64, 84, and 68%, respectively, and the specificity of each test was 100, 86, and 96%, respectively. This was statistically achieved for the combination of the area of markers below the curve (AUC), 0.93 and 90% sensitivity and 91% specificity.

Conclusion:

The results suggest that complementary CA125, CA15-3, and CEA markers assayed with well-developed immunoassay method might be useful in the differentiation between malignant and benign effusions while combined with conventional cytology. CA125 yielded a significant correlation between cytomorphology and biomarkers based on the correlation coefficient analysis.

Diagnostic value of tumour markers in pleural effusions

Introduction

We investigated whether tumour markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) in pleural effusions and serum can be used to distinguish pleural effusion aetiology.

Materials and methods

During the first thoracentesis, we measured pleural fluid and serum tumour marker concentrations and calculated the pleural fluid/serum ratio for patients diagnosed with pleural effusion, using electrochemiluminescence immunoassays. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out and the Hanley and McNeil method was used to test the significance of the difference between the areas under ROC curves (AUCs). In order to detect which tumour marker best discriminates between malignant and non-malignant pleural effusions and to establish the predictive value of those markers, discriminant function analysis (DFA) and logistic regression analysis were utilized.

Results

Serum tumour markers CYFRA 21-1 and NSE as well as pleural NSE were good predictors of pleural effusion malignancy and their combined model was found statistically significant (Chi-square = 28.415, P < 0.001). Respective ROC analysis showed significant discrimination value of the combination of these three markers (AUC = 0.79).

Conclusions

Serum markers showed superiority to pleural fluid markers in determining pleural fluid aetiology. Serum CYFRA 21-1 and NSE concentrations as well as pleural fluid NSE values had the highest clinical value in differentiating between malignant and non-malignant pleural effusions. The combination of these three markers produced a significant model to resolve pleural effusion aetiology.

Management of occult malignant pleural disease firstly detected at thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

The current study was to investigate the risk factors of occult malignant pleural disease (MPD) detected at thoracotomy and the outcomes of surgical intervention for these non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with or without MPD.

Methods

We reviewed 2,093 consecutive NSCLC patients who underwent thoracotomy from January 2006 to January 2015. We used univariate and multivariate statistics to analyze the associations between clinicopathological variables and occurrence of occult MPD. Survival probability was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

5.26% (110/2,093) MPD was observed for these NSCLC patients with 28% of 5-year estimated survival rate. Age ≤50 (P=0.055), high CEA level (P=0.006), advanced N stage (P=0.005), adenocarcinoma (P=0.001) and pleural invasion (P=0.041) were detected to be independent risk factors for the occult MPD. Combination of these five factors, 0.756 of area under curve (AUC) was shown by the integrated prediction model test. Based on the optimal cut-off value (risk score =2.795), low-risk patients have better prognosis than the high-risk patients (median survival time 61.4 months vs. not reached, P<0.001; 5-year survival 71.8% vs. 51.1%, P<0.001). Significantly, 49.0 months/31.7% and 29.4 months/19.5% of the median survival time/5-year survival rate were found for the occult MPD 110 patients receiving primary lesion resection and open-close surgery, respectively (P=0.037).

Conclusions

We summarized that a new prediction model including 5-risk factors of age, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), N stage, adenocarcinoma and pleural invasion was provided to diagnose MPD for the NSCLC patients and primary lesion resection greatly contributed for these MPD patients.

Is neuron-specific enolase useful for diagnosing malignant pleural effusions? evidence from a validation study and meta-analysis

Background

Neuron-Specific enolase (NSE) has been used as a typical tumor marker and shows a potential to diagnose malignant pleural effusion (MPE). The ability of NSE in diagnosing MPE has been investigated in many studies, but with inconsistent conclusions. This study sought to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of NSE for MPE through a clinical study and together with a meta-analysis.

Methods

Pleural effusion samples from 136 patients with MPE and 102 patients with benign pleural effusion (BPE) were collected, and NSE levels were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the ability of NSE to differentiate MPE from BPE. Literature search was conducted to identify suitable publications, data were extracted and diagnostic indexes including sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratio (PLR/NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled. Summary ROC curve was generated to determine the overall diagnostic accuracy of NSE for MPE.

Results

Levels of NSE were significantly increased in pleural effusion from patients with MPE than that from BPE (18.53 ± 27.30 vs. 6.41 ± 6.95 ng/ml, p < 0.001). With a cut-off value of 8.92 ng/ml, pleural NSE had a sensitivity of 59.56% and a specificity of 83.33% in diagnosing MPE. A total of 14 studies with 1896 subjects were included for meta-analysis. The diagnostic parameters of NSE were listed as follows: sensitivity, 0.53 (95% CI: 0.38–0.67); specificity, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75–0.91); PLR, 3.54 (95% CI: 2.33–5.39); NLR, 0.56 (95% CI: 0.42–0.73); and DOR, 6.39 (95% CI: 3.72–10.96). The area under the summary ROC curve was 0.78.

Conclusions

The role of pleural NSE measurement in diagnosing MPE is limited and with a low sensitivity. The clinical utility of NSE assay should be combined with the results of other tumor markers examination and the detail clinical information of patient. Further studies are needed to confirm the role of NSE in diagnosing MPE.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3572-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Diagnostic Value of Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) and Cancer Antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) in the Diagnosis of Pleural Effusions

Introduction: Pleural effusion diagnosis plays an important role in determining treatment strategies. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic capacity of tumor markers CA 15-3 and NSE solely or in combination in differentiating the nature of pleural fluid. Methods and Materials: In this cross-sectional study we evaluated 93 patients with pleural effusions (44 malignant and 49 benign). NSE and CA 15-3 serum and pleural levels were measured simultaneously using immunoenzyme assay kits. Diagnosis was established on the basis of cytological study. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of CA 15-3 serum and pleural level measurement were 70.4%, 49.0%, and 79.5% and 49.0%, respectively. Serum NSE levels had 75.0% sensitivity and 69.4% specificity while the respective pleural figures were 75.0% and 73.5%. The combination of NSE and CA 15-3 serum and pleural levels had the highest sensitivity (93.2%), although combined serum levels had the lowest sensitivity (47.7%). With an accuracy of 74.2%, pleural levels of NSE had the highest diagnostic potential. Conclusion: Measuring NSE and CA 15-3 tumor markers is a suitable approach to distinguish the nature of pleural effusions, with NSE pleural levels demonstrating the highest diagnostic accuracy.

Evaluation of predictive value of pleural CEA in patients with pleural effusions and histological findings: A prospective study and literature review

OBJECTIVES

Pleural effusion recognizes heterogeneous etiology and pathogenesis and requires invasive diagnostic procedures. Usually, after pleural fluid analysis, 30-50% of patients with malignant pleural effusion exhibit negative pleural cytology, and the sensitivity of image-guided pleural needle-aspiration biopsy ranges between 60% and 70%. With the aim of differentiating between benign (BPE) and malignant (MPE) pleural effusions, several tumor markers have been assayed in the pleural fluid and the majority of studies focus on pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (p-CEA). The aims of this study were to evaluate (i) the diagnostic accuracy of p-CEA of patients with pleural effusions undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for diagnostic purpose, (ii) the relationship between p-CEA and serum CEA (s-CEA), and (iii) the usefulness of the p-CEA/s-CEA ratio in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions (MPE).

DESIGN & METHODS

We prospectively enrolled in the study 134 consecutive patients with pleural effusions, scheduled for having VATS and biopsy. The final diagnosis, based on histopathology of the VATS-guided specimens, was available for all patients. p-CEA and s-CEA was assayed with a chemiluminescence immunoassay method (CLIA), applied on the Maglumi 2000 Plus automated platform (SNIBE, Shenzen, China).

RESULTS

The sensitivity and accuracy of p-CEA was significantly higher than that of pleural cytology at the same specificity comparing BPE with MPE and BPE with non-small lung cancer. The sensitivity of p-CEA and PC together reached 100% (BPE vs. NSCLC) and 91.5% (BPE vs. MPE excluding mesothelioma), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The p-CEA measurement in patients with pleural effusion of uncertain etiology is a safe and cost-effective procedure, everywhere easily available, which may help clinicians in selecting patients for further evaluations. An elevated p-CEA level in a patient with pleural effusion and negative pleural cytology suggests the need of more invasive procedure (e.g. VATS-guided biopsies), whilst low p-CEA may support a follow-up.

Clinical diagnostic utility of CA 15-3 for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion: A meta-analysis

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is one of the most common pleura-associated conditions observed in clinical practice. The development of MPE usually defines advanced cancer with a poor prognosis. Carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), as an effective pleural fluid biomarker, has been an object of ongoing research in the detection of MPE. The aim of this meta-analysis was to establish the overall diagnostic accuracy of the measurement of pleural CA 15-3 for diagnosing MPE. The databases Medline (using PubMed as the search engine), Embase, Ovid, Web of Science and Cochrane database (up to December 2013) were searched to identify relevant studies. No lower date limit was applied. All literature published in English was reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled using a random-effect model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the overall diagnostic value. The methodological quality was assessed in line with the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy statement. Twenty-one studies with a total of 2,861 cases were included in present meta-analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and DOR of CA 15-3 in the diagnosis of MPE were 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56–0.61], 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90–0.93), 8.93 (95% CI, 4.45–17.93), 0.46 (95% CI, 0.37–0.56) and 24.89 (95% CI, 10.39–59.63), respectively. In addition, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.84. In conclusion, due to the significantly high specificity of pleural CA 15-3 in detecting MPE, it may play a pivotal role in screening to identify patients who may benefit from further invasive pathologic examination, particularly in those presenting clinical manifestations of MPE but with negative cytological findings of the pleural fluid. However, ruling out MPE by testing CA15-3 alone is not recommended due to its limited sensitivity, and it is recommended that the results of CA15-3 assays are interpreted in parallel with conventional test results and other clinical findings.

The utility of tumor markers CA 125, CA 15-3, and CA 19-9 in assessing the response to therapy in pulmonary and pleural tuberculosis

AIM

Both of the diagnosis and treatment evaluation are time-consuming conditions in patients with pulmonary and pleural tuberculosis. The aim of this study was to establish the validity of tumor markers CA 125, CA 15-3, and CA 19-9 in the diagnosis of pulmonary and pleural TB and to verify the success of the treatment protocol.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The levels of tumor markers CA 125, CA 15-3, and CA 19-9 were measured before and after treatment in 67 TB patients, 54 of whom had pulmonary TB and 13 of whom had pleural TB. All values were compared with the results of a healthy control group of 44 subjects.

RESULTS

CA 125 and CA 15-3 levels were significantly high when compared with those of the healthy control group and there was a significant decrease in both tumor marker levels after treatment in patients with pulmonary TB (P < 0.001 and P < 0.004, respectively). However, the difference found in CA 19-9 levels before and after treatment in patients with pulmonary TB was not statistically significant (P < 0.08). When the CA 125, CA 15-3, and CA 19-9 values of the pulmonary TB group before treatment were compared with that of the healthy control group, the results were statistically significant in all parameters except CA 19-9 (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.09 for CA 125, CA 15-3, and CA 19-9, respectively). In the patients with pleural TB, CA 125, CA 15-3, and CA 19-9 values did not change significantly after treatment.

CONCLUSION

The authors suggest that CA 125 and CA 15-3 tumor markers may be important for verification of the success of treatment protocol in pulmonary TB, as the differences found for these tumor markers between the pre- and the posttreatment periods are statistically significant.

Lectin microarrays differentiate carcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in pleural effusions

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of lectin microarrays in pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer. A lectin microarray, LTL, PSA, LCA, UEA-1, AAL, MAL-I, MAL-II, SNA, WGA, ECL, DSA, STL, SWGA, HPA, ConA, GNA, HHL, BPL, EEL, Jacalin, WFA, ACL, MPL, DBA, SBA, was used to determine the glycoprotein profile of cells in pleural effusions from patients with lung cancer (54 cases), and with benign lung disease (54 cases). The A549 cell line, used as an experimental control, was positive for AAL, MAL-I, WGA, STL, Jacalin and ACL binding. Adenocarcinoma cells in pleural effusions were positive for ECL, DSA, AAL, MAL-I, WGA, STL, Jacalin, and ACL binding. AAL, WGA, and ACL positive binding was the most common, found in 54, 48, and 38 samples, respectively. ECL and DSA binding was positive in only 4 samples. In comparison, reactive mesothelial cells displayed positive binding for all markers in the microarray panel. SNA and AAL positive binding was detected in the majority of samples; 50/54 and 48/54 samples, respectively. Positive binding of DBA, MAL-II and EEL was present in only 2, 4 and 4 samples, respectively. SNA binding had the highest sensitivity (92.6 %), specificity (100 %), and accuracy (96.3 %). SNA may be used as a biomarker to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from adenocarcinoma cells. The lectin microarrays proved able to distinguish carcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in pleural effusions.

hTERT gene amplification and clinical significance in pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene amplification was detected in pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer (n = 69) and in patients with benign lung disease (n = 46) when using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) technique.

RESULTS

hTERT gene relative copy numbers were significantly higher in effusions from patients with malignant, adenocarcinoma and small-cell lung cancer than in effusions from patients with benign lung disease (P < .01). By using a threshold value of 1.39, hTERT gene amplification was significantly more frequent in malignant effusions compared with benign effusions and more likely to be positive for malignant effusions, compared with cytology (P < .01). The diagnostic performance of qPCR of hTERT gene amplification was significantly higher than that of cytology, in terms of sensitivity (91.3% vs. 56.5%), negative predictive value (87.8% vs. 60.5%), and accuracy (92.2% vs. 73.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Detecting hTERT gene amplification by qPCR appears suitable for distinguishing carcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in pleural effusions. hTERT gene amplification was more sensitive than cytology and may be useful for diagnosing pleural micrometastases.

Transcription expression and clinical significance of dishevelled-3 mRNA and δ-catenin mRNA in pleural effusions from patients with lung cancer

Objective. To evaluate diagnostic utility of Dishevelled-3 (DVL-3) mRNA and δ-catenin mRNA expression in pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer. Methods. DVL-3 mRNA and δ-catenin mRNA levels were assessed by performing RT-PCR on pleural effusion specimens from patients with lung cancer (n = 75) and with lung benign disease (n = 51). Results. The expressions of DVL-3 mRNA and δ-catenin mRNA were significantly higher in malignant than in benign lung disease (P < 0.01) and were obviously higher than cytology in adenocarcinoma (P < 0.01). In single use, DVL-3 mRNA had the highest specificity (94.1%) and PPV (95.7%), whereas δ-catenin mRNA had the highest sensitivity (92.0%) and NPV (88.5%). When combinations of markers were evaluated together, DVL-3 mRNA and δ-catenin mRNA gave a high-diagnostic performance: sensitivity of 100.0%, NPV of 100.0%, and accuracy of 96.0%, respectively. Conclusion. As molecular markers of detecting pleural micrometastasis, DVL-3 mRNA and δ-catenin mRNA are helpful to diagnose the cancer cells in pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer.

Transcription expression and clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA and endostatin mRNA in pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the individual and combined diagnostic utility of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mRNA and endostatin mRNA in pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer. Transcription levels of VEGF and endostatin were detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer (92 cases) and with lung benign disease (36 cases). Both VEGF mRNA and endostatin mRNA was significantly higher in malignant, AC, and SCC effusions than in benign effusions (P < 0.01). In the subgrouping, VEGF mRNA was obviously higher than endostatin mRNA in malignant and AC effusions (P < 0.01), whereas VEGF mRNA and endostatin mRNA did not differ between AC group and SCC group (P > 0.05). In single, VEGF mRNA had the highest sensitivity (82.6%) and accuracy (84.3%), whereas endostatin mRNA had the highest specificity (100%). When combinations of VEGF mRNA and endostatin mRNA were evaluated together, they gave a high-diagnostic performance: sensitivity of 95.7% and accuracy of 93.8%, respectively. The detection of VEGF mRNA and endostatin mRNA appears to be suitable for distinguishing carcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in pleural effusions, they could be useful to diagnose the pleural micrometastasis.

[Diagnotic value of the combined determination of telomerase activity in induced sputum, pleural effusion and fiberobronchoscopic biopsy samples in lung cancer]

背景与目的

已有的研究表明, 端粒酶的异常活化与肺癌的发生、发展及转归密切相关, 端粒酶是目前已知广谱的肿瘤分子标记物, 是诊断和治疗肺癌的重要分子标志物之一。本研究旨在探讨诱导痰、胸水和纤维支气管镜活检组织中端粒酶活性的联合检测对肺癌的诊断价值。

方法

对80例肺癌伴胸水患者和50例肺部良性病变伴胸水患者, 应用TRAP-PCR-ELISA方法分别检测其诱导痰、胸水和纤维支气管镜活检组织中端粒酶的活性。

结果

肺癌伴胸水患者诱导痰、胸水和纤维支气管镜活组织中端粒酶的活性均明显高于肺部良性病变伴胸水患者(P < 0.001), 不同病理类型的肺癌患者间三种标本的端粒酶活性差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。诱导痰、胸水和纤维支气管镜活组织中端粒酶活性的检测对肺癌的诊断敏感性分别为62.5%(50/80)、46.3%(37/80)和60.0%(48/80);特异性分别为72.0%(36/50)、66.0%(33/50)和70.0%(35/50);准确性分别为66.2%(86/130)、53.8%(70/130)和63.8%(83/130);三项联合检测的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为85.0%(68/80)、78.0%(39/50)和82.3%(107/130), 其中敏感性与单独诱导痰、胸水和纤维支气管镜活组织的敏感性差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。

结论

诱导痰、胸水和纤维支气管镜活组织端粒酶活性的联合检测具有更高的敏感性, 可以提高肺癌的诊断率。

Diagnostic value of carbohydrate antigens in supernatants and sediments of pleural effusions

A panel of tumour markers including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (Ca)15-3, Ca125 and Ca19-9 were measured in the lysate of sediments and in the supernatants of pleural effusions of patients with benign and malignant disease. The tumour markers were also measured in the serum of the same patients. Of these patients, 32 had benign diseases (12 trasudative effusions associated with cirrhosis and 20 with non-malignant exudates: 12 pleuritis and 8 other inflammations) and 103 had malignant effusions (37 breast cancers, 29 lung cancers, 10 ovary cancers, 6 kidney cancers, 11 mesotheliomas and 10 lymphomas). We showed the highest level of CEA in pleural effusions of lung cancer followed by that in pleural effusions of breast cancer; whereas Ca15-3 was very high in the pleural effusions of breast and lung cancer. Concerning the lysate of sediment, CEA was high in the pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer and Ca15-3 in those of patients with breast cancer. The other markers are much less useful. For the remaining tumours, none of the markers tested appear to aid in the diagnosis of disease. In conclusion, our data suggest that the combined determination of tumour markers on supernatants and sediments of pleural effusion may provide additional information on the nature of pleural effusion, especially for cases with negative cytology.

The use of non-routine pleural fluid analysis in the diagnosis of pleural effusion

The investigation of a pleural effusion is, in general, a very straight forward process with the combination of clinical history, examination, radiology and pleural fluid analysis leading to diagnosis in most cases. While most fluid samples are sent for routine analysis including protein, LDH, glucose, cytology and microbiology, there are a number of more unusual fluid analyses available which in some cases directly lead to, and in others are suggestive of the diagnosis. Moreover, other fluid markers are constantly being evaluated as a diagnostic tool. In this review, we describe these non-routine pleural fluid analyses in detail. English language publications in MEDLINE and references from relevant articles from January 1 1990 to August 1 2009 were reviewed. Keywords searched in combination were pleural fluid, effusion, analysis, transudate, exudate and diagnosis.

High levels of tumor markers in pleural fluid correlate with poor survival in patients with adenocarcinomatous or squamous malignant effusions

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine whether several pleural fluid (PF) tumor markers, either alone or in combination, could be used to predict survival time of patients with malignant pleural effusion secondary to adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 224 patients with confirmed metastatic pleural malignancies due to adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled. PF tumor markers were determined either by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (CEA, CA 15-3, CYFRA 21-1) or microparticle enzyme immunoassay (CA 125) technologies. Cutoff points that predicted death during the first month after diagnoses, with a specificity of 60%, were selected for each marker, using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

In patients with adenocarcinomatous or squamous malignant effusion, the combination of PF CA 125>or=1000 U/mL and CYFRA 21-1>or=100 ng/mL predicted a lower survival (4 vs. 11.7 months, p=0.03; and 0.3 vs. 8.4 months, p=0.003 respectively). This tumor marker combination remained as an independent predictor of poor outcome when adjusted for age and tumor type.

CONCLUSION

High PF tumor marker levels identify a subgroup of patients with a shorter median survival.

Immunocytochemical panel for distinguishing carcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in pleural effusions

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the individual and combined diagnostic utility of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragments (CK19) and HBME-1 in pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

CEA, CK19 and HBME-1 were detected by immunocytochemistry in pleural effusions from patients with lung cancer (86 cases) and without lung cancer (40 cases).

RESULTS

CEA and CK19 expression were significantly higher in the carcinoma cell group and in three subgrouped as adenocarcinoma (AC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and small cell lung cancer than in the mesothelial cell group, whereas HBME-1 expression was lower in the former group (P < 0.01). In the subgrouped tumours, CEA expression was higher in AC than in SCC (P < 0.05), whereas HBME-1 expression was higher in SCC than in AC (P < 0.01). Used alone, CK19 had the highest sensitivity (95.3%) and accuracy (93.7%), whereas CEA had the highest specificity (97.5%). When combinations of antibodies were evaluated together and membrane staining with HBME-1 taken as a negative outcome, CK19 and HBME-1 gave a high diagnostic performance: sensitivity of 100.0% and accuracy of 95.2% respectively.

CONCLUSION

A panel of CEA, CK19 and HBME-1 monoclonal antibodies proved to be suitable for distinguishing carcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in pleural effusions.

Diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen in malignant pleural effusion: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Conventional tests are not always helpful in making a diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Many studies have investigated the utility of pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the early diagnosis of MPE. The present meta-analysis determined the accuracy of CEA measurement in the diagnosis of MPE.

METHODS

A systematic review of English language studies was conducted and data on the accuracy of pleural CEA concentrations in the diagnosis of MPE were pooled using random effects models. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize the overall test performance.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The summary estimates for CEA in the diagnosis of MPE were: sensitivity 0.54 (95% CI: 0.52-0.55), specificity 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.95), positive likelihood ratio 9.52 (95% CI: 6.97-13.01), negative likelihood ratio 0.49 (95% CI: 0.44-0.54) and diagnostic odds ratio 22.5 (95% CI: 15.6-32.5). Analysis of a subset of 11 studies which examined the value of pleural CEA in ruling out a diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma found that the sensitivity and specificity of a CEA level exceeding cut-off values were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99) and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.55-0.65), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of pleural CEA is likely to be a useful diagnostic tool for confirming MPE, and is also helpful in the differential diagnosis between malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic lung cancer. The results of CEA assays should be interpreted in parallel with clinical findings and the results of conventional tests.