EP1572: a novel peptido-mimetic GH secretagogue with potent and selective GH-releasing activity in man

Pilot clinical trial of macimorelin to assess safety and efficacy in patients with cancer cachexia

BACKGROUND

Cancer cachexia is associated with reduced body weight, appetite and quality of life (QOL) with no approved treatments. Growth hormone secretagogues like macimorelin have potential to mitigate these effects.

METHODS

This pilot study assessed the safety and efficacy of macimorelin for 1 week. Efficacy was defined a priori as 1-week change in body weight (≥0.8 kg), plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 (≥50 ng/mL) or QOL (≥15%). Secondary outcomes included food intake, appetite, functional performance, energy expenditure and safety laboratory parameters. Patients with cancer cachexia were randomized to 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg macimorelin or placebo; outcomes were assessed non-parametrically.

RESULTS

Participants receiving at least one of either macimorelin dose were combined (N = 10; 100% male; median age = 65.50 ± 2.12) and compared with placebo (N = 5; 80% male; median age = 68.00 ± 6.19). Efficacy criteria achieved: body weight (macimorelin N = 2; placebo N = 0; P = 0.92); IGF-1 (macimorelin N = 0; placebo N = 0); QOL by Anderson Symptom Assessment Scale (macimorelin N = 4; placebo N = 1; P = 1.00) or Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F; macimorelin N = 3; placebo N = 0; P = 0.50). No related serious or non-serious adverse events were reported. In macimorelin recipients, change in FACIT-F was directly associated with change in body weight (r = 0.92, P = 0.001), IGF-1 (r = 0.80, P = 0.01), and caloric intake (r = 0.83, P = 0.005), and inversely associated with change in energy expenditure (r = -0.67, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Daily oral macimorelin for 1 week was safe and numerically improved body weight and QOL in patients with cancer cachexia compared with placebo. Longer term administration should be evaluated for mitigation of cancer-induced reductions in body weight, appetite and QOL in larger studies.

A decade of approved first-in-class small molecule orphan drugs: Achievements, challenges and perspectives

In the past decade (2011-2020), there was a growing interest in the discovery and development of orphan drugs for the treatment of rare diseases. However, rare diseases only account for a population of 0.65‰-1‰ which usually occur with previously unknown biological mechanisms and lack of specific therapeutics, thus to increase the demands for the first-in-class (FIC) drugs with new biological targets or mechanisms. Considering the achievements in the past 10 years, a total of 410 drugs were approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which contained 151 FIC drugs and 184 orphan drugs, contributing to make up significant numbers of the approvals. Notably, more than 50% of FIC drugs are developed as orphan drugs and some of them have already been milestones in drug development. In this review, we aim to discuss the FIC small molecules for the development of orphan drugs case by case and highlight the R&D strategy with novel targets and scientific breakthroughs.

An insight into the multifunctional role of ghrelin and structure activity relationship studies of ghrelin receptor ligands with clinical trials

Ghrelin is a multifunctional gastrointestinal acylated peptide, primarily synthesized in the stomach and regulates the secretion of growth hormone and energy homeostasis. It plays a central role in modulating the diverse biological, physiological and pathological functions in vertebrates. The synthesis of ghrelin receptor ligands after the finding of growth hormone secretagogue developed from Met-enkephalin led to reveal the endogenous ligand ghrelin and the receptors. Subsequently, many peptides, small molecules and peptidomimetics focusing on the ghrelin receptor, GHS-R1a, were derived. In this review, the key features of ghrelin's structure, forms, its bio-physiological functions, pathological roles and therapeutic potential have been highlighted. A few peptidomimetics and pseudo peptide synthetic perspectives have also been discussed to make ghrelin receptor ligands, clinical trials and their success.

Effects of oral macimorelin on copeptin and anterior pituitary hormones in healthy volunteers

PURPOSE

The test with the highest diagnostic accuracy for diabetes insipidus is copeptin measurement after hypertonic saline infusion. However, the procedure is cumbersome and unpleasant due to rapid sodium increase. An oral stimulation test would be highly desirable. Macimorelin, an oral ghrelin agonist, is a newly approved diagnostic test for growth hormone (GH) deficiency, but its effects on copeptin/vasopressin are unknown and the effects on other pituitary hormones only scarcely investigated.

METHODS

In this prospective, interventional, proof-of-concept study Copeptin and anterior pituitary hormones were measured in 28 healthy volunteers on two test days at baseline, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after a single dose of macimorelin (first visit: 0.5 mg/kg, second visit: 0.75 mg/kg).

RESULTS

Baseline copeptin levels were 5.26 pmol/L [1.57, 6.81] and did not change after macimorelin intake (0.5 mg/kg: maximal median change 0.40 [- 0.49, 0.65] pmol/L, p = 0.442; 0.75 mg/kg: - 0.13 [- 0.45, 0.17] pmol/L, p = 0.442. Median GH levels increased from 3.67 mU/L with a maximal median change of 94.66 [IQR 56.5; 110.96] mU/L, p < 0.001. No effect was seen on cortisol, ACTH, LH and FSH levels. Prolactin (max. median change 100 [2.5; 146.5] mU/L, p = 0.004) and free thyroxine (fT4) (0.5 [0.2; 0.8] pmol/L, p < 0.001) increased, whereas TSH decreased (- 0.18 [- 0.22, - 0.09] mU/L, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We confirm an increase of GH upon macimorelin in healthy volunteers. However, macimorelin did not stimulate copeptin and therefore does not provide an oral test alternative for the diagnosis of diabetes insipidus. Additionally, a stimulatory effect was seen for prolactin and fT4, but not for ACTH and gonadotropic hormones.

REGISTRATION

The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03844217) on February 18, 2019.

Thorough QT/QTc Study Evaluating the Effect of Macimorelin on Cardiac Safety Parameters in Healthy Participants

Macimorelin is an orally active growth hormone secretagogue indicated for the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of macimorelin on the baseline and placebo-corrected mean QT interval using Fridericia's formula (ΔΔQTcF). Secondary objectives were to determine QTcF for moxifloxacin; evaluate the effects of macimorelin on other cardiac intervals (PR, QRS, RR), heart rate, and electrocardiogram morphology parameters; characterize pharmacokinetics; and assess safety of macimorelin. The phase 1 thorough QT/QTc study, designed according to the International Council for Harmonisation E14 guideline, was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 3-way complete crossover study comparing the effect of macimorelin 2.0 mg/kg with placebo and moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control). Data were collected over a 3-month span from male (n=36) and female participants (n=24) aged 18 to 55 years with body mass index between 18.5 and 30.0 kg/m2 . Fifty-six participants received all 3 treatments. The ΔΔQTcF for macimorelin showed a prolongation with a maximum mean value of 9.61 milliseconds (2-sided 90% confidence interval, 7.81 milliseconds and 11.41 milliseconds) at 4 hours after dosing. The 2-sided 90% confidence interval of this value also exceeded the 10 millisecond threshold at 3 hours after dosing. Assay sensitivity was confirmed with moxifloxacin. Other electrocardiogram parameters evaluated were not influenced by macimorelin. Macimorelin did not raise other safety concerns and was well tolerated. In summary, a single supratherapeutic dose of macimorelin prolonged cardiac repolarization according to the regulatory guideline.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of macimorelin in healthy adults: Results of a single-dose, randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Macimorelin is an orally active ghrelin receptor agonist indicated for the diagnosis of adult growth hormone (GH) deficiency in the United States. This phase 1 study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single ascending doses of macimorelin (including a supratherapeutic dose to be used in a thorough QT trial) in healthy adults.

DESIGN

Participants were randomized to receive macimorelin 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg or placebo in 1 of 3 sequential ascending-dose cohorts. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assays were collected pre-dose and at specified time points over a 24-h period. Pharmacokinetic parameters assessed included area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum concentration (C_max) of macimorelin in plasma, time to C_max (t_max), and terminal elimination half-life (t_1/2). Pharmacodynamic assessments evaluated levels of GH, adrenocorticotropic hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, cortisol, and prolactin. Safety was assessed based on treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, 12‑lead electrocardiograms, and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 28 healthy adults were enrolled and completed the study. Macimorelin AUC and C_max showed less than dose-proportional increases following administration of 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg. Mean t_1/2 was 3.51 h for macimorelin 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg and 8.29 h for macimorelin 2.0 mg/kg; median t_max occurred at 0.5 to 0.75 h. GH levels increased after dosing, with a t_max of 0.75 h to 1.0 h. Mean GH C_max was similar with the macimorelin 0.5- and 1.0-mg/kg doses (31.9 and 37.8 ng/mL, respectively) and was ~50% lower with macimorelin 2.0 mg/kg (18.4 ng/mL). Transient increases were observed in adrenocorticotropic hormone, cortisol, and prolactin, which were not dose related. A total of 19 TEAEs were reported in 35.7% (10/28) of participants; all TEAEs were mild or moderate and resolved. A total of 12 drug-related TEAEs were reported in 8 participants. Headache was the most common drug-related TEAE. All doses of macimorelin prolonged mean QTcF by 10 to 11 ms. There were no clinically meaningful changes in vital signs or laboratory parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose administration of macimorelin 0.5 to 2.0 mg/kg was well tolerated. Macimorelin exposure was less than dose-proportional over the dose range studied. Administration of macimorelin stimulated GH production, with the greatest increases observed in the macimorelin 0.5- and 1.0-mg/kg groups.

From JMV-1843 to Macrilen

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a severe pathology that greatly affects the quality of life, and increases morbidity and mortality of patients owing to the augmentation of cardiovascular events. Treatment of GHD is challenging, mainly because there is no specific characteristic sign or symptom that can be used to make a clear diagnosis. There is need for an unequivocal diagnosis of GHD to avoid unnecessary treatment with GH, because the available provocative tests (GH stimulation tests) are not specific and sensitive enough, and are contraindicated in some patients. Ghrelin is an endogenous peptide that stimulates GH secretion by interacting with a G-protein-coupled receptor named ghrelin receptor (GH secretagogue receptor 1a, GHS-R1a). Given this, a GH stimulation test using ghrelin or its analogues appears to be attractive. In this paper, a modified tripeptide first named JMV-1843 in the laboratory is briefly presented. It is potent and selective in stimulating the release of GH and is orally active. It has been recently commercialised for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency under the tradename Macrilen. The test using this compound appears to be reliable, well tolerated, and simple.

Macimorelin as a Diagnostic Test for Adult GH Deficiency

PURPOSE

The diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (AGHD) is challenging and often requires confirmation with a GH stimulation test (GHST). The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is considered the reference standard GHST but is labor intensive, can cause severe hypoglycemia, and is contraindicated for certain patients. Macimorelin, an orally active GH secretagogue, could be used to diagnose AGHD by measuring stimulated GH levels after an oral dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover trial was designed to validate the efficacy and safety of single-dose oral macimorelin for AGHD diagnosis compared with the ITT. Subjects with high (n = 38), intermediate (n = 37), and low (n = 39) likelihood for AGHD and healthy, matched controls (n = 25) were included in the efficacy analysis.

RESULTS

After the first test, 99% of macimorelin tests and 82% of ITTs were evaluable. Using GH cutoff levels of 2.8 ng/mL for macimorelin and 5.1 ng/mL for ITTs, the negative agreement was 95.38% (95% CI, 87% to 99%), the positive agreement was 74.32% (95% CI, 63% to 84%), sensitivity was 87%, and specificity was 96%. On retesting, the reproducibility was 97% for macimorelin (n = 33). In post hoc analyses, a GH cutoff of 5.1 ng/mL for both tests resulted in 94% (95% CI, 85% to 98%) negative agreement, 82% (95% CI, 72% to 90%) positive agreement, 92% sensitivity, and 96% specificity. No serious adverse events were reported for macimorelin.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral macimorelin is a simple, well-tolerated, reproducible, and safe diagnostic test for AGHD with accuracy comparable to that of the ITT. A GH cutoff of 5.1 ng/mL for the macimorelin test provides an excellent balance between sensitivity and specificity.

2017 FDA Peptide Harvest

2017 was an excellent year in terms of new drugs (chemical entities and biologics) approved by the FDA, with a total of 46. In turn, one of the highlights was the number of peptides (six) included in this list. Here, the six peptides are analyzed in terms of chemical structure, synthetic strategy used for their production, source, therapeutic use, and mode of action.

From Belly to Brain: Targeting the Ghrelin Receptor in Appetite and Food Intake Regulation

Ghrelin is the only known peripherally-derived orexigenic hormone, increasing appetite and subsequent food intake. The ghrelinergic system has therefore received considerable attention as a therapeutic target to reduce appetite in obesity as well as to stimulate food intake in conditions of anorexia, malnutrition and cachexia. As the therapeutic potential of targeting this hormone becomes clearer, it is apparent that its pleiotropic actions span both the central nervous system and peripheral organs. Despite a wealth of research, a therapeutic compound specifically targeting the ghrelin system for appetite modulation remains elusive although some promising effects on metabolic function are emerging. This is due to many factors, ranging from the complexity of the ghrelin receptor (Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor, GHSR-1a) internalisation and heterodimerization, to biased ligand interactions and compensatory neuroendocrine outputs. Not least is the ubiquitous expression of the GHSR-1a, which makes it impossible to modulate centrally-mediated appetite regulation without encroaching on the various peripheral functions attributable to ghrelin. It is becoming clear that ghrelin’s central signalling is critical for its effects on appetite, body weight regulation and incentive salience of food. Improving the ability of ghrelin ligands to penetrate the blood brain barrier would enhance central delivery to GHSR-1a expressing brain regions, particularly within the mesolimbic reward circuitry.

New ligands of the ghrelin receptor based on the 1,2,4-triazole scaffold by introduction of a second chiral center

Introducing a second chiral center on our previously described 1,2,4-triazole, allowed us to increase diversity and elongate the 'C-terminal part' of the molecule. Therefore, we were able to explore mimics of the substance P analogs described as inverse agonists. Some compounds presented affinities in the nanomolar range and potent biological activities, while one exhibited a partial inverse agonist behavior similar to a Substance P analog.

Ischemic-hypoxic mechanisms leading to hippocampal dysfunction as a consequence of status epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the recognized primary precipitating events that can lead to temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) associated with hippocampal sclerosis. This type of epilepsy is characterized by poor response to drug treatment, often requiring surgical intervention to remove the mesial temporal regions involved in the seizure onset. However, even neurosurgery may not be completely successful. Thus, the prevention of hippocampal damage and epileptogenesis is currently evaluated as a possible alternative therapeutic approach to prevent the development of pharmacoresistant TLE. Lines of evidence suggest that ischemic-hypoxic lesions might occur in different brain regions, including the hippocampus, during SE. Especially in the hippocampal CA3 region, an ischemic-like lesion develops in the stratum lacunosum-moleculare and is mainly characterized by a loss of astrocytes and neuronal processes and increased immunostaining of pimonidazole which probes areas exposed to hypoxia. Interestingly, these mechanisms can contribute to neuronal cell loss and may be counteracted by drugs that can afford vascular protection, as in the case of ligands of the ghrelin receptor. Notably, some of the ghrelin receptor ligands possess a double edge effect, since they are anticonvulsant and vascular-protective, thus, potentially representing new tools to counteract the consequences of SE. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Status Epilepticus".

Clinical development of ghrelin axis-derived molecules for cancer cachexia treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cachexia is a devastating complication of cancer for which there is no approved treatment. Here we review the clinical development of ghrelin and ghrelin mimetics (also known as growth hormone secretagogues or GHS) for cancer cachexia treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ghrelin, a novel hormone known to increase appetite, lean and fat mass, and growth hormone secretion, is being developed as a therapeutic option for cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS). Recent animal studies suggest that it may also decrease inflammation and that some of its effects may be independent of its only known receptor, the GHS receptor-1a.Clinical studies recently have shown that administration of ghrelin or GHS improves appetite and quality of life as assessed by questionnaires. Weight gain, increased food intake and better tolerance to chemotherapy have also been reported. This treatment appears to be safe and well tolerated.

SUMMARY

Ghrelin and GHS have the potential to effectively prevent or reverse CACS. Preliminary studies show improvements in weight stabilization and appetite with short-term usage. Further studies are required to fully characterize the role of ghrelin and GHS for the treatment of CACS and to establish the safety of this approach.

Acylated and unacylated ghrelin protect MC3T3-E1 cells against tert-butyl hydroperoxide-induced oxidative injury: pharmacological characterization of ghrelin receptor and possible epigenetic involvement

Increasing evidence suggests a role for oxidative stress in age-related decrease in osteoblast number and function leading to the development of osteoporosis. This study was undertaken to investigate whether ghrelin, previously reported to stimulate osteoblast proliferation, counteracts tert-butyl hydroperoxide (t-BHP)-induced oxidative damage in MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells as well as to characterize the ghrelin receptor (GHS-R) involved in such activity. Pretreatment with ghrelin (10(-7)-10(-11)M) significantly increased viability and reduced apoptosis of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured with t-BHP (250 μM) for three hours at the low concentration of 10(-9)M as shown by MTT assay and Hoechst-33258 staining. Furthermore, ghrelin prevented t-BHP-induced osteoblastic dysfunction and changes in the cytoskeleton organization evidenced by the staining of the actin fibers with Phalloidin-FITC by reducing reactive oxygen species generation. The GHS-R type 1a agonist, EP1572 (10(-7)-10(-11)M), had no effect against t-BHP-induced cytotoxicity and pretreatment with the selective GHS-R1a antagonist, D-Lys(3)-GHRP-6 (10(-7)M), failed to remove ghrelin (10(-9) M)-protective effects against oxidative injury, indicating that GHS-R1a is not involved in such ghrelin activity. Accordingly, unacylated ghrelin (DAG), not binding GHS-R1a, displays the same protective actions of ghrelin against t-BHP-induced cytotoxicity. Preliminary observations indicate that ghrelin increased the trimethylation of lys4 on histones H3, a known epigenetic mark activator, which may regulate the expression of some genes limiting oxidative damage. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that ghrelin and DAG promote survival of MC3T3-E1 cell exposed to t-BHP-induced oxidative damage. Such effect is independent of GHS-R1a and is likely mediated by a common ghrelin/DAG binding site.

Pathophysiogenesis of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: is prevention of damage antiepileptogenic?

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is frequently associated with hippocampal sclerosis, possibly caused by a primary brain injury that occurred a long time before the appearance of neurological symptoms. This type of epilepsy is characterized by refractoriness to drug treatment, so to require surgical resection of mesial temporal regions involved in seizure onset. Even this last therapeutic approach may fail in giving relief to patients. Although prevention of hippocampal damage and epileptogenesis after a primary event could be a key innovative approach to TLE, the lack of clear data on the pathophysiological mechanisms leading to TLE does not allow any rational therapy. Here we address the current knowledge on mechanisms supposed to be involved in epileptogenesis, as well as on the possible innovative treatments that may lead to a preventive approach. Besides loss of principal neurons and of specific interneurons, network rearrangement caused by axonal sprouting and neurogenesis are well known phenomena that are integrated by changes in receptor and channel functioning and modifications in other cellular components. In particular, a growing body of evidence from the study of animal models suggests that disruption of vascular and astrocytic components of the blood-brain barrier takes place in injured brain regions such as the hippocampus and piriform cortex. These events may be counteracted by drugs able to prevent damage to the vascular component, as in the case of the growth hormone secretagogue ghrelin and its analogues. A thoroughly investigation on these new pharmacological tools may lead to design effective preventive therapies.

Growth hormone secretagogues exert differential effects on skeletal muscle calcium homeostasis in male rats depending on the peptidyl/nonpeptidyl structure

The orexigenic and anabolic effects induced by ghrelin and the synthetic GH secretagogues (GHSs) are thought to positively contribute to therapeutic approaches and the adjunct treatment of a number of diseases associated with muscle wasting such as cachexia and sarcopenia. However, many questions about the potential utility and safety of GHSs in both therapy and skeletal muscle function remain unanswered. By using fura-2 cytofluorimetric technique, we determined the acute effects of ghrelin, as well as of peptidyl and nonpeptidyl synthetic GHSs on calcium homeostasis, a critical biomarker of muscle function, in isolated tendon-to-tendon male rat skeletal muscle fibers. The synthetic nonpeptidyl GHSs, but not peptidyl ghrelin and hexarelin, were able to significantly increase resting cytosolic calcium [Ca²⁺]i. The nonpeptidyl GHS-induced [Ca²⁺]i increase was independent of GHS-receptor 1a but was antagonized by both thapsigargin/caffeine and cyclosporine A, indicating the involvement of the sarcoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. Evaluation of the effects of a pseudopeptidyl GHS and a nonpeptidyl antagonist of the GHS-receptor 1a together with a drug-modeling study suggest the conclusion that the lipophilic nonpeptidyl structure of the tested compounds is the key chemical feature crucial for the GHS-induced calcium alterations in the skeletal muscle. Thus, synthetic GHSs can have different effects on skeletal muscle fibers depending on their molecular structures. The calcium homeostasis dysregulation specifically induced by the nonpeptidyl GHSs used in this study could potentially counteract the beneficial effects associated with these drugs in the treatment of muscle wasting of cachexia- or other age-related disorders.

Protective but not anticonvulsant effects of ghrelin and JMV-1843 in the pilocarpine model of Status epilepticus

In models of status epilepticus ghrelin displays neuroprotective effects mediated by the growth hormone secretagogue-receptor 1a (GHS-R_1a). This activity may be explained by anticonvulsant properties that, however, are controversial. We further investigated neuroprotection and the effects on seizures by comparing ghrelin with a more effective GHS-R_1a agonist, JMV-1843. Rats were treated either with ghrelin, JMV-1843 or saline 10 min before pilocarpine, which was used to induce status epilepticus. Status epilepticus, developed in all rats, was attenuated by diazepam. No differences were observed among the various groups in the characteristics of pilocarpine-induced seizures. In saline group the area of lesion, characterized by lack of glial fibrillary acidic protein immunoreactivity, was of 0.45±0.07 mm² in the hippocampal stratum lacunosum-moleculare, and was accompanied by upregulation of laminin immunostaining, and by increased endothelin-1 expression. Both ghrelin (P<0.05) and JMV-1843 (P<0.01) were able to reduce the area of loss in glial fibrillary acidic protein immunostaining. In addition, JMV-1843 counteracted (P<0.05) the changes in laminin and endothelin-1 expression, both increased in ghrelin-treated rats. JMV-1843 was able to ameliorate neuronal survival in the hilus of dentate gyrus and medial entorhinal cortex layer III (P<0.05 vs saline and ghrelin groups). These results demonstrate diverse protective effects of growth hormone secretagogues in rats exposed to status epilepticus.

Ghrelin Agonist JMV 1843 Increases Food Intake, Body Weight and Expression of Orexigenic Neuropeptides in Mice

Ghrelin and agonists of its receptor GHS-R1a are potential substances for the treatment of cachexia. In the present study, we investigated the acute and long term effects of the GHS R1a agonist JMV 1843 (H Aib-DTrp-D-gTrp-CHO) on food intake, body weight and metabolic parameters in lean C57BL/6 male mice. Additionally, we examined stability of JMV 1843 in mouse blood serum. A single subcutaneous injection of JMV 1843 (0.01-10 mg/kg) increased food intake in fed mice in a dose-dependent manner, up to 5-times relative to the saline-treated group (ED50=1.94 mg/kg at 250 min). JMV 1843 was stable in mouse serum in vitro for 24 h, but was mostly eliminated from mouse blood after 2 h in vivo. Ten days of treatment with JMV 1843 (subcutaneous administration, 10 or 20 mg/kg/day) significantly increased food intake, body weight and mRNA expression of the orexigenic neuropeptide Y and agouti-related peptide in the medial basal hypothalamus and decreased the expression of uncoupling protein 1 in brown adipose tissue. Our data suggest that JMV 1843 could have possible future uses in the treatment of cachexia.

Macimorelin (AEZS-130)-stimulated growth hormone (GH) test: validation of a novel oral stimulation test for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency

CONTEXT

In the absence of panhypopituitarism and low serum IGF-I levels, the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (AGHD) requires confirmation with a GH stimulation test. Macimorelin is a novel, orally active ghrelin mimetic that stimulates GH secretion.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine the diagnostic efficacy and safety of macimorelin in AGHD.

DESIGN

This was a multicenter open-label study comparing the diagnostic accuracy of oral macimorelin with that of arginine+GHRH in AGHD patients and healthy, matched controls. After 43 AGHD patients and 10 controls were tested, the GHRH analog Geref Diagnostic [GHRH(1-29)NH2] became unavailable in the United States. The study was completed by testing 10 additional AGHD patients and 38 controls with macimorelin alone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Peak GH area under the receiver operating characteristic curve after macimorelin was measured.

RESULTS

Fifty AGHD subjects and 48 controls were evaluated. Peak GH levels in AGHD patients and controls after macimorelin were 2.36 ± 5.69 and 17.71 ± 19.11 ng/mL, respectively (P < .0001). With macimorelin, the receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded an optimal GH cut point of 2.7 ng/mL, with 82% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 13% misclassification rate. For subjects receiving both tests, macimorelin showed discrimination comparable with arginine+GHRH (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.99 vs 0.94, respectively, P = .29). Obesity (body mass index > 30 kg/m(2)) was present in 58% of subjects, and peak GH levels were inversely associated with body mass index in controls (r = -0.37, P = .01). Using the separate cut points of 6.8 ng/mL for nonobese and 2.7 for obese subjects reduced the misclassification rate to 11%. Only 1 drug-related serious adverse event, an asymptomatic QT interval prolongation on the electrocardiogram, was reported.

CONCLUSION

Oral macimorelin is safe, convenient, and effective in diagnosing AGHD with accuracy comparable with the arginine+GHRH test.

Pharmacological characterization of the ghrelin receptor mediating its inhibitory action on inflammatory pain in rats

Recent research suggests a role for ghrelin in the modulation of inflammatory disorders. However, the type of ghrelin receptor (GHS-R) involved in both the anti-inflammatory and anti-hyperalgesic actions of ghrelin remains to be characterized. In this study, we examined whether the inhibitory effect of ghrelin in the development of hyperalgesia and edema induced by intraplantar carrageenan administration depends on an interaction with GHS-R1a. Both central (1 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) and peripheral (40 nmol/kg, i.p.) administration of the selective GHS-R1a agonist EP1572 had no effect on carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia measured by Randall-Selitto test and paw edema. Furthermore, pre-treatment with the selective GHS-R1a antagonist, D-lys(3)-GHRP-6 (3 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) failed to prevent the anti-hyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory effects exerted by central ghrelin administration (1 nmol/rat), thus indicating that the type 1a GHS-R is not involved in these peptide activities. Accordingly, both central (1 and 2 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) and peripheral (40 and 80 nmol/kg, i.p.) administration of desacyl-ghrelin (DAG), which did not bind GHS-R1a, induced a significant reduction of the hyperalgesic and edematous activities of carrageenan. In conclusion, we have shown for the first time that DAG shares with ghrelin an inhibitory role in the development of hyperalgesia, as well as the paw edema induced by carrageenan and that a ghrelin receptor different from type 1a is involved in the anti-inflammatory activities of the peptide.

Ghrelin stimulation of growth hormone-releasing hormone neurons is direct in the arcuate nucleus

Background

Ghrelin targets the arcuate nucleus, from where growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) neurones trigger GH secretion. This hypothalamic nucleus also contains neuropeptide Y (NPY) neurons which play a master role in the effect of ghrelin on feeding. Interestingly, connections between NPY and GHRH neurons have been reported, leading to the hypothesis that the GH axis and the feeding circuits might be co-regulated by ghrelin.

Principal Findings

Here, we show that ghrelin stimulates the firing rate of identified GHRH neurons, in transgenic GHRH-GFP mice. This stimulation is prevented by growth hormone secretagogue receptor-1 antagonism as well as by U-73122, a phospholipase C inhibitor and by calcium channels blockers. The effect of ghrelin does not require synaptic transmission, as it is not antagonized by γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamate and NPY receptor antagonists. In addition, this hypothalamic effect of ghrelin is independent of somatostatin, the inhibitor of the GH axis, since it is also found in somatostatin knockout mice. Indeed, ghrelin does not modify synaptic currents of GHRH neurons. However, ghrelin exerts a strong and direct depolarizing effect on GHRH neurons, which supports their increased firing rate.

Conclusion

Thus, GHRH neurons are a specific target for ghrelin within the brain, and not activated secondary to altered activity in feeding circuits. These results support the view that ghrelin related therapeutic approaches could be directed separately towards GH deficiency or feeding disorders.

Ghrelin receptor modulators and their therapeutic potential

Background: Ghrelin is a peptide produced predominantly in the stomach and intestines, and is a natural growth hormone (GH) secretagogue-receptor ligand. It is able to stimulate GH release, but it also exhibits an important role in conditions related to processes regulating nutrition, body composition and growth, and heart, liver, thyroid or kidney dysfunction. Drug discovery efforts initially focused on ghrelin-receptor agonists, known as GH secretagogues, to be used as anabolic agents, but none of them reached the market. Discussion: The latest developments in this field are constituted by the discovery of new nonpeptidic compounds endowed with interesting properties: oxindole agonists are able to exert an increase in the fat-free mass, while ghrelin was reported to increase the fat mass gain, and triazole- and 2,4-diaminopyrimidine-based antagonists were shown to be able to reduce food intake, without inhibition of GH secretion stimulated by an agonist to the ghrelin receptor. Other antagonist compounds (quinazolinones) were discovered as antiobesity/antidiabetic agents. Moreover, inverse agonists have been discovered that are able to reduce weight gain. Conclusions: Taking into account the great number of pathological conditions related to ghrelin, and the discovery of several compounds able to modulate the ghrelin receptor, its importance in the field of medicinal chemistry research is set to increase significantly.

Recent Developments in Ghrelin Receptor Ligands

The 28-amino acid peptide ghrelin is a neuroendocrine hormone synthesized primarily in the stomach. It stimulates growth hormone secretion and appetite, thus promoting food intake and body-weight gain. The pharmacological properties of this peptide are mediated by the growth hormone secretagogue receptor type 1a (GHS-R1a). Given its wide spectrum of biological activities, it is evident that the discovery of ghrelin and its receptor has opened up many perspectives in the fields of neuroendocrine and metabolic research and has had an influence on such fields of internal medicine as gastroenterology, oncology, and cardiology. It is therefore increasingly likely that synthetic, peptidyl, and nonpeptidyl GHS-R1a ligands, acting as agonists, partial agonists, antagonists, or inverse agonists, could have both clinical and therapeutic potential. This review summarizes the various types of GHS-R1a ligands that have been described in the literature and discusses the recent progress made in this research area.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of an oral ghrelin agonist in healthy subjects

CONTEXT

An oral formulation of EP01572, a peptidomimetic growth hormone secretagogue, was studied. An oral delivery system would be preferable in many of the possible therapeutic indications of ghrelin agonists such as EP01572.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to establish the pharmacological profile and the GH-releasing activity of increasing oral doses of EP01572 in healthy volunteers. In addition, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacological effects of EP01572 were investigated after intraduodenal (ID) administration.

SETTING

This study was a single-center escalating dose study with oral and ID applications.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In the first part, EP01572 was given orally to 36 male subjects; the treatment consisted of one oral dose of either EP01572 or placebo (0.005, 0.05, and 0.5 mg/kg body weight). Six subjects received two additional oral doses of EP01572: 0.125 and 0.25 mg/kg body weight. In the second part, the following treatments were performed in a randomized order: 1) administration of a bolus of saline (placebo) to the small intestine; 2) ID administration of a bolus of EP01572 at 0.2 mg/kg body weight; 3) ID perfusion of a bolus of EP01572 at 0.35 mg/kg body weight; and 4) ID perfusion of a bolus of EP01572 at 0.5 mg/kg body weight.

RESULTS

The oral and ID administration of EP01572 induced a rapid and dose-dependent increase in plasma drug concentrations and a potent GH release in healthy male volunteers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that EP01572 was active with regard to stimulation of GH release in humans after oral and ID administration.

Synthesis and Pharmacological in Vitro and in Vivo Evaluations of Novel Triazole Derivatives as Ligands of the Ghrelin Receptor. 1

A new series of growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) analogues based on the 1,2,4-triazole structure were synthesized and evaluated for their in vitro binding and their ability to stimulate intracellular calcium release to the cloned hGHS-1a ghrelin receptor expressed in LLC PK-1 cells. We have synthesized potent ligands of this receptor, some of them behaving as agonists, partial agonists, or antagonists. Some compounds among the most potent, i.e., agonist 29c (JMV2873), partial agonists including 21b (JMV2810), antagonists 19b (JMV2866) and 19c (JMV2844), were evaluated for their in vivo activity on food intake, after sc injection in rodents. Some compounds were found to stimulate food intake like hexarelin; some others were identified as potent hexarelin antagonists in this assay. Among the tested compounds, 21b was identified as an in vitro ghrelin receptor partial agonist, as well as a potent in vivo antagonist of hexarelin-stimulated food intake in rodents. Compound 21b was without effect on GH release from rat. However, in this series of compounds, it was not possible to find a clear correlation between in vitro and in vivo results.

Heterogeneity of ghrelin/growth hormone secretagogue receptors. Toward the understanding of the molecular identity of novel ghrelin/GHS receptors

Ghrelin is a gastric polypeptide displaying strong GH-releasing activity by activation of the type 1a GH secretagogue receptor (GHS-R1a) located in the hypothalamus-pituitary axis. GHS-R1a is a G-protein-coupled receptor that, upon the binding of ghrelin or synthetic peptidyl and non-peptidyl ghrelin-mimetic agents known as GHS, preferentially couples to G(q), ultimately leading to increased intracellular calcium content. Beside the potent GH-releasing action, ghrelin and GHS influence food intake, gut motility, sleep, memory and behavior, glucose and lipid metabolism, cardiovascular performances, cell proliferation, immunological responses and reproduction. A growing body of evidence suggests that the cloned GHS-R1a alone cannot be the responsible for all these effects. The cloned GHS-R1b splice variant is apparently non-ghrelin/GHS-responsive, despite demonstration of expression in neoplastic tissues responsive to ghrelin not expressing GHS-R1a; GHS-R1a homologues sensitive to ghrelin are capable of interaction with GHS-R1b, forming heterodimeric species. Furthermore, GHS-R1a-deficient mice do not show evident abnormalities in growth and diet-induced obesity, suggesting the involvement of another receptor. Additional evidence of the existence of another receptor is that ghrelin and GHS do not always share the same biological activities and activate a variety of intracellular signalling systems besides G(q). The biological actions on the heart, adipose tissue, pancreas, cancer cells and brain shared by ghrelin and the non-acylated form of ghrelin (des-octanoyl ghrelin), which does not bind GHS-R1a, represent the best evidence for the existence of a still unknown, functionally active binding site for this family of molecules. Finally, located in the heart and blood vessels is the scavenger receptor CD36, involved in the endocytosis of the pro-atherogenic oxidized low-density lipoproteins, which is a pharmacologically and structurally distinct receptor for peptidyl GHS and not for ghrelin. This review highlights the most recently discovered features of GHS-R1a and the emerging evidence for a novel group of receptors that are not of the GHS1a type; these appear involved in the transduction of the multiple levels of information provided by GHS and ghrelin.

Evidence for a role of the GHS-R1a receptors in ghrelin inhibition of gastric acid secretion in the rat

Ghrelin, the endogenous ligand of the GH secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) has been previously shown to inhibit gastric acid secretion in pylorus-ligated rats. Two isoforms of GHS-R have been identified: GHS-R(1a) and GHS-R(1b). The present study aimed: (i) to characterise the type of GHS-R involved in the central gastric inhibitory activity of ghrelin by using des-octanoyl ghrelin, and synthetic GHS-R(1a) agonist (EP1572) and antagonist (D-Lys(3)-GHRP-6) and (ii) to investigate the relationship between ghrelin and cortistatin (CST) in the control of gastric acid secretion by using the natural neuropeptide CST-14 and the synthetic octapeptide CST-8. The specific interactions of all the compounds with GHS-R(1a) were determined by comparing their ability to displace labelled ghrelin or somatostatin from its receptors on rat hypothalamic membranes or on rat cardiomyocyte, respectively. Intracerebroventricular administration of 0.01 and 1 nmol/rat des-octanoyl ghrelin did not affect gastric acid secretion in pylorus-ligated rats, whereas EP1572 either i.c.v. (0.01-1 nmol/rat) or i.p. (10 and 20 nmol/kg) inhibited acid gastric secretion. Preteatment with D-Lys(3)GHRP-6 (3 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) was able to remove the inhibitory action of ghrelin (0.01 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) on gastric acid volume and acid output, thus indicating that the type 1a GHS-R likely mediates the gastric inhibitory action of ghrelin. This is supported by binding data showing that D-Lys(3)GHRP-6, but not des-octanoyl ghrelin, binds to hypothalamic GHS-R. CST-14 (1 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) did not affect either basal or ghrelin inhibition of gastric acid secretion. CST-8 (1 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) was able to counteract the gastric ghrelin response. The observation that CST-14 binds both GHR-S and somatostatin receptors, whereas CST-8 specifically displaces only ghrelin binding, indicates that CST-8 behaves as a GHS-R(1a) antagonist.

Biological, physiological, pathophysiological, and pharmacological aspects of ghrelin

Ghrelin is a peptide predominantly produced by the stomach. Ghrelin displays strong GH-releasing activity. This activity is mediated by the activation of the so-called GH secretagogue receptor type 1a. This receptor had been shown to be specific for a family of synthetic, peptidyl and nonpeptidyl GH secretagogues. Apart from a potent GH-releasing action, ghrelin has other activities including stimulation of lactotroph and corticotroph function, influence on the pituitary gonadal axis, stimulation of appetite, control of energy balance, influence on sleep and behavior, control of gastric motility and acid secretion, and influence on pancreatic exocrine and endocrine function as well as on glucose metabolism. Cardiovascular actions and modulation of proliferation of neoplastic cells, as well as of the immune system, are other actions of ghrelin. Therefore, we consider ghrelin a gastrointestinal peptide contributing to the regulation of diverse functions of the gut-brain axis. So, there is indeed a possibility that ghrelin analogs, acting as either agonists or antagonists, might have clinical impact.

New active series of growth hormone secretagogues

New growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) analogues were synthesized and evaluated for growth hormone releasing activity. This series derived from EP-51389 is based on a gem-diamino structure. Compounds that exhibited higher in vivo GH-releasing potency than hexarelin in rat (subcutaneous administration) were then tested per os in beagle dogs and for their binding affinity to human pituitary GHS receptors and to hGHS-R 1a. Compound 7 (JMV 1843, H-Aib-(d)-Trp-(d)-gTrp-formyl) showed high potency in these tests and was selected for clinical studies.(1)