The growth hormone response to pyridostigmine plus growth hormone releasing hormone is not influenced by pubertal maturation

Reliability of clonidine testing for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is currently based on clinical, auxological, biochemical and neuro-radiological investigation. Provocative tests of GH secretion using physiological/pharmacological stimuli are required to confirm GHD. The clonidine test (CT) is widely used to assess GH secretory status. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the reliability of CT and the effect of puberty in a large number of children with short stature who had been evaluated for suspected GHD.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Data were collected retrospectively from 327 children and adolescents with short stature (204 boys and 123 girls, median age 10.5 years (IQR 7.90-12.40) followed in four Italian Paediatric Endocrine Units (Cagliari, Genova, Napoli and Roma) between 2005 and 2013.

MEASUREMENTS

All children underwent CT as the first GH stimulation test after exclusion of other known cause of their short stature.

RESULTS

In 73 prepubertal children and 25 pubertal children, the GH peak after CT was <7 μg/L. GHD was confirmed in 87 (37 organic, 50 idiopathic). Six prepubertal and five pubertal patients showed false positive responses. The median BMI-SDS in these children was similar to that of children with GH peak ≥7 μg/L, and none were obese. Overall, the prevalence of false-positive responses was 3.3%. The median (IQR) peak GH after CT was similar between prepubertal and pubertal GHD (3.80 μg/L [1.7-6.00] vs 3.51 μg/L [0.76-5.74]) and non-GHD (13.70 μg/L [10.70-18.40] vs 12.40 μg/L [9.90-19.25]) children.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that CT is a reliable and safe GH-releasing agent in both prepubertal and pubertal children.

Reduction of the pituitary GH releasable pool in short children with GH neurosecretory dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

The classical 'GH neurosecretory dysfunction' (GHNSD) refers to slowly growing children with normal GH responses to classical provocative tests but impaired spontaneous GH secretion over 24 h frequently leading to low IGF-I levels. Thus it has been assumed that these subjects have insufficiency of spontaneous GH secretion due to neuroendocrine abnormalities in spite of a normal releasable pool of GH. However, classical provocative tests do not reliably assess the maximal somatotroph capacity; thus it is still unclear if the GH pool is really preserved or not. GHRH + arginine test is more potent than the classical tests and evaluates the maximal secretory capacity of somatotroph cells. The GH response to this stimulus is reproducible and also independent of age and puberty.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

We studied the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg iv) + arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg iv) in 19 short children with GHNSD (14 boys and 5 girls, age: 12.1 +/- 0.7 years, pubertal stages I-III, HV-SDS between -1.6 and -4.9; GH peak > 10 micrograms/l after classical stimuli but mean GH concentration (mGHc) < 3 micrograms/l). The results in GHNSD were compared with those in 38 short children with idiopathic or organic severe GHD (GHD, 29 boys and 9 girls, age: 11.2 +/- 0.6 years, pubertal stages I-III, HV-SDS between -1.8 and -4.4; GH peak < 10 micrograms/l after 2 classical provocative tests) and in 83 children with normal or familial short stature (NC, 59 boys and 24 girls, age: 11.5 +/- 0.3 years., pubertal stages I-III; HV-SDS > 25th centile, normal IGF-I levels).

RESULTS

Mean IGF-I levels in GHNSD (121.9 +/- 20.3 micrograms/l) were lower (P < 0.001) than those in NC (270.3 +/- 13.8 micrograms/l) but higher (P < 0.001) than those in GHD (72.0 +/- 4.0 micrograms/l). The mean GH concentration (mGHc) in GHNSD (2.1 +/- 0.1 micrograms/l) was lower (P < 0.01) than that in NC (4.9 +/- 0.5 micrograms/l) but higher (P < 0.01) than that in GHD (1.5 +/- 0.2 micrograms/l). On the other hand, the mean peak GH response to GHRH + ARG in GHNSD (43.7 +/- 3.7 micrograms/l) was markedly higher (P < 0.001) than that in GHD (8.2 +/- 0.9 micrograms/l) but significantly lower (P < 0.01) than that in NC (60. 4 +/- 2.7 micrograms/l). All GHD patients had peak GH responses to GHRH + ARG below the 3rd centile limit of normality (20 micrograms/l), while all GHNSD patients had peak GH responses within the normal range. No significant correlation was found between GH peak after GHRH + ARG, mGHc and IGF-I levels in each group.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that short children with 'GH neurosecretory dysfunction' show reduction in the GH releasable pool evaluated by the provocative and potent GHRH + arginine test. However, the peak GH response to a single GHRH + arginine test in GH neurosecretory dysfunction is always within the normal range indicating that this test as well as classical stimuli does not distinguish normal subjects from GH neurosecretory dysfunction.

GH/IGF-I axis in Prader-Willi syndrome: evaluation of IGF-I levels and of the somatotroph responsiveness to various provocative stimuli. Genetic Obesity Study Group of Italian Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology

Basal IGF-I levels and the GH response to at least two among provocative stimuli such as clonidine (CLO, Catapresan, 150 mcg/m2 p.o.), GHRH (1 mcg/kg i.v.)+arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v. infusion during 30 min) and GHRH+pyridostigmine (PD, Mestinon cpr 60 mg p.o.) have been evaluated in 43 children with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS, 17 males and 26 females, age 3-22 yr, 7 normal weight and 36 obese PWS), in 25 normal short children (NC, 17 males and 8 females, 7.7-18.5 yr) and in 24 children with simple obesity (OB, 14 males, 10 females, 7.7-21.5 yr). Both normal weight and obese PWS had mean IGF-I levels lower than those recorded in NC (p<0.001) and OB (p<0.001). The GH responses to GHRH+ARG and GHRH+PD in NC were similar and higher than that to CLO (p<0.001). In PWS the GH response to GHRH+ARG was higher than that to GHRH+PD (p<0.001) which, in turn, was higher than that to CLO (p<0.001); these responses in PWS were lower than those in normal children (p<0.02) and similar to those in OB. In normal weight PWS the GH responses to GHRH+ARG and to GHRH+PD were similar and higher than to CLO (p<0.05); however, each provocative stimulus elicited a GH rise lower than that in NC (p<0.05). In obese PWS as well as in OB the GH response to GHRH+ARG was higher than that to GHRH+PD (p<0.02) which, in turn, was higher than that to CLO (p<0.001); all GH responses in obese PWS and OB were lower than those in NC (p<0.001) but similar to those in normal weight PWS. In conclusion, patients with PWS show clear reduction of IGF-I levels as well as of the somatotroph responsiveness to provocative stimuli independently of body weight excess. These results strengthen the hypothesis that PWS syndrome is frequently connotated by GH insufficiency.

Hexarelin-induced growth hormone response in short stature. Comparison with growth hormone-releasing hormone plus pyridostigmine and arginine plus estrogen

Hexarelin (HEX) is a synthetic hexapeptide with strong GH-stimulating activity. We evaluated GH response (expressed as maximum value after stimulus [Cmax] and as area under the curve [AUC]) to HEX at the doses of 1 microg/kg i.v. (HEX 1) and 2 microg/kg i.v. (HEX 2), in comparison with the responses to GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v.) + pyridostigmine (PD, 60 mg po) and to arginine (ARG, 0.5 mg/kg i.v.) + ethinylestradiol (EE, 1 mg/day po for 3 days before the stimulation), in 5 subjects with familial short stature (FSS), 11 with constitutional growth delay (CGD), 6 with GH neurosecretory dysfunction (NSD), and 5 with isolated growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Cmax and AUC after HEX 1 were 26.8+/-10.5 ng/ml and 1448+/-514 ng/min x ml in FSS, 23.6+/-14.4 ng/ml and 1146+/-750 ng/min x ml in CGD, 36.9+/-21.5 ng/ml and 2048+/-1288 ng/min x ml in NSD, 9.4+/-5.8 ng/ml and 498+/-200 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS and CGD, p<0.05 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after HEX 2 were 37.7+/-16 ng/ml and 1979+/-888 ng/min x ml in FSS, 32.5+/-16.2 ng/ml and 1613+/-237 ng/min x ml in CGD, 39.7+/-20.7 ng/ml and 2366+/-1569 ng/min xml in NSD, 13.4+/-4.2 ng/ml and 645+/-293 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax in FSS, CGD and NSD p<0.01 vs GHD; AUC in NSD, p<05 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after GHRH+/-PD were 46.6+/-8.8 ng/ml and 3294+/-1031 ng/min x ml in FSS, 25.9+/-11.2 ng/ml and 1464+/-735 ng/min x ml in CGD, 38.8+/-21.7 ng/ml and 2428+/-1399 ng/min x ml in NSD, 8.4+/-6.2 ng/ml and 685+/-572 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS, p<0.001 vs CGD and GHD; Cmax in CGD and NSD, p<0.001 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after ARG+EE were 21.3+/-4.2 ng/ml and 1432+/-514 ng/min x ml in FSS, 14.8+/-10 ng/ml and 805+/-489 ng/min x ml in CGD, 22.2+/-12.8 ng/ml and 1199+/-309 ng/min x ml in NSD, 4.6+/-2.5 ng/ml and 247+/-191 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS, CGD and NSD, p<0.01 vs GHD). Specificity was 62% for HEX 1 and 75% for HEX 2, GHRH+PD and ARG+EE. From a diagnostic point of view, HEX 1 + HEX 2 was the association with the largest percentage of false positives (20% in FSS, 27% in CGD and 33% in NSD), HEX 1 +GHRH+PD resulted in 9% in CGD, while the combined use of HEX 1 or HEX 2 with GHRH+PD or ARG+EE and of GHRH+PD with ARG+EE did not show false positive responses.

IN CONCLUSION

I) the most effective dose of HEX was 2 microg/kg i.v.; 2) HEX did not show more specificity than GHRH+PD and ARG+EE; 3) the association of GHRH+PD with ARG+EE could yield the best results at lower costs, confirming these tests as first-line tools in evaluating GH secretion.

Reduced growth hormone (GH) responsiveness to combined GH-releasing hormone and pyridostigmine administration in the Prader-Willi syndrome

OBJECTIVE

It is unclear whether the blunted GH secretion in Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) is a true deficiency, or merely secondary to obesity. We have investigated the role of obesity in the blunted GH secretion in PWS.

DESIGN

We studied the GH response to a combined administration of GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v. at 0 min) and pyridostigmine (PD) (60 and 120 mg by mouth for children and adults, respectively, at time -60 min), as well as the baseline IGF-I levels, in a group of patients with PWS. Two different control groups were studied with GHRH + PD using the same doses and methods as above: prepubertal and pubertal obese subjects, and prepubertal short normal children. Moreover, in 14 patients with PWS and in the group of short normals the GH response to at least two stimulation tests (insulin tolerance test, clonidine, L-dopa, arginine) had been previously determined.

PATIENTS

Twenty-two PWS patients (10 males and 12 females), 21 with essential obesity (11 males and 10 females), and eight short normal children (4 males and 4 females) were studied after obtaining informed consent.

MEASUREMENTS

Blood samples were taken at -60, -30 and 0 min and then 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after GHRH administration. Serum GH was measured in duplicate by IRMA, and IGF-I by RIA after acid ethanol extraction. Statistical analysis was performed by t-test for unpaired data, and analysis of variance for parametric or nonparametric data, where appropriate.

RESULTS

The GH response to GHRH + PD was significantly lower in PWS patients (AUC: mean +/- SE: 599 +/- 99 micrograms/l/h) if compared with either short normal children (3294 +/- 461 micrograms/l/h: P < 0.0001) or obese subjects (1445 +/- 210 micrograms/l/h: P < 0.005). Low IGF-I concentrations were found in all PWS patients, so that PWS group had mean IGF-I levels significantly lower than the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that subjects with PWS had a reduced GH responsiveness to GHRH + PD associated with subnormal IGF-I levels. These findings suggested that short stature in PWS may be at least partially correlated to the presence of GH deficiency, and that impaired GH secretion is not secondary to obesity.

The growth hormone response to hexarelin in children: reproducibility and effect of sex steroids

We studied the variability of the GH response to the synthetic hexapeptide hexarelin (Hex) and the effect of sex steroids on the GH-releasing effect of Hex in a group of prepubertal short normal children. Twenty-five children were tested on two occasions 3-7 days apart with 2 micrograms/kg, i.v., Hex. The GH response to Hex was reevaluated after testosterone (T) administration in 10 boys, after ethinyl estradiol (EE) administration in 15 children (5 boys and 10 girls), and after oxandrolone (Ox) administration in 8 boys. In the 25 children tested twice, the mean GH peak and mean area under the curve after the first and second tests were similar. The mean (+/- SD) coefficients of variation of the GH peak and area under the curve responses to Hex was 22.7 +/- 21.0% and 24.0 +/- 20.7%, respectively. Priming with T and EE resulted in an increased GH response to Hex [41.8 +/- 21.0 before vs. 71.1 +/- 28.3 after T (P < 0.001); 43.0 +/- 14.5 before vs. 60.0 +/- 20.0 after EE (P < 0.005)], whereas Ox administration had no effect on the Hex-induced GH release. These data confirm that Hex is a potent stimulus for GH secretion in children with a limited intraindividual variability. In addition, we have shown that both T and EE, but not Ox, significantly augment the GH-releasing effect of Hex. Our data suggest that the sex steroid-induced increase in the GH response to Hex is mediated by estrogens.

The effects of clonidine on blood pressure, catecholamine and growth hormone release in hypogonadal men is preserved and not influenced by testosterone replacement therapy

It has been demonstrated that castration impairs the hypotensive effect of clonidine in rat as well as its GH-releasing activity while testosterone replacement restores to normal the effects of alpha-2 adrenoceptor activation. Thus, these data point to main role of the gonadal steroid testosterone in modulating the effects of alpha-2 adrenergic activation on blood pressure, catecholamine and GH release in animal. Aim of the present study was to verify the activity of clonidine on blood pressure, catecholamine and GH release in human male hypogonadism before and after testosterone replacement. To this goal, 14 hypogonadal men (HP, age 33.8 +/- 2.9 yr; BMI < 25 kg/m2; 8 with hypergonadotropic and 6 with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism) received clonidine administration (CLON, 300 micrograms po at 0 min) before and after 3 months of testosterone replacement (testosterone propionate depot, 250 mg i.m. every 21 days). Ten normal adult volunteers (NS, age 31.5 +/- 1.9 yr; BMI < 25 kg/m2) were studied as control group. In all subjects, before and after clonidine administration, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), pulse rate (PR), norepinephrine (NE), epinephrine (E) and GH levels were recorded. In HP basal testosterone levels were lower than those in NS (1.25 +/- 0.3 vs 7.34 +/- 1.5 ng/ml, p < 0.05) and were restored to normal by hormonal replacement (6.91 +/- 1.3 ng/mL) in HP, both SBP and DBP as well as PR were normal in basal conditions and were not modified by testosterone replacement. Both before and during testosterone CLON lowered SBP, DBP and PR in HP to the same extent observed in NS. In HP, basal NE levels were lower than those in NS (0.85 +/- 0.15 vs 1.28 +/- 0.19 nmol/l, p < 0.05) and were restored to normal during testosterone replacement (1.25 +/- 0.13 nmol/l). On the other hand, basal E levels in HP were similar to those in NS (179 +/- 42 vs 197 +/- 38 pmol/l) and were not modified by testosterone therapy (167 +/- 28 pmol/l). In HP, both before and during testosterone replacement, CLON reduced NE (0.44 +/- 0.10 and 0.58 +/- 0.07 nmol/l) levels to the same levels recorded in NS (0.68 +/- 0.08 nmol/l). Basal GH and IGF-I levels in HP (1.15 +/- 0.5 and 234 +/- 42 micrograms/l, respectively) were similar to those in NS (1.18 +/- 0.4 and 221 +/- 38 micrograms/l, respectively) and were not modified by testosterone (1.35 +/- 0.6 and 256 +/- 32 micrograms/l, respectively). CLON administration induced a clear GH response in HP (F = 37; p < 0.001) which overlapped with that recorded in NS and was not modified by testosterone (F = 1.7; P = NS). Our present findings demonstrate that, differently from in animal, in man testosterone has no role in modulating the effects of alpha-2 adrenergic activation by clonidine on blood pressure, catecholamine and GH release. On the other hand, our data suggest the existence in male hypogonadism of a reduced basal noradrenergic activity which is restored by testosterone replacement.

Effect of testosterone replacement therapy on the somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH alone or combined with pyridostigmine and on sympathoadrenal activity in patients with hypogonadism

There is evidence suggesting that androgens influence GH secretion in man. Our aim was to verify whether the GH releasable pool is preserved and influenced by testosterone replacement in male hypogonadism. To this goal, in eight male hypogonadal patients (HP, age 32.2 +/- 5.0 yr; Body Mass Index 23.9 +/- 1.1 kg/m2) before and after 3 months testosterone therapy, we studied the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg iv) alone and combined with pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg po), a cholinesterase inhibitor which likely inhibits hypothalamic somatostatin release allowing exploration of the maximal somatotrope secretory pool. Sixteen normal subjects (NS, age 30.1 +/- 3.5 yr; Body Mass Index 22.5 +/- 1.8 kg/m2) were studied as controls. The GH response to GHRH in HP was similar to that in NS (AUC, mean +/- SE: 1238 +/- 362 vs 1018 +/- 182 micrograms/L/h). PD potentiated to the same extent the GH response to GHRH in both groups (2092 +/- 807 and 2840 +/- 356 micrograms/L/h). After three month testosterone therapy, in HP the GH responses to GHRH alone (1352 +/- 612 micrograms/L/h) and combined with PD (1948 +/- 616 microgram/L/h) were unchanged. Also IGF-I levels in HP were similar to those in NS (222 +/- 42 vs 210.6 +/- 55.8 micrograms/L) and were unchanged during testosterone replacement (280 +/- 31 micrograms/L). As androgens have been reported to modulate sympathoadrenal activity in the rat, both before and during testosterone replacement, we also measured plasma catecholamine levels. Basal NE (p < 0.05) but not E levels were lower in HP than in NS; testosterone restored basal NE levels to normal without affecting basal E. delta absolute increase of NE and E (p < 0.05 and 0.01 vs baseline, respectively) after PD in HP were similar to those in NS and were unchanged during testosterone replacement. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that the GH releasable pool is preserved in male hypogonadism. As in this condition a reduction of spontaneous GH secretion has been reported, it could be due to neurosecretory dysfunction but not to pituitary impairment. Subtle alterations of sympathoadrenal activity seem to be present in male hypogonadism and reversed by testosterone replacement.

Somatostatinergic tone in children on chronic haemodialysis and after renal transplantation

The role of somatostatinergic tone (SST) in growth hormone (GH) neuroregulation in children with chronic renal failure (CRF) and short stature (mean height standard deviation score -3.47) was investigated. Ten children (9 males, 1 female), mean age 13.4 years (range 8-17 years), five with renal transplants (TP) and five on chronic haemodialysis (HD), underwent three separate investigations: (1) measurement of spontaneous GH secretion: (2) measurement of GH after infusion of GH releasing hormone (GHRH); (3) measurement of GH following treatment with pyridostigmine bromide (PD) and subsequent infusion of GHRH. All patients showed normal or exaggerated spontaneous nocturnal GH secretion (mean concentration values ranging between 3.8 and 19.07 ng/ml). In four of ten patients GHRH was not able to cause an increase in GH levels (mean peak GH 7.35 +/- 2.05 ng/ml) while PD pretreatment reinstated the GH response to GHRH (mean peak GH 55.25 +/- 17.23 ng/ml) in these children. In the other patients in whom GHRH-induced GH release was normal or exaggerated (mean peak GH 42.0 +/- 13.8 ng/ml). PD did not potentiate the GH response to GHRH (mean peak GH 54.83 +/- 7.88 ng/ml). These different types of responses were observed both in TP and HD patients. Our data indicate that: (1) PD potentiates the response to GHRH only when GHRH alone is not able to cause GH release, suggesting that SST is already reduced in patients with a normal or exaggerated GH response to GHRH; (2) in CRF patients the SST can be either reduced or increased, at least during the daytime.