Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is feasible for adenomas throughout the entire rectum: a prospective study

Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for the treatment of rectal lesions involving the dentate line

BACKGROUND

The ideal treatment of epithelial neoplastic rectal lesions involving the dentate line is a controversial issue. Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the most commonly used resection technique, but it is associated with high recurrence rates. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of rectal lesions, but evidence is lacking concerning its application close to the dentate line. The aim of our study is to compare ESD and EMR for the treatment of epithelial rectal lesions involving the dentate line.

METHODS

We identified all cases of endoscopic resections of rectal lesions involving the dentate line performed in two German high-volume centers between 2010 and 2022. Periinterventional and follow-up data were collected and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 68 ESDs and 62 EMRs meeting our inclusion criteria. ESD showed a significant advantage in en bloc resection rates (89.7% vs. 9.7%; P = 0.001) and complete resection rates (72.1% vs. 9.7%; P = 0.001). The overall curative resection rate was similar between both groups (ESD: 92.6%, EMR: 83.9%; P = 0.324), whereas in the subgroup of low-risk adenocarcinomas ESD was curative in 100% of the cases vs. 14% in the EMR group (P = 0.002). There was one local recurrence after ESD (1,5%) vs. 16 (25.8%) after EMR (P < 0.0001), and the EMR patients required an average of three further interventions.

CONCLUSION

ESD is superior to EMR for the treatment of epithelial rectal lesions involving the dentate line and should be considered the treatment of choice.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal villous tumours: Can we rely solely on preoperative biopsies and the surgeon’s experience?

Background

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery has become the standard of treatment for rectal villous adenomas. However, the role of preoperative imaging for these lesions is not clear. The aim of this study was to compare the value of preoperative imaging and surgeon clinical staging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with rectal villous adenomas having transanal endoscopic microsurgery resection.

Methods

We conducted a single-centre comparative retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery surgery for rectal villous adenomas from 2011 to 2013. The intervention was preoperative imaging versus surgeon clinical staging. The primary outcome was the accuracy of clinical staging by preoperative imaging and surgeon clinical staging according to the histopathologic staging.

Results

A total of 146 patients underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery surgery for rectal villous adenomas. One hundred and twelve (76.7%) of those patients had no preoperative imaging while 34 patients (23.3%) had either endorectal ultrasound (22 patients) or magnetic resonance imaging (12 patients). Surgeon staging was accurate in 89.3% of cases whereas staging by endorectal ultrasound was accurate in 40.9% cases and magnetic resonance imaging was accurate in 0% of cases. In the imaging group, inaccurate staging would have led to unnecessary radical surgery in 44.0% of patients.

Conclusion

This study was subject to selection bias because of its retrospective nature and the limited number of patients with imaging. Patients with rectal villous tumours without invasive carcinoma on biopsies and without malignant characteristics on appearance in the judgment of an experienced colorectal surgeon might not benefit from preoperative imaging before undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery procedures.

Peritoneal perforation during transanal endoscopic microsurgery is not associated with significant short-term complications

BACKGROUND

In patients treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), breach of the peritoneal cavity is a feared intraoperative challenge. Our aim is to analyze predictors and short-term outcomes of patients with peritoneal perforation (TEM-P) when compared to similar patients with no peritoneal compromise (TEM-N).

METHODS

At St. Paul's Hospital, demographic, surgical, pathologic, and follow-up data for all patients treated by TEM is maintained in a prospectively populated database. A retrospective review was performed and two groups were established for comparison: TEM-P and TEM-N. Statistical analysis was performed using student's t or chi-squared test, where appropriate.

RESULTS

Of 619 patients treated by TEM between 2007 and 2016, 39 (6%) patients were in the TEM-P group and 580 (94%) in the TEM-N group. There were no differences between the groups in patient age, gender, histology, or tumor size. Patients who had peritoneal perforations had more proximal lesions (11 vs. 7 cm, p < 0.0001), anterior lesions (56 vs. 43%, p < 0.05), and longer operations (80 vs. 51 min, p < 0.005). While most defects were closed endoluminally, 2 patients with perforation were converted to transabdominal surgery. There was a difference in overall hospital stay with TEM-P patients staying on average 2 days in hospital with fewer patients managed as day surgery (31 vs. 73%, p < 0.0001). There were no mortalities or significant 30-day complications in the TEM-P group and only one patient required readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

The St. Paul's Hospital TEM experience suggests patients with peritoneal breach during TEM can be safely managed with outcomes similar to patients without peritoneal entry. Proximal, anterior lesions are at highest risk of peritoneal perforation.

Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps and selected malignant tumors: caution concerning intermediate-term functional results

PURPOSE

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is gaining worldwide popularity as an alternative for the transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) method for the local excision of rectal polyps and selected neoplasms. Data on patient reported outcomes regarding short-term follow-up are scarce; data on functional outcomes for long-term follow-up is non-existent.

METHODS

We used the fecal incontinence severity index (FISI) to prospectively assess the fecal continence on the intermediate-term follow-up after TAMIS. The primary outcome measure is postoperative fecal continence. Secondary outcome measures are as follows: perioperative and intermediate-term morbidity.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (m = 21:f = 21), median age 68.5 (range 34-94) years, were included in the analysis. In four patients (9.5%), postoperative complications occurred. The median follow-up was 36 months (range 24-48). Preoperative mean FISI score was 8.3 points. One year after TAMIS, mean FISI score was 5.4 points (p = 0.501). After 3 years of follow-up, mean FISI score was 10.1 points (p = 0.01). Fecal continence improved in 11 patients (26%). Continence decreased in 20 patients (47.6%) (mean FISI score 15.2 points, [range 3-31]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that the incidence of impaired fecal continence after TAMIS is substantial; however, the clinical significance of this deterioration seems minor. The present data is helpful in acquiring informed consent and emphasizes the need of proper patient information. Functional results seem to be comparable to results after TEMS. Furthermore, we confirmed TAMIS is safe and associated with low morbidity.

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Implementation in Ultra-Low Anterior Resection

BACKGROUND

Distal rectal cancer resection is an ongoing challenge for the colorectal surgeon. In recent years new technical approaches, especially with implementation of transanal platforms were developed to help in the visualization and resection of these tumors. Nevertheless, the use of these platforms is demanding with significant complications during the onset phase.

METHODS

Patients with very low rectal cancer were operated on in a single tertiary center with a combined abdominal and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) approach. Demographic, pathological, and surgical data were collected retrospectively with an emphasis on distal margin involvement.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were operated on during the study period. All patients had negative distal resection margins with a low complication rate. The distant metastasis and local recurrence rates were low with a mean follow-up of 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

TEM provides an appealing and viable option for the resection of low rectal cancer in a combined transabdominal and transanal approach in patients with a good response after neoadjuvant treatment. This is one of the available platforms a colorectal surgeon might benefit from having in his armamentarium. It has a very low complication rate with maintenance of oncological principles, enabling a clear visualization of the distal rectum, and thus ensures free distal resection margins.

Peritoneal perforation is less a complication than an expected event during transanal endoscopic microsurgery: experience from 194 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

Indications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) have been extended to technically challenging tumors, which may be associated with an increased risk of peritoneal perforation (PP). The aim of the present study was to investigate the occurrence, management and outcome of PP in patients having TEM.

METHODS

All the patients who had TEM for rectal adenoma or adenocarcinoma in our unit were included. Patients in whom PP occurred (Group A) were compared to those without PP (Group B).

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2015, 194 TEM (116 men, median age 66 [range 21-100] years) were divided into Groups A (n = 28, 14%) and B (n = 166). The latter group included four patients, in whom a laparoscopy did not confirm suspicion of PP made during TEM. In 2 of 28 patients (7%), the diagnosis of PP was made postoperatively during reoperation for peritonitis. For the 26 other patients (93%), routine exploratory laparoscopy was performed with suture of the peritoneal defect on the pouch of Douglas in 24 cases and a rectal suture alone in 2 cases. Independent predictive factors for PP were: distance from the anal verge >10 cm (OR = 3.6), circumferential tumor (OR = 3.0) and anterior location (OR = 2.7). Hospital stay was significantly longer in Group A (7.5 [3-31] days) than in Group B (4 [1-38] days; p < 0.0001), whereas there was no significant difference regarding postoperative morbidity and recurrence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that PP is not a very rare event during TEM, especially in anterior, circumferential and/or high rectal tumors. Laparoscopic treatment of PP is feasible and safe. The occurrence of PP is not associated with poor oncologic results.

Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery

Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) techniques encompass a variety of approaches, including transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery. These allow a surgeon to perform local excision of rectal lesions with minimal morbidity and the potential to spare the need for proctectomy. As understanding of the long-term outcomes from these procedures has evolved, so have the indications for TES. In this study, we review the development of TES, its early results, and the evolution of new surgical techniques. In addition, we evaluate the most recent research on indications and outcomes in rectal cancer.

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Patients With Rectal Tumors: A Single Institution's Experience

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to look at our complication rates and recurrence rates, as well as the need for further radical surgery, in treating patients with benign and early malignant rectal tumors by using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

METHODS

Our study included 130 patients who had undergone TEM for rectal adenomas and early rectal cancer from December 2009 to December 2015 at the Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Lithuania. Patients underwent digital and endoscopic evaluation with multiple biopsies. For preoperative staging, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging or endorectal ultrasound was performed. We recorded the demographics, operative details, final pathologies, postoperative lengths of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and recurrences.

RESULTS

The average tumor size was 2.8 ± 1.5 cm (range, 0.5-8.3 cm). 102 benign (78.5%) and 28 malignant tumors (21.5%) were removed. Of the latter, 23 (82.1%) were pT1 cancers and 5 (17.9%) pT2 cancers. Of the 5 patients with pT2 cancer, 2 underwent adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 1 underwent an abdominoperineal resection, 1 refused further treatment and 1 was lost to follow up. No intraoperative complications occurred. In 7 patients (5.4%), postoperative complications were observed: urinary retention (4 patients, 3.1%), postoperative hemorrhage (2 patients, 1.5%), and wound dehiscence (1 patient, 0.8%). All complications were treated conservatively. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.3 days.

CONCLUSION

TEM in our experience demonstrated low complication and recurrence rates. This technique is recommended for treating patients with a rectal adenoma and early rectal cancer and has good prognosis.

The implementation of a transanal endoscopic microsurgery programme: initial experience with surgical performance

AIM

Despite transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) being used for over 30 years, there has been slow adoption of this modality in many centres. There remains a paucity of research regarding the learning curve and early performance of surgeons who begin to offer TEM. We sought to determine predictors of longer rates of tumour excision and improvements in operative time in a newly established TEM programme.

METHOD

All patients who underwent TEM at the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada, between October 2009 and September 2014 were included. Data were abstracted through a retrospective chart review. The average rate of lesion excision (ARE) was calculated to standardize the operation time by size of the pathological specimen (min/cm³ ), representing a measure of surgical efficiency. Surgical efficiency was plotted using restricted cubic splines. Predictors of higher ARE were determined using multivariable regression.

RESULTS

During the study period 108 patients underwent TEM. ARE was available for 95 patients of mean age 67.2 years. The mean ARE was 18.6 min/cm³ . On adjusting for important covariates, the ARE improved with each additional case until 16 cases were completed. Significant predictors of higher ARE on multivariable analysis were age < 50 years, experience of fewer than five cases, and carcinoid/gastrointestinal stromal tumour or scar histology.

CONCLUSION

Operative efficiency appears to improve as surgeons completed 16 TEM cases. We have identified important factors that result in longer operating time. The study has important implications with regard to surgical training and operative planning for new TEM programmes.

Transanal Endoscopic Operation for Rectal Tumor: Short-term Outcomes and Learning Curve Analysis

PURPOSE

We aim to report outcomes and learning curve of transanal endoscopic operation (TEO) for rectal tumors, using standard laparoscopic instruments under a magnifying laparoscopic monitor view.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2012 to July 2014, local excision was performed using a TEO system in 46 consecutive patients with rectal tumors. Patient and tumor characteristics and perioperative outcomes were prospectively assessed.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 56 years for 15 women and 31 men. The mean tumor size was 1.8 cm, and the mean distance from the anal verge was 7.8 cm. The mean operative time was 85 minutes, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.5 days. The postoperative pathologic diagnosis was adenocarcinoma for 17 patients (37%), adenoma for 4 patients (9%), carcinoid tumor for 23 patients (50%), and leiomyoma and lipoma for the 2 remaining patients (2%). A positive resection margin was documented for 4 patients (9%). No mortality was associated with the procedure although postoperative bleeding, leakage, perianal fistula, fecal incontinence, and voiding difficulty developed in 8 patients. According to the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis, the operation time and hospital stay significantly decreased after 17 case experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

TEO is a feasible and safe treatment option for local excision of rectal tumors. TEO has the advantage of being a precise surgical procedure with a stable and magnifying endoscopic view. However, TEO requires a learning period and a careful selection of patients through proper indications and preoperative diagnostics.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal adenomas: single center experience

INTRODUCTION

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a method of choice for the local treatment of rectal adenomas. Though generally considered as a safe method, some authors have expressed skepticism about the anorectal function following TEM.

AIM

To review our experience in using TEM for removal of rectal adenomas. We focused on morbidity, local recurrence rates, and anorectal function following the operation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 72 patients who underwent TEM for rectal adenomas from December 2009 to November 2014 at the Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Institute. Of the 72 patients, 31 (43.1%) were lost in the follow-up. We recorded the demographics, operative details, final pathology, post-operative length of stay, post-operative complications, recurrences and functional outcome for each of the 41 (56.9%) remaining participants.

RESULTS

Of the 41 eligible patients, 19 (46.3%) were male and 22 (53.7%) were female. The mean age of our patients was 66.8 years. There were no intraoperative complications. In 4 (9.8%) cases, postoperative complications were observed - urinary retention (2 cases, 4.9%) and postoperative hemorrhage (2 cases, 4.9%). All complications were treated conservatively. There was a single case (2.4%) of adenoma recurrence during the follow-up period. The mean score of the FISI questionnaire was 7.6 ±9.2 (ranging from 0 to 36), and the mean Wexner score was 2.3 ±3.4 (ranging from 0 to 17).

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in our experience demonstrated low complication and recurrence rates, and good functional results. We conclude that TEM is an effective and safe method for the treatment of rectal adenomas.

The Role of Transanal Surgery in the Management of T1 Rectal Cancers

The management of T1 rectal cancers is based on finding the balance between optimal oncologic outcomes and acceptable functional results for the patient. While radical resection involving a proctectomy is considered the most oncologically adequate option, its adverse effects on patient reported outcomes makes this a less than ideal choice in certain circumstances. While local excision can circumvent some of the adverse functional outcomes, its inadequacy in assessing metastatic lymph node disease and the subsequent negative impact of untreated positive lymph nodes on patient prognosis is a cause for concern. As a result, the therapeutic strategy has to be based on patient and disease-related factors in order to identify the best treatment choice that maximizes survival benefit and preserves health-related quality of life. After adequate preoperative staging work up, in selected patients with favorable pathological features, local excision can be considered. These cancers can be removed by transanal local excision or transanal endoscopic microsurgery, depending on the location of the cancer and expertise available. While perioperative morbidity is minimal, close postoperative follow-up is essential.

Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal entry during transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) can usually be managed transanally with full-thickness suture closure by experienced operators. The preliminary safety of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) has been demonstrated, but the reported experience with upper rectal tumors is limited. The incidence and management of peritoneal entry during transanal endoscopic surgery across various platforms have not been previously evaluated.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all transanal endoscopic resections performed at a single institution between January 2008 and December 2014 was conducted. Cases with and without peritoneal entry were evaluated with respect to transanal platform used, surgical indication, size, location and distance from the anal verge, and incidence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 78 transanal endoscopic procedures were performed on 76 patients using the rigid transanal endoscopic operation (TEO, 65.4 %), TEM (26.9 %), and TAMIS platform (7.7 %). The most common surgical indication included endoscopically unresectable adenomas (50 %). The average distance of lesions from the anal verge (AV) was 9.6 cm (range 4-20 cm). Peritoneal entry occurred in 22 cases (28.2 %). Platform used (TAMIS vs. rigid, p < 0.05), mean distance from the AV (p < 0.0001), location along the rectum (p = 0.01), and mean specimen size (p = 0.01) were associated with a higher likelihood of peritoneal entry. All rectal defects associated with peritoneal entry were successfully closed transanally except for two (TEM and TEO) cases that required conversion to laparoscopic low anterior resection and laparoscopic Hartmann's, respectively. There were four TAMIS cases that required conversion to TEO platforms.

CONCLUSION

In this high-risk TEM, TEO, and TAMIS series (one-third of rectal lesions located in the upper rectum), 91 % of all peritoneal entries were managed transanally without increased morbidity. TAMIS for upper rectal lesions was associated with a high risk of complicated peritoneal entry requiring conversion to a rigid platform.

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): new treatment for early rectal cancer and large rectal polyps—experience of an Italian center

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive technique for excision of rectal tumors that avoids conventional pelvic resectional surgery along with its risks and side effects. Although appealing, the associated cost and complex learning curve limit TEM use by colorectal surgeons. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) has emerged as an alternative to TEM. This platform uses ordinary laparoscopic instruments to achieve high-quality local excision. The aim of the study is to assess reliability of the technique. From July 2012 to August 2013, 15 consecutive patients with rectal pathology underwent TAMIS. After a single-incision laparoscopic surgery port was introduced into the anal canal, a pneumorectum was established with a laparoscopic device followed by transanal excision with conventional laparoscopic instruments, including graspers, electrocautery, and needle drivers. Patient demographics, operative data, and pathologic data were recorded. Of the 15 patients, 10 had rectal cancers (six T1 lesions and four T2 after preoperative chemoradiotherapy). The remainder of patients had a local excision for voluminous benign rectal adenomas. The median length of the lesions from the anal verge was 7 cm (range, 4 to 20 cm). The median operating time was 86 minutes (range, 33 to 160 minutes). There was no surgical morbidity or mortality. The median postoperative hospital stay was two days (range, 1 to 4 days). TAMIS seems to be a feasible and safe treatment option for early rectal cancer. We believe that this new technique is easy to perform, cost-effective, and less traumatic to the anal sphincter compared with traditional TEM.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is the intraluminal excision of rectal lesions with the use of instrumentation to maintain a stable pneumorectum, enabling a magnified view of the target lesion. Despite suggested benefits over traditional transanal excision, there is no consensus on which technique is superior.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the current study is to use meta-analytical techniques to compare transanal endoscopic microsurgery with transanal excision.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library was performed.

STUDY SELECTION

All studies comparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery with transanal excision were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery was compared with transanal excision by using random-effects methods to combine data. Data are presented as ORs with 95% CIs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcomes measured were postoperative complication rate, negative microscopic margin rate, specimen fragmentation rate, and lesion recurrence.

RESULTS

Six comparative series comparing outcomes following 927 local excisions were identified. There was no difference between techniques in postoperative complication rate (OR, 1.018; 95% CI, 0.658-1.575; p = 0.937). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery had a higher rate of negative microscopic margins in comparison with transanal excision (OR, 5.281; 95% CI, 3.201-8.712; p < 0.001). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery had a reduced rate of specimen fragmentation (OR, 0.096; 95% CI, 0.044-0.209; p < 0.001) and lesion recurrence (OR, 0.248; 95% CI, 0.154-0.401; p < 0.001) compared with transanal excision. There was no across-study heterogeneity for any end point.

LIMITATIONS

Most studies were retrospectively designed, and there were variations in patient populations and duration of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data are limited because of a lack of randomized controlled trials. However, based on current evidence, transanal endoscopic microsurgery is oncologically superior to transanal excision for the excision of rectal neoplasms.

Completion surgery following transanal endoscopic microsurgery: assessment of quality and short- and long-term outcome

AIM

Patients with unfavourable pathology after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) should be offered completion surgery (CS) if appropriate. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the short-term outcome and long-term oncological results of CS and identify factors compromising the quality of resection specimens.

METHOD

Data were retrieved and analysed on patients who underwent CS from a comprehensive national TEM database (1992-2008) and the institutional prospective database from the Oxford University Hospitals (2008-2011).

RESULTS

There were 36 patients eligible for analysis. Postoperative complications occurred in 19 and were minor (grade I-II) in 13 and major (grade III-V) in six patients. The quality of the resected specimen was graded as good in 23 (64%), moderate in six (16.6%) and poor in seven (19.4%). Full-thickness excision by TEM (P = 0.03), an interval to CS greater than 7 weeks (P = 0.05) and distally located lesions (P = 0.04) were associated with increased risk for an inferior surgical specimen. Overall survival after CS was 91% at 1 year and 83% at 5 years. Patients with a 'good' TME specimen had significantly improved disease-free survival compared with patients with an 'inferior' specimen (100 vs 51%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients having full-thickness TEM excision, distally placed lesions and a long interval (> 7 weeks) to CS were likely to have an inferior TME specimen. The results confirm that CS after TEM does not negatively influence local recurrence and survival, but the reduced disease-free survival in patients with an inferior specimen is of concern.

Transanal minimally invasive surgery: initial experience and short-term functional results

BACKGROUND

Currently, the preferred method for local excision of rectal polyps is transanal endoscopic microsurgery, avoiding rectal resection. Transanal minimally invasive surgery is a relatively new technique using a disposable port in combination with conventional laparoscopic instruments. This method is less expensive as compared with transanal endoscopic microsurgery, relatively easy to learn, and available. Despite wide adoption of transanal minimally invasive surgery, to date only a few series on the implementation and use of this technique are reported, and detailed information on the effect of transanal minimally invasive surgery on fecal continence is not available.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this work was to prospectively assess the functional outcome after transanal minimally invasive surgery using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index preoperatively and postoperatively.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a large teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients included those who underwent transanal minimally invasive surgery between October 2011 and September 2013.

INTERVENTIONS

Transanal minimally invasive surgery was studied.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We measured postoperative surgical and functional results.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients underwent transanal minimally invasive surgery during our study period. Short-term morbidity rate was 14%, and positive resection margins were reported in 6 cases (16%); in 1 of these patients, a local recurrence was observed. Overall, there was a significant decline in preoperative and postoperative Fecal Incontinence Severity Index scores (p = 0.02), indicating an improvement in anorectal function after transanal minimally invasive surgery for patients with impaired preoperative continence. Seventeen patients (49%) had impaired continence before transanal minimally invasive surgery (mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score = 21). Continence improved in 15 (88%) of these patients after surgery; no change was observed in 1 patient (6%), and continence further decreased in another. In addition, 18 patients (51%) had normal preoperative continence (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score = 0), of which 83% had no change in functionality, and continence decreased in 3.

LIMITATIONS

No quality of life was measured.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term functional results of transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps are excellent and comparable to functional results using the dedicated transanal endoscopic microsurgery equipment. More research on outcome after transanal minimally invasive surgery is needed to assess morbidity rates and oncologic clearance.

Single incision laparoscopic surgery - trans anal endoscopic microsurgery: A technological innovation

Trans anal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) first burst upon the scene several decades ago and then underwent a period of immersion. We have herein reported our experience in two cases who underwent TEM using laparoscopic techniques. The advent of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has made great inroads into various fields of general and gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. We decided to make use of the same technique in TEM for two patients who had large sessile villous adenomas of the rectum. We used this port and fixed it transanally to the edge of the anus. Carbon dioxide used for insufflation in laparoscopic surgery was used through one of the ports, and a telescope was inserted to the larger port. We made sure that the entire polyp was cut out completely until the circular muscle of the internal sphincter was clearly exposed. Next, the cut edges of the rectum were undermined between the mucosa and the circular muscles in order to bring the cut edges closer together. We were able to perform this SILS TEM in two cases. In both the cases, well differentiated villous adenoma (colonoscopically, biopsy proven before surgery) was confirmed after excision. The question has been raised whether TEM is the new laparoscopy for anorectal surgery. Increasingly, several reports are showing promise for treatment for early stage cancers and large rectal adenomas using TEM. Adoption of our technique using the SILS port that has not been previously described in medical literature, seems to be a promising tool for the future.

TEM first burst upon the scene several decades ago and then under went a period of immersion. In recent years, with the onset of laparoscopic surgery, the thoughts and the ideas of using a laparoscopic surgical technique have invaded the area of colorectal cancer as well. We have herein reported our experience in two cases who underwent TEM using laparoscopic techniques.

Early discharge following transanal endoscopic microsurgery is safe

AIM

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was developed as an alternative to major surgery for rectal tumors; however, there is no consensus as to the optimal postoperative length of stay. The aim of this large series is to show that a policy of presumed early discharge is safe.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients undergoing TEM at a single center between 2008 and 2011 were included. Data on demographics, tumor morphology, length of stay, and complications were collected from a prospectively collected database and computer records.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were included, with a mean tumor size of 4.6 cm (range, 0.6-10 cm). The majority were adenomas (71%). Median stay was 1 day, with most (77%) patients being discharged within the 23-hour policy. Neither age nor tumor size affected the length of stay. There were five complications (7.6%), and 2 patients (3%) required readmission following discharge. No complications arose in patients discharged within 23 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients were safely discharged within 23 hours. No early-discharge patient suffered complications or required readmission. The overall complication rate was consistent with other published series, and neither age nor tumor size adversely affected outcome. A routine 23-hour discharge policy can thus be recommended for TEM patients.

Outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery with intraperitoneal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery has gained increasing popularity as a treatment alternative for early stage rectal neoplasms. With continued advances in technique and experience, more proximal rectal tumors are being surgically managed by using transanal endoscopic microsurgery with an intraperitoneal anastomosis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of patients who have undergone intraperitoneal anastomosis with the use of the transanal endoscopic microsurgery technique.

DESIGN

A prospective, single-surgeon database documented 445 consecutive patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery from October 1, 1996 through January 1, 2012. We retrospectively reviewed information from all patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery with an intraperitoneal anastomosis in this prospective database.

SETTINGS

All procedures took place in an inpatient hospital setting.

PATIENTS

All patients satisfied workup criteria to undergo surgery for rectal neoplasm.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasm.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Size and pathology of lesion, length of procedure, hospital stay, estimated blood loss, margin status, and complications were the outcomes measured.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery had definitively documented intraperitoneal entry and anastomosis. Median follow-up was 12 months (range, 0.5-111 months). There were no operative mortalities. Procedure-related complications included urinary retention (11%), fever (11%), and fecal seepage (4%). Four patients (14%) had positive margins on final pathology. One patient (3%) required abdominal exploration for an anastomotic leak but did not require diversion.

LIMITATIONS

Although this study analyzes prospectively collected data, it is nonetheless a retrospective analysis that can introduce bias. Because this is a single-center study with a relatively homogenous population, the results may not be generalizable. Our sample size may also be underpowered to detect clinically significant outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery with intraperitoneal anastomosis can be safely performed without fecal diversion by experienced surgeons.

Transanal minimal invasive surgery with the Endorec(TM) trocar: a low cost but effective technique

PURPOSE

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a well-established surgical approach for local excision of benign adenomas and early-stage rectal cancer. This technique is expensive and associated with a long learning curve. To avoid these obstacles, we have developed an alternative approach using the Endorec(TM) trocar (Aspide, France), which combines the advantages of local transanal excision and single-port access. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of this technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourteen consecutive patients underwent transanal resection using Endorec trocar and standard laparoscopic instruments. A retrospective evaluation of the outcome of this technique was performed.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were successfully operated. Rectal lesions included adenoma in ten patients, T1 adenocarcinoma in three and one T2 adenocarcinoma not amenable for abdominal surgery. The average distal margin from the anal verge was 10 cm (range 5-17 cm), and the mean diameter was 3.5 cm (range 1-5 cm). Negative margins were obtained in 13 patients (92,8 %). Median operating time was 60 min (range 20-100). The excisional area was sutured in nine patients. Median postoperative stay was 4 days (range 1-13). Postoperative complications (21 %) included postoperative fever in one patient and two patients were readmitted with rectal blood loss 6 and 15 days postoperatively and were treated with conservative measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our current data show that transanal surgery using Endorec trocar is feasible and safe. Although long-term outcomes and definite indications should be yet evaluated, we believe that this new technique offers a promising alternative to TEM.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is a well established method of accurate resection of specimens from the rectum under binocular vision. This review examines its role in the treatment of benign conditions of the rectum and the evidence to support its use and compliment existing endoscopic treatments. The evolution of TEMS in early rectal cancer and the concepts and outcomes of how it has been utilised to treat patients so far are presented. The bespoke nature of early rectal cancer treatment is changing the standard algorithms of rectal cancer care. The future of TEMS in the organ preserving treatment of early rectal cancer is discussed and how as clinicians we are able to select the correct patients for neoadjuvant or radical treatments accurately. The role of radiotherapy and outcomes from combination treatment using TEMS are presented with suggestions for areas of future research.

Learning curve for transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was first published by the late Professor Buess in 1983. The procedure initially had a slow acceptance due to its perceived difficulty, the cost of the equipment, and limited indications. However, the widespread adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery provided an impetus to increase the penetration of the platform. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the TEM learning curve (LC).

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, all patients who underwent TEM, from November 2005 to October 2008 were identified from a prospective database. The operations were performed by a single, board-certified colorectal surgeon (DRS), after learning the technique from Professor Buess. Patient, operative, and postoperative variables were obtained by retrospective chart review. Rates of excision in minutes per cm(2) of tissue were calculated. The CUSUM method was used to plot the LC. Variables were compared using χ (2) and Student's t test. A p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients underwent TEM (median age 61 years, 69.5 % male). Mean operative time was 130.5 (range 39-254) min, and the mean specimen size was 16.6 (7.4-42) cm(2). Average rate of excision (ARE) was 8.9 min/cm(2). A stabilization of the LC was observed after the first four cases, showing an ARE of 13.8 min/cm(2) for the first four cases versus 7.9 min/cm(2) for the last 19 cases (p = 0.001). An additional rising and leveling of the LC was observed after the first 10 cases, when an increasing number of lesions located cephalad to 8 cm from the dentate line were being resected (lesions above 8 cm in the first 10 cases: 20 % vs. last 13 cases: 61 %; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The ARE significantly declined after the first four cases. The LC for TEM is associated with a significant decrease in operative time after four cases.

Robotic transanal endoscopic microsurgery: technical details for the lateral approach

BACKGROUND

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a minimally invasive approach reserved for the resection of selected rectal tumors. However, this approach is technically demanding. Although robotic technology may overcome the limitations of this approach, the system can be difficult to dock, especially in the lithotomy position.

OBJECTIVE

The study aim is thus to report the technical details of robotic transanal endoscopic microsurgery with the use of a lateral approach.

DESIGN AND SETTINGS

This study is a prospective evaluation of robotic transanal endoscopic microsurgery in a single tertiary institution, under a protocol approved by our local ethics committee.

INTERVENTION

Patients underwent a routine mechanical bowel preparation and were placed in the left or right lateral position according to the tumor location. A circular anal dilatator was used together with the glove port technique. The robotic system was then docked over the hip. A 30° optic and 2 articulated instruments were used with an additional assistant trocar. The tumor excision was realized with an atraumatic grasper and an articulated cautery hook, and the defect was closed with barbed continuous stiches in each case.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome was the safety and feasibility of the procedure.

RESULTS

Three patients underwent a robotic transanal endoscopic microsurgery with the use of the lateral approach. Mean operative time was 110 minutes, including 20 minutes for the docking of the robot. There was 1 intraoperative complication (a pneumoperitoneum without intraabdominal lesion) and no postoperative complications. Mean hospital stay was 3 days. Margins were negative in all the cases.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by the small number of patients.

CONCLUSION

Robotic transanal endoscopic microsurgery with use of the lateral approach is feasible and may facilitate the local resection of small lesions of the mid and lower rectum. It might assume an important place in sphincter-preserving surgery, especially for selected and early rectal cancer (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A114).

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: what indications in 2013?

Thanks to major advances in the field of surgical techniques and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, along with more accurate pre-operative staging tools and the widespread introduction of population-based screening programs, treatment of rectal cancer has been evolving over the past few decades, moving towards a more tailored approach. This has brought a shift in the treatment algorithm of benign rectal lesions and selected early rectal cancers, for which today transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is accepted as an effective alternative to abdominal surgery.

In 2013, topics of controversy are the role of TEM in the treatment of more advanced rectal cancers, in cases of complete pathological response after chemoradiation therapy and the role of TEM as a platform for single-port surgery and NOTES. This article reviews the current indications for TEM and the future perspectives of this approach in the treatment of rectal tumors.

Transanal glove port is a safe and cost-effective alternative for transanal endoscopic microsurgery

BACKGROUND

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive technique for excision of rectal tumours that avoids conventional pelvic resectional surgery along with its risks and side-effects. Although appealing, the associated cost and complex learning curve limit TEM utilization by colorectal surgeons. Single-port laparoscopic principles are being recognized as transferable to transanal work and hybrid techniques are in evolution. Here the clinical application of a new technique for transanal access is reported.

METHODS

Consecutive non-selected patients eligible for TEM over a 3-month period (and selected patients thereafter) were offered a procedure performed via a 'glove TEM port'. This access device was constructed on-table using a circular anal dilator (CAD), wound retractor and standard surgical glove, along with standard, straight laparoscopic trocar sleeves and instruments.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients underwent full-thickness resection of benign (8) or malignant (6) rectal pathology. CAD insertion failed in one patient and conventional TEM assistance was needed in another, leaving 12 procedures completed successfully by glove TEM alone as planned (completion rate 86 per cent overall, 92 per cent after initiation). The median (range) duration of operation and resected specimen area were 93 (30-120) min and 12 (3-152) cm(2) respectively. There was no intraoperative and minimal postoperative morbidity, with a median follow-up of 5.7 (2.7-9.4) months.

CONCLUSION

The glove TEM port is a safe, inexpensive and readily available access tool that may obviate the use of specialized equipment for transanal resection of rectal lesions.

Transanal endoscopic video-assisted (TEVA) excision

BACKGROUND

Transanal endoscopic video-assisted (TEVA) excision represents an alternative approach for the surgical treatment of middle and upper rectal lesions not amenable to colonoscopic removal. Utilizing principles of single-incision laparoscopic surgery, this novel minimally invasive approach optimizes access for safe and complete removal of these lesions without the need for a formal rectal resection. We describe our technique and early outcomes with TEVA excision.

METHODS

Between March 2010 and September 2011, TEVA excision was performed for patients presenting for management of rectal lesions not amenable to colonoscopic or standard transanal removal. Patients were selected if they presented with benign disease or superficial adenocarcinoma, and the proximal extent of the lesion extended beyond 8 cm from the anal verge. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were assessed. A SILS™ port was placed in the anal canal for access in all cases. Standard laparoscopic instruments were utilized for visualization, full-thickness transanal excision, and primary closure.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (50% male) with a mean age of 64.6 ± 10.9 years, mean body mass index of 28.2 ± 4.9 kg/m(2), and median American Society of Anesthesiologist score of 2 underwent TEVA excision. Fourteen patients (70%) presented with benign disease and six patients (30%) presented with malignant disease. The mean size of the lesions was 3.0 ± 1.4 cm, and the mean distance from the anal verge was 10.6 ± 2.4 cm. All excisions were successfully completed with a mean operative time of 79.8 ± 25.1 (range, 45-135) min. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.1 ± 0.7 (range, 0-3) days.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVA excision is a safe and feasible approach for local excision of rectal lesions not otherwise amenable to standard techniques. Continued investigation and development will be important to establish its role in minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

Does peritoneal perforation affect short- and long-term outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery?

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal perforation (PP) is frequently reported as a complication of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Nevertheless, these concerns have only rarely been addressed in the literature, with no mention of the long-term oncologic consequences of PP.

METHODS

A prospective database was analyzed with the intent to evaluate the influence of PP on the short- and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing TEM.

RESULTS

Peritoneal perforation occurred in 28 (5.8%) of 481 patients who underwent TEM for a rectal neoplasm. The conversion rate to abdominal surgery was 10.7% (3/28). All the conversions occurred during the first 100 TEM procedures (3/100 vs 0/381; p = 0.007). The postoperative morbidity rate was 3.6% (1/28), and the 30-day mortality was nil. Compared with the group of patients who had no peritoneal perforation, the PP group showed a significantly longer operating time (120 vs 60 min; p < 0.001) and a significantly longer hospital stay (6 vs 4 days; p = 0.003). Nevertheless, the global morbidity rate and the type of complications according to Dindo's classification were similar. In the multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of PP was tumor distance from the anal verge (p = 0.010). During a median follow-up period of 48 months (range, 12-150 months), no liver or peritoneal metastases were detected in 13 patients with rectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal perforation does not seem to affect short-term or oncologic outcomes for patients submitted to TEM with full-thickness resection for upper rectum neoplasms. The use of TEM to resect rectal lesions involving the intraperitoneal rectum may therefore represent an intermediate step toward the development of transrectal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques.

Preclinical cadaveric study of transanal endoscopic da Vinci® surgery

BACKGROUND

Single-port platforms are increasingly being used for transanal surgery and may be associated with a shorter learning curve than transanal endoscopic microsurgery. However, these procedures remain technically challenging, and robotic technology could overcome some of the limitations and increase intraluminal manoeuvrability. An initial experimental experience with transanal endoscopic da Vinci(®) surgery (TEdS) using a glove port on human cadavers is reported.

METHODS

After initial dry laboratory experiments, the feasibility of TEdS and ideal set-up were further evaluated in human cadavers. For transanal access a glove port was constructed on-table by using a circular anal dilator, a standard wound retractor and a surgical glove. A da Vinci(®) Si HD system was used in combination with the glove port for transanal endoscopic resections.

RESULTS

It was possible to perform all necessary tasks to complete a full-thickness excision and closure of the rectal wall, with cadavers in both prone and supine positions. The stable magnified view, combined with the EndoWrist(®) technology of the robotic instruments, made every task straightforward. Intraluminal manoeuvrability could be improved further by intersecting the robotic instruments. The glove port proved to be very reliable and the inherent flexibility of the glove facilitated docking of the robotic arms in a narrow confined space.

CONCLUSION

Using a reliable and universally available glove port, TEdS was feasible and a preferred set-up was determined. Further clinical trials will be necessary to assess the safety and efficacy of this technique.

Laparoscopic-monitored colonoscopic polypectomy: a multimodality method to avoid segmental colon resection

AIM

In some patients with adenoma, snare polypectomy may be technically impossible owing to angulation of the colon or after previous surgery. This may result in a segmental colonic resection, if malignant invasion is thought to be likely. Laparoscopic mobilization of the colon to enable a simultaneous colonoscopy can avoid this difficulty.

METHOD

A feasibility study was performed in 11 patients for whom endoscopic removal was technically impossible due to fibrosis after previous surgery or to anatomical difficulty. In 10, adenoma (histologically benign) had been diagnosed during diagnostic colonoscopy and in the remaining patient the indication was rectal bleeding.

RESULTS

It was possible to perform a full colonoscopy after laparoscopic mobilization in all cases. In nine of the 10 patients with adenoma 11 tubulovillous adenomas were removed endoscopically, and in one the tumour was too large for endoscopic resection even after full mobilization. A laparoscopic segmental resection was performed in this case. In the patient with rectal bleeding, colonoscopy revealed an angiodysplasia of the caecum, also treated by resection. Apart from the two patients having resection, all patients were discharged within 24 h of the procedure. During endoscopic follow up (4-27 months) there were no recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined laparoscopy and endoscopy enabled removal of adenomas otherwise inaccessible for endoscopic techniques. Thus, segmental colon resections can be avoided in most of these patients.

Two-point fixed endoscopic submucosal dissection in rectal tumor (with video)

BACKGROUND

Polypectomy, EMR, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, and surgery have been performed as treatments of rectal tumors. Endoscopic procedures are the least-invasive treatments for patients. Complete resection of the lesion is required to prevent its recurrence, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has begun to be performed. With increasing requirements for safety, reliability, and simplicity in ESD, we decided to use a 2-point fixed ESD with a transparent hood fitted with a mucosal forceps channel in a case of a rectal tumor and report its usefulness.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety, simplicity, and usefulness of 2-point fixed ESD performed on a rectal tumor.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Safety, simplicity, and usefulness of 2-point fixed ESD performed on a rectal tumor.

RESULTS

The mean duration of the procedure was 45 minutes (range 30-110 minutes). Hemostasis and manipulation of the vessels were easy in all patients who did not have postoperative bleeding, perforation, or retroperitoneal emphysema as complications.

LIMITATIONS

Uncontrolled study.

CONCLUSION

This study of 2-point ESD performed in 12 patients with rectal lesions revealed that the 2-point ESD with a transparent hood fitted with a mucosal forceps channel is a useful auxiliary device, enabling safe and reliable ESD on a rectal lesion.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas

AIM

Comparison of transanal excision (TE) and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) of rectal adenomas (RA) has rarely been performed.

METHOD

From 1990 to 2007, the results of TE (43 RA) and TEM (216 RA) were compared. Rectal adenomas were matched for diameter and distance from the anal verge.

RESULTS

Operation time was 47.5 min for TE and 35 min for TEM (P < 0.001). Morbidity was 10% after TE and 5.3% after TEM (P < 0.001). Negative resection margins were observed in 50% after TE and 88% after TEM (P < 0.001). Fragmentation of the excised specimen was observed in 23.8% after TE and 1.4% after TEM (P < 0.001). In cases of fragmentation, positive resection margins were observed more frequently. Recurrence was 28.7% after TE and 6.1% after TEM (P < 0.001). After TE, RA with a negative resection margin had a local recurrence rate of 0%, compared with 59.6% with a positive margin (P < 0.001), and after TEM these rates were 3.2 and 7.7% (P = 0.3), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of RA.

Initial experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery: the need for understanding the limitations

INTRODUCTION

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is an alternative to transanal excision or radical surgery for benign and carefully selected malignant rectal tumors. Advantages over transanal excision include better visualization, access to more proximal lesions, higher likelihood of negative margins, and lower recurrence rates. Compared to radical resection, patients experience lower rates of morbidity and mortality but may have higher rates of local recurrence.

METHODS

A review of a prospectively maintained database of patients scheduled for transanal endoscopic microsurgery was performed.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients underwent 96 procedures for 13 carcinoid tumors, 1 submucosal mass, 46 adenomas, 12 in situ adenocarcinomas, and 21 invasive adenocarcinomas. Of these cases, 81.2% was successfully completed. There were nine complications (11.5%). Final pathology demonstrated 33 in situ and invasive adenocarcinomas. The mean follow-up was 25.9 months. The four recurrences (12.1%) occurred in: one tubulovillous adenoma, two in situ carcinomas, and one T2 lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is appropriate for benign lesions such as carcinoid tumors and adenomas and can also be curative in carefully selected patients with early-stage invasive rectal cancer. In cases of invasive adenocarcinoma, it should be reserved for low-risk cancers in patients who accept the possible increased risk of recurrence.

New developments in colorectal surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

New developments in colorectal surgery have been driven primarily by technical innovations, which in turn are responsible for changes in practice. This review examines recent publications that describe and have contributed to these changes.

RECENT FINDINGS

We identified and reviewed recent publications in the areas of fecal incontinence, constipation, single incision and robotic surgical techniques, complex anal fistulas, diverticulitis, local excision techniques for rectal neoplasms, surgical care improvement, use of mechanical bowel preparation, and magnetic resonance imaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

SUMMARY

New technologies and practice innovations will enhance patient outcomes and quality of life. Multiinstitutional studies, randomized when practical, will be necessary to further define the safety and efficacy of these new surgical techniques and to further define best practices in colon and rectal surgery.

Laparoscopic resection for colorectal polyps: a single institution experience

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic polypectomy, although routinely used for the treatment of colorectal polyps, may be limited by polyp size, location and histology. Laparoscopic resection for malignant polyps and polyps not amenable to endoscopic removal has the advantage of adequate disease clearance as well as the short-term benefits of laparoscopic surgery. This study evaluates the outcomes of such an approach.

METHODS

Patients who had laparoscopic resection for colorectal polyps between January 2005 and July 2008 were identified from a prospective database. Polyps that were malignant, large, difficult to snare or incompletely excised, were included. Demographics, perioperative details and histopathology were analysed.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients (44 male) with a median age of 62.5 years (range 24-86) were studied. The majority (79%) were laparoscopic anterior resections for sigmoid or rectal polyps. Median operating time was 125 min (range, 65-225). Eight cases (10.3%) were converted to open mainly due to adhesions. There was no post-operative mortality. Perioperative complications occurred in seven patients (8.9%). Median hospital stay was 6 days (range 4-78). Median polyp size was 20 mm (range, 5-75). There were 44 benign polyps (55.7%); majority were tubulovillous adenomas (n= 22), and tubular adenomas (n= 10). Thirty-five patients (44.3%) had invasive cancer, with T1 (n= 27) and T2 (n= 2) tumours. Three of these patients (8.6%) had lymph node metastases. Median number of lymph nodes sampled was six (range 0-23).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic resection is safe and effective for colorectal polyps not amenable to colonoscopic removal, and is especially important for adequate clearance in the case of malignant polyps.

Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward

BACKGROUND

Our novel approach is a hybrid between transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and single-port laparoscopy that we have termed TransAnal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS). We report the clinical application of this technique and present preliminary data that show TAMIS to be an effective tool for resection of both malignant and benign lesions of the rectum.

METHODS

Over a 3-month period (May-July 2009) all patients with rectal lesions who were candidates for conventional transanal excision were offered the option to undergo TAMIS resection. Patients with biopsy-proven malignant lesions were required to undergo endorectal ultrasound preoperatively to determine tumor stage. To perform TAMIS, a single-incision laparoscopic surgery port (SILS Port, Covidien) is introduced into the anal canal by applying steady manual pressure. Once seated in position, endoscopic access to the rectal vault is gained and pneumorectum is established. With this access, ordinary laparoscopic instruments, including graspers, thermal energy devices, and needle drives, are used to perform the transanal excisions.

RESULTS

Six patients, aged 43-85 years old (mean = 59.8), underwent TAMIS resection of rectal lesions. The average distance from the anal verge was 9.3 cm and the mean tumor diameter confirmed by pathology measured 2.93 cm. There were no conversions from TAMIS to conventional transanal excision. While the average operating time was 86 min, four of the six TAMIS resections (67%) were completed in less than 1 h. The mean set-up time was only 1.9 min and this may be one reason that the mean operative time was considerably less than the average operative time for TEM surgery (120-140 min). In short-term follow-up, there was no morbidity or mortality observed.

CONCLUSIONS

TAMIS is a feasible alternative to TEM, providing its benefits at a fraction of the cost.