Laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic sigmoidopexy: a new surgical option for sigmoid volvulus

Comparison of the ability of resection versus nonresection surgery to prevent the recurrence of sigmoid volvulus: A protocol of a meta-analysis and systematic review

PURPOSE

Based on clinical research guidelines and clinical practice, patients with sigmoid volvulus (SV) who receive conservative treatment have a greater recurrence rate than patients who do not receive conservative treatment, which is almost without any controversy. Surgical treatment is usually the final treatment for patients with SV. However, there are multiple surgical methods for the treatment of SV, which can be roughly divided into resection and nonresection methods. The available evidence on the effectiveness of surgery for preventing postoperative recurrence is still inadequate. Therefore, we drafted this systematic review protocol with meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of these two major types of surgery on preventing the recurrence of SV.

METHODS

We comprehensively and systematically reviewed the PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases of articles on SV from inception to November 16, 2023. Two independent authors will screen and analyze the detected literature, and disputes will be resolved through communication with a third experienced person. After evaluating the quality of the literature and estimating the risk of bias, we calculate the pooled effect size and 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity is analyzed by subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis can be carried out to assure the reliability of the results. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) will be used to evaluate the strength of the evidence. The results of each analysis will be recorded in detail. The whole process was carried out in strict accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines (PRISMA-P).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Protocol registration: The study protocol has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews platform (PROSPERO) (CRD42024508350). Protocol version 1.0, 13 Feb 2024.

Endoscopic management of acute sigmoid volvulus in high risk surgical elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Most patients with sigmoid volvulus are of old age with multiple comorbidities. So, the risk of surgery for those elderly patients is usually associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. Early intervention is required for managing sigmoid volvulus to avoid its serious complications; therefore, early endoscopic untwist of sigmoid colon can be performed followed by endoscopic fixation of sigmoid colon under sedation in this category of the patients to avoid development of high risk surgical complications following surgical fixation of sigmoid colon or sigmoidectomy after initial simple loop colostomy procedure to relieve obstruction.

METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial included all patients who developed acute sigmoid volvulus and were referred to the Zagazig University Hospital Emergency Department between December 2020 and August 2022. The study was prospectively approved by Zagazig University Faculty of Medicine Institutional Review Board (Approval Number: 9989/23-10-2022) and was retrospectively submitted in http://clinicaltrials.gov in November 2022 ( http://clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05620446). Included eligible patients were simply randomized at a 1:1 ratio to "Endoscopic Group (EG)" or "Surgical Group (SG)" via drawing of sealed envelopes containing computer-generated random numbers prepared by a third party before start of intervention.

RESULTS

Sample size included 18 patients divided into 2 equal groups. (1) Endoscopic group included 9 patients who were subjected to endoscopic untwist of sigmoid colon followed by endoscopic fixation of sigmoid colon under sedation; (2) Surgical group included 9 patients who were subjected to surgical fixation of sigmoid colon or sigmoidectomy after initial simple loop colostomy under general anesthesia. In comparison between both groups, there were statistically significant differences regarding length of hospital stay and procedure time. Unfortunately, there were no statistically significant differences regarding postoperative complications and co-morbidities. Eight patients in the endoscopy group demonstrated excellent quality of life, and one demonstrated good quality of life; unlike the surgical group, there were 3 patients with excellent quality of life, 5 patients with good quality of life, and 1 patient with poor quality of life. So there was statistically significant difference regarding quality of life between both groups. During the 9-month follow-up period, both groups demonstrated no cases of recurrence post-fixation.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic management of acute sigmoid volvulus is effective and safe in elderly high risk surgical patients (either in managing the intestinal obstruction caused by volvulus or in definitive treatment of volvulus).

WSES consensus guidelines on sigmoid volvulus management

Sigmoid volvulus is a common surgical emergency, especially in elderly patients. Patients can present with a wide range of clinical states: from asymptomatic, to frank peritonitis secondary to colonic perforation. These patients generally need urgent treatment, be it endoscopic decompression of the colon or an upfront colectomy. The World Society of Emergency Surgery united a worldwide group of international experts to review the current evidence and propose a consensus guidelines on the management of sigmoid volvulus.

Laparoscopic fixation of volvulus by extra-peritonealization: a case series

BACKGROUND

Volvulus is one of the leading causes of colonic obstruction with a high recurrence rate following endoscopic decompression. Although colonic resection remains the treatment of choice, it is often associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in elderly patients. Colonic fixation with extra-peritonealization has been suggested as an alternative to colonic resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of patients with colonic volvulus in our initial experience with this procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent colonic extra-peritonealization for volvulus between January 2016 and April 2021 in Sheba medical center (Ramat-Gan, Israel) was performed. Patients' demographics, clinical, peri-operative and post-operative data were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty nine patients were admitted due to acute colonic volvulus, 48 of whom were treated surgically. Eleven patients underwent extra-peritonealization of the sigmiod or cecum during the study period. Mean age was 64.5 years. Six patients (54.55%) were males. Seven patients (63.63%) presented with sigmoid volvulus and 4 (36.36%) with cecal volvulus. Median American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class was 3 (range 2-4). One patient (9.09%) was required urgent surgery. The majority of patients was operated on using a laparoscopic approach (10 patients, 90.9%). Median length of stay was 3 days (range 1-6 days) and no post-operative complications or readmissions within 30 days after surgery were recorded. Median length of follow-up was 283 days (range 21-777 days). During the follow-up period, three patients (27.27%) presented with recurrent volvulus and required an additional surgical intervention with colonic resection. Of the patients with volvulus recurrence, one patient (9.09%) required an urgent surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Extra-peritonealization of colonic volvulus is feasible and safe. Although recurrence rates are fairly high, the low morbidity associated with the procedure makes it an appealing alternative to colonic resection, especially in patients with high risk for post-operative complications.

Sigmoidectomy following sigmoid volvulus: who is at risk of anastomotic failure?

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak following elective sigmoidectomy performed due to sigmoid volvulus (SV) is a devastating complication. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence and risk factors associated with leak in this specific group of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed at two university-affiliated tertiary centres in Israel. All consecutive patients between January 2014 and April 2020 treated for SV with elective sigmoidectomy and primary anastomosis were reviewed and those suffering from anastomotic leak identified. Factors associated with this complication were assessed using univariate analysis and odds ratios subsequently calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 99 patients initially identified, 58 were included in the study group [45 males and 13 females (77.6% versus 22.4% respectively) mean age 67.4 years, range 13-97]. There were 10 anastomotic leaks identified (17.2%). On univariate analysis recurrent decompression (OR 8.28, p = 0.027), age > 80-years (OR 6.88, p = 0.027), open rather than laparoscopic surgery (OR = 5.83, p = 0.005) and ASA grade 3/4 (OR 0.132, p = 0.023) were significantly associated with anastomotic leak. Male sex approached but not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent endoscopic decompression, age > 80 years, open surgery and ASA grade 3/4 are associated with anastomotic leak and these patients should be considered for formation of a colostomy instead. If an anastomosis is performed, patients should be appropriately counselled and monitored in the perioperative period.

Colonoscopy-assisted percutaneous sigmoidopexy: a novel, simple, safe, and efficient treatment for inoperable sigmoid volvulus (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many patients with sigmoid volvulus are old with co-morbidities, making elective surgery prohibitive. Colonoscopic management is often successful but volvulus often recurs. We devised a method of colonoscopy-assisted percutaneous sigmoidopexy as an alternative method to prevent recurrence of sigmoid volvulus. This study aimed to assess its safety and effectiveness.

METHODS

Patients with sigmoid volvulus American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ≥3 or Barthel index <30 were included. We excluded patients with intestinal necrosis and those who were unable to be repositioned but who could undergo intestinal resection. Colonoscopy-assisted sigmoidopexy was performed under radiographic observation. First, a colonoscope was inserted to the fixation site. A site for percutaneous puncture of the colon was identified by transmitted illumination and finger pressure. An exploratory puncture through the abdominal wall was made with a 23-gauge cattelan needle with the patient under local anesthesia, followed by a skin incision. Sigmoid fixation was then performed using a 2-shot anchor device that allows the sigmoid colon to be sutured to the abdominal wall. Fixation was repeated at 5 to 10 sites (average 8.8). The primary outcome measurement was sigmoid volvulus recurrence within 12 months. The secondary outcome measurement was adverse events.

RESULTS

Eight patients received colonoscopy-assisted sigmoidopexy, and no sigmoid volvulus recurred during the 12-month follow-up period. One case of postoperative subcutaneous emphysema was successfully managed with conservative therapy.

CONCLUSION

Colonoscopy-assisted sigmoidopexy was an effective, safe alternative method to prevent the recurrence of sigmoid volvulus.

Retrospective study on pattern and outcome of management of sigmoid volvulus at district hospital in Ethiopia

Background

Sigmoid volvulus is the commonest cause of large bowel obstruction in many regions of the world. Its prevalence varies greatly geographically. In Ethiopia, the disease is the commonest cause of emergency admissions due to intestinal obstruction. However, few studies have been conducted discussing the management outcome in Ethiopia and Africa. This research was conducted to assess the pattern & management outcome of acute sigmoid volvulus at a district hospital in South-west Ethiopia.

Methods

A facility based retrospective cross-sectional review of surgical records was done to identify patients who had acute sigmoid volvulus. Data was collected using structured questionnaire by three pre trained data collectors. The collected data was checked for its completeness, and then entered, edited, cleaned and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0. For all statistical significance tests the cut-off value set was P < 0.05.

Result

A total of 131 patients were managed for acute sigmoid volvulus. 108 (82.4%) were men with a male to female ratio of 4.7:1. The hospital prevalence of acute sigmoid volvulus was 27.9%. Majority (42%) of the patients were in the 6th decades of life. Abdominal pain, abdominal distention & inability to pass feces & flatus were the predominant presenting compliant while abdominal distention was the dominant physical finding in all of the patients. Ninety-seven patients (74%) had viable bowel obstruction of which 29 patients had successful rectal tube deflation. The remaining 68 patients were managed operatively by either primary resection & anastomosis (62 patients) or derotation alone (6 patients). Thirty-four patients had gangrenous bowel obstruction and were managed by either primary resection and anastomosis (16 patients) or Hartman’s colostomy (18 patients). Six patients died of which 5 had primary resection and anastomosis (2 for viable and 3 for gangrenous bowel obstruction).The predominant postoperative complication was wound infection in 11(10.7%) patients. Factors associated with unfavorable outcome were female sex, primary resection & end to end anastomosis and presentation of illness more than 24 h.

Conclusion

The most common management was primary resection and anastomosis. The overall mortality rate was 4.5% and the mortality rate related to primary resection and end to end anastomosis was 6.4%. Mortality rate was higher in those patients who had resection and anastomosis for gangrenous bowel compared to those who had viable bowel (19% vs 3%). Generally factors associated with poor outcome were duration of illness, primary resection and anastomosis and being female.

Outcomes of first-line endoscopic management for patients with sigmoid volvulus

BACKGROUND

Sigmoid volvulus is a common cause of colonic obstruction in old and frail patients. Its standard management includes the endoscopic detorsion of the colonic loop, followed by an elective sigmoidectomy to prevent recurrence. However, these patients are often poor candidates for surgery.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare death rate between elective sigmoidectomy and conservative management following endoscopic detorsion for sigmoid volvulus.

METHODS

The medical records of 83 patients undergoing endoscopic detorsion of a sigmoid volvulus from 2008 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: 'elective surgery' and 'no surgery'.

RESULTS

Patients in the 'no surgery' group (n = 42) were older and had more loss of autonomy than in the 'elective surgery' group. Volvulus endoscopic detorsion was successful in 96% of patients with no complications. The median follow-up was 13 months (1 day-67 months). The death rate was 62% in the 'no surgery' group versus 32% in the 'elective surgery' group (p = 0.02). In the 'no surgery' group, 23/42 of patients had volvulus recurrence. No recurrence occurred after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Elective surgery must be planned as soon as possible after the first episode of sigmoid volvulus. In frail patients, other options must be developed.

Percutaneous endoscopic sigmoidopexy using T-fasteners for management of sigmoid volvulus

BACKGROUND

Sigmoid volvulus (SV) is the third leading cause of large bowel obstruction after colonic neoplasms and diverticular disease. SV has traditionally been managed via endoscopic detorsion and decompression followed by non-emergent surgical resection owing to the high risk of recurrence. Most cases of SV occur in elderly debilitated patients with multiple comorbidities and may not be candidates for surgical resection. Endoscopic sigmoidopexy has been described as an alternative to surgical resection. Here, we describe our experience with endoscopic sigmoidopexy using T-fasteners.

METHODS

Three patients with recurrent SV that were identified as poor surgical candidates by our colorectal surgery team underwent endoscopic sigmoidopexy. The patients received preoperative bowel preparation. A colonoscope was inserted and the site of the volvulus was visualized and assessed for adequate decompression. Subsequently, four points of fixation were identified and T-fasteners were deployed.

RESULTS

Two patients underwent successful sigmoidopexy without any complications or recurrence on follow-up. One patient developed post procedure pneumoperitoneum that was successfully treated conservatively; however, he passed away from their underlying comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

Overall, preliminary results for sigmoidopexy using T-fasteners have been promising, offering a potential option to prevent recurrence in high risk patients unsuitable for surgical intervention.

Management of the colonic volvulus in 2016

Colonic volvulus is the third leading cause of colonic obstruction worldwide, occurring at two principal locations: the sigmoid colon and cecum. In Western countries, sigmoid volvulus preferentially affects elderly men whereas cecal volvulus affects younger women. Some risk factors, such as chronic constipation, high-fiber diet, frequent use of laxatives, personal past history of laparotomy and anatomic predispositions, are common to both locations. Clinical symptomatology is non-specific, including a combination of abdominal pain, gaseous distention, and bowel obstruction. Abdominopelvic computerized tomography is currently the gold standard examination, allowing positive diagnosis as well as detection of complications. Specific management depends on the location, patient comorbidities and colonic wall viability, but treatment is an emergency in every case. If clinical or radiological signs of gravity are present, emergency surgery is mandatory, but is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. For sigmoid volvulus without criteria of gravity, the ideal strategy is an endoscopic detorsion procedure followed, within 2 to 5 days, by surgery that includes a sigmoid colectomy with primary anastomosis. Exclusively endoscopic therapy must be reserved for patients who are at excessive risk for surgical intervention. In cecal volvulus, endoscopy has no role and surgery is the rule.

Management of acute sigmoid volvulus: short- and long-term results

AIM

The best form of prophylactic management of a decompressed sigmoid volvulus (SV) is controversial especially in the elderly. We have studied our experience with this condition to assess the short- and long-term results of SV management.

METHOD

All patients treated for SV in our department between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively included. Emergency decompression was attempted in all patients in whom there was no sign of peritonitis. Planned surgical resection was the procedure of choice in young patients. Percutaneous endoscopic colopexy (PEC) was used in high surgical risk patients.

RESULTS

There were 65 patients (45 males) of median age 71.5 (24-99) years. Non-surgical reduction was performed in 62 with a success rate of 95% (59/62). Recurrence after initial decompression was 67% at a median follow-up of 5 (1-14) years. A prophylactic surgical resection was performed with primary anastomosis in 33 patients. There were no deaths and the major morbidity rate was 6%. At a mean follow-up of 62 months, only 1 (3%) patient had had a recurrence (at 130 months). PEC was performed in six patients of median age 90 (84-99) years and with a median American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 4. Complications included local site infection (n = 2), pain (n = 1) and abdominal wall bleeding (n = 1). After a median follow-up of 2 (1-4) years, three patients died from medical causes and one recurrence occurred 13 months after removal of the PEC tube.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic treatment after initial decompression of SV results in a low rate of recurrence. Planned sigmoid resection is safe and effective. In frail elderly patients, PEC is satisfactory.

Single-port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid volvulus

AIM

To report our experience with single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) for sigmoid volvulus (SV).

METHODS

Between October 2009 and April 2013, 10 patients underwent SPLS for SV. SPLS was performed transumbilically or through a predetermined stoma site. Conventional straight and rigid-type laparoscopic instruments were used. After intracorporeal, segmental resection of the affected sigmoid colon, the specimen was extracted through the single-incision site. Patient demographics and perioperative data were analyzed.

RESULTS

SPLS for SV was successful in all 10 patients (4, resection and primary anastomosis; 6, Hartmann's procedure). The median operative time and postoperative hospitalization period were 168 (range, 85-315) min and 6.5 (range, 4-29) d, respectively. No intraoperative complications were noted; there were 2 postoperative complications, including 1 anastomotic leak.

CONCLUSION

SPLS was a safe and feasible therapeutic approach for SV, when performed by a surgeon experienced in conventional laparoscopic surgery.

More patients should undergo surgery after sigmoid volvulus

AIM: To assess the outcome of patients treated conservatively vs surgically during their first admission for sigmoid volvulus.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 61 patients admitted to Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark between 1996 and 2011 for their first incidence of sigmoid volvulus. The condition was diagnosed by radiography, sigmoidoscopy or surgery. Patients treated with surgery underwent either a sigmoid resection or a percutaneous endoscopic colostomy (PEC). Conservatively treated patients were managed without surgery. Data was recorded into a Microsoft Access database and calculations were performed with Microsoft Excel. Kaplan-Meier plotting and Mantel-Cox (log-rank) testing were performed using GraphPad Prism software. Mortality was defined as death within 30 d after intervention or surgery.

RESULTS: Among the total 61 patients, 4 underwent emergency surgery, 55 underwent endoscopy, 1 experienced resolution of the volvulus after contrast enema, and 1 died without treatment because of large bowel perforation. Following emergency treatment, 28 patients underwent sigmoid resection (semi-elective n = 18; elective n = 10). Two patients who were unfit for surgery underwent PEC and both died, 1 after 36 d and the other after 9 mo, respectively. The remaining 26 patients were managed conservatively without sigmoid resection. Patients treated conservatively on their first admission had a poorer survival rate than patients treated surgically on their first admission (95%CI: 3.67-14.37, P = 0.036). Sixty-three percent of the 26 conservatively treated patients had not experienced a recurrence 3 mo after treatment, but that number dropped to 24% 2 years after treatment. Eight of the 14 patients with recurrence after conservative treatment had surgery with no 30-d mortality.

CONCLUSION: Surgically-treated sigmoid volvulus patients had a higher long-term survival rate than conservatively managed patients, indicating a benefit of surgical resection or PEC insertion if feasible.

Treatment of sigmoid volvulus: a single-center experience of 952 patients over 46.5 years

BACKGROUND

Sigmoid volvulus describes the wrapping of the sigmoid colon around itself and its mesentery, causing an intestinal obstruction. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of 952 patients treated for sigmoid volvulus over a period of 46.5 years.

METHODS

Clinical records were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Nonsurgical detorsion was performed in 686 patients with 77.1 % success, 2.5 % morbidity, 0.7 % mortality, and 4.5 % early recurrence rates; emergency surgical procedures were performed in 447 patients with 35.3 % morbidity, 16.1 % mortality, 0.7 % early recurrence, and 7.4 % late recurrence rates, while elective surgical treatment was performed in 104 patients with 12.5 % morbidity, no mortality, and no recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The principal strategy in the treatment for sigmoid volvulus is early nonsurgical detorsion followed by elective surgery in uncomplicated patients, while emergency surgical treatment is performed for patients with bowel gangrene, perforation, or peritonitis, other difficulties with diagnosis, unsuccessful nonsurgical detorsion, and early recurrence.

Article Commentary: The Twisted Colon: A Review of Sigmoid Volvulus

Sigmoid volvulus (SV) is the third leading cause of colon obstruction in adults. In infants and children, it is exceedingly rare with only sporadic cases reported so far. SVs from secondary causes, with congenital megacolon being the most important, are nevertheless more common in young people. The etiology of this disorder is not completely understood. It is known to occur in the setting of redundant sigmoid loop, which rotates around its narrow and elongated mesentery. Although the latter occurs in the setting of constipation, a congenitally elongated colon, and other predisposing factors, there is no consensus on the precipitating factor leading to SV formation. The symptoms are suggestive of small bowel obstruction, but the presentations can be acute or indolent. Plain abdominal radiography is used to diagnose SV in most cases with computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging as the confirmatory tests when necessary. After it has been untwisted, the definitive and standard therapy for SV is sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis. The nonresective alternatives have also been widely used with mixed success, but a large, randomized controlled trial is needed to compare their efficacy with resection and primary anastomosis. Laparoscopic surgery in SV management is unwarranted and costly. Complications of SV include hemorrhagic infarction, perforation, septic shock, and death. The mortality data from SV vary, but the latest literature cites an overall range of 14 to 45 per cent.