Documentation of Blunt Trauma in Europe Survey of the Current Status of Documentation and Appraisal of the Value of Standardization

Survey on structural preparedness for treatment of thoracic and abdominal trauma in German-speaking level 1 trauma centers

INTRODUCTION

Increasing sub-specialization has reduced the number of general surgeons involved in the care of trauma patients in German-speaking countries (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) over the past decades. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess, to what extent level 1 trauma centers are still prepared to provide immediate emergency surgery in patients with thoracic or abdominal trauma.

METHODS

Web-based and paper questionnaires were sent to all level 1 trauma centers participating in the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland from Feb 2017 to Sep 2017. The centers were asked about the presence or availability of surgeons who were able to perform an emergency laparotomy or thoracotomy.

RESULTS

Of all 117 level 1 trauma centers participating in the TR-DGU in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, 97 (83%) gave a response. A board-certified surgeon who is able to perform an emergency laparotomy is present 24 h/7 days a week in 72% of the centers (emergency thoracotomy: 57%). In centers where no such surgeon was present the whole time, the mean maximum time of arrival of the surgeon on call was 18.9 min (SD 7.0, range 10-40 min) regarding the ability to perform an emergency laparotomy and 19.9 min (SD 7.0, range 10-40 min) regarding the emergency thoracotomy.

CONCLUSION

The majority of level 1 trauma centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria in the TR-DGU seem to be well prepared to treat severe injuries of the abdominal and thoracic cavities. In some centers, however, a surgeon able to perform an emergency laparotomy or thoracotomy is not available within 30 min.

Physical, psychological and economic burden of two-wheel users after a road traffic injury: Evidence from intensive care units of three EU countries

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to assess the physical, psychological, and economic burden shouldered by severely injured two-wheel users in three European countries as well as the cost resulting from their hospitalization.

METHODS

A total of seven public hospitals were involved in three countries: Greece, Italy, and Germany. Participants enrolled during a 12-month period starting in April 2013. Eligibility criteria included an injury sustained at Road Traffic Crashes (RTC) irrespective of the type of vehicle, hospitalization 1 day in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or sub-ICU, and age 18 years or over. Patients were interviewed at 1, 6, and 12 months upon admission. The study used widely recommended classifications for injury severity (Abbreviated Injury Severity [AIS]; Maximum Abbreviated Injury Severity [MAIS]) and standardized measures such as the Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS 2.0), "Impact of Event Scale" (IES-R), Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D Scale). Health Care Expenditure was assessed through the Monash University Accident Research Centre (MUARC's) framework, which included measures of 'Direct' and 'Indirect' costs. Diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) were used to estimate hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

A total of 54 two-wheel users enrolled in the study in all the countries and 32 completed all follow-up questionnaires. Physical disability increased over 12 months following the injury. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms of avoidance remained at high levels over the study period. PTSD symptoms of intrusion improved significantly during the second half of the year under investigation. The total annual cost of injury for the two-wheel users who were hospitalized in the selected ICU of all the partner countries for severe injury in 2013/2014, was estimated at €714,491 made up of €123,457 direct and €591,034 indirect costs. Men, aged 50-64 years and those who sustained slight injuries primarily at the lower extremities presented higher indirect costs per person. A total of €1032.092 was spent on hospitalization payments. Women, aged 65+ and those who sustained severe injuries at the central body region presented higher direct costs per person. Women, aged 50-64 years, those with severe injuries and a major injury at the central body and the upper body region presented the highest hospitalization costs per person.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for effective strategies to early detect and treat groups at risk of being confronted with prolonged psychosocial and economic consequences.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

A holistic understanding of the impact of injury on individuals is important in order to achieve effective treatment of psychological co-morbidities in a timely manner.

Strategies to Improve Information Transfer for Multitrauma Patients

The aim of this multiphase mixed-method study was to improve access, flow, and consistency of information transfer for multitrauma patients leaving the Emergency Department. Methods included literature review, focus group interviews, chart audits, staff surveys, and a review of international trauma forms to inform an intervention developed with a researcher-led, clinician stakeholder group. Analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics. Baseline data revealed variability existed in patient-care documentation, showing little standardization. Improvement strategies implemented included a gold standard for information embedded in handover tools, raising staff awareness of complexities for information transfer. Improvement was seen in communication between wards coordinating transfer, improved documentation, decreased information duplication, improved legibility, and increased ease and efficiency in navigating to key information. Improvement in communication at patient transition is essential to continuity of safe, effective care, and is impacted by complex interactions between multiple factors. Difficulty increases for patients with high acuity.

Hospitalization costs and estimates of direct and indirect economic losses due to injury sustained in road traffic crashes: Results from a one-year cohort study in three European countries (The REHABILAID project)

Introduction

The financial cost of injuries sustained in road traffic crashes is high for victims, families and national budgets, but there is limited information on the cost of injury from the victims’ perspective, especially in terms of the hard-to-reach multi-trauma patient population such as those admitted to the intensive care units of hospitals.

Materials and methods

The current study received funding by the European Commission Directorate-General Mobility and Transport. It is a prospective, prevalence-based, cost-of-illness study. Participants admitted in the intensive care units of seven public hospitals in Greece, Germany and Italy because of injuries from road traffic crashes, during one year, were enrolled in the study. Patients were followed-up for one year after the intensive care unit admission to report emerging direct and indirect costs related to their injury.

Results

A total of 120 people were enrolled. Males, those aged 25–49, motorcyclists and those severely injured (Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS) 3+) with highest severity located at the central part of the body, accounted for the highest percentages of both the direct and indirect injury costs. The highest average direct costs were for females, those aged 50–64, pedestrians and those slightly injured (MAIS 1 or 2) with highest severity at the central region of the body. Males, patients aged 25–49, car passengers and truck drivers as well as those slightly injured (MAIS 1 or 2) with highest severity at multiple locations were over-represented in the average indirect costs.

Conclusions

Those groups that account for a high percentage of injury costs should be targeted in health policy initiatives.

Pre-hospital trauma care: A comparison of two healthcare systems

INTRODUCTION

The management of trauma patients differs depending upon the healthcare system available.

AIM

To compare the pre-hospital management and outcome of polytrauma patients between two countries with differing approaches to pre-hospital management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Scottish trauma and audit group (STAG) and the German trauma registry (GTR) databases were used to compare the management and outcome of trauma patients in Scotland and Germany. Severely injured patients (injury severity score (ISS) > 16) were analyzed for a 3 year period (2000 to 2002). Patient demographics, pre-hospital interventions, ISS, revised trauma score (RTS), time from scene of injury to arrival to the emergency department (ED), 120 day mortality and standardized mortality ratios using TRISS methodology were compared.

RESULTS

There were 227 patients identified from the STAG registry and 6878 patients from the GTR registry. There was a significant difference in ISS (24.9 vs. 29.8, P = 0.001, respectively). No significant difference was observed for the RTS (P = 0.2). There was a significantly higher rate of pre-hospital interventions in the German group (P < 0.001). The mean time from an injury to arrival to the ED (73 vs. 247 minutes, P = 0.001) was longer for the Scottish patients. There was no difference for an unadjusted mortality rate between the groups, but the standardized mortality ratio was significantly greater for the Scottish population (3.8 vs. 2.2, P = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Despite variation in pre-hospital transfer times and interventions, no significant difference was demonstrated in RTS upon arrival, or for the unadjusted mortality rates.

The medical world is flat too

BACKGROUND

Tom Friedman, in his book,"The World is Flat," makes a very persuasive argument that our current economic policy transcends national boundaries. Friedman describes various processes that prove his point. These include workflow software, open sourcing, outsourcing, off-shoring, supply chaining, in-sourcing, and informing. The United States already outsources surgery. In this article, I give the retail surgical rates and discount rates of the US, and compare them to that of the same surgery in India, Thailand, and Singapore. Supply chaining is another example that applies to the field of medicine, particularly pharmaceuticals. Most pharmaceutical firms are located in developed countries, but 80% of the pharmaceuticals are manufactured in developing countries. A phenomenon that may be unique to the United States is that we off-shore some of our diagnostic capabilities, primarily during out nighttime hours. Under the rubric of "Nighthawk," X-rays, including CT scans, are digitized and sent to Australia, Spain, and other countries during our nighttime hours. A diagnosis is made and sent back to the referring hospital in the US, usually within 30 minutes. I think an argument can be made that almost all of the issues that Friedman talks about in his book, apply to the field of medicine. Trauma care is a microcosm of medicine and uses most of the resources shared by other specialties. The trauma patient has to be identified and ambulances called, usually by 911 or similar numeric systems in other countries. The patient is transported to an emergency room, and if the injury is severe, admitted for acute care, which often requires surgery, intensive care, and ward care. When possible, the patient is discharged home, but is often sent to a rehabilitation facility or a nursing home. To improve trauma care and outcome, surgeons have turned to the organization and system approach that has been so successful in military situations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An extensive review of the surgical and public health papers relating to trauma was carried out. This article is an inventory of how trauma systems are progressing in different countries and whether they are effective. Some of the pitfalls that globalization may bring are also discussed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

For the last 100 years, there has been gradual improvement in care of the civilian patients, as a system approach similar to the military care of injured patients has been introduced and matured. These systems include prehospital care, acute care, rehabilitation; ideally, using a public health approach, preventive components are also utilized. Research is another component that is key in improving patient outcomes.

Cost-Drivers in Acute Treatment of Severe Trauma in Europe: A Systematic Review of Literature

INTRODUCTION

Throughout the world, trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the young and most active group of society. While specialist trauma centers play a critical role in the survival after severe trauma, the assessment of trauma-related costs, budgeting for adequate trauma capacity, and determining the cost-effectiveness of interventions in critical care are fraught with difficulties. Through a systematic review of the European literature on severe trauma, we aimed to identify the key elements that drive the costs of acute trauma care.

METHODS

A PubMed/MEDLINE search for articles relating the costs and economics of trauma was performed for the period January 1995 to July 2007. One hundred and seventy-three European publications were identified. Twelve publications were retrieved for complete review that provided original cost data, a breakdown of costs according to the different elements of trauma care, and focused on severe adult polytrauma. The identified publications presented studies from the UK (3), Germany (6), Italy (2), and Switzerland (1).

RESULTS

In all publications reviewed, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU; 60%) and requirements for surgical interventions (≤ 25%) were the key drivers of hospital costs. The cost of transfusion during the initial rescue therapy can also be substantial, and in fact represented a significant portion of the overall cost of emergency and ICU care. Multiple injuries often require multiple surgical interventions, and prolonged ICU and hospital stay, and across all studies a clear relationship was observed between the severity of polytrauma injuries observed and overall treatment costs. While significant differences existed in the absolute costs of trauma care across countries, the key drivers of costs were remarkably similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of the idiosyncrasies of the national healthcare systems in Europe, severity of injury, length of stay in ICU, surgical interventions and transfusion requirements represent the key drivers of acute trauma care for severe injury.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury in patients with blunt multiple trauma: diagnostic accuracy of duplex Doppler US and early CT angiography

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the frequency of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) in patients with multiple trauma and to retrospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of duplex Doppler ultrasonography (US) and computed tomographic (CT) angiography by using clinical follow-up and subsequent imaging as reference standards.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved this study; informed consent was not required. Charts and images of consecutive patients treated for multiple trauma (injury severity score, >16) between January 1998 and October 2003 were reread by an experienced radiologist. Until October 2002, subjects were screened for BCVI with US. Since November 2002, patients underwent CT angiography of the carotid and vertebral arteries. Sensitivity and specificity of US and CT angiography were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The early cohort included 1471 patients (mean age, 35.8 years +/- 17.7 [standard deviation]), and the late cohort included 407 patients (mean age, 39.2 years +/- 18.8). US depicted five blunt vessel injuries but later missed another eight, which led to cerebral ischemia. With a BCVI frequency of 0.9%, sensitivity and specificity of US were 38.5% (95% CI: 13.9%, 68.4%) and 100% (lower 95% confidence limit, 99.7%), respectively. In the second cohort, the BCVI rate was 2.7%. CT angiography depicted BCVI in 11 patients, with a sensitivity of 100% (lower 95% confidence limit, 71.5%), but produced one false-positive result.

CONCLUSION

Injuries to the cervical arteries among blunt trauma patients are more common than previously reported. Duplex Doppler US has inadequate sensitivity to help rule out this condition. The notable morbidity with missed dissections warrants routine contrast material-enhanced studies of the carotid and vertebral vessels if patients are scheduled for CT of the cervical spine.

Pre-hospital trauma care: a proposal for more efficient evaluation

Although mortality is an important outcome parameter for pre-hospital trauma care, it is influenced by many factors other than pre-hospital trauma care alone. We therefore studied an alternative method to evaluate pre-hospital trauma care by calculating the change in probability of survival (Ps) according to the TRISS methodology, before and directly after the pre-hospital trauma care. Correlations between patient characteristics and a change in Ps were assessed. Further, required sample sizes were calculated for an 80% power to detect a hypothetical 3% reduction in mortality and the corresponding change in Ps. In 140 of 191 patients with an Injury Severity Score > or =16, the Ps did not change. In 36, the Ps increased and in 15 patients, the Ps decreased. Between these three groups, significant differences were found in Revised Trauma Score and age, but no clear differences in Injury Severity Score or mortality. A 3% difference in mortality would require 6800 patients, in contrast to 3500 when the change in Ps was the primary outcome parameter. A change in Ps is a promising outcome parameter for a more efficient evaluation of pre-hospital trauma care. A good collaboration is, however, required between ambulance services and the trauma center for reliable registration.

Consequences of delayed diagnoses in trauma patients: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

The approach to trauma care has improved in recent decades but delayed diagnoses still occur. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and consequences of delayed diagnoses in a single European trauma center. The effect of a systematic reexamination of the patient (tertiary survey) and reevaluation of x-rays and CT scans was evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN

We prospectively registered complications among all trauma patients admitted to our hospital from January 1, 1996, to January 1, 2000. All relevant trauma and patient-related data were added by the physician to a hospital-wide trauma database with client server architecture. Complications including delay in diagnosis were subsequently added to this database. Admitted trauma patients underwent a tertiary survey and all x-rays and CT scans were reevaluated within 24 hours after admission.

RESULTS

A total of 3,879 patients were studied and 1,016 complications were registered. Of all complications 55 concerned delayed diagnoses detected in 49 patients (1.3%). In 28 of these patients (57.1%) the tertiary survey (20 of 49; 40.8%) and reevaluation of x-rays and CT scans (8 of 49; 16.3%) resulted in detection of delayed diagnoses within 24 hours. Detection of the remaining 21 delayed diagnoses occurred after more than 24 hours. Delayed diagnoses resulted in delayed treatment in 27 of the 49 patients (55.1%) and surgery was necessary in 12 patients (24.5%). None of the delayed diagnoses resulted in death.

CONCLUSIONS

A prospective trauma and complication registration enables evaluation of the delays in diagnosis. In our study population more than half of the delayed diagnoses could be detected by a tertiary survey and reevaluation of x-rays and CT scans. Attempts to decrease the number of delayed diagnoses should prevent delays in treatment and improve the quality of trauma care.

Trauma care in Germany

Trauma Care in Germany fulfils all requirements to deal with injured young and mobile individuals as well as with an increasing number of injured elderly patient. Furthermore, it is prepared to cope with mass casualties of injured. As a public task the Trauma System in Germany is well organized and follows clear cut demands. To perform technical and medical therapy at highest available level as soon as possible, a ground system of physician staffed ambulances is supported by a network of physician-staffed HEMS all over Germany. Therefore, enormous efforts in financing, basic research and quality management have been undertaken during recent years to create such a sophisticated rescue system.