1
|
Ghosh B, AL-Busaidi A, Sinha M, Rivero-Moreno Y, Miranda JCDC, Gopaul D, Sarwar S. Unveiling the Enigma: Exploring capsular contracture-Unraveling its link with autoimmune disorders and comprehensive examination of predisposing factors. JPRAS Open 2024; 40:85-94. [PMID: 38444626 PMCID: PMC10914416 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Breast augmentation, a popular cosmetic surgery using devices like silicone implants, can lead to a common issue called capsular contracture (CC). This condition involves the formation of fibrous tissue around the implants and can be influenced by variables like immunological and bacterial factors. This study aimed to explore the impact of autoimmune diseases (ADs) on CC along with other factors influencing future clinical decisions. Methods A systematic review of electronic databases was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and involving adult patients (>18) with CC and ADs after breast surgery using MeSH terminology using a broad search strategy. All searches were performed and analyzed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and duplicates were removed with Rayyan. Two independent investigators extracted and assessed the data involving demographics and baseline data related to CC and AD. Results The incidence of CC varied (2.3%-4.1%). Subglandular placement and older device age raised risk. SERI Surgical Scaffold complications included necrosis, seroma, hematoma, implant loss, and infection; CC was associated with necrosis. Natrelle 410 implants showed lower 10-year CC risk than round gel implants. Acellular dermal matrix implant-based breast reconstruction with radiotherapy (RT) correlated with 20.7% post-RT CC. Previous research demonstrated no significant connection between silicone gel implants and ADs. Biofilm, surgical site infection, implant features, and interventions emerged as frequent CC risk factors. Conclusion Finding appropriate techniques to reduce the risk factors associated with CC together with providing comprehensive patient counseling on these factors will definitely improve the patient-centered outcome of breast implant surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bikona Ghosh
- Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sarosh Sarwar
- Fazaia Medical College, Air University Islamabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suh LJ, Khan I, Kelley-Patteson C, Mohan G, Hassanein AH, Sinha M. Breast Implant-Associated Immunological Disorders. J Immunol Res 2022; 2022:8536149. [PMID: 35571560 PMCID: PMC9095406 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8536149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast implants are commonly placed postbreast cancer reconstruction, cosmetic augmentation, and gender-affirming surgery. Breast implant illness (BII) is a systemic complication associated with breast implants. Patients with BII may experience autoimmune symptoms including fatigue, difficulty concentrating, hair loss, weight change, and depression. BII is poorly understood, and the etiology is unknown. The purpose of this literature review is to characterize BII autoimmune disorders and determine possible causes for its etiology. Methods The PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, and OVID databases were interrogated from 2010 to 2020 using a query strategy including search term combinations of "implants," "breast implant illness," "autoimmune," and "systemic illness." Results BII includes a spectrum of autoimmune symptoms such as fatigue, myalgias/arthralgias, dry eyes/mouth, and rash. A review of epidemiological studies in the past ten years exhibited evidence affirming an association between breast implants and autoimmune diseases. The most commonly recognized were Sjogren's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and Raynaud's syndrome. Explantation resulted in alleviation of symptoms in over 50% of patients, strengthening the hypothesis linking breast implants to BII. Studies have shown that silicone is a biologically inert material and unlikely to be the cause of these symptoms. This is supported by the fact that increased risk of autoimmune disease was also reported in patients with other implantable biomaterials such as orthopedic implants. Recent studies shed light on a possible role of bacterial biofilm and subsequent host-pathogen interactions as a confounding factor to this problem. Conclusion BII could be dependent on biofilm infection and the microenvironment around the implants. The true pathophysiology behind these complaints must be further investigated so that alternative treatment regimens other than explantation can be developed. Translational significance of these studies is not limited to breast implants but extends to other implants as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily J. Suh
- Department of Surgery, Indiana Center for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Imran Khan
- Department of Surgery, Indiana Center for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | | | - Ganesh Mohan
- Department of Surgery, Indiana Center for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Aladdin H. Hassanein
- Department of Surgery, Indiana Center for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Mithun Sinha
- Department of Surgery, Indiana Center for Regenerative Medicine and Engineering, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cohen Tervaert JW, Mohazab N, Redmond D, van Eeden C, Osman M. Breast implant illness: scientific evidence of its existence. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2021; 18:15-29. [PMID: 34882509 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2022.2010546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION More than one million breast augmentation procedures using silicone breast implants (SBI) have been performed worldwide. Adverse events of SBI include local complications such as pain, swelling, redness, infections, capsular contracture, implant rupture and gel-bleed. Furthermore, patients experience systemic symptoms such as chronic fatigue, arthralgias, myalgias, pyrexia, sicca, and cognitive dysfunction. These symptoms received different names such as autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) due to silicone incompatibility syndrome and breast implant illness (BII). Because of chronic immune activation, BII/ASIA, allergies, autoimmune diseases, immune deficiencies and finally lymphomas may develop in SBI patients. AREAS COVERED Causality for SBI-related BII/ASIA is reviewed. To address the role of silicone implants in promoting causality, we utilized the Bradford-Hill criteria, with results highlighted in this article. EXPERT OPINION We conclude that there is a causal association between SBIs and BII/ASIA. Using data derived from patients with BII/ASIA and from other medically implanted devices, there appears to be clear pathogenic relationship between SBI and BII/ASIA. Breast implants cause characteristic systemic reactions in certain women, leading to symptoms of sufficient severity to warrant device removal. The morbidity suffered is variable. SBI removal resolves the symptoms in most women and removal is the most effective treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W Cohen Tervaert
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - N Mohazab
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - D Redmond
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - C van Eeden
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - M Osman
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoa S, Milord K, Hudson M, Nicolaidis SC, Bourré-Tessier J. Risk of rheumatic disease in breast implant users: a qualitative systematic review. Gland Surg 2021; 10:2557-2576. [PMID: 34527567 DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Recent studies on the risk of rheumatic disease among breast implant users have reported conflicting results. The primary objective of this study was to provide a systematic and critical review of the literature on the association between breast implants and the risk of rheumatic disease. Methods A qualitative systematic review was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM-Reviews and CINAHL Complete from database inception to June 23rd, 2021. Eligible papers were full-length articles in English or French reporting original data on the incident risk of rheumatic disease among individuals with and without breast implants. Data were extracted from published reports and appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The main outcome was incident risk of systemic sclerosis (SSc), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), fibromyalgia and other rheumatic disorders and symptoms. Results Out of 3,425 identified citations, 86 met inclusion criteria. Two cohort studies suggested a two-fold increase in risk of SSc, whereas three case-control studies showed no increase in risk. Three cohort studies did not find an increased risk of incident and confirmed SS among breast implant users, however symptoms of sicca, myalgia and fatigue were reported more frequently. A meta-analysis of heterogenous studies reported a less than two-fold increase in risk of RA. Studies did not support an association with SLE. Insufficient evidence was available for autoimmune myositis and other rheumatic diseases. Implant rupture detected on imaging was not clearly associated with incident rheumatic disease, although no studies specifically examined the risk associated with acute/traumatic rupture. Little data was available on the safety of saline breast implants. Explantation often led to temporary improvement. Conclusions Based on a small number of high-quality and methodologically robust studies, an association between breast implants and a small increase in risk of SSc and RA could not be excluded. Symptoms of sicca, myalgia and fatigue were reported more frequently among breast implant users. Overall, there remains much uncertainty in regard to the association between breast implants and the risk of incident rheumatic diseases. Individuals considering the placement of breast implants should be informed of this uncertainty. Trial Registration This study was registered in the PROSPERO database (#CRD42019133616).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Hoa
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kathleen Milord
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie Hudson
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Stephen C Nicolaidis
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Josiane Bourré-Tessier
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Borba V, Malkova A, Basantsova N, Halpert G, Andreoli L, Tincani A, Amital H, Shoenfeld Y. Classical Examples of the Concept of the ASIA Syndrome. Biomolecules 2020; 10:biom10101436. [PMID: 33053910 PMCID: PMC7600067 DOI: 10.3390/biom10101436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) was first introduced in 2011 by Shoenfeld et al. and encompasses a cluster of related immune mediated diseases, which develop among genetically prone individuals as a result of adjuvant agent exposure. Since the recognition of ASIA syndrome, more than 4400 documented cases have been reported so far, illustrated by heterogeneous clinical manifestations and severity. In this review, five enigmatic conditions, including sarcoidosis, Sjögren's syndrome, undifferentiated connective tissue disease, silicone implant incompatibility syndrome (SIIS), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), are defined as classical examples of ASIA. Certainly, these disorders have been described after an adjuvant stimulus (silicone implantation, drugs, infections, metals, vaccines, etc.) among genetically predisposed individuals (mainly the HLA-DRB1 and PTPN22 gene), which induce an hyperstimulation of the immune system resulting in the production of autoantibodies, eventually leading to the development of autoimmune diseases. Circulating autonomic autoantibodies in the sera of patients with silicone breast implants, as well as anatomopathological aspects of small fiber neuropathy in their skin biopsies have been recently described. To our knowledge, these novel insights serve as a common explanation to the non-specific clinical manifestations reported in patients with ASIA, leading to the redefinition of the ASIA syndrome diagnostic criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vânia Borba
- Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer 5265601, Israel; (V.B.); (G.H.); (H.A.)
| | - Anna Malkova
- Laboratory of the Mosaic of Autoimmunity, Saint Petersburg State University, 5265601 Saint-Petersburg, Russia; (A.M.); (N.B.)
| | - Natalia Basantsova
- Laboratory of the Mosaic of Autoimmunity, Saint Petersburg State University, 5265601 Saint-Petersburg, Russia; (A.M.); (N.B.)
| | - Gilad Halpert
- Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer 5265601, Israel; (V.B.); (G.H.); (H.A.)
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Laura Andreoli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (L.A.); (A.T.)
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, ASST Spedali Civili, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Angela Tincani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (L.A.); (A.T.)
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, ASST Spedali Civili, 25123 Brescia, Italy
- Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119146 Moscow, Russia
| | - Howard Amital
- Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer 5265601, Israel; (V.B.); (G.H.); (H.A.)
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Yehuda Shoenfeld
- Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer 5265601, Israel; (V.B.); (G.H.); (H.A.)
- Laboratory of the Mosaic of Autoimmunity, Saint Petersburg State University, 5265601 Saint-Petersburg, Russia; (A.M.); (N.B.)
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Breast Prosthesis Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Management Algorithm. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44:1423-1437. [PMID: 32152711 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-01663-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The cosmetic use of devices like prostheses to increase breast volume is nothing new. It is calculated that millions of people have been exposed to silicone in several ways, including breast implants, and since 1964 there has been uncertainty regarding their safety. We did not find in the literature any studies that reported the appearance of a specific immunological disease in patients with silicone breast implants. Furthermore, there are also neither case-control studies nor reports of patients proving that symptoms of autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) occurred after the placement of silicone implants nor that the patients had pre-existing symptoms. Several studies link silicone to allergic reactions and the development of systemic autoimmune diseases; however, other studies deny this association. There are currently several theories about the effect of silicone on the body. One theory with greater acceptance proposes an adjuvant effect of silicone on the development of autoimmune diseases in genetically predisposed patients. However, the variety of symptoms occurring in patients who develop these pathologies leads to doubts about the relationship between the adjuvant effects of a silicone prosthesis may have with a specific autoimmune disease or a mix of these diseases. The lack of consensus on this topic obliges a full review of what has already been reported in the literature to integrate the knowledge and propose a focus for new research on this matter. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
|
7
|
Scleroderma-like syndrome in a woman with silicone breast implants - case report and critical review of the literature. Reumatologia 2019; 57:55-58. [PMID: 30858632 PMCID: PMC6409829 DOI: 10.5114/reum.2019.83241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Various silicon compounds have been reported to stimulate autoimmune reactions in the human body. Based on case reports, a possible causal association between silicone breast implants and systemic sclerosis has been suggested since the end of the 1970s. Although the relationship between systemic sclerosis and silicone breast implants has been intensely investigated, no clear evidence of such an association has ever been found in epidemiological studies. Instead, it is now proposed that silicone breast implants can induce nonspecific symptoms of inflammatory diseases, despite not fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for a specific autoimmune disease. This phenomenon was named autoimmune syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA syndrome). ASIA syndrome is worth considering in the differential diagnosis in rheumatology patients. In this paper, we present a case of the scleroderma-like syndrome in a 48-year-old woman with a broken silicone breast implant and a review the current literature on this issue.
Collapse
|
8
|
Alijotas-Reig J, Esteve-Valverde E, Gil-Aliberas N, Garcia-Gimenez V. Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants-ASIA-related to biomaterials: analysis of 45 cases and comprehensive review of the literature. Immunol Res 2019; 66:120-140. [PMID: 29199390 DOI: 10.1007/s12026-017-8980-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Systemic autoimmune or granulomatous disorders related to biomaterials of human use have rarely been described. The aim of this study was to report cases of autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) related to biomaterial injections and prostheses, mainly silicone, hyaluronic acid, acrylamides and methacrylate compounds in a Spanish patient cohort. This study is a retrospective analysis of clinical, laboratory, histopathological and follow-up data of 45 cases of patients suffering from late-onset, non-infectious inflammatory/autoimmune disorders related to bioimplants. Late onset was defined as 3 months or more post injection. Data were obtained through a further non-systematic but comprehensive review of the literature. Forty-five cases of late-onset adverse reactions related to biomaterial injections or prostheses were reviewed. All cases had systemic complaints that could be categorised as ASIA. In all but four patients, inflammatory features at the implantation site preceded distant or systemic manifestations. Abnormal blood tests were common. Localised inflammatory nodules and panniculitis in 40/45 (88.88%) evolved into a variety of disorders, viz., primary biliary cirrhosis, Sjögren's syndrome, sarcoidosis, human adjuvant disease, vasculitis, inflammatory bowel syndrome and inflammatory polyradiculopathy. Five (11.11%) cases presented primarily with systemic autoimmune disorders. Biomaterials and prostheses can provoke late-onset systemic autoimmune disorders fulfilling ASIA criteria, or present primarily local/regional inflammatory reactions that may eventually evolve into systemic autoimmune and/or granulomatous disorders which fall under ASIA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaume Alijotas-Reig
- Systemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine-1, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. .,Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Natalia Gil-Aliberas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Althaia Network Health, Manresa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor Garcia-Gimenez
- Europe Medical Centre, Barcelona, Spain.,Spanish Society of Cosmetic Medicine & Surgery, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Colaris MJL, de Boer M, van der Hulst RR, Cohen Tervaert JW. Two hundreds cases of ASIA syndrome following silicone implants: a comparative study of 30 years and a review of current literature. Immunol Res 2018; 65:120-128. [PMID: 27406737 PMCID: PMC5406475 DOI: 10.1007/s12026-016-8821-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In this study, we compared one hundred patients with autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) due to silicone implant incompatibility syndrome diagnosed in 2014 in Maastricht, the Netherlands, with one hundred historical patients with adjuvant breast disease diagnosed in the Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA, between 1985 and 1992. Similarities and differences between these two cohorts were identified to determine whether the spectrum of silicone-related disease changed during the last 30 years. Patients with complaints possibly due to silicone-filled breast implants were prospectively examined in the Reinaert Clinic, Maastricht, the Netherlands between January 2014 and October 2014. All patients were evaluated for the fulfilment of ASIA criteria. Results were compared to results of the Baylor College cohort and 18 other reviewed historical cohorts. Clinical manifestations between the Maastricht and Baylor College cohorts were comparable. Fatigue was observed in 98 current patients and in 95 historical patients. Arthralgia was observed in 91 versus 81 historical patients. Myalgia was observed in 54 versus 91 patients. Cognitive impairment was observed in 78 versus 81 patients, pyrexia was observed in 64 versus 52 patients, sicca complaints in 73 versus 72 patients and severe neurological manifestations in 20 versus 32 patients. From the 54 patients who underwent removal of their silicone breast implant, 50 % (n = 27) of the patients experienced improvement of complaints after explantation of the implant. Also, in the 18 reviewed historical cohorts, similar clinical manifestations were described. Our findings suggest that no major changes were present in the observed clinical manifestations between the Maastricht and Baylor College cohorts. Also, despite changes in the principal constituents of the silicone implants during the past fifty years, silicone remained an adjuvant that may ‘bleed’ and subsequently may be a chronic stimulus to the immune system resulting in similar clinical manifestations as observed in the Maastricht cohort, the Baylor College cohort and 18 other large cohorts of patients. We therefore conclude that silicone-related disease has not changed during the last 30 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje J L Colaris
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Reconstructive, Plastic and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mintsje de Boer
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Reconstructive, Plastic and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rene R van der Hulst
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Reconstructive, Plastic and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem Cohen Tervaert
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,Clinical and Experimental Immunology, Reinaert Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
de Boer M, Colaris M, van der Hulst RRWJ, Cohen Tervaert JW. Is explantation of silicone breast implants useful in patients with complaints? Immunol Res 2018; 65:25-36. [PMID: 27412295 PMCID: PMC5406477 DOI: 10.1007/s12026-016-8813-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
In this review, we present a critical review of the existing literature reflecting the results of explantation of silicone breast implants in patients with silicone-related complaints and/or autoimmune diseases. A literature search was performed to discuss the following issues: which clinical manifestations and autoimmune diseases improve after explantation, and what is the course of these complaints after explantation. Next, we reviewed studies in which the effect of explantation on laboratory findings observed in patients with silicone breast implants was studied, and lastly, we reviewed studies that described the effect of reconstruction of the breast with a new implant or autologous tissue after explantation. We calculated from the literature that explantation of the silicone breast improved silicone-related complaints in 75 % of the patients (469 of 622). In patients with autoimmune diseases, however, improvement was only infrequently observed without additional therapy with immunosuppressive therapy, i.e., in 16 % of the patients (3 of 18). The effect of explantation did not influence autoantibody testing such as ANA. We discuss several possibilities which could clarify why patients improve after explantation. Firstly, the inflammatory response could be reduced after explantation. Secondly, explantation of the implants may remove a nociceptive stimulus, which may be the causative factor for many complaints. Options for reconstruction of the explanted breast are autologous tissue and/or water-/hydrocellulose-filled breast implant. Unfortunately, in very few studies attention was paid to reconstructive possibilities. Therefore, no adequate conclusion regarding this issue could be drawn. In conclusion, explantation is useful for improvement of silicone-related complaints in 75 % of the patients, whereas in patients who developed autoimmune diseases improvement is only observed when explantation is combined with immunosuppressive therapy. In a patient with silicone-related complaints in which explantation is considered, the patient should be counseled for the different options of reconstruction after explantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M de Boer
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Reconstructive, Plastic and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M Colaris
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Reconstructive, Plastic and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R R W J van der Hulst
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Reconstructive, Plastic and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J W Cohen Tervaert
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Clinical and Experimental Immunology, Reinaert Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large-scale epidemiologic studies to date have not found any credible association between silicone breast implants and either well-defined connective tissue diseases or undefined or atypical connective tissue diseases. It has been hypothesized that implant rupture could prompt an immunologic reaction giving rise to autoimmune or related diseases. In this article, the authors review the available literature on implant ruptures and connective tissue disease. METHODS Articles were identified from PubMed and by cross-checking reference lists of retrieved articles. RESULTS Five publications were identified. In none of the studies were diseases or symptoms related to well-defined or ill-defined connective tissue diseases associated with rupture status. CONCLUSIONS There appears to be little scientific basis for any association between implant rupture and well-defined connective tissue disease or undefined or atypical connective tissue diseases. The concept of silicone-related disease was developed by rheumatologists based on highly selected groups of symptomatic breast implant patients seen in their practices. It is likely that nonspecific complications or symptoms related perhaps to capsular contracture or implant rupture may be misinterpreted as representing a systemic disease.
Collapse
|
12
|
Spiegel JH. Atypical presentations of Sjögren disease. South Med J 2006; 98:1163-4. [PMID: 16440913 DOI: 10.1097/01.smj.0000189975.91713.86] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
13
|
Cieśla S. Radical mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction using the Becker prosthesis. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2005. [DOI: 10.1016/s1507-1367(05)71076-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|