Ten experiments that would make a difference in understanding immune mechanisms

An observation that illustrates most T cell receptor structure-function relationships

The Standard model of the T cell receptor (TCR) structure-function relationships is based on an analogy with the B cell receptor. Here a single observation is analyzed to show why this appears to be untenable. The Standard model cannot account for allele-specific recognition of theMHC-encoded presenter of peptide (R) by the TCR nor can it adequately explain alloreactivity. The competing framework is based on the assumptions that (1) single V-domains recognize the alleles of R, (2) restrictive reactivity is peptide specific, whereas alloreactivity is peptide unspecific, and (3) the TCR is born in two conformations, which display reciprocal behaviors (see text). In any case, whatever position one takes regarding these two models, competing conceptualizations are of crucial value in guiding experimentation, not to mention creative thinking.

Core principles characterizing immune function

The immune system is an anticipatory mechanism designed by evolution to protect the individual against noxious agents and harmful cellular debris. In order to recognize substances that it has never encountered, the immune system somatically generates an appropriately sized random (with respect to self and nonself [NS]) recognitive repertoire that is coupled to a biodestructive and ridding output. Consequently, a Self-NS discrimination is required in order to avoid autoimmunity. This essay is an attempt to highlight the core principles upon which this anticipatory mechanism depends in order to function.

Contemplating Bretscher's View that the Tritope Model is 'Implausible'

There is, at present, only two models of the TCR structure-function relationship. These are referred to here as the Standard (Centric) model and the Tritope model. While I have argued that the Standard model is untenable and proposed the Tritope to replace it, Bretscher has argued that the Tritope model is 'implausible' and throws his support for the Standard model. This essay analyses the implausibility argument concluding that it is unfounded.

Thoughts on Positive Selection in Thymus

Any analysis of the mechanism of signalling during positive selection in the thymus is dependent on one's model of the TCR-ligand interaction. To date, thinking about mechanism has been dominated by what might be termed the Standard (or Centric) model, which is based on analogy between the BCR and the TCR. As the present analysis is an independent rationalized view of the TCR-ligand interactions, it permits a more balanced view of positive selection. The goal here was to explore this alternative to the Standard model.

Two unresolved problems facing models of the Self-Nonself discrimination

Although the Associative (linked) Recognition of Antigen (ARA) model for a Self (S)-Nonself (NS) discrimination, now over 50 years old, is built on a solid conceptual and experimental base, two unsettled questions remain. In examining these questions, unanticipated aspects of the ARA Model itself had to be reconsidered. This essay spells out these problems and suggests possible solutions.

Thoughts engendered by Bretscher's Two-step, Two-signal model for a peripheral self-non-self discrimination and the origin of primer effector T helpers

There are three questions under re-examination here that have been inspired by Bretscher's 'Two-step, Two-signal' model. First, what is the nature of the steps required in order for antigen-responsive cells to become effectors? Second, how does the immune system get started? Third and the most troublesome, what is the mechanism that relates the delivery of the two signals? To answer the first question, Bretscher proposes a pathway that I will place in another context by comparing it with what had been envisaged under the Associative Recognition of Antigen (ARA) model. The second question, how does the immune system gets started, is crucial to our understanding of the self-non-self discrimination. This problem boils down to, what is the origin of the first effector T helper (eTh) cells required to activate all antigen-responsive cells including the T helpers themselves (the primer problem)? To deal with this question, I proposed an antigen-independent pathway to primer eTh. Bretscher presents us with an antigen-dependent pathway to primer eTh. As competing models are precious in clarifying thinking and in guiding experimentation, I felt it important to reanalyse the two models and look for ways to decide between them. The third question deals with the requirement for and the mechanism of associative (linked) recognition of antigen (ARA). The concept of ARA is so compelling at both the experimental and theoretical levels that to save it, a new perspective will be introduced.