Utility of cardiac CT for evaluating delayed contrast enhancement in dilated cardiomyopathy

Cardiac Imaging in Athlete's Heart: The Role of the Radiologist

Athlete’s heart (AH) is the result of morphological and functional cardiac modifications due to long-lasting athletic training. Athletes can develop very marked structural myocardial changes, which may simulate or cover unknown cardiomyopathies. The differential diagnosis between AH and cardiomyopathy is necessary to prevent the risk of catastrophic events, such as sudden cardiac death, but it can be a challenging task. The improvement of the imaging modalities and the introduction of the new technologies in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and cardiac computed tomography (CCT) can allow overcoming this challenge. Therefore, the radiologist, specialized in cardiac imaging, could have a pivotal role in the differential diagnosis between structural adaptative changes observed in the AH and pathological anomalies of cardiomyopathies. In this review, we summarize the main CMR and CCT techniques to evaluate the cardiac morphology, function, and tissue characterization, and we analyze the imaging features of the AH and the key differences with the main cardiomyopathies.

Cardiac magnetic resonance in hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathies

Cardiomyopathies are a heterogeneous entity. The progress in the field of genetics has allowed over the years to determine its origin more and more often. The classification of these pathologies has changed over the years; it has been updated with new knowledge. Imaging allows to define the phenotypic characteristics of the different forms of cardiomyopathy. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) allows a morphological evaluation of the associated (and sometimes pathognomonic) cardiac findings of any form of cardiomyopathy. The tissue characterization sequences also make magnetic resonance imaging unique in its ability to detect changes in myocardial tissue. This review aims to define the features that can be highlighted by CMR in hypertrophic and dilated forms and the possible differential diagnoses. In hypertrophic forms, CMR provides: precise evaluation of wall thickness in all segments, ventricular function and size and evaluation of possible presence of areas of fibrosis as well as changes in myocardial tissue (measurement of T1 mapping and extracellular volume values). In dilated forms, cardiac resonance is the gold standard in the assessment of ventricular volumes. CMR highlights also the potential alterations of the myocardial tissue.

The Value of T1 Mapping Techniques in the Assessment of Myocardial Interstitial Fibrosis

Cardiac fibrosis, characterized by net accumulation of extracellular matrix in the myocardium, is a common final pathway of heart failure. This myocardial fibrosis (MF) is not necessarily the primary cause of dysfunction; it often results from a reparative process activated in response to cardiomyocyte injury. In light of currently available treatments, late-identified MF could be definitive or irreversible, associated with worsening ventricular systolic function, abnormal cardiac remodeling, and increased ventricular stiffness and arrhythmia. T1 mapping should be used to detect incipient changes leading to myocardial damage in several clinical conditions and also in subclinical disease. This article reviews available techniques for MF detection, focusing on noninvasive quantification of diffuse fibrosis and clinical applications.

Diagnostic Value of Different Noninvasive Criteria of Latent Myocarditis in Comparison with Myocardial Biopsy

Purpose: The aim of this study was to quantify the value of various clinical, laboratory, and instrumental signs in the diagnosis of myocarditis in comparison with morphological studies of the myocardium. Methods: In 100 patients (65 men, 44.7 ± 12.5 years old) with “idiopathic” arrhythmias (n = 20) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM; n = 80), we performed the following: 71 endomyocardial biopsies (EMB), 13 intraoperative biopsies, 5 studies of explanted hearts, and 11 autopsies with virus investigation (real-time PCR) of the blood and myocardium. Antiheart antibodies (AHA) were also measured as well as cardiac CT (n = 45), MRI (n = 25), and coronary angiography (n = 47). The comparison group included 50 patients (25 men, 53.7 ± 11.7 years old) with noninflammatory heart diseases who underwent open heart surgery. Results: Active/borderline myocarditis was diagnosed in 76.0% of the study group and in 21.6% of patients in the comparison group (p < 0.001). The myocardial viral genome was observed more frequently in patients in the comparison group than in the study group (65.0 and 40.2%; p < 0.01). We evaluated the diagnostic value of noninvasive markers of myocarditis. The panel of AHA had the greatest importance in the identification of myocarditis: sensitivity was 81.5%, and the positive and negative predictive values were 75.0 and 60.5%. This defined the diagnostic value of noninvasive markers of myocarditis and established a diagnostic algorithm providing an individual assessment of the likelihood of myocarditis development. Conclusion: AHA have the greatest significance in the diagnosis of latent myocarditis in patients with “idiopathic” arrhythmias and DCM. The use of a complex of noninvasive criteria allows the probability of myocarditis to be estimated and the indications for EMB to be determined.

The predictive value of cardiac morphology for long-term outcome of patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

Catheter ablation (CA) is an established therapy for selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but predictors of CA ablation outcome are still not fully elucidated. The aim of the study was to identify structural and morphological parameters from computed tomography (CT) as predictors of successful CA of AF in a single center prospective cohort.

METHODS

An analysis of CT scans dedicated to LA evaluation was performed in 99 patients (63 ± 8 years old, 70% males, 59% paroxysmal AF) scheduled for CA of AF. Survival free of atrial fibrillation/flutter/tachycardia at 1- and 3-years was assessed.

RESULTS

In overall study population, both 1- and 3-year responders had smaller distance to the first division in left superior pulmonary vein (16.3 ± 5.42 mm vs. 19.1 ± 7.0 mm and 14.9 ± 3.6 mm vs. 18.7 ± 7.0 mm; p < 0.05). One-year responders had larger ostium area of left inferior pulmonary vein (median 236 mm² [IQR = 97] vs. 222 mm² [IQR = 71]; p = 0.03) and less acute angle between the interatrial septum and the right superior pulmonary vein (102 ± 20° vs. 95 ± 10°; p = 0.03). Three-years' responders had smaller ostium area of the right superior pulmonary vein (248 ± 94 mm² vs. 364 ± 282 mm²; p = 0.02). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified different predictors in paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal AF. For patients with paroxysmal AF, the predictors were angle to right superior pulmonary vein and left superior/inferior pulmonary veins carina thickness with hazard ratios of 0.965 (95%CI 0.939 to 0.992, p = 0.010) and 0.747 (95%CI 0.591 to 0.944, p = 0.015). In patients with persistent AF, the predictors were gender and NYHA stage with hazard ratios of 4.9 (95%CI 1.758 to 13.579, p = 0.002) and 0.365 (95%CI 0.148 to 0.899, p = 0.028) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomy of LA, especially morphology of pulmonary veins, seems to be one of the predictors of clinical outcome after CA for paroxysmal AF. In non-paroxysmal AF LA anatomy is less relevant in prediction of clinical outcome.

Advanced Non-invasive Imaging Techniques in Chronic Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies : Focus on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomographic

Cardiomyopathies (Cs) are a heterogeneous group of myocardial diseases with structural and/or functional abnormalities.The aetiology is due to genetic-family substrate in most cases, however, the correct and detailed analysis of morphofunctional abnormalities (severity and distribution of hypertrophy, ventricular dilatation, ventricular dysfunction) and tissue characteristics (myocardial fibrosis, myocardial infiltration) are a crucial element for a definite diagnosis.Among the different diagnostic imaging modalities applied in clinical practice (echocardiography, nuclear medicine), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as a non-invasive diagnostic tool having high ability to quantify systolic function and tissue abnormalities that represent the substrates of many Cs.The main added value of CMR is the ability to identify cardiomyopathies with respect to ischemic heart disease and, above all, to discriminate the major types of cardiomyopathies based on morpho-functional presentation patterns and the presence and location of myocardial fibrosis.Many CMR elements allow increasing diagnostic accuracy but CMR data should be integrated with an appropriate clinical and instrumental context.Computed Tomographic (CT) scan technology has showed a complementary role in patients having Cs and HF.In this chapter, the diagnostic, pathophysiologic and prognostic value of CMR and CT in heart failure due to the most common cardiomyopathies will be discussed.