Quality improvement of end‑of‑life decision-making and communication in the ICU : Effect on clinicians' burnout and relatives' distress

Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Family-Centered Care for Adult ICUs: 2024

RATIONALE

For staff in adult ICUs, providing family-centered care is an essential skill that affects important outcomes for both patients and families. The COVID-19 pandemic placed unprecedented strain on care of ICU families, and practices for family engagement and support are still adjusting.

OBJECTIVES

To review updated evidence for family support in adult ICUs, provide clear recommendations, and spotlight optimal family-centered care practices post-pandemic.

PANEL DESIGN

The multiprofessional guideline panel of 28 individuals, including family member partners, applied the processes described in the Society of Critical Care Medicine Standard Operating Procedures Manual to develop and publish evidence-based recommendations in alignment with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Conflict-of-interest policies were strictly followed in all phases of the guidelines, including panel selection, writing, and voting.

METHODS

The guidelines consist of four content sections: engagement of families, support of family needs, communication support, and support of ICU clinicians providing family-centered care. We conducted systematic reviews for 15 Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes questions, organized among these content sections, to identify the best available evidence. We summarized and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. We used the GRADE evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or conditional, or as best practice statements where appropriate. The recommendations were approved using an online vote requiring greater than 80% agreement of voting panel members to pass.

RESULTS

Our panel issued 17 statements related to optimal family-centered care in adult ICUs, including one strong recommendation, 14 conditional recommendations, and two best practice statements. We reaffirmed the critical importance of liberalized family presence policies as default practice when possible and suggested options for family attendance on rounds and participation in bedside care. We suggested that ICUs provide support for families in the form of educational programs; ICU diaries; and mental health, bereavement, and spiritual support. We suggested the importance of providing structured communication for families and communication training for clinicians but did not recommend for or against any specific clinician-facing tools for family support or decision aids, based on current available evidence. We recommended that adult ICUs implement practices to systematically identify and reduce barriers to equitable critical care delivery for families and suggested that programs designed to support the wellbeing of clinicians responsible for family support be developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our guideline panel achieved consensus regarding recommendations and best practices for family-centered care in adult ICUs.

A case for preference-sensitive decision timelines to aid shared decision-making in intensive care: need and possible application

In the intensive care unit, it can be challenging to determine which interventions align with the patients' preferences since patients are often incapacitated and other sources, such as advance directives and surrogate input, are integral. Managing treatment decisions in this context requires a process of shared decision-making and a keen awareness of the preference-sensitive instances over the course of treatment. The present paper examines the need for the development of preference-sensitive decision timelines, and, taking aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as a use case, proposes a model of one such timeline to illustrate their potential form and value. First, the paper draws on an overview of relevant literature to demonstrate the need for better guidance to (a) aid clinicians in determining when to elicit patient preference, (b) support the drafting of advance directives, and (c) prepare surrogates for their role representing the will of an incapacitated patient in clinical decision-making. This first section emphasizes that highlighting when patient (or surrogate) input is necessary can contribute valuably to shared decision-making, especially in the context of intensive care, and can support advance care planning. As an illustration, the paper offers a model preference-sensitive decision timeline-whose generation was informed by existing guidelines and a series of interviews with patients, surrogates, and neuro-intensive care clinicians-for a use case of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. In the last section, the paper offers reflections on how such timelines could be integrated into digital tools to aid shared decision-making.

Factors Influencing the Initiative Behavior of Intensive Care Unit Nurses toward End-of-Life Decision Making: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Although the importance of intensive care unit (ICU) nurse initiative in end-of-life (EOL) decision making has been confirmed, there are few studies on the nurses' initiative in EOL situations. Objectives: To explore the role and mechanism of facilitators/barriers and perceived stress on the behavior of ICU nurses that initiate EOL decision making (i.e., initiative behavior). Design: This research adopted a cross-sectional descriptive design. Setting/Participants: A questionnaire composed of demographics, facilitators/barriers scale, perceived stress scale, and initiative behavior for EOL decision-making scale was used for registered ICU nurses in five tertiary general hospitals in Zhejiang Province, China. Results: The average score of the EOL decision initiative behavior was 5.54 on a range of 2-10. The results of correlation analysis indicated that the facilitators promote the initiative behavior, whereas the barriers interfere with initiative behavior. Facilitators/barriers in the EOL decision-making process significantly predicted the initiative behavior of ICU nurses in decision making (β = 0.698, p < 0.001). Facilitators/barriers had a significant indirect effect on the initiative behavior of ICU nurses through perceived stress. The 95% confidence interval was (-0.327 to -0.031), and the mediating effect of perceived stress accounted for 6.31% of the total effect. Conclusion: In the EOL context, the decision initiative of ICU nurses was at a medium level. Medical managers should implement intervention strategies based on the path that affects the initiative behavior of ICU nurses to reduce barriers and stress level in the decision-making process. That is, they should improve inter-team collaboration, nurse-patient communication, clarity of role responsibilities, and emotional support in dying situations to increase initiative and participation of ICU nurses in decision making.

Factors associated with critical care nurses' acute stress disorder after patient death

BACKGROUND

In intensive care units, patient death can have a negative psychological influence on the patient's nurse. However, how the frequency of events and factors contributed to acute stress among nurses remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to explore the prevalence of and the factors affecting acute stress disorder among intensive care unit nurses after their patient death.

METHODS

Nurses from five adult intensive care units whose patient had died during the nurses' working shift were recruited from July 2018 to April 2019. Bryant's Acute Stress Disorder Scale, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Beck Depression Inventory-II were used to measure acute stress, depression, and anxiety. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, independent sample t-tests, and stepwise logistic regression were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 119 nurses were enrolled. Nearly one in three nurses (29.4%) had suffered from acute stress disorder after their patient had died. Nurses experienced a higher risk of acute stress disorder when their patients underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation before death (odds ratio [OR] = 13.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.59-72.95), when their patients died unexpectedly (OR = 4.88, 95% CI: 1.16-20.56), and when they experienced verbal abuse from the patient family at the patient death (OR = 4.61, 95% CI: 1.18-18.05) compared with their counterparts.

CONCLUSION

Intensive care unit nurses often experience acute stress disorder after their patient death. The nurses of patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation before death and/or who died unexpectedly and/or nurses who were subjected to verbal abuse by the patient's family were at higher risk of acute stress disorder. A comprehensive program aimed at improving the knowledge, skills, and resilience of nurses is needed.

The impact of bereavement support on psychological distress in family members: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Persistent psychological distress occurs frequently in family members of patients who die in an intensive care unit (ICU). Objective: To determine the effectiveness of bereavement interventions in reducing persisting psychological distress in bereaved family members after death in an adult ICU. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that assessed the effect of bereavement interventions on persisting psychological distress in bereaved family members of ICU patients. Data sources: MEDLINE and APA PsycInfo databases were searched until April 2020. Review methods: Two of us independently screened titles and abstracts of identified studies, and then completed full text evaluation of selected studies. We assessed risk of bias using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, which is designed to assess the quality of non-randomised studies in meta-analyses. We also used random effects meta-analysis to assess the effect of various interventions on total Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores. Results: From 664 citations, five studies were included - three multicentre randomised clinical trials and two single centre observational studies. Three studies tested the intervention of written bereavement support materials and two studies used narration of family members' experiences in the ICU. All studies reported HADS scores. Scores for Impact of Event Scale, Impact of Event Scale-Revised and Inventory of Complicated Grief were measured in some but not all studies. There was no effect of an intervention on HADS scores (weighted mean difference, -0.79 [95% confidence interval, -3.81 to 2.23]; I2 = 65.8%). Conclusions: Owing to limited data, and clinical and statistical heterogeneity, there is considerable uncertainty regarding whether bereavement support strategies reduce, increase or have no effect on psychological distress in bereaved family members.