1
|
Özkul Y, İşlek A, Bayrak AF, Akdağ E, Etit D. Tumor Volume Staging Provides a Comparable Stratifying for Laryngeal Squamous Cell Cancer According to T Stages. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 75:1344-1351. [PMID: 37636709 PMCID: PMC10447356 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-03522-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The prognostic significance of tumor volume (TV) in laryngeal squamous cell cancer (LSCC) has been demonstrated previously. Still, its clinical use is uncertain, and a method for accurate staging for TV is lacking. This study aimed to develop an objective staging and determine the effect of tumor volume on disease outcome after surgical treatment for LSCC. This study was designed retrospectively. Patients with LSCC who underwent laryngectomy were identified. Discretization for optimal scaling level of Tumor Volume (TV) was performed by Catreg Version 3.0. The rate of cancer recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rate were calculated and compared between T stage and TV staging. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed for comparison. 206 LSCC patients enrolled in the study. TV was found significantly higher in patients with cartilage invasion, contralateral nodal metastasis, and extranodal extension (p = 0.004, 0.010, and 0.021, respectively). TV and lymph node density LND showed a low significant positive correlation (p = 0.015, r = 0.169). TV was 7.25 + 7.53 ml on average, and TV above the mean value was found to be an independent risk factor for OS and DFS (p = 0.043, HR = 1.8; CI95% for HR: 1.02-3.44 and p < 0.001, HR = 3.7; CI95% for HR: 1.8-7.3, respectively). The optimal scaling level of TV was found in three-level; group 1: TV ≤ 7.07, group 2: 7.07 < TV ≤ 14.09, and group 3: TV ≥ 14.10. This categorization of TV has obtained significant discretization between patients for DFS and OS (Long-Rank = 0.038 and < 0.001). This classification may provide better performance in addition to helping the T stage in determining prognosis, especially in patients with advanced laryngeal SCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yılmaz Özkul
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Akif İşlek
- Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Clinic, Acibadem Eskişehir Hospital, Hoşnudiye Mah, Acıbadem Sk. No: 19, Tepebaşı, Eskişehir, Turkey
| | - Asuman Feda Bayrak
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ecem Akdağ
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Demet Etit
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kjems J, Elisabet Håkansson K, Andrup Kristensen C, Grau Eriksen J, Horsholt Kristensen M, Ivalu Sander Holm A, Overgaard J, Rønn Hansen C, Zukauskaite R, Johansen J, Richter Vogelius I, Friborg J. The influence of tumor volume on the risk of distant metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Radiother Oncol 2023; 186:109771. [PMID: 37385382 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Distant metastases (DM) in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are in most circumstances non-curable. The TNM staging system is insufficient to predict the risk of DM. This study investigates if the DM risk can be predicted using a multivariate model including pre-treatment total tumor volume for both p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and all other sites (other HNSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS The study includes patients with localized pharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas treated with primary radiotherapy from 2008-2017 from three head and neck cancer centers. Patients were identified in the Danish Head and Neck Cancer (DAHANCA) database. Total (nodal and primary) tumor volume (Gross Tumor Volume, GTV) was extracted from local treatment planning systems. The GTV was grouped by volume (cm3) in four intervals and included in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression controlled for pre-selected clinical values incl. stage. RESULTS The study includes 2,865 patients, of which 321 (11 %) had DM post-treatment. The risk of DM was assessed in a multivariate model based on 2,751 patients (p16-positive OPSCC: 1,032; and other HNSCC: 1,719). There was a significant association between GTV and the risk of DM, and in tumor volumes ≥ 50 cm3 hazard ratios of 7.6 (2.5-23.4) for p16-positive OPSCC and 4.1 (2.3-7.2) in other HNSCC were observed. CONCLUSION Tumor volume is an independent risk factor for DM. The addition of total tumor volume to a predictive model is important to identify subgroups of HNSCC patients at high risk of DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Kjems
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
| | | | - Claus Andrup Kristensen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
| | - Jesper Grau Eriksen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus 8200, Denmark.
| | | | | | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus 8200, Denmark.
| | - Christian Rønn Hansen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense 5000, Denmark; Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense 5000, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense 5000, Denmark.
| | - Ruta Zukauskaite
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense 5000, Denmark.
| | - Jørgen Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense 5000, Denmark.
| | - Ivan Richter Vogelius
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
| | - Jeppe Friborg
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adrian G, Carlsson H, Kjellén E, Sjövall J, Zackrisson B, Nilsson P, Gebre-Medhin M. Primary tumor volume and prognosis for patients with p16-positive and p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:107. [PMID: 35701827 PMCID: PMC9195357 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02074-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prescribed radiation dose to patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is standardized, even if the prognosis for individual patients may differ. Easy-at-hand pre-treatment risk stratification methods are valuable to individualize therapy. In the current study we assessed the prognostic impact of primary tumor volume for p16-positive and p16-negative tumors and in relationship to other prognostic factors for outcome in patients with OPSCC treated with primary radiation therapy (RT). METHODS Five hundred twenty-three OPSCC patients with p16-status treated with primary RT (68.0 Gy to 73.1 Gy in 7 weeks, or 68.0 Gy in 4.5 weeks), with or without concurrent chemotherapy, within three prospective trials were included in the study. Local failure (LF), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in relationship to the size of the primary gross tumor volume (GTV-T) and other prognostic factors were investigated. Efficiency of intensified RT (RT with total dose 73.1 Gy or given within 4.5 weeks) was analyzed in relationship to tumor volume. RESULTS The volume of GTV-T and p16-status were found to be the strongest prognostic markers for LF, PFS and OS. For p16-positive tumors, an increase in tumor volume had a significantly higher negative prognostic impact compared with p16-negative tumors. Within a T-classification, patients with a smaller tumor, compared with a larger tumor, had a better prognosis. The importance of tumor volume remained after adjusting for nodal status, age, performance status, smoking status, sex, and hemoglobin-level. The adjusted hazard ratio for OS per cm3 increase in tumor volume was 2.3% (95% CI 0-4.9) for p16-positive and 1.3% (95% 0.3-2.2) for p16-negative. Exploratory analyses suggested that intensified RT could mitigate the negative impact of a large tumor volume. CONCLUSIONS Outcome for patients with OPSCC treated with RT is largely determined by tumor volume, even when adjusting for other established prognostic factors. Tumor volume is significantly more influential for patients with p16-positive tumors. Patients with large tumor volumes might benefit by intensified RT to improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Adrian
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Henrik Carlsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Kjellén
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Johanna Sjövall
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology –Head and Neck Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Björn Zackrisson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Per Nilsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maria Gebre-Medhin
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Miszczyk M, Staniewska E, Jabłońska I, Lipka-Rajwa A, Stawiski K, Tarnawski R. Volumetric staging in radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancers. TUMORI JOURNAL 2021; 108:586-591. [PMID: 34628998 DOI: 10.1177/03008916211050959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite routine use of 3D radiotherapy planning in radical radio(chemo)therapy for oropharyngeal cancers, volumetric data have not been implemented in initial staging. We analyzed 228 oropharyngeal cancer cases treated at one institution between 2004 and 2014 to compare the predictive value of volumetric staging and tumor nodal metastasis staging system (TNM) and determine whether they could be complementary for the estimation of survival. METHODS This retrospective study analyzed 228 consecutive oropharyngeal cancer cases treated with radiotherapy (76.9%) or concurrent radiochemotherapy (23.1%) between 2004 and 2014. The volumetric parameters included primary gross tumor volume (pGTV), metastatic lymph nodes gross tumor volume (nGTV), and total gross tumor volume (tGTV), and were compared with the 7th edition of the TNM staging system. RESULTS Median overall survival (OS) was 30.3 months. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, tGTV had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66, followed by pGTV (AUC,0.64), nGTV (AUC 0.62), and TNM (AUC 0.6). The median OS for patients with tGTV ⩽32.2 mL was 40.5 months, compared to 15.4 months for >32.2 mL (p < 0.001). This threshold allowed for a statistically significant difference in survival between TNM stage IV cases with low and high tumor volume (p < 0.001). Despite both TNM and tGTV reaching statistical significance in univariate analysis, only the tGTV remained an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.07, confidence interval 1.02-1.12, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS tGTV is an independent prognostic factor, characterized by a higher discriminatory value than the TNM staging system, and can be used to further divide stage IV cases into subgroups with significantly different prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Miszczyk
- IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Emilia Staniewska
- IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Iwona Jabłońska
- IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Lipka-Rajwa
- IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Konrad Stawiski
- Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
| | - Rafał Tarnawski
- IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Adrian G, Gebre-Medhin M, Kjellén E, Wieslander E, Zackrisson B, Nilsson P. Altered fractionation diminishes importance of tumor volume in oropharyngeal cancer: Subgroup analysis of ARTSCAN-trial. Head Neck 2020; 42:2099-2105. [PMID: 32196826 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large tumor volume negatively impacts the outcome of radiation therapy (RT). Altered fractionation (AF) can improve local control (LC) compared with conventional fractionation (CF). The aim of the present study was to investigate if response to AF differs with tumor volume in oropharyngeal cancer. METHODS Three hundred and twenty four patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated in a randomized, phase III trial comparing CF (2 Gy/d, 5 d/wk, 7 weeks, total dose 68 Gy) to AF (1.1 Gy + 2 Gy/d, 5 d/wk, 4.5 weeks, total dose 68 Gy) were analyzed. RESULTS Tumor volume had less impact on LC for patients treated with AF. There was an interaction between tumor volume and fractionation schedule (P = .039). This differential response was in favor of CF for small tumors and of AF for large tumors. CONCLUSION AF diminishes the importance of tumor volume for local tumor control in oropharyngeal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Adrian
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maria Gebre-Medhin
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Kjellén
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elinore Wieslander
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Björn Zackrisson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Per Nilsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bogowicz M, Tanadini-Lang S, Veit-Haibach P, Pruschy M, Bender S, Sharma A, Hüllner M, Studer G, Stieb S, Hemmatazad H, Glatz S, Guckenberger M, Riesterer O. Perfusion CT radiomics as potential prognostic biomarker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1514-1518. [PMID: 31304860 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1629013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Bogowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S. Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - P. Veit-Haibach
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M. Pruschy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S. Bender
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - A. Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M. Hüllner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - G. Studer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - S. Stieb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - H. Hemmatazad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S. Glatz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M. Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - O. Riesterer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Center for Radiation Oncology, KSA-KSB, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Elicin O, Broglie MA, Fankhauser N, Stoeckli SJ, Pasche P, Reinhard A, Bongiovanni M, Huber GF, Morand GB, Soltermann A, Arnold A, Dettmer MS, Arnoux A, Stauffer E, Espeli V, Martucci F, Aebersold DM, Giger R. Comparison of contemporary staging systems for oropharynx cancer in a surgically treated multi‐institutional cohort. Head Neck 2018; 41:1395-1402. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.25574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University HospitalUniversity of Bern Bern Switzerland
| | - Martina A. Broglie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryKantonsspital St. Gallen St. Gallen Switzerland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Niklaus Fankhauser
- CTU Bern, and Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)University of Bern Bern Switzerland
| | - Sandro J. Stoeckli
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryKantonsspital St. Gallen St. Gallen Switzerland
| | - Philippe Pasche
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity Hospital of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
| | - Antoine Reinhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity Hospital of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
| | - Massimo Bongiovanni
- Service of Clinical PathologyLausanne University Hospital, Institute of Pathology Lausanne Switzerland
| | - Gerhard F. Huber
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryKantonsspital St. Gallen St. Gallen Switzerland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Grégoire B. Morand
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Alex Soltermann
- Institute of Surgical PathologyUniversity Hospital of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Andreas Arnold
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryInselspital, Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland
| | | | - André Arnoux
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryKantonsspital Aarau Aarau Switzerland
| | | | - Vittoria Espeli
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI) Bellinzona Switzerland
| | - Francesco Martucci
- Department of RadiooncologyOncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI) Bellinzona Switzerland
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University HospitalUniversity of Bern Bern Switzerland
| | - Roland Giger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryInselspital, Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Panje C, Riesterer O, Glanzmann C, Studer G. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio complements volumetric staging as prognostic factor in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:643. [PMID: 28893236 PMCID: PMC5594523 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3590-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Volumetric tumor staging has been shown as superior prognostic tool compared to the conventional TNM system in patients undergoing definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer. Recently, clinical immunoscores such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been investigated as prognostic markers in several tumor entities. The aim of this study was to assess the combined prognostic value of NLR and tumor volume in patients treated with IMRT for oropharyngeal cancer (OC). Methods Data on all consecutive patients treated for locally advanced or inoperable OC with IMRT from 2002–2011 was prospectively collected. Tumor volume was assessed based on the total gross tumor volume (tGTV) calculated by the treatment planning system volume algorithm. The NLR was collected by a retrospective analysis of differential blood count before initiation of therapy. Results Overall, 187 eligible patients were treated with a median IMRT dose of 69.6 Gy. Three-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for low, intermediate, high and very high tumor volume groups was 88%, 74%, 62% and 25%, respectively (p = 0.007). Patients with elevated NLR (>4.68) showed a significantly decreased 3-year RFS of 44% vs. 81% (p < 0.001) and 3-year OS of 56% vs. 84% (p < 0.001). The NLR remained a significant prognostic factor for RFS and OS when tested among tumor volume groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis confirmed both tumor volume and NLR as independent prognostic factors. The NLR offered further statistically significant prognostic differentiation of the small/intermediate/large tumor volume groups. Conclusion The NLR remains an independent prognostic factor for patients with OC undergoing radiotherapy independent of the tumor volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cédric Panje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Riesterer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Glanzmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Gabriela Studer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zürich, Switzerland. .,Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, CH-6000, Lucerne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lin CS, de Oliveira Santos AB, Silva ELE, de Matos LL, Moyses RA, Kulcsar MAV, Pinto FR, Brandão LG, Cernea CR. Tumor volume as an independent predictive factor of worse survival in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2017; 39:960-964. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.24714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2016] [Revised: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 12/12/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chin Shien Lin
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; São Paulo Brazil
| | - André Bandiera de Oliveira Santos
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Evandro Lima e Silva
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Leandro Luongo de Matos
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Raquel Ajub Moyses
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Marco Aurélio Vamondes Kulcsar
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Fábio Roberto Pinto
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Lenine Garcia Brandão
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Claudio Roberto Cernea
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; São Paulo Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Linge A, Lohaus F, Löck S, Nowak A, Gudziol V, Valentini C, von Neubeck C, Jütz M, Tinhofer I, Budach V, Sak A, Stuschke M, Balermpas P, Rödel C, Grosu AL, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Ganswindt U, Belka C, Pigorsch S, Combs SE, Mönnich D, Zips D, Buchholz F, Aust DE, Baretton GB, Thames HD, Dubrovska A, Alsner J, Overgaard J, Krause M, Baumann M. HPV status, cancer stem cell marker expression, hypoxia gene signatures and tumour volume identify good prognosis subgroups in patients with HNSCC after primary radiochemotherapy: A multicentre retrospective study of the German Cancer Consortium Radiation Oncology Group (DKTK-ROG). Radiother Oncol 2016; 121:364-373. [PMID: 27913065 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Revised: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of the tumour volume, HPV status, cancer stem cell (CSC) marker expression and hypoxia gene signatures, as potential markers of radiobiological mechanisms of radioresistance, in a contemporary cohort of patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), who received primary radiochemotherapy (RCTx). MATERIALS AND METHODS For 158 patients with locally advanced HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx or hypopharynx who were treated at six DKTK partner sites, the impact of tumour volume, HPV DNA, p16 overexpression, p53 expression, CSC marker expression and hypoxia-associated gene signatures on outcome of primary RCTx was retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint of this study was loco-regional control (LRC). RESULTS Univariate Cox regression revealed a significant impact of tumour volume, p16 overexpression, and SLC3A2 and CD44 protein expression on LRC. The tumour hypoxia classification showed a significant impact only for small tumours. In multivariate analyses an independent correlation of tumour volume, SLC3A2 expression, and the 15-gene hypoxia signature with LRC was identified (CD44 protein n/a because of no event in the CD44-negative group). Logistic modelling showed that inclusion of CD44 protein expression and p16 overexpression significantly improved the performance to predict LRC at 2years compared to the model with tumour volume alone. CONCLUSIONS Tumour volume, HPV status, CSC marker expression and hypoxia gene signatures are potential prognostic biomarkers for patients with locally advanced HNSCC, who were treated by primary RCTx. The study also supports that the individual tumour volumes should generally be included in biomarker studies and that panels of biomarkers are superior to individual parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annett Linge
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Fabian Lohaus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander Nowak
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Volker Gudziol
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Chiara Valentini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Martin Jütz
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Inge Tinhofer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ali Sak
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Freiburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Translational Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Group, Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer, Helmholtz Zentrum, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Group, Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer, Helmholtz Zentrum, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffi Pigorsch
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Germany; Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - David Mönnich
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Tübingen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Tübingen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frank Buchholz
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Medical Systems Biology, University Cancer Center (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Daniela E Aust
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Tumour- and Normal Tissue Bank, University Cancer Center (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Gustavo B Baretton
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Tumour- and Normal Tissue Bank, University Cancer Center (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Anna Dubrovska
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Germany
| | - Jan Alsner
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Mechthild Krause
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bogowicz M, Riesterer O, Bundschuh RA, Veit-Haibach P, Hüllner M, Studer G, Stieb S, Glatz S, Pruschy M, Guckenberger M, Tanadini-Lang S. Stability of radiomic features in CT perfusion maps. Phys Med Biol 2016; 61:8736-8749. [PMID: 27893446 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/61/24/8736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to identify a set of stable radiomic parameters in CT perfusion (CTP) maps with respect to CTP calculation factors and image discretization, as an input for future prognostic models for local tumor response to chemo-radiotherapy. Pre-treatment CTP images of eleven patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma and eleven patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were analyzed. 315 radiomic parameters were studied per perfusion map (blood volume, blood flow and mean transit time). Radiomics robustness was investigated regarding the potentially standardizable (image discretization method, Hounsfield unit (HU) threshold, voxel size and temporal resolution) and non-standardizable (artery contouring and noise threshold) perfusion calculation factors using the intraclass correlation (ICC). To gain added value for our model radiomic parameters correlated with tumor volume, a well-known predictive factor for local tumor response to chemo-radiotherapy, were excluded from the analysis. The remaining stable radiomic parameters were grouped according to inter-parameter Spearman correlations and for each group the parameter with the highest ICC was included in the final set. The acceptance level was 0.9 and 0.7 for the ICC and correlation, respectively. The image discretization method using fixed number of bins or fixed intervals gave a similar number of stable radiomic parameters (around 40%). The potentially standardizable factors introduced more variability into radiomic parameters than the non-standardizable ones with 56-98% and 43-58% instability rates, respectively. The highest variability was observed for voxel size (instability rate >97% for both patient cohorts). Without standardization of CTP calculation factors none of the studied radiomic parameters were stable. After standardization with respect to non-standardizable factors ten radiomic parameters were stable for both patient cohorts after correction for inter-parameter correlations. Voxel size, image discretization, HU threshold and temporal resolution have to be standardized to build a reliable predictive model based on CTP radiomics analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bogowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Murphy C, True L, Vakar-Lopez F, Xia J, Gulati R, Montgomery B, Tretiakova M. A Novel System for Estimating Residual Disease and Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Prostate 2016; 76:1285-92. [PMID: 27273062 PMCID: PMC4988926 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pathologic variables that characterize response of prostate carcinoma to current neoadjuvant therapy have not been characterized in detail. This study reports (i) the histological features of prostate cancer treated with abiraterone and enzalutamide and inter-pathologist variance in identifying these features, and (ii) the effect of the novel androgen deprivation agents on residual cancer volume. METHODS We reviewed sections of prostatectomies from 37 patients treated with neoadjuvant agents and 22 untreated patients, tabulated the frequency of nine features of cancer (intact cancer glands, isolated cancer cells, poorly formed glands, cribriform architecture, clear spaces, intraductal carcinoma, solid sheets of cancer cells, prominent nucleoli, and previously described ABC grouping) and two features of benign glands (prominent basal cells and coalescent corpora amylacea). We used several methods, including a novel metric (visual grid system), to estimate residual tumor volume. RESULTS The most highly reproducible features were ABC grouping (κ = 0.56-0.7), presence of intraductal carcinoma (κ = 0.34-0.72), cribriform architecture (κ = 0.42-0.68), solid sheets of tumor cells (κ = 0.44-0.56), and coalescent corpora amylacea (κ = 0.4-0.54). Among poorly reproducible features were prominent nucleoli (κ = 0.03-0.11), clear spaces (κ = 0.05-0.07), and poorly formed cancer glands (κ = 0.02-0.1). Determination of tumor mass was excellent regardless of the method used-maximum tumor size (κ = 0.9-0.94), tumor area (κ = 0.94-0.96), and grid-based tumor cellularity (κ = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS We propose using a set of parameters including maximum tumor size, tumor area/volume, cellularity, volume, and ABC grouping for evaluating radical prostatectomies post-neoadjuvant therapy. Prostate 76:1285-1292, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Murphy
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lawrence True
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Funda Vakar-Lopez
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jing Xia
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Roman Gulati
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Bruce Montgomery
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Maria Tretiakova
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rutkowski T. The role of tumor volume in radiotherapy of patients with head and neck cancer. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:23. [PMID: 24423415 PMCID: PMC3903043 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2013] [Accepted: 01/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The assumption that the larger tumor contains a higher number of clonogenic cells what may deteriorate prognosis of patients treated with RT has been confirmed in many clinical studies. Significant prognostic influence of tumor volume (TV) on radiotherapy (RT) outcome has been found for tumors of different localizations including patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Although TV usually is a stronger prognostic factor than T stage, commonly used TNM classification system dose not incorporate TV data. The aim of the paper is to refresh clinical data regarding the role of TV in RT of patients with HNC. At present somehow new meaning of TV could be employed in the aspect of modern RT techniques and combined treatment strategies. For larger TV more aggressive treatment options may be considered. In modern RT techniques escalated dose could be provided highly conformal or RT can be combined with systemic treatment increasing therapeutic ratio. In the study several reports estimating prognostic value of TV for patients with HNC treated with RT has been reviewed.Due to substantially various reported groups of patients as to tumor site, stage of disease or treatment strategies, precise cut-off value could not be establish in general, but the significant association between TV and treatment outcome had been found in almost all studies. There is a strong suggestion that TV should supplement clinical decision in the choice of optimal treatment strategy for patients with HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Rutkowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and the Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|