1
|
Scharl S, Zamboglou C, Strouthos I, Farolfi A, Serani F, Koerber SA, Debus J, Peeken JC, Vogel MME, Kroeze SGC, Guckenberger M, Krafcsik M, Hruby G, Emmett L, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Trapp C, Spohn SKB, Henkenberens C, Mayer B, Shelan M, Aebersold DM, Thamm R, Wiegel T. European association of urology risk stratification predicts outcome in patients receiving PSMA-PET-planned salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110215. [PMID: 38458259 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The European Association of Urology (EAU) proposed a risk stratification (high vs. low risk) for patients with biochemical recurrence (BR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). Here we investigated whether this stratification accurately predicts outcome, particularly in patients staged with PSMA-PET. METHODS For this study, we used a retrospective database including 1222 PSMA-PET-staged prostate cancer patients who were treated with salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for BR, at 11 centers in 5 countries. Patients with lymph node metastases (pN1 or cN1) or unclear EAU risk group were excluded. The remaining cohort comprised 526 patients, including 132 low-risk and 394 high-risk patients. RESULTS The median follow-up time after SRT was 31.0 months. The 3-year biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) was 85.7 % in EAU low-risk versus 69.4 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.002). The 3-year metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 94.4 % in low-risk versus 87.6 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.005). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 99.0 % in low-risk versus 99.6 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.925). In multivariate analysis, EAU risk group remained a statistically significant predictor of BPFS (p = 0.003, HR 2.022, 95 % CI 1.262-3.239) and MFS (p = 0.013, HR 2.986, 95 % CI 1.262-7.058). CONCLUSION Our data support the EAU risk group definition. EAU risk grouping for BCR reliably predicted outcome in patients staged lymph node-negative after RP and with PSMA-PET before SRT. To our knowledge, this is the first study validating the EAU risk grouping in patients treated with PSMA-PET-planned SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Scharl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Serani
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | | | | | - Manuel Krafcsik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital - University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Benjamin Mayer
- Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Reinhard Thamm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Staruch M, Speth MM, Neyer P, Riesterer O, Aebersold DM, Stieb S. Radiation-associated changes in saliva composition of head and neck cancer patients: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2024:110279. [PMID: 38648994 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Xerostomia is a common radiation-associated toxicity in patients with head and neck cancer. Although several studies examined the decrease in saliva production due to radiotherapy (RT) and investigated the factors associated with this side effect, little is known about the change in radiation-associated saliva composition. This systematic review is the first to summarize existing data and give an overview of the change in pH/buffer capacity, electrolytes, proteins, enzymes, and mucins due to radiation to the salivary glands. Literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase with 47 articles finally eligible for the review, analyzing the saliva composition at several time points before, during and/or after RT, or comparing findings in irradiated patients to a healthy control group. Overall, RT leads to a substantial decrease in salivary pH and buffer capacity. For sodium, chloride and calcium ion, and amylase, an increased concentration or activity during RT was reported in most of the studies, followed by a subsequent decrease either already during RT or after the end of treatment. Different trends have been described for the total protein concentration during and after RT. Lactoferrin, however, increased considerably, especially in the first phase of RT. Mucin 5B (MUC5B) concentrations showed a slight increase during RT and concentrations around baseline values again six months post-radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Staruch
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marlene M Speth
- Otorhinolaryngology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Peter Neyer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Riesterer
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sonja Stieb
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shelan M, Achard V, Appiagyei F, Mose L, Zilli T, Fankhauser CD, Zamboglou C, Mohamad O, Aebersold DM, Cathomas R. Role of enzalutamide in primary and recurrent non-metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review of prospective clinical trials. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-024-00829-9. [PMID: 38589645 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00829-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Enzalutamide, a second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor, is indicated for the treatment of metastatic disease, as well as in the treatment of non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (PCa). This systematic review aims to determine outcomes and toxicity in patients with non-metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (nmCSPC) treated with enzalutamide in the primary or salvage settings. METHOD We performed a systematic review focusing on the role of Enzalutamide in the treatment of nmCSPC, using the PubMed/Medline database. Articles focusing on androgen receptor inhibitors in nmCSPC were included, while articles discussing exclusively metastatic or castration-resistant PCa were excluded. RESULTS The initial search retrieved 401 articles, of which 15 underwent a thorough assessment for relevance. Ultimately, 12 studies with pertinent outcomes were meticulously examined. Among these, seven studies were dedicated to the investigation of enzalutamide in the primary setting, while the remaining five publications specifically addressed its use in salvage settings. Regardless of the treatment setting, our data revealed two distinct therapeutic strategies. The first advocates for the substitution of enzalutamide for androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), based on the premise of achieving equivalent, if not superior, oncological outcomes while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. The second, adopting a more conventional approach, entails augmenting the effectiveness of ADT by incorporating enzalutamide. CONCLUSION Enzalutamide has considerable potential as a therapeutic strategy for nmCSPC, either used alone or in combination with ADT in the primary or in the salvage settings. The use of enzalutamide instead of ADT is an appealing strategy. However, more trials will be required to further understand the efficacy and side-effect profile of enzalutamide monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Vérane Achard
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HFR Fribourg, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland
| | - Felix Appiagyei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lucas Mose
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Christian D Fankhauser
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Osama Mohamad
- Department of Genito-urinary Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guckenberger M, Billiet C, Schnell D, Franzese C, Spałek M, Rogers S, Stelmes JJ, Aebersold DM, Hemmatazad H, Zimmermann F, Zimmer J, Zilli T, Bruni A, Baumert BG, Nägler F, Gut P, Förster R, Madani I. Dose-intensified stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful vertebral metastases: A randomized phase 3 trial. Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38581694 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this randomised study was to determine whether dose-intensified stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for painful vertebral metastases results in increased rates of pain improvement compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) (control) 6 months after treatment. METHODS This randomized, controlled phase 3 trial was conducted between November 2016 and January 2023, when it was stopped early. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older; had one or two painful, stable, or potentially unstable vertebral metastases; and had a life expectancy of 1 year or longer according to the investigator's estimates. Patients received 48.5 grays (Gy) in 10 fractions (with epidural involvement) or 40 Gy in five fractions (without epidural involvement) in the SBRT group and 30 Gy in 10 fractions or 20 Gy in five fractions in the cEBRT group, respectively. The primary end point was an improvement in the pain score at the treated site by at least 2 points (on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 points) at 6-month follow-up. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat and per-protocol basis. RESULTS Of 214 patients who were screened for eligibility, 63 were randomized 1:1 between SBRT (33 patients with 36 metastases) and cEBRT (30 patients with 31 metastases). The median age of all patients was 66 years, and 40 patients were men (63.5%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the 6-month proportion of patients who had metastases with pain reduction by 2 or more points was significantly higher in the SBRT group versus the control group (69.4% vs. 41.9%, respectively; two-sided p = .02). Changes in opioid medication intake relative to baseline were nonsignificant between the groups. No differences were observed in vertebral compression fracture or adverse event rates between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Dose-intensified SBRT improved pain score more effectively than cEBRT at 6 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Guckenberger
- University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Ciro Franzese
- Humanitas University, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mateusz Spałek
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Jean-Jacques Stelmes
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Luxemburg Health Directorate, Luxemburg, Luxemburg
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hossein Hemmatazad
- Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Jörg Zimmer
- Städtisches Klinikum Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Robert Förster
- University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Riggenbach E, Waser M, Mueller SA, Aebersold DM, Giger R, Elicin O. Oncologic outcome with versus without target volume compartmentalization in postoperative radiotherapy for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1362025. [PMID: 38590644 PMCID: PMC10999524 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1362025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The volume treated with postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is a mediator of toxicity affecting quality of life. Current guidelines only allow for very limited reduction of PORT volumes. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of de-intensified PORT for patients with OCSCC by refined compartmentalization of the treatment volume. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study identified 103 OCSCC patients treated surgically from 2014 to 2019 with a loco-regional risk profile qualifying for PORT according to guidelines. PORT was administered only to the at-risk compartment and according to a refined compartmentalization concept (CC). Oncological outcome of this CC cohort was compared to a historical cohort (HC) of 98 patients treated before the CC was implemented. Results Median follow-up time was 4.5 and 4.8 years in the CC and HC cohorts, respectively. In the CC cohort, a total of 72 of 103 patients (70%) had a pathological risk profile that allowed for further compartmentalization and, hence, received a reduced treatment volume or omission of PORT altogether. Loco-regional control at 3 and 5 years was 77% and 73% in the CC cohort versus 78% and 73% in the HC (p = 0.93), progression-free survival was 72% and 64% versus75% and 68% (p = 0.58), respectively. Similarly, no statistically significant difference was seen in other outcome measures. Conclusions De-intensified PORT limiting the treatment volume to the at-risk compartment or avoiding PORT altogether for low-risk patients with OCSCC does not seem to compromise disease control in this retrospective comparison. Based on these hypothesis-generating findings, a prospective study is being planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Riggenbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Waser
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Simon A. Mueller
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roland Giger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bertholet J, Mackeprang PH, Loebner HA, Mueller S, Guyer G, Frei D, Volken W, Elicin O, Aebersold DM, Fix MK, Manser P. Organs-at-risk dose and normal tissue complication probability with dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110237. [PMID: 38513960 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
We compared dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) to state-of-the-art volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for 46 head and neck cancer cases. DTRT had lower dose to salivary glands and swallowing structure, resulting in lower predicted xerostomia and dysphagia compared to VMAT. DTRT is deliverable on C-arm linacs with high dosimetric accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Paul-Henry Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hannes A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mohamad O, Zamboglou C, Zilli T, Murthy V, Aebersold DM, Loblaw A, Guckenberger M, Shelan M. Safety of Ultrahypofractionated Pelvic Nodal Irradiation in the Definitive Management of Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:998-1010. [PMID: 37863241 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the evidence for ultrahypofractionated pelvic nodal irradiation in patients with prostate cancer, with a focus on reported acute and late toxicities. METHODS AND MATERIALS A comprehensive search was conducted in 5 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov) from inception until March 23, 2023. Eligible publications included patients with intermediate- and high-risk and node-positive prostate cancer who underwent elective or therapeutic ultrahypofractionated pelvic nodal irradiation. Primary outcomes included the presence of grade ≥2 rates of acute and late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events or Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scales. Quality assessment was performed using National Institutes of Health tools for noncontrolled beforeand after (single arm) clinical trials, as well as single-arm observational studies. Because all outcomes were categorical variables, proportion was calculated to estimate the effect size and compare the outcomes after the intervention. RESULTS We identified 16 publications that reported the use of ultrahypofractionated radiation therapy to treat the pelvis in prostate cancer. Seven publications met our criteria and were included in the meta-analysis, including 417 patients. The median total dose to the pelvic lymph nodes was 25 Gy (range, 25-28.5 Gy), with a median of 5 fractions. The prostate received a median dose of 40 Gy (range, 35-47.5 Gy). All studies used androgen deprivation therapy for a median duration of 18 months. The median follow-up period was 3 years (range, 0.5-5.6 years). The rates of acute grade ≥2 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity were 8% (95% CI, 1%-15%) and 29% (95% CI, 18%-41%), respectively. For late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity, the rates were 13% (95% CI, 5%-21%) and 29% (95% CI, 17%-42%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Ultrahypofractionated pelvic nodal irradiation appears to be a safe approach in terms of acute and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osama Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - Uwniversity of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mohamad O, Nicosia L, Mathier E, Riggenbach E, Zamboglou C, Aebersold DM, Alongi F, Shelan M. Focal brachytherapy as definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brachytherapy 2024:S1538-4721(24)00016-3. [PMID: 38431441 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we describe the oncologic and toxicity outcomes of definitive focal brachytherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS A PROSPERO registered study (CRD42023410170) was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies between 2000 and 2022. Two authors independently performed the initial search. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) was defined as the primary endpoint for the meta-analysis. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were conducted to calculate effect size and quantify heterogeneity. We also describe the side effects and local recurrence patterns of focal brachytherapy. RESULTS Ten studies were identified and included 315 patients treated using focal brachytherapy as a definitive treatment. Mean (SD) age was 67.65 (7.9) years and mean (SD) PSA was 7.15 (2.7) ng/mL. Most patients (n = 236, 75%) underwent LDR Brachytherapy and 25% received HDR brachytherapy. Among the participants, 147 (46.5%) had a Gleason score ≤6, and 169 (53.5%) had a Gleason score ≥7. Only 11 (3.5%) patients received ADT. Overall, bRFS rate at median follow-up 4 years (Range: 1-6.42 years) was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82-95%). Acute Grade ≤ 2 GU and GI toxicities were reported in 22 (7%) and 11 (3.5%) patients, respectively. Late Grade ≤ 2 GU and GI toxicity were reported in 6 (2%) and 14 (4.4%) patients, respectively. One case of prostate hemorrhage due to improper foley removal was noted but otherwise no acute or late Grade 3 or higher GI or GU toxicity related to radiotherapy was reported. CONCLUSION Overall, definitive focal brachytherapy has a favorable toxicity profile. Oncologic outcomes are yet to mature. The evidence is limited by the small number of studies with low patients' number, across study heterogeneity, and possibility of publication bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osama Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Italy
| | - Etienne Mathier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Elena Riggenbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fillipo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Italy
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maessen M, Fliedner MC, Gahl B, Maier M, Aebersold DM, Zwahlen S, Eychmüller S. An economic evaluation of an early palliative care intervention among patients with advanced cancer. Swiss Med Wkly 2024; 154:3591. [PMID: 38579309 DOI: 10.57187/s.3591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early integration of palliative care into oncology care has shown positive effects on patient symptoms and quality of life. It may also reduce health care costs. However given the heterogeneity of settings and interventions and the lack of information on the minimally effective dose for influencing care utilisation and costs, it remains uncertain whether early palliative care reduces costs. OBJECTIVES We sought to determine whether an early palliative care intervention integrated in usual oncology care in a Swiss hospital setting reduced utilisation and costs of health care in the last month of life when compared with usual oncology care alone. METHODS We performed a cost-consequences analysis alongside a multicentre trial. We extracted costs from administrative health insurance data and health care utilisation from family caregiver surveys to compare two study arms: usual oncology care and usual oncology care plus the palliative care intervention. The intervention consisted of a single-structured, multiprofessional conversation with the patient about symptoms, end-of-life decisions, network building and support for carers (SENS). The early palliative care intervention was performed within 16 weeks of the diagnosis of a tumour stage not amenable or responsive to curative treatment. RESULTS We included 58 participants with advanced cancer in our economic evaluation study. Median overall health care costs in the last month of life were 7892 Swiss Francs (CHF) (interquartile range: CHF 5637-13,489) in the intervention arm and CHF 8492 [CHF 5411-12,012] in the control arm. The average total intervention treatment cost CHF 380 per patient. Integrating an early palliative care intervention into usual oncology care showed no significant difference in health care utilisation or overall health care costs between intervention and control arms (p = 0.98). CONCLUSION Although early palliative care is often presented as a cost-reducing care service, we could not show a significant effect of the SENS intervention on health care utilisation and costs in the last month of life. However, it may be that the intervention was not intensive enough, the timeframe too short or the study population too small for measurable effects. Patients appreciated the intervention. Single-structured early palliative care interventions are easy to implement in clinical practice and present low treatment costs. Further research about the economic impact of early palliative care should focus on extracting large, detailed cost databases showing potential shifts in cost and cost-effectiveness. CLINICAL TRIALS gov Identifier: NCT01983956.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maud Maessen
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland
- University Centre for Palliative Care, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Monica C Fliedner
- University Centre for Palliative Care, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Marina Maier
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Susanne Zwahlen
- Unit for Specialised Palliative Care, Lindenhof Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Steffen Eychmüller
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland
- University Centre for Palliative Care, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Windisch P, Becker I, Tang H, Schröder C, Buchali A, Aebersold DM, Zwahlen DR, Förster R, Shelan M. Converting between the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) urinary subscales: modeling and external validation. BMC Urol 2024; 24:28. [PMID: 38310268 PMCID: PMC10837947 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01421-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-related quality of life can be assessed with a variety of different questionnaires. The 50-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) are two widely used options. The goal of this study was, therefore, to develop and validate a model that is able to convert between the EPIC and the IPSS to enable comparisons across different studies. METHODS Three hundred forty-seven consecutive patients who had previously received radiotherapy and surgery for prostate cancer at two institutions in Switzerland and Germany were contacted via mail and instructed to complete both questionnaires. The Swiss cohort was used to train and internally validate different machine learning models using fourfold cross-validation. The German cohort was used for external validation. RESULTS Converting between the EPIC Urinary Irritative/Obstructive subscale and the IPSS using linear regressions resulted in mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 3.88 and 6.12, which is below the respective previously published minimal important differences (MIDs) of 5.2 and 10 points. Converting between the EPIC Urinary Summary and the IPSS was less accurate with MAEs of 5.13 and 10.45, similar to the MIDs. More complex model architectures did not result in improved performance in this study. The study was limited to the German versions of the respective questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS Linear regressions can be used to convert between the IPSS and the EPIC Urinary subscales. While the equations obtained in this study can be used to compare results across clinical trials, they should not be used to inform clinical decision-making in individual patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov on January 14th, 2022, under the registration number NCT05192876.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Windisch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, Haus R, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland.
| | - Ivo Becker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hongjian Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, Haus R, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Christina Schröder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, Haus R, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - André Buchali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel R Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, Haus R, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Robert Förster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, Haus R, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bertholet J, Zhu C, Guyer G, Mueller S, Volken W, Mackeprang PH, Loebner HA, Stampanoni MFM, Aebersold DM, Fix MK, Manser P. Dosimetrically motivated beam-angle optimization for non-coplanar arc radiotherapy with and without dynamic collimator rotation. Med Phys 2024; 51:1326-1339. [PMID: 38131614 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-coplanar techniques have shown to improve the achievable dose distribution compared to standard coplanar techniques for multiple treatment sites but finding optimal beam directions is challenging. Dynamic collimator trajectory radiotherapy (colli-DTRT) is a new intensity modulated radiotherapy technique that uses non-coplanar partial arcs and dynamic collimator rotation. PURPOSE To solve the beam angle optimization (BAO) problem for colli-DTRT and non-coplanar VMAT (NC-VMAT) by determining the table-angle and the gantry-angle ranges of the partial arcs through iterative 4π fluence map optimization (FMO) and beam direction elimination. METHODS BAO considers all available beam directions sampled on a gantry-table map with the collimator angle aligned to the superior-inferior axis (colli-DTRT) or static (NC-VMAT). First, FMO is performed, and beam directions are scored based on their contributions to the objective function. The map is thresholded to remove the least contributing beam directions, and arc candidates are formed by adjacent beam directions with the same table angle. Next, FMO and arc candidate trimming, based on objective function penalty score, is performed iteratively until a desired total gantry angle range is reached. Direct aperture optimization on the final set of colli-DTRT or NC-VMAT arcs generates deliverable plans. colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT plans were created for seven clinically-motivated cases with targets in the head and neck (two cases), brain, esophagus, lung, breast, and prostate. colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT were compared to coplanar VMAT plans as well as to class-solution non-coplanar VMAT plans for the brain and head and neck cases. Dosimetric validation was performed for one colli-DTRT (head and neck) and one NC-VMAT (breast) plan using film measurements. RESULTS Target coverage and conformity was similar for all techniques. colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT plans had improved dosimetric performance compared to coplanar VMAT for all treatment sites except prostate where all techniques were equivalent. For the head and neck and brain cases, mean dose reduction-in percentage of the prescription dose-to parallel organs was on average 0.7% (colli-DTRT), 0.8% (NC-VMAT) and 0.4% (class-solution) compared to VMAT. The reduction in D2% for the serial organs was on average 1.7% (colli-DTRT), 2.0% (NC-VMAT) and 0.9% (class-solution). For the esophagus, lung, and breast cases, mean dose reduction to parallel organs was on average 0.2% (colli-DTRT) and 0.3% (NC-VMAT) compared to VMAT. The reduction in D2% for the serial organs was on average 1.3% (colli-DTRT) and 0.9% (NC-VMAT). Estimated delivery times for colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT were below 4 min for a full gantry angle range of 720°, including transitions between arcs, except for the brain case where multiple arcs covered the whole table angle range. These times are in the same order as the class-solution for the head and neck and brain cases. Total optimization times were 25%-107% longer for colli-DTRT, including BAO, compared to VMAT. CONCLUSIONS We successfully developed dosimetrically motivated BAO for colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT treatment planning. colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT are applicable to multiple treatment sites, including body sites, with beneficial or equivalent dosimetric performances compared to coplanar VMAT and reasonable delivery times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Chengchen Zhu
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul-Henry Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hannes A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mathier E, Althaus A, Zwahlen D, Lustenberger J, Zamboglou C, De Bari B, Aebersold DM, Guckenberger M, Zilli T, Shelan M. HypoFocal SRT Trial: Ultra-hypofractionated focal salvage radiotherapy for isolated prostate bed recurrence after radical prostatectomy; single-arm phase II study; clinical trial protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e075846. [PMID: 38296279 PMCID: PMC10828884 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) being established treatments for localised prostate cancer, a significant number of patients experience recurrent disease. While conventionally fractionated RT is still being used as a standard treatment in the postoperative setting, ultra-hypofractionated RT has emerged as a viable option with encouraging results in patients with localised disease in the primary setting. In addition, recent technological advancements in RT delivery and precise definition of isolated macroscopic recurrence within the prostate bed using prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) allow the exploration of ultra-hypofractionated schedules in the salvage setting using five fractions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS In this single-arm prospective phase II multicentre trial, 36 patients with node-negative prostate adenocarcinoma treated with RP at least 6 months before trial registration, tumour stage pT2a-3b, R0-1, pN0 or cN0 according to the UICC TNM 2009 and evidence of measurable local recurrence within the prostate bed detected by PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI within the last 3 months, will be included. The patients will undergo focal ultra-hypofractionated salvage RT with 34 Gy in five fractions every other day to the site of local recurrence in combination with 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. The primary outcome of this study is biochemical relapse-free survival at 2 years. Secondary outcomes include acute side effects (until 90 days after the end of RT) of grade 3 or higher based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.5, progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival, late side effects and the quality of life (based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30, QLQ-PR25). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has received ethical approval from the Ethics Commission of the Canton of Bern (KEK-BE 2022-01026). Academic dissemination will occur through publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05746806.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etienne Mathier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Althaus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Jens Lustenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Berardino De Bari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Réseau hospitalier neuchâtelois, Neuchatel, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncological Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Adebahr S, Althaus A, Scharl S, Strouthos I, Farolfi A, Serani F, Lanzafame H, Trapp C, Koerber SA, Peeken JC, Vogel MME, Vrachimis A, Spohn SKB, Grosu AL, Kroeze SGC, Guckenberger M, Fanti S, Hruby G, Emmett L, Belka C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Henkenberens C, Aebersold DM, Wiegel T, Afshar-Oromieh A, Zamboglou C, Shelan M. The prognostic significance of a negative PSMA-PET scan prior to salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:558-567. [PMID: 37736808 PMCID: PMC10774185 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06438-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
AIM The optimal management for early recurrent prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with negative prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography (PSMA-PET) scan is an ongoing subject of debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with biochemical recurrence with negative PSMA PET finding. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter (11 centers, 5 countries) analysis included patients who underwent SRT following biochemical recurrence (BR) of PC after RP without evidence of disease on PSMA-PET staging. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), metastatic-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression assessed predefined predictors of survival outcomes. RESULTS Three hundred patients were included, 253 (84.3%) received SRT to the prostate bed only, 46 (15.3%) additional elective pelvic nodal irradiation, respectively. Only 41 patients (13.7%) received concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Median follow-up after SRT was 33 months (IQR: 20-46 months). Three-year bRFS, MFS, and OS following SRT were 73.9%, 87.8%, and 99.1%, respectively. Three-year bRFS was 77.5% and 48.3% for patients with PSA levels before PSMA-PET ≤ 0.5 ng/ml and > 0.5 ng/ml, respectively. Using univariate analysis, the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade > 2 (p = 0.006), metastatic pelvic lymph nodes at surgery (p = 0.032), seminal vesicle involvement (p < 0.001), pre-SRT PSA level of > 0.5 ng/ml (p = 0.004), and lack of concomitant ADT (p = 0.023) were significantly associated with worse bRFS. On multivariate Cox proportional hazards, seminal vesicle infiltration (p = 0.007), ISUP score >2 (p = 0.048), and pre SRT PSA level > 0.5 ng/ml (p = 0.013) remained significantly associated with worse bRFS. CONCLUSION Favorable bRFS after SRT in patients with BR and negative PSMA-PET following RP was achieved. These data support the usage of early SRT for patients with negative PSMA-PET findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site DKTK-Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Althaus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sophia Scharl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Serani
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Helena Lanzafame
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexis Vrachimis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
- C.A.R.I.C. Cancer Research & Innovation Center, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site DKTK-Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site DKTK-Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Canton Hospital of Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital - University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hanover, Germany
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site DKTK-Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Loebner HA, Mueller S, Volken W, Wallimann P, Aebersold DM, Stampanoni MFM, Fix MK, Manser P. Impact of the gradient in gantry-table rotation on dynamic trajectory radiotherapy plan quality. Med Phys 2023; 50:7104-7117. [PMID: 37748175 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To improve organ at risk (OAR) sparing, dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) extends VMAT by dynamic table and collimator rotation during beam-on. However, comprehensive investigations regarding the impact of the gantry-table (GT) rotation gradient on the DTRT plan quality have not been conducted. PURPOSE To investigate the impact of a user-defined GT rotation gradient on plan quality of DTRT plans in terms of dosimetric plan quality, dosimetric robustness, deliverability, and delivery time. METHODS The dynamic trajectories of DTRT are described by GT and gantry-collimator paths. The GT path is determined by minimizing the overlap of OARs with planning target volume (PTV). This approach is extended to consider a GT rotation gradient by means of a maximum gradient of the path (G m a x ${G}_{max}$ ) between two adjacent control points (G = | Δ table angle / Δ gantry angle | $G = | \Delta {{\mathrm{table\ angle}}/\Delta {\mathrm{gantry\ angle}}} |$ ) and maximum absolute change of G (Δ G m a x ${{\Delta}}{G}_{max}$ ). Four DTRT plans are created with different maximum G&∆G:G m a x ${G}_{max}$ &Δ G m a x ${{\Delta}}{G}_{max}$ = 0.5&0.125 (DTRT-1), 1&0.125 (DTRT-2), 3&0.125 (DTRT-3) and 3&1(DTRT-4), including 3-4 dynamic trajectories, for three clinically motivated cases in the head and neck and brain region (A, B, and C). A reference VMAT plan for each case is created. For all plans, plan quality is assessed and compared. Dosimetric plan quality is evaluated by target coverage, conformity, and OAR sparing. Dosimetric robustness is evaluated against systematic and random patient-setup uncertainties between± 3 mm $ \pm 3\ {\mathrm{mm}}$ in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions, and machine uncertainties between± 4 ∘ $ \pm 4^\circ \ $ in the dynamically rotating machine components (gantry, table, collimator rotation). Delivery time is recorded. Deliverability and delivery accuracy on a TrueBeam are assessed by logfile analysis for all plans and additionally verified by film measurements for one case. All dose calculations are Monte Carlo based. RESULTS The extension of the DTRT planning process with user-definedG m a x & Δ G m a x ${G}_{max}\& {{\Delta}}{G}_{max}$ to investigate the impact of the GT rotation gradient on plan quality is successfully demonstrated. With increasingG m a x & Δ G m a x ${G}_{max}\& {{\Delta}}{G}_{max}$ , slight (case C,D m e a n , p a r o t i d l . ${D}_{mean,\ parotid\ l.}$ : up to-1Gy) and substantial (case A,D 0.03 c m 3 , o p t i c n e r v e r . ${D}_{0.03c{m}^3,\ optic\ nerve\ r.}$ : up to -9.3 Gy, caseB,D m e a n , b r a i n $\ {D}_{mean,\ brain}$ : up to -4.7Gy) improvements in OAR sparing are observed compared to VMAT, while maintaining similar target coverage. All plans are delivered on the TrueBeam. Expected and actual machine position values recorded in the logfiles deviated by <0.2° for gantry, table and collimator rotation. The film measurements agreed by >96% (2%global/2 mm Gamma passing rate) with the dose calculation. With increasingG m a x & Δ G m a x ${G}_{max}\& {{\Delta}}{G}_{max}$ , delivery time is prolonged by <2 min/trajectory (DTRT-4) compared to VMAT and DTRT-1. The DTRT plans for case A and B and the VMAT plan for case C plan reveal the best dosimetric robustness for the considered uncertainties. CONCLUSION The impact of the GT rotation gradient on DTRT plan quality is comprehensively investigated for three cases in the head and neck and brain region. Increasing freedom in this gradient improves dosimetric plan quality at the cost of increased delivery time for the investigated cases. No clear dependency of GT rotation gradient on dosimetric robustness is observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannes A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Wallimann
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Guyer G, Mueller S, Mackeprang PH, Frei D, Volken W, Aebersold DM, Loessl K, Manser P, Fix MK. Delivery time reduction for mixed photon-electron radiotherapy by using photon MLC collimated electron arcs. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:215009. [PMID: 37816376 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad021a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Electron arcs in mixed-beam radiotherapy (Arc-MBRT) consisting of intensity-modulated electron arcs with dynamic gantry rotation potentially reduce the delivery time compared to mixed-beam radiotherapy containing electron beams with static gantry angle (Static-MBRT). This study aims to develop and investigate a treatment planning process (TPP) for photon multileaf collimator (pMLC) based Arc-MBRT.Approach. An existing TPP for Static-MBRT plans is extended to integrate electron arcs with a dynamic gantry rotation and intensity modulation using a sliding window technique. The TPP consists of a manual setup of electron arcs, and either static photon beams or photon arcs, shortening of the source-to-surface distance for the electron arcs, initial intensity modulation optimization, selection of a user-defined number of electron beam energies based on dose contribution to the target volume and finally, simultaneous photon and electron intensity modulation optimization followed by full Monte Carlo dose calculation. Arc-MBRT plans, Static-MBRT plans, and photon-only plans were created and compared for four breast cases. Dosimetric validation of two Arc-MBRT plans was performed using film measurements.Main results. The generated Arc-MBRT plans are dosimetrically similar to the Static-MBRT plans while outperforming the photon-only plans. The mean heart dose is reduced by 32% on average in the MBRT plans compared to the photon-only plans. The estimated delivery times of the Arc-MBRT plans are similar to the photon-only plans but less than half the time of the Static-MBRT plans. Measured and calculated dose distributions agree with a gamma passing rate of over 98% (3% global, 2 mm) for both delivered Arc-MBRT plans.Significance. A TPP for Arc-MBRT is successfully developed and Arc-MBRT plans showed the potential to improve the dosimetric plan quality similar as Static-MBRT while maintaining short delivery times of photon-only treatments. This further facilitates integration of pMLC-based MBRT into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul-Henry Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Loessl
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bertholet J, Mackeprang PH, Loebner HA, Mueller S, Guyer G, Frei D, Volken W, Elicin O, Aebersold DM, Fix MK, Manser P. Comparison of Dynamic Trajectory Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Loco-Regionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e644. [PMID: 37785917 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) extends volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with dynamic table and collimator rotation. We investigate the potential benefit of DTRT over VMAT with respect to organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing for patients with loco-regionally advanced oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). MATERIALS/METHODS We created DTRT and VMAT plans for 46 cases with prescribed doses of 50-70 Gy (2 Gy fractions, sequential boost) using 6 MV flattened beam on c-arm Linacs. For DTRT: case-specific collision avoidance maps were created and gantry-table paths were determined based on contoured structures to minimize fractional target/OAR overlap in beam's eye view. Gantry-collimator paths minimized field width in the leaf-travel direction. DTRT paths were imported in a research version of a commercial treatment planning system for intensity modulation optimization using the same optimizer and dose calculation algorithms as for VMAT. Plans at each dose level were normalized with 100% of the prescribed dose to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV). PTV coverage and OAR sparing for DTRT and VMAT were compared using Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank test (5% significance level). The correlation between the fractional OAR/PTV50Gy volume overlap and difference in OAR Dmean between the two techniques was evaluated using Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS Plans at each dose level were all acceptable and had D0.03cc<110% prescription dose (difference between DTRT and VMAT were not statistically significant). In the combined plans, PTV50Gy D95% and D98% and PTV70Gy D95% were significantly higher with DTRT compared to VMAT. Differences in PTV66Gy coverage and PTV70Gy D5% were not statistically significant. Mean Dmean to the contralateral (CL) parotid gland was 13.99 / 15.28 Gy for DTRT / VMAT respectively, it was 25.75 / 28.05 Gy for the CL submandibular gland, 44.88 / 45.82 Gy for the pharynx and 30.90 / 33.93 Gy for the oral cavity (all with p<.001). Mean Dmean to the ipsilateral (IL) parotid gland was 29.00 / 29.28 Gy for DTRT / VMAT respectively (p = .77) and 57.71 / 57.91 Gy for the IL submandibular gland (p = .99). Significantly higher doses were observed with DTRT than with VMAT for the optical and auditory OARs and for the brain, but well below the clinical goals. The difference in Dmean (VMAT-DTRT) was negatively correlated to the fractional OAR/PTV50Gy overlap for the CL parotid and submandibular gland and the IL submandibular gland (r = -0.55 to -0.51, p<.001) but not for IL parotid gland (r = -0.17, p = .26), oral cavity (r = -0.13, p = .41) or pharynx (r = -011, p = .47). CONCLUSION For at least the same target coverage, DTRT statistically significantly improves sparing for OARs related to salivary and swallowing functions compared to state-of-the-art VMAT. The advantage of DTRT decreases with increasing fractional OAR/PTV50Gy volume overlap for some salivary glands but not for pharynx or oral cavity. DTRT is promising to reduce treatment-related toxicity for patients with OPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - P H Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - H A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - S Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - G Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - W Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - O Elicin
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - M K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - P Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Poel R, Kamath AJ, Willmann J, Andratschke N, Ermiş E, Aebersold DM, Manser P, Reyes M. Deep-Learning-Based Dose Predictor for Glioblastoma-Assessing the Sensitivity and Robustness for Dose Awareness in Contouring. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4226. [PMID: 37686501 PMCID: PMC10486555 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
External beam radiation therapy requires a sophisticated and laborious planning procedure. To improve the efficiency and quality of this procedure, machine-learning models that predict these dose distributions were introduced. The most recent dose prediction models are based on deep-learning architectures called 3D U-Nets that give good approximations of the dose in 3D almost instantly. Our purpose was to train such a 3D dose prediction model for glioblastoma VMAT treatment and test its robustness and sensitivity for the purpose of quality assurance of automatic contouring. From a cohort of 125 glioblastoma (GBM) patients, VMAT plans were created according to a clinical protocol. The initial model was trained on a cascaded 3D U-Net. A total of 60 cases were used for training, 15 for validation and 20 for testing. The prediction model was tested for sensitivity to dose changes when subject to realistic contour variations. Additionally, the model was tested for robustness by exposing it to a worst-case test set containing out-of-distribution cases. The initially trained prediction model had a dose score of 0.94 Gy and a mean DVH (dose volume histograms) score for all structures of 1.95 Gy. In terms of sensitivity, the model was able to predict the dose changes that occurred due to the contour variations with a mean error of 1.38 Gy. We obtained a 3D VMAT dose prediction model for GBM with limited data, providing good sensitivity to realistic contour variations. We tested and improved the model's robustness by targeted updates to the training set, making it a useful technique for introducing dose awareness in the contouring evaluation and quality assurance process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Poel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Amith J. Kamath
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jonas Willmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ekin Ermiş
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mauricio Reyes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shelan M, Anschuetz L, Schubert A, Bojaxhiu B, Aebersold DM, Elicin O, Giger R. Superior loco-regional control after primary surgery compared to chemo-radiotherapy for advanced stage laryngeal cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1132486. [PMID: 37593093 PMCID: PMC10431594 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1132486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The optimal strategy to treat loco-regionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (LSCC) remains to be defined. The goal of this single institution retrospective study was to report on oncologic outcome of advanced LSCC treated with curative intent. Methods Patients diagnosed and treated for stage T3-T4a LSCC between 2001 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Time-to-event endpoints were calculated beginning from the date of histologic diagnosis, which were analyzed with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models. Results The cohort was divided into two subgroups: primary radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin (CRT) (n=30, 38%) and primary surgery (n=48, 62%). Median follow-up was 56 months. Locoregional control (LRC) for the primary surgery and CRT were 95% and 50% in 5 years, respectively (p<0.01). Progression free survival (PFS) for the primary surgery and CRT were 61% and 38% in 5 years, respectively (p=0.23). The overall survival (OS) after primary surgery and CRT in 5 years were 63% vs. 65%, respectively (p=0.93). The 5-years LRC was significantly superior after surgery compared to RT for cT3 primaries (100% vs 50%, p= 0.0022). No significant differences were observed in the remaining subgroups regarding cT stage and PFS or OS. Conclusion Our series demonstrated superior LRC after primary surgery followed by risk-adapted adjuvant (C)RT compared to primary CRT in cT3 LSCC, but no significant difference in PFS or OS in locally-advanced LSCC. The optimal patient selection criteria for the ideal treatment for loco-regionally advanced LSCC still needs to be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Anschuetz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Schubert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Beat Bojaxhiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roland Giger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Koch JP, Roth SM, Quintin A, Gavini J, Orlando E, Riedo R, Pozzato C, Hayrapetyan L, Aebersold R, Stroka DM, Aebersold DM, Medo M, Zimmer Y, Medová M. A DNA-PK phosphorylation site on MET regulates its signaling interface with the DNA damage response. Oncogene 2023; 42:2113-2125. [PMID: 37188738 PMCID: PMC10289896 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-023-02714-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
The DNA damage response (DDR) is intertwined with signaling pathways downstream of oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). To drive research into the application of targeted therapies as radiosensitizers, a better understanding of this molecular crosstalk is necessary. We present here the characterization of a previously unreported MET RTK phosphosite, Serine 1016 (S1016) that represents a potential DDR-MET interface. MET S1016 phosphorylation increases in response to irradiation and is mainly targeted by DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). Phosphoproteomics unveils an impact of the S1016A substitution on the overall long-term cell cycle regulation following DNA damage. Accordingly, the abrogation of this phosphosite strongly perturbs the phosphorylation of proteins involved in the cell cycle and formation of the mitotic spindle, enabling cells to bypass a G2 arrest upon irradiation and leading to the entry into mitosis despite compromised genome integrity. This results in the formation of abnormal mitotic spindles and a lower proliferation rate. Altogether, the current data uncover a novel signaling mechanism through which the DDR uses a growth factor receptor system for regulating and maintaining genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas P Koch
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Selina M Roth
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Aurélie Quintin
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jacopo Gavini
- Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, Visceral Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Eleonora Orlando
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Rahel Riedo
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Chiara Pozzato
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Liana Hayrapetyan
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ruedi Aebersold
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, 8093, Zürich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Science, University of Zürich, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Deborah M Stroka
- Department for BioMedical Research, Visceral Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matúš Medo
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Yitzhak Zimmer
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michaela Medová
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hovhannisyan L, Riether C, Aebersold DM, Medová M, Zimmer Y. CAR T cell-based immunotherapy and radiation therapy: potential, promises and risks. Mol Cancer 2023; 22:82. [PMID: 37173782 PMCID: PMC10176707 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-023-01775-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
CAR T cell-based therapies have revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies such as leukemia and lymphoma within the last years. In contrast to the success in hematological cancers, the treatment of solid tumors with CAR T cells is still a major challenge in the field and attempts to overcome these hurdles have not been successful yet. Radiation therapy is used for management of various malignancies for decades and its therapeutic role ranges from local therapy to a priming agent in cancer immunotherapy. Combinations of radiation with immune checkpoint inhibitors have already proven successful in clinical trials. Therefore, a combination of radiation therapy may have the potential to overcome the current limitations of CAR T cell therapy in solid tumor entities. So far, only limited research was conducted in the area of CAR T cells and radiation. In this review we will discuss the potential and risks of such a combination in the treatment of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lusine Hovhannisyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, Bern, 3008, Switzerland
- Department for Biomedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, Bern, 3008, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, 3010, Switzerland
| | - Carsten Riether
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, 3010, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, Bern, 3008, Switzerland
- Department for Biomedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, Bern, 3008, Switzerland
| | - Michaela Medová
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, Bern, 3008, Switzerland
- Department for Biomedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, Bern, 3008, Switzerland
| | - Yitzhak Zimmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, Bern, 3008, Switzerland.
- Department for Biomedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, Bern, 3008, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Scharl S, Zamboglou C, Strouthos I, Farolfi A, Serani F, Lanzafame H, Giuseppe Morganti A, Trapp C, Koerber SA, Debus J, Peeken JC, Vogel MME, Vrachimis A, K B Spohn S, Ruf J, Grosu AL, Ceci F, Fendler WP, Bartenstein P, Kroeze SGC, Guckenberger M, Krafcsik M, Klopscheck C, Fanti S, Hruby G, Emmett L, Belka C, Stief C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Henkenberens C, Mayer B, Miksch J, Shelan M, Aebersold DM, Thamm R, Wiegel T. Salvage radiotherapy is effective in patients with PSMA-PET-negative biochemical recurrence- results of a retrospective study. Radiother Oncol 2023; 184:109678. [PMID: 37146766 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND /Purpose: The present study aimed to assess whether SRT to the prostatic fossa should be initiated in a timely manner after detecting biochemical recurrence (BR) in patients with prostate cancer, when no correlate was identified with prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective, multicenter analysis included 1222 patients referred for PSMA-PET after a radical prostatectomy due to BR. Exclusion criteria were: pathological lymph node metastases, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence, distant or lymph node metastases, nodal irradiation, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). This led to a cohort of 341 patients. Biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) was the primary study endpoint. RESULTS The median follow-up was 28.0 months. The 3-year BPFS was 71.6% in PET-negative cases and 80.8% in locally PET-positive cases. This difference was significant in univariate (p=0.019), but not multivariate analyses (p=0.366, HR: 1.46, 95%CI: 0.64-3.32). The 3-year BPFS in PET-negative cases was significantly influenced by age (p=0.005), initial pT3/4 (p<0.001), pathology scores (ISUP) ≥3 (p=0.026), and doses to fossa >70 Gy (p=0.027) in univariate analyses. In multivariate analyses, only age (HR: 1.096, 95%CI: 1.023-1.175, p=0.009) and PSA-doubling time (HR: 0.339, 95%CI: 0.139-0.826, p=0.017) remained significant. CONCLUSION To our best knowledge, this study provided the largest SRT analysis in patients without ADT that were lymph node-negative on PSMA-PET. A multivariate analysis showed no significant difference in BPFS between locally PET-positive and PET-negative cases. These results supported the current EAU recommendation to initiate SRT in a timely manner after detecting BR in PET negative patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Scharl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany; Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Serani
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Helena Lanzafame
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital - University of Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Alexis Vrachimis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus; C.A.R.I.C. Cancer Research & Innovation Center, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany; Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany; Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Canton Hospital of Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - Manuel Krafcsik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital - University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney Australia
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Benjamin Mayer
- Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Jonathan Miksch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Reinhard Thamm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zamboglou C, Peeken JC, Janbain A, Katsahian S, Strouthos I, Ferentinos K, Farolfi A, Koerber SA, Debus J, Vogel ME, Combs SE, Vrachimis A, Morganti AG, Spohn SKB, Shelan M, Aebersold DM, Grosu AL, Ceci F, Henkenberens C, Kroeze SGC, Guckenberger M, Fanti S, Belka C, Bartenstein P, Hruby G, Scharl S, Wiegel T, Emmett L, Arnoux A, Schmidt-Hegemann NS. Development and Validation of a Multi-institutional Nomogram of Outcomes for PSMA-PET-Based Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2314748. [PMID: 37219907 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Prostate-specific antigen membrane positron-emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is increasingly used to guide salvage radiotherapy (sRT) after radical prostatectomy for patients with recurrent or persistent prostate cancer. Objective To develop and validate a nomogram for prediction of freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) after PSMA-PET-based sRT. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included 1029 patients with prostate cancer treated between July 1, 2013, and June 30, 2020, at 11 centers from 5 countries. The initial database consisted of 1221 patients. All patients had a PSMA-PET scan prior to sRT. Data were analyzed in November 2022. Exposures Patients with a detectable post-radical prostatectomy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level treated with sRT to the prostatic fossa with or without additional sRT to pelvic lymphatics or concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were eligible. Main Outcomes and Measures The FFBF rate was estimated, and a predictive nomogram was generated and validated. Biochemical relapse was defined as a PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL after sRT. Results In the nomogram creation and validation process, 1029 patients (median age at sRT, 70 years [IQR, 64-74 years]) were included and further divided into a training set (n = 708), internal validation set (n = 271), and external outlier validation set (n = 50). The median follow-up was 32 months (IQR, 21-45 months). Based on the PSMA-PET scan prior to sRT, 437 patients (42.5%) had local recurrences and 313 patients (30.4%) had nodal recurrences. Pelvic lymphatics were electively irradiated for 395 patients (38.4%). All patients received sRT to the prostatic fossa: 103 (10.0%) received a dose of less than 66 Gy, 551 (53.5%) received a dose of 66 to 70 Gy, and 375 (36.5%) received a dose of more than 70 Gy. Androgen deprivation therapy was given to 325 (31.6%) patients. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, pre-sRT PSA level (hazard ratio [HR], 1.80 [95% CI, 1.41-2.31]), International Society of Urological Pathology grade in surgery specimen (grade 5 vs 1+2: HR, 2.39 [95% CI, 1.63-3.50], pT stage (pT3b+pT4 vs pT2: HR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.39-2.67]), surgical margins (R0 vs R1+R2+Rx: HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.48-0.78]), ADT use (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.37-0.65]), sRT dose (>70 vs ≤66 Gy: HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.29-0.67]), and nodal recurrence detected on PSMA-PET scans (HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.09-1.85]) were associated with FFBF. The mean (SD) nomogram concordance index for FFBF was 0.72 (0.06) for the internal validation cohort and 0.67 (0.11) in the external outlier validation cohort. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study of patients with prostate cancer presents an internally and externally validated nomogram that estimated individual patient outcomes after PSMA-PET-guided sRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ali Janbain
- Cité University, AP-HP, European Hospital Georges-Pompidou, Clinical research unit, Clinical Investigation Center 1418 Clinical Epidemiology, INSERM, INRIA, HeKA, Paris, France
| | - Sandrine Katsahian
- Cité University, AP-HP, European Hospital Georges-Pompidou, Clinical research unit, Clinical Investigation Center 1418 Clinical Epidemiology, INSERM, INRIA, HeKA, Paris, France
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marco E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexis Vrachimis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
- C.A.R.I.C. Cancer Research & Innovation Center, Limassol, Cyprus
| | | | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital-University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sophia Scharl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Armelle Arnoux
- Cité University, AP-HP, European Hospital Georges-Pompidou, Clinical research unit, Clinical Investigation Center 1418 Clinical Epidemiology, INSERM, INRIA, HeKA, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Orlando E, Medo M, Bensimon A, Quintin A, Riedo R, Roth SM, Riether C, Marti TM, Aebersold DM, Medová M, Aebersold R, Zimmer Y. Correction: An oncogene addiction phosphorylation signature and its derived scores inform tumor responsiveness to targeted therapies. Cell Mol Life Sci 2023; 80:85. [PMID: 36894640 PMCID: PMC9998563 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-023-04725-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Orlando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, MEM-E807, Murtenstrasse 35, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matúš Medo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, MEM-E807, Murtenstrasse 35, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ariel Bensimon
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, HPM H25, Otto-Stern-Weg 3, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Aurélie Quintin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, MEM-E807, Murtenstrasse 35, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Rahel Riedo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, MEM-E807, Murtenstrasse 35, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Selina M Roth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, MEM-E807, Murtenstrasse 35, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carsten Riether
- Tumorimmunology, Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, University Hospital and University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M Marti
- Thoracic Surgery, Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, MEM-E807, Murtenstrasse 35, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michaela Medová
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, MEM-E807, Murtenstrasse 35, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ruedi Aebersold
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, HPM H25, Otto-Stern-Weg 3, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Faculty of Science, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Yitzhak Zimmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
- Department for BioMedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, MEM-E807, Murtenstrasse 35, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dal Pra A, Supiot S, Gysel K, Zilli T, Cathomas R, Reynaud T, Pommier P, Putora PM, Bosetti DG, Guckenberger M, Hildebrandt G, Chiquet S, Brihoum M, Papachristofilou A, Hayoz S, Ghadjar P, Zwahlen DR, Gillessen S, Omlin AG, Aebersold DM. Phase 2, multicenter, randomized study of salvage radiation therapy +/- metformin for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (SAKK 08/15 – GETUG-AFU 34 PROMET trial). J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
353 Background: Pre-clinical and retrospective clinical data support an interaction of metformin (MET) and radiotherapy. Thus, MET may represent a cost-effective means to improve radiotherapy outcomes. We sought to investigate whether MET increases time to progression (TTP) when combined with salvage radiation therapy (SRT) in men with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: Non-diabetic men with biochemical recurrence after RP were enrolled into an open label, randomized, phase 2 study in 17 hospitals in Switzerland, France, and Germany. The randomization (1:1) was stratified by Gleason score (<8 vs ≥8), surgical margin status (R0 vs R1), PSA at randomization (PSA > 0.5 vs ≤ 0.5 ng/mL), ADT use, and evidence of local recurrence. Following randomization, patients received either prostate bed SRT (70Gy) or prostate bed SRT (70Gy) + MET. MET 850mg PO QD was given for 4 weeks before SRT, then 850mg PO QD for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was TTP. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, undetectable PSA under normal testosterone levels, 50% PSA response, clinical progression-free survival, time to further systemic therapy, prostate cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and adverse events (AE). The trial design was powered for a HR 0.65 with planned enrollment of 170 patients. The trial was prematurely closed by the sponsor due to financial reasons. Data is reported after patients reached a minimum follow-up of 12 months after SRT and corresponds to the final analysis. Results: A total of 111 patients were randomized (106 evaluable) between 10/2017 and 11/2020. The median PSA at randomization was 0.3 ng/mL (range, 0.03-1.5 ng/mL), 19 patients (17.9%) had Gleason ≥8, 54 (50.9%) pT3 disease, and 50 (47.2%) positive surgical margins. Twenty-four patients (22.6%) used short-term ADT. Trial arms were well balanced. At a median follow-up of 27.1 months (95% CI: 26.7-27.8), a total of 16 progression events occurred. The median TTP was not reached in either treatment arm. The hazard ratio adjusted by stratification factors was 1.25 (95% CI: 0.40-3.94; one-sided 80% CI: 2.05; log-rank p=0.62). Two-year TTP was 89% (95% CI: 76%-96%) in the SRT arm vs 82% (95% CI: 67%-91%) in the SRT + MET arm. No statistically significant differences were found for the secondary endpoints. Most common AE during treatment was grade 1-2 diarrhea (24.1% SRT vs 54.6% SRT + MET). Grade 2 and 3 AE (gastrointestinal and/or urinary) were 25.9% and 3.7% with SRT vs 34.5% and 7.3% with SRT + MET (p=0.41 and p=0.68), respectively. Conclusions: Adding MET to SRT did not result in a significant improvement in TTP in non-diabetic men with recurrent prostate cancer post-RP. Because of early trial closure and fewer than expected events, the trial may have been underpowered for this endpoint. Additional correlative studies will be pursued. Clinical trial information: NCT02945813 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephane Supiot
- Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest-Rene Gauducheau, Nantes, France
| | - Katrin Gysel
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Division of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubunden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Reynaud
- Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, Saint Etienne, France
| | - Pascal Pommier
- Centre de lutte contre le cancer Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | - Guido Hildebrandt
- Universitatsmedizin Rostock, Klinic und Poliklinic, Rostock, Germany
| | - Sabrina Chiquet
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Stefanie Hayoz
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mueller S, Guyer G, Volken W, Frei D, Torelli N, Aebersold DM, Manser P, Fix MK. Efficiency enhancements of a Monte Carlo beamlet based treatment planning process: implementation and parameter study. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68. [PMID: 36655485 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acb480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Objective.The computational effort to perform beamlet calculation, plan optimization and final dose calculation of a treatment planning process (TPP) generating intensity modulated treatment plans is enormous, especially if Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are used for dose calculation. The goal of this work is to improve the computational efficiency of a fully MC based TPP for static and dynamic photon, electron and mixed photon-electron treatment techniques by implementing multiple methods and studying the influence of their parameters.Approach.A framework is implemented calculating MC beamlets efficiently in parallel on each available CPU core. The user can specify the desired statistical uncertainty of the beamlets, a fractional sparse dose threshold to save beamlets in a sparse format and minimal distances to the PTV surface from which 2 × 2 × 2 = 8 (medium) or even 4 × 4 × 4 = 64 (large) voxels are merged. The compromise between final plan quality and computational efficiency of beamlet calculation and optimization is studied for several parameter values to find a reasonable trade-off. For this purpose, four clinical and one academic case are considered with different treatment techniques.Main results.Setting the statistical uncertainty to 5% (photon beamlets) and 15% (electron beamlets), the fractional sparse dose threshold relative to the maximal beamlet dose to 0.1% and minimal distances for medium and large voxels to the PTV to 1 cm and 2 cm, respectively, does not lead to substantial degradation in final plan quality compared to using 2.5% (photon beamlets) and 5% (electron beamlets) statistical uncertainty and no sparse format nor voxel merging. Only OAR sparing is slightly degraded. Furthermore, computation times are reduced by about 58% (photon beamlets), 88% (electron beamlets) and 96% (optimization).Significance.Several methods are implemented improving computational efficiency of beamlet calculation and plan optimization of a fully MC based TPP without substantial degradation in final plan quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - G Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - W Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - N Torelli
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - D M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - P Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - M K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Koch A, Schanne DH, Günther G, Aebersold DM, Elicin O. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for recurrent hemoptysis due to chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: a case report and systematic review of the literature. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:192-200. [PMID: 36264357 PMCID: PMC9876869 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02013-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) can manifest as fungus balls in preexisting cavities of lung parenchyma and recurrent hemoptysis is among the most frequent complications. Radiotherapy can be considered for treatment-refractory aspergilloma and severe hemoptysis. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first application of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for a pulmonary aspergilloma in a patient with limited functional lung capacity. The topic was further expanded on with a systematic review of the literature addressing the implementation of radiotherapy in CPA patients. CASE REPORT A 52-year-old man presented with recurring and treatment-refractory hemoptysis caused by chronic cavitary aspergillosis localized in the left lower lobe. We applied SBRT on two consecutive days with a total dose of 16 Gy. Hemoptysis frequency decreased to a clinically insignificant level. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW We performed a systematic search of the literature in line with the PRISMA statement. The initial PubMed search resulted in 230 articles, of which 9 were included. RESULTS The available literature contained 35 patients with CPA who received radiotherapy. Dose fractionation usually ranged from 2 to 4 Gy per fraction, applied almost exclusively in conventional two-dimensional (2D) techniques. There is no report of SBRT usage in such a scenario. Most cases report a positive treatment response after irradiation. CONCLUSION The presented case demonstrates long-term clinical stability after SBRT for recurrent hemoptysis due to pulmonary aspergilloma. The systematic literature search revealed that concept definition is still uncertain, and further work is necessary to establish radiotherapy in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel H. Schanne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gunar Günther
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Allergology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland ,Department of Medical Sciences, UNAM School of Medicine, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schanne DH, Koch A, Elicin O, Giger R, Medová M, Zimmer Y, Aebersold DM. Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Radiotherapy-A Systematic Review. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123288. [PMID: 36552043 PMCID: PMC9775486 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Radiotherapy is a mainstay in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment but is mostly applied without stratification by molecular diagnostics. Development of reliable biomarkers may have the potential to improve radiotherapy (RT) efficacy and reduce toxicity. We conducted a systematic review to summarize the field of biomarkers in HNSCC treated by RT. Methods: Pubmed and EMBASE were searched independently by two researchers following pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Z curves were generated to investigate publication bias. OncoKB was used for identification of druggable targets. Results: 134 manuscripts remained for data extraction. 12% of tumors were AJCC/UICC stage I-II and 82% were stage III-IV. The most common biomarkers were proteins (39%), DNA (14%) and mRNA (9%). Limiting analysis to prospective data and statistically significant results, we found three potentially druggable targets: ERCC2, PTCH1 and EGFR. Regarding data quality, AJCC/UICC stage was missing in 32% of manuscripts. 73% of studies were retrospective and only 7% were based on prospective randomized trials. Z-curves indicated the presence of publication bias. Conclusion: An abundance of potential biomarkers in HNSCC is available but data quality is limited by retrospective collection, lack of validation and publication bias. Improved study design and reporting quality might accelerate successful development of personalized treatments in HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel H. Schanne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 28, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
- Correspondence:
| | - Alexander Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 28, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roland Giger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michaela Medová
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 28, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Yitzhak Zimmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 28, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Reinhardt P, Giger R, Seifert E, Shelan M, Riggenbach E, Terribilini D, Joosten A, Schanne DH, Aebersold DM, Manser P, Dettmer MS, Simon C, Ozsahin EM, Moeckli R, Limacher A, Caparrotti F, Nair D, Bourhis J, Broglie MA, Al-Mamgani A, Elicin O. VoiceS: voice quality after transoral CO 2 laser surgery versus single vocal cord irradiation for unilateral stage 0 and I glottic larynx cancer-a randomized phase III trial. Trials 2022; 23:906. [PMID: 36303192 PMCID: PMC9615245 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06841-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surgery and radiotherapy are well-established standards of care for unilateral stage 0 and I early-stage glottic cancer (ESGC). Based on comparative studies and meta-analyses, functional and oncological outcomes after both treatment modalities are similar. Historically, radiotherapy (RT) has been performed by irradiation of the whole larynx. However, only the involved vocal cord is being treated with recently introduced hypofractionated concepts that result in 8 to 10-fold smaller target volumes. Retrospective data argues for an improvement in voice quality with non-inferior local control. Based on these findings, single vocal cord irradiation (SVCI) has been implemented as a routine approach in some institutions for ESGC in recent years. However, prospective data directly comparing SVCI with surgery is lacking. The aim of VoiceS is to fill this gap. Methods In this prospective randomized multi-center open-label phase III study with a superiority design, 34 patients with histopathologically confirmed, untreated, unilateral stage 0-I ESGC (unilateral cTis or cT1a) will be randomized to SVCI or transoral CO2-laser microsurgical cordectomy (TLM). Average difference in voice quality, measured by using the voice handicap index (VHI) will be modeled over four time points (6, 12, 18, and 24 months). Primary endpoint of this study will be the patient-reported subjective voice quality between 6 to 24 months after randomization. Secondary endpoints will include perceptual impression of the voice via roughness – breathiness – hoarseness (RBH) assessment at the above-mentioned time points. Additionally, quantitative characteristics of voice, loco-regional tumor control at 2 and 5 years, and treatment toxicity at 2 and 5 years based on CTCAE v.5.0 will be reported. Discussion To our knowledge, VoiceS is the first randomized phase III trial comparing SVCI with TLM. Results of this study may lead to improved decision-making in the treatment of ESGC. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04057209. Registered on 15 August 2019. Cantonal Ethics Committee KEK-BE 2019-01506 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06841-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Reinhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roland Giger
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Eberhard Seifert
- Division of Phoniatrics, Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Elena Riggenbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Dario Terribilini
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Joosten
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel H Schanne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matthias S Dettmer
- Department of Pathology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.,Department of Pathology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christian Simon
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, CHUV University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon, 2, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat M Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Rue du Bugnon, 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institut of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Rue du Grand-Pré 1, 1007, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Limacher
- Clinical Trials Unit Bern, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Francesca Caparrotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Genève University Hospital, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Deepa Nair
- Department of Head Neck Surgical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Rue du Bugnon, 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Martina A Broglie
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Abrahim Al-Mamgani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1066, Amsterdam, CX, Netherlands
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Poel R, Rüfenacht E, Ermis E, Müller M, Fix MK, Aebersold DM, Manser P, Reyes M. Impact of random outliers in auto-segmented targets on radiotherapy treatment plans for glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:170. [PMID: 36273161 PMCID: PMC9587574 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02137-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims To save time and have more consistent contours, fully automatic segmentation of targets and organs at risk (OAR) is a valuable asset in radiotherapy. Though current deep learning (DL) based models are on par with manual contouring, they are not perfect and typical errors, as false positives, occur frequently and unpredictably. While it is possible to solve this for OARs, it is far from straightforward for target structures. In order to tackle this problem, in this study, we analyzed the occurrence and the possible dose effects of automated delineation outliers. Methods First, a set of controlled experiments on synthetically generated outliers on the CT of a glioblastoma (GBM) patient was performed. We analyzed the dosimetric impact on outliers with different location, shape, absolute size and relative size to the main target, resulting in 61 simulated scenarios. Second, multiple segmentation models where trained on a U-Net network based on 80 training sets consisting of GBM cases with annotated gross tumor volume (GTV) and edema structures. On 20 test cases, 5 different trained models and a majority voting method were used to predict the GTV and edema. The amount of outliers on the predictions were determined, as well as their size and distance from the actual target. Results We found that plans containing outliers result in an increased dose to healthy brain tissue. The extent of the dose effect is dependent on the relative size, location and the distance to the main targets and involved OARs. Generally, the larger the absolute outlier volume and the distance to the target the higher the potential dose effect. For 120 predicted GTV and edema structures, we found 1887 outliers. After construction of the planning treatment volume (PTV), 137 outliers remained with a mean distance to the target of 38.5 ± 5.0 mm and a mean size of 1010.8 ± 95.6 mm3. We also found that majority voting of DL results is capable to reduce outliers. Conclusions This study shows that there is a severe risk of false positive outliers in current DL predictions of target structures. Additionally, these errors will have an evident detrimental impact on the dose and therefore could affect treatment outcome.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02137-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Poel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. .,ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Elias Rüfenacht
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ekin Ermis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Müller
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mauricio Reyes
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wegener D, Aebersold DM, Grimm MO, Hammerer P, Froehner M, Graefen M, Boehmer D, Zips D, Wiegel T. Postoperative Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer: Adjuvant versus Early Salvage. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10092256. [PMID: 36140357 PMCID: PMC9496034 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Results of three randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) and early salvage radiotherapy (eSRT) of prostate carcinoma and a subsequent meta-analysis of the individual patient data from these RCTs were recently published. The results suggest that early eSRT is as effective and potentially less toxic than ART. Therefore, eSRT should be considered the standard of care. However, due to limitations in the RCTs, ART remains a valid treatment option in patients with the combination of high-risk features such as Gleason Score (GS) 8–10, positive surgical margins (R1) and pathological T-stage 3 or 4 (pT3/4). This article provides a critical appraisal of the RCTs and the rationale for recommendations adopted in the current national guidelines regarding patients with high-risk features after radical prostatectomy (RP): ART should be offered in case of pT3/pT4 and R1 and Gleason Score 8–10; ART can be offered in case of pT3/pT4 and R0 and Gleason Score 8–10 as well as in case of multifocal R1 (including pT2) and Gleason Score 8–10. In any case, the alternative treatment option of eSRT in case of rising PSA should be discussed with the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-070-7129-86143
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marc-Oliver Grimm
- Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, 07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Peter Hammerer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Michael Froehner
- Department of Urology, Zeisigwaldkliniken Bethanien Chemnitz, 09130 Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Boehmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tuebingen, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Guyer G, Mueller S, Koechli C, Frei D, Volken W, Bertholet J, Mackeprang PH, Loebner HA, Aebersold DM, Manser P, Fix MK. Enabling non-isocentric dynamic trajectory radiotherapy by integration of dynamic table translations. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac840d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. The purpose of this study is to develop a treatment planning process (TPP) for non-isocentric dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) using dynamic gantry rotation, collimator rotation, table rotation, longitudinal, vertical and lateral table translations and intensity modulation and to validate the dosimetric accuracy. Approach. The TPP consists of two steps. First, a path describing the dynamic gantry rotation, collimator rotation and dynamic table rotation and translations is determined. Second, an optimization of the intensity modulation along the path is performed. We demonstrate the TPP for three use cases. First, a non-isocentric DTRT plan for a brain case is compared to an isocentric DTRT plan in terms of dosimetric plan quality and delivery time. Second, a non-isocentric DTRT plan for a craniospinal irradiation (CSI) case is compared to a multi-isocentric intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan. Third, a non-isocentric DTRT plan for a bilateral breast case is compared to a multi-isocentric volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan. The non-isocentric DTRT plans are delivered on a TrueBeam in developer mode and their dosimetric accuracy is validated using radiochromic films. Main results. The non-isocentric DTRT plan for the brain case is similar in dosimetric plan quality and delivery time to the isocentric DTRT plan but is expected to reduce the risk of collisions. The DTRT plan for the CSI case shows similar dosimetric plan quality while reducing the delivery time by 45% in comparison with the IMRT plan. The DTRT plan for the breast case showed better treatment plan quality in comparison with the VMAT plan. The gamma passing rates between the measured and calculated dose distributions are higher than 95% for all three plans. Significance. The versatile benefits of non-isocentric DTRT are demonstrated with three use cases, namely reduction of collision risk, reduced setup and delivery time and improved dosimetric plan quality.
Collapse
|
32
|
Hovhannisyan L, Aebersold DM, Medova M, Ochsenbein AF, Maher J, Zimmer Y. P06.08.B Radiation therapy enhances anti-tumor activity of a MET CAR T-based immunotherapy for glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac174.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Glioblastoma is the most frequent primary brain tumor with dismal prognosis after standard treatment with surgery, and chemoradiation (the Stupp protocol). After a decade of failed clinical trials, tumor-treating fields have been first to show the added benefit of improved overall survival compared to the Stupp protocol (20.9 months vs 16.0 months). However, GBM remains a devastating disease, with almost inevitable recurrence, and limited options for second-line therapy. Radiation therapy (RT), is a standard therapy option for GBM, and it is used in most GBM cases affecting tumor through induction of DNA-damage. Recently, RT has been investigated as a mediator of T cell-based therapies in the context of immunosuppressive GBM microenvironment. The findings have shown promise in combination of T cell-based therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies, in improving the tumor infiltration, and penetration with immune cells. MET is a relevant oncogene in the context of GBM, being involved in stem-like properties, radiation response and resistance․ Hence, MET appeared to be a plausible target for combination with RT. In our research, we use MET-targeting CAR T cells (MET-CAR T cells) combined with radiation, and hypothesize synergistic interaction for GBM treatment.
Material and Methods
We used adherent (2D) and stem-like (3D) human GBM cell lines with different levels of MET expression. For MET-CAR T cell generation we did retrovirus-mediated transduction of activated human T cells and sorted the CAR-positive cells. We co-cultured MET-CAR T cells with GBM cells with or without RT, and assessed the killing and cytokine production in CAR T cells.
Results
Our results indicated that 5Gy radiation combined with MET-CAR T cells increases their potential in tumor cell killing. We observed increased CAR T cells effect at lower CAR T to target cells ratios when combined with radiation, even when radiation treatment did not lead to a significant decrease in viability. This phenomenon was similar across different types of cell lines (adherent, stem-like), different levels of MET expression, and different sensitivity to CAR T cells. We investigated the underlying mechanisms via intracellular cytokine measurement. We observed the most prominent response in TNF-α-expression. We also observed an increase in Granzyme B expression in co-culture with some of the GBM cell lines, especially in CD8+ subpopulation of CAR T cells. IFN-gamma expression increased in some adherent glioma cell lines but not in stem-like cell lines.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our data demonstrates the potency of MET-CAR T cells against GBM, and increased efficiency when combined with radiation. The suggested mechanism is the increased activation of T cells in TNF-α-dependent-manner. To validate these results we are testing our setup in an orthotopic mouse GBM model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Hovhannisyan
- University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland
- University Hospital Bern , Bern , Switzerland
| | | | - M Medova
- University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland
- University Hospital Bern , Bern , Switzerland
| | | | - J Maher
- Kings College London , London , United Kingdom
| | - Y Zimmer
- University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland
- University Hospital Bern , Bern , Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bojaxhiu B, Sinovcic D, Elicin O, Templeton AJ, Shelan M, Wartenberg J, Alberts I, Rominger A, Aebersold DM, Zaugg K. Correlation between hematological parameters and PET/CT metabolic parameters in patients with head and neck cancer. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:141. [PMID: 35964056 PMCID: PMC9375277 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02112-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Systemic inflammation is predictive of the overall survival in cancer patients and is related to the density of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment of cancer, which in turn correlates with 18F -fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) metabolic parameters (MPs). The density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the microenvironment has the potential to be a biomarker that can be used clinically to optimize patient selection in oropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). There is little to no data regarding the association of systemic inflammation with PET/CT-MPs, especially in HNSCC. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between markers of host inflammation, namely blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), with the PET/CT-MPs standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary tumor, derived from FDG-PET/CT in patients with nonmetastatic (cM0) HNSCC before treatment. We hypothesized that NLR and PLR at baseline are positively correlated with PET/CT-MPs. Methods A retrospective review of consecutive patients with HNSCC with a pretreatment PET/CT was performed. NLR and PLR were computed using complete blood counts measured within 10 days before the start of any treatment. The correlation between NLR and PLR with PET/CT-MPs was evaluated with Spearman's rho test. Results Seventy-one patients were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) at 1, 2, and 3 years was 86%, 76%, and 68%. PLR was found to be correlated with MTV (rho = 0.26, P = .03) and TLG (rho = 0.28, P = .02) but not with maximum SUV or mean SUV. There was no correlation between NLR and the analyzed PET/CT-MPs. TLG was associated with worse survival in uni- and multivariable analysis, but no other PET/CT-MPs were associated with either OS or disease-specific survival (DSS). NLR and PLR were associated with OS and DSS on uni- and multivariable analysis. Conclusions In patients with HNSCC before any treatment such as definitive radio (chemo)therapy or oncologic surgery followed by adjuvant RT, baseline PLR correlated with MTV and TLG but not with SUV. NLR was not correlated with any PET/CT-MPs analyzed in our study. Confirmatory studies are needed, and a potential interaction between tumor microenvironment, host inflammation, and FDG-PET/CT measures warrants further investigation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02112-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beat Bojaxhiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Stadtspital Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Dubravko Sinovcic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stadtspital Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Arnoud J Templeton
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Claraspital Basel and Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Wartenberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ian Alberts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kathrin Zaugg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Stadtspital Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bertholet J, Mackeprang PH, Mueller S, Guyer G, Loebner HA, Wyss Y, Frei D, Volken W, Elicin O, Aebersold DM, Fix MK, Manser P. Organ-at-risk sparing with dynamic trajectory radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: comparison with volumetric arc therapy on a publicly available library of cases. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:122. [PMID: 35841098 PMCID: PMC9284789 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02092-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) extends volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with dynamic table and collimator rotation during beam-on. The aim of the study is to establish DTRT path-finding strategies, demonstrate deliverability and dosimetric accuracy and compare DTRT to state-of-the-art VMAT for common head and neck (HN) cancer cases. Methods A publicly available library of seven HN cases was created on an anthropomorphic phantom with all relevant organs-at-risk (OARs) delineated. DTRT plans were generated with beam incidences minimizing fractional target/OAR volume overlap and compared to VMAT. Deliverability and dosimetric validation was carried out on the phantom. Results DTRT and VMAT had similar target coverage. For three locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal carcinomas and one adenoid cystic carcinoma, mean dose to the contralateral salivary glands, pharynx and oral cavity was reduced by 2.5, 1.7 and 3.1 Gy respectively on average with DTRT compared to VMAT. For a locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma, D0.03 cc to the ipsilateral optic nerve was above tolerance (54.0 Gy) for VMAT (54.8 Gy) but within tolerance for DTRT (53.3 Gy). For a laryngeal carcinoma, DTRT resulted in higher dose than VMAT to the pharynx and brachial plexus but lower dose to the upper oesophagus, thyroid gland and contralateral carotid artery. For a single vocal cord irradiation case, DTRT spared most OARs better than VMAT. All plans were delivered successfully on the phantom and dosimetric validation resulted in gamma passing rates of 93.9% and 95.8% (2%/2 mm criteria, 10% dose threshold). Conclusions This study provides a proof of principle of DTRT for common HN cases with plans that were deliverable on a C-arm linac with high accuracy. The comparison with VMAT indicates substantial OAR sparing could be achieved. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02092-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Paul-Henry Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hannes A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Yanick Wyss
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Müller AC, Aebersold DM, Albrecht C, Böhmer D, Flentje M, Ganswindt U, Ghadjar P, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Höcht S, Hölscher T, Niehoff P, Pinkawa M, Sedlmayer F, Wolf F, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Wiegel T. Radiotherapy for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with synchronous low burden of distant metastases. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:683-689. [PMID: 35704054 PMCID: PMC9300516 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01961-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The DEGRO Expert Commission on Prostate Cancer has revised the indication for radiation therapy of the primary prostate tumor in patients with synchronous distant metastases with low metastatic burden. Methods The current literature in the PubMed database was reviewed regarding randomized evidence on radiotherapy of the primary prostate tumor with synchronous low metastatic burden. Results In total, two randomized trials were identified. The larger study, the STAMPEDE trial, demonstrated an absolute survival benefit of 8% after 3 years for patients with low metastatic burden treated with standard of care (SOC) and additional radiotherapy (RT) (EQD2 ≤ 72 Gy) of the primary tumor. Differences in the smaller Horrad trial were not statistically significant, although risk reduction in the subgroup (< 5 bone metastases) was equal to STAMPEDE. The STOPCAP meta-analysis of both trials demonstrated the benefit of local radiotherapy for up to 4 bone lesions and an additional subanalysis of STAMPEDE also substantiated this finding in cases with M1a-only metastases. Conclusion Therefore, due to the survival benefit after 3 years, current practice is changing. New palliative SOC is radiotherapy of the primary tumor in synchronously metastasized prostate cancer with low metastatic burden (defined as ≤ 4 bone metastases, with or without distant nodes) or in case of distant nodes only detected by conventional imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arndt-Christian Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, RKH-Kliniken, Posilipostr. 4, 71640, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Clemens Albrecht
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Klinikum Nürnberg Nord, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Dirk Böhmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Flentje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Höcht
- Xcare Praxis für Strahlentherapie Saarlouis, Xcare Gruppe, Saarlouis, Germany
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | - Felix Sedlmayer
- Landeskrankenhaus, Universitätsklinikum der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Frank Wolf
- Landeskrankenhaus, Universitätsklinikum der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.,partner site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Melin N, Yarahmadov T, Sanchez-Taltavull D, Birrer FE, Brodie TM, Petit B, Felser A, Nuoffer JM, Montani M, Vozenin MC, Herrmann E, Candinas D, Aebersold DM, Stroka D. A new mouse model of radiation-induced liver disease reveals mitochondrial dysfunction as an underlying fibrotic stimulus. JHEP Reports 2022; 4:100508. [PMID: 35712694 PMCID: PMC9192810 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
37
|
Loebner HA, Volken W, Mueller S, Bertholet J, Mackeprang PH, Guyer G, Aebersold DM, Stampanoni M, Manser P, Fix MK. Development of a Monte Carlo based robustness calculation and evaluation tool. Med Phys 2022; 49:4780-4793. [PMID: 35451087 PMCID: PMC9545707 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evaluating plan robustness is a key step in radiotherapy. Purpose To develop a flexible Monte Carlo (MC)‐based robustness calculation and evaluation tool to assess and quantify dosimetric robustness of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans by exploring the impact of systematic and random uncertainties resulting from patient setup, patient anatomy changes, and mechanical limitations of machine components. Methods The robustness tool consists of two parts: the first part includes automated MC dose calculation of multiple user‐defined uncertainty scenarios to populate a robustness space. An uncertainty scenario is defined by a certain combination of uncertainties in patient setup, rigid intrafraction motion and in mechanical steering of the following machine components: angles of gantry, collimator, table‐yaw, table‐pitch, table‐roll, translational positions of jaws, multileaf‐collimator (MLC) banks, and single MLC leaves. The Swiss Monte Carlo Plan (SMCP) is integrated in this tool to serve as the backbone for the MC dose calculations incorporating the uncertainties. The calculated dose distributions serve as input for the second part of the tool, handling the quantitative evaluation of the dosimetric impact of the uncertainties. A graphical user interface (GUI) is developed to simultaneously evaluate the uncertainty scenarios according to user‐specified conditions based on dose‐volume histogram (DVH) parameters, fast and exact gamma analysis, and dose differences. Additionally, a robustness index (RI) is introduced with the aim to simultaneously evaluate and condense dosimetric robustness against multiple uncertainties into one number. The RI is defined as the ratio of scenarios passing the conditions on the dose distributions. Weighting of the scenarios in the robustness space is possible to consider their likelihood of occurrence. The robustness tool is applied on IMRT, a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT), and a dynamic mixed beam radiotherapy (DYMBER) plan for a brain case to evaluate the robustness to uncertainties of gantry‐, table‐, collimator angle, MLC, and intrafraction motion. Additionally, the robustness of the IMRT, VMAT, and DTRT plan against patient setup uncertainties are compared. The robustness tool is validated by Delta4 measurements for scenarios including all uncertainty types available. Results The robustness tool performs simultaneous calculation of uncertainty scenarios, and the GUI enables their fast evaluation. For all evaluated plans and uncertainties, the planning target volume (PTV) margin prevented major clinical target volume (CTV) coverage deterioration (maximum observed standard deviation of D98%CTV was 1.3 Gy). OARs close to the PTV experienced larger dosimetric deviations (maximum observed standard deviation of D2%chiasma was 14.5 Gy). Robustness comparison by RI evaluation against patient setup uncertainties revealed better dosimetric robustness of the VMAT and DTRT plans as compared to the IMRT plan. Delta4 validation measurements agreed with calculations by >96% gamma‐passing rate (3% global/2 mm). Conclusions The robustness tool was successfully implemented. Calculation and evaluation of uncertainty scenarios with the robustness tool were demonstrated on a brain case. Effects of patient and machine‐specific uncertainties and the combination thereof on the dose distribution are evaluated in a user‐friendly GUI to quantitatively assess and compare treatment plans and their robustness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - W Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - S Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - J Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - P-H Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - G Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mfm Stampanoni
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zürich and PSI, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - P Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - M K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mueller S, Guyer G, Risse T, Tessarini S, Aebersold DM, Stampanoni MFM, Fix MK, Manser P. A hybrid column generation and simulated annealing algorithm for direct aperture optimization. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac58db] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to develop a hybrid column generation (CG) and simulated annealing (SA) algorithm for direct aperture optimization (H-DAO) and to show its effectiveness in generating high quality treatment plans for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and mixed photon-electron beam radiotherapy (MBRT). The H-DAO overcomes limitations of the CG-DAO with two features improving aperture selection (branch-feature) and enabling aperture shape changes during optimization (SA-feature). The H-DAO algorithm iteratively adds apertures to the plan. At each iteration, a branch is created for each field provided. First, each branch determines the most promising aperture of its assigned field and adds it to a copy of the current apertures. Afterwards, the apertures of each branch undergo an MU-weight optimization followed by an SA-based simultaneous shape and MU-weight optimization and a second MU-weight optimization. The next H-DAO iteration continues the branch with the lowest objective function value. IMRT and MBRT treatment plans for an academic, a brain and a head and neck case generated using the CG-DAO and H-DAO were compared. For every investigated case and both IMRT and MBRT, the H-DAO leads to a faster convergence of the objective function value with number of apertures compared to the CG-DAO. In particular, the H-DAO needs about half the apertures to reach the same objective function value as the CG-DAO. The average aperture areas are 27% smaller for H-DAO than for CG-DAO leading to a slightly larger discrepancy between optimized and final dose. However, a dosimetric benefit remains. The H-DAO was successfully developed and applied to IMRT and MBRT. The faster convergence with number of apertures of the H-DAO compared to the CG-DAO allows to select a better compromise between plan quality and number of apertures.
Collapse
|
39
|
Correia D, Moullet B, Cullmann J, Heiss R, Ermiş E, Aebersold DM, Hemmatazad H. Response assessment after stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases: results from a single institutional study. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:37. [PMID: 35189919 PMCID: PMC8862557 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02004-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for tumor and pain control in patients with bone metastases is increasing. We report response assessment after bone SBRT using radiological changes through time and clinical examination of patients. Methods We analyzed retrospectively oligo-metastatic/progressive patients with bony lesions treated with SBRT between 12/2008 and 10/2018, without in-field re-irradiation, in our institution. Radiological data were obtained from imaging modalities used for SBRT planning and follow-up purposes in picture archiving and communication system and assessed by two independent radiologists blind to the time of treatment. Several radiological changes were described. Radiographic response assessment was classified according to University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center criteria. Pain response and the neurological deficit were captured before and at least 6 months after SBRT. Results A total of 35 of the 74 reviewed patients were eligible, presenting 43 bone metastases, with 51.2% (n = 22) located in the vertebral column. Median age at the time of SBRT was 66 years (range 38–84) and 77.1% (n = 27) were male. Histology was mainly prostate (51.4%, n = 18) and breast cancer (14.3%, n = 5). Median total radiation dose delivered was 24 Gy (range 24–42), in three fractions (range 2–7), prescribed to 70–90% isodose-line. After a median follow-up of 1.8 years (range < 1–8.2) for survivors, complete or partial response, stable, and progressive disease occurred in 0%, 11.4% (n = 4), 68.6% (n = 24), and 20.0% (n = 7) of the patients, respectively. Twenty patients (57.1%) died during the follow-up time, all from disease progression, yet 70% (n = 14) from this population with local stable disease after SBRT. From patients who were symptomatic and available for follow-up, almost half (44.4%) reported pain reduction after SBRT. Conclusions Eighty percent of the patients showed local control after SBRT for bone metastases. Pain response was favorable. For more accurate response assessment, comparing current imaging modalities with advanced imaging techniques such as functional MRI and PET/CT, in a prospective and standardized way is warranted. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
|
40
|
Cihoric N, Badra EV, Stenger-Weisser A, Aebersold DM, Pavic M. Toward Data-Driven Radiation Oncology Using Standardized Terminology as a Starting Point: Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e27550. [PMID: 35044315 PMCID: PMC8811690 DOI: 10.2196/27550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The inability to seamlessly exchange information across radiation therapy ecosystems is a limiting factor in the pursuit of data-driven clinical practice. The implementation of semantic interoperability is a prerequisite for achieving the full capacity of the latest developments in personalized and precision medicine, such as mathematical modeling, advanced algorithmic information processing, and artificial intelligence approaches. Objective This study aims to evaluate the state of terminology resources (TRs) dedicated to radiation oncology as a prerequisite for an oncology semantic ecosystem. The goal of this cross-sectional analysis is to quantify the state of the art in radiation therapy specific terminology. Methods The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) was searched for the following terms: radio oncology, radiation oncology, radiation therapy, and radiotherapy. We extracted 6509 unique concepts for further analysis. We conducted a quantitative analysis of available source vocabularies (SVs) and analyzed all UMLS SVs according to the route source, number, author, location of authors, license type, the lexical density of TR, and semantic types. Descriptive data are presented as numbers and percentages. Results The concepts were distributed across 35 SVs. The median number of unique concepts per SV was 5 (range 1-5479), with 14% (5/35) of SVs containing 94.59% (6157/6509) of the concepts. The SVs were created by 29 authors, predominantly legal entities registered in the United States (25/35, 71%), followed by international organizations (6/35, 17%), legal entities registered in Australia (2/35, 6%), and the Netherlands and the United Kingdom with 3% (1/35) of authors each. Of the total 35 SVs, 16 (46%) did not have any restrictions on use, whereas for 19 (54%) of SVs, some level of restriction was required. Overall, 57% (20/35) of SVs were updated within the last 5 years. All concepts found within radiation therapy SVs were labeled with one of the 29 semantic types represented within UMLS. After removing the stop words, the total number of words for all SVs together was 56,219, with a median of 25 unique words per SV (range 3-50,682). The total number of unique words in all SVs was 1048, with a median of 19 unique words per vocabulary (range 3-406). The lexical density for all concepts within all SVs was 0 (0.02 rounded to 2 decimals). Median lexical density per unique SV was 0.7 (range 0.0-1.0). There were no dedicated radiation therapy SVs. Conclusions We did not identify any dedicated TRs for radiation oncology. Current terminologies are not sufficient to cover the need of modern radiation oncology practice and research. To achieve a sufficient level of interoperability, of the creation of a new, standardized, universally accepted TR dedicated to modern radiation therapy is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikola Cihoric
- Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Eugenia Vlaskou Badra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anna Stenger-Weisser
- Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matea Pavic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Elicin O, Vollnberg B, Shelan M, Riggenbach E, Bojaxhiu B, Mathier E, Giger R, Aebersold DM, Klaeser B. Impact of pretreatment second look 18FDG-PET/CT on stage and treatment changes in head and neck cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:8-13. [PMID: 34504959 PMCID: PMC8414040 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The potential value of a second look PET/CT prior to radiotherapy was investigated. New lymph node metastases were discovered in half of the patients. Progression of the primary tumor and distant metastases were also observed. This strategy led to changes in treatment planning in more than half of the cases.
Background Patients diagnosed with locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) regularly undergo staging with 18F-FDG PET/CT in our center. In cases of delays in radiotherapy (RT) planning CT more than 4 weeks after initial PET/CT or clinically suspected progress, PET/CT is repeated for restaging and as an RT planning reference. Our aim was to determine the impact of second-look PET/CT on stage migration, treatment change and RT planning. Methods Consequent treatment changes were categorized as minor and major. Minor changes were defined as PET/CT-based modifications of RT plans, e.g., the addition of anatomical compartments, changes in high- and low-risk dose levels or both. Major changes included changes from curative to palliative treatment intent and alterations of interdisciplinary treatment plans, such as the addition of induction chemotherapy, switch to primary surgery, no treatment and/or the necessity of additional diagnostic work-up resulting in the postponement or cancellation of treatment. Results Thirty-two newly diagnosed LAHNSCC patients who were treated between 2014 and 2018 underwent second-look PET/CT (median interval 42.5 days). Second-look PET/CT led to locoregional and distant upstaging in 3/32 and 1/32 patients, respectively. In 1/32 patients (3%), second-look PET/CT led to a palliative approach with systemic treatment. New lymph node metastases were discovered in 16 patients, 6 of whom also showed significant progression of the primary tumor, resulting in minor changes in 16 of the remaining 31 patients (52%) who were treated curatively. Conclusion If RT treatment planning of LAHNSCC was delayed by more than 4 weeks after initial PET/CT staging or when progression was clinically suspected, a second look at 18FDG-PET/CT was performed. This led to changes in treatment planning in more than half of the cases, which is expected to directly influence oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Bernd Vollnberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Elena Riggenbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Beat Bojaxhiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, City Hospital Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Etienne Mathier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roland Giger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Bernd Klaeser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Shelan M, Riggenbach E, Aebersold DM. [Virtual prostatectomy using single dose radiotherapy]. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:943-945. [PMID: 34297155 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01824-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University, Inselspital, Freiburgstraße 10, 3010, Bern, Schweiz.
| | - Elena Riggenbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University, Inselspital, Freiburgstraße 10, 3010, Bern, Schweiz
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University, Inselspital, Freiburgstraße 10, 3010, Bern, Schweiz
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Poel R, Rüfenacht E, Hermann E, Scheib S, Manser P, Aebersold DM, Reyes M. The predictive value of segmentation metrics on dosimetry in organs at risk of the brain. Med Image Anal 2021; 73:102161. [PMID: 34293536 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fully automatic medical image segmentation has been a long pursuit in radiotherapy (RT). Recent developments involving deep learning show promising results yielding consistent and time efficient contours. In order to train and validate these systems, several geometric based metrics, such as Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff, and other related metrics are currently the standard in automated medical image segmentation challenges. However, the relevance of these metrics in RT is questionable. The quality of automated segmentation results needs to reflect clinical relevant treatment outcomes, such as dosimetry and related tumor control and toxicity. In this study, we present results investigating the correlation between popular geometric segmentation metrics and dose parameters for Organs-At-Risk (OAR) in brain tumor patients, and investigate properties that might be predictive for dose changes in brain radiotherapy. METHODS A retrospective database of glioblastoma multiforme patients was stratified for planning difficulty, from which 12 cases were selected and reference sets of OARs and radiation targets were defined. In order to assess the relation between segmentation quality -as measured by standard segmentation assessment metrics- and quality of RT plans, clinically realistic, yet alternative contours for each OAR of the selected cases were obtained through three methods: (i) Manual contours by two additional human raters. (ii) Realistic manual manipulations of reference contours. (iii) Through deep learning based segmentation results. On the reference structure set a reference plan was generated that was re-optimized for each corresponding alternative contour set. The correlation between segmentation metrics, and dosimetric changes was obtained and analyzed for each OAR, by means of the mean dose and maximum dose to 1% of the volume (Dmax 1%). Furthermore, we conducted specific experiments to investigate the dosimetric effect of alternative OAR contours with respect to the proximity to the target, size, particular shape and relative location to the target. RESULTS We found a low correlation between the DSC, reflecting the alternative OAR contours, and dosimetric changes. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the mean OAR dose effect and the Dice was -0.11. For Dmax 1%, we found a correlation of -0.13. Similar low correlations were found for 22 other segmentation metrics. The organ based analysis showed that there is a better correlation for the larger OARs (i.e. brainstem and eyes) as for the smaller OARs (i.e. optic nerves and chiasm). Furthermore, we found that proximity to the target does not make contour variations more susceptible to the dose effect. However, the direction of the contour variation with respect to the relative location of the target seems to have a strong correlation with the dose effect. CONCLUSIONS This study shows a low correlation between segmentation metrics and dosimetric changes for OARs in brain tumor patients. Results suggest that the current metrics for image segmentation in RT, as well as deep learning systems employing such metrics, need to be revisited towards clinically oriented metrics that better reflect how segmentation quality affects dose distribution and related tumor control and toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Poel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Elias Rüfenacht
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Evelyn Hermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Radiotherapy Department, Riviera-Chablais Hospital, Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Scheib
- Varian Medical Systems Imaging Laboratory, GmbH, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mauricio Reyes
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ghadjar P, Hayoz S, Bernhard J, Zwahlen DR, Hölscher T, Gut P, Polat B, Hildebrandt G, Müller AC, Plasswilm L, Papachristofilou A, Schär C, Sumila M, Zaugg K, Guckenberger M, Ost P, Reuter C, Bosetti DG, Khanfir K, Gomez S, Wust P, Thalmann GN, Aebersold DM. Dose-intensified Versus Conventional-dose Salvage Radiotherapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Prostatectomy: The SAKK 09/10 Randomized Phase 3 Trial. Eur Urol 2021; 80:306-315. [PMID: 34140144 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is utilized for biochemical progression of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP). OBJECTIVE To report the outcomes of the SAKK 09/10 trial comparing conventional and dose-intensified SRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS SAKK 09/10 was a randomized, multicenter, phase 3 trial that recruited men with biochemical progression after RP. INTERVENTION Patients were randomly assigned to conventional-dose (64 Gy) or dose-intensified SRT (70 Gy) to the prostate bed without hormonal therapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was freedom from biochemical progression (FFBP). Secondary endpoints included clinical progression-free survival (PFS), time to hormonal treatment, overall survival (OS), acute and late toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0), and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Between February 2011 and April 2014, 350 patients were randomly assigned to 64 Gy (n = 175) or 70 Gy (n = 175). Median prostate-specific antigen at randomization was 0.3 ng/ml. After median follow-up of 6.2 yr, the median FFBP was 8.2 yr in the 64 Gy arm and 7.6 in the 70 Gy arm (log-rank p = 0.4), with a hazard ratio of 1.14 (95% confidence interval 0.82-1.60). The 6-year FFBP rates were 62% and 61%, respectively. No significant differences in clinical PFS, time to hormonal treatment, or OS were observed. Late grade 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicity was observed in 35 (21%) and 13 (7.9%) patients in the 64 Gy arm, and 46 (26%) and seven (4%) in the 70 Gy arm, respectively (p = 0.8). Late grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in 12 (7.3%) and seven patients (4.2%) in the 64 Gy arm, and 35 (20%) and four (2.3%) in the 70 Gy arm, respectively (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in QoL. CONCLUSIONS Conventional-dose SRT to the prostate bed is sufficient in patients with early biochemical progression of prostate cancer after RP. PATIENT SUMMARY The optimal radiation therapy dose for patients who have increased tumor markers after surgery for prostate cancer is unclear. We found that administering a higher dose only increased the gastrointestinal side effects without providing any benefits to the patient. This clinical trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01272050.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland.
| | | | - Jürg Bernhard
- IBCSG Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel R Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Philipp Gut
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Bülent Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Guido Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Ludwig Plasswilm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Marcin Sumila
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hirslanden Hospital Group, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Kathrin Zaugg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stadtspital Triemli, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Christiane Reuter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Münsterlingen, Switzerland
| | - Davide G Bosetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Kaouthar Khanfir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Valais, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Peter Wust
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - George N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Eychmüller S, Zwahlen S, Fliedner MC, Jüni P, Aebersold DM, Aujesky D, Fey MF, Maessen M, Trelle S. Single early palliative care intervention added to usual oncology care for patients with advanced cancer: A randomized controlled trial (SENS Trial). Palliat Med 2021; 35:1108-1117. [PMID: 33908288 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211005340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND International oncology societies recommend early palliative care. Specific models to integrate early palliative care efficiently into clinical practice are debated. The authors designed a study to look at the quantitative and qualitative outcomes of an early palliative care intervention in oncological care to decrease stress and improve quality of life. AIMS To compare a single structured early palliative care intervention added to a usual oncology care in terms of distress and health-related quality of life at baseline compared to 6 months after enrollment. DESIGN This multicenter randomized controlled trial (NCT01983956) enrolled adult patients with advanced cancer. Participants were either randomly assigned to usual oncology care alone or usual care plus a structured early palliative care intervention. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS One hundred fifty adult patients with a variety of advanced cancer diagnoses were randomized. Seventy-four participants were in the intervention and 76 participants in the control group. The primary outcome was the change in patient distress assessed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer at 6 months. Health-related quality of life, the secondary outcome, was assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Questionnaire. RESULTS The results showed no significant effect of the early palliative care intervention neither on patient distress nor on health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION The addition of an early intervention to usual care for patients with advanced cancer did not improve distress or quality of life. Thus, patients may need more intensive early palliative care with continuous professional support to identify and address their palliative needs early.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Eychmüller
- University Center for Palliative Care, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Susanne Zwahlen
- Unit for Specialized Palliative Care, Lindenhof Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Monica C Fliedner
- University Center for Palliative Care, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Peter Jüni
- Applied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Department of Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Drahomir Aujesky
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Martin F Fey
- Department for Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Maud Maessen
- University Center for Palliative Care, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sven Trelle
- CTU Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dal Pra A, Ghadjar P, Hayoz S, Spratt DE, Liu VYT, Todorovic T, Davicioni E, Huang HC, Gut P, Plasswilm L, Hölscher T, Polat B, Hildebrandt G, Mueller AC, Thalmann GN, Zwahlen DR, Aebersold DM. Validation of the decipher genomic classifier (GC) in SAKK 09/10: A phase III randomized trial of dose-escalated salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5010 Background: GC has been shown to independently prognosticate outcomes in prostate cancer. Herein, we validate the GC in a European randomized phase III trial of dose escalated SRT after RP. Methods: SAKK 09/10 (NCT01272050) randomized 350 patients with biochemical recurrence after RP to 64Gy vs 70Gy. No patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or pelvic nodal radiotherapy. A pre-specified statistical plan was developed to assess the impact of the GC on clinical outcomes. RP samples were centrally reviewed for the highest-grade tumor and those passing quality control (QC) were run on a clinical-grade whole-transcriptome assay to obtain the GC score (0 to 1; < 0.45, 0.45-0.6, > 0.6 for low-, intermediate-, and high, respectively). The primary aim of this study was to validate the GC for the prediction of freedom from biochemical progression (FFBP) using Cox multivariable analysis (MVA) adjusting for age, T-category, Gleason score, persistent PSA after RP, PSA at randomization, and randomization arm. The secondary aims were to evaluate the association of GC with clinical progression-free survival (CPFS) and use of salvage ADT. Results: Of 233 patients with tissue available, 226 passed QC and were included for analysis. The final GC cohort was a representative sample of the overall cohort, with a median follow-up of 6.3 years (IQR 6.0-7.2). GC score (continuous per 0.1 unit, score 0-1) was independently associated with FFBP (HR 1.14 [95% CI 1.03-1.25], p = 0.009). Higher GC scores were independently associated with CPFS, use of salvage ADT, and rapid biochemical failure ( < 18 months after SRT). High- vs. low/intermediate-GC showed a HR of 2.22 ([95% CI 1.37-3.58], p = 0.001) for FFBP, 2.29 ([95% CI 1.32-3.98], p = 0.003) for CPFS, and 2.99 ([95% CI 1.50-5.95], p = 0.002) for use of salvage ADT. Patients with high-GC had 5-year FFBP of 45% [95% CI 32-59] vs 71% [95% CI 64-78] in low-intermediate GC. Similar estimates for GC risk groups were observed in the 64Gy vs 70Gy in GC high (5-year FFBP of 51% [95% CI 32-70] vs 39% [95% CI 20-59]) and in low-intermediate GC (75% [95% CI 65-84] vs 69% [95% CI 59-78]). Conclusions: This study represents the first contemporary randomized controlled trial in patients with recurrent prostate cancer treated with early SRT without ADT that has validated the prognostic utility of the GC. Independent of standard clinicopathologic variables and radiotherapy dose, patients with a high-GC were more than twice as likely than a lower GC score to experience biochemical and clinical progression and receive salvage ADT. This data confirms the clinical value of Decipher GC for tailoring treatment in the postoperative salvage setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Dal Pra
- Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | | | - Stefanie Hayoz
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Philipp Gut
- Hirslanden Hospital Group, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Tobias Hölscher
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bülent Polat
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Muñoz-Maldonado C, Quintin A, Aebersold DM, Zimmer Y, Medová M. Abstract PO-026: DNA damage response and repair characterization in CHK2-deficient cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.radsci21-po-026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most lethal DNA lesions as they can result in chromosomal rearrangements or loss of genetic material. To detect and repair DNA, cells have developed the DNA damage response, a cascade of proteins in which the checkpoint kinase 2 (CHK2) is involved. CHK2-deficient cancers, such as breast, prostate or colon, might have a compromised response to ionizing radiation (IR), arresting cell cycle at checkpoints or inducing apoptosis in presence of irreparable damage. To understand how the lack of CHK2 is affecting DNA damage response and repair, the human isogenic HCT116 colorectal cancer cell lines proficient (CHK2 WT) and deficient (CHK2 KO) for CHK2 have been characterized. Cell cycle distribution and γH2AX foci formation were assessed by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence, respectively, to determine the differences in cell cycle checkpoints and DSBs infliction and resolution upon IR. Traffic Light Reporter, complemented by immunofluorescence of RAD51 foci, was employed in both CHK2 WT and KO cell lines to identify the preferred DSB repair pathway. Our results indicate that CHK2-proficient and -deficient cell lines do not exhibit significant differences in cell cycle distribution upon IR. On the other hand, CHK2 KO cells display a significant increase in γH2AX foci per cell compared to the CHK2 WT. Upon 1Gy of IR, cells lacking CHK2 increment the number of foci per cell, indicating that DSBs detection occurs independently of the CHK2 status. Furthermore, the Traffic Light Reporter revealed higher homologous recombination (HR) to non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) ratio in the CHK2 KO cells as compared to their CHK2 WT counterparts, suggesting that the lack of CHK2 stimulates a shift in the DSBs repair pathway choice. These results contrast with the RAD51 foci formation, which seems to be compromised in the CHK2 KO cells in both treated and untreated conditions as compared to the CHK2-proficient cells. Our results suggest that CHK2 status considerably affects cellular DNA damage response and these differences in execution of DNA repair could be exploited in CHK2-deficient cancers.
Citation Format: Carmen Muñoz-Maldonado, Aurélie Quintin, Daniel M. Aebersold, Yitzhak Zimmer, Michaela Medová. DNA damage response and repair characterization in CHK2-deficient cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Radiation Science and Medicine; 2021 Mar 2-3. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(8_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-026.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Muñoz-Maldonado
- 1Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland,
- 2University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Yitzhak Zimmer
- 1Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland,
- 2University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hovhannisyan L, Aebersold DM, Maher J, Ochsenbein AF, Riether C, Medova M, Zimmer Y. Abstract PO-039: Radiation therapy enhances anti-tumor activity of a MET CAR T-based immunotherapy approach for glioblastoma multiforme. Clin Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.radsci21-po-039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most prevalent primary malignant brain tumor, which has an aggressive phenotype and mostly fatal recurrence after standard therapy. MET, the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) receptor is a relevant target for GBM treatment as it is expressed in up to 50% of cases and its expression, which may be induced by radiation therapy (RT), can potentially contribute to RT-resistance of GBM stem cells, and tumor recurrence. MET-based chimeric antigen (CAR) T cell therapy is currently being evaluated in several solid tumor working settings. A combination of T cell-based therapies with RT may improve the efficacy of the CAR T cell therapy through by the RT-induced immune activation via release of cytokines and induction of antigen expression, similarly as has been observed when combining RT with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here we investigated the combination of MET-targeting CAR T cells with RT for GBM treatment, hypothesizing enhanced anti-tumor effects. The current study used a panel of MET-proficient and MET-deficient human GBM and GBM stem-like cell lines. Cells have been irradiated with a single dose of 0, 2, 5, or 10 Gy and RT impact on MET expression has been assessed at various time points after RT administration. Results show MET increase after RT in some cell lines. To test MET-targeting CAR T effect on the GBM cell lines, CAR constructs that are based on HGF-MET binding elements have been introduced into virus-producing cells and used for human T cells transduction to generate MET-targeting CAR T cells. CAR T cells co-cultured with GBM cell lines in vitro have specifically and significantly decreased viability of MET-positive cancer cells. Data resulting from combination of RT and CAR T cells treatment suggest that radiation exhibits an enhancement of CAR T cells anti-tumor killing activity, indicating a synergism between the two modalities. In conclusion, our data are the first to indicate the efficacy of a MET-based CAR T immunotherapy approach in GBM cell lines. The results also demonstrate a basis for the combination of a MET CAR T modality together with RT. The mechanisms for understanding the interaction between RT and the MET CAR T cells are under investigation.
Citation Format: Lusine Hovhannisyan, Daniel M. Aebersold, John Maher, Adrian F. Ochsenbein, Carsten Riether, Michaela Medova, Yitzhak Zimmer. Radiation therapy enhances anti-tumor activity of a MET CAR T-based immunotherapy approach for glioblastoma multiforme [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Radiation Science and Medicine; 2021 Mar 2-3. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(8_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-039.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lusine Hovhannisyan
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland,
- 2Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland,
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland,
| | - John Maher
- 3Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom,
| | - Adrian F. Ochsenbein
- 2Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland,
- 4Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carsten Riether
- 2Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland,
- 4Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michaela Medova
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland,
- 2Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland,
| | - Yitzhak Zimmer
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland,
- 2Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland,
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Melin N, Sánchez-Taltavull D, Fahrner R, Keogh A, Dosch M, Büchi I, Zimmer Y, Medová M, Beldi G, Aebersold DM, Candinas D, Stroka D. Synergistic effect of the TLR5 agonist CBLB502 and its downstream effector IL-22 against liver injury. Cell Death Dis 2021; 12:366. [PMID: 33824326 PMCID: PMC8024273 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-021-03654-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) agonist, CBLB502/Entolimod, is a peptide derived from bacterial flagellin and has been shown to protect against radiation-induced tissue damage in animal models. Here we investigated the protective mechanism of CBLB502 in the liver using models of ischemia-reperfusion injury and concanavalin A (ConA) induced immuno-hepatitis. We report that pretreatment of mice with CBLB502 provoked a concomitant activation of NF-κB and STAT3 signaling in the liver and reduced hepatic damage in both models. To understand the underlying mechanism, we screened for cytokines in the serum of CBLB502 treated animals and detected high levels of IL-22. There was no transcriptional upregulation of IL-22 in the liver, rather it was found in extrahepatic tissues, mainly the colon, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), and spleen. RNA-seq analysis on isolated hepatocytes demonstrated that the concomitant activation of NF-κB signaling by CBLB502 and STAT3 signaling by IL-22 produced a synergistic cytoprotective transcriptional signature. In IL-22 knockout mice, the loss of IL-22 resulted in a decrease of hepatic STAT3 activation, a reduction in the cytoprotective signature, and a loss of hepatoprotection following ischemia-reperfusion-induced liver injury. Taken together, these findings suggest that CBLB502 protects the liver by increasing hepatocyte resistance to acute liver injury through the cooperation of TLR5-NF-κB and IL-22-STAT3 signaling pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Melin
- Department for BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Sánchez-Taltavull
- Department for BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - René Fahrner
- Department for BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Bürgerspital Solothurn, 4500, Solothurn, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Keogh
- Department for BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michel Dosch
- Department for BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Isabel Büchi
- Department for BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Yitzhak Zimmer
- Department for BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michaela Medová
- Department for BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Guido Beldi
- Department for BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department for BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Candinas
- Department for BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Stroka
- Department for BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
- Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ermiş E, Anschuetz L, Leiser D, Poel R, Raabe A, Manser P, Aebersold DM, Caversaccio M, Mantokoudis G, Abu-Isa J, Wagner F, Herrmann E. Vestibular dose correlates with dizziness after radiosurgery for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:61. [PMID: 33771181 PMCID: PMC7995572 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01793-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been recognized as a first-line treatment option for small to moderate sized vestibular schwannoma (VS). Our aim is to evaluate the impact of SRS doses and other patient and disease characteristics on vestibular function in patients with VS. Methods Data on VS patients treated with single-fraction SRS to 12 Gy were retrospectively reviewed. No dose constraints were given to the vestibule during optimization in treatment planning. Patient and tumor characteristics, pre- and post-SRS vestibular examination results and patient-reported dizziness were assessed from patient records. Results Fifty-three patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 32 months (range, 6–79). The median minimum, mean and maximum vestibular doses were 2.6 ± 1.6 Gy, 6.7 ± 2.8 Gy, and 11 ± 3.6 Gy, respectively. On univariate analysis, Koos grade (p = 0.04; OR: 3.45; 95% CI 1.01–11.81), tumor volume (median 6.1 cm3; range, 0.8–38; p = 0.01; OR: 4.85; 95% CI 1.43–16.49), presence of pre-SRS dizziness (p = 0.02; OR: 3.98; 95% CI 1.19–13.24) and minimum vestibular dose (p = 0.033; OR: 1.55; 95% CI 1.03–2.32) showed a significant association with patient-reported dizziness. On multivariate analysis, minimum vestibular dose remained significant (p = 0.02; OR: 1.75; 95% CI 1.05–2.89). Patients with improved caloric function had received significantly lower mean (1.5 ± 0.7 Gy, p = 0.01) and maximum doses (4 ± 1.5 Gy, p = 0.01) to the vestibule. Conclusions Our results reveal that 5 Gy and above minimum vestibular doses significantly worsened dizziness. Additionally, mean and maximum doses received by the vestibule were significantly lower in patients who had improved caloric function. Further investigations are needed to determine dose-volume parameters and their effects on vestibular toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekin Ermiş
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Anschuetz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Dominic Leiser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.,Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Robert Poel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Raabe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Georgios Mantokoudis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Janine Abu-Isa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Franca Wagner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Evelyn Herrmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Rennaz, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|