Concurrent use of cisplatin or cetuximab with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The present meta-analysis was updated with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to revaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab vs. cisplatin combined with radiotherapy in patients of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

A meta-analysis containing RCTs that compared the efficacy or toxicity of cetuximab and cisplatin in HNSCC patients was conducted.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included in the final analysis. The patients treated by cetuximab plus radiotherapy showed an inferior overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LRC) compared to cisplatin plus radiotherapy. The tendency of progression-free survival (PFS) was in agreement with OS and LRC. Subgroup analysis showed that cetuximab had poorer OS relative to cisplatin in the absence of induction chemotherapy. The profile of severe adverse events (SAEs) varied between the two groups, no significant difference in total SAEs was shown for the two arms.

DISCUSSION

Cetuximab combined with radiotherapy shows significantly reduced therapeutic efficacy compared to cisplatin plus radiotherapy in HNSCC patients.

Real-world clinical outcomes in Japanese patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy plus cetuximab: a prospective observational study (JROSG12-2)

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy plus cetuximab (bioradiotherapy: BRT) is a standard option in the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN). Published data on its safety and efficacy in real-world settings is limited. Here, we conducted a prospective multi-institutional observational study to evaluate clinical outcomes of BRT in patients with LA-SCCHN.

METHODS

We analyzed real-world data of all patients who underwent BRT from 2013 to 2016. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were 1-year locoregional PFS (LPFS), treatment completion rate (TCR), and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up were analyzed. Median age was 67 (36-85) years, and 37 patients (21.6%) were aged 75 years or older. 1-year PFS and LPFS were 51.5 and 56.1%, respectively. N stage (p = 0.049) was significantly associated with PFS. TCR was 77.2%. Cetuximab was definitively discontinued in 30 patients (17.5%), in 15 cases due to severe mucositis. N stage, T stage, and comorbidity were significantly associated with TCR. Major AEs of grade 3 or higher were pharyngeal mucositis (48.5%), radiation dermatitis (45.6%), and oral mucositis (40.4%). Pneumonitis was observed in 12 patients (7.0%); 6 cases (3.5%) were grades 3-4 and 2 (1.2%) were grade 5.

CONCLUSION

As a result of the large number of elderly patients in clinical practice,　toxicity reduced TCR. BRT-induced pneumonitis, which is sometimes fatal, was found to be more frequent than with chemotherapy plus cetuximab.

Cetuximab and anemia prevention in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation is associated with increased production of interleukin 6 (IL6), which is intensified by radiotherapy (RT) induced inflammatory response. Elevated IL6 levels intensifies RT-induced anemia by upregulating hepcidin causing functional iron deficiency. Cetuximab, an EGFR inhibitor, has been associated with lower rates of anemia for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We hypothesized that concomitant cetuximab could prevent RT-induced anemia.

METHODS

We queried our institutional head and neck cancers database for non-metastatic HNSCC cases that received RT with concomitant cetuximab or RT-only between 2006 and 2018. Cetuximab was administered for some high-risk cases medically unfit for platinum agents per multidisciplinary team evaluation. We only included patients who had at least one complete blood count in the 4 months preceding and after RT. We compared the prevalence of anemia (defined as hemoglobin (Hb) below 12 g/dL in females and 13 g/dL in males) and mean Hb levels at baseline and after RT. Improvement of anemia/Hb (resolution of baseline anemia and/or an increase of baseline Hb ≥1 g/dL after RT), and overall survival (OS) in relation to anemia/Hb dynamics were also compared.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients were identified equally distributed between cetuximab-plus-RT and RT-only groups. The cetuximab-plus-RT group had more locally-advanced stage, oropharyngeal and high grade tumors (p < 0.001 for all). Baseline anemia/Hb were similar, however anemia after RT conclusion was higher in the cetuximab-plus-RT vs RT-only (63.5% vs. 44.2%; p = 0.017), with a mean Hb of 11.98 g/dL vs. 12.9 g/dL; p = 0.003, for both respectively. This contributed to significantly worse anemia/Hb improvement for cetuximab-plus-RT (18.8% vs. 37.2%; p = 0.007). This effect was maintained after adjusting for other factors in multivariate analysis. The prevalence of iron, vitamin-B12 and folate deficiencies; and chronic kidney disease, was non-different. Baseline anemia was associated with worse OS (p = 0.0052) for the whole study cohort. Nevertheless, improvement of anemia/Hb was only marginally associated with better OS (p = 0.068).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to previous studies, cetuximab was not associated with lower rates of anemia after RT for nonmetastatic HNSCC patients compared to RT-alone. Dedicated prospective studies are needed to elucidate the effect of cetuximab on RT-induced anemia.

A Study Comparing Acute Toxicities of Cetuximab and Cisplatin in Patients Undergoing Definitive Chemoradiation With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Carcinoma Head and Neck

Purpose To study the acute toxicities of weekly cetuximab used concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus weekly cisplatin with concurrent IMRT in locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Materials and methods Fifty eligible patients were randomly assigned to study group (cetuximab group) and control group (cisplatin group) to receive cetuximab 400 mg/m² intravenously one week prior to the start of RT followed by 250 mg/m²/week, or weekly cisplatin intravenously 40 mg/m², during RT. RT dose received was 70Gy in 35 fractions with 2Gy/fraction in both the arms with IMRT technique. Patients are reviewed every week and Patients were evaluated for acute toxicities according to radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) toxicity scoring criteria and toxicities grade was reported. Results The incidence of acute toxicities like oral mucositis, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, and leukopenia were much less in cetuximab arm and statistically significant difference was observed as compared to cisplatin arm. and no major systemic toxicities were encountered in the cetuximab arm. Conclusion Weekly cetuximab with concurrent radiotherapy in locally advanced HNSCC is a promising regimen with well tolerable toxicity profile. Larger prospective randomized studies with a longer duration of follow-up with direct comparison of both the regimens are needed for strong evaluation of efficacy and toxicity profile.

Induction Chemotherapy Followed by either Chemoradiotherapy or Bioradiotherapy in Laryngeal Cancer

Objective:

In loco regionally advanced head and neck cancer, the superiority of concomitant cetuximab with radiation over radiation alone has been proven previously. But comparison between chemo radiation and bioradiation has not been well studied.

Methods:

Between October 2013 and August 2017, 38 patients with locoregionally advanced laryngeal cancer and more than 50% response to 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy (docetaxel and cisplatin: both with a dose of 75 mg/m² on the first day and 5-flurouracil: 750 mg/m² during days 1to 3; repeated every 21 days) were selected to receive either carboplatin (18 patients, AUC 1.5 , weekly) or cetuximab (20 patients, with loading dose of 400 mg/m² and weekly dose of 250 mg/m2) with radiation. A Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to calculate progression free survival and overall survival rates. The log–rank test was used to compare overall survival between treatment groups.

Results:

The median follow up time was 36 months. The 2-year organ preservation rate of 78.9% was achieved. The 3- year progression-free survival rates of 65.2%, 72.7% and 58.2% were observed for all patients, carboplatin group and cetuximab group, respectively (p=0.4). The 3-year estimates of overall survival were 67.8%, 69.2 %, and 66.3 % for all patients, carboplatin group and cetuximab group, respectively (p=0.47). Concomitant carboplatin was discontinued in 3 patients due to toxicity

Conclusion:

Concomitant cetuximab is a reasonable alternative to concomitant chemotherapy. But the difference in treatment outcome between bioradiation and chemoradiation remains to be defined.

Comparative efficacy and safety of radiotherapy/cetuximab versus radiotherapy/chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients: a systematic review of published, primarily non-randomized, data

Background:

Cetuximab (CTX) has been approved to be administered concurrently with radiotherapy (RT) to treat locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of concurrent CTX with RT (ExRT).

Method:

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE databases were systematically searched to find relevant articles. The combined hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval were calculated to assess the efficacy and safety of ExRT in contrast to concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy with RT (ChRT).

Results:

In total, 32 articles with 4556 patients were included. The pooled HRs indicated that ExRT achieved an unfavorable overall survival (HR: 1.86, p < 0.0001), disease-specific survival (HR: 2.58, p = 0.002), locoregional control (HR: 1.94, p < 0.00001), and progression-free survival (HR: 2.04, p = 0.003) compared with ChRT for locally advanced HNSCC patients. In human papillomavirus-positive patient subgroups, ExRT showed inferior disease-specific survival (HR: 2.55, p = 0.009) and locoregional control (HR: 2.27, p < 0.0001) in contrast to ChRT. Additionally, ExRT increased the occurrence of mucositis (RR: 1.17, p < 0.005), skin toxicity (RR: 6.26, p < 0.00001), and infection (RR: 2.27, p = 0.04) compared with non-CTX groups (ChRT and RT), and was associated with lower incidence of anemia (RR: 0.35, p = 0.009), leukocytopenia (RR: 0.17, p < 0.0001), neutropenia (RR: 0.06, p < 0.0001), nausea/vomiting (RR: 0.23, p < 0.0001), and renal toxicity (RR: 0.14, p = 0.007).

Conclusion:

ChRT should remain the standard treatment for locally advanced HNSCC patients. ExRT was recognized as an effective alternative treatment for locally advanced HNSCC patients who experienced unbearable toxicities caused by non-CTX treatments.

ARTSCAN III: A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Chemoradiotherapy With Cisplatin Versus Cetuximab in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer

We performed an open-label randomized controlled phase III study comparing treatment outcome and toxicity between radiotherapy (RT) with concomitant cisplatin versus concomitant cetuximab in patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC; stage III-IV according to the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification, 7th edition).

Concurrent cisplatin or cetuximab with radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Concurrent cisplatin with radiotherapy (CRT) or concurrent cetuximab with radiotherapy (BRT) improves outcomes in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) compared with radiotherapy alone. Nevertheless, a detailed comparison between CRT and BRT in locally advanced HNSCC is required due to inconclusive results.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane databases, and EMBASE. Studies that evaluated CRT vs BRT in locally advanced HNSCC were included. The primary outcome that was overall survival (OS), whereas the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LRC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate prognosis. All the analyses were performed using Stata Statistical Software 12.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies, with a total of 8701 patients, were considered eligible and included in this meta-analysis. Our results revealed that patients treated with CRT had longer OS (HR = 0.51, 95%CI, 0.41-0.64, P < .001), PFS (HR = 0.37, 95%CI, 0.23-0.60, P < .001), LRC (HR = 0.46, 95%CI, 0.37-0.57, P < .001), and DMFS (HR = 0.56, 95%CI, 0.40-0.77, P < .001) than those treated with BRT. Furthermore, the results of the subgroup analyses were consistent with the primary analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT has a better OS, PFS, LRC, and DMFS than BRT in locally advanced HNSCC, and should be the preferred treatment for patients with the disease.

Methodological Development of Combination Drug and Radiotherapy in Basic and Clinical Research

Newer technical improvements in radiation oncology have been rapidly implemented in recent decades, allowing an improved therapeutic ratio. The development of strategies using local and systemic treatments concurrently, mainly targeted therapies, has however plateaued. Targeted molecular compounds and immunotherapy are increasingly being incorporated as the new standard of care for a wide array of cancers. A better understanding of possible prior methodology issues is therefore required and should be integrated into upcoming early clinical trials including individualized radiotherapy-drug combinations. The outcome of clinical trials is influenced by the validity of the preclinical proofs of concept, the impact on normal tissue, the robustness of biomarkers and the quality of the delivery of radiation. Herein, key methodological aspects are discussed with the aim of optimizing the design and implementation of future precision drug-radiotherapy trials.

Disease-induced and treatment-induced alterations in body composition in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiation or bioradiation treatment (CRT/BRT) of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) comes with high toxicity rates, often leading to temporary tube feeding (TF) dependency. Cachexia is a common problem in LAHNSCC. Yet changes in body composition and muscle weakness during CRT/BRT are underexplored. Strong evidence on the effect of TF on body composition during treatment is lacking. The aim of this cohort study was to assess (i) the relationship of fat-free mass index (FFMI) and handgrip strength (HGS) with CRT/BRT toxicity and outcome, (ii) body composition in patients treated with chemoradiation (cisplatin) vs. bioradiation (cetuximab), and (iii) the effect of the current TF regime on body composition and muscle strength.

METHODS

Locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with CRT/BRT between January 2013 and December 2016 were included (n = 137). Baseline measurements of body composition (bioelectrical impedance analysis) and HGS were performed. Toxicity grades (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) were scored. In a subset of 69 patients, weight loss, body composition, and HGS were additionally assessed during and after CRT/BRT. TF was initiated according to the Dutch guidelines for malnutrition.

RESULTS

In this cohort (68% male, mean age 59 ± 8 years), the incidence of baseline muscle wasting, defined as FFMI < P₁₀ , was 29%. Muscle wasting was present in 23 of 100 (23%) chemoradiation patients and 17 of 37 (46%) bioradiation patients (P = 0.009). Muscle-wasted patients required more unplanned hospitalizations during CRT (P = 0.035). In the chemoradiation subset, dose-limiting toxicity was significantly higher in wasted vs. non-wasted patients (57% vs. 25%, P = 0.004). Median follow-up was 32 months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified muscle wasting as independent unfavourable prognostic factor for overall survival [hazard ratio 2.1 (95% CI 1.1-4.1), P = 0.022] and cisplatin as favourable prognostic factor [hazard ratio 0.3 (95% CI 0.2-0.6), P = 0.001]. Weight and HGS significantly decreased during CRT/BRT, -3.7 ± 3.5 kg (P < 0.001) and -3.1 ± 6.0 kg (P < 0.001), respectively. Sixty-four per cent of the patients required TF 21 days (range 0-59) after CRT/BRT initiation. Total weight loss during CRT/BRT was significantly (P = 0.007) higher in the total oral diet group (5.5 ± 3.7 kg) compared with the TF group (3.0 ± 3.2 kg). Loss of FFM and HGS was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In LAHNSCC patients undergoing CRT/BRT, FFMI < P₁₀ is an unfavourable prognostic factor for overall survival, treatment toxicity, and tolerance. Patients experience significant weight and FFM loss during treatment. Current TF regime attenuates weight loss but does not overcome loss of muscle mass and function during therapy. Future interventions should consider nutritional intake and additional strategies specifically targeting metabolism, loss of muscle mass, and function.

Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of GC4419 Versus Placebo to Reduce Severe Oral Mucositis Due to Concurrent Radiotherapy and Cisplatin For Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE

Oral mucositis (OM) remains a common, debilitating toxicity of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. The goal of this phase IIb, multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of GC4419, a superoxide dismutase mimetic, with placebo to reduce the duration, incidence, and severity of severe OM (SOM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 223 patients (from 44 institutions) with locally advanced oral cavity or oropharynx cancer planned to be treated with definitive or postoperative intensity-modulated RT (IMRT; 60 to 72 Gy [≥ 50 Gy to two or more oral sites]) plus cisplatin (weekly or every 3 weeks) were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg (n = 73) or 90 mg (n = 76) of GC4419 or to receive placebo (n = 74) by 60-minute intravenous administration before each IMRT fraction. WHO grade of OM was assessed biweekly during IMRT and then weekly for up to 8 weeks after IMRT. The primary endpoint was duration of SOM tested for each active dose level versus placebo (intent-to-treat population, two-sided α of .05). The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03, was used for adverse event grading.

RESULTS

Baseline patient and tumor characteristics as well as treatment delivery were balanced. With 90 mg GC4419 versus placebo, SOM duration was significantly reduced (P = .024; median, 1.5 v 19 days). SOM incidence (43% v 65%; P = .009) and severity (grade 4 incidence, 16% v 30%; P = .045) also were improved. Intermediate improvements were seen with the 30-mg dose. Safety was comparable across arms, with no significant GC4419-specific toxicity nor increase of known toxicities of IMRT plus cisplatin. The 2-year follow-up for tumor outcomes is ongoing.

CONCLUSION

GC4419 at a dose of 90 mg produced a significant, clinically meaningful reduction of SOM duration, incidence, and severity with acceptable safety. A phase III trial (ROMAN; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03689712) has begun.

Comparing high-dose cisplatin with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in definitive concurrent chemoradiation setting for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC)

BACKGROUND

High-dose cisplatin (Cis) is a preferred systemic agent for concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LAHNSCC) patients. As some patients are unable to tolerate Cis, this study compares the toxicity and efficacy of weekly cisplatin-paclitaxel (CP) regimen with Cis.

METHODS

Patients with LAHNSCC receiving definitive chemoradiation either with Cis (Cisplatin-100 mg/m² q3w x 3) or CP (Cisplatin-20 mg/m² ; Paclitaxel-30 mg/m² qw x7) were included.

RESULTS

Cis and CP groups were comprised of 114 and 111 subjects, respectively. Complete response for Cis versus CP groups was 88% versus 88%, respectively. Median follow-up for the study was 58.5 months. After adjusting for potential treatment selection bias, no significant differences were evident between Cis and CP groups for overall survival (hazard ratios [HR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.59-1.21, P = 0.36), progression free survival (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.62-1.24, P = 0.46), locoregional control (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.52-1.15, P = 0.21), and distant control (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.61-1.23, P = 0.42). Patients in the CP group had less acute and chronic toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly CP regimen can serve as an alternative systemic therapy with radiation in patients with LAHNSCC who are not fit for Cis.

Radiomics and Machine Learning for Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancers

Introduction: An increasing number of parameters can be considered when making decisions in oncology. Tumor characteristics can also be extracted from imaging through the use of radiomics and add to this wealth of clinical data. Machine learning can encompass these parameters and thus enhance clinical decision as well as radiotherapy workflow. Methods: We performed a description of machine learning applications at each step of treatment by radiotherapy in head and neck cancers. We then performed a systematic review on radiomics and machine learning outcome prediction models in head and neck cancers. Results: Machine Learning has several promising applications in treatment planning with automatic organ at risk delineation improvements and adaptative radiotherapy workflow automation. It may also provide new approaches for Normal Tissue Complication Probability models. Radiomics may provide additional data on tumors for improved machine learning powered predictive models, not only on survival, but also on risk of distant metastasis, in field recurrence, HPV status and extra nodal spread. However, most studies provide preliminary data requiring further validation. Conclusion: Promising perspectives arise from machine learning applications and radiomics based models, yet further data are necessary for their implementation in daily care.

Prognostic factors in patients with soft palate squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To define the prognostic factors associated with outcome in patients with soft palate squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

METHODS

Previously untreated patients with soft palate and uvula SCC treated in our institution between 1997 and 2012 were collected. The prognostic value of clinical, hematological, and treatment characteristics was examined.

RESULTS

We identified 156 patients, median age 58 years, with 71% drinkers, 91% smokers; 19% had synchronous cancer. Front-line treatment was chemoradiotherapy in 58 (37%), radiotherapy alone in 60 (39%), surgery in 17 (11%), and induction chemotherapy in 21 patients (14%). The 5-year actuarial overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 41% and 37%, respectively. In univariate analysis, T3-T4 vs T1-T2 stage, N2-N3 vs N0-N1 stage, and neutrophil count >7 g/L were associated with worse OS and PFS (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

In patients with soft palate SCC, inflammation biomarkers were associated with OS.

HPV, hypoxia and radiation response in head and neck cancer

Over the last decades, the incidence of human papilloma virus (HPV) positive head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has significantly increased. Infection with high-risk HPV types drives tumourigenesis through expression of the oncoproteins E6 and E7. Currently, the primary treatment of HNSCC consists of radiotherapy, often combined with platinum-based chemotherapeutics. One of the common features of HNSCC is the occurrence of tumour hypoxia, which impairs the efficacy of radiotherapy and is a negative prognostic factor. Therefore, it is important to detect and quantify the severity of hypoxia, as well as develop strategies to specifically target hypoxic tumours. HPV-positive tumours are remarkably radiosensitive compared to HPV-negative tumours and consequently the HPV-positive patients have a better prognosis. This provides an opportunity to elucidate mechanisms of radiation sensitivity, which may reveal targets for improved therapy for HPV-negative head and neck cancers. In this review, we will discuss the differences between HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck tumours and methods of hypoxia detection and targeting in these disease types. Particular emphasis will be placed on the mechanisms by which HPV infection impacts radiosensitivity.

Comparing outcomes of concurrent chemotherapy regimens in patients 65 years old or older with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The comparative efficacy of cisplatin (CDDP), carboplatin, and cetuximab (CTX) delivered concurrently with radiation for locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma continues to be evaluated.

METHODS

The linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to identify and compare patient and disease profiles, mortality, toxicity, and overall cost for patients with oropharynx cancer undergoing definitive concurrent chemoradiation with CDDP, carboplatin, or CTX between 2006 and 2011. The human papillomavirus status was unknown. The primary outcome was 2-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Four hundred nine patients receiving concurrent CDDP (n = 167), carboplatin (n = 69), or CTX (n = 173) were included. Those who were older, those who were nonwhite, and those with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2 were less likely to receive CDDP. Two-year OS was inferior with CTX (hazard ratio [HR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.60; P = .020) and no different with carboplatin (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.73-2.35; P = .362) in a Cox proportional hazards model (reference CDDP). There was no statistically significant difference between carboplatin and CTX (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.77-2.14; P = .891). Rates of antiemetic use and hospital visits for nausea/emesis/diarrhea or dehydration were statistically higher with CDDP. Pneumonia rates were higher with carboplatin. In the multivariate model, the corrected mean per-patient spending was significantly higher for CTX and carboplatin than CDDP ($61,133 and $65,721 vs $48,709).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received CDDP had improved OS. CDDP was also associated with slightly lower overall costs and higher antiemetic usage and hospital visit rates, although a strong selection bias was observed because those receiving CTX and carboplatin were older and had higher comorbidity scores.

Comparison of high-dose Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy and Cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy for p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the context of revised HPV-based staging

AIM

To perform a comparison of Cisplatin vs. Cetuximab in p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) in the context of the revised HPV-based staging.

BACKGROUND

Previous reports comparing these agents in head and neck cancer have included heterogenous disease and p16-status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted from 2006 to 2016 of patients with p16-positive OPSCC who underwent definitive radiotherapy concurrent with either triweekly Cisplatin (n = 251) or Cetuximab (n = 40). AJCC 8th Edition staging was adapted.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for surviving patients was 40 months. On multivariate analysis for all-comers, comparing Cisplatin and Cetuximab, 3-year locoregional recurrence (LRR): 6% vs. 16% (p = 0.07), 3-year distant metastasis (DM): 8% vs. 21% (p = 0.04), 3-year overall recurrence rate (ORR): 11% vs. 29% (p = 0.01), and 3-year cause-specific survival (CSS): 94% vs. 79% (p = 0.06), respectively. On stage-based subgroup analysis, for stage I-II disease, 3-year LRR: 5% vs. 10% (p = 0.51), 3-year DM: 7% vs. 16% (p = 0.32), 3-year ORR: 10% vs. 23% (p = 0.15), and 3-year CSS: 95% vs. 82% (p = 0.38). For stage III disease, 3-year LRR: 10% vs. 40% (p = 0.07), 3-year DM: 9% vs. 43% (p = 0.07), 3-year ORR: 15% vs. 55% (p = 0.04), and 3-year CSS: 94% vs. 57% (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

When given concurrently with radiotherapy, Cetuximab and triweekly Cisplatin demonstrated comparable efficacy for AJCC 8th Edition stage I-II p16-positive OPSCC. However, Cetuximab appeared to be associated with higher rates of treatment failure and cancer-related deaths in stage III disease. Upon availability of the RTOG 1016 trial results, analysis based on the revised HPV-based staging should be performed to confirm these findings.

Influence of tumor-associated macrophages and HLA class I expression according to HPV status in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemo/bioradiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the prognostic value of tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and HLA class I expression according to HPV status in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive radiotherapy combining cisplatin (CRT) or cetuximab (BRT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety-five patients were enrolled. The density of CD68+ cells and CD68+ CD163+ cells (further referred as M2) in the intraepithelial and the stromal compartments, respectively, as well as HLA class I expression in tumor cells, were evaluated semi-quantitatively. Correlations between biomarker expression and treatment outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed that the intraepithelial macrophage density (IEMD) was prognostic for favorable progression-free survival (PFS) and there was a non-significant trend for improved overall survival (OS). HLA class I down-regulation was not an independent prognostic factor. Subgroup analysis showed that in p16+ population, patients with high IEMD had improved 5-year PFS vs. patients with low IEMD (81.2% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001), while in p16- population, no difference was observed. Similarly, when stratified by primary tumor site, IEMD showed prognostic value in oropharyngeal cancer patients (OPC) but not non-OPC patients. Five-year PFS of patients with low stromal M2 macrophage density treated with CRT was significantly improved vs. those with BRT (54.5% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.03), while in tumors with high M2, there was no significant difference (50.3% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic role of TAM phenotype and distribution depends on HPV status and might predict treatment response. They prompt further validation in prospective studies.

Leukocytosis, prognosis biomarker in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients after chemoradiotherapy

Objective

To study the prognostic value of leukocyte increase in a retrospective cohort of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients receiving definitive concurrent cisplatin and radiation.

Materials and methods

Clinical records of consecutive previously untreated locally advanced HNSCC patients treated in our Institution between March 2006 and October 2012 by concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m², every 3 weeks) and radiation (70 Gy in 7 weeks) were collected. The prognostic value of pretreatment leukocyte increase was examined, with focus on patterns of relapse and survival. Leukocytosis and neutrophilia were defined as a leukocyte count or a neutrophils count exceeding 10 and 7.5 G/L, respectively.

Results

We identified 193 patients, all treated with concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. Respectively 24% and 20% patients displayed baseline leukocytosis or neutrophilia. Mean leukocyte count were significantly more elevated in current smokers, patients with performance status (PS) >0, T4 and less in HPV + tumor. The 5-year actuarial overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 56% and 51% respectively. In univariate analysis, both leukocytosis and neutrophilia were strongly associated with worse OS and PFS (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, N classification, HPV/p16, smoking status and leukocytosis were associated with worse OS and PFS. Patients with <3 cycles of cisplatin had worse survival.

Conclusion

In locally advanced HNSCC treated with concurrent cisplatin and radiation, baseline leukocytosis predicts OS and PFS. In addition with HPV status, this independent biomarker could help identifying patients with high risk of tumor relapse.

Inhibition of EphB4-Ephrin-B2 Signaling Enhances Response to Cetuximab-Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancers

Purpose: The clinical success of targeted therapies such as cetuximab and radiotherapy (RT) is hampered by the low response rates and development of therapeutic resistance. In the current study, we investigated the involvement of EphB4-ephrin-B2 protumorigenic signaling in mediating resistance to EGFR inhibition and RT in head and neck cancers.Experimental Design: We used patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and HNSCC cell lines to test our hypothesis. Tumor tissues were subjected to PhosphoRTK array, and Western blotting to detect changes in EphB4-ephrin-B2 targets. mRNA sequencing and microarray data analysis were performed on PDX tumors and HNSCC cell lines, respectively, to determine differences in gene expression of molecules involved in tumor cell growth, proliferation, and survival pathways. Effects on cell growth were determined by MTT assay on HNSCC cells downregulated for EphB4/ephrin-B2 expression, with and without EGFR inhibitor and radiation.Results: Our data from locally advanced HNSCC patients treated with standard-of-care definitive chemo-RT show elevated EphB4 and ephrin-B2 levels after failure of treatment. We observed significant response toward cetuximab and RT following EphB4-ephrin-B2 inhibition, resulting in improved survival in tumor-bearing mice. Tumor growth inhibition was accompanied by a decrease in the levels of proliferation and prosurvival molecules and increased apoptosis.Conclusions: Our findings underscore the importance of adopting rational drug combinations to enhance therapeutic effect. Our study documenting enhanced response of HNSCC to cetuximab-RT with EphB4-ephrin-B2 blockade has the potential to translate into the clinic to benefit this patient population. Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4539-50. ©2018 AACR.

Pharmacological modulation of radiation-induced oral mucosal complications

Radiation-induced mucositis is a common toxicity, especially in patients with head and neck cancers. Despite recent technological advances in radiation therapy, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, radiation-induced mucositis is still causing treatment disruptions, negatively affecting patients' long and short term quality of life, and impacting medical resources use with economic consequences. The objective of this article was to review the latest updates in the management of radiation-induced mucositis, with a focus on pharmaceutical strategies for the prevention or treatment of mucositis. Although numerous studies analysing the prevention and management of oral radiation-induced mucositis have been conducted, there are still few reliable data to guide daily clinical practice. Furthermore, most of the tested drugs have shown no (anti-inflammatory cytokine, growth factors) or limited (palifermin) effect. Therapies for acute oral mucositis are predominantly focused on improving oral hygiene and providing symptoms control. Although low-level laser therapy proved efficient in preventing radiation-induced oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer, this intervention requires equipment and trained medical staff, and is therefore insufficiently developed in clinical routine. New effective pharmacological agents able to prevent or reverse radio-induced mucositis are required.

The Cisplatin Total Dose and Concomitant Radiation in Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Any Recent Evidence for Dose Efficacy?

OPINION STATEMENT

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with high-dose (100 mg/m²), single-agent cisplatin is considered the standard of care for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC). Poor compliance often due to significant treatment-related toxicities observed during CRT regimen has stimulated research efforts to examine for evidence of the optimal cumulative cisplatin dose and schedule. The findings from this systematic literature review demonstrate that there are insufficient prospective, randomized controlled data to determine the optimal total dose (and schedule) of cisplatin to administer concomitantly with radiotherapy in the treatment of LAHNC. Given the clinical challenges associated with administering concurrent CRT with single-agent high-dose cisplatin, as well as the long-term toxicities accompanying this treatment, an examination of the available literature for evidence of dose efficacy is of continued clinical interest. Moving forward, it is critical that researchers include complete descriptions of key disease and treatment variables (i.e. treatment compliance and HPV status) to inform and strengthen clinical decisions. The substantial heterogeneity of LAHNC has led to the focus of recent research efforts to risk-stratify using a combination of clinical and molecular markers (e.g. HPV status). Thus, the optimal total dose (and schedule) of cisplatin may need to be modified to reflect the specific characteristics of the individual patient subpopulations being treated. At present, CRT remains the standard of care for LAHNC, but this field is rapidly evolving. National and international clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate treatment de-intensification in favourable risk patient subsets and treatment intensification in poor-risk patient subsets, these will provide evidence-based guidance to individualize therapy with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes.

A comparison of concurrent cisplatin versus cetuximab with radiotherapy in locally-advanced head and neck cancer: A bi-institutional analysis

AIM

To present our experience comparing cisplatin- and cetuximab-based radiotherapy for locally-advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND

The comparative effectiveness of cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy (BRT) for locally-advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) continues to be explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Outcomes of LAHNSCC patients treated with CRT (125) or BRT (34) at two institutions were compared retrospectively, with attention to overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), locoregional control (LRC), and distant control (DC). Univariate analysis (UVA) using Cox regression was performed to explore the association of intervention with survival and disease control, and multivariate (MVA) Cox regression was then performed to assess the association of intervention with survival.

RESULTS

There were significant baseline differences between the CRT and BRT groups with respect to age, race, performance status, N-classification, tobacco history, and human papillomavirus status. UVA demonstrated inferiority of BRT versus CRT with respect to both OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.19, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.03-4.63, p = 0.04) and CSS (HR 3.33, 95%CI 1.42-7.78, p < 0.01), but non-significantly different outcomes in LRC (HR 0.99, 95%CI 0.37-2.61, p = 0.98) and DC (HR 2.01, 95%CI 0.78-5.37, p = 0.14). On MVA, there was no significant OS difference between interventions (HR 1.19, 95%CI 0.42-3.35, p = 0.74); there were too few events for the other outcomes to draw meaningful conclusions with MVA.

CONCLUSIONS

In our retrospective analysis, patients undergoing CRT experienced improved OS and CSS over those receiving BRT; however, disease control did not significantly differ. These findings may inform management of LAHNSCC patients.

Clinical relevance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 expression and correlation with HPV/p16 in head and neck cancer treated with bio- or chemo-radiotherapy

To investigate the prognostic value of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs: CD8+ and FoxP3+), and PD-L1 expression in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with radiotherapy combined with cisplatin (CRT) or cetuximab (BRT). Immunohistochemistry for CD8, FoxP3 was performed on pretreatment tissue samples of 77 HNSCC patients. PD-L1 results were evaluable in 38 patients. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the correlations of these biomarkers expression with clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes. High CD8+ TILs level was identified in multivariate analysis (MVA) as an independent prognostic factor for improved progression-free survival with a non-significant trend for better overall survival (OS). High FoxP3+ TILs and PD-L1+ correlated with a favorable OS in the uni-variate analysis, respectively, but not in the MVA. In subgroup analysis, CD8+TILs appear to play a pivotal role, p16+/high CD8+TILs patients had superior 5-year OS compared with p16+/low CD8+TILs, p16-/ high CD8+TILs, and p16-/ low CD8+TILs patients. p16+/PD-L1+ patients had improved 3-year OS compared with p16+/PD-L1-, p16-/ PD-L1+, and p16-/ PD-L1- patients. In low CD8+ TILs tumors, 5-year loco-regional control of patients treated with CRT was improved vs. those with BRT (p = 0.01) while no significant difference in high CD8+ TILs was observed. CD8+ TILs correlated with an improved clinical outcome in HNSCC patients independent of Human papillomavirus status. The immunobiomarkers may provide information for selecting suitable patients for cisplatin or cetuximab treatment. Additionally, the impact of TILs and PD-L1 of deciphering among the p16+ population a very favorable outcome population could be of interest for patients tailored approaches.

Predictive and prognostic value of CT based radiomics signature in locally advanced head and neck cancers patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy or bioradiotherapy and its added value to Human Papillomavirus status

OBJECTIVES

To explore prognostic and predictive value of radiomics in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (LAHNSCC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or bioradiotherapy (BRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 120 patients (CRT vs. BRT matched 2:1) were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 544 radiomics features of the primary tumor were extracted from radiotherapy planning computed tomography scans. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between survival and radiomics features with false discovery rate correction. The discriminatory performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed a 24-feature based signature significantly predicted for OS (HR=0.3, P=0.02) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.3, P=0.01). Combining the radiomics signature with p16 status showed a significant improvement of prognostic performance compared with p16 (AUC=0.78vs. AUC=0.64 at 5years, P=0.01) or radiomics signature (AUC=0.78vs. AUC=0.67, P=0.01) alone. When patients were stratified according to this combination, OS and PFS were significantly different according to the 4 sub-types (p16+ with low/high signature score; p16- with low/high signature score) (P<0.001). Patients with high signature score significantly benefited from CRT (vs. BRT) in terms of OS (P=0.004), while no benefit from CRT in patients with low signature score.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests an added value of radiomics features as prognostic and predictive biomarker in HNSCC treated with CRT/BRT. Moreover, the radiomics signature provided additional information to HPV/p16 status to further stratify patients. External validation of such findings is mandatory given the risk of overfitting.

Survival, recurrence and toxicity of HNSCC in comparison of a radiotherapy combination with cisplatin versus cetuximab: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin-based treatment has been considered the standard treatment regimen of HNSCC. Cetuximab is an emerging target therapy that has potential therapeutic benefits over cisplatin. Nevertheless, curative effects of cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy (BRT) are still controversial.

METHODS

Potentially eligible studies were retrieved using PubMed, Embase and Medline. Basic characteristics of patients and statistical data were collected. A meta-analysis model was established to compare CRT and BRT.

RESULTS

Thirty-one eligible studies and 4212 patients were found. The pooled HRs with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for OS and PFS were 0.32 [0.09, 0.55] and 0.51 [0.22, 0.80], respectively, and both were in favor of cisplatin. However, 3-year survival and recurrence analysis of the subgroups showed no differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). In subgroup analysis, oropharyngeal primary tumors exhibited improved results by cetuximab with a pooled HR of 1.56 [1.14, 2.13] for PFS. Additionally, the HPV+ status was a significant factor in positive outcomes with cetuximab with a pooled HR of 1.12 [0.46, 2.17] for OS.

CONCLUSION

Long-term use of BRT showed no significant difference compared with CRT, and both arms showed different aspects of toxicity. In subgroup analysis, taking the effects of treatment and adverse events into consideration, cetuximab plus radiation may show superior responses regarding OS and PFS in patients who have HPV+ or primary oropharyngeal HNSCC, respectively, but physicians should administer them with caution.

EGFR monoclonal antibodies in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: What is their current role?

Treatment options for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) include either surgical resection followed by radiation or chemoradiation, or definitive chemoradiation for which single-agent cisplatin is the best studied and established. The increasing understanding of the molecular biology of SCCHN has led to an interest in the development of targeted therapies. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is over-expressed in nearly 80-90% of cases of SCCHN and correlates with poor prognosis and resistance to radiation. Preclinical evidence showed that blocking EGFR restores radiation sensitivity and enhances cytotoxicity. This finding led to clinical trials evaluating this class of agents and the approval of cetuximab in combination with radiation for the treatment of locally advanced SCCHN. This review is focused on the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and their role either with radiotherapy or chemoradiation in unresectable LA SCCHN.

Real-life assessment of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) toxicity in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates the feasibility of VMAT in association with platin or cetuximab in HNSCC and reports VMAT-related acute and late toxicities for the first time.

OBJECTIVES

New radiotherapy techniques, such as Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) were developed to lower RT-related toxicity. The aim of the present study was to investigate acute and late toxicities of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients treated using VMAT.

METHODS

This study investigated retrospectively all patients with HNSCC who received VMAT in curative intent.

RESULTS

From 2010-2013, 150 patients were treated. Seventy-five patients (50%) received concurrent chemotherapy with VMAT, 51 patients (34%) received VMAT alone and 24 patients (16%) received concurrent cetuximab with VMAT. Mean delivered dose to planning target volume tumor (PTV T), high risk nodes (PTV HNR), low risk nodes (PTV LNR) and prophylactic nodes (PTV PN) were: 65.2 Gy, 62.9 Gy, 55.4 Gy, and 51.5 Gy, respectively. PTV mean coverages were higher than 96.5%. Most common grade 3/4 acute infield toxicities were mucosis (n = 28, 19%), dysphagia (n = 24, 16%), and dermatitis (n = 24, 16%). With a median follow-up of 16.0 months, most common late toxicities were dysphagia (n = 30, 20%), xerostomia (n = 28, 19%), larynx stiff (n = 17, 11%), and skin fibrosis (n = 14, 9%).

Re-irradiation with cetuximab or cisplatin-based chemotherapy for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

PURPOSE

Locoregional recurrence remains the main pattern of failure after primary combined modality treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We compared the efficacy and toxicity of either cisplatin or cetuximab in combination with re-irradiation (ReRT) for recurrent unresectable SCCHN. Various clinicopathological factors were investigated to establish a prognostic score.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2007 and 2014, 66 patients with recurrent SCCHN originating in a previously irradiated area received cetuximab (n = 33) or cisplatin-based chemotherapy (n = 33) concomitant with ReRT. Toxicity was evaluated weekly and at every follow-up visit. Physical examination, endoscopy, CT or MRI scans were used to evaluate response and disease control.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 18.3 months, the 1-year overall survival (OS) rates for Re-RT with cetuximab and cisplatin-based chemotherapy were 44.4 and 45.5% (p = 0.352), respectively. At 1 year, local control rates (LCR) were 46.4 and 54.2% (p = 0.625), freedom from metastases (FFM) rates 73.6 and 81% (p = 0.842), respectively. Haematological toxicity ≥ grade 3 occurred more often in the cisplatin group (p < 0.001), pain ≥ grade 3 was increased in the cetuximab group (p = 0.034). A physiological haemoglobin level and a longer interval between primary RT and ReRT, proved to be significant prognostic factors for OS (multivariate: p = 0.003, p = 0.002, respectively). Site of the recurrence and gross target volume (GTV) did not show a significant impact on OS in multivariate analysis (p = 0.160, p = 0.167, respectively). A prognostic-score (1-4 points) based on these four variables identified significantly different subgroups: 1-year OS for 0/1/2/3/4 prognostic points: 10, 38, 76, 80 and 100%, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both cetuximab- and cisplatin-based ReRT of SCCHN recurrences are feasible and effective treatment options with comparable results in terms of tumour control and survival. Acute adverse events may differ slightly. Our prognostic score could help to identify appropriate patients for ReRT and stratify patients within future clinical trials.