Management of blunt liver injury: what is new?

Limited Diagnostic Value of miRNAs in Early Trauma-Induced Liver Injury: Only miRNA-122 Emerges as a Late-Phase Marker

Background/Objectives: Liver injury is common after abdominal trauma. However, the established biomarkers of liver injury, such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lack accuracy. This study investigates whether specific liver-related microRNAs (miRNAs) are released into the circulation in trauma patients with liver injury and whether they can indicate liver damage in the early phase after major trauma. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data and blood samples from 26 trauma patients was conducted. The levels of miRNA-21-5p, -122-5p, -191-5p, -192-3p, and -212-3p were measured in patients with computed tomography-confirmed liver trauma (LT group, n = 12) and polytrauma patients without liver trauma (PT group, n = 14) upon emergency room (ER) admission, and 24 and 48 h after trauma. Additionally, liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) was measured, as it has recently been discussed in the context of abdominal trauma. Results: Only miRNA-122-5p showed a significant increase in the LT group compared to the PT group, but only at the 48 h time point (p = 0.032). Conversely, L-FABP (p = 0.018) and ALT (p = 0.05) were significantly elevated in the LT group compared to the PT group at the time of ER admission. There was a moderate correlation between miRNA-122-5p and AISAbdomen (p = 0.056) and transfused red blood cell concentrates (p = 0.055). L-FABP correlated strongly with the ALT levels (p = 0.0009) and the length of stay in the ICU (p = 0.0086). Conclusions: In this study, the liver-specific miRNA-122-5p did not effectively indicate liver injury in the early acute post-traumatic phase. Future research with a large sample size should investigate whether other miRNAs can more accurately predict liver injury and the extent of hepatocellular injury, particularly in the acute post-traumatic phase.

Contained hepatic vascular injuries following liver trauma: a retrospective monocentric study and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Over the past 30 years, there has been a major shift in the management of liver trauma. Contained hepatic vascular injuries (CHVI), including pseudoaneurysms and arteriovenous fistulas, are often feared because of the risk of secondary hemorrhage. However, little is known about CHVI. There are no guidelines for their management. Our aim was to validate the risk factors for CHVI, to identify the associated morbidities, and to establish a management protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 318 liver trauma cases from a level 1 trauma center over the past 15 years, comparing the presence or absence of CHVI. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted. The treatment used to manage CHVI was also compared.

RESULTS

Liver trauma with the following characteristics, AAST grade ≥III, bilateral injuries, and laceration-type lesions, were associated with a higher risk of CHVI. Grade AAST ≥III and bilateral injuries were confirmed in a multivariable study with odds ratios as high as 4.0 and 3.5, respectively. CHVI was associated with significantly more delayed bleeding and controlled computed tomography. After analyzing the noninterventional management of CHVI less than 2 cm, a management algorithm is proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective unicentric study and literature review provide additional insight into the patient profile at risk for developing CHVI, its associated morbidity, and its management.

[Management of Injuries to the Parenchymal Abdominal Organs]

The most common organs affected by abdominal trauma are the spleen and the liver, often in combination. Pancreatic injuries are rare. In the case of blunt abdominal trauma, which is much more common, a clinical and laboratory examination as well as sonography should be performed. In the initial assessment, the circulatory situation must be screened. If there is haemodynamic instability and presentation of free fluid, an emergency laparotomy is indicated. If the situation is stable or stabilised and a pathological sonography is present, it is essential to perform triphasic contrast enhanced computed tomography, which is also mandatory in polytraumatised patients. If a renal injury is suspected, a late venous phase should be attached. In addition to the classification of the injury, attention should be paid to possible vascular injury or active bleeding. In this case, angiography with the possibility of intervention should be performed. Endoscopic treatment is possible for injuries of the pancreatic duct. If the imaging does not reveal any intervention target and a circulation is stable, a conservative approach is possible with continuous monitoring using clinical, laboratory and sonographic controls. Most injuries can be successfully treated by non-operative management (NOM).There are various surgical options for treating the injury, such as local and resecting procedures. There is also the option of "damage control surgery" with acute bleeding control and second look. Complex surgical procedures should be performed at centres. Postoperative complications arise out of elective surgery.In the less common case of penetrating abdominal trauma, the actual extent of the injury cannot be estimated from the visible wound. Here again, the circulatory situation determines the next steps. An emergency laparotomy should be carried out in case of instability. If the condition is stable, further diagnostics should be performed using contrast enhanced computed tomography. If penetration through the peritoneum cannot be clearly excluded, diagnostic laparoscopy should be performed.

Spleen autotransplantation on liver versus greater omentum for simultaneous injuries of liver and spleen: an experimental study

Purpose

In a simulated situation of simultaneous spleen and liver trauma, we aimed to compare the outcomes of treating both injuries with spleen autotransplantation on the omentum (SAO) alongside hepatorrhaphy versus spleen autotransplantation as a patch on the liver parenchyma.

Methods

A total of 24 rats were separated into two groups: the SAO and the spleen autotransplantation on the liver. They underwent a uniform and simultaneous procedure involving full-thickness injuries to the left lobe of the liver and grade 4 spleen injuries. We measured hemoglobin, white blood cell (WBC), complement (C3 and C4), and immunoglobulin G, M, and A (IgG, IgM, IgA) levels before and 4 weeks after the surgery. We utilized Technetium-99m scintigraphy to evaluate the posttransplant splenic graft functions 4 weeks after the surgery.

Results

The two groups had no significant difference in the hematologic and immunologic factors before surgery. However, both procedures significantly reduced hemoglobin, C3, IgG, and IgA levels (all P<0.05). WBC counts significantly increased in the SAO group, whereas the IgM level decreased after the intervention (P<0.05). WBC was increased in the SAO group, while IgM and IgA were decreased in the SAO group. The Technetium uptake was similar between the two groups (P=0.3).

Conclusions

In simultaneous spleen and liver injuries, the autotransplantation of splenic into the liver parenchyma appears to be a promising surgical approach for preserving spleen function and hepatorrhaphy at the same time instead of doing them separately.

Use of angioembolization, treatment modalities and mortality in association with blunt liver trauma in Germany - a data analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®

PURPOSE

Angioembolization (ANGIO) is highly valued in national and international guideline recommendations as a treatment adjunct with blunt liver trauma (BLT). The literature on BLT shows that treatment, regardless of the severity of liver injury, can be accomplished with a high success rate using nonoperative management (NOM). An indication for surgical therapy (SURG) is only seen in hemodynamically instable patients. For Germany, it is unclear how frequently NOM ± ANGIO is actually used, and what mortality is associated with BLT.

METHODS

A retrospective systematic data analysis of patients with BLT from the TraumaRegister DGU® was performed. All patients with liver injury AIS ≥ 2 between 2015 and 2020 were included. The focus was to evaluate the use ANGIO as well as treatment selection (NOM vs. SURG) and mortality in relation to liver injury severity. Furthermore, independent risk factors influencing mortality were identified, using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 2353 patients with BLT were included in the analysis. ANGIO was used in 18 cases (0.8%). NOM was performed in 70.9% of all cases, but mainly in less severe liver trauma (AIS ≤ 2, abbreviated injury scale). Liver injuries AIS ≥ 3 were predominantly treated surgically (64.6%). Overall mortality associated with BLT was 16%. Severity of liver injury ≥ AIS 3, age > 60 years, hemodynamic instability (INSTBL), and mass transfusion (≥ 10 packed red blood cells/pRBC) were identified as independent risk factors contributing to mortality in BLT.

CONCLUSION

ANGIO is rarely used in BLT, contrary to national and international guideline recommendations. In Germany, liver injuries AIS ≥ 3 are still predominantly treated surgically. BLT is associated with considerable mortality, depending on the presence of specific contributing risk factors.

[Management and treatment of liver injuries after blunt abdominal trauma]

The liver is involved in about 20% of cases of blunt abdominal trauma. The management of liver trauma has changed significantly in the past three decades towards conservative treatment. Up to 80% of all liver trauma patients can now be successfully treated by nonoperative management. Decisive for this is the adequate screening and assessment of the patient and the injury pattern as well as the provision of the appropriate infrastructure. Hemodynamically unstable patients require immediate exploratory surgery. In hemodynamically stable patients, a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) should be performed. If active bleeding is detected angiographic imaging and embolization should be performed to stop the bleeding. Even after initially successful conservative management of liver trauma, subsequent complications can occur that make surgical inpatient treatment necessary.

Improvement of mortality in severe liver injury after trauma center implementation: a propensity score matched study

PURPOSE

To evaluate changes in the management and outcome of severe liver injury after trauma center implementation.

METHODS

Trauma patients with severe liver injury (organ injury scale score ≥ 4) treated between January 2011 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A trauma center was built in 2016 at our institution, and patients were dichotomized into two groups: before trauma center (BTC) and after trauma center (ATC) group. Treatment methods and outcomes were compared between the groups with 1:1 propensity score matching.

RESULTS

We included 50 patients in the BTC group and 104 patients in the ATC group. Patients in the ATC group had frequent utilization of angiography (16% vs 47.1%, p < 0.001), faster transfusion [84 (37-152) min vs 17 (10-79) min, p < 0.001], and less fluid administration within 24 h [8.3 (5.7-13.7) L vs 5.7 (3.1-10.1) L, p = 0.002]. However, mortality rate was not significantly different between the groups (26.0% vs 20.2%, p = 0.416). 1:1 propensity score matching was performed using the variables of age, injury severity score, systolic blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale, and initial base excess level. After matching, the mortality rate (26.0% vs 10.0%, p = 0.037) and ventilator application (74.0% vs 54.0%, p = 0.037) significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

Severe liver injury management improved after trauma center implementation.

Re-visiting Drain Use in Operative Liver Trauma: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the liver being one of the most frequently injured abdominal organs in trauma patients, clinical management strategies differ between trauma surgeons. Few studies have critically evaluated current practice patterns in the operative management of liver trauma. Historical studies recommended against the use of drains but there has not been a modern investigation of this issue. The objective of this study was to analyze outcomes associated with intra-operative drain use for liver trauma.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all adult trauma patients presenting to a Level I trauma center from 2012 to 2018 was performed. Patients who underwent operative management of liver trauma were divided into groups based on whether an intra-abdominal drain was utilized and differences in outcomes between the groups were analyzed. The primary endpoint evaluated was post-operative intra-abdominal abscesses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

184 patients with operative management of liver trauma were included in the study. Closed suction drains were utilized in 26.1% of post-operative patients. Rate of intra-abdominal abscesses was significantly higher in the drain group (35.4% versus 8.8%, P < 0.001). Drains were more commonly used in patients receiving more units of PRBCs (median, 9 units [IQR 4-20] versus median 5.5 units, [IQR 2-14], P = 0.03). Drain use was found to be an independent risk factor for post-operative intra-abdominal abscess on multivariate analysis (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.7-14, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study support previous conclusions that drain placement for operative liver trauma is associated with increased risks of infectious complications. Drains were used in patients with more severe liver injury, intra-operative bile leaks, penetrating trauma, and increased blood transfusion requirements. Future studies should focus on the development of specific guidelines for the use of drains in liver trauma.

Accident-related hepatic trauma in a medical clinical center in eastern China: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The treatment of hepatic injury can be complex. Medical clinical centers are often the first line hospitals for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatic trauma in China. The aim of the study is to summarize the experience in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatic trauma in one medical clinical center in China.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with hepatic trauma admitted between January 2002 and December 2019 at the Xishan People's Hospital of Wuxi. The outcomes were cure rate and death within 14 days post-discharge.

RESULTS

Among the 318 patients with hepatic trauma, 146 patients underwent surgical treatment, and 172 received conservative treatment; three patients were transferred to other hospitals for further treatment; 283 patients were cured, and 35 died. Severe hepatic trauma occurred in 74 patients, with a mortality rate of 31.1% and accounting for 65.7% of total mortality. American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading ≥ III (OR = 3.51, 95%CI: 1.32-9.37, P = 0.012) and multiple organ injury (OR = 7.51, 95%CI: 2.51-22.46, P < 0.001) were independently associated with death. Among patients with AAST grading ≥ III, surgery was an independent protective factor for death (OR = 0.08, 95%CI: 0.01-0.45, P = 0.004). Among patients with ASST ≥ III and who underwent surgery, age (OR = 5.29, 95%CI: 1.37-20.33, P = 0.015) and peri-hepatic packing (PHP) (OR = 5.54, 95%CI: 1.43-21.487, P = 0.013) were independently associated with death.

CONCLUSIONS

AAST grading ≥ III and multiple organ injury were independently associated with death. Among patients with AAST grading ≥ III, surgery was an independent protective factor for death. Among patients with ASST ≥ III and who underwent surgery, age and PHP were independently associated with death.

Hepatic Pseudoaneurysm Incidence After Liver Trauma

BACKGROUND

Posttraumatic hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm is a potentially devastating complication after complex liver injury. Increasing computed tomography (CT) use may lead to more frequent identification of posttraumatic hepatic complications. This study was designed to determine the rate of hepatic pseudoaneurysm after traumatic liver injury.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients at an urban level 1 trauma center over 5 y (2012-2016). Injury characteristics, patient management, and complications were extracted from trauma registry data and chart review.

RESULTS

Six hundred thirty-four hepatic injuries (11 no grade/no CT, 159 grade I, 154 grade II, 165 grade III, 93 grade IV, and 52 grade V) were identified from our trauma registry. No patient with a grade I or II injury had a subsequent bleeding complication. Eighteen patients had a documented hepatic pseudoaneurysm: grade III n = 3 (1.8%), grade IV n = 6 (6.5%), grade V n = 9 (17.3%). The median time to pseudoaneurysm identification was 6.5 d. Seven pseudoaneurysms were found on asymptomatic surveillance CT-angiography on average 5 d after injury. Eleven patients were symptomatic at the time of CT-angiography performed at a median of 9 d after admission. Of the 11 symptomatic patients, four were in hemorrhagic shock, and two died from hepatic-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm increases with higher grade liver injury. Aggressive surveillance for hepatic pseudoaneurysm with interval CT-angiography 5-7 d postinjury may be warranted, especially for grade IV and V injuries.

Early surgical management of severe liver trauma with vascular complication can lead to early discharge

Intrahepatic arterio-portal fistulas are rare complications of blunt hepatic trauma. We describe a case of a 35-year-old male sustaining blunt abdominal trauma resulting in a grade IV liver injury complicated by arterio-portal fistula, portal venous pseudoaneurysm and concomitant bile duct injury. Although arterial embolisation is the mainstay of treatment for arterio-portal fistula, we describe a rationale for early involvement of a hepatobiliary surgeon for multidisciplinary management. Hepatic resection for acute hepatic trauma can, in selected cases, promptly manage all elements of portal triad injury, and in this particular case facilitated early uncomplicated discharge.

Bicycle handlebar injury in a child resulting in complex liver laceration with massive bleeding and bile leakage: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Bicycle accidents are a significant cause of traumatic morbidity in the paediatric population. The handlebar injuries are usually isolated and remain a major source of bicycle related morbidity. We present a case of severe liver laceration with left hepatic duct transection caused by handlebar trauma in a 13-year-old boy.

CASE PRESENTATION

An otherwise healthy 13-year-old Caucasian male patient was rushed to the hospital following a blunt abdominal trauma from a bicycle handlebar. An ultrasound revealed extensive free intraperitoneal fluid with accompanying features of hemodynamic instability. Operative findings included massive haemoperitoneum, a deep laceration almost separating left and right liver lobes, and a near-complete interruption of the left hepatic duct. Interestingly, the vascular anatomy of the left liver lobe was preserved. After haemostasis was established a duct-to-duct anastomosis of the ruptured left hepatic duct was performed. A T-tube biliary drainage was inserted, and intraoperative cholangiography showed no extraluminal spillage of contrast. During the recovery phase, cholangiography was performed several times revealing leakage from left hepatic duct. The leakage was managed conservatively and finally stopped.

DISCUSSION

Management of blunt hepatic injuries has remarkably changed from mandatory operation to mostly nonoperative interventions with selective operative management. Hemodynamic instability remains the main reason for exploratory laparotomy. Near-isolated laceration of main hepatic ducts is an extremely rare finding, and immediate reconstruction is the best option if an experienced surgeon is available.

CONCLUSION

Due to limited evidence, we recommend consultation with an experienced HPB surgeon on a case-by-case basis for every paediatric biliary injury.

Risk factors and management of different types of biliary injuries in blunt abdominal trauma: Single-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Biliary injuries after blunt abdominal traumas are uncommon and difficult to be predicted for early management. The aim of this study is to analyze the risk factors and management of biliary injuries with blunt abdominal trauma.

METHOD

Patients with blunt liver trauma in the period between 2009 to May 2019 were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups for comparison; a group of liver parenchymal injury and group with traumatic biliary injuries (TBI).

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients had blunt liver trauma (46 patients with liver parenchymal injury and 62 patients with TBI). TBI were; 55 patients with bile leak, 3 patients with haemobilia, and 4 patients with late obstructive jaundice. Eight patients with major bile leak and 12 patients with minor bile leak had been resolved with a surgical drain or percutaneous pigtail drainage. Nineteen patients (34.5%) with major and minor bile leak underwent successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Sixteen patients (29.1%) underwent surgical repair for bile leak. In Multivariate analysis, the possible risk factors for prediction of biliary injuries were central liver injuries (P = 0.032), high grades liver trauma (P = 0.046), elevated serum level of bilirubin at time of admission (P = 0.019), and elevated gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) at time of admission (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

High-grade liver trauma, central parenchymal laceration and elevated serum level of bilirubin and GGT are possible risk factors for the prediction of TBI. Bile leak after blunt trauma can be treated conservatively, while ERCP is indicated after failure of external drainage.

Risk factors and management of different types of biliary injuries in blunt abdominal trauma: Single-center retrospective cohort study

Background

Biliary injuries after blunt abdominal traumas are uncommon and difficult to be predicted for early management. The aim of this study is to analyze the risk factors and management of biliary injuries with blunt abdominal trauma.

Method

Patients with blunt liver trauma in the period between 2009 to May 2019 were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups for comparison; a group of liver parenchymal injury and group with traumatic biliary injuries (TBI).

Results

One hundred and eight patients had blunt liver trauma (46 patients with liver parenchymal injury and 62 patients with TBI). TBI were; 55 patients with bile leak, 3 patients with haemobilia, and 4 patients with late obstructive jaundice. Eight patients with major bile leak and 12 patients with minor bile leak had been resolved with a surgical drain or percutaneous pigtail drainage. Nineteen patients (34.5%) with major and minor bile leak underwent successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Sixteen patients (29.1%) underwent surgical repair for bile leak. In Multivariate analysis, the possible risk factors for prediction of biliary injuries were central liver injuries (P = 0.032), high grades liver trauma (P = 0.046), elevated serum level of bilirubin at time of admission (P = 0.019), and elevated gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) at time of admission (P = 0.017).

Conclusion

High-grade liver trauma, central parenchymal laceration and elevated serum level of bilirubin and GGT are possible risk factors for the prediction of TBI. Bile leak after blunt trauma can be treated conservatively, while ERCP is indicated after failure of external drainage.

New hemostatic device for grade IV-V liver injury in porcine model: a proof of concept

BACKGROUND

The liver is the most injured organ following abdominal trauma. Uncontrolled bleeding remains the main cause of early liver injury-related death, with a mortality rate of 50-54% in the first 24 h after admission and with 80% of operative deaths. Packing and reoperation account for the increased survival in severe liver trauma, and they are recommended for severe liver injuries (grades IV-V).Perihepatic packing can lead to several potential complications. An excessive packing can cause complications due to abdominal compartment syndrome, while a soft packing may be ineffective, and thus, bleeding can continue inadvertently with the consequent hypovolemic shock and potentially death.

METHODS

We designed a new vacuum-based device to perform perihepatic packing without the negative side-effects of the classic technique. We conducted a prospective pilot feasibility study in a porcine model. We compared the traditional perihepatic packing (PHP) (n = 2) with the new VacBagPack device (VBP) (n = 2).

RESULTS

Both pigs survived with the new device and showed an equivalent outcome to the one that survived in the traditional technique group. Blood tests were similar too. This suggests that VBP could be at least as effective as traditional PHP.

CONCLUSIONS

We establish a first step towards the development of a new packing device. A new study with a bigger sample size still in pigs will be conducted. Also, an industrial model of the device is currently in production.

Trends in the Nature and Management of Serious Abdominal Trauma

BACKGROUND

There have been recommendations for increased non-operative management (NOM) of abdominal trauma in adults. To assess the impact of this trend and changes in the epidemiology of trauma, we examined the management of serious abdominal injuries and mortality, in Victorian major trauma patients 16 years or older, between 2007 and 2016.

METHODS

Using data from the population-based Victorian Trauma Registry, characteristics of patients who underwent laparotomy, embolisation, laparotomy and embolisation, or NOM, were compared with the Chi-square test. Poisson regression was used to determine whether the incidence of serious abdominal injury changed over time. Temporal trends in the management of abdominal injury and in-hospital mortality were analysed using, respectively, the Chi-square test for trend, and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 2385 patients with serious abdominal injuries, 69% (n = 1649) had an intervention; predominantly a laparotomy (n = 1166). The proportion undergoing laparotomy decreased from 60% in 2007 to 44% in 2016 (p < 0.001), whilst embolisation increased from 6 to 20% (p < 0.001). Population-adjusted incidence of abdominal injury increased 1.6% per year (IRR 1.016, 95% CI 1.002-1.031; p < 0.024), predominantly in people aged 65 years and over (4.6% per year). Adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality declined 6.0% per year (adjusted odds ratio 0.94; 95% CI 0.89, 1.00; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst the incidence of major abdominal trauma increased during the study period, there was a reduction in the proportion of patients managed with laparotomy and reduction in the adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality. Older patients, for whom management is influenced by the complex interplay of frailty and co-morbidities, had lower laparotomy rates.

Clinical outcomes of primary arterial embolization in severe hepatic trauma: A systematic review

PURPOSE

This purpose of this systematic review was to determine the safety and efficacy of arterial embolization as the primary treatment for grade III-V liver trauma, excluding the postoperative use of arterial embolization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 24 studies published between January 2000 and June 2018 qualified for inclusion in this study. Four of them were prospective studies and 20 were retrospective. A total of 3855 patients (mean age, 33.5 years; range: 22-52.5 years) were treated non-operatively and 659 patients (659/3855; 17.09%) with hepatic hemorrhage underwent primary arterial embolization from 2000 to 2017. Indication for arterial embolization was a contrast blush visible on computed tomography in hemodynamically stable patient in all studies.

RESULTS

The arterial embolization success rate ranged from 80% to 97%. The most commonly reported complication was bile leak, with an incidence of 5.7%. Nineteen bilomas (2.8%) were reported in five studies with a range between 4% and 45%. Hepatic ischemia was reported in eight studies, with a mean incidence of 8.6%.

CONCLUSION

Primary arterial embolization has a high success rate in patients with hepatic trauma. Complications, including biloma and hepatic ischemia, have acceptable rates in the context of a minimally-invasive procedure that allows stabilization of life-threatening, complex liver injuries.

Blunt liver trauma: a descriptive analysis from a level I trauma center

Background

We aimed to review liver injury experience in a level 1 trauma center; namely clinical presentation, grading, management approach and clinical outcomes.

Methods

It is a retrospective analysis to include all blunt liver injury patients who were admitted at the Level 1 trauma center over a 3-year period. Data were compared and analyzed based on the liver injury grades and management approaches.

Results

Blunt liver injury accounted for 38% of the total blunt abdominal trauma cases with a mean age of 31 ± 13 years. Liver injury grade II (44.7%) was most common followed by grade I (28.8%), grade III (19.1%), grade IV (7.0%) and grade V (0.4%). Blood transfusion was more frequently required in patients with grade IV (p = 0.04). Out of 257 patients with blunt liver trauma, 198 were initially treated conservatively, that was successful in 192 (97%), whereas it failed in 6 (3%) patients due to delayed bleeding from hepatic hematoma, associated splenic rupture and small bowel injury which mandate surgical intervention. Fifty-nine patients (23%) underwent emergent surgery in terms of packing, resection debridement, left lobe hepatectomy and splenectomy. Hepatic complications included biloma, pseudoaneurysm and massive liver necrosis. Subanalysis of data using the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification revealed 19 patients were categorized as a WSES grade IV who needed surgical intervention without having an initial computerized tomography scanning. The overall mortality was 7.8% which was comparable among the conservative and operative group.

Conclusions

In our center, low grade liver injury in young males prevails. NOM is successful even for high graded injuries. All conservatively treated patients with high-grade liver injuries should be closely monitored for signs of failure of the non-operative management. Introducing the new WSES classification makes clear how is important the hemodynamic status of the patients despite the lesion. However, further larger prospective and multicenter studies are needed to support our findings.

Liver trauma: What current management?

BACKGROUND

The liver is the most commonly damaged organ in abdominal trauma. The management of liver trauma has experienced many changes over the last two decades. Currently there is a trend toward a non-operative treatment warranted by the successful pediatric experience and better results recorded in many trauma centers worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of operative and non-operative management of liver trauma in our institution over the last five years.

METHODS

The patients with a diagnosis of blunt or penetrating liver injuries, admitted and managed in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2016 were retrospectively studied. The patients were divided into 2 groups, operated and non-operated groups, according to the initial management considered appropriate at the time of patient admission. Clinical features and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study involved 83 patients, with a mean age of 33 years and a marked male predominance (85.5%). The most common type of lesions was blunt trauma and the main cause was road traffic accidents. Sixty-eight liver injuries (81.9%) were of low severity (grades I, II, III), while 15 (18.1%) were of high severity (grade IV or greater). Fifty-six patients (67.5%) had multiple injuries. Surgical treatment was performed in 26 (31.3%) patients. Non-operative management was undertaken in 57 cases (68.7%). The morbidity and mortality rates were clearly lower in non-operative patients compared to those in the operated group.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful non-operative management is an adequate therapeutic strategy for the patients suffering from liver trauma with stable hemodynamics. Patients with complex hepatic trauma and especially those with other organ injuries continue to have significantly higher mortality.

Pretreatment with Fucoidan from Fucus vesiculosus Protected against ConA-Induced Acute Liver Injury by Inhibiting Both Intrinsic and Extrinsic Apoptosis

This study aimed to explore the effects of fucoidan from Fucus vesiculosus on concanavalin A (ConA)-induced acute liver injury in mice. Pretreatment with fucoidan protected liver function indicated by ALT, AST and histopathological changes by suppressing inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interferon gamma (IFN-γ). In addition, intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis mediated by Bax, Bid, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and Caspase 3, 8, and 9 were inhibited by fucoidan and the action was associated with the TRADD/TRAF2 and JAK2/STAT1 signal pathways. Our results demonstrated that fucoidan from Fucus vesiculosus alleviated ConA-induced acute liver injury via the inhibition of intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis mediated by the TRADD/TRAF2 and JAK2/STAT1 pathways which were activated by TNF-α and IFN-γ. These findings could provide a potential powerful therapy for T cell-related hepatitis.

Liver trauma: WSES position paper

The liver is the most injured organ in abdominal trauma. Road traffic crashes and antisocial, violent behavior account for the majority of liver injuries. The present position paper represents the position of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) about the management of liver injuries.