Clinical DRUJ instability does not influence the long-term functional outcome of conservatively treated distal radius fractures

The reliability of clinical assessment of distal radioulnar joint instability among non-United Kingdom European surgeons

Clinical assessment of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability has been shown to be unreliable among experienced hand surgeons in the United Kingdom (UK). The aim of this study was to test the reliability of assessing DRUJ stability in European surgeons outside the UK. Four participants (eight wrists) with four unstable and four stable DRUJs as measured with a proven jig were assessed by 34 surgeons (22 men and 12 women) with a mean age of 43 years (range 29-61). Clinical assessment of DRUJ instability had a sensitivity of 32%, specificity of 88%, a positive predictive value of 72% and a negative predictive value of 56%. Surgeons who had attended a 1-hour workshop on clinical assessment of DRUJ stability the day before the testing were no more reliable at assessing DRUJ instability when compared with those who did not. This further highlights the need for better training with feedback when assessing the DRUJ and the need for objective assessment of DRUJ instability when reported in scientific studies.Level of evidence: V.

Surgical intervention for distal radial fractures with concurrent ulnar styloid fractures may be beneficial for the elderly patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures are highly prevalent among older adults. Ulnar styloid fractures frequently accompany distal radius fractures, raising concerns about treatment outcomes due to the risk of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. This study investigated the necessity of surgical intervention (open reduction internal fixation; ORIF) for distal radius fractures in very old patients with coexisting ulnar styloid fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 96 patients aged ≥ 80 years with AO classification 23-A2 to 23-B3 distal radius fractures with concomitant ulnar styloid fracture between 2019 and 2022 was performed. Patients were excluded if they were aged < 80 years, had a preinjury Barthel index of < 90, or had high-energy multiple trauma. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. We compared the DASH score and their trajectories between the ORIF and conservative treatment groups.

RESULTS

ORIF group demonstrated significantly better DASH functional scores (25.31 ± 4.71) at the 12-month follow-up compared with the conservative group (34.42 ± 8.03; p < 0.001). Treatment choice was identified as a significant predictor of DASH scores at 12 months, with ORIF significantly improved patient's wrist function and demonstrated a β coefficient of - 9.11 (95% confidence interval: -11.95 to - 6.27, p < 0.001). The other factors investigated, namely age, lowest T-score, and medical history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accidents, cancer, and dementia, did not exhibit a significant association with the 12-month DASH scores in the adjusted model (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that very old patients with distal radius fracture accompanied by ulnar styloid fractures may benefit from ORIF to achieve optimal long-term functional recovery.

Concomitant ligament injuries can be left untreated during surgery of distal radial fractures

Instability of the distal radioulnar joint and scapholunate dissociation may cause pain, functional impairment and subsequent arthrosis. There is no consensus about whether these injuries should be treated acutely in patients undergoing surgery for distal radial fractures. We conducted a prospective cohort study to determine whether concomitant distal radioulnar joint instability or scapholunate dissociation negatively influence patient-related outcomes in these patients. The primary outcome was the patient-reported wrist/hand evaluation at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Out of 62 patients, 58% and 27% had intraoperative distal radioulnar joint instability and scapholunate dissociation, respectively. No significant differences were found in patient-reported scores at follow-up between patients with stable and unstable distal radioulnar joints, nor between patients with and without scapholunate dissociation. Sixty-three per cent of patients with an unstable distal radioulnar joint during surgery were stable on retesting after 6 months. Our study suggests that a wait-and-see policy in these patients therefore seems reasonable.Level of evidence: III.

The distal radioulnar joint after distal radial fractures: when and how do we need to treat pain, stiffness or instability?

The importance of distal radioulnar joint problems associated with distal radial fractures is recognized increasingly. But there remains considerable disagreement about how to treat these problems both acutely and chronically. This review outlines the knowledge about the natural history of ulnar-sided wrist problems with distal radials fractures. In particular, the recent increased understanding of the almost inevitable joint instability associated with distal radial fractures is highlighted, including the unreliability of clinical assessment and hence why there has been so much misunderstanding. Provided there is reasonable bony alignment, most ulnar-sided wrist problems can be treated non-operatively initially (typically for over a year) in anticipation of substantial improvement with time. The exception is early marked subluxation of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) blocking forearm rotation, which needs urgent (typically closed) reduction.

Higher-Than-Expected Rates of Distal Radioulnar Joint Fixation in Radial Shaft Fractures: Location of Fracture Matters

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) fixation based on location of the radial shaft fracture and risk factors associated with postoperative complications following radial shaft open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent isolated radial shaft ORIF from 2014 to 2018 were identified from American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and stratified by fracture location and by the presence or absence of DRUJ fixation. Preoperative patient characteristics and postoperative complications were compared to determine risk factors associated with DRUJ fixation.

RESULTS

We identified 1517 patients who underwent isolated radial shaft ORIF, of which 396 (26.1%) underwent DRUJ fixation. Preoperative patient characteristics and postoperative complications were similar between cohorts. Distal radioulnar joint fixation was performed in 50 (30.7%) of 163 distal radial shaft fractures, 191 (21.8%) of 875 midshaft fractures, and 3 (13.0%) of 23 proximal shaft fractures (P = .025). Risk factors for patients readmitted include male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 12.76, P = .009) and older age (OR = 4.99, P = .035). Risk factors for patients with any postoperative complication include dependent functional status (OR = 6.78, P = .02), older age (50-69 vs <50) (OR = 2.73, P = .05), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) ≥3 (OR = 2.45, P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of DRUJ fixation in radial shaft ORIF exceeded previously reported rates of concomitant DRUJ injury, especially among distal radial shaft fractures. More distally located radial shaft fractures are significantly associated with higher rates of DRUJ fixation. Male sex is a risk factor for readmission, whereas dependent functional status, older age, and ASA ≥3 are risk factors for postoperative complications.

Quantitative assessment of the course of distal radioulnar joint instability

Introduction

There is a lack of methods to objectively evaluate improvement in distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability through treatment. We used ultrasonography to assess DRUJ instability and calculated the minimal detectable change (MDC) in healthy individuals. MDC was used to evaluate post-treatment changes in a patient with triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injury.

Methods

DRUJ instability was evaluated using force-monitor ultrasonography in eight healthy male participants to determine MDC and in a man in his 60s who underwent surgery and rehabilitation for TFCC injury (Palmer classification: type 2C). In the patient, DRUJ instability was measured pre-operatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 1 year post-operatively. Self-reported hand and upper limb functional ability were also recorded. The transducer of the force-monitor ultrasonographic system was used to apply cyclic compressions to the wrists automatically and measure DRUJ displacements. The amount of displacement was calculated using the distance between the radius and ulna before and during cyclic compression to the wrists. The applied pressure was measured as the force to the wrist, and the displacement-to-force ratio was calculated.

Results

The 95% confidence MDC95 for radioulnar displacement, displacement force, and displacement-to-force ratio were 0.27-0.31 mm, 0.30-0.59 N, and 0.12-0.15 mm/N, respectively. The patient's post-operative decrease in displacement exceeded the MDC95. DRUJ stability, pain, and use of the affected hand in daily life improved.

Discussion

Force-monitor ultrasonography can quantitatively evaluate post-treatment improvement in DRUJ stability over time. MDC for DRUJ instability can assess recovery after treatment or rehabilitation and determine changes resulting from interventions.

Arthroscopic Foveal Repair of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Improved the Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Persistent Symptomatic Distal Radio-Ulnar Joint Instability After Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To investigate the longitudinal trend of symptomatic distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability after plate fixation for distal radius fractures (DRFs), determine which factors are associated with persistent symptomatic DRUJ instability, and evaluate the postoperative outcomes of arthroscopic foveal repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) in patients with persistent symptomatic DRUJ instability after plate fixation for DRF.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent plate fixation for DRF between January 2014 and December 2017 and were followed up for a minimum of 1 year were included in this retrospective study. DRUJ instability was evaluated by subjective ulnar wrist pain and physical examination that included foveal sign and ballottement testing every 2 months after surgery. In patients with persistent symptomatic DRUJ instability lasting >6 months, arthroscopic transosseous foveal repair was performed with consent. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years after surgery. The Generalized Estimating Equation model was used to analyze the incidence rate trend of symptomatic DRUJ instability.

RESULTS

Overall, 204 patients were included. The incidence of symptomatic DRUJ instability decreased gradually with time after fixation for DRF until 6 months and was maintained thereafter. Thirty-four of 204 patients (16.6%) had persistent symptomatic DRUJ instability. In multivariable analysis, only high-energy injury was an independent risk factor for persistent symptomatic DRUJ instability (P = .003; odds ratio = 3.599). Seventeen patients underwent arthroscopic foveal repair. The mean follow-up period thereafter was 28.6 months. All clinical outcomes improved significantly compared with preoperative values, and no patient had residual DRUJ instability.

CONCLUSION

In patients who had persistent symptomatic DRUJ instability for >6 months after plate fixation for DRFs, arthroscopic foveal repair of the TFCC is considered as a treatment option. Arthroscopic foveal repair of the TFCC to stabilize the DRUJ provided satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes and decreased ulnar-side pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Editorial Commentary: Symptomatic Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability After Distal Radius Fracture Fixation: Improved Outcomes With Arthroscopic Management Are Still Possible After a Trial of Nonoperative Treatment

The literature to guide clinical-decision making for the treatment of symptomatic distal radioulnar joint instability in the setting of distal radius fracture is mixed, with some advocating for surgical treatment at the time of fracture fixation and others reporting acceptable clinical outcomes with conservative management. Given this, it can be challenging to determine which treatment strategy to employ for each individual patient. For injuries that are the result of high-energy trauma or when there is persistent instability lasting 6 months or longer after fracture fixation, surgical intervention may be needed. However, a period of conservative treatment does not appear to result in poorer outcomes.

Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability and Associated Injuries: A Literature Review

The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) allows supination and pronation of the distal forearm and wrist, an integral motion in everyday human activity. DRUJ injury and chronic instability can be a significant source of morbidity in patients' lives. Although often linked with distal radius fractures, DRUJ injury may occur in a variety of other upper extremity injuries, as well as an isolated pathology. Diagnosis of this injury requires the clinician to have a high index of suspicion and low threshold for clinical testing and further imaging of the DRUJ. The purpose of this article is to provide a review on DRUJ anatomy and biomechanics, to discuss common diagnostic and treatment modalities, and to identify common injuries associated with DRUJ instability.

Distal Radius Fracture and the Distal Radioulnar Joint

In this article, we discuss the incidence and types of injuries to the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) that occur in the setting of a distal radius fracture. We review the anatomy of the distal radioulnar joint, which is critical to understanding its biomechanics, and how injury could cause symptomatic incongruency and instability. We highlight how patients with an injury to the distal radioulnar joint might present both at the time of injury and after treatment of a distal radius fracture, the appropriate workup, the available treatment options, and the evidence-based literature.

The evolution of radiological measurements and the association with clinician and patient reported outcome following distal radius fractures in non-osteoporotic patients: what is clinically relevant?

Introduction: Following distal radius fractures in young non-osteoporotic patients, clinical relevancy of outcome has been scarcely reported. Outcome can be put in perspective by using measurement errors of radiological measurements and Minimal Important Change when reporting on clinician and patient reported outcome. Aim of this study was to assess the clinical relevance of radiological measurements, clinician and patient reported outcomes following distal radius fractures in young non-osteoporotic patients.Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Non-osteoporotic patients following a distal radius fracture were selected. Radiographs of both wrists were obtained at baseline, 6 weeks and at follow-up. Active range of motion and grip strength measurements were obtained at the follow-up visit and 4 questionnaires were answered to assess pain, upper extremity functioning, and health status.Results: Seventy-three patients (32 women, 41 men) with a mean age of 33.5 (SD 9.2) years at the time of injury were included. Median follow up was 62 months (IQR 53.0-84.5). Several radiological measurements evolved statistically significantly over time, however none exceeded measurement errors. Flexion/extension difference of injured compared to uninjured wrist (mean difference 11.2°, t = -7.5, df = 72, p < 0.001), exceeded Minimal Important Change, while grip strength differences did not. When comparing patients with DRFs to healthy controls, only the differences on Patient Reported Wrist Evaluation subscales "pain", "function" and total scores exceeded minimal important change (8, 10 and 13 points, respectively). Multivariable regression analysis revealed statistically significant relationships between residual step-off and respectively diminished flexion/extension (B = -36.8, 95% CI -62; -11.1, p  =  0.006), diminished radial/ulnar deviation (B = -17.9, 95% CI -32.0; -3.9, p  =  0.013) and worse ShortForm-36 "mental component score" (B = -15.4, 95% CI -26.6; -4.2, p < 0.001).Conclusion: Radiological measurements following distal radius fractures seem to evolve over time, but differences were small and were probably not clinically relevant. Range of motion, in particular flexion/extension, was impaired to such extend that it was noticeable for a patient, whereas grip strength was not impaired. The Patient Reported Wrist Evaluation was clinically relevantly diminished. Residual articular incongruency seems to influence range of motion.Implications for rehabilitationReporting Minimal Important Change regarding clinician and patient reported outcome following distal radius fractures is of more clinical value than reporting on statistical significance.Following distal radius fractures, the changes in radiological measurements do not seem to reflect a clinical relevant change.Range of motion, in particular flexion/extension, should be measured following distal radius fractures, as this might be impaired in a clinically relevant way.Measuring grip strength is of less importance following distal radius fractures, because grip strength does not seem to be affected.Residual articular incongruency seems to influence range of motion and therefore should be reduced to a minimum when treating non-osteoporotic patients.

The Critical Portions of Carpal Tunnel Release, Ulnar Nerve Transposition, and Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of the Distal Part of the Radius

BACKGROUND

Overlapping surgery is attracting increased scrutiny. The American College of Surgeons states that the attending surgeon must be present for all critical portions of a surgical procedure; however, critical portions of surgical procedures are not defined. We hypothesized that a Delphi panel process would measure consensus on critical portions of 3 common hand surgical procedures.

METHODS

We used a Delphi process to achieve consensus on the critical portions of carpal tunnel release, ulnar nerve transposition, and open reduction and internal fixation of the distal part of the radius. The panelists were 10 hand surgeons (7 fellowship-trained surgeons and 3 fellows). Following an in-person discussion to finalize steps for each procedure, 2 online rounds were completed to rate steps from 1 (not critical) to 9 (extremely critical). We operationalized consensus as ≥80% of ratings within the same range: 1 to 3 (not critical), 4 to 6 (somewhat critical), and 7 to 9 (critical). Because of a lack of consensus on some steps after round 2, another in-person discussion and a third online round were conducted to rate only steps involving disagreement or somewhat critical ratings using a dichotomous scale (critical or not critical).

RESULTS

Following the first 2 rounds, there was consensus on 19 of 24 steps (including 3 steps being somewhat critical) and no consensus on 5 of 24 steps. At the end of round 3, there was consensus on all but 2 steps (identification of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve in ulnar nerve transposition and clinical assessment of joint stability in open reduction and internal fixation of the distal part of the radius), with moderate disagreement (3 compared with 7) for both.

CONCLUSIONS

The panel reached consensus on the designation of critical or noncritical for all steps of a carpal tunnel release, all but 1 step of an ulnar nerve transposition, and all but 1 step of open reduction and internal fixation of the distal part of the radius. The lack of consensus on whether 2 of the steps are critical leaves this determination at the discretion of the attending surgeon. The findings of our Delphi panel provide guidance to our division on which portions of the surgical procedure are critical and thus require the attending surgeon's presence.

The value of computed tomography in detecting distal radioulnar joint instability after a distal radius fracture

This study evaluated the value of computed tomography scans for the diagnosis of distal radioulnar joint instability. A total of 46 patients, conservatively treated for a unilateral distal radius fracture, were evaluated. Clinical instability was tested using the stress test and clunk test. A computed tomography scan of both wrists was performed in pronation and supination. Two independent observers reviewed the computed tomography scans using: the radioulnar line, subluxation ratio, epicentre and radioulnar ratio methods. Radiological distal radioulnar joint instability was assessed by comparing the measurements of the injured wrist with those of the contralateral uninjured wrists. A total of 22 patients had clinical instability of whom 12 suffered from pain in the injured wrist. Distal radioulnar joint instability was diagnosed on computed tomography in 29 patients. Reliability analysis between clinical and radiological evaluations showed at best moderate, but generally poor agreement. The diagnostic ability of computed tomography for identifying distal radioulnar joint instability seems limited.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.