Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in severely injured patients: an international comparative assessment

Efficacy of the bleeding risk scoring system for optimal prophylactic anticoagulation therapy of venous thromboembolism in trauma patients: a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

We developed a bleeding risk scoring system (BRSS) using prophylactic anticoagulation therapy to comprehensively assess the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in trauma patients. This study evaluated the usefulness of this system in trauma patients, with a focus on minimizing the rate of bleeding events associated with prophylactic anticoagulation therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of BRSS in trauma patients who received prophylactic anticoagulation therapy for VTE at the Kitasato University Hospital Emergency and Critical Care Center between April 1, 2015, and August 31, 2020. To compare the incidence of bleeding events, patients were divided into two groups: one group using the BRSS (BRSS group) and another group not using the BRSS (non-BRSS group).

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients were enrolled in this study, with 70 and 24 patients assigned to the non-BRSS and BRSS groups, respectively. The major bleeding event rates were not significantly different between the two groups (BRSS group, 4.2%; non-BRSS group, 5.7%; p = 1.000). However, minor bleeding events were significantly reduced in the BRSS group (4.2% vs.27.1%; p = 0.020). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that BRSS was not an independent influencing factor of major bleeding events (odds ratio, 0.660; 95% confidence interval: 0.067-6.47; p = 0.721). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that BRSS was an independent influencing factor of minor bleeding events (odds ratio, 0.119; 95% confidence interval: 0.015-0.97; p = 0.047). The incidence of VTE did not differ significantly between groups (BRSS group, 4.2%; non-BRSS group, 8.6%; p = 0.674).

CONCLUSIONS

BRSS may be a useful tool for reducing the incidence of minor bleeding events during the initial prophylactic anticoagulation therapy in trauma patients. There are several limitations of this study that need to be addressed in future research.

Risk assessment scales to predict risk of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis among multiple trauma patients: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication in orthopedic patients. Previous studies have focused on major orthopedic surgery.There are few studies with multiple trauma. We aimed to describe the prevalence of DVT and compare the predictive power of the different risk assessment scales in patients with multiple trauma.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study involved multiple trauma patients admitted to our hospital between October 2021 and December 2022. Data were prospectively collected for thrombotic risk assessments using the Risk Assessment Profile for thromboembolism(RAPT), the DVT risk assessment score (DRAS), and the Trauma Embolic Scoring System (TESS), respectively. The receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were evaluated to compare the predictive power. The whole leg duplex ultrasound of both lower extremities Doppler ultrasound was used to determine DVT incidence.

RESULTS

A total of 210 patients were included, and the incidence of DVT was 26.19%. Distal DVT accounted for 87.27%; postoperative DVT, 72.73%; and bilateral lower extremity thrombosis, 30.91%. There were significant differences in age, education degree, pelvic fracture, surgery, ISS, D-dimer level, length of hospital stay and ICU stay between the thrombosis group and the non-thrombosis group. The AUCs for RAPT, DRAS, and TESS were 0.737, 0.710, and 0.683, respectively. There were no significant differences between the three ROC curves.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of DVT was relatively high during hospitalization. We prospectively validated the tests to predict risk of DVT among patients with multiple trauma to help trauma surgeons in the clinical administration of DVT prophylaxis.

Prevalence and factors related with venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to the critical care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Venous thromboembolism is one of the most common cardiovascular disorders in the any intensive care units (ICUs), which annually leads to death and imposes great costs on patients and society worldwide. The present study was conducted with the aim of determining the prevalence and factors related to venous thromboembolism in the ICUs as a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The current study was conducted in international databases, on all descriptive and analytical studies and clinical and semi-experimental trial studies, without time limit until November 2, 2021. The present study was designed and implemented based on PRISMA guideline. The quality of the studies was checked using STROBE checklist and meta-analysis was performed using CMA software.

RESULTS

Among the 3204 articles found, after the evaluations, 189 articles entered the full text review phase, and as a result, 38 articles were included in the study. The reported prevalence of thromboembolism was 1-45%. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism was 12% in overall. The chance of venous thromboembolism was higher in ICUs patients >57 years old and ICUs patients with a history of venous thromboembolism.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that venous thromboembolism has a higher prevalence in ICUs patients in comparison to non-ICUs patients. It is recommended to nurses and healthcare staffs to provide accurate decision and care for prevention of venous thromboembolism and paying attention to the patient's warning signs, timely administration of anticoagulants, and monitor coagulation factors.

Addition of aspirin to venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis safely decreases venous thromboembolism rates in trauma patients

Background

Trauma patients exhibit a multifactorial hypercoagulable state and have increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite early and aggressive chemoprophylaxis (CP) with various heparin compounds ("standard" CP; sCP), VTE rates remain high. In high-quality studies, aspirin has been shown to decrease VTE in postoperative elective surgical and orthopedic trauma patients. We hypothesized that inhibiting platelet function with aspirin as an adjunct to sCP would reduce the risk of VTE in trauma patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data from all adult patients admitted to an American College of Surgeons Level I Trauma center from January 2012 to June 2015 to evaluate the addition of aspirin (sCP+A) to sCP regimens for VTE mitigation. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the potential benefit of adjunctive aspirin for symptomatic VTE incidence.

Results

10,532 patients, median age 44 (IQR 28 to 62), 68% male, 89% blunt mechanism of injury, with a median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 12 (IQR 9 to 19), were included in the study. 8646 (82%) of patients received only sCP, whereas 1886 (18%) patients received sCP+A. The sCP+A cohort displayed a higher median ISS compared with sCP (13 vs 11; p<0.01). The overall median time of sCP initiation was hospital day 1 (IQR 0.8 to 2) and the median day for aspirin initiation was hospital day 3 (IQR 1 to 6) for the sCP+A cohort. 353 patients (3.4%) developed symptomatic VTE. Aspirin administration was independently associated with a decreased relative hazard of VTE (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.88; p=0.01). There were no increased bleeding or wound complications associated with sCP+A (point estimate 1.23, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.2, p=0.50).

Conclusion

In this large trauma cohort, adjunctive aspirin was independently associated with a significant reduction in VTE and may represent a potential strategy to safely mitigate VTE risk in trauma patients. Further prospective studies evaluating the addition of aspirin to heparinoid-based VTE chemoprophylaxis regimens should be sought.

Level of evidence

Level III/therapeutic.

Timing of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis with major surgery of lower-extremity long bone fractures

BACKGROUND

There is debate on the need to withhold chemical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients requiring major orthopedic surgery. We hypothesized that the incidence of clinically significant hemorrhage (CSH) does not differ by the timing of prophylaxis in such patients.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study conducted at five US trauma centers that included trauma patients admitted between January 1, 2018, to March 1, 2020, requiring surgical fixation of the femoral shaft, hip, or tibia and received VTE chemoprophylaxis during the hospitalization. Exclusions were major and moderate head or spinal injuries, chronic anticoagulant use, or multiple long bone surgeries. Timing of VTE chemoprophylaxis was examined as four groups: (1) initiated preoperatively without interruption for surgery; (2) initiated preoperatively but held perioperatively; (3) initiated within 12 hours postoperatively; and (4) initiated >12 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome was incidence of CSH (%), defined as overt hemorrhage within 24 hours postoperative that was actionable. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated differences in CSH based on timing of VTE chemoprophylaxis.

RESULTS

There were 786 patients, and 65 (8.3%) developed a CSH within 24 hours postoperatively. Nineteen percent of patients received chemoprophylaxis preoperatively without interruption for surgery, 13% had preoperative initiation but dose(s) were held for surgery, 21% initiated within 12 hours postoperatively, and 47% initiated more than 12 hours postoperatively. The incidence and adjusted odds of CSH were similar across groups (11.3%, 9.1%, 7.1%, and 7.3% respectively; overall p = 0.60). The incidence of VTE was 0.9% and similar across groups ( p = 0.47); however, six of seven VTEs occurred when chemoprophylaxis was delayed or interrupted.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that early and uninterrupted VTE chemoprophylaxis is safe and effective in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery for long bone fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Timing of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis using objective hemoglobin criteria in blunt solid organ injury

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of early venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis following blunt solid organ injury.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients was performed for patients with blunt solid organ injury between 2009-2019. Enoxaparin was initiated when patients had <1g/dl Hemoglobin decline over a 24 h period. These patients were then categorized by initiation: ≤48 h and >48 h.

RESULTS

There were 653 patients: 328 (50.2%) <48 h and 325 (49.8%) ≥48 h. Twenty-nine (4.4%) developed VTE. Patients in ≥48 h group suffered more frequent VTE events (6.5% vs 2.4%, p = 0.021). Non-operative failure occurred in 6 patients (1.9%) in ≥48 h group, and 5 patients (1.5%) < 48 h group. Blood transfusion following chemophrophylaxis initiation was required in 69 (21.3%) in ≥48 h group, and 46 (14.0%) in < 48 h group, occurring similarly between groups (p=0.021).

CONCLUSION

Stable hemoglobin in the first 24 h is an efficacious, objective measure that allows early initiation of VTE chemoprophylaxis in solid organ injury. This practice is associated with earlier initiation of and fewer VTE events.

Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Statement for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in the Critical Care Unit

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a preventable complication of critical illness, and this guideline aims to convey a pragmatic approach to the problem. Guidelines have multiplied over the last decade, and their utility has become increasingly conflicted as the reader interprets all suggestions or recommendations as something that must be followed. The nuances of grade of recommendation vs level of evidence are often ignored, and the difference between a "we suggest" vs a "we recommend" is overlooked. There is a general unease among clinicians that failure to follow the guidelines translates to poor medical practice and legal culpability. We attempt to overcome these limitations by highlighting ambiguity when it occurs and refraining from dogmatic recommendations in the absence of robust evidence. Readers and practitioners may find the lack of specific recommendations unsatisfactory, but we believe that true ambiguity is better than inaccurate certainty. We have attempted to comply with the guidelines on how to create guidelines.1 And to overcome the poor compliance with these guidelines.2 Some observers have expressed concern that DVT prophylaxis guidelines may cause more harm than good.3 We have placed greater emphasis on large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with clinical end point and de-emphasized RCTs with surrogate end points and also de-emphasized hypothesis generating studies (observational studies, small RCTs, and meta-analysis of these studies). We have de-emphasized RCTs in non-intensive care unit populations like postoperative patients or those with cancer and stroke. We have also considered resource limitation settings and have avoided recommending costly and poorly proven therapeutic options.

How to cite this article

Jagiasi BG, Chhallani AA, Dixit SB, Kumar R, Pandit RA, Govil D, et al. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Statement for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in the Critical Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(S2):S51-S65.

Prognostic Significance of Plasma Insulin Level for Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Critical Care

BACKGROUND

Whether insulin resistance underlies deep venous thrombosis (DVT) development in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unclear. In this study, the association between plasma insulin levels and DVT was analyzed in patients with severe TBI.

METHODS

A prospective observational study of 73 patients measured insulin, glucose, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), inflammatory factors, and hematological profiles within four preset times during the first 14 days after TBI. Ultrasonic surveillance of DVT was tracked. Two-way analysis of variance was used to determine the factors that discriminated between patients with and without DVT or with and without insulin therapy. Partial correlations of insulin level with all the variables were conducted separately in patients with DVT or patients without DVT. Factors associated with DVT were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression. Neurological outcomes 6 months after TBI were assessed.

RESULTS

Among patients with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 53 (± 16 years), DVT developed in 20 patients (27%) on median 10.4 days (range 4-22), with higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores but similar Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and TBI severity. Patients with DVT were more likely to receive insulin therapy than patients without DVT (60% vs. 28%; P = 0.012); hence, they had higher 14-day insulin levels. However, insulin levels were comparable between patients with DVT and patients without DVT in the subgroups of patients with insulin therapy (n = 27) and patients without insulin therapy (n = 46). The platelet profile significantly discriminated between patients with and without DVT. Surprisingly, none of the coagulation profiles, blood cell counts, or inflammatory mediators differed between the two groups. Patients with insulin therapy had significantly higher insulin (P = 0.006), glucose (P < 0.001), and GLP-1 (P = 0.01) levels and were more likely to develop DVT (60% vs. 15%; P < 0.001) along with concomitant platelet depletion. Insulin levels correlated with glucose, GLP-1 levels, and platelet count exclusively in patients without DVT. Conversely, in patients with DVT, insulin correlated negatively with GLP-1 levels (P = 0.016). Age (P = 0.01) and elevated insulin levels at days 4-7 (P = 0.04) were independently associated with DVT. Patients with insulin therapy also showed worse Glasgow Outcome Scale scores (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated insulin levels in the first 14 days after TBI may indicate insulin resistance, which is associated with platelet hyperactivity, and thus increasing the risk of DVT.

Current Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of morbidity, disability and mortality across all age groups globally. Currently, only palliative treatments exist, but these are suboptimal and do little to combat the progressive damage to the brain that occurs after a TBI. However, multiple experimental treatments are currently available that target the primary and secondary biochemical and cellular changes that occur after a TBI. Some of these drugs have progressed to clinical trials and are currently being evaluated for their therapeutic benefits in TBI patients. The aim of this study was to identify which drugs are currently being evaluated in clinical trials for TBI. A search of ClinicalTrials.gov was performed on 3 December 2021 and all clinical trials that mentioned “TBI” OR “traumatic brain injury” AND “drug” were searched, revealing 362 registered trials. Of the trials, 46 were excluded due to the drug not being mentioned, leaving 138 that were completed and 116 that were withdrawn. Although the studies included 267,298 TBI patients, the average number of patients per study was 865 with a range of 5–200,000. Of the completed studies, 125 different drugs were tested in TBI patients but only 7 drugs were used in more than three studies, including amantadine, botulinum toxin A and tranexamic acid (TXA). However, previous clinical studies using these seven drugs showed variable results. The current study concludes that clinical trials in TBI have to be carefully conducted so as to reduce variability across studies, since the severity of TBI and timing of therapeutic interventions were key aspects of trial success.

Trauma-induced pulmonary thromboembolism: What's update?

Trauma-induced pulmonary thromboembolism is the second leading cause of death in severe trauma patients. Primary fibrinolytic hyperactivity combined with hemorrhage and consequential hypercoagulability in severe trauma patients create a huge challenge for clinicians. It is crucial to ensure a safe anticoagulant therapy for trauma patients, but a series of clinical issues need to be answered first, for example, what are the risk factors for traumatic venous thromboembolism? How to assess and determine the status of coagulation dysfunction of patients? When is the optimal timing to initiate pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism? What types of prophylactic agents should be used? How to manage the anticoagulation-related hemorrhage and to determine the optimal timing of restarting chemoprophylaxis? The present review attempts to answer the above questions.

Damage Control Orthopaedics in Spinal Trauma

There has been a shift in the management of the polytrauma patients from early total care to damage control orthopaedics (DCO), whereby patients with borderline hemodynamic stability may be temporized with the use of external fixators, traction, or splinting with delayed osteosynthesis of fractures. Recently, there has been an increasing trend toward a middle ground approach of Early Appropriate Care for polytrauma patients. The concepts of DCO for the spine are less clear, and the management of trauma patients with combined pelvic ring and spinal fractures or patients with noncontiguous spinal injuries present unique challenges to the surgeon in prioritization of patient needs. This review outlines the concept of DCO and Early Appropriate Care in the spine, prioritizing patient needs from the emergency department to the operating room. Concepts include the timing of surgery, minimally invasive versus open techniques, and the prioritization of spinal injuries in the setting of other orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic injuries. Contiguous and noncontiguous spinal injuries are considered in construct planning, and the principles are discussed.

Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis in Trauma and Emergency General Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Appropriate venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis in trauma and emergency general surgery (EGS) patients is crucial.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to review the recent literature and offer recommendations for VTE chemoprophylaxis in trauma and EGS patients.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search from 2000 to 2021 for articles investigating VTE chemoprophylaxis in adult trauma and EGS patients. This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Our search resulted in 34 articles. Most studies showed low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is similar to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for VTE prevention; however, LMWH was more commonly used. Adjusted chemoprophylaxis dosing did not change the VTE rate but the timing did. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been shown to be safe and effective in trauma and traumatic brain injury (TBI)/spinal cord injury (SCI). Studies showed VTE prophylaxis in EGS can be inconsistent and improves with guidelines that lower VTE events.

CONCLUSIONS

There may be no benefit to receiving LMWH over UFH in trauma patients. In addition, different drugs under the class of LMWH do not change the incidence of VTE. Adjusted dosing of enoxaparin does not seem to affect VTE incidence. The use of DOACs in the trauma TBI and SCI setting has been shown to be safe and effective in reducing VTE. One important consideration with VTE prophylaxis may be the timing of prophylaxis initiation, specifically as it relates to TBI, with a higher likelihood of developing VTE as time progresses. EGS patients are at a high risk of VTE. Improved compliance with clinical guidelines in this population is correlated with decreased thrombotic events.

Acquired antithrombin deficiency is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism after major trauma

BACKGROUND

Up to 30% of severely injured patients on prophylactic anticoagulation experience venous thromboembolism (VTE). Our previous work shows that acquired antithrombin (AT) deficiency [AT<80%] occurs in approximately 20% of trauma patients upon admission and drives poor responsiveness to enoxaparin. However, changes in AT over time and its association with VTE remain unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between acquired AT deficiency and VTE in severely injured patients.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of the Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) clinical trial was performed. Patients who died within 24 h of hemorrhage were excluded from analysis. Demographics, mechanism and severity of injury, transfusions volumes, and outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not develop VTE. Non-parametric statistical tests were used to compare patients with and without VTE. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of VTE risk, controlling for AT deficiency (over first 72 h), age, gender, race, body mass index, study site, randomization group and injury severity. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the contribution of AT deficiency to the risk of VTE, while censoring for early deaths.

RESULTS

Of the 680 patients enrolled in PROPPR, 101 died of hemorrhage. Of the remaining 579 patients, 86 (14.9%) developed VTE. The median time to VTE was 6 days (IQR 3, 13). No differences in demographics, injuries, or transfusion volumes were identified between VTE cases and controls. AT deficiency at 72 h post-admission was independently associated with VTE. Patients who experienced AT deficiency at 72 h had a 3.3 fold increased risk of VTE [p < 0.01; 95% CI 1.56, 6.98]. Lastly, patients who developed VTE had worse outcomes as displayed by significantly fewer hospital-free days compared to non-VTE patients [0 (0, 8) vs. 4 (0, 18), p < 0.01, respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

Acquired AT deficiency (AT<80%) is an important risk factor for VTE in severely injured patients. These data indicate that intervening, perhaps through AT supplementation, in the first three days after injury could mitigate the risk of VTE and improve patient outcomes.

Prophylactic placement of inferior vena cava filters and the risk of death or venous thromboembolism in severe trauma patients: a retrospective study comparing two hospitals with different approaches

Background

Prophylactic use of inferior vena cava filters to prevent pulmonary embolism in trauma is controversial. The practice varies between hospitals and countries, in part due to conflicting evidence and guidelines.

Purpose

To compare the effects of pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis and mortality in two hospitals using prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement or prophylactic anticoagulation alone.

Material and Methods

Patients presenting with severe trauma were recruited from two level-1 trauma centres between January 2008 and December 2013. Recruited patients from an US hospital having prophylactic inferior vena cava filter inserted were compared to a Scandinavian hospital using prophylactic anticoagulation alone. Inclusion criteria were age >15 years, Injury Severity Score >15 and survival >24 h after hospital admission. Patients with venous thromboembolism diagnosed prior to inferior vena cava filter placement were excluded. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used with adjustment for immortal time bias and predictor variables.

Results

In total, 951 patients were reviewed, 282 from an US hospital having inferior vena cava filters placed and 669 from a Scandinavian hospital without inferior vena cava filters. The mean age was 45.9 vs. 47.4 years and the mean Injury Severity Score was 29.8 vs. 25.9, respectively. Inferior vena cava filter placement was not associated with the hazard of pulmonary embolism (Hazard ratio=0.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12, 1.45; P=0.17) or mortality (Hazard ratio=1.16; 95% CI 0.70, 1.95; P=0.56). However, an increased rate of deep venous thrombosis was observed with inferior vena cava filters in place (Hazard ratio=3.75; 95% CI 1.68, 8.36; P=0.001).

Conclusion

In severely injured trauma patients, prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement was not associated with pulmonary embolism or mortality. However, inferior vena cava filters were associated with increased rate of deep venous thrombosis.