Retrograde tibial nailing of far distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical evaluation of double- versus triple-distal interlocking

Comparison of retrograde and antegrade tibial intramedullary nail in the treatment of extra-articular distal tibial fractures

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of retrograde and antegrade intramedullary tibial nails (RTN and ATN) in managing extra-articular distal tibial fractures, addressing current controversies in surgical approaches.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis included 56 patients treated between December 2019 and August 2022 with either RTN (n = 23) or ATN (n = 33). Data on baseline characteristics, operative specifics, fluoroscopy usage, hospitalization duration, fracture healing times, time to full weight-bearing, distal tibial alignment, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores at final follow-up, and complications were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were generally comparable and no significant differences except for fracture line lengths (RTN: 6.1 ± 1.9 cm vs. ATN: 7.8 ± 1.6 cm) were observed. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 20 months. No significant differences were observed in operative duration, hospital stays, coronal angulation of the distal tibial joint surface, or AOFAS scores at final follow-up. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was more frequent in the ATN group (9.5 ± 1.5) compared to RTN (8.3 ± 1.1) (P = 0.001). RTN showed shorter healing times (9.6 ± 1.2 weeks) and quicker return to full weight-bearing (12.9 ± 1.3 weeks) than ATN (10.6 ± 1.2 weeks and 13.9 ± 1.7 weeks, respectively). RTN complications included one delayed union, one superficial infection, and two ankle pain, while ATN complications comprised one delayed union, one superficial infection, seven anterior knee pain, and one malalignment. Despite higher complication rates with ATN, the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of extra-articular distal tibial fractures, both RTN and ATN are effective approaches. RTN may offer benefits such as reduced fluoroscopy use, accelerated healing, and earlier return to full weight-bearing compared to ATN.

Nonunion of the distal one-fourth of the tibia treated by retrograde tibial intramedullary nail

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of retrograde tibial intramedullary nail (RTN) in addressing nonunion in the distal one-fourth of the tibia.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive patients who were treated with RTN for nonunion in the distal one-fourth of the tibia between December 2020 and August 2023. Data regarding age, sex, injury mechanism, fracture type, initial fixation method, nonunion duration and type, risk factors, surgical duration, hospital stay, time to bone union, ankle function at final follow-up, and any complications were extracted from hospital records and analysed.

RESULTS

Five patients in total were included, with previous treatments comprising locking plates and/or external fixation. The mean duration of RTN surgery was 94.0 ± 13.7 min, and mean duration of hospital stay was 9.8 ± 1.9 days. Patients were monitored for 10-18 months post RTN, achieving complete bone healing within a mean of 4.8 months. At the latest follow-up, the mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 84.4 ± 6.8 (range, 77-95). No complications, such as infection, reoperation, implant issues, rotational deformity, or shortening were reported.

CONCLUSION

RTN emerges as a dependable, minimally invasive, and safe treatment modality for managing nonunion in the distal one-fourth of the tibia.

Distal tibial fractures fixation using retrograde tibial intramedullary nail in high-risk patients: a retrospective study

Distal tibial fractures are common lower-limb injuries and are generally associated with a high risk of postoperative complications, especially in patients with multiple medical comorbidities. This study sought to ascertain the efficacy of retrograde intramedullary tibial nails (RTN) for treating extra-articular distal tibial fractures in high-risk patients. Between January 2019 and December 2021, 13 patients considered at high risk for postoperative complications underwent RTN fixation. Comorbidities in the patient sample included diabetes, renal disease, hypertension, severe osteoporosis, hemorrhagic blisters, long-term smoking, alcoholism and so on. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to assess treatment data, wound complications, infections, hardware failure, time to bone union, and functional outcomes. The mean preoperative waiting time and operation duration was 7.1 ± 1.7 days and 61.1 ± 7.1 minutes, respectively. The hospital stay time ranged from 10 to 16 days, with a mean of 12.6 ± 1.9 days. All patients were monitored for a mean follow-up time of 17.5 ± 3.3 months. All patients achieved fracture union with an average healing time of 5.0 ± 0.7 months. No implant failure or persistent pain was observed in the surgical site. Two patients had superficial infection, but no further complications resulted from the incision. At the final follow-up, the average AOFAS score was 84.0 ± 7.3 points, with an excellent and good rate of 76.9%. RTN appears to be a reliable treatment option for extra-articular distal tibial fractures in high-risk patients.

Retrograde tibial intramedullary nail versus minimally invasive locking plate for extra-articular distal tibial fractures: a comparative and retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Distal tibial fractures represent common lower limb injuries, frequently accompanied by significant soft tissue damage. The optimal surgical approach for managing these fractures remains a topic of considerable debate. The aim of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of the outcomes associated with retrograde intramedullary tibial nails (RTN) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the context of treating extra-articular distal tibial fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on a cohort of 48 patients who sustained extra-articular distal tibial fractures between December 2019 and December 2021. Patients underwent either RTN or MIPO procedures. Various parameters, including operative duration, intraoperative fluoroscopy exposure, time to union, duration until full weight-bearing, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and complications, were recorded and compared between the two treatment groups.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were observed in operative duration, time to union, angulation of the distal tibial coronal plane, or AOFAS scores between the RTN and MIPO groups. However, the RTN group had a higher average number of intraoperative fluoroscopy images (8.2 ± 2.3) compared to the MIPO group (4.1 ± 2.0). The RTN group demonstrated shorter average hospital stays (7.1 ± 1.4 days) and a quicker return to full weight-bearing (9.9 ± 1.3 weeks), which were significantly superior to the MIPO group (9.0 ± 2.0 days and 11.5 ± 1.5 weeks, respectively). In terms of complications, the RTN group had one case of superficial infection, whereas the MIPO group exhibited two cases of delayed union and nonunion, two occurrences of deep infection, and an additional three cases of superficial infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Both RTN and MIPO are effective treatment options for extra-articular distal tibial fractures. However, RTN may offer superior outcomes in terms of decreased inpatient needs, faster return to full weight-bearing capacity, and a lower rate of complications.

Preliminary results of stabilization of far distal tibia fractures with the distal tibial nail: A prospective, multicenter case series study

INTRODUCTION

The distal tibial nail (DTN) is a novel retrograde intramedullary nail used for distal tibial fracture stabilization. We investigated the clinical results of DTN use for distal tibial fractures and compared them with those reported in the literature on locking plates and antegrade intramedullary nails.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study examined distal tibial fractures with AO/OTA classification 43 types: A1, A2, A3 or C1. The primary outcomes included bone union rate, soft tissue problems, and surgical complications. Secondary outcomes were EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q), and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot clinical scores 1 year postoperatively. Incidence of varus or valgus/anterior-posterior flexion deformity with a difference of ≥5° and postoperative reduction loss rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

Five men and five women were enrolled (mean age, 69 years [range, 30-77 years]), including one open-fracture-type Gustilo type IIIB case. Bone union was observed in all patients at 6 months postoperatively. Delayed union, leg edema, and guide pin breakage were observed in three, one, and one cases, respectively. No soft tissue or surgical complications were observed. During the final follow-up, the EQ-5D-5L, SAFE-Q, and AOFAS hindfoot scores were 0.876 (0.665-1.0), 83-92, and AOFAS 92.6 (76-100), respectively. Varus and retroflexion deformities were observed in one case each.

DISCUSSION

DTN has been reported to have biomechanically equivalent or stronger fixation strength than locking plates or antegrade intramedullary nails. In addition, while DTN was thought to be less invasive for soft tissue and can avoid injury to the knee, it was thought that care should be taken to avoid medial malleolus fractures and posterior tibialis tendon injuries. Comparisons with literature treatment results for locking plates and antegrade intramedullary nails showed comparable to advantageous results.

CONCLUSIONS

DTN treatment results for distal tibial fractures were as good as those for locking plates and antegrade intramedullary nails. DTN is useful for stabilization and does not compromise the surrounding soft tissues.

Intramedullary nailing at different distal tibial fracture levels: A biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Distal tibial fractures remains a significant challenge in orthopedic trauma surgery. As the fracture level approaches the joint, alternative fixation options instead of intramedullary nailing (IMN) come to the fore. The present study aimed to assess the biomechanical stability of IMN at different distal tibial fracture levels and the number of locking screws required.

METHODS

Using a total of 21 sawbone models, 3 different tibial fracture levels (3, 4.5, and 6 cm proximally to the talocrural joint) were created and the fractures were fixed using 2, 3, or 4 distal locking screws. A single compression force at a speed of 30 mm/min with a maximum force of 800 Newton and a cyclic compression force of 60 cycles at a speed of 60 mm/min was applied to all tibia models. The applied weight and displacements from the fracture lines were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in fixation with 2 distal locking screws in groups 1, 2, and 3 (single test P =.9689) (cyclic test P =.8050). Therefore, if 2 distal screws are used, the fracture level does not affect the strength of fixation. In fractures located 6 cm proximal to the talocrural joint, all 4 holes of the nail can be used to insert screws, which provides a stronger fixation. When 2 screws are used, a statistically weaker fixation is obtained than with 3 or 4 screws. However, there is no significant difference between using 3 or 4 screws.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the use of IMN with 2 distal locking screws as a viable option for the management of distal tibial fractures. We found that it provides sufficient fixation regardless of the fracture level, suggesting that there is no need to choose an alternative fixation technique due to concerns of inadequate fixation as the fracture line moves distally. In cases where more stable fixation is desired, an additional locking screw can be used, but the potential increase in procedure and fluoroscopy time should be considered.

Comparative experimental study of the biomechanical properties of retrograde tibial nailing and distal tibia plate in distal tibia fracture

Objective: A biomechanical comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the retrograde tibial nailing (RTN) and distal tibia plate techniques for the treatment of distal tibia fractures. Methods: Fourteen fresh adult tibia specimens were selected, consisting of seven males and seven females aged 34-55 years. The specimens were randomly divided into two groups (Group A and Group B) using a numerical table method, with seven specimens in each group. Group A underwent internal fixation of distal tibial fractures using RTN, while Group B received internal fixation using a plate. The axial compression properties of the specimens were tested in the neutral positions under pressures of 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 N. Additionally, the torsional resistance of the two groups was assessed by subjecting the specimens to torques of 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 N m. Results: At pressures of 400 and 500 N, the axial compression displacement in Group A (1.11 ± 0.06, 1.24 ± 0.05) mm was significantly smaller than that in Group B (1.21 ± 0.08, 1.37 ± 0.11) mm (p = 0.023, 0.019). Moreover, at a pressure of 500 N, the axial compression stiffness in Group A (389.24 ± 17.79) N/mm was significantly higher than that of the control group (362.37 ± 14.44) N/mm (p = 0.010). When subjected to torques of 4 and 5 N m, the torsion angle in Group A (2.97° ± 0.23°, 3.41° ± 0.17°) was significantly smaller compared to Group B (3.31° ± 0.28°, 3.76° ± 0.20°) (p = 0.035, 0.004). Furthermore, at a torque of 5 N m, the torsional stiffness in Group A (1.48 ± 0.07) N m/° was significantly higher than that in Group B (1.36 ± 0.06) N·m/° (p = 0.003). Conclusion: The results obtained from the study demonstrate that the biomechanical performance of RTN outperforms that of the distal tibial plate, providing valuable biomechanical data to support the clinical implementation of RTN.

The grade of instability in fragility fractures of the pelvis correlates with impaired early mobilization

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate whether gait patterns of patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) comply with the grade of fracture instability, defined by radiological patterns.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, single-center, observational study included 39 patients with an FFP. Gait analysis was performed with a wearable insole force sensor (Loadsol® by Novel, Munich, Germany) 4-7 days after admission. Patients were divided in two groups: Group A included FFP type 1 fractures, which affect the anterior pelvic ring only, Group B contained FFP type 2-4 fractures with an involvement of the posterior pelvic ring. Primary outcome parameter was the FTI ratio (force-time integral (N*s)).

RESULTS

The mean age was 85.08 years (SD ± 6.45), 94.9% (37/39) of the patients were female. The most common fracture type was an FFP 2b (64.1%, 25/39). Group A showed a significantly higher FTI ratio (45.12%, SD ± 4.19%) than Group B (38.45%, SD ± 5.97%, p = 0.002). Further, a significant correlation of the FTI ratio and the average (r = 0.570, p < 0.001) and maximum (r = 0.394, p = 0.013) peak force was observed.

CONCLUSION

The gait pattern of patients with an FFP type 2-4 was more imbalanced than of patients with an FFP type 1 fracture. These findings match with the radiological classification of FFP, which indicates higher instability, when the posterior pelvis is affected. Gait analysis might offer earlier functional diagnostics and may accelerate the treatment decision with shorter periods of immobility in future. Especially in cross-border cases, early gait analysis could be beneficial to clarify the indication for or against surgery.

Prospective assessment of key factors influencing treatment strategy and outcome of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP)

BACKGROUND

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are a clinical entity with an increasing significance in clinical practice. Little is known about the conditions, which influence decision making and outcome.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective assessment of selected parameters of patients, who were admitted with a FFP in a 2-year period. Fractures were classified in accordance with the Rommens and Hofmann classification. Living environment, level of autonomy (independent walking), type of treatment (conservative versus operative), type of surgical technique, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L), Short Form-8 Physical Component Score (SF-8 PCS) and Short Form-8 Mental Component Score (SF-8 MCS), Barthel Index, Parker Mobility Score (PMS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were collected at primary presentation (t1), at discharge (t2) and after 3 (t3) and 12 months (t4). Length of hospital stay, in-hospital complications, surgery-related complications, new osteoporotic fractures and mortality rate within the first year were also registered. The key factors influencing the choice of therapy and outcome were looked for.

RESULTS

110 patients, 99 women (90%) and 11 men (10%), were included in the study. Their mean age was 79.2 years (SD 10 years). Fourteen patients had FFP type I (12.7%), 59 FFP type II (53.6%), 11 FFP type III (10%) and 26 FFP type IV fractures (23.6%). All patients with FFP type I were treated conservatively. 48 patients with FFP types II-IV were treated conservatively and 48 operatively. Patients, who got a conservative outpatient treatment first and were hospitalized later, had higher FFP fracture types at admission. Operatively treated patients were hospitalized at a median of 33.5 days after the beginning of complaints, whereas the median day of admission of the conservative group was the day of trauma (p < 0.001). The operatively treated patients were hospitalized in a worse clinical condition (SF-8 PCS, EQ-5D-5L, autonomy). Length of stay (LoS) of operatively treated patients was significantly longer than of conservatively treated (p < 0.001). There was a tendency to more in-hospital complications in the operative group (p = 0.059). The rate of surgery-related complications (8.3%) was low with only one revision needed. Selected outcome parameters improved during the observation period nearly reaching the level before FFP after 1 year. SF-8 PCS, Barthel index and rate of patients living home were higher in the operative group at t4. The improvement of autonomy (independent walking) between t1 and t4 was significant in the operated group (p = 0.04) but not in the conservative group (p = 0.96). One-year mortality rate was 11.7% with no difference between the fracture types. One-year mortality rate of conservatively treated patients with FFP type II-IV was 13.5% versus 6.9% in the operative group (p = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment is appropriate in patients with FFP type I as well as in patients with FFP type II, provided that the last ones are hospitalized immediately after the traumatic event. Surgical treatment is recommended in patients with higher fracture types, with delayed presentation or after unsuccessful conservative treatment. In the conservative and operative group, all selected parameters considerably improved between t1 and t4 with a steeper increase in the operative group. The rate of postoperative complications is low. The 1-year mortality rate is the lowest in the operative group. Surgical stabilization of FFP is safe and reliable provided it is performed with care and in the appropriate target group.