[G-DRG System 2005. Analysis and evaluation of significant changes from the viewpoint of HNO medical science]

[Possibilities and limitations for the representation of ENT medicine in the G-DRG reimbursement system. Results of the DRG evaluation project]

BACKGROUND

To improve the representation of ENT medicine in the German diagnosis related groups (G-DRG) reimbursement system, the German Association for ENT Medicine and the ENT Professional Medical Association, in cooperation with the DRG-Research Group of the University Hospital of Muenster, undertook a DRG evaluation project.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was carried out of the DRG data records from 93,605 cases taken at 39 ENT institutions in 2003. A prospective collection of data from 25,666 cases, including defined expenditure data within a 4 month period in 2004, was also made.

RESULTS

The number of cases per ENT institution ranged from 274 to 2,556. The mean case-mix was 792.0 and the mean case-mix index was 0.84. A total of 60.5% of the patients were male and 39.5% female, with an average age of 43.3 years. The mean patient clinical and complexity level (PCCL) was 0.72. Considerable adjustments have to be made, especially in oto-, rhino- and sinus-surgery. Allocation according to the complexity of the surgical procedure is mandatory and requires a revision of the German Catalogue of Medical Procedures. A DRG differentiation based on the PCCL should be implemented more frequently. Diagnostic endoscopies should be allocated via surgical partitioning.

CONCLUSION

The adjustment proposals based on these results will gradually lead to an improved allocation of ENT medical procedures within the G-DRG system in 2006 and later.

[Case allocation of extensive operations on head and neck within the German DRG system 2004-2007: what is the net result of the continued developments in case allocation?]

BACKGROUND

When the German DRG system was implemented there was some doubt about whether patients with extensive head and neck surgery would be properly accounted for. Significant efforts have therefore been invested in analysis and case allocation of those in this group. The object of this study was to investigate whether the changes within the German DRG system have led to improved case allocation.

METHODS

Cost data received from 25 ENT departments on 518 prospective documented cases of extensive head and neck surgery were compared with data from the German institute dealing with remuneration in hospitals (InEK). Statistical measures used by InEK were used to analyse the quality of the overall system and the homogeneity of the individual case groups.

RESULTS

The reduction of variance of inlier costs improved by about 107.3% from the 2004 version to the 2007 version of the German DRG system. The average coefficient of cost homogeneity rose by about 9.7% in the same period. Case mix index and DRG revenues were redistributed from less extensive to the more complex operations. Hospitals with large numbers of extensive operations and university hospitals will gain most benefit from this development.

CONCLUSION

Appropriate case allocation of extensive operations on the head and neck has been improved by the continued development of the German DRG system culminating in the 2007 version. Further adjustments will be needed in the future.

[The German DRG system and its effect on imaging quality in ENT, and head and neck surgery]

BACKGROUND

The new G-DRG system for 2006 was published in September 2005. This article presents, analyses, and comments essential changes in the G-DRG system for 2006 and their consequences for ENT-Medicine.

RESULTS

The complexity of the G-DRG system has increased significantly. In 2006, the case allocation will be more differentiated for common surgical procedures on the middle ear, nose, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands, and for head and neck cancer. Furthermore, the patient's age and the clinical and complexity level (PCCL) will be of increased relevance in selected case constellations. However, diagnostic endoscopies with rigid instruments will still not be regarded as OR procedures.

CONCLUSION

Essential adjustments proposed by the German Association for ENT Medicine (DGHNOKHC) and the ENT Medical Professional Association (HNO-Berufsverband) have been made, and the quality of case allocation of ENT-patients within the G-DRG system improved. Nevertheless, further adjustments to the G-DRG system are necessary.

[ENT and head and neck surgery in the German DRG system 2007]

BACKGROUND

The German DRG system has been further developed into version 2007. For ENT and head and neck surgery, significant changes in the coding of diagnoses and medical operations as well as in the the DRG structure have been made.

RESULTS

New ICD codes for sleep apnoea and acquired tracheal stenosis have been implemented. Surgery on the acoustic meatus, removal of auricle hyaline cartilage for transplantation (e. g. rhinosurgery) and tonsillotomy have been coded in the 2007 version. In addition, the DRG structure has been improved. Case allocation of more than one significant operation has been established.

CONCLUSION

The G-DRG system has gained in complexity. High demands are made on the coding of complex cases, whereas standard cases require mostly only one specific diagnosis and one specific OPS code. The quality of case allocation for ENT patients within the G-DRG system has been improved. Nevertheless, further adjustments of the G-DRG system are necessary.