[Intraoperative monitoring of cochlear nerve function during cerebello-pontine angle surgery]

[Vestibular Schwannoma: Factors in Therapy Decision-Making]

The treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VS) has always posed a challenge for physicians. Three essential treatment principles are available: wait-and-scan, surgery, and stereotactic radiotherapy. In addition to the type of treatment, decisions must be made regarding the optimal timing of therapy, the combination of different treatment modalities, the potential surgical approach, and the type and intensity of radiation. Factors influencing the therapy decision include tumor location and size or stage, patient age, comorbidities, symptoms, postoperative hearing rehabilitation options, patient preferences, and, not least, the experience of the surgeons and the personnel and technical capabilities of the clinical site. This article begins with a brief overview of vestibular schwannomas, then outlines the fundamental interdisciplinary treatment options, and finally discusses the ENT (ear, nose, and throat)-relevant factors in the therapy decision.

Soft and stretchable organic bioelectronics for continuous intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during microsurgery

In microneurosurgery, it is crucial to maintain the structural and functional integrity of the nerve through continuous intraoperative identification of neural anatomy. To this end, here we report the development of a translatable system leveraging soft and stretchable organic-electronic materials for continuous intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The system uses conducting polymer electrodes with low impedance and low modulus to record near-field action potentials continuously during microsurgeries, offers higher signal-to-noise ratios and reduced invasiveness when compared with handheld clinical probes for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and can be multiplexed, allowing for the precise localization of the target nerve in the absence of anatomical landmarks. Compared with commercial metal electrodes, the neurophysiological monitoring system allowed for enhanced post-operative prognoses after tumour-resection surgeries in rats. Continuous recording of near-field action potentials during microsurgeries may allow for the precise identification of neural anatomy through the entire procedure.

[Cochlear nerve continuity preservation during retrosigmoid ablative osteotomy of the internal auditory canal for advanced vestibular schwannomas]

The data of 86 patients with retrosigmoid microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma in tumor stage Koos II-IV were evaluated. In more than two thirds of the cases it was shown that the cochlear nerve followed the facial nerve, which is easily identified by electroneurography, in recurrent similar patterns in the region of the internal auditory canal. Starting from the fundus, this facilitated early identification and thus preservation of continuity of the cochlear nerve in the course of the internal auditory canal. This was of particular importance when safe functional preservation could not be guaranteed due to tumor size or formation despite intraoperative derivation of somatosenoric potentials, but when the possibility of subsequent hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant should be granted. Preoperative MRI sequences gave an indication of the possible nerve courses in some cases, but intraoperative imaging in the internal auditory canal was superior to MRI.

Neuromonitoring of the cochlear nerve during vestibular schwannoma resection and simultaneous cochlear implantation

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors that originate from the nerve sheath of one of the two vestibular nerves. VS can have a severe impact on everyday life of the patient and may lead to symptoms such as vertigo, hearing loss (e.g., as sudden deafness), deafness, and tinnitus. Treatment concepts include observational waiting with regular imaging control ("wait and scan"), radiotherapy, or surgical resection. Depending on the size of the tumor and status of functional hearing, the surgical approach may be retrosigmoidal, transtemporal, retrolabyrinthine, or translabyrinthine. The translabyrinthine approach always results in complete deafness due to opening of the bony labyrinth. If the nerve structure of the cochlear nerve is preserved, hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant (CI) may be successful. In this article the surgical technique for microsurgical resection of VS using a translabyrinthine approach with simultaneous cochlear implantation under intraoperative monitoring of the cochlear nerve by electrical stimulation is presented.

[Neuromonitoring of the cochlear nerve during vestibular schwannoma resection and simultaneous cochlear implantation. German version]

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors that originate from the nerve sheath of one of the two vestibular nerves. VS can have a severe impact on everyday life of the patient and may lead to symptoms such as vertigo, hearing loss (e.g., as sudden deafness), deafness, and tinnitus. Treatment concepts include observational waiting with regular imaging control ("wait and scan"), radiotherapy, or surgical resection. Depending on the size of the tumor and status of functional hearing, the surgical approach may be retrosigmoidal, transtemporal, retrolabyrinthine, or translabyrinthine. The translabyrinthine approach always results in complete deafness due to opening of the bony labyrinth. If the nerve structure of the cochlear nerve is preserved, hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant (CI) may be successful. In this article the surgical technique for microsurgical resection of VS using a translabyrinthine approach with simultaneous cochlear implantation under intraoperative monitoring of the cochlear nerve by electrical stimulation is presented.

[Surgical indications and complications management in vestibular schwannoma]

BACKGROUND

Recent surgical treatment concepts for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) require an interdisciplinary approach as well as recognition and mastering of complications.

OBJECTIVE

This paper provides an overview of indications, as well as possible options for function preservation and management of complications in the surgical resection of these tumors.

METHODS

Up-to-date treatment concepts and surgical indications were differentiated according to size and extent of tumors. The frequency of important complications was extracted from the literature. Technical options to avoid and correct complications were compiled from personal experience and review of the literature.

RESULTS

Complications unrelated to cranial nerves are not infrequent, particularly in older patients. Small and medium-sized tumors that do not reach the fundus and cochlear fossa can be completely removed with good chances of hearing preservation. As long as these tumors do not grow, patients benefit from observation. Large tumors are overrepresented in surgical series compared to their prevalence. Postoperative facial nerve function correlates to tumor volume. Hearing preservation in these tumors is rare. Intraoperative electrophysiological techniques are valuable for attempted preservation of cranial nerve function. Persistent facial palsies can be remedied by dynamic and static interventions for facial rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

Mortality and morbidity associated with surgical treatment of VS are very acceptable. Surgical concepts should be custom-tailored to the individual patient in order to ensure high quality of life.

[Neuroprotective medication in vestibular schwannoma surgery]

BACKGROUND

Except for glucocorticoids there is a lack of neuroprotective medication in neurosurgical interventions.

OBJECTIVE

An overview of clinical trials investigating administration of the calcium antagonist nimodipine and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery is given. Basic research is addressed and potential neuroprotective effect mechanisms are discussed, as are perspectives for application of the concept to other types of surgery with a risk postoperative impairment of nerve function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A selective PubMed search was performed and all 10 clinical trials corresponding to the search criteria were included.

RESULTS

Four trials with an intraoperative start of the medication showed a positive effect for the preservation of facial nerve function and hearing preservation. A pilot study showed superiority of prophylactic treatment over intraoperative application. There were no significant results in a prospective multicenter phase III trial. After 1 year, postoperative facial nerve preservation rates were excellent in both groups. However, the risk of hearing loss was twice as high in the control group. A combined analysis of the phase III trial with its pilot study showed significant results for better hearing preservation rates in the treatment group (probably by increasing the case load).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic nimodipine can be recommended in VS surgery in patients with good preoperative hearing. The effect mechanisms of nimodipine and modifications to prophylaxis should be clarified in basic research.

Electrophysiological Measurements of Peripheral Vestibular Function-A Review of Electrovestibulography

Electrocochleography (EcochG), incorporating the Cochlear Microphonic (CM), the Summating Potential (SP), and the cochlear Compound Action Potential (CAP), has been used to study cochlear function in humans and experimental animals since the 1930s, providing a simple objective tool to assess both hair cell (HC) and nerve sensitivity. The vestibular equivalent of ECochG, termed here Electrovestibulography (EVestG), incorporates responses of the vestibular HCs and nerve. Few research groups have utilized EVestG to study vestibular function. Arguably, this is because stimulating the cochlea in isolation with sound is a trivial matter, whereas stimulating the vestibular system in isolation requires significantly more technical effort. That is, the vestibular system is sensitive to both high-level sound and bone-conducted vibrations, but so is the cochlea, and gross electrical responses of the inner ear to such stimuli can be difficult to interpret. Fortunately, several simple techniques can be employed to isolate vestibular electrical responses. Here, we review the literature underpinning gross vestibular nerve and HC responses, and we discuss the nomenclature used in this field. We also discuss techniques for recording EVestG in experimental animals and humans and highlight how EVestG is furthering our understanding of the vestibular system.