[Flat rate reimbursement system for minimally invasive management of unstable vertebral fractures. An analysis of costs and benefits]

Pain regulation and health-related quality of life after thoracolumbar fractures of the spine

Fractures of the thoracolumbar spine rank among the severest injuries of the human skeleton. Especially in younger patients they often result from high-energy accidents. Recently, a shift in paradigm towards more aggressive treatment strategies including anterior procedures could be observed. However, so far only few data exist reflecting the quality of life (QoL) after such injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate medium-term QoL and further to identify factors that influence the clinical outcome in patients with fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Data of 906 patients who were treated during a 10-year period in our institution were evaluated retrospectively. Only patients with single-level traumatic injuries aged between 18 and 65 years without neurological deficits, concomitant injuries of other locations and internal comorbidities were included into the investigation (n = 204). Three different treatment groups (i.e. non-operative, dorsal and dorsoventral stabilisation) were compared to healthy controls as well as different pain populations. The QoL was assessed using established questionnaires (SF-36, HFAQ, VAS-Spinescore, PRQ, and PTSD). Sixty-five percent of the included patients (n = 133) were studied at an average follow-up of 5.3 +/- 1.7 years after injury. All treatment groups revealed an identical gender and age distribution. More severe and unstable injuries were found in the surgical groups associated with higher treatment costs and a longer inability to work. Compared to healthy controls, QoL was compromised to the same extent in all groups. Furthermore, all patients treated in this study did significantly better than low back pain individuals with regard to QoL and pain regulation parameters. In our study, patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures showed a reduced QoL compared to healthy controls. Thus, patients do not seem to regain their former QoL. However, the level of discomfort was comparably low in all groups, even in patients with more severe injuries requiring extensive surgery. Overall, outcome and QoL after traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine rather seem to be determined by the severity of injury than by pain regulation or other psychosocial factors which is likely the case in low back pain disorders.

Kosten- und Nutzenanalyse der intraoperativen 3D-Bildgebung

BACKGROUND

With intraoperative 3D imaging, inevitable corrections may be done already during the operation, and a second procedure can be avoided. The purpose of this study was to perform a cost-benefit analysis during the first year of intraoperative 3D application in order to provide a cost transparency for the surgeon within the current DRG system.

METHODS

On the basis of internal data and the literature, the annual operating costs of the ISO-C(3D) were calculated at 27,940 euros (purchase price, depreciation, maintenance, repair), the costs of an average revision as a secondary operation at 2,385 euros (costs avoided with the ISO-C(3D), Siremobil, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), and the dynamic costs of an intraoperative 3D scan were averaged to 131.08 euros (draping, additional time, personnel).

RESULTS

In the year 2003 intraoperative 3D scanning was done in 126 patients, and intraoperative revision was performed in 24 (19%) due to the additional intraoperative 3D information provided by the Siremobil. In 11 (8.7%) patients the implant position was corrected and in 13 (10.3%) patients the reduction was improved. Taking only fixed costs into consideration, 29,311.52 euros could be saved, and when fixed and dynamic costs are taken into account 12,795.44 euros could be saved. Since the parameters for each hospital are different, the following formula for an individual computation is suitable. For the calculation of the cost the following mathematical relationship results: (annual fixed costs) + (costs per scan x number of cases) - (revision costs x revision rate [p]) x number of cases [N]) = 0.

DISCUSSION

Although the costs of an ISO-C(3D) are considerably high, an economic benefit can also accrue with frequent application and high rates of avoided revision. However, if the rate of avoided revision adds up to only 5%, a substantial deficit may result.

[Cost effectiveness of intraoperative three-dimensional imaging with a mobile surgical C-arm]

DRGs lead to a new definition of refunding medical treatment. The calculated DRG covers all costs of the individual hospital stay of each patient. Any revision surgery is not refunded separately. Especially in spine surgery and in articular fractures, postoperative X-ray control sometime reveals malposition of implants that later require operative revision. The latter causes additional costs that can be in the range of 50% of the whole refund as shown here for tibia plateau and calcaneus fractures. New intraoperative 3D fluoro techniques provide CT-like images of bones and joints that enable the surgeon to optimize implant positions immediately. Despite higher initial costs as compared to conventional imaging devices, these technologies help to increase process quality in the OR and clearly save costs.