[Reasons for proximal femoral fracture surgery delays : Analysis of the structured dialog in Rheinland-Pfalz]

Time to surgery after proximal femur fracture in geriatric patients depends on hospital size and provided level of care: analysis of the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU)

PURPOSE

Proximal femur fractures predominantly affect older patients and can mark a drastic turning point in their lives. To avoid complications and reduce mortality, expert associations recommend surgical treatment within 24-48 h after admission. Due to the high incidence, treatment is provided at a wide range of hospitals with different size and level of care, which may affect time to surgery.

METHODS

Data from 19,712 patients included from 2016 to 2019 in the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU) were analyzed in terms of time to surgery, in-house mortality, mobilization on the first postoperative day, ambulation status on the 7th day after surgery, and initiation of osteoporosis therapy. Participating hospitals were grouped according to their classification as level I, II or III trauma centers. Also presence of additional injuries, intake and type of anticoagulants were considered. Linear and logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of hospitals level of care on each item.

RESULTS

28.6% of patients were treated in level I, 37.7% in level II, and 33.7% in level III trauma centers. There was no significant difference in age, sex and ASA-score. Mean time to surgery was 19.2 h (IQR 9.0-29.8) in level I trauma centers and 16.8 h (IQR 6.5-24) in level II/III trauma centers (p < 0.001). Surgery in the first 24 h after admission was provided for 64.7% of level I and 75.0% of level II/III patients (p < 0.001). Treatment in hospitals with higher level of care and subsequent increased time to surgery showed no significant influence on in-house mortality (OR 0.90, 95%-CI 0.78-1.04), but negative effects on walking ability 7 days after surgery could be observed (OR 1.28, 95%-CI 1.18-1.38).

CONCLUSION

In hospitals of larger size and higher level of care the time to surgery for patients with a proximal femur fracture was significantly higher than in smaller hospitals. No negative effects regarding in-house mortality, but for ambulation status during in-hospital stay could be observed. As the number of these patients will constantly increase, specific treatment capacities should be established regardless of the hospitals size.

[Risk factors affecting mortality in patients with hip fractures at a regional trauma center]

Hintergrund

Krankenhäuser der Grund- und Regelversorgung bzw. regionale Traumazentren spielen eine essenzielle Rolle in der Versorgung hüftgelenknaher Frakturen.

Ziel

Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht den Zusammenhang zwischen patientenbezogenen Parametern und der Klinikmortalität sowie dem Auftreten von Komplikationen bei solchen Frakturen an einem regionalen Traumazentrum.

Methoden

Im Rahmen einer retrospektiven Studie wurden die Daten von allen Patienten, die über 2 Jahre an einem regionalen Traumazentrum mit einer hüftgelenknahen Fraktur aufgenommen wurden, erfasst. Eingeschlossen wurden nur Patienten älter als 60 Jahre. Die patientenbezogenen Parameter umfassten Alter, Geschlecht, Frakturlokalisation, Methode der operativen Versorgung, Operationszeitpunkt, Dauer der Operation und des stationären Aufenthalts, Bluttransfusion, Komplikationen, Komorbiditäten, Einnahme von Antikoagulanzien und Notwendigkeit einer postoperativen intensivmedizinischen Behandlung. Der Zusammenhang zwischen diesen Parametern und der Klinikmortalität sowie dem Auftreten von Komplikationen wurde untersucht.

Ergebnisse

Daten von 360 Patienten mit 335 Operationen (w:m 225:110) mit einem Alter von 83 ±8 Jahren wurden erfasst. Die Klinikmortalität lag bei 7,76 % (n = 26) und erhöhte sich bei Alter > 85 Jahren (Odds Ratio [OR] 5,126; 95%-Konfidenzintervall [95 %-KI] 0,665–39,498; p = 0,1167), männlichem Geschlecht (OR 1,85 95%-KI [0,82–4,14]; p = 0,0555), Zeitpunkt der Operation > 24 h (OR 1,896 95%-KI [0,661–5,441]; p = 0,2341), ≥ 3 Vorerkrankungen (OR 10,61 95%-KI [3,681–27,501]; p < 0,0001), Einnahme von Antikoagulanzien (OR 6,19 95%-KI [2,69–14,24]; p < 0,0001) und notwendiger postoperativer intensivmedizinischer Behandlung (OR 5,9 95%-KI [2,56–13,76]; p < 0,0001).

Schlussfolgerung

In der vorliegenden Studie fanden sich statistisch signifikante Einflüsse der Anzahl der Komorbiditäten, der Einnahme von Antikoagulanzien sowie der intensivmedizinischen Behandlung auf die Klinikmortalität bei Patienten mit hüftgelenknahen Frakturen an einem regionalen Traumazentrum.

Zusatzmaterial online

Zusätzliche Informationen sind in der Online-Version dieses Artikels (10.1007/s00391-021-01869-9) enthalten.

[Subtrochanteric femur fractures-epidemiology, surgical procedures, influence of time to surgery and comorbidities on complications : A risk-adjusted regression analysis of routine data from 2124 cases]

BACKGROUND

There are approximately 12,000 subtrochanteric femur fractures in Germany per year with a rising trend but studies about the epidemiology and the surgical outcome are rare. Furthermore, there are no guidelines from expert societies and there is no adequate quality assurance.

OBJECTIVE

Presentation of the epidemiology and the current treatment situation with respect to the patient collective, comorbidities, time to surgery and surgical procedures used as well as the identification of modifiable risk factors with respect to complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Analysis of routine data based on an established data model in 2124 cases. The descriptive statistics contain data on basic patient characteristics, such as age, comorbidities, surgical procedure, time to surgery and mortality. In the analytical statistics the impact of risk factors (surgical procedure, time to surgery etc.) on the endpoints mortality, complications and decubitus was investigated by logistical regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of the patients 55% were operated on within the first 24h. Intramedullary osteosynthesis (89%) is the most frequently used surgical method (prostheses 2%, extramedullary procedures 5%). Within the first postoperative year 37% of the patients received a higher level of care, where the care was moved from outpatient to inpatient treatment. The mortality in the first postoperative year was 26%, while early complications were observed in 6%. A delay in surgical treatment was associated with an increased mortality and intrinsic factors, which were difficult to influence. Intramedullary osteosynthesis had the lowest mortality and revision rates.

CONCLUSION

Concerning the epidemiological data, the patient collectives of subtrochanteric fractures and femoral neck or pertrochanteric fractures were very similar. Major delays in the time to surgery of subtrochanteric fractures can be associated with increased complication rates and mortality. Therefore, programs to prevent older patients from falling have a high priority.

Hip Fractures: Therapy, Timing, and Complication Spectrum

Objective

Investigation of the treatment of femur fractures and the type of femur fracture‐associated complications regarding timing of surgery and length of hospital stay.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 358 hip fractures were evaluated retrospectively from 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2010 at a level I trauma center in Germany. Inclusion criteria was age >18 years and a proximal femur fracture. Both sexes were evaluated. Mean age was 75.5 years, most patients were female (63.7%). Intervention was the operative treatment of proximal femur fracture. Outcome parameters were time until surgery, complications, reoperations, mortality, and length of hospital stay.

Results

Among the proximal femur fractures (n = 358), 46.6% were pertrochanteric, 11.2% subtrochanteric, and 42.2% femoral neck fractures. Operation upon hip fractures was managed regularly within 24 hours of injury (73%; mean for femoral neck: 28.3 hrs.; mean for pertrochanteric fractures: 21.4 hrs.; mean for subtrochanteric fractures: 19.5 hrs.). Delayed treatment, as well as implantation of hip total endoprosthesis (TEP), increased the overall length of hospital stay (15.4 vs 17.6 days; 18.1 vs 15.8 days). Accordingly, surgical procedures performed within 24 hours of injury resulted in a shorter hospital residence. Longest delay of operation was measured for hip fractures (28.3 hrs.).

In 351 patients, secondary injuries were detected in 94 individuals (26%), with fractures being the most common secondary injury (n = 40). We recorded postoperative complications of nonsurgical and surgical origin, and 33.6% of our patient cohort displayed complications. Complications were distributed among 118 patients. There was no significant difference in complications regarding the time of operation, with most nonsurgical and surgical complications appearing within 24 hours after operation (n = 110 vs n = 31). Nonsurgical complications, such as anemia (n = 49) and electrolyte imbalances (n = 30), were observed more frequently than surgical complications (n = 107 vs n = 34); however, these complications were reduced by delay in surgery (82.0% in 6–24 hrs. vs 74.2% in ≥24 hrs.). Anticoagulant therapy and age did not affect postoperative complications. The hospital mortality of patients was 6.2%. Follow‐up was restrained to ambulatory visits in the clinic.

Conclusions

Surgical management of hip fractures performed within 24 hours of injury minimizes hospital stay. We did not detect significant differences in the spectrum or number of complications regarding delay of surgery. Surgical complications mainly occur with rapid primary care, and medical complications can be reduced by more intensive preparation of patient and operation procedures.

[Changes in the patient population with proximal femur fractures over the last decade : Incidence, age, comorbidities, and length of stay]

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade, the percentage of people >65 years has increased from 16.6% to 20.7%. In industrialized countries, the annual incidence in people >65 years with a proximal femur fracture is about 600-900 per 100,000 population. The incidence will increase by 3-5% per year. Guidelines advocate early surgery as soon as possible but within 24 h. External quality control requires surgical treatment within 48 h. In this study, the changes in the patient population with proximal femur fractures and their treatment during the last decade were investigated.

METHODS

From 2005-2014, data of all patients ≥65 years with proximal femur fractures were recorded. The patients were treated in a level 1 trauma center certified by the German Society for Trauma Surgery. The evaluation was carried out by means of descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

In all, 2093 patients with proximal femur fractures (1164 trochanteric neck fractures and 929 femoral neck fractures) were evaluated. The annual increase in the percentage of patients was 1.5-2%. Over the decade, the percentage of patients increased by 20% and the average age increased by 2 years. There were no changes in comorbidities or case mix index during the investigation period. Despite the increase of the preoperative waiting times, a decrease in the total length of stay was found.

DISCUSSION

The increase in the number of patients, as well as the requirements of the guidelines and external quality control are relevant challenges for the hospitals. More human and material resources (e. g., surgical capacity) are needed. The increase in the age of the patients, their comorbidities, and medication must be taken into account, e. g., in the context of geriatric orthopedic trauma centers.